Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Amendment to Regulations Implementing the Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan; Change to Pacific Mackerel Management Cycle From Annual to Biennial, 35687-35688 [2017-16135]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
will exceed its trimester or annual quota
of GB cod to the detriment of this stock,
which could undermine management
objectives of the Northeast Multispecies
Fishery Management Plan. Additionally,
an overage of the trimester or annual
common pool quota could cause
negative economic impacts to the
common pool fishery as a result of
overage paybacks deducted from a
future trimester or fishing year.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: July 27, 2017.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–16176 Filed 7–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 160614521–7624–02]
RIN 0648–BF96
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Amendment to Regulations
Implementing the Coastal Pelagic
Species Fishery Management Plan;
Change to Pacific Mackerel
Management Cycle From Annual to
Biennial
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coastal Pelagic Species
(CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
states that each year the Secretary will
publish in the Federal Register the final
specifications for all stocks in the
actively managed stock category, which
includes Pacific mackerel. NMFS is
changing the management framework
for Pacific mackerel so specifications
will be set biennially instead of on an
annual basis. The purpose of this
change is to reduce the costs, while
providing frequent enough reevaluation
and adjustment in the specifications to
manage and conserve Pacific mackerel.
DATES: Effective August 31, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034,
Joshua.Lindsay@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the Pacific mackerel fishery in
the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
off the Pacific coast (California, Oregon,
and Washington) in accordance with the
CPS FMP. The CPS FMP states that each
year the Secretary will publish in the
Federal Register the specifications for
all stocks in the actively managed stock
category, which includes Pacific
mackerel. In 2013, the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
recommended that the harvest
specification process for Pacific
mackerel move from a 1-year
management cycle to a 2-year
management cycle beginning in 2015.
The Council recommended this revision
to the management cycle under the CPS
FMP’s framework mechanism, which
allows such changes by rulemaking
without formally amending the fishery
management plan itself. NMFS
published separate annual
specifications for Pacific mackerel for
the 2015–16 and the 2016–17 fishing
seasons to keep pace with the schedule
of the fishery, and is now changing the
annual notice requirement under the
framework mechanism of the CPS FMP.
From now on, NMFS will implement 2
years of harvest specifications with one
rulemaking, beginning with the 2017
fishing season.
The CPS FMP and its implementing
regulations require NMFS to set annual
catch levels for the Pacific mackerel
fishery based on the annual
specification framework and control
rules in the CPS FMP. These control
rules include the harvest guideline
control rule, which in conjunction with
the overfishing limit (OFL), acceptable
biological catch (ABC) and annual catch
limit (ACL) rules in the CPS FMP are
used to manage harvest levels for Pacific
mackerel, in accordance with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Annual estimates of
biomass are an explicit part of these
various harvest control rules, therefore,
annual stock assessments are currently
conducted for Pacific mackerel to
provide annual estimates of biomass.
Then, during public meetings each year,
the estimated biomass for Pacific
mackerel from these assessments is
presented to the Council’s CPS
Management Team (Team), the
Council’s CPS Advisory Subpanel
(Subpanel) and the Council’s Scientific
and Statistical Committee (SSC), and the
biomass and the status of the fishery are
reviewed and discussed. The biomass
estimate is then presented to the
Council along with recommendations
and comments from the Team, Subpanel
and SSC. Following review by the
Council and after hearing public
comment, the Council adopts a biomass
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35687
estimate and makes its catch level
recommendations to NMFS. Based on
these recommendations, NMFS
implements these catch specifications
for each fishing year and publishes the
specifications annually. Over recent
years, little new information has been
available for informing Pacific mackerel
stock assessments from one year to the
next. Therefore, stock assessment
scientists at the Southwest Fisheries
Science Center (SWFSC), along with the
SSC, concluded that conducting stock
assessments annually is not necessary to
manage Pacific mackerel sustainably;
conducting assessments every 2 years
can provide the necessary scientific
information to continue to manage the
stock sustainably. Annual landings of
Pacific mackerel have also remained at
historically low levels with landings
averaging 5,000 mt over the last 10
years, well below the annual quotas
over this time period. This highlights
that the biomass of this stock is not
being greatly impacted by fishing
pressure. Low landings since 2011 are
also one of the limitations of the recent
stock assessments because they result in
limited fishery-dependent sample
information for use in the stock
assessment. Based on this information,
and in light of the monetary and
personnel costs associated with
conducting and reviewing each stock
assessment as well as adopting
specifications each year, the Council
established a new Pacific mackerel
management and assessment schedule
under which full stock assessments
would be conducted every 4 years, and
in the second year of each cycle, the
assessment will be updated using catchonly projection estimates. Each of these
assessments would provide the biomass
estimate for the current year as well as
a projection of what the biomass will be
in the following year. Those biomass
estimates would then be used in the
harvest control rules for Pacific
mackerel, which the Council would use
to provide NMFS with
recommendations for the OFL, ABC and
ACL for the following 2 years.
This final rule changes the review and
implementation schedule for setting
Pacific mackerel harvest specifications,
allowing NMFS to implement 2 years of
catch specifications with a single notice
and comment rulemaking. Reviewing
biomass estimates and implementing
catch specifications for 2 years at a time
instead of 1 allows NMFS and the
Council to use available time and
resources in a more efficient manner,
while still preserving the conservation
and management goals of the CPS FMP,
and using the best available science.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
35688
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS will set biennial specifications
from the 2017 fishing season forward in
the Code of Federal Regulations.
The proposed rule stated that this
rulemaking would change the review
and implementation schedule for Pacific
mackerel, and the stock assessment
cycle. That was an error: NMFS did not
intend to propose to change the stock
assessment cycle by rulemaking, as the
Council already acted on that change.
The action by this rule is only to allow
the agency to implement 2 separate
years of harvest specifications through a
single notice and comment rulemaking
process.
On January 4, 2017, a proposed rule
was published for this action and public
comments solicited (82 FR 812) with a
comment period that ended on February
3, 2017. NMFS received three comments
regarding the amendment to change
Pacific mackerel specifications to be set
biennially instead of on an annual basis.
No changes were made in response to
the comments received. NMFS
summarizes and responds to those
comments below.
Comments and Responses
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Comment 1: Two of the comments
voiced a similar concern that, in moving
from an annual stock assessment
process to a biennial process, the
harvest specifications would not be
based on the best possible information.
One commenter stated that keeping the
current system of setting management
specifications every year would provide
better information to manage Pacific
mackerel and allow the agency to be
better positioned if more rapid
adjustments are needed to either protect
against overfishing, while the second
commenter was concerned that if the
stock greatly increased during one of the
interim assessment years, that the
industry might endure a missed
opportunity.
Response: As described above, based
on recommendations from its SSC and
scientists from the SWFSC, the Council
has determined that as a matter of
practice doing new stock assessments
every year for Pacific mackerel was not
providing significantly better
information with which to manage the
stock and prevent overfishing compared
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
to the proposed approach. Based on this
determination, the Council established a
Pacific mackerel management and
assessment schedule under which full
stock assessments will be conducted
every 4 years, and in the second year of
each cycle the assessment will be
updated using catch-only projection
estimates. Each of these assessments
would provide the biomass estimate for
the current year as well as a projection
of what the biomass will be in the
following year. Those biomass estimates
would then be used in the harvest
control rules for Pacific mackerel and
the Council provides NMFS with
recommendations for the OFL, ABC and
ACL for the following 2 years. The
action being taken by NMFS through
this rule is to allow the agency to
implement those 2 separate years of
harvest specifications through a single
notice and comment rulemaking
process. Additionally, this action does
not change the control rules used to set
the annual catch limits, including the
ABC control rule under which scientific
uncertainty in the OFL is considered in
estimating ABC at a level that is
intended to buffer against overfishing.
Comment 2: The California
Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW) submitted a comment
expressing general support for the
proposed rule and streamlining the
process for setting specifications for
Pacific mackerel.
Response: CDFW is an important comanager of CPS and NMFS appreciates
its input. NMFS agrees with the CDFW
that annual stock assessments are not
necessary to manage Pacific mackerel
sustainability. NMFS is supportive of
the expanded efforts by CDFW to collect
baseline biological and fishery data
through their dockside sampling
program to help inform ongoing and
future assessment efforts of the various
CPS stocks.
Classification
The Administrator, West Coast
Region, NMFS, determined that the
FMP Amendment to Regulations
Implementing the CPS FMP; Change to
Pacific Mackerel Management Cycle
from Annual to Biennial is necessary for
the conservation and management of the
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Pacific mackerel fishery and that it is
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification. As a result, a
regulatory flexibility analysis was not
required and none was prepared.
This action does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 26, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS is amending 50 CFR
part 660 as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. In § 660.508, add paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
■
§ 660.508
Annual specifications.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Pacific mackerel. Every 2 years the
Regional Administrator will determine,
and publish in the Federal Register,
harvest specifications for 2 consecutive
fishing seasons for Pacific mackerel.
[FR Doc. 2017–16135 Filed 7–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35687-35688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16135]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 160614521-7624-02]
RIN 0648-BF96
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Amendment to Regulations Implementing the Coastal Pelagic
Species Fishery Management Plan; Change to Pacific Mackerel Management
Cycle From Annual to Biennial
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) states that each year the Secretary will publish in the Federal
Register the final specifications for all stocks in the actively
managed stock category, which includes Pacific mackerel. NMFS is
changing the management framework for Pacific mackerel so
specifications will be set biennially instead of on an annual basis.
The purpose of this change is to reduce the costs, while providing
frequent enough reevaluation and adjustment in the specifications to
manage and conserve Pacific mackerel.
DATES: Effective August 31, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Lindsay, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 980-4034, Joshua.Lindsay@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the Pacific mackerel fishery in
the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the Pacific coast
(California, Oregon, and Washington) in accordance with the CPS FMP.
The CPS FMP states that each year the Secretary will publish in the
Federal Register the specifications for all stocks in the actively
managed stock category, which includes Pacific mackerel. In 2013, the
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) recommended that the
harvest specification process for Pacific mackerel move from a 1-year
management cycle to a 2-year management cycle beginning in 2015. The
Council recommended this revision to the management cycle under the CPS
FMP's framework mechanism, which allows such changes by rulemaking
without formally amending the fishery management plan itself. NMFS
published separate annual specifications for Pacific mackerel for the
2015-16 and the 2016-17 fishing seasons to keep pace with the schedule
of the fishery, and is now changing the annual notice requirement under
the framework mechanism of the CPS FMP. From now on, NMFS will
implement 2 years of harvest specifications with one rulemaking,
beginning with the 2017 fishing season.
The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS to set
annual catch levels for the Pacific mackerel fishery based on the
annual specification framework and control rules in the CPS FMP. These
control rules include the harvest guideline control rule, which in
conjunction with the overfishing limit (OFL), acceptable biological
catch (ABC) and annual catch limit (ACL) rules in the CPS FMP are used
to manage harvest levels for Pacific mackerel, in accordance with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq. Annual estimates of biomass are an explicit part of these
various harvest control rules, therefore, annual stock assessments are
currently conducted for Pacific mackerel to provide annual estimates of
biomass. Then, during public meetings each year, the estimated biomass
for Pacific mackerel from these assessments is presented to the
Council's CPS Management Team (Team), the Council's CPS Advisory
Subpanel (Subpanel) and the Council's Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC), and the biomass and the status of the fishery are
reviewed and discussed. The biomass estimate is then presented to the
Council along with recommendations and comments from the Team, Subpanel
and SSC. Following review by the Council and after hearing public
comment, the Council adopts a biomass estimate and makes its catch
level recommendations to NMFS. Based on these recommendations, NMFS
implements these catch specifications for each fishing year and
publishes the specifications annually. Over recent years, little new
information has been available for informing Pacific mackerel stock
assessments from one year to the next. Therefore, stock assessment
scientists at the Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC), along
with the SSC, concluded that conducting stock assessments annually is
not necessary to manage Pacific mackerel sustainably; conducting
assessments every 2 years can provide the necessary scientific
information to continue to manage the stock sustainably. Annual
landings of Pacific mackerel have also remained at historically low
levels with landings averaging 5,000 mt over the last 10 years, well
below the annual quotas over this time period. This highlights that the
biomass of this stock is not being greatly impacted by fishing
pressure. Low landings since 2011 are also one of the limitations of
the recent stock assessments because they result in limited fishery-
dependent sample information for use in the stock assessment. Based on
this information, and in light of the monetary and personnel costs
associated with conducting and reviewing each stock assessment as well
as adopting specifications each year, the Council established a new
Pacific mackerel management and assessment schedule under which full
stock assessments would be conducted every 4 years, and in the second
year of each cycle, the assessment will be updated using catch-only
projection estimates. Each of these assessments would provide the
biomass estimate for the current year as well as a projection of what
the biomass will be in the following year. Those biomass estimates
would then be used in the harvest control rules for Pacific mackerel,
which the Council would use to provide NMFS with recommendations for
the OFL, ABC and ACL for the following 2 years.
This final rule changes the review and implementation schedule for
setting Pacific mackerel harvest specifications, allowing NMFS to
implement 2 years of catch specifications with a single notice and
comment rulemaking. Reviewing biomass estimates and implementing catch
specifications for 2 years at a time instead of 1 allows NMFS and the
Council to use available time and resources in a more efficient manner,
while still preserving the conservation and management goals of the CPS
FMP, and using the best available science.
[[Page 35688]]
NMFS will set biennial specifications from the 2017 fishing season
forward in the Code of Federal Regulations.
The proposed rule stated that this rulemaking would change the
review and implementation schedule for Pacific mackerel, and the stock
assessment cycle. That was an error: NMFS did not intend to propose to
change the stock assessment cycle by rulemaking, as the Council already
acted on that change. The action by this rule is only to allow the
agency to implement 2 separate years of harvest specifications through
a single notice and comment rulemaking process.
On January 4, 2017, a proposed rule was published for this action
and public comments solicited (82 FR 812) with a comment period that
ended on February 3, 2017. NMFS received three comments regarding the
amendment to change Pacific mackerel specifications to be set
biennially instead of on an annual basis. No changes were made in
response to the comments received. NMFS summarizes and responds to
those comments below.
Comments and Responses
Comment 1: Two of the comments voiced a similar concern that, in
moving from an annual stock assessment process to a biennial process,
the harvest specifications would not be based on the best possible
information. One commenter stated that keeping the current system of
setting management specifications every year would provide better
information to manage Pacific mackerel and allow the agency to be
better positioned if more rapid adjustments are needed to either
protect against overfishing, while the second commenter was concerned
that if the stock greatly increased during one of the interim
assessment years, that the industry might endure a missed opportunity.
Response: As described above, based on recommendations from its SSC
and scientists from the SWFSC, the Council has determined that as a
matter of practice doing new stock assessments every year for Pacific
mackerel was not providing significantly better information with which
to manage the stock and prevent overfishing compared to the proposed
approach. Based on this determination, the Council established a
Pacific mackerel management and assessment schedule under which full
stock assessments will be conducted every 4 years, and in the second
year of each cycle the assessment will be updated using catch-only
projection estimates. Each of these assessments would provide the
biomass estimate for the current year as well as a projection of what
the biomass will be in the following year. Those biomass estimates
would then be used in the harvest control rules for Pacific mackerel
and the Council provides NMFS with recommendations for the OFL, ABC and
ACL for the following 2 years. The action being taken by NMFS through
this rule is to allow the agency to implement those 2 separate years of
harvest specifications through a single notice and comment rulemaking
process. Additionally, this action does not change the control rules
used to set the annual catch limits, including the ABC control rule
under which scientific uncertainty in the OFL is considered in
estimating ABC at a level that is intended to buffer against
overfishing.
Comment 2: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
submitted a comment expressing general support for the proposed rule
and streamlining the process for setting specifications for Pacific
mackerel.
Response: CDFW is an important co-manager of CPS and NMFS
appreciates its input. NMFS agrees with the CDFW that annual stock
assessments are not necessary to manage Pacific mackerel
sustainability. NMFS is supportive of the expanded efforts by CDFW to
collect baseline biological and fishery data through their dockside
sampling program to help inform ongoing and future assessment efforts
of the various CPS stocks.
Classification
The Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, determined that the FMP
Amendment to Regulations Implementing the CPS FMP; Change to Pacific
Mackerel Management Cycle from Annual to Biennial is necessary for the
conservation and management of the Pacific mackerel fishery and that it
is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received
regarding this certification. As a result, a regulatory flexibility
analysis was not required and none was prepared.
This action does not contain a collection-of-information
requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 26, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS is amending 50 CFR
part 660 as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.508, add paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.508 Annual specifications.
* * * * *
(e) Pacific mackerel. Every 2 years the Regional Administrator will
determine, and publish in the Federal Register, harvest specifications
for 2 consecutive fishing seasons for Pacific mackerel.
[FR Doc. 2017-16135 Filed 7-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P