Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of Michigan, 37282-37283 [2017-16717]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
37282
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 9, 2017 / Notices
elements to be reported using codes if the
information necessary to interpret such codes
is widely available to users on a non-fee
basis. Notwithstanding this requirement,
DDR has proposed to rely on proprietary
classification systems such as CUSIP
numbers, ISIN codes, and/or Markit RED
codes to identify specific securities, reference
entities, or reference obligations, which may
subject market participants to fees and usage
restrictions in contravention of Rule 903(b).
Please provide your views as to whether the
approach proposed by DDR would be an
appropriate means of reporting that
information, or whether use of those
proprietary classification systems would
unduly increase the cost of compliance with
reporting information pursuant to Regulation
SBSR or impair access to publicly
disseminated data.
10. Rule 901(d)(5) of Regulation SBSR
requires reporting sides to report any
additional data elements included in the
agreement between the counterparties that
are necessary to determine the market value
of the transaction, to the extent not already
provided. Please provide your views as to
whether DDR has sufficiently explained how
Users can satisfy this requirement and
whether DDR’s policies and procedures
should include specific data categories
necessary to determine the market value of a
custom basket of securities that underlie an
SBS (e.g. components and risk weights of the
basket). What, if any, changes should be
made? Why?
11. Rule 901(e) of Regulation SBSR
requires reporting sides to report life cycle
events, and any adjustments due to life cycle
events that results in a change to previously
reported primary or secondary trade
information. Please provide your views as to
whether DDR has provided sufficient
information in its Amended Form SDR to
explain how a User would report life cycle
events under Rule 901(e) of Regulation SBSR.
Please describe any additional information
that you feel is necessary. In addition, do
commenters believe that DDR has provided
sufficient information distinguishing the
process of reporting of a life cycle event from
the reporting of a correction to erroneous
trade information? What changes, if any,
should be made?
12. Rule 907(a)(4) of Regulation SBSR
requires an SDR to have policies and
procedures for identifying and establishing
flags to denote characteristics or
circumstances associated with the execution
or reporting of an SBS that could, in the
SDR’s reasonable estimation, cause a person
without knowledge of these characteristic(s)
or circumstance(s), to receive a distorted
view of the market, and for applying and
directing users to apply such flags, as
applicable. Please provide your views as to
whether DDR’s revised policies and
procedures for developing condition flags as
required by Rule 907(a)(4) of Regulation
SBSR are consistent with the goal of
preventing market participants from
receiving a distorted view of the market. Are
there additional condition flags that you
believe DDR should establish? If so, please
describe such condition flags and explain
why you believe that they are appropriate
under Rule 907(a)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Aug 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
13. Please provide your views on whether
DDR’s proposed methodology regarding the
processing of cleared trades is sufficient to
prevent market participants from receiving a
distorted view of the market in all cases. In
particular, please provide your views as to
whether DDR’s process of only accepting
clearing agency acceptance and rejection
messages in the event that DDR receives such
messages prior to the receipt of the
corresponding alpha trade report from the
reporting side is likely to present problems
with alpha transactions lacking a
corresponding disposition message. How, if
at all, would this impact the completeness
and accuracy of the SBS transaction data and
positions?
14. Rule 903(a) of Regulation SBSR
provides, in relevant part, that if no system
has been recognized by the Commission, or
a recognized system has not assigned a UIC
to a particular person, unit of a person, or
product, the registered SDR shall assign a
UIC to that person, unit of person, or product
using its own methodology. Please provide
your views as to whether the revised
approach regarding UICs as described DDR’s
Amended Form SDR is appropriate in light
of the requirements of Rule 903(a) of
Regulation SBSR. Why or why not? In
particular, please provide your views
concerning the approach proposed by DDR
for the creation and use of transaction IDs
consistent with the CPMI–IOSCO guidance
for a global unique transaction identifier.
How, if at all, should this methodology be
changed?
15. Rule 906(a) of Regulation SBSR
requires an SDR to send a daily report to each
participant of that SDR (or the participant’s
execution agent), identifying, for each SBS to
which that participant is a counterparty, any
SBS for which the SDR lacks required UIC
information. Please provide your views as to
whether DDR’s revised policies and
procedures for satisfying the requirements of
Rule 906(a) are appropriate. Why or why not?
What changes, if any, should be made?
16. Rule 907 of Regulation SBSR generally
requires that an SDR have policies and
procedures with respect to the reporting and
dissemination of data. Please provide your
views as to whether DDR has provided
sufficient information in its Amended Form
SDR (including through the publication of its
new Exhibit GG7) to explain the manner in
which DDR intends to publicly disseminate
SBS transaction information under Rule 902
of Regulation SBSR. If not, what additional
information do you think that DDR should
provide about how it intends to effect public
dissemination of SBS transactions?
17. Please provide your views as to
whether DDR’s Amended Form SDR includes
sufficient information about how an agent
could report SBS transaction information to
DDR on behalf of a principal (i.e., a person
who has a duty under Regulation SBSR to
report). Why or why not? If not, please
describe any additional information that you
believe is necessary.
18. Please provide your views about DDR’s
policies and procedures for contacting
counterparties who are not Users. What
changes, if any, should be made?
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/proposed.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number
SBSDR–2016–02 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SBSDR–2016–02.
To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method of
submission. The Commission will post
all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/other.shtml).
Copies of the Form SDR, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the Form
SDR that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating
to the Form SDR between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SBSDR–2016–02 and should be
submitted on or before August 30, 2017.
By the Commission.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–16715 Filed 8–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #15228 and #15229;
Michigan Disaster Number MI–00058]
Presidential Declaration of a Major
Disaster for the State of Michigan
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 9, 2017 / Notices
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Michigan
(FEMA–4326–DR), dated 08/02/2017.
DATES: Issued on 08/02/2017.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 10/02/2017.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 05/02/2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster
Assistance, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 3rd Street SW.,
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416,
(202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
08/02/2017, applications for disaster
loans may be filed at the address listed
above or other locally announced
locations.
Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
Incident Period: 06/22/2017 through
06/27/2017.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans): Bay,
Gladwin, Isabella, Midland, and the
Saginaw Chippewa Tribe within
Isabella County.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only):
Michigan: Arenac, Clare, Gratiot,
Mecosta, Montcalm, Ogemaw,
Osceola, Roscommon, Saginaw,
Tuscola.
The Interest Rates are:
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses
without
Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations with
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Aug 08, 2017
3.875
1.938
6.430
3.215
2.500
2.500
3.215
2.500
Jkt 241001
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 152286 and for
economic injury is 152290.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
Cynthia G. Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017–16717 Filed 8–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 10080]
Notice of Public Meeting
The Department of State will conduct
an open meeting at 10:30 a.m. on
Thursday, September 14, 2017, in U.S.
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2703 Martin
Luther King Jr. Ave. SE., Stop 7509,
Washington, DC 20593–7509, Room
5Y23–21. The primary purpose of the
meeting is to prepare for the fourth
Session of the International Maritime
Organization’s (IMO) Sub-Committee on
Implementation of IMO Instruments (III
4) to be held at the IMO Headquarters,
London, United Kingdom, on September
25–29, 2017.
The agenda items to be considered
include:
—Decisions of other IMO bodies;
—Consideration and analysis of reports
on alleged inadequacy of port
reception facilities;
—Lessons learned and safety issues
identified from the analysis of marine
safety investigation reports;
—Measures to harmonize port state
control (PSC) activities and
procedures worldwide;
—Identified issues related to the
implementation of IMO instruments
from the analysis of PSC data;
—Analysis of consolidated audit
summary reports;
—Updated survey guidelines under the
Harmonized System of Survey and
Certification (HSSC);
—Non-exhaustive list of obligations
under the instruments relevant to the
IMO Instruments Implementation
Code (III Code);
—Unified interpretation of provisions of
IMO safety, security, and environment
related conventions; and
—Review the Model Agreement for the
authorization of recognized
organizations acting on behalf of the
Administration.
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room. Upon request to the
meeting coordinator, members of the
public may also participate via
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37283
teleconference, up to the capacity of the
teleconference phone line. Please
contact the meeting coordinator for
additional details if you plan to
participate by phone. In order to ensure
reasonable accommodation for the full
number of meeting participants, those
who plan to attend should contact the
meeting coordinator, Mr. Chris Gagnon,
by email at Christopher.J.Gagnon@
uscg.mil, by phone at (202) 372–1231, or
in writing at 2703 Martin Luther King Jr.
Ave. SE. , Stop 7509, Washington, DC
20593–7509 not later than September 8,
2017. Requests made after September 8,
2017 might not be able to be
accommodated. Please note that due to
security considerations, two valid,
government issued photo identifications
must be presented to gain entrance to
the Coast Guard Headquarters building.
It is recommended that attendees arrive
to the Headquarters building no later
than 30 minutes ahead of the scheduled
meeting for the security screening
process.
The Headquarters building is
accessible by taxi and public
transportation. Parking in the vicinity of
the building is extremely limited and
not guaranteed.
Joel C. Coito,
Coast Guard Liaison Officer, Office of Ocean
and Polar Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017–16768 Filed 8–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. EP 670 (Sub–No. 2)]
Notice of Rail Energy Transportation
Advisory Committee Vacancy
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice of vacancies on Federal
advisory committee and solicitation of
nominations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board (Board) hereby gives notice of two
vacancies on its Rail Energy
Transportation Advisory Committee
(RETAC) for (1) a representative from
biofuel feedstock growers or providers
and biofuel refiners, processors, and
distributors, and (2) an ‘‘at large’’
representative with relevant experience
in the transportation of energy
resources. The Board is soliciting
suggestions from the public for
candidates to fill these two vacancies.
DATES: Suggestions for candidates for
either RETAC membership position are
due August 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Suggestions may be
submitted either via the Board’s e-filing
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37282-37283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16717]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #15228 and #15229; Michigan Disaster Number MI-
00058]
Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of
Michigan
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37283]]
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Michigan (FEMA-4326-DR), dated 08/02/2017.
DATES: Issued on 08/02/2017.
Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/02/2017.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/02/2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW.,
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/02/2017, applications
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other
locally announced locations.
Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
Incident Period: 06/22/2017 through 06/27/2017.
The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected
by the disaster:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Bay,
Gladwin, Isabella, Midland, and the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe within
Isabella County.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
Michigan: Arenac, Clare, Gratiot, Mecosta, Montcalm, Ogemaw,
Osceola, Roscommon, Saginaw, Tuscola.
The Interest Rates are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere................. 3.875
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere.............. 1.938
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere................. 6.430
Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere.............. 3.215
Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere... 2.500
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere 2.500
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit 3.215
Available Elsewhere.......................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere 2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 152286
and for economic injury is 152290.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)
Cynthia G. Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2017-16717 Filed 8-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P