Advisory Committees on the Federal Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, and Criminal Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence; Hearings on Proposed Amendments to the Appellate, Bankruptcy, Criminal, and Evidence Rules, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, 37610-37611 [2017-16916]
Download as PDF
37610
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Notices
The Principal Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, on behalf of
the Secretary of the Interior, will
immediately acquire title to the
Cherokee Springs Site in the name of
the United States of America in trust for
the Nation upon fulfillment of
Departmental requirements.
The 45.92 acres, more or less, are
located in Cherokee County, Oklahoma,
and are described as follows:
Indian Meridian, Oklahoma Township
16 North, Range 22 East
Section 9 A tract of land situated in
the SE1/4 and in the S1/2 S1/2 NE1/4
of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range
22 East of the Indian Meridian,
Cherokee County, Oklahoma, being a
portion of that parcel of land conveyed
to Cherokee Nation Property
Management, LLC in Document No. I–
2012–008705 filed December 28, 2012
in Book 1055 at Pages 778–779 in the
official records of the Cherokee County
Clerk, said tract being more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner
of said SE1/4, marked with a Mag Nail;
Thence, N. 89° 52′ 00″ W. along the
South boundary of said Section 9, a
distance of 1734.91 feet;
Thence, N. 0° 05′ 50″ W., a distance
of 758.57 feet to a 3/8″ rebar capped
Chaffin LS 1243 to the true POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence, N. 0°05′50″ W., a distance of
2117.10 feet to a 3/8″ rebar capped
Chaffin LS 1243;
Thence, N. 89°54′10″ E., a distance of
1083.04 feet to a 3/8″ rebar capped
Chaffin LS 1243;
Thence, S. 0°04′58″ W., a distance of
1215.47 feet to a 3/8″ rebar capped
Chaffin LS 1243.
Dated: June 12, 2017.
Michael S. Black,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–16906 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–582 and 731–
TA–1377 (Preliminary)]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Ripe Olives From Spain
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Aug 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that there is a reasonable indication that
an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of ripe olives from Spain, provided for
in subheadings 2005.70.02, 2005.70.04,
2005.70.50, 2005.70.60, 2005.70.70, and
2005.70.75 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States, that are
alleged to be sold in the United States
at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to
be subsidized by the government of
Spain.
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigations
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative
preliminary determinations in the
investigations under sections 703(b) or
733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary
determinations are negative, upon
notice of affirmative final
determinations in those investigations
under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigations. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
Background
On June 22, 2017, the Coalition for
Fair Trade in Ripe Olives, consisting of
Bell-Carter Foods, Walnut Creek, CA,
and Musco Family Olive Company,
Tracy, CA, filed a petition with the
Commission and Commerce, alleging
that an industry in the United States is
materially injured or threatened with
material injury by reason of LTFV and
subsidized imports of ripe olives from
Spain. Accordingly, effective June 22,
2017, the Commission, pursuant to
sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted
countervailing duty investigation No.
701–TA–582 and antidumping duty
investigation No. 731–TA–1377
(Preliminary).
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of June 28, 2017 (82 FR
29327). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on July 12, 2017, and
all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to sections
703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed
and filed its determinations in these
investigations on August 7, 2017. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 4718 (August
2017), entitled Ripe Olives from Spain:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–582 and
731–TA–1377 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 7, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–16911 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Advisory Committees on the Federal
Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, and
Criminal Procedure, and the Federal
Rules of Evidence; Hearings on
Proposed Amendments to the
Appellate, Bankruptcy, Criminal, and
Evidence Rules, the Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases in the United
States District Courts, and the Rules
Governing Section 2255 Proceedings
for the United States District Courts
Advisory Committees on the
Federal Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy,
and Criminal Procedure, and the
Federal Rules of Evidence, Judicial
Conference of the United States.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments
and open hearings.
AGENCY:
The Advisory Committees on
Appellate, Bankruptcy, Criminal, and
Evidence Rules have proposed
amendments to the following rules and
forms:
Appellate Rules: 3, 13, 26.1, 28, and
32.
Bankruptcy Rules: 2002, 4001, 6007,
9036, 9037, and Official Form 410.
Criminal Rules: New Criminal Rule
16.1, Rule 5 of the Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases, and Rule 5 of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Notices
Rules Governing Section 2255
Proceedings.
Rules of Evidence: 807.
The text of the proposed rules and
form and the accompanying Committee
Notes are posted on the Judiciary’s Web
site at: https://www.uscourts.gov/rulespolicies/proposed-amendmentspublished-public-comment.
All written comments and suggestions
with respect to the proposed
amendments may be submitted on or
after the opening of the period for
public comment on August 15, 2017,
but no later than February 15, 2018.
Written comments must be submitted
electronically, following the
instructions provided on the Web site.
All comments submitted will be posted
on the Web site and available to the
public.
Public hearings are scheduled on the
proposed amendments as follows:
• Appellate Rules in Washington, DC,
on November 9, 2017, and in Phoenix,
Arizona, on January 5, 2018;
• Bankruptcy Rules in Washington,
DC, on January 17, 2018, and in
Pasadena, California, on January 30,
2018;
• Criminal Rules in Chicago, Illinois,
on October 24, 2017, and in Phoenix,
Arizona, on January 5, 2018; and
• Evidence Rules in Boston,
Massachusetts, on October 27, 2017, and
in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 5, 2018.
Those wishing to testify must contact
the Secretary by email at: Rules_
Support@ao.uscourts.gov, with a copy
mailed to the address below, at least 30
days before the hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary,
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure of the Judicial Conference of
the United States, Thurgood Marshall
Federal Judiciary Building, One
Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7–240,
Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202)
502–1820.
Dated: August 7, 2017.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice
and Procedure, Judicial Conference of the
United States.
[FR Doc. 2017–16916 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S. Decision and
Order
On May 5, 2017, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Aug 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
Administration (hereinafter, DEA or
Government), issued an Order to Show
Cause to Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S.
(hereinafter, Registrant), the holder of
Certificate of Registration No.
AG1976971 in Chula Vista, California,
pursuant to which he is authorized to
prescribe controlled substances in
Schedules II through IV.1 GX 1
(Certification of Registration Status
dated May 17, 2017). The Show Cause
Order proposed the revocation of
Registrant’s Certificate of Registration
and the denial of any pending
application for renewal or modification
of Registrant’s registration on the
ground that Registrant does not have
authority to dispense controlled
substances in California, the State in
which he is registered. GX 3, at 1 (citing
21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).
As the jurisdictional basis for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant’s registration
expires on September 30, 2017. Id.
As the substantive grounds for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant currently lacks
authority to ‘‘handle controlled
substances in California,’’ voluntarily
surrendered his California dental
license ‘‘on approximately September 8,
2016,’’ and subsequently ‘‘signed a
Stipulated Surrender of License and
Order before the Dental Board of
California’’ on November 7, 2016.2 Id. at
2. The Government asserted that
Registrant’s ‘‘lack of authority to handle
controlled substances in the State of
California constitutes grounds to revoke
. . . [his] registration.’’ Id.
Citing 21 CFR 1301.43, the Show
Cause Order notified Registrant of his
right to request a hearing on the
allegation or to submit a written
statement while waiving his right to a
hearing, the procedure for electing each
option, and the consequence for failing
to elect either option. Id. at 2. Citing 21
U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C), it notified Registrant
of the opportunity to submit a corrective
action plan. Id. at 3.
The lead DEA Diversion Investigator
(hereinafter, DI) assigned to Registrant’s
matter executed a Declaration in which
she stated that, on May 5, 2017, she
personally served Registrant with a copy
of the Order to Show Cause at his
1 The Order to Show Cause stated that Registrant
was authorized to prescribe controlled substances
in Schedule V.
2 The Government submitted the Stipulated
Surrender of License and Order before the Dental
Board of California (hereinafter, DBC), the
Accusation dated May 2, 2012, the Decision and
Order of the DBC dated October 4, 2013, and the
DBC Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order
dated July 31, 2013 with its Request for Final
Agency Action (hereinafter, RFAA). GX 4
(Appendices).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37611
residence. GX 4, at 1. I find that the
Government’s service of the Show Cause
Order on Registrant was legally
sufficient.
The Government submitted a Request
for Final Agency Action dated June 6,
2017 and an evidentiary record to
support the Show Cause Order’s
allegations. In the RFAA, the
Government represented that, ‘‘Thirty
days passed from the date of service and
Respondent requested no hearing on the
OTSC, nor has he filed a written
statement in lieu of requesting a
hearing.’’ RFAA, at 1.
Based on the Government’s
representations and my review of the
record, I find that more than 30 days
have now passed since the date on
which Registrant was served with the
Show Cause Order and neither
Registrant, nor anyone purporting to
represent him, has requested a hearing
or submitted a written statement while
waiving his right to a hearing.
Accordingly, I find that Registrant has
waived his right to a hearing and his
right to submit a written statement. 21
CFR 1301.43(d). I therefore issue this
Decision and Order based on the record
submitted by the Government. 21 CFR
1301.43(e).
Findings of Fact
Registrant’s DEA Registration
Registrant currently holds DEA
practitioner registration AG1976971
authorizing him to dispense controlled
substances in Schedules II through IV.
GX 1, GX 2. This registration expires on
September 30, 2017. Id.
DEA practitioner registration
AG1976971 is assigned to Registrant at
‘‘232 Third Avenue, Ste A, 232 3rd
Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910.’’ Id.
The Status of Registrant’s State License
On November 15, 2016, the Dental
Board of California ordered that Dental
License No. 24551 was surrendered and
accepted by the DBC. GX 4, Appendix
A (Stipulated Surrender of License and
Order). Pursuant to that Order,
Registrant has lost ‘‘all rights and
privileges as a dentist in California.’’ Id.
at 2.
Discussion
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), the
Attorney General is authorized to
suspend or revoke a registration issued
under section 823 of the Controlled
Substances Act (hereinafter, CSA),
‘‘upon a finding that the registrant . . .
has had his State license . . .
suspended, revoked, or denied by
competent State authority and is no
longer authorized by State law to engage
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 154 (Friday, August 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37610-37611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16916]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES
Advisory Committees on the Federal Rules of Appellate,
Bankruptcy, and Criminal Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence;
Hearings on Proposed Amendments to the Appellate, Bankruptcy, Criminal,
and Evidence Rules, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the
United States District Courts, and the Rules Governing Section 2255
Proceedings for the United States District Courts
AGENCY: Advisory Committees on the Federal Rules of Appellate,
Bankruptcy, and Criminal Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence,
Judicial Conference of the United States.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments and open hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Advisory Committees on Appellate, Bankruptcy, Criminal,
and Evidence Rules have proposed amendments to the following rules and
forms:
Appellate Rules: 3, 13, 26.1, 28, and 32.
Bankruptcy Rules: 2002, 4001, 6007, 9036, 9037, and Official Form
410.
Criminal Rules: New Criminal Rule 16.1, Rule 5 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases, and Rule 5 of the
[[Page 37611]]
Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings.
Rules of Evidence: 807.
The text of the proposed rules and form and the accompanying
Committee Notes are posted on the Judiciary's Web site at: https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/proposed-amendments-published-public-comment.
All written comments and suggestions with respect to the proposed
amendments may be submitted on or after the opening of the period for
public comment on August 15, 2017, but no later than February 15, 2018.
Written comments must be submitted electronically, following the
instructions provided on the Web site. All comments submitted will be
posted on the Web site and available to the public.
Public hearings are scheduled on the proposed amendments as
follows:
Appellate Rules in Washington, DC, on November 9, 2017,
and in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 5, 2018;
Bankruptcy Rules in Washington, DC, on January 17, 2018,
and in Pasadena, California, on January 30, 2018;
Criminal Rules in Chicago, Illinois, on October 24, 2017,
and in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 5, 2018; and
Evidence Rules in Boston, Massachusetts, on October 27,
2017, and in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 5, 2018.
Those wishing to testify must contact the Secretary by email at:
Rules_Support@ao.uscourts.gov, with a copy mailed to the address below,
at least 30 days before the hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary,
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One
Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7-240, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202)
502-1820.
Dated: August 7, 2017.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, Judicial
Conference of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2017-16916 Filed 8-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P