Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Dental and Oral Conditions, 36080-36086 [2017-16132]
Download as PDF
36080
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL WI D Mosinee, WI [Amended]
Central Wisconsin Airport, WI
(Lat. 44°46′39″ N., long. 89°40′00″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 3,800 feet MSL
within a 4.5-mile radius of Central Wisconsin
Airport. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by Notice to Airmen.
The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace
Designated as Surface Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL WI E2 Mosinee, WI [Amended]
Central Wisconsin Airport, WI
(Lat. 44°46′39″ N., long. 89°40′00″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 4.5-mile radius of Central
Wisconsin Airport. This Class E airspace area
is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL WI E5 Mosinee, WI [Amended]
Central Wisconsin Airport, WI
(Lat. 44°46′39″ N., long. 89°40′00″ W.)
Wausau VORTAC
(Lat. 44°50′48″ N., long. 89°35′12″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of the Central Wisconsin Airport, and within
3.3 miles each side of the 350° bearing from
the airport extending from the 7-mile radius
to 12.3 miles north of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on July 27,
2017.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2017–16284 Filed 8–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
RIN 2900–AP08
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Dental
and Oral Conditions
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Schedule for Rating Disabilities by
revising the portion of the schedule that
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
addresses dental and oral conditions.
The effect of this action is to ensure that
the rating schedule uses current medical
terminology and to provide detailed and
updated criteria for evaluation of dental
and oral conditions for disability rating
purposes.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ioulia Vvedenskaya, M.D., M.B.A.,
Medical Officer, Part 4 VASRD
Regulations Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9700
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA
published a proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register at 80 FR 44913 on July
28, 2015, to amend the portion of the
VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities
(VASRD or rating schedule) dealing
with dental and oral conditions. VA
provided a 60-day public comment
period and interested persons were
invited to submit written comments on
or before September 28, 2015. VA
received 5 comments.
One commenter suggested further
defining the description of mandibular
and maxillary malunion and maxillary
non-union based on the degree of open
bite under diagnostic codes 9904 and
9916. However, the severity of
mandibular and maxillary displacement
and its effect on anterior or posterior
open bite depend on an individual’s
functional anatomy. Therefore, different
veterans with the same degree of
displacement would present with
different degrees of open bite. A
qualified dental provider such as a
dentist or oral surgeon would
appropriately determine the degree of
severity in each individual case.
Further, rather than basing the severity
of open bite on a range of numerical
values, it is standard practice for such
dental providers to assess the degree of
severity as severe, moderate, mild, or
not causing open bite.
Additionally, the commenter
suggested defining moderate and severe
anterior or posterior open bite and mild
anterior or posterior open bite.
Similarly, due to the variances between
individuals’ facial anatomy, it would be
improper to use exact numerical values
to determine the degree of moderate and
severe anterior or posterior open bite
and mild anterior or posterior open bite.
A qualified dental provider would
appropriately measure and record these
findings. Therefore, VA makes no
changes based on these comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The same commenter had a question
about why only a 20 percent rating is
warranted for severe anterior or
posterior open bite due to mandibular
malunion and a 30 percent rating is
warranted for severe anterior or
posterior open bite due to maxillary
malunion, while moderate anterior or
posterior open bite warrants 10 percent
ratings for both conditions. These
variations in disability compensation
are based on the differences in
functional impairment due to maxillary
and mandibular fractures. Unlike
mandibular fracture and its residuals,
maxillary fracture presents a more
challenging case for repair and
rehabilitation. For example, unlike
mandibular fractures, maxillary
fractures often communicate with
sinuses and/or combine with orbital
fractures. Such fractures are
predisposed to contamination, sinus
infection, and obstruction. Even after
following treatment guidelines,
significant bony resorption may occur
leading to cosmetic contour deformity.
Further, although such residuals of
maxillary fracture raise the potential for
pyramiding, such a situation is
addressed by the new note (2) to § 4.150,
which directs raters to separately
evaluate other impairments under the
appropriate diagnostic code. Therefore,
the functional impairment due to
maxillary fracture significantly differs
from mandibular fractures. VA took
these functional anatomy differences
and the resultant differences in
functional impairment into
consideration during the revision
process.
Additionally, the commenter noted
that mandibular malunion and
maxillary malunion and non-union do
not have the same choices of severity of
anterior or posterior open bite. Once
more, these differences are based on
differences in the functional anatomy of
maxillas and mandibles and standard
clinical assessments by a qualified
dental provider. Therefore, VA makes
no changes based on these comments.
Multiple commenters asked for
additional guidance in assessing
interincisal measurements of maximum
unassisted vertical opening under
diagnostic code 9905. One commenter
stated that guidance was needed on how
to handle measurements that fall
between the specific numbers. Another
commenter suggested adding the phrase
‘‘or less’’ to the whole numbers listed in
the proposed rule or using a range of
numbers, such as from 21 to 29
millimeters. VA applied a standard
scale for the measurement of interincisal
ranges, vertical and lateral, based on the
Guidelines to the Evaluation of
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Impairment of the Oral and
Maxillofacial Region by the American
Association of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgeons. Guidelines to the Evaluation
of Impairment of the Oral and
Maxillofacial Region, American
Association of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgeons can be found at https://
www.astmjs.org/impairment.html. VA
agrees that for the sake of clarity, a full
range of maximum unassisted vertical
opening should be included and makes
appropriate edits to diagnostic code
9905.
One commenter stated that VA should
address bruxism and its relationship to
temporomandibular joint disorder in a
note to diagnostic code 9905.
Specifically, the commenter stated that
VA’s treatment of bruxism as only a
secondary condition and not a stand
alone disability is problematic with
regards to claims for dental treatment.
The commenter recommended
amending 38 CFR 3.381 to clarify the
treatment of bruxism in regards to
service connection for dental treatment
or to add to diagnostic code 9905 the
phrase ‘‘with or without bruxism.’’ The
commenter also recommended rating
bruxism as a stand alone issue.
However, bruxism is considered a
symptom of craniomandibular
disorders, of which temporomandibular
disorders are a subset; other symptoms
of craniomandibular disorders include
anxiety, stress, and other mental
disorders (Shetty, Shilpa et al., Bruxism:
A Literature Review, J Indian
Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Sep; 10(3): 141–
148., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pmc/articles/PMC3081266/). Therefore,
it is not appropriate to place bruxism as
a separate diagnosis or a symptom
under diagnostic code 9905. VA has
determined that only secondary service
connection for treatment purposes is
warranted for this condition, both
because it is only a secondary condition,
not a primary condition, and because its
symptoms are already contemplated by
the underlying condition for which the
veteran is being compensated. Thus, it
does not require a separate diagnostic
code, and VA makes no changes based
on this comment.
One commenter had a question about
why diagnostic codes 9901, 9908, 9909,
9913, 9914, and 9915 were missing from
the discussion. VA did not propose any
changes to these diagnostic codes.
According to the Federal Register
Document Drafting Handbook Rule 1.14,
this was noted by inserting asterisks in
place of unchanged diagnostic codes.
Therefore, VA makes no changes based
on this comment.
The same commenter proposed to rate
maxillary and mandibular malunion
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
and non-union exactly the same way,
regardless of which bone is affected.
However, the functional impairment
due to mandibular malunion and nonunion significantly differs from
maxillary malunion and non-union. VA
took these differences in functional
anatomy and the resultant differences in
functional impairment into
consideration during the revision
process. Therefore, VA makes no
changes based on this comment.
One commenter was supportive of the
overall changes and additions to this
section of the rating schedule. However,
the commenter stated that a serviceconnected noncompensable rating for a
dental disability inappropriately
restricts the ability of a recently
discharged veteran whose eligibility for
outpatient dental services is based on 38
CFR 17.161(b) [Class II] to receive
appropriate dental services and
appliances. To illustrate, the commenter
stated that the dental rating schedule
provides for a diagnosis of ‘‘loss of
teeth, replaceable by prosthesis’’ with
diagnostic code 9913. Because the
schedule considers this to be a
noncompenable disability, the veteran is
limited to receiving one-time treatment
for this condition under 38 CFR
17.161(b). The commenter described
why this is not a suitable clinical
response for the veteran, especially over
the veteran’s life-time. Specifically, the
commenter stated that the provision of
dentures has historically been, and
continues to be, VA’s treatment
response for this condition, even though
(1) modern dentistry, as practiced in the
community, goes beyond this, offering
partial dentures, implants, bridges,
crowns, and other prostheses, and (2)
the use of dentures may be
inappropriate and more harmful to the
future dental health of the veteran (e.g.,
where their use, to address a lost tooth,
requires the removal of other healthy
teeth to fit them). Moreover, this
commenter stated that limiting this
veteran to one-time treatment for this
condition is outdated and a disservice to
the veteran, further noting that, even
were these newer treatment options
available to this cohort, the one-time
limitation would still be unreasonable
because these newer options typically
require replacement after several years.
The commenter believes all of these
problems would be remedied by either
ensuring that this dental condition
(diagnostic code 9913) is changed to
reflect a compensable rating for veterans
who experience complications of
treatment, such as inability to load the
prosthesis, diminished vocal projection,
chronic pain, or peri-implantitis. In the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36081
alternative, this particular dental
condition/diagnosis could be excepted
from the one-time treatment limitation
under § 17.161(b). Lastly, this
commenter suggested adding a general
note under 38 CFR 4.150 to allow for
analogous compensable ratings for any
dental disabilities service-connected (or
treated as service-connected under 38
U.S.C. 1151) which require ongoing
treatment.
Veterans with a service-connected
compensable dental condition are
eligible for any outpatient dental
treatment indicated as reasonably
necessary to maintain oral health and
masticatory function, with no time
limits for making application for
treatment and no restrictions as to the
number of repeat episodes of treatment
under 38 CFR 17.161(a). In addition,
other veteran-cohorts are eligible for
outpatient dental treatment as specified
in § 17.161. Under § 17.161(b) [Class II],
a veteran’s eligibility for the one-time
correction of a service-connected
noncompensable dental condition is
available to certain veterans who have
been recently discharged or released
from active service, if specified
requirements, including timely filing of
the dental application, are met. (No
rating action is needed for Class II
applicants if the conditions set forth in
38 CFR 17.162 are met).
While we appreciate the arguments
raised by the commenter and his
advocacy efforts on behalf of the
members of his organization, this
rulemaking does not seek to revise
diagnostic code 9913, as it applies to the
loss of teeth, replaceable by prosthesis.
As such, these comments go beyond the
scope of this rulemaking, which is
focused on other codes in the dental
rating schedule. Further, a veteran’s
Class II eligibility for outpatient dental
services and applicances is not based on
the level of functional impairment for
which the Veteran is compensated
under 38 CFR part 4. Ratings provided
for service-connected conditions under
38 CFR part 4 serve solely to
compensate veterans for functional
impairment resulting from diseases and
injuries and any residuals. In addition,
VA has determined that the dental
conditions contemplated by § 17.161(b)
do not, in general, result in functional
impairment. Indeed, VA experts
recently carefully considered this very
issue as part of an independent
undertaking, but they concluded that
while such a change would serve a great
convenience to affected veterans, no
clinical justification exists to change the
non-compensable designation given to
conditions under diagnostic code 9913,
to include loss of teeth, replaceable by
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
36082
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
prosthesis. Moreover, the commenter’s
broader suggested amendments to VA’s
outpatient treatment dental regulations
likewise go beyond the scope of this
immediate rulemaking, which again is
focused on limited components of the
dental rating schedule. Finally, we note
that the eligibility criteria set forth in
§ 17.161(b) are based in law, 38 U.S.C.
1712(a)(1)(B), (b), and so cannot be
changed via rulemaking. As a result of
all these factors, no changes to VA’s
outpatient dental regulations are made
in response to this commenter’s
comments related to diagnostic code
9913.
The same commenter was supportive
of the overall changes and additions to
diagnostic codes 9904 and 9916.
However, the commenter was concerned
about inter-examiner and inter-rater
reliability due to the descriptors of open
bite, noting that vague descriptors could
result in under-evaluation or
pyramiding. As discussed above, due to
the variances between individuals’
facial anatomy, it would be improper to
use exact numerical values to determine
the degree of moderate and severe
anterior or posterior open bite and mild
anterior or posterior open bite. Further,
the potential for pyramiding is
addressed by the new note (2) to § 4.150,
which directs raters to separately
evaluate other impairments under the
appropriate diagnostic code.
Additionally, VA took differences in
functional anatomy of maxillas and
mandibles into consideration during the
revision process. Therefore, VA makes
no changes based on this comment.
One commenter urged VA to include
periodontal disease as a compensable
condition and amend 38 CFR 3.381
accordingly. The commenter stated that
periodontal disease has been linked to
diabetes as well as other conditions, and
veterans who have service-connected
diabetes as a result of herbicide
exposure are not able to receive dental
treatment unless their overall disability
rating is 100 percent. The commenter
stated that assigning a compensable
disability rating for periodontal disease
or providing for a compensable rating as
a secondary disability associated with
service-connected diabetes would
alleviate the lack of treatment issue for
veterans. As noted previously, the
ratings under 38 CFR part 4 serve to
compensate for functional impairment.
VA has determined that periodontal
disease does not result in loss of earning
capacity resulting from functional
impairment, so no changes have been
made to make this condition
compensable. Therefore, VA makes no
changes based on these comments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
VA is correcting typographical errors
under DC 9905 and DC 9916. With
respect to DC 9905, in the proposed
rulemaking notice, for the 50 percent
evaluation, VA referred to mechanically
altered food instead of mechanically
altered foods. With respect to DC 9916,
in the explanatory note for disability
rating personnel, VA failed to include
the phrase ‘‘following treatment’’
between ‘‘maxilla fragments’’ and the
parenthetical. VA is correcting these
errors in this final rule.
VA appreciates the comments
submitted in response to the proposed
rulemaking notice. Based on the
rationale stated in the proposed
rulemaking notice and in this
document, the final rule is adopted with
the changes noted.
Effective Date of Final Rule
Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) personnel utilize the Veterans
Benefit Management System for Rating
(VBMS–R) to process disability
compensation claims that involve
disability evaluations made under the
VASRD. In order to ensure that there is
no delay in processing veterans’ claims,
VA must coordinate the effective date of
this final rule with corresponding
VBMS–R system updates. As such, this
final rule will apply effective September
10, 2017, the date VBMS–R system
updates related to this final rule will be
complete.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined, and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. VA’s
impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of this
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s Web site at https://
www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published
From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to
Date.’’
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule
will not affect any small entities. Only
certain VA beneficiaries could be
directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits;
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
36083
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 27, 2017.
Michael Shores,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management,
Office of the Secretary, Department of
Veterans Affairs.
64.104, Pension for Non-ServiceConnected Disability for Veterans;
64.109, Veterans Compensation for
Service-Connected Disability; and
64.110, Veterans Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation for Service
Connected Death.
Subpart B—Disability Ratings
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
2. Amend § 4.150 by:
a. Adding Notes 1 and 2 at the
beginning of the table;
■ b. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 9900 and 9902 through 9905;
■ c. Removing the entries for diagnostic
codes 9906 and 9907;
■ d. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 9911;
■ e. Removing entry for diagnostic code
9912;
■ f. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 9916; and
■ g. Adding, in numerical order, entries
for diagnostic codes 9917 and 9918.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless
otherwise noted.
§ 4.150 Schedule of ratings—dental and
oral conditions.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Signing Authority
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on July 21,
2017, for publication.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 4 as
follows:
PART 4—SCHEDULE FOR RATING
DISABILITIES
■
■
■
Rating
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Note (1): For VA compensation purposes, diagnostic imaging studies include, but are not limited to, conventional radiography
(X-ray), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), radionuclide
bone scanning, or ultrasonography.
Note (2): Separately evaluate loss of vocal articulation, loss of smell, loss of taste, neurological impairment, respiratory dysfunction, and other impairments under the appropriate diagnostic code and combine under § 4.25 for each separately rated condition.
9900 Maxilla or mandible, chronic osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis or osteoradionecrosis of:
Rate as osteomyelitis, chronic under diagnostic code 5000.
*
*
*
*
*
*
9902 Mandible, loss of, including ramus, unilaterally or bilaterally:
Loss of one-half or more,
Involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis ........................................................................................................................................
Replaceable by prosthesis .............................................................................................................................................
Not involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis ........................................................................................................................................
Replaceable by prosthesis .............................................................................................................................................
Loss of less than one-half,
Involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis ........................................................................................................................................
Replaceable by prosthesis .............................................................................................................................................
Not involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis ........................................................................................................................................
Replaceable by prosthesis .............................................................................................................................................
9903 Mandible, nonunion of, confirmed by diagnostic imaging studies:
Severe, with false motion .............................................................................................................................................................
Moderate, without false motion ....................................................................................................................................................
9904 Mandible, malunion of:
Displacement, causing severe anterior or posterior open bite ....................................................................................................
Displacement, causing moderate anterior or posterior open bite ................................................................................................
Displacement, not causing anterior or posterior open bite ..........................................................................................................
9905 Temporomandibular disorder (TMD):
Interincisal range:
0 to 10 millimeters (mm) of maximum unassisted vertical opening.
With dietary restrictions to all mechanically altered foods .............................................................................................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically altered foods ............................................................................................
11 to 20 mm of maximum unassisted vertical opening.
With dietary restrictions to all mechanically altered foods .............................................................................................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically altered foods ............................................................................................
21 to 29 mm of maximum unassisted vertical opening.
With dietary restrictions to full liquid and pureed foods .................................................................................................
With dietary restrictions to soft and semi-solid foods ....................................................................................................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically altered foods ............................................................................................
30 to 34 mm of maximum unassisted vertical opening.
With dietary restrictions to full liquid and pureed foods .................................................................................................
With dietary restrictions to soft and semi-solid foods ....................................................................................................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically altered foods ............................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
*
70
50
40
30
70
50
20
10
30
10
20
10
0
50
40
40
30
40
30
20
30
20
10
36084
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Rating
Lateral excursion range of motion:
0 to 4 mm .......................................................................................................................................................................
Note (1): Ratings for limited interincisal movement shall not be combined with ratings for limited lateral excursion.
Note (2): For VA compensation purposes, the normal maximum unassisted range of vertical jaw opening is from 35 to 50 mm.
Note (3): For VA compensation purposes, mechanically altered foods are defined as altered by blending, chopping, grinding or
mashing so that they are easy to chew and swallow. There are four levels of mechanically altered foods: full liquid, puree,
soft, and semisolid foods. To warrant elevation based on mechanically altered foods, the use of texture-modified diets must
be recorded or verified by a physician.
10
*
*
*
*
*
*
Hard palate, loss of:
Loss of half or more, not replaceable by prosthesis .....................................................................................................
Loss of less than half, not replaceable by prosthesis ...................................................................................................
Loss of half or more, replaceable by prosthesis ............................................................................................................
Loss of less than half, replaceable by prosthesis ..........................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
9916 Maxilla, malunion or nonunion of:
Nonunion,
With false motion ...................................................................................................................................................................
Without false motion ..............................................................................................................................................................
Malunion,
With displacement, causing severe anterior or posterior open bite .....................................................................................
With displacement, causing moderate anterior or posterior open bite .................................................................................
With displacement, causing mild anterior or posterior open bite ..........................................................................................
Note: For VA compensation purposes, the severity of maxillary nonunion is dependent upon the degree of abnormal mobility of
maxilla fragments following treatment (i.e., presence or absence of false motion), and maxillary nonunion must be confirmed
by diagnostic imaging studies.
9917 Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, benign:
Rate as loss of supporting structures (bone or teeth) and/or functional impairment due to scarring.
9918 Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, malignant .............................................................................................................................
Note: A rating of 100 percent shall continue beyond the cessation of any surgical, radiation, antineoplastic chemotherapy or
other therapeutic procedure. Six months after discontinuance of such treatment, the appropriate disability rating shall be determined by mandatory VA examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that or any subsequent examination shall be
subject to the provisions of § 3.105(e) of this chapter. If there has been no local recurrence or metastasis, rate on residuals
such as loss of supporting structures (bone or teeth) and/or functional impairment due to scarring.
*
9911
3. Amend appendix A to part 4 by:
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 9900, 9902, and 9903;
■ b. Adding, in numerical order, an
entry for diagnostic code 9904;
■ c. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 9905;
■
■
Sec.
d. Adding, in numerical order, entries
for diagnostic codes 9906, 9907, 9911,
and 9912;
■ e. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 9916; and
■ f. Adding, in numerical order, entries
for diagnostic codes 9917 and 9918.
■
30
20
10
0
30
10
30
10
0
100
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Appendix A to Part 4—Table of
Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
Diagnostic
Code No.
*
9900
*
*
*
*
Criterion September 22, 1978; criterion February 17, 1994; title September 10, 2017.
*
*
9902
9903
9904
9905
9906
9907
*
*
*
*
*
Criterion February 17, 1994; evaluation September 10, 2017; title September 10, 2017.
Criterion February 17, 1994; evaluation September 10, 2017; title September 10, 2017.
Criterion September 10, 2017.
Criterion September 22, 1978; evaluation February 17, 1994; evaluation September 10, 2017; title September
10, 2017.
Removed September 10, 2017.
Removed September 10, 2017.
*
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
*
*
9911
9912
*
*
Criterion and title September 10, 2017.
Removed September 10, 2017.
*
*
*
*
*
9916
9917
9918
*
*
*
Added February 17, 1994; criterion September 10, 2017.
Added September 10, 2017.
Added September 10, 2017.
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
*
36085
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
4. Amend appendix B to part 4 by:
■ a. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 9900, 9902, 9903, and 9905;
■ b. Removing the entries for diagnostic
codes 9906 and 9907;
■
c. Revising the entry for diagnostic
code 9911;
■ d. Removing the entry for diagnostic
code 9912; and
■ e. Adding, in numerical order, entries
for diagnostic codes 9917 and 9918.
■
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Appendix B to Part 4—Numerical Index
of Disabilities
Diagnostic
Code No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dental and Oral Conditions
9900 ...............
Maxilla or mandible, chronic osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, or osteoradionecrosis of.
*
9902 ...............
9903 ...............
*
*
*
Mandible loss of, including ramus, unilaterally or bilaterally.
Mandible, nonunion of, confirmed by diagnostic imaging studies.
*
*
*
*
9905 ...............
*
*
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD).
*
*
*
*
*
9911 ...............
*
Hard palate, loss of.
*
*
*
*
*
9917 ...............
9918 ...............
*
*
Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, benign.
Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, malignant.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend appendix C to part 4 as
follows:
■ a. Under the entry for ‘‘Limitation of
motion,’’ remove the entry for
‘‘Temporomandibular articulation’’ and
add in its place an entry for
‘‘Temporomandibular’’;
■ b. Under the entry for ‘‘Loss of,’’ add
in alphabetical order an entry for
‘‘Palate, hard’’;
■ c. Revise the entry for ‘‘Mandible’’;
■
d. Add in alphabetical order an entry
for ‘‘Maxilla or mandible, chronic
osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, or
osteoradionecrosis of’’;
■ e. Remove the entries for ‘‘Palate,
hard’’ and ‘‘Ramus’’ located below the
entry for ‘‘Nose, part of, or scars’’ and
above the entry for ‘‘Skull, part of’’;
■ f. Under the entry for ‘‘Neoplasms,’’
under both ‘‘Benign’’ and ‘‘Malignant,’’
add in alphabetical order an entry for
‘‘Hard and soft tissue’’;
■
g. Under the entry for ‘‘Nonunion,’’
remove the entry for ‘‘Mandible’’ and
add in its place an entry for ‘‘Mandible,
confirmed by diagnostic imaging
studies’’;
■ h. Remove the entry for
‘‘Osteomyelitis maxilla or mandible’’.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 4—Alphabetical
Index of Disabilities
Diagnostic
Code No.
*
Limitation of motion:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Temporomandibular ......................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
9905
*
Loss of:
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
*
Palate, hard ..................................................................................................................................................................................
* * * *.
Mandible:
Including ramus, unilaterally or bilaterally ....................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Maxilla or mandible, chronic osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, or osteoradionecrosis of .................................................................
*
*
Neoplasms:
Benign:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Hard and soft tissue ..............................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
9911
9902
9900
*
*
9917
36086
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Diagnostic
Code No.
*
Malignant:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Hard and soft tissue ..............................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Nonunion:
Mandible, confirmed by diagnostic imaging studies .....................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0676; FRL–9961–69]
A. Does this action apply to me?
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of ethaboxam in
or on Ginseng; Pepper/eggplant,
subgroup 8–10B; Vegetable, cucurbit,
group 9; and Vegetable, tuberous and
corm, subgroup 1C. Valent USA
Corporation requested these tolerances
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 3, 2017. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before October 2, 2017, and must be
filed in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0676, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
13:28 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
Mike Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Ethaboxam; Pesticide Tolerances
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2017–16132 Filed 8–2–17; 8:45 am]
ADDRESSES:
*
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
9918
9903
*
OPP–2015–0676 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before October 2, 2017. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2015–0676, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of April 25,
2016 (81 FR 24044) (FRL–9944–86),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 5F8383) by Valent
USA Corporation, 1600 Riviera Avenue,
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 148 (Thursday, August 3, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36080-36086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16132]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900-AP08
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Dental and Oral Conditions
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Schedule for Rating Disabilities by revising the portion of the
schedule that addresses dental and oral conditions. The effect of this
action is to ensure that the rating schedule uses current medical
terminology and to provide detailed and updated criteria for evaluation
of dental and oral conditions for disability rating purposes.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ioulia Vvedenskaya, M.D., M.B.A.,
Medical Officer, Part 4 VASRD Regulations Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9700
(This is not a toll-free telephone number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA published a proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register at 80 FR 44913 on July 28, 2015, to amend the portion
of the VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD or rating schedule)
dealing with dental and oral conditions. VA provided a 60-day public
comment period and interested persons were invited to submit written
comments on or before September 28, 2015. VA received 5 comments.
One commenter suggested further defining the description of
mandibular and maxillary malunion and maxillary non-union based on the
degree of open bite under diagnostic codes 9904 and 9916. However, the
severity of mandibular and maxillary displacement and its effect on
anterior or posterior open bite depend on an individual's functional
anatomy. Therefore, different veterans with the same degree of
displacement would present with different degrees of open bite. A
qualified dental provider such as a dentist or oral surgeon would
appropriately determine the degree of severity in each individual case.
Further, rather than basing the severity of open bite on a range of
numerical values, it is standard practice for such dental providers to
assess the degree of severity as severe, moderate, mild, or not causing
open bite.
Additionally, the commenter suggested defining moderate and severe
anterior or posterior open bite and mild anterior or posterior open
bite. Similarly, due to the variances between individuals' facial
anatomy, it would be improper to use exact numerical values to
determine the degree of moderate and severe anterior or posterior open
bite and mild anterior or posterior open bite. A qualified dental
provider would appropriately measure and record these findings.
Therefore, VA makes no changes based on these comments.
The same commenter had a question about why only a 20 percent
rating is warranted for severe anterior or posterior open bite due to
mandibular malunion and a 30 percent rating is warranted for severe
anterior or posterior open bite due to maxillary malunion, while
moderate anterior or posterior open bite warrants 10 percent ratings
for both conditions. These variations in disability compensation are
based on the differences in functional impairment due to maxillary and
mandibular fractures. Unlike mandibular fracture and its residuals,
maxillary fracture presents a more challenging case for repair and
rehabilitation. For example, unlike mandibular fractures, maxillary
fractures often communicate with sinuses and/or combine with orbital
fractures. Such fractures are predisposed to contamination, sinus
infection, and obstruction. Even after following treatment guidelines,
significant bony resorption may occur leading to cosmetic contour
deformity. Further, although such residuals of maxillary fracture raise
the potential for pyramiding, such a situation is addressed by the new
note (2) to Sec. 4.150, which directs raters to separately evaluate
other impairments under the appropriate diagnostic code. Therefore, the
functional impairment due to maxillary fracture significantly differs
from mandibular fractures. VA took these functional anatomy differences
and the resultant differences in functional impairment into
consideration during the revision process.
Additionally, the commenter noted that mandibular malunion and
maxillary malunion and non-union do not have the same choices of
severity of anterior or posterior open bite. Once more, these
differences are based on differences in the functional anatomy of
maxillas and mandibles and standard clinical assessments by a qualified
dental provider. Therefore, VA makes no changes based on these
comments.
Multiple commenters asked for additional guidance in assessing
interincisal measurements of maximum unassisted vertical opening under
diagnostic code 9905. One commenter stated that guidance was needed on
how to handle measurements that fall between the specific numbers.
Another commenter suggested adding the phrase ``or less'' to the whole
numbers listed in the proposed rule or using a range of numbers, such
as from 21 to 29 millimeters. VA applied a standard scale for the
measurement of interincisal ranges, vertical and lateral, based on the
Guidelines to the Evaluation of
[[Page 36081]]
Impairment of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region by the American
Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Guidelines to the
Evaluation of Impairment of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region, American
Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons can be found at https://www.astmjs.org/impairment.html. VA agrees that for the sake of clarity,
a full range of maximum unassisted vertical opening should be included
and makes appropriate edits to diagnostic code 9905.
One commenter stated that VA should address bruxism and its
relationship to temporomandibular joint disorder in a note to
diagnostic code 9905. Specifically, the commenter stated that VA's
treatment of bruxism as only a secondary condition and not a stand
alone disability is problematic with regards to claims for dental
treatment. The commenter recommended amending 38 CFR 3.381 to clarify
the treatment of bruxism in regards to service connection for dental
treatment or to add to diagnostic code 9905 the phrase ``with or
without bruxism.'' The commenter also recommended rating bruxism as a
stand alone issue. However, bruxism is considered a symptom of
craniomandibular disorders, of which temporomandibular disorders are a
subset; other symptoms of craniomandibular disorders include anxiety,
stress, and other mental disorders (Shetty, Shilpa et al., Bruxism: A
Literature Review, J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Sep; 10(3): 141-148.,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081266/). Therefore, it
is not appropriate to place bruxism as a separate diagnosis or a
symptom under diagnostic code 9905. VA has determined that only
secondary service connection for treatment purposes is warranted for
this condition, both because it is only a secondary condition, not a
primary condition, and because its symptoms are already contemplated by
the underlying condition for which the veteran is being compensated.
Thus, it does not require a separate diagnostic code, and VA makes no
changes based on this comment.
One commenter had a question about why diagnostic codes 9901, 9908,
9909, 9913, 9914, and 9915 were missing from the discussion. VA did not
propose any changes to these diagnostic codes. According to the Federal
Register Document Drafting Handbook Rule 1.14, this was noted by
inserting asterisks in place of unchanged diagnostic codes. Therefore,
VA makes no changes based on this comment.
The same commenter proposed to rate maxillary and mandibular
malunion and non-union exactly the same way, regardless of which bone
is affected. However, the functional impairment due to mandibular
malunion and non-union significantly differs from maxillary malunion
and non-union. VA took these differences in functional anatomy and the
resultant differences in functional impairment into consideration
during the revision process. Therefore, VA makes no changes based on
this comment.
One commenter was supportive of the overall changes and additions
to this section of the rating schedule. However, the commenter stated
that a service-connected noncompensable rating for a dental disability
inappropriately restricts the ability of a recently discharged veteran
whose eligibility for outpatient dental services is based on 38 CFR
17.161(b) [Class II] to receive appropriate dental services and
appliances. To illustrate, the commenter stated that the dental rating
schedule provides for a diagnosis of ``loss of teeth, replaceable by
prosthesis'' with diagnostic code 9913. Because the schedule considers
this to be a noncompenable disability, the veteran is limited to
receiving one-time treatment for this condition under 38 CFR 17.161(b).
The commenter described why this is not a suitable clinical response
for the veteran, especially over the veteran's life-time. Specifically,
the commenter stated that the provision of dentures has historically
been, and continues to be, VA's treatment response for this condition,
even though (1) modern dentistry, as practiced in the community, goes
beyond this, offering partial dentures, implants, bridges, crowns, and
other prostheses, and (2) the use of dentures may be inappropriate and
more harmful to the future dental health of the veteran (e.g., where
their use, to address a lost tooth, requires the removal of other
healthy teeth to fit them). Moreover, this commenter stated that
limiting this veteran to one-time treatment for this condition is
outdated and a disservice to the veteran, further noting that, even
were these newer treatment options available to this cohort, the one-
time limitation would still be unreasonable because these newer options
typically require replacement after several years. The commenter
believes all of these problems would be remedied by either ensuring
that this dental condition (diagnostic code 9913) is changed to reflect
a compensable rating for veterans who experience complications of
treatment, such as inability to load the prosthesis, diminished vocal
projection, chronic pain, or peri-implantitis. In the alternative, this
particular dental condition/diagnosis could be excepted from the one-
time treatment limitation under Sec. 17.161(b). Lastly, this commenter
suggested adding a general note under 38 CFR 4.150 to allow for
analogous compensable ratings for any dental disabilities service-
connected (or treated as service-connected under 38 U.S.C. 1151) which
require ongoing treatment.
Veterans with a service-connected compensable dental condition are
eligible for any outpatient dental treatment indicated as reasonably
necessary to maintain oral health and masticatory function, with no
time limits for making application for treatment and no restrictions as
to the number of repeat episodes of treatment under 38 CFR 17.161(a).
In addition, other veteran-cohorts are eligible for outpatient dental
treatment as specified in Sec. 17.161. Under Sec. 17.161(b) [Class
II], a veteran's eligibility for the one-time correction of a service-
connected noncompensable dental condition is available to certain
veterans who have been recently discharged or released from active
service, if specified requirements, including timely filing of the
dental application, are met. (No rating action is needed for Class II
applicants if the conditions set forth in 38 CFR 17.162 are met).
While we appreciate the arguments raised by the commenter and his
advocacy efforts on behalf of the members of his organization, this
rulemaking does not seek to revise diagnostic code 9913, as it applies
to the loss of teeth, replaceable by prosthesis. As such, these
comments go beyond the scope of this rulemaking, which is focused on
other codes in the dental rating schedule. Further, a veteran's Class
II eligibility for outpatient dental services and applicances is not
based on the level of functional impairment for which the Veteran is
compensated under 38 CFR part 4. Ratings provided for service-connected
conditions under 38 CFR part 4 serve solely to compensate veterans for
functional impairment resulting from diseases and injuries and any
residuals. In addition, VA has determined that the dental conditions
contemplated by Sec. 17.161(b) do not, in general, result in
functional impairment. Indeed, VA experts recently carefully considered
this very issue as part of an independent undertaking, but they
concluded that while such a change would serve a great convenience to
affected veterans, no clinical justification exists to change the non-
compensable designation given to conditions under diagnostic code 9913,
to include loss of teeth, replaceable by
[[Page 36082]]
prosthesis. Moreover, the commenter's broader suggested amendments to
VA's outpatient treatment dental regulations likewise go beyond the
scope of this immediate rulemaking, which again is focused on limited
components of the dental rating schedule. Finally, we note that the
eligibility criteria set forth in Sec. 17.161(b) are based in law, 38
U.S.C. 1712(a)(1)(B), (b), and so cannot be changed via rulemaking. As
a result of all these factors, no changes to VA's outpatient dental
regulations are made in response to this commenter's comments related
to diagnostic code 9913.
The same commenter was supportive of the overall changes and
additions to diagnostic codes 9904 and 9916. However, the commenter was
concerned about inter-examiner and inter-rater reliability due to the
descriptors of open bite, noting that vague descriptors could result in
under-evaluation or pyramiding. As discussed above, due to the
variances between individuals' facial anatomy, it would be improper to
use exact numerical values to determine the degree of moderate and
severe anterior or posterior open bite and mild anterior or posterior
open bite. Further, the potential for pyramiding is addressed by the
new note (2) to Sec. 4.150, which directs raters to separately
evaluate other impairments under the appropriate diagnostic code.
Additionally, VA took differences in functional anatomy of maxillas and
mandibles into consideration during the revision process. Therefore, VA
makes no changes based on this comment.
One commenter urged VA to include periodontal disease as a
compensable condition and amend 38 CFR 3.381 accordingly. The commenter
stated that periodontal disease has been linked to diabetes as well as
other conditions, and veterans who have service-connected diabetes as a
result of herbicide exposure are not able to receive dental treatment
unless their overall disability rating is 100 percent. The commenter
stated that assigning a compensable disability rating for periodontal
disease or providing for a compensable rating as a secondary disability
associated with service-connected diabetes would alleviate the lack of
treatment issue for veterans. As noted previously, the ratings under 38
CFR part 4 serve to compensate for functional impairment. VA has
determined that periodontal disease does not result in loss of earning
capacity resulting from functional impairment, so no changes have been
made to make this condition compensable. Therefore, VA makes no changes
based on these comments.
VA is correcting typographical errors under DC 9905 and DC 9916.
With respect to DC 9905, in the proposed rulemaking notice, for the 50
percent evaluation, VA referred to mechanically altered food instead of
mechanically altered foods. With respect to DC 9916, in the explanatory
note for disability rating personnel, VA failed to include the phrase
``following treatment'' between ``maxilla fragments'' and the
parenthetical. VA is correcting these errors in this final rule.
VA appreciates the comments submitted in response to the proposed
rulemaking notice. Based on the rationale stated in the proposed
rulemaking notice and in this document, the final rule is adopted with
the changes noted.
Effective Date of Final Rule
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) personnel utilize the
Veterans Benefit Management System for Rating (VBMS-R) to process
disability compensation claims that involve disability evaluations made
under the VASRD. In order to ensure that there is no delay in
processing veterans' claims, VA must coordinate the effective date of
this final rule with corresponding VBMS-R system updates. As such, this
final rule will apply effective September 10, 2017, the date VBMS-R
system updates related to this final rule will be complete.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document
at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of this
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web site at
https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This final rule will not affect any small entities. Only certain
VA beneficiaries could be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.009, Veterans Medical
Care Benefits;
[[Page 36083]]
64.104, Pension for Non-Service-Connected Disability for Veterans;
64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected Disability; and
64.110, Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation for Service
Connected Death.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S.
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on July 21, 2017, for publication.
Dated: July 27, 2017.
Michael Shores,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions, Veterans.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 4 as
follows:
PART 4--SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart B--Disability Ratings
0
2. Amend Sec. 4.150 by:
0
a. Adding Notes 1 and 2 at the beginning of the table;
0
b. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 9900 and 9902 through
9905;
0
c. Removing the entries for diagnostic codes 9906 and 9907;
0
d. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 9911;
0
e. Removing entry for diagnostic code 9912;
0
f. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 9916; and
0
g. Adding, in numerical order, entries for diagnostic codes 9917 and
9918.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 4.150 Schedule of ratings--dental and oral conditions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): For VA compensation purposes, diagnostic
imaging studies include, but are not limited to,
conventional radiography (X-ray), computed tomography
(CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron
emission tomography (PET), radionuclide bone scanning,
or ultrasonography.....................................
Note (2): Separately evaluate loss of vocal
articulation, loss of smell, loss of taste,
neurological impairment, respiratory dysfunction, and
other impairments under the appropriate diagnostic code
and combine under Sec. 4.25 for each separately rated
condition..............................................
9900 Maxilla or mandible, chronic osteomyelitis,
osteonecrosis or osteoradionecrosis of:
Rate as osteomyelitis, chronic under diagnostic code
5000.
* * * * * * *
9902 Mandible, loss of, including ramus, unilaterally or
bilaterally:
Loss of one-half or more,
Involving temporomandibular articulation........
Not replaceable by prosthesis............... 70
Replaceable by prosthesis................... 50
Not involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis............... 40
Replaceable by prosthesis................... 30
Loss of less than one-half,
Involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis............... 70
Replaceable by prosthesis................... 50
Not involving temporomandibular articulation.
Not replaceable by prosthesis............... 20
Replaceable by prosthesis................... 10
9903 Mandible, nonunion of, confirmed by diagnostic
imaging studies:
Severe, with false motion........................... 30
Moderate, without false motion...................... 10
9904 Mandible, malunion of:
Displacement, causing severe anterior or posterior 20
open bite..........................................
Displacement, causing moderate anterior or posterior 10
open bite..........................................
Displacement, not causing anterior or posterior open 0
bite...............................................
9905 Temporomandibular disorder (TMD):
Interincisal range:
0 to 10 millimeters (mm) of maximum unassisted
vertical opening.
With dietary restrictions to all 50
mechanically altered foods.................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically 40
altered foods..............................
11 to 20 mm of maximum unassisted vertical
opening.
With dietary restrictions to all 40
mechanically altered foods.................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically 30
altered foods..............................
21 to 29 mm of maximum unassisted vertical
opening.
With dietary restrictions to full liquid and 40
pureed foods...............................
With dietary restrictions to soft and semi- 30
solid foods................................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically 20
altered foods..............................
30 to 34 mm of maximum unassisted vertical
opening.
With dietary restrictions to full liquid and 30
pureed foods...............................
With dietary restrictions to soft and semi- 20
solid foods................................
Without dietary restrictions to mechanically 10
altered foods..............................
[[Page 36084]]
Lateral excursion range of motion:
0 to 4 mm................................... 10
Note (1): Ratings for limited interincisal movement
shall not be combined with ratings for limited lateral
excursion..............................................
Note (2): For VA compensation purposes, the normal
maximum unassisted range of vertical jaw opening is
from 35 to 50 mm.......................................
Note (3): For VA compensation purposes, mechanically
altered foods are defined as altered by blending,
chopping, grinding or mashing so that they are easy to
chew and swallow. There are four levels of mechanically
altered foods: full liquid, puree, soft, and semisolid
foods. To warrant elevation based on mechanically
altered foods, the use of texture-modified diets must
be recorded or verified by a physician.................
* * * * * * *
9911 Hard palate, loss of:
Loss of half or more, not replaceable by 30
prosthesis.................................
Loss of less than half, not replaceable by 20
prosthesis.................................
Loss of half or more, replaceable by 10
prosthesis.................................
Loss of less than half, replaceable by 0
prosthesis.................................
* * * * * * *
9916 Maxilla, malunion or nonunion of:
Nonunion,
With false motion............................... 30
Without false motion............................ 10
Malunion,
With displacement, causing severe anterior or 30
posterior open bite............................
With displacement, causing moderate anterior or 10
posterior open bite............................
With displacement, causing mild anterior or 0
posterior open bite............................
Note: For VA compensation purposes, the severity of
maxillary nonunion is dependent upon the degree of
abnormal mobility of maxilla fragments following
treatment (i.e., presence or absence of false motion),
and maxillary nonunion must be confirmed by diagnostic
imaging studies........................................
9917 Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, benign:
Rate as loss of supporting structures (bone or
teeth) and/or functional impairment due to
scarring.
9918 Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, malignant.......... 100
Note: A rating of 100 percent shall continue beyond the
cessation of any surgical, radiation, antineoplastic
chemotherapy or other therapeutic procedure. Six months
after discontinuance of such treatment, the appropriate
disability rating shall be determined by mandatory VA
examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that
or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the
provisions of Sec. 3.105(e) of this chapter. If there
has been no local recurrence or metastasis, rate on
residuals such as loss of supporting structures (bone
or teeth) and/or functional impairment due to scarring.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Amend appendix A to part 4 by:
0
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 9900, 9902, and 9903;
0
b. Adding, in numerical order, an entry for diagnostic code 9904;
0
c. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 9905;
0
d. Adding, in numerical order, entries for diagnostic codes 9906, 9907,
9911, and 9912;
0
e. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 9916; and
0
f. Adding, in numerical order, entries for diagnostic codes 9917 and
9918.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 4--Table of Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
Sec. Code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
9900 Criterion September 22,
1978; criterion February
17, 1994; title September
10, 2017.
* * * * * * *
9902 Criterion February 17, 1994;
evaluation September 10,
2017; title September 10,
2017.
9903 Criterion February 17, 1994;
evaluation September 10,
2017; title September 10,
2017.
9904 Criterion September 10,
2017.
9905 Criterion September 22,
1978; evaluation February
17, 1994; evaluation
September 10, 2017; title
September 10, 2017.
9906 Removed September 10, 2017.
9907 Removed September 10, 2017.
* * * * * * *
9911 Criterion and title
September 10, 2017.
9912 Removed September 10, 2017.
* * * * * * *
9916 Added February 17, 1994;
criterion September 10,
2017.
9917 Added September 10, 2017.
9918 Added September 10, 2017.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 36085]]
0
4. Amend appendix B to part 4 by:
0
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 9900, 9902, 9903, and
9905;
0
b. Removing the entries for diagnostic codes 9906 and 9907;
0
c. Revising the entry for diagnostic code 9911;
0
d. Removing the entry for diagnostic code 9912; and
0
e. Adding, in numerical order, entries for diagnostic codes 9917 and
9918.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 4--Numerical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic Code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dental and Oral Conditions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9900......................... Maxilla or mandible, chronic
osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, or
osteoradionecrosis of.
* * * * * * *
9902......................... Mandible loss of, including ramus,
unilaterally or bilaterally.
9903......................... Mandible, nonunion of, confirmed by
diagnostic imaging studies.
* * * * * * *
9905......................... Temporomandibular disorder (TMD).
* * * * * * *
9911......................... Hard palate, loss of.
* * * * * * *
9917......................... Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue, benign.
9918......................... Neoplasm, hard and soft tissue,
malignant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5. Amend appendix C to part 4 as follows:
0
a. Under the entry for ``Limitation of motion,'' remove the entry for
``Temporomandibular articulation'' and add in its place an entry for
``Temporomandibular'';
0
b. Under the entry for ``Loss of,'' add in alphabetical order an entry
for ``Palate, hard'';
0
c. Revise the entry for ``Mandible'';
0
d. Add in alphabetical order an entry for ``Maxilla or mandible,
chronic osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, or osteoradionecrosis of'';
0
e. Remove the entries for ``Palate, hard'' and ``Ramus'' located below
the entry for ``Nose, part of, or scars'' and above the entry for
``Skull, part of'';
0
f. Under the entry for ``Neoplasms,'' under both ``Benign'' and
``Malignant,'' add in alphabetical order an entry for ``Hard and soft
tissue'';
0
g. Under the entry for ``Nonunion,'' remove the entry for ``Mandible''
and add in its place an entry for ``Mandible, confirmed by diagnostic
imaging studies'';
0
h. Remove the entry for ``Osteomyelitis maxilla or mandible''.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 4--Alphabetical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
Code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Limitation of motion:
* * * * * * *
Temporomandibular................................... 9905
* * * * * * *
Loss of:
* * * * * * *
Palate, hard........................................ 9911
* * * *.................................................
Mandible:
Including ramus, unilaterally or bilaterally........ 9902
* * * * * * *
Maxilla or mandible, chronic osteomyelitis, 9900
osteonecrosis, or osteoradionecrosis of............
* * * * * * *
Neoplasms:
Benign:
* * * * * * *
Hard and soft tissue............................ 9917
[[Page 36086]]
* * * * * * *
Malignant:
* * * * * * *
Hard and soft tissue............................ 9918
* * * * * * *
Nonunion:
Mandible, confirmed by diagnostic imaging studies... 9903
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-16132 Filed 8-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P