Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5, 37025-37027 [2017-16614]

Download as PDF 37025 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES Applicable geographic or nonattainment area Name of SIP provision State submittal date EPA approval date Explanation Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada 1 * * Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (October 2009), excluding the BART determination for NOX at Reid Gardner Generating Station in sections 5.5.3, 5.6.3 and 7.2, which the EPA has disapproved. Nevada Regional Haze Plan 5-Year Progress Report. * * State-wide .............. * 11/18/09 State-wide .............. 11/18/2014 * * * * 77 FR 50936 (8/23/ 12). * * Excluding Appendix A (‘‘Nevada BART Regulation’’). The Nevada BART regulation, including NAC 445B.029, 445B.22095, and 445B.22096, is listed above in 40 CFR 52.1470(c). [Insert Federal Register citation], 8/8/2017. * * * 1 The organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada’s original 1972 SIP, which was divided into 12 sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans, are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or quasi-regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR 52.1470(c). 3. Section 52.1488 is amended by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows: ■ § 52.1488 Visibility protection. * * * * * (g) Approval. On November 18, 2014, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection submitted the ‘‘Nevada Regional Haze Plan 5-Year Progress Report’’ (‘‘Progress Report’’). The Progress Report meets the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule in 40 CFR 51.308. [FR Doc. 2017–16491 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0067; FRL–9965–67– Region 10] Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/ Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment Area Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to Idaho’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in 2012 and 2014 to address Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for the Idaho portion of the Logan, UtahIdaho fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area (Logan UT–ID area). Based on newly available air quality monitoring data, the EPA is approving Idaho’s attainment demonstration and approving Idaho’s 2014 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Aug 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 progress budgets. Additionally, the EPA is conditionally approving Reasonable Further Progress (RFP), Quantitative Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs for the Idaho portion of the nonattainment area, based on Idaho’s commitment to adopt and submit updates to these attainment plan elements within one year of the effective date of this final action. DATES: This final rule is effective September 7, 2017. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0067. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and is publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at EPA Region 10, Office of Air and Waste, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and Waste (OAW–150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 98101; telephone number: (206) 553– 0256; email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background Information II. Final Action III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review I. Background Information On June 1, 2017, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho’s attainment demonstration and 2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets (82 FR 25208). As part of the same action, the EPA also proposed to conditionally approve RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs for the Idaho portion of the nonattainment area. An explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the submittals, and the EPA’s reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking, and will not be restated here. The public comment period for the proposal ended July 3, 2017. We received no comments. II. Final Action For the reasons set forth in the proposed rulemaking for this action, the EPA is approving the attainment demonstration in Idaho’s 2012 and 2014 revisions to the SIP (Idaho attainment plan) for the Idaho portion of the Logan UT–ID area. The EPA is also approving the 2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets, in that they are consistent with making progress toward attainment of the 24-hour 2006 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards by December 31, 2015. Lastly, the EPA is conditionally approving RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs in the Idaho attainment E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM 08AUR1 37026 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations plan, based on Idaho’s April 25, 2017 commitment to adopt and submit updated plan elements to meet these requirements. Under a conditional approval, the State must adopt and submit the specific revisions it has committed to by a date certain but not later than one year of this final action.1 If the EPA fully approves the submittal of the revisions specified in the commitment letter, the conditional nature of the approval would be removed and the submittal would become fully approved. If the State does not submit these revisions by the date specified in the April 25, 2017 commitment letter, or if the EPA finds the State’s revisions to be incomplete, or EPA disapproves the State’s revisions, a conditional approval will convert to a disapproval. If any of these occur and the EPA’s conditional approval converts to a disapproval, that will constitute a disapproval of a required plan element under part D of title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month clock for sanctions, see section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B). III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); IDEQ’s April 25, 2017 commitment letter, IDEQ committed to submit revisions by August 1, 2018. asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES 1 In VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Aug 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and • does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in Idaho and is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: July 24, 2017. Michelle L. Pirzadeh, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart N—Idaho 2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an additional entry at the end of the table for ‘‘Fine Particulate Matter Attainment Plan.’’ The addition reads as follows: ■ § 52.670 * Identification of plan. * * (e) * * * E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM 08AUR1 * * Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 37027 EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES Name of SIP provision * Fine Particulate Matter Attainment Plan. Applicable geographic or nonattainment area * * Franklin County, Logan UT–ID PM2.5 Nonattainment Area. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 25 [IB Docket No. 06–123, FCC 17–49] Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Broadcasting-Satellite Service at the 17.3–17.8 GHz and the 24.75–25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Feeder Links to the BroadcastingSatellite Service and for Satellite Services Operating Bi-Directionally Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Federal Communications Commission adopts technical rules to mitigate ground-path interference between the Digital Broadcasting Satellite Service (DBS) and the Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) in the 17.3–17.8 GHz band to protect consumers and foster more rapid deployment of services, greater investment, and new innovation. DATES: Effective September 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean O’More, 202–418–2453, or if concerning the information collections in this document, Cathy Williams, 202– 418–2918. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Third Report and Order, FCC 17–49, adopted April 21, 2017, and released April 25, 2017. The full text of the Report and Order is available at https:// apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/ FCC-17-49A1.pdf. It also are available for inspection and copying during business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities, send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Aug 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 12/19/2012; 12/24/2014 EPA approval date Comments * * 8/8/2017, [Insert Federal Register citation]. * * Approved: moderate area attainment demonstration and 2014 reasonable further progress motor vehicle emissions budgets. Conditional Approval: reasonable further progress, quantitative milestone, motor vehicle emission budget requirements. & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202– 418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY). [FR Doc. 2017–16614 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: State submittal date Synopsis This Report and Order adopts new rules to mitigate interference from DBS feeder-link earth stations to BSS consumer earth terminals (ground path interference) in the 17.3–17.8 GHz band. We adopt a rule allowing currentlylicensed DBS feeder link earth stations to continue operations under the terms of their current licenses, and to expand their facilities provided that new antennas are constructed within one kilometer of current antennas and the aggregate power-flux density of the station at any point does not increase. We adopt a methodology for determining a coordination zone for new DBS feeder-link earth stations, and require applicants for new DBS feederlink earth stations to coordinate with BSS licensees to achieve agreement on interference mitigation. We adopt rules specifying the information applicants for new DBS feeder-link earth stations must provide for the purposes of coordination. Paperwork Reduction Act This document contains new and modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. It will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 3507(d) of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies will be invited to comment on the new or modified information collection requirements contained in this proceeding in a separate Federal Register notice. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. We received no comments on this issue. We have assessed the effects of the revisions PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 adopted that might impose information collection burdens on small business concerns, and find that the impact on businesses with fewer than 25 employees will be an overall reduction in burden. Congressional Review Act The Commission will send copies of this Report and Order to Congress and the General Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), and will send a copy including the final regulatory flexibility act analysis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, in accordance with section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (1981). Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Matter of Comprehensive Review of Licensing and Operating Rules for Satellite Services. The Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. No comments were received on the IRFA. This Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA. Need for, and Objectives of, the Rules The objective of the Report and Order is to adopt processing and service rules for the 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) which will address potential interference scenarios which arise in the reverse band operating environment. The rules will mitigate against ground path interference. Specifically, we adopt criteria to facilitate sharing in the 17 GHz bands by BSS and Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) services. These new rules will introduce a new generation of broadband services to the public, providing a mix of local and domestic video, audio, data, video-on-demand, and multimedia services to consumers E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM 08AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37025-37027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0067; FRL-9965-67-Region 10]


Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment 
Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving 
revisions to Idaho's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in 2012 
and 2014 to address Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for the Idaho 
portion of the Logan, Utah-Idaho fine particulate matter 
(PM2.5) nonattainment area (Logan UT-ID area). Based on 
newly available air quality monitoring data, the EPA is approving 
Idaho's attainment demonstration and approving Idaho's 2014 Motor 
Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early progress budgets. 
Additionally, the EPA is conditionally approving Reasonable Further 
Progress (RFP), Quantitative Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs for 
the Idaho portion of the nonattainment area, based on Idaho's 
commitment to adopt and submit updates to these attainment plan 
elements within one year of the effective date of this final action.

DATES: This final rule is effective September 7, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0067. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in 
the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., 
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure 
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and is publicly 
available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials 
are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at EPA Region 10, Office 
of Air and Waste, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The EPA 
requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional 
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office 
of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 
1200 Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206) 
553-0256; email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review

I. Background Information

    On June 1, 2017, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho's attainment 
demonstration and 2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets (82 FR 25208). 
As part of the same action, the EPA also proposed to conditionally 
approve RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs for the Idaho portion of the 
nonattainment area. An explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed 
analysis of the submittals, and the EPA's reasons for proposing 
approval were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking, and will 
not be restated here. The public comment period for the proposal ended 
July 3, 2017. We received no comments.

II. Final Action

    For the reasons set forth in the proposed rulemaking for this 
action, the EPA is approving the attainment demonstration in Idaho's 
2012 and 2014 revisions to the SIP (Idaho attainment plan) for the 
Idaho portion of the Logan UT-ID area. The EPA is also approving the 
2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets, in that they are consistent with 
making progress toward attainment of the 24-hour 2006 PM2.5 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards by December 31, 2015. Lastly, 
the EPA is conditionally approving RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs in the 
Idaho attainment

[[Page 37026]]

plan, based on Idaho's April 25, 2017 commitment to adopt and submit 
updated plan elements to meet these requirements. Under a conditional 
approval, the State must adopt and submit the specific revisions it has 
committed to by a date certain but not later than one year of this 
final action.\1\ If the EPA fully approves the submittal of the 
revisions specified in the commitment letter, the conditional nature of 
the approval would be removed and the submittal would become fully 
approved. If the State does not submit these revisions by the date 
specified in the April 25, 2017 commitment letter, or if the EPA finds 
the State's revisions to be incomplete, or EPA disapproves the State's 
revisions, a conditional approval will convert to a disapproval. If any 
of these occur and the EPA's conditional approval converts to a 
disapproval, that will constitute a disapproval of a required plan 
element under part D of title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month 
clock for sanctions, see section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for 
a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In IDEQ's April 25, 2017 commitment letter, IDEQ committed 
to submit revisions by August 1, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in 
Idaho and is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA 
or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In 
those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal 
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2017. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: July 24, 2017.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart N--Idaho

0
2. In Sec.  52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an 
additional entry at the end of the table for ``Fine Particulate Matter 
Attainment Plan.''
    The addition reads as follows:


Sec.  52.670  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

[[Page 37027]]



                    EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable
     Name of SIP provision          geographic or         State       EPA approval date          Comments
                                 nonattainment area  submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Fine Particulate Matter          Franklin County,    12/19/2012; 12/ 8/8/2017, [Insert   Approved: moderate area
 Attainment Plan.                 Logan UT-ID PM2.5         24/2014   Federal Register    attainment
                                  Nonattainment                       citation].          demonstration and 2014
                                  Area.                                                   reasonable further
                                                                                          progress motor vehicle
                                                                                          emissions budgets.
                                                                                          Conditional Approval:
                                                                                          reasonable further
                                                                                          progress, quantitative
                                                                                          milestone, motor
                                                                                          vehicle emission
                                                                                          budget requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-16614 Filed 8-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.