Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5, 37025-37027 [2017-16614]
Download as PDF
37025
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
State submittal
date
EPA
approval
date
Explanation
Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada 1
*
*
Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (October 2009), excluding
the BART determination for NOX at
Reid Gardner Generating Station in
sections 5.5.3, 5.6.3 and 7.2, which
the EPA has disapproved.
Nevada Regional Haze Plan 5-Year
Progress Report.
*
*
State-wide ..............
*
11/18/09
State-wide ..............
11/18/2014
*
*
*
*
77 FR 50936 (8/23/
12).
*
*
Excluding Appendix A (‘‘Nevada BART
Regulation’’). The Nevada BART regulation, including NAC 445B.029,
445B.22095, and 445B.22096, is listed above in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).
[Insert Federal
Register citation], 8/8/2017.
*
*
*
1 The
organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada’s original 1972 SIP, which was divided into 12
sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans, are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small
Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or
quasi-regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).
3. Section 52.1488 is amended by
adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1488
Visibility protection.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Approval. On November 18, 2014,
the Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection submitted the ‘‘Nevada
Regional Haze Plan 5-Year Progress
Report’’ (‘‘Progress Report’’). The
Progress Report meets the requirements
of the Regional Haze Rule in 40 CFR
51.308.
[FR Doc. 2017–16491 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0067; FRL–9965–67–
Region 10]
Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/
Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to
Idaho’s State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted in 2012 and 2014 to address
Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for
the Idaho portion of the Logan, UtahIdaho fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (Logan UT–ID area).
Based on newly available air quality
monitoring data, the EPA is approving
Idaho’s attainment demonstration and
approving Idaho’s 2014 Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
progress budgets. Additionally, the EPA
is conditionally approving Reasonable
Further Progress (RFP), Quantitative
Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs
for the Idaho portion of the
nonattainment area, based on Idaho’s
commitment to adopt and submit
updates to these attainment plan
elements within one year of the effective
date of this final action.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0067. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and is publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at EPA
Region 10, Office of Air and Waste, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air
and Waste (OAW–150), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200
Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
98101; telephone number: (206) 553–
0256; email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On June 1, 2017, the EPA proposed to
approve Idaho’s attainment
demonstration and 2014 MVEBs as early
progress budgets (82 FR 25208). As part
of the same action, the EPA also
proposed to conditionally approve RFP,
QMs, and revised MVEBs for the Idaho
portion of the nonattainment area. An
explanation of the CAA requirements, a
detailed analysis of the submittals, and
the EPA’s reasons for proposing
approval were provided in the notice of
proposed rulemaking, and will not be
restated here. The public comment
period for the proposal ended July 3,
2017. We received no comments.
II. Final Action
For the reasons set forth in the
proposed rulemaking for this action, the
EPA is approving the attainment
demonstration in Idaho’s 2012 and 2014
revisions to the SIP (Idaho attainment
plan) for the Idaho portion of the Logan
UT–ID area. The EPA is also approving
the 2014 MVEBs as early progress
budgets, in that they are consistent with
making progress toward attainment of
the 24-hour 2006 PM2.5 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards by
December 31, 2015. Lastly, the EPA is
conditionally approving RFP, QMs, and
revised MVEBs in the Idaho attainment
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
37026
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
plan, based on Idaho’s April 25, 2017
commitment to adopt and submit
updated plan elements to meet these
requirements. Under a conditional
approval, the State must adopt and
submit the specific revisions it has
committed to by a date certain but not
later than one year of this final action.1
If the EPA fully approves the submittal
of the revisions specified in the
commitment letter, the conditional
nature of the approval would be
removed and the submittal would
become fully approved. If the State does
not submit these revisions by the date
specified in the April 25, 2017
commitment letter, or if the EPA finds
the State’s revisions to be incomplete, or
EPA disapproves the State’s revisions, a
conditional approval will convert to a
disapproval. If any of these occur and
the EPA’s conditional approval converts
to a disapproval, that will constitute a
disapproval of a required plan element
under part D of title I of the Act, which
starts an 18-month clock for sanctions,
see section 179(a)(2), and the two-year
clock for a Federal Implementation Plan
(FIP), see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
III. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
IDEQ’s April 25, 2017 commitment letter,
IDEQ committed to submit revisions by August 1,
2018.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
1 In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in Idaho
and is also not approved to apply in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by October 10, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: July 24, 2017.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an additional
entry at the end of the table for ‘‘Fine
Particulate Matter Attainment Plan.’’
The addition reads as follows:
■
§ 52.670
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
37027
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Name of SIP provision
*
Fine Particulate Matter
Attainment Plan.
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
*
*
Franklin County, Logan
UT–ID PM2.5 Nonattainment Area.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 25
[IB Docket No. 06–123, FCC 17–49]
Establishment of Policies and Service
Rules for the Broadcasting-Satellite
Service at the 17.3–17.8 GHz and the
24.75–25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for
Feeder Links to the BroadcastingSatellite Service and for Satellite
Services Operating Bi-Directionally
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission adopts technical rules to
mitigate ground-path interference
between the Digital Broadcasting
Satellite Service (DBS) and the
Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) in
the 17.3–17.8 GHz band to protect
consumers and foster more rapid
deployment of services, greater
investment, and new innovation.
DATES: Effective September 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean O’More, 202–418–2453, or if
concerning the information collections
in this document, Cathy Williams, 202–
418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Third
Report and Order, FCC 17–49, adopted
April 21, 2017, and released April 25,
2017. The full text of the Report and
Order is available at https://
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/
FCC-17-49A1.pdf. It also are available
for inspection and copying during
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities, send an email
to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
12/19/2012;
12/24/2014
EPA approval date
Comments
*
*
8/8/2017, [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
Approved: moderate area attainment demonstration and 2014 reasonable further
progress motor vehicle emissions budgets.
Conditional Approval: reasonable further
progress, quantitative milestone, motor vehicle emission budget requirements.
& Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).
[FR Doc. 2017–16614 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
State submittal
date
Synopsis
This Report and Order adopts new
rules to mitigate interference from DBS
feeder-link earth stations to BSS
consumer earth terminals (ground path
interference) in the 17.3–17.8 GHz band.
We adopt a rule allowing currentlylicensed DBS feeder link earth stations
to continue operations under the terms
of their current licenses, and to expand
their facilities provided that new
antennas are constructed within one
kilometer of current antennas and the
aggregate power-flux density of the
station at any point does not increase.
We adopt a methodology for
determining a coordination zone for
new DBS feeder-link earth stations, and
require applicants for new DBS feederlink earth stations to coordinate with
BSS licensees to achieve agreement on
interference mitigation. We adopt rules
specifying the information applicants
for new DBS feeder-link earth stations
must provide for the purposes of
coordination.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains new and
modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. It will be submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review under section 3507(d)
of the PRA. OMB, the general public,
and other Federal agencies will be
invited to comment on the new or
modified information collection
requirements contained in this
proceeding in a separate Federal
Register notice.
Pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4),
we previously sought specific comment
on how the Commission might further
reduce the information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees. We received
no comments on this issue. We have
assessed the effects of the revisions
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adopted that might impose information
collection burdens on small business
concerns, and find that the impact on
businesses with fewer than 25
employees will be an overall reduction
in burden.
Congressional Review Act
The Commission will send copies of
this Report and Order to Congress and
the General Accountability Office
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), and will send
a copy including the final regulatory
flexibility act analysis to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration, in accordance
with section 603(a) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
(1981).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
was incorporated in the Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in the Matter of
Comprehensive Review of Licensing
and Operating Rules for Satellite
Services. The Commission sought
written public comment on the
proposals in the NPRM, including
comment on the IRFA. No comments
were received on the IRFA. This Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
conforms to the RFA.
Need for, and Objectives of, the Rules
The objective of the Report and Order
is to adopt processing and service rules
for the 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite
Service (BSS) which will address
potential interference scenarios which
arise in the reverse band operating
environment. The rules will mitigate
against ground path interference.
Specifically, we adopt criteria to
facilitate sharing in the 17 GHz bands by
BSS and Direct Broadcast Satellite
(DBS) services. These new rules will
introduce a new generation of
broadband services to the public,
providing a mix of local and domestic
video, audio, data, video-on-demand,
and multimedia services to consumers
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37025-37027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16614]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0067; FRL-9965-67-Region 10]
Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment
Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
revisions to Idaho's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in 2012
and 2014 to address Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for the Idaho
portion of the Logan, Utah-Idaho fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) nonattainment area (Logan UT-ID area). Based on
newly available air quality monitoring data, the EPA is approving
Idaho's attainment demonstration and approving Idaho's 2014 Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early progress budgets.
Additionally, the EPA is conditionally approving Reasonable Further
Progress (RFP), Quantitative Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs for
the Idaho portion of the nonattainment area, based on Idaho's
commitment to adopt and submit updates to these attainment plan
elements within one year of the effective date of this final action.
DATES: This final rule is effective September 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0067. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and is publicly
available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials
are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at EPA Region 10, Office
of Air and Waste, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The EPA
requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office
of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10,
1200 Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206)
553-0256; email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On June 1, 2017, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho's attainment
demonstration and 2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets (82 FR 25208).
As part of the same action, the EPA also proposed to conditionally
approve RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs for the Idaho portion of the
nonattainment area. An explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed
analysis of the submittals, and the EPA's reasons for proposing
approval were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking, and will
not be restated here. The public comment period for the proposal ended
July 3, 2017. We received no comments.
II. Final Action
For the reasons set forth in the proposed rulemaking for this
action, the EPA is approving the attainment demonstration in Idaho's
2012 and 2014 revisions to the SIP (Idaho attainment plan) for the
Idaho portion of the Logan UT-ID area. The EPA is also approving the
2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets, in that they are consistent with
making progress toward attainment of the 24-hour 2006 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards by December 31, 2015. Lastly,
the EPA is conditionally approving RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs in the
Idaho attainment
[[Page 37026]]
plan, based on Idaho's April 25, 2017 commitment to adopt and submit
updated plan elements to meet these requirements. Under a conditional
approval, the State must adopt and submit the specific revisions it has
committed to by a date certain but not later than one year of this
final action.\1\ If the EPA fully approves the submittal of the
revisions specified in the commitment letter, the conditional nature of
the approval would be removed and the submittal would become fully
approved. If the State does not submit these revisions by the date
specified in the April 25, 2017 commitment letter, or if the EPA finds
the State's revisions to be incomplete, or EPA disapproves the State's
revisions, a conditional approval will convert to a disapproval. If any
of these occur and the EPA's conditional approval converts to a
disapproval, that will constitute a disapproval of a required plan
element under part D of title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month
clock for sanctions, see section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for
a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In IDEQ's April 25, 2017 commitment letter, IDEQ committed
to submit revisions by August 1, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Idaho and is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA
or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In
those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 24, 2017.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
additional entry at the end of the table for ``Fine Particulate Matter
Attainment Plan.''
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 37027]]
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or State EPA approval date Comments
nonattainment area submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Fine Particulate Matter Franklin County, 12/19/2012; 12/ 8/8/2017, [Insert Approved: moderate area
Attainment Plan. Logan UT-ID PM2.5 24/2014 Federal Register attainment
Nonattainment citation]. demonstration and 2014
Area. reasonable further
progress motor vehicle
emissions budgets.
Conditional Approval:
reasonable further
progress, quantitative
milestone, motor
vehicle emission
budget requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-16614 Filed 8-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P