Security Zone; Los Angeles Fleet Week, San Pedro, California, 35136-35138 [2017-15946]
Download as PDF
35136
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
LLNR Light List Number
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
procedural, enforceable at law by a
party against the United States.
Dated: June 27, 2017.
Thomas G. Hohenthaner,
Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary (Acting), Millennium
Challenge Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2017–13922 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9211–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0645]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Los Angeles Fleet
Week, San Pedro, California
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Coast Guard
proposes establishing a security zone in
the Port of Los Angeles Main Channel,
in support of Los Angeles Fleet Week.
This action is necessary to protect the
area surrounding the LA World Cruise
Center and the high concentration of
people attending the event. This
proposed rulemaking is necessary to
prohibit vessels from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining within
the designated area unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Los Angeles-Long Beach, or her
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0645 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email BMC James
Morgia, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles-Long
Beach; telephone (310) 521–3860, email
James.M.Morgia@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
Captain of the Port or her designated
representative. General boating public
would be notified prior to the
enforcement of the security zone via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Port of Los Angeles and the City
of Los Angeles Fleet Week Committee
has notified the Coast Guard that it will
be conducting an annual LA Fleet Week
event at the LA World Cruise Center,
Berth 90–93, annually for a period of
seven days around the Labor Day
holiday weekend. The event at the LA
World Cruise Center is expected to
generate over 250,000 people in
attendance each year. Hazards
associated with event security may arise
due to the expected high concentration
of people in attendance for the event,
including potential visits from
dignitaries and VIP participants, within
the main shipping channel of the
nation’s most economically vital port
complex. There is increased awareness
regarding recent national and
worldwide events that have
demonstrated direct threats to the
security of large crowds in attendance
for various high profile events. The
Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long
Beach has determined that potential
hazards associated with the number of
people expected to be in attendance on
the vessels and pier within LA Harbor
are a significant concern for public
security.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of, and reduce the risk
to, the persons in attendance for LA
Fleet Week. The Coast Guard proposes
this rulemaking under the authority of
33 U.S.C. 1231.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
security zone for 7 days during the
Labor Day holiday weekend in August
and September during the Fleet Week.
The security zone would encompass all
navigable waters from the surface to the
sea floor consisting of a line connecting
the following coordinates: 33°44.967′
N., 118°16.664′ W.; 33°44.874′ N.,
118°16.362′ W.; 33°44.662′ N.,
118°16.454′ W.; 33°44.370′ N.,
118°16.580′ W.; and 33°44.386′ N.,
118°16.696′ W. All coordinates
displayed are referenced by North
American Datum of 1983, World
Geodetic System, 1984. During the
enforcement period, vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or remaining within the
designated area unless authorized by the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the security zone.
Commercial vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit through this security zone,
which will impact a designated area of
the LA main channel in the vicinity of
the World Cruise Center Berth 90–93.
The Coast Guard and Inter Agency
Unified Command will establish
communications with the LA Pilots and
Vessel Traffic Service/Marine Exchange
to coordinate and mitigate all inbound
and outbound commercial traffic
movements through the security zone.
Recreational traffic will be able to
transit around this security zone, which
extends 200 yds into the LA main
channel leaving 150 to 200 yds of transit
area for small vessel traffic to pass
around the security zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator. If you think that your
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a security zone encompassing
an area around the Los Angeles Fleet
Week events. Such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35137
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1189 to read as follows:
§ 165.1189 Security Zone; Los Angeles
Fleet Week, San Pedro, California.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All navigable waters from
the surface to the sea floor consisting of
a line connecting the following
coordinates: 33°44.967′ N., 118°16.664′
W.; 33°44.874′ N., 118°16.362′ W.;
33°44.662′ N., 118°16.454′ W.;
33°44.370′ N., 118°16.580′ W.; and
33°44.386′ N., 118°16.696′ W. All
coordinates displayed are referenced by
North American Datum of 1983, World
Geodetic System, 1984.
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
35138
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(b) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section:
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Los AngelesLong Beach(COTP) in the enforcement
of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, hail
Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles-Long
Beach on VHF–FM Channel 16 or call
at (310) 521–3801. Those in the security
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. The security
zone will be enforced annually for a
period of seven days around the Labor
Day holiday weekend in August and
September. During the enforcement
period, vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
remaining within the designated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or her designated representative.
The Coast Guard will publish a local
notice to mariners providing exact dates
and times at least 20 days prior to the
enforcement of the security zone via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: July 21, 2017.
Monica L. Rochester,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port, Los Angeles—Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2017–15946 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0414]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Huntington Beach
Airshow, Huntington Beach, California
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The U.S. Coast Guard
proposes establishing a safety zone
offshore of Huntington Beach, CA, in
support of the Huntington Beach
Airshow. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email BMC James
Morgia, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles-Long
Beach; telephone (310) 521–3860, email
James.M.Morgia@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
LLNR Light List Number
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
AGENCY:
navigable waters in the area of the
aerobatic zone during the performance.
This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from
entering into, transiting through, or
remaining within the designated area
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Los Angeles-Long
Beach, or her designated representative.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0414 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
The City of Huntington Beach and Air
Support LLC notified the Coast Guard
that it will be conducting an annual
four-day Air Show in the vicinity of the
Huntington Beach Pier in September
and October. Hazards associated with
navigation safety may arise due to
multiple low flying aircrafts flight paths
and stunt performances over the waters
off Huntington Beach. The Captain of
the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the Air Show
performance would be a safety concern
for anyone in the vicinity of the Air
Show aerobatic performance area.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of persons or vessels
that operate on and in the vicinity of the
aerobatic performance. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under the
authority of 33 U.S.C. 1231.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone that would be enforced for
a period of four days in September and
October each year. The safety zone
would encompass all navigable waters
from the surface to the sea floor
consisting of a line connecting the
following coordinates: 33°38.378′ N.,
117°58.833′ W.; 33°37.972′ N.,
117°59.200′ W.; 33°39.177′ N.,
118°01.121′ W.; and 33°39.583′ N.,
118°00.753′ W.. All coordinates
displayed are referenced by North
American Datum of 1983, World
Geodetic System, 1984. During the
enforcement period, vessels would be
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or remaining within the
designated area unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or her designated
representative. General boating public
would be notified prior to the
enforcement of the safety zone via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771,
directs agencies to control regulatory
costs through a budgeting process.’’ This
NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance,
it is exempt from the requirements of
E.O. 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. Vessel
traffic would be able to safely transit
around this safety zone, which would
impact a small designated area of the
Huntington Beach shoreline in the
vicinity of the Huntington Beach Pier.
The size of the zone is the minimum
necessary to provide adequate
protection for the waterways users,
adjoining areas, and the public. Any
hardships experienced by persons or
vessels are considered minimal
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35136-35138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15946]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0645]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Los Angeles Fleet Week, San Pedro, California
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard proposes establishing a security zone in
the Port of Los Angeles Main Channel, in support of Los Angeles Fleet
Week. This action is necessary to protect the area surrounding the LA
World Cruise Center and the high concentration of people attending the
event. This proposed rulemaking is necessary to prohibit vessels from
entering into, transiting through, or remaining within the designated
area unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Los
Angeles-Long Beach, or her designated representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0645 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email BMC James Morgia, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles-Long Beach; telephone
(310) 521-3860, email James.M.Morgia@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
LLNR Light List Number
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The Port of Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles Fleet Week
Committee has notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting an
annual LA Fleet Week event at the LA World Cruise Center, Berth 90-93,
annually for a period of seven days around the Labor Day holiday
weekend. The event at the LA World Cruise Center is expected to
generate over 250,000 people in attendance each year. Hazards
associated with event security may arise due to the expected high
concentration of people in attendance for the event, including
potential visits from dignitaries and VIP participants, within the main
shipping channel of the nation's most economically vital port complex.
There is increased awareness regarding recent national and worldwide
events that have demonstrated direct threats to the security of large
crowds in attendance for various high profile events. The Captain of
the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach has determined that potential hazards
associated with the number of people expected to be in attendance on
the vessels and pier within LA Harbor are a significant concern for
public security.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of, and
reduce the risk to, the persons in attendance for LA Fleet Week. The
Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under the authority of 33 U.S.C.
1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a security zone for 7 days during
the Labor Day holiday weekend in August and September during the Fleet
Week. The security zone would encompass all navigable waters from the
surface to the sea floor consisting of a line connecting the following
coordinates: 33[deg]44.967' N., 118[deg]16.664' W.; 33[deg]44.874' N.,
118[deg]16.362' W.; 33[deg]44.662' N., 118[deg]16.454' W.;
33[deg]44.370' N., 118[deg]16.580' W.; and 33[deg]44.386' N.,
118[deg]16.696' W. All coordinates displayed are referenced by North
American Datum of 1983, World Geodetic System, 1984. During the
enforcement period, vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining within the designated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or her designated representative.
General boating public would be notified prior to the enforcement of
the security zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The regulatory text
we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the security zone. Commercial vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit through this security zone, which will
impact a designated area of the LA main channel in the vicinity of the
World Cruise Center Berth 90-93. The Coast Guard and Inter Agency
Unified Command will establish communications with the LA Pilots and
Vessel Traffic Service/Marine Exchange to coordinate and mitigate all
inbound and outbound commercial traffic movements through the security
zone. Recreational traffic will be able to transit around this security
zone, which extends 200 yds into the LA main channel leaving 150 to 200
yds of transit area for small vessel traffic to pass around the
security zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
[[Page 35137]]
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule involves a security zone encompassing
an area around the Los Angeles Fleet Week events. Such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1189 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1189 Security Zone; Los Angeles Fleet Week, San Pedro,
California.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable
waters from the surface to the sea floor consisting of a line
connecting the following coordinates: 33[deg]44.967' N.,
118[deg]16.664' W.; 33[deg]44.874' N., 118[deg]16.362' W.;
33[deg]44.662' N., 118[deg]16.454' W.; 33[deg]44.370' N.,
118[deg]16.580' W.; and 33[deg]44.386' N., 118[deg]16.696' W. All
coordinates displayed are referenced by North American Datum of 1983,
World Geodetic System, 1984.
[[Page 35138]]
(b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section:
Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long
Beach(COTP) in the enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, hail Coast Guard Sector Los
Angeles-Long Beach on VHF-FM Channel 16 or call at (310) 521-3801.
Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. The security zone will be enforced annually
for a period of seven days around the Labor Day holiday weekend in
August and September. During the enforcement period, vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or remaining within
the designated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or her
designated representative. The Coast Guard will publish a local notice
to mariners providing exact dates and times at least 20 days prior to
the enforcement of the security zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: July 21, 2017.
Monica L. Rochester,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Los Angeles--
Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2017-15946 Filed 7-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P