Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review, 37112-37113 [2017-16677]
Download as PDF
37112
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Notices
Cherokee Indians; Kialegee Tribal
Town; Poarch Band of Creeks
(previously listed as the Poarch Band of
Creek Indians of Alabama); The
Muscogee (Creek) Nation; Thlopthlocco
Tribal Town; and United Keetoowah
Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma
(herein referred to as ‘‘The Consulted
Tribes’’).
History and Description of the Remains
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
At some time prior to February of
1837, human remains representing, at
minimum, one individual were removed
from the Brakebill Mound site (40KN55)
in Knox County, TN, by Professor
Gerard Troost (b. 1776–d.1850).
Professor Troost was a founding
member of the Academy of Natural
Sciences in Philadelphia and state
geologist for Tennessee (1831–1839).
The mound is situated at the junction of
the French Broad and Holston Rivers on
private land. At some time prior to
October of 1838, the human remains
were loaned to Dr. Samuel G. Morton for
his study of human crania from around
the world, and accessioned into his
collections between 1839 and 1840. In
1853, Dr. Morton’s collections were
formally presented to the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia,
loaned to the University of
Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology
and Anthropology in 1966, and formally
gifted to the University of Pennsylvania
Museum of Archaeology and
Anthropology in 1997 (UPM no. 97–
606–992). The human remains consist of
a cranium representing a single male,
over 50 years old. No known
individuals were identified.
Archival records and museum
documentation do not designate a
specific culture for this individual.
Published anthropological information
indicates that the Brakebill Mound site
is a Dallas Phase archeological site
dating from 1300 to 1600 CE. Based on
consultation information and published
ethnographic and anthropological
literature, current evidence suggest that
the Dallas Phase archeological culture
may be associated with the Muscogee
Creek and/or Cherokee cultural
traditions. Today, these groups are
represented by The Consulted Tribes.
Determinations Made by the University
of Pennsylvania Museum of
Archaeology and Anthropology
Officials of the University of
Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology
and Anthropology have determined
that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described in this notice
represent the physical remains of one
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Aug 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
individuals of Native American
ancestry.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the Native American human
remains and The Consulted Tribes.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Lineal descendants or representatives
of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization not identified in this notice
that wish to request transfer of control
of these human remains should submit
a written request with information in
support of the request to Dr. Julian
Siggers, Williams Director, University of
Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology
and Anthropology, 3260 South Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19104, telephone (215)
898–4050, by September 7, 2017. After
that date, if no additional requestors
have come forward, transfer of control
of the human remains to The Consulted
Tribes may proceed.
The University of Pennsylvania
Museum of Archaeology and
Anthropology is responsible for
notifying The Consulted Tribes that this
notice has been published.
Dated: June 19, 2017.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2017–16625 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1185 (Review)]
Steel Nails From the United Arab
Emirates; Scheduling of an Expedited
Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on steel nails from the United
Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
July 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Calvin Chang (202–205–3062), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On July 7, 2017, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (82
FR 16229, April 03, 2017) of the subject
five-year review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
August 3, 2017, and made available to
persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this
review. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before August
8, 2017 and may not contain new factual
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. to
be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
37113
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Notices
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by August 8,
2017. However, should the Department
of Commerce extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules with
respect to filing were revised effective
July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25,
2014), and the revised Commission
Handbook on E-filing, available from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined this review is
extraordinarily complicated and
therefore has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being
conducted under authority of title VII of
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
published pursuant to section 207.62 of
the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 3, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–16677 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Company
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
The DEA has considered the factors in
21 U.S.C. 823, 952(a) and 958(a) and
determined that the registration of the
listed registrants to import the
applicable basic classes of schedule I or
II controlled substances is consistent
with the public interest and with United
States obligations under international
treaties, conventions, or protocols in
effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA
investigated each company’s
maintenance of effective controls
against diversion by inspecting and
testing each company’s physical
security systems, verifying each
company’s compliance with state and
local laws, and reviewing each
company’s background and history.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance
with 21 CFR 1301.34, the DEA has
granted a registration as an importer for
schedule I or II controlled substances to
the above listed persons.
[FR Doc. 2017–16698 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:16 Aug 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–392]
Importer of Controlled Substances
Registration
ACTION:
Notice of registration.
Registrants listed below have
applied for and been granted
registration by the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) as importers of
various classes of schedule I or II
controlled substances.
SUMMARY:
The
companies listed below applied to be
registered as importers of various basic
classes of controlled substances.
Information on previously published
notices is listed in the table below. No
comments or objections were submitted
and no requests for hearing were
submitted for these notices.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FR docket
Cambridge Isotope Laboratories ...............................................
Janssen Ortho LLC ....................................................................
Galephar Pharmaceutical Research, Inc. ..................................
Mallinckrodt LLC ........................................................................
Cerilliant Corporation .................................................................
Dated: August 2, 2017.
Demetra Ashley,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
82
82
82
82
82
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
19083
19083
23069
23071
25335
............................................................................
............................................................................
............................................................................
............................................................................
............................................................................
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Leia A. Frickey, M.D.; Decision and
Order
On February 28, 2017, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to Leia A. Frickey, M.D.
(Registrant), of New Orleans, Louisiana.
The Show Cause Order proposed the
revocation of Registrant’s Certificate of
Registration, the denial of any
applications to renew or modify her
registration, and the denial of any
applications for any other DEA
registration on the ground that she lacks
‘‘state authority to handle controlled
substances’’ in Louisiana, the State in
which she is registered with the DEA.
Order to Show Cause, at 1 (citing 21
U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).
With respect to the Agency’s
jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant is registered as a
practitioner in schedules II through V,
pursuant to DEA Certificate of
Registration BF5029574, at the address
of 3312 South I–10 Service Road,
Metairie, Louisiana. Id. The Order also
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Published
Sfmt 4703
April 25, 2017.
April 25, 2017.
May 19, 2017.
May 19, 2017.
June 1, 2017.
alleged that this registration does not
expire until September 30, 2017. Id.
As substantive grounds for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that on May 6, 2016, the
Louisiana State Board of Medical
Examiners issued a ‘‘Notice of Summary
Suspension of Medical License,
summarily suspending [Registrant’s]
medical license.’’ 1 Id. at 1. As a result,
the Order alleged that Registrant is
‘‘currently without authority to practice
medicine or handle controlled
substances in . . . Louisiana, the [S]tate
in which [she is] registered with the
DEA.’’ Id. at 2. Thus, based on her ‘‘lack
of authority to [dispense] controlled
substances in . . . Louisiana,’’ the Order
asserted that ‘‘DEA must revoke’’ her
1 The Show Cause Order also alleges that ‘‘on July
25, 2016, the Louisiana Board of Pharmacy issued
a Notice of Suspension, suspending [Registrant’s]
Louisiana CDS license, number CDS.024813–MD,
effective May 6, 2016.’’ Id. at 1–2. Although those
exact facts are not reflected in the record, the record
does show that on November 16, 2016, the
Louisiana State Board of Pharmacy issued an Order
that Registrant’s ‘‘LOUISIANA CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCE LICENSE No. 024813 is hereby
indefinitely suspended in accordance with the
suspension of her medical license by the Louisiana
State Board of Medical Examiners on May 6, 2016.’’
See Government Exhibit (GX) 4, at 1.
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37112-37113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16677]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1185 (Review)]
Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates; Scheduling of an
Expedited Five-Year Review
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on steel
nails from the United Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
DATES: July 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Calvin Chang (202-205-3062), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On July 7, 2017, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(82 FR 16229, April 03, 2017) of the subject five-year review was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to
section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information concerning the conduct of this review and
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
August 3, 2017, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are
due on or before August 8, 2017 and may not contain new factual
[[Page 37113]]
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review
by August 8, 2017. However, should the Department of Commerce extend
the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review,
the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's rules with respect to filing were revised effective July
25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), and the revised Commission
Handbook on E-filing, available from the Commission's Web site at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Mid
Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. to be individually adequate. Comments
from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined this review is
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title
VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 3, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-16677 Filed 8-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P