Safety Zone, Blue Angels Air Show; St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL, 35717-35719 [2017-16177]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile
radius of Gregory M. Simmons
Memorial Airport, Cisco, TX, due to the
establishment of a new public
instrument approach procedure at the
airport. Controlled airspace is necessary
for the safety and management of
instrument approach procedures for IFR
operations at the airport.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016,
and effective September 15, 2016, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward from 700 feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Cisco, TX [New]
Gregory M. Simmons Airport, TX
(Lat. 32°21′57″ N., long. 99°01′25″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile
radius of Gregory M. Simmons Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 24,
2017.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2017–16090 Filed 7–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0577]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Blue Angels Air Show; St.
Johns River, Jacksonville, FL
Environmental Review
AGENCY:
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
ACTION:
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Jul 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on the waters of
the St. Johns River in vicinity of Naval
Air Station (NAS) Jacksonville, Florida
during the Blue Angels Air Show. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville
or a designated representative. The
Coast Guard invites your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 31, 2017.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35717
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0577 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville, Chief,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
guard; telephone (904) 714–7616, email
Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 25, 2017, NAS Jacksonville
submitted a marine event application to
the Coast Guard for the Blue Angels Air
Show that will take place from
November 3, 2017 through November 5,
2017. The air show will consist of
various flight demonstrations over the
St. Johns River in vicinity of NAS
Jacksonville. Over the years, there have
been unfortunate instances of aircraft
mishaps that involve crashing during
performances at various air shows
around the world. Occasionally, these
incidents result in a wide area of
scattered debris in the water that can
damage property or cause significant
injury or death to the public observing
the air shows. The Captain of the Port
(COTP) Jacksonville has determined that
a safety zone is necessary to protect the
general public from hazards associated
with aerial flight demonstrations.
The purpose of the rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and persons
during the air show on the navigable
waters of the St. Johns River in vicinity
of NAS Jacksonville, Florida. The Coast
Guard proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
from November 3, 2017 through
November 5, 2017. The safety zone will
encompass all waters within an area
approximately three quarters of a mile
parallel to the shoreline, and one mile
out into the St. Johns River in
Jacksonville, FL. The duration of the
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
35718
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
zone is intended to ensure the safety of
the public and these navigable waters
during the aerial flight demonstrations.
No vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the St. Johns River for nine hours on
each of the three days the air show is
occurring. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone, and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Jul 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone that would
prohibit persons and vessels from
transiting through a one square mile
regulated area during a three day air
show lasting nine hours daily. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165. T07–0577 to read as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T07–0577 Safety Zone, Blue Angels
Air Show; St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone located on the St. Johns
River in Jacksonville, FL. All waters of
the St. Johns River encompassed within
an imaginary line connecting the
following points: Starting at Point 1 in
position 30°13′41″ N.; 081°39′45″ W.,
thence due east to Point 2 in position
30°13″41″ N.; 081°38′35″ W., thence
south to Point 3 in position 30°14′27″
N.; 081°38″35″ W., thence west to Point
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Jul 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
4 in position 30°14′27″ N., 081°39′45″
W., thence following the shoreline north
back to the point of origin. These
coordinates are based on North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
Jacksonville by telephone at (904) 714–
7557, or a designated representative via
VHF–FM radio on channel 16, to
request authorization. If authorization is
granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area through
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM channel 16 or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will
be enforced daily from 8 a.m. until 5
p.m. from November 3, 2017 through
November 5, 2017.
Dated: July 27, 2017.
T.C. Wiemers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2017–16177 Filed 7–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900–AP88
Schedule for Rating Disabilities;
Musculoskeletal System and Muscle
Injuries
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to revise the
regulations that involve the
Musculoskeletal System within the VA
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35719
Schedule for Rating Disabilities
(‘‘VASRD’’ or ‘‘Rating Schedule’’). VA
proposes to rename certain diagnostic
codes, revise rating criteria, give new
rating guidance, add new codes, and
remove obsolete codes. These revisions
would incorporate medical terminology
more recent than the last comprehensive
review, as well as simplify the rating
process.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before October 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (00REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AP88—Schedule for Rating Disabilities;
Musculoskeletal System and Muscle
Injuries.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Reynolds, M.D., Regulations Staff
(211C), Compensation Service, Veterans
Benefits Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–
9700. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Defense Authorization Act of
2004, secs. 1501–07, Public Law 108–
136, 117 Stat. 1392, established the
Veterans’ Disability Benefits
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’).
Section 1502 of Public Law 108–136
mandated the Commission to study
ways to improve the disability
compensation system for military
veterans. The Commission consulted
with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to
review the medical aspects of current
compensation policies. In 2007, the IOM
released its report titled ‘‘A 21st Century
System for Evaluating Veterans for
Disability Benefits.’’ (Michael McGeary
et al. eds.2007).
The IOM report was notable in several
respects. The IOM observed that, in
part, the Rating Schedule was
inadequate in areas because it contained
obsolete information and did not
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 1, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35717-35719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16177]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0577]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Blue Angels Air Show; St. Johns River, Jacksonville,
FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the
waters of the St. Johns River in vicinity of Naval Air Station (NAS)
Jacksonville, Florida during the Blue Angels Air Show. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville
or a designated representative. The Coast Guard invites your comments
on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0577 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Sector
Jacksonville, Chief, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast guard; telephone
(904) 714-7616, email Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On April 25, 2017, NAS Jacksonville submitted a marine event
application to the Coast Guard for the Blue Angels Air Show that will
take place from November 3, 2017 through November 5, 2017. The air show
will consist of various flight demonstrations over the St. Johns River
in vicinity of NAS Jacksonville. Over the years, there have been
unfortunate instances of aircraft mishaps that involve crashing during
performances at various air shows around the world. Occasionally, these
incidents result in a wide area of scattered debris in the water that
can damage property or cause significant injury or death to the public
observing the air shows. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville
has determined that a safety zone is necessary to protect the general
public from hazards associated with aerial flight demonstrations.
The purpose of the rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and persons during the air show on the navigable waters of the St.
Johns River in vicinity of NAS Jacksonville, Florida. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. from November 3, 2017 through November 5, 2017. The safety zone
will encompass all waters within an area approximately three quarters
of a mile parallel to the shoreline, and one mile out into the St.
Johns River in Jacksonville, FL. The duration of the
[[Page 35718]]
zone is intended to ensure the safety of the public and these navigable
waters during the aerial flight demonstrations. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the St. Johns River for nine hours on
each of the three days the air show is occurring. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone that would prohibit persons and vessels from transiting through a
one square mile regulated area during a three day air show lasting nine
hours daily. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the
[[Page 35719]]
outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165. T07-0577 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0577 Safety Zone, Blue Angels Air Show; St. Johns River,
Jacksonville, FL
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone located on
the St. Johns River in Jacksonville, FL. All waters of the St. Johns
River encompassed within an imaginary line connecting the following
points: Starting at Point 1 in position 30[deg]13'41'' N.;
081[deg]39'45'' W., thence due east to Point 2 in position
30[deg]13''41'' N.; 081[deg]38'35'' W., thence south to Point 3 in
position 30[deg]14'27'' N.; 081[deg]38''35'' W., thence west to Point 4
in position 30[deg]14'27'' N., 081[deg]39'45'' W., thence following the
shoreline north back to the point of origin. These coordinates are
based on North American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the enforcement of the regulated
area.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Jacksonville or a designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Jacksonville by telephone at (904) 714-7557, or a designated
representative via VHF-FM radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization is granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the
COTP Jacksonville or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM channel 16 or by on-
scene designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced daily from 8
a.m. until 5 p.m. from November 3, 2017 through November 5, 2017.
Dated: July 27, 2017.
T.C. Wiemers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2017-16177 Filed 7-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P