Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The Genitourinary Diseases and Conditions, 35140-35148 [2017-15765]
Download as PDF
35140
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
2. Add § 165.1109 to read as follows:
38 CFR Part 4
§ 165.1109 Safety Zone; Huntington Beach
Airshow, Huntington Beach, California.
RIN 2900–AP16
■
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters from
the surface to the sea floor consisting of
a line connecting the following
coordinates: 33°38.378′ N., 117°58.833′
W.; 33°37.972′ N., 117°59.200′ W.;
33°39.177′ N., 118°01.121′ W.; and
33°39.583′ N., 118°00.753′ W. All
coordinates displayed are referenced by
North American Datum of 1983, World
Geodetic System, 1984.
(b) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section:
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Los AngelesLong Beach (COTP) in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone
regulations in subpart C of this part, you
may not enter the safety zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, hail
Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles-Long
Beach on VHF–FM Channel 16 or call
at (310) 521–3801. Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. The safety
zone will be enforced during airshow
demonstrations for 4 days in September
and October. The Coast Guard will
provide notice regarding specific event
dates and times, which will be
published in the local notice to mariners
at least 20 days prior to the event via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: July 21, 2017.
Monica L. Rochester,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port, Los Angeles-Long Beach.
[FR Doc. 2017–15945 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The
Genitourinary Diseases and
Conditions
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend the portion of
the Schedule for Rating Disabilities that
addresses the genitourinary system. The
purpose of this change is to update
current medical terminology,
incorporate medical advances that have
occurred since the last review, and
provide well-defined criteria in
accordance with actual, standard
medical clinical practice. The proposed
rule reflects the most up-to-date medical
knowledge and clinical practice of
nephrology and urology specialties, as
well as comments from subject matter
experts and the public garnered during
a public forum held January 27–28,
2011.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through www.Regulations.
gov; by mail or hand-delivery to
Director, Regulation Policy and
Management (00REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AP16—Schedule for Rating Disabilities;
The Genitourinary Diseases and
Conditions.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1063B,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ioulia Vvedenskaya, M.D., M.B.A.,
Medical Officer, Part 4 VASRD
Regulations Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9752.
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number.)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
As part of
the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA)
ongoing revision of the Schedule for
Rating Disabilities (VASRD), VA
proposes changes to the portion of the
VASRD that addresses the genitourinary
system, which was last revised in 1994.
See 59 FR 2523 (Jan. 18, 1994); see also
59 FR 46338 (Sep. 8, 1994). Through
this revision, VA aims to eliminate
ambiguities, include medical conditions
not currently in the rating schedule,
implement current, well-refined
medical criteria, and update
terminology to reflect the most recent
medical advances.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Proposed Changes to § 4.115
Currently, 38 CFR 4.115 (‘‘Nephritis’’)
does not adequately reflect current
concepts of renal and urinary tract
disease and conditions. Regardless of
specific disease pathology, kidney
conditions generally produce the same
symptomatology and lead to the same
functional impairment. Therefore, for
rating purposes, analysis of pathology,
such as is currently presented in the
first three sentences of § 4.115, is
unnecessary and VA proposes to remove
this language.
However, VA proposes to retain the
remainder of the language in § 4.115,
which addresses the assignment of
ratings when both renal and
cardiovascular conditions are present,
but replace the reference to ‘‘nephritis’’
in the first sentence of the proposed
revised section with ‘‘renal disease’’ to
more accurately reflect the applicability
of the provision. VA proposes to retitle
this provision as ‘‘Co-existence of Renal
and Cardiovascular Conditions’’ to
better address the amended content.
II. Proposed Changes to § 4.115a
Under the current VASRD, diseases of
the genitourinary system are listed at 38
CFR 4.115b with instructions directing
rating personnel to various rating
criteria found at 38 CFR 4.115a, when
appropriate. The rating criteria in
§ 4.115a address impairment of the
genitourinary system, including renal
dysfunction, voiding dysfunction, and
infections.
The introductory paragraph in
§ 4.115a states that when the VASRD
refers a decision maker to these areas of
dysfunction, only the predominant area
of disability will be considered for
rating purposes. VA proposes clarifying
this statement by noting that distinct
disabilities may be assigned separate
evaluations under this section, pursuant
to the pyramiding provisions in § 4.14.
This statement is intended to reflect that
when a particular diagnostic code refers
to multiple dysfunctions, only the
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
predominant dysfunction will be
evaluated for that diagnostic code.
Distinct disabilities resulting in nonoverlapping symptoms may be assigned
separate evaluations, however.
VA also proposes to make changes to
the rating criteria found in § 4.115a;
these proposed changes are discussed
below.
A. Renal Dysfunction
Currently, VA evaluates renal
dysfunction as follows:
A 100 percent evaluation is assigned
for any of the following: Requiring
regular dialysis, or precluding more
than sedentary activity from one of the
following: Persistent edema and
albuminuria; or, BUN more than 80
mg%; or, creatinine more than 8 mg%;
or, markedly decreased function of
kidney or other organ systems,
especially cardiovascular.
An 80 percent evaluation is assigned
for any of the following: Persistent
edema and albuminuria with BUN 40 to
80 mg%; or, creatinine 4 to 8 mg%; or,
generalized poor health characterized by
lethargy, weakness, anorexia, weight
loss, or limitation of exertion.
A 60 percent evaluation is assigned
for any of the following: Constant
albuminuria with some edema; or,
definite decrease in kidney function; or,
hypertension at least 40 percent
disabling under diagnostic code 7101.
A 30 percent evaluation is assigned
for any of the following: Albumin
constant or recurring with hyaline and
granular casts or red blood cells; or,
transient or slight edema or
hypertension at least 10 percent
disabling under diagnostic code 7101.
A 0 percent evaluation is assigned for
either albumin and casts with a history
of acute nephritis; or, hypertension noncompensable under diagnostic code
7101.
Subjective terms such as ‘‘markedly,’’
‘‘some,’’ and ‘‘slight’’ contribute to
inconsistent evaluation of genitourinary
disabilities rated under this criteria.
Therefore, VA proposes to replace these
subjective criteria with specific
objective laboratory findings, such as
the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Modern medicine states the ‘‘[GFR] is
widely accepted as the best overall
measure of kidney function in health
and disease.’’ Nat’l Kidney Found., ‘‘K/
DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for
Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation,
Classification, and Stratification,’’ Am.
J. Kidney Disease 39:S1–S266, S5
(2002), available at https://
www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/docs/
ckd_evaluation_classification_
stratification.pdf (last viewed Oct. 7,
2016). In clinical practice, subject
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
matter experts have noted an inverse
correlation between GFR and functional
impairment (e.g., lower GFRs
correspond to greater impairment), and
individuals with GFRs less than 60 mL/
min are considered to have chronic
renal disease. Id. at S12. A GFR less
than 60 mL/min is also a sign of renal
failure. Id. In addition to using the GFR
for evaluation purposes, VA also
proposes adding a note to the evaluation
criteria specifying that GFR, estimated
GFR (eGFR), and creatinine based
approximations are acceptable for
evaluation purposes, as each has been
shown to be an adequate indicator of the
stage of chronic kidney disease. Id. at
S81. The GFR used must be medically
appropriate and calculated by a medical
professional.
Based on the level of kidney function
generally associated with a particular
GFR, VA proposes assigning a 100
percent evaluation for a GFR less than
16 mL/min; an 80 percent evaluation for
a GFR between 16 and 29 mL/min; a 60
percent evaluation for a GFR between 30
and 59 mL/min; a 30 percent evaluation
for a GFR greater than or equal to 60
mL/min with at least one of the
following: Albumin/creatinine ratio
(ACR) greater than or equal to 2.5 g/gm
(nephrotic range proteinuria), or
hypertension at least 10 percent
disabling under diagnostic code 7101;
and a 0 percent evaluation for a GFR
greater than or equal to 60 mL/min with
at least one of the following: ACR
greater than or equal to .03 g/gm but less
than or equal to 2.49 g/gm, or
hypertension that is non-compensable
under diagnostic code 7101. These
levels of evaluation correlate to a
modified staging classification of
chronic kidney disease by the National
Kidney Foundation. Id. At the 100
percent evaluation, the designated GFR
is associated with kidney failure and, at
the 0 percent evaluation, the designated
GFR is associated with an increased risk
of kidney damage where a diagnosis of
chronic kidney disease has been made.
Id. Intermediate levels of evaluation at
the 30, 60, and 80 percent levels
correspond to the remaining stages of
chronic kidney disease as they increase
in severity as manifest by declining GFR
or increasing proteinuria.
Proteinuria is considered in the
evaluation of chronic kidney disease at
the 30 and 0 percent levels because GFR
measures only the ability of the kidneys
to filter the blood and does not always
provide a complete picture of renal
disease. For example, in the early stages
of chronic renal disease resulting from
kidney damage, GFR may be within the
normal range and impairment may be
characterized by other diagnostic
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35141
abnormalities, such as increased
secretion of protein in the urine
(proteinuria). Id. at S71. Proteinuria, as
measured by increased urinary
excretion of albumin, is an early and
sensitive marker of kidney damage in
many types of chronic kidney disease.
Id. at S48, S101. Therefore, VA proposes
that an ACR of 2.5 g/gm or greater (also
called nephrotic range proteinuria)
would warrant a 30 percent evaluation
and an ACR of at least 0.03 g/gm but no
more than 2.49 g/gm—i.e., urinary
albumin that does not reach the level of
nephrotic range proteinuria—would
warrant a 0 percent evaluation. VA
would not eliminate reference to
hypertension in the 0 and 30 percent
evaluation criteria because sustained
elevation of arterial blood pressure may
be a consequence of chronic kidney
disease. Id. at S125–26.
Finally, a 100 percent evaluation
would still be assigned for chronic
kidney disease requiring regular, routine
dialysis. VA intends to also extend this
evaluation to individuals requiring a
kidney transplant who may not yet
require regular, routine dialysis. Often,
a patient with rapidly deteriorating
chronic kidney disease will be placed
on a transplant list before they require
regular, routine dialysis, although
dialysis may actually be required before
the transplant is performed.
B. Urinary Tract Infection
VA proposes to preserve the existing
rating criteria for urinary tract infection
with little change. VA does, however,
propose to clarify the criteria for a 30
percent evaluation by specifying that
drainage would be by stent or
nephrostomy tube. This differentiates
drainage via catheterization. Stent or
nephrostomy tube insertion are surgical
procedures and require more intensive
medical management than drainage via
catheterization. Catheterization is not
medically consistent with the remainder
of the criteria required for a 30 percent
evaluation because the need for
catheterization is not generally
accompanied by frequent
hospitalization (greater than two times/
year) or continuous intensive
management.
For the 10 percent evaluation, VA
proposes to replace the ambiguous
phrase ‘‘intermittent intensive
management’’ with ‘‘suppressive drug
therapy lasting six months or longer.’’
Antibiotic and suppressive medications
are typically the treatment used to treat
urinary tract infections. Charles Kodner
et al., ‘‘Recurrent Urinary Tract
Infections in Women: Diagnosis and
Management,’’ 82(6) Am. Family
Physician 638–43 (2010); B. Lee et al.,
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
35142
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Methenamine hippurate for preventing
urinary tract infections,’’ The Cochrane
Library (Oct. 17, 2012), https://
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/
14651858.CD003265.pub3/abstract (last
visited April 16, 2014). However, the
term ‘‘intensive management’’ suggests
something beyond short-term courses of
antibiotic treatment for urinary tract
infections; this is not clear from the
current definition. As such, VA intends
to replace ‘‘intensive management’’ with
the objective criterion of ‘‘suppressive
drug therapy lasting six months or
longer.’’ As for the length of time
selected, suppressive therapy is more
appropriate for a chronic infection. B.
Lee, supra. Recurrent, or chronic,
infections are generally defined as two
or more infections in six months, and
the recommended treatment is six to
twelve months of suppressive drug
therapy. Kodner, supra. Therefore, VA
proposes a 10 percent evaluation when
there are one to two hospitalizations per
year for urinary tract infections, or
suppressive drug therapy lasting six
months or longer is required.
The addition of a 0 percent evaluation
is also proposed and would be
applicable if a veteran has urinary tract
infections that require suppressive drug
therapy for less than 6 months. Under
this evaluation, drug suppressive
therapy lasting six months or longer is
not required. This proposed evaluation
would cover cases that are responsive to
treatment and/or are not severe enough
to require suppressive drug therapy for
six months of more. It would also ease
field application by specifying noncompensable criteria that can be
compared to the criteria warranting a
compensable evaluation.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Proposed Changes to § 4.115b
A. Diagnostic Codes (DCs) 7508 and
7510
VA proposes to amend these DCs
based on a better understanding of the
disease process and the impact of
treatment. When imbalances occur in
the body, substances in urine can form
solid pieces within the urinary tract.
These pieces are commonly referred to
as stones. Nephrolithiasis, to which
diagnostic code 7508 currently applies,
is another name for kidney stones.
Ureterolithiasis (current DC 7510) refers
to stones in the ureter, which is the tube
that carries urine from the kidney to the
bladder.
Regardless of whether the stone is in
the kidney or the ureter, symptoms may
include abdominal and/or back pain
and blood in the urine. This shared
symptomology leads to similar
functional impairment. Therefore, VA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
proposes to delete existing DC 7510 and
to evaluate stones in either the kidney
or the ureter under diagnostic code
7508.
Nephrocalcinosis, a disorder in which
excess calcium accumulates in the
kidneys, does not result in symptoms.
Rather, if the accumulation of calcium
leads to the creation of stones, the
stones themselves may cause symptoms.
This condition is commonly evaluated
under DC 7508 as analogous to
nephrolithiasis, and VA proposes that it
continue to be evaluated under this
code, but that it be expressly added to
the diagnostic code for ease of field
application. Therefore, to better express
the conditions to be evaluated under DC
7508, VA proposes to rename it as
‘‘Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/
Nephrocalcinosis.’’
Proposed DC 7508 would provide a
30-percent rating for recurrent stone
formation requiring invasive or noninvasive procedures more than two
times per year, as current DC 7508 does,
but would no longer provide a 30percent rating for diet or drug therapy,
because such therapies have no specific
relationship to these disabilities and are
widely recommended for the majority of
medical diseases and conditions.
B. DCs 7520 Through 7522
Current DCs 7520 and 7521 provide
compensation for actual physical
removal of the penis or glans. An
evaluation of 30 percent is provided
when there is removal of half or more
of the penis under DC 7520. In addition,
a 20 percent evaluation is assigned
when there is removal of the glans
under DC 7521. Current DCs 7520 and
7521 also permit rating these conditions
alternatively as voiding dysfunction in
§ 4.115a. VA proposes to no longer rate
these conditions as voiding dysfunction,
which pertains to issues of leakage and
frequency and the use of an appliance
or absorbent materials. VA also
proposes to revise DCs 7520 and 7521
to include a footnote reference to
consider entitlement to Special Monthly
Compensation (SMC) for loss of a
creative organ under § 3.350. This is
meant to correct the omission of this
note from previous versions of the
VASRD. Removal of half or more of the
penis, or removal of the glans, may
result in loss of a creative organ.
Therefore, although consideration of
SMC is considered with application of
these diagnostic codes under current
policy, this change would ensure
consistent consideration of SMC for loss
of a creative organ.
VA proposes to revise DC 7522 to
encompass erectile dysfunction (ED),
regardless of etiology. In making this
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
change, VA intends to retitle this
diagnostic code, ‘‘Erectile dysfunction.’’
ED can occur with or without deformity
of the penis, and is a symptom of many
systemic, psychological, and metabolic
diseases. W. Ludwig, ‘‘Organic causes of
erectile dysfunction in men under 40,’’
92(1) Urologia Internationalis 1–6
(2014).
VA proposes to no longer provide a
20-percent rating for this condition,
whether with or without penile
deformity. VA provides disability
compensation for conditions that result
in reduced earning capacity. 38 U.S.C.
1155. Erectile dysfunction, with or
without penile deformity, is not
associated with reductions in earning
capacity. Therefore, VA proposes to
provide a 0 percent evaluation for this
condition. Section 4.115b’s footnote
regarding consideration of SMC for loss
of use a creative organ where warranted
would continue to apply to DC 7522.
VA also proposes to add a note
clarifying that Peyronie’s disease is not
a ratable condition. Peyronie’s disease
should not be rated analogously to ED.
C. DC 7524
VA does not propose any substantive
changes to current DC 7524. However, it
does intend to correct a typographical
error in the last sentence of the existing
note, which refers to ‘‘underscended’’
rather than ‘‘undescended’’ testis.
D. DCs 7525, 7527, 7533, 7534, and
7537
Currently, each of these diagnostic
codes identifies one or more conditions
which have similar symptomatology
and functional impairment. The
conditions identified are not an
exclusive list; therefore, other
conditions are often rated as analogous
to one of these diagnostic codes. To
assist the field in ensuring that the
appropriate diagnostic criteria is used to
evaluate other conditions not currently
listed, VA proposes to rename each of
these diagnostic codes and/or include a
note identifying those conditions not
currently listed.
First, VA proposes to rename DC 7525
as ‘‘Prostatitis, urethritis, epididymitis,
orchitis (unilateral or bilateral), chronic
only,’’ as these diagnoses all refer to
urinary tract infections that do not
involve the kidneys and have similar
symptoms. Prostatitis would not be
included in proposed revised DC 7527,
‘‘Prostate gland injuries, infections,
hypertrophy, postoperative residuals,
bladder outlet obstruction,’’ because it is
rarely caused by a bacterial infection
and generally results in repeated
bladder infections. J. Stevermer et al.,
‘‘Treatment of Prostatitis,’’ 61(10) Am.
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Family Physician 3015–22 (2000). As a
result, the diagnoses contained in DC
7527 are not consistent with nonbacterial prostatitis. In addition, the
symptoms caused by prostatitis—
recurrent bladder infections—are most
similar to the diagnoses contained in DC
7525. There is no change to the
evaluation criteria for this DC.
VA also proposes to rename DC 7527
to include bladder outlet obstruction,
which has the same functional
impairment and symptomatology as the
other conditions currently encompassed
in this code. Bladder outlet obstruction
is not included in current DC 7517,
‘‘Bladder, injury of,’’ because this
condition is not caused by an injury to
the bladder, but is generally caused by
another condition, such as benign
prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), which is
addressed in DC 7527. R. Dmochowski,
‘‘Bladder Outlet Obstruction: Etiology
and Evaluation,’’ 7(Supp. 6) Reviews in
Urology S3–S13 (2005). In addition, the
symptomatology for this condition may
include urinary tract infections, rather
than only voiding dysfunction, as
contemplated by DC 7517. There is no
change to the evaluation criteria for this
DC.
VA proposes to add a note to DC 7533
to identify some of the most common
cystic kidney diseases seen in the
veteran population, to include
polycystic disease, uremic medullary
cystic disease, medullary sponge
kidney, and similar conditions such as
hereditary nephritis, Alport’s syndrome,
cystinosis, primary oxalosis, and Fabry’s
disease. M. Bisceglia et al., ‘‘Renal cystic
diseases: a review,’’ 13(1) Advances in
Anatomic Pathology 26–56 (2006).
These diseases are being added as a
medical update and would ensure
proper field application of this DC.
There is no change to the evaluation
criteria for this DC.
Regarding DC 7534, which deals with
atherosclerotic renal disease, VA
proposes to specifically identify another
atherosclerotic renal disease—large
vessel disease, unspecified. Renal
Failure: Diagnosis and Treatment 65 (J.
Gary Abuelo ed. 1995). This disease is
being added as a medical update and
would ensure proper field application of
this DC. There is no change to the
evaluation criteria.
Finally, VA proposes to amend DC
7537 to identify the most common forms
of interstitial nephritis resulting from
the high prevalence of the disease,
including gouty nephropathy and
disorders of calcium metabolism. There
is no change to the evaluation criteria.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
E. DCs 7539 and 7541
VA proposes to move all conditions
contained in DC 7541 to DC 7539, with
the exception of renal involvement in
diabetes mellitus, to encompass all
systemic conditions that impact the
kidneys. All of these conditions are, as
amyloid diseases, systemic diseases
with renal involvement and therefore
are more appropriately evaluated under
a single DC. For clarity and ease of field
application, VA proposes to add a note
to DC 7539 to identify all forms of
glomerulonephritis, nephritis, and renal
vasculitis encountered with systemic
diseases. There is no change to the
evaluation criteria.
As for renal involvement in diabetes
mellitus (e.g., diabetic nephropathy),
VA proposes to continue rating this
condition separately under DC 7541.
Although this condition would also be
rated as renal dysfunction, VA finds
there is a need to track this particular
condition given its incidence and
prevalence in the Veteran population,
especially with regard to claims related
to Agent Orange exposure.
F. DC 7542
Based on modern clinical findings,
neurogenic bladder should continue to
be rated as a voiding dysfunction.
However, due to high rate of urinary
tract infections, VA proposes that this
condition may be rated as voiding
dysfunction or urinary tract infection,
whichever is predominant. D.
Sauerwein, ‘‘Urinary tract infection in
patients with neurogenic bladder
dysfunction,’’ 19(6) Int’l J. of
Antimicrobial Agents 592–97 (2002).
G. New Proposed DC 7543
VA proposes the introduction of new
DC 7543, ‘‘Varicocele/Hydrocele,’’ to
reflect related conditions of the urinary
tract that have not previously been
recognized for disability evaluation
purposes. Varicocele is a dilatation of
the veins along the cord that receives
blood from the testicles. Hydrocele is a
collection of fluid in the scrotum.
The medical community now
recognizes that these conditions may be
associated with a decrease in fertility
and, in rare instances, may be associated
with infertility. Center for Male
Reproductive Medicine and Vasectomy
Reversal, ‘‘Varicocele Repair,’’ https://
www.malereproduction.com/maleinfertility/treatment/varicocelerepair.php (last accessed April 16,
2014). As a decrease in fertility, or the
existence of infertility, does not cause a
reduction in earning capacity, VA
proposes to assign a 0 percent
evaluation to these conditions. In
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35143
instances where there is a clinical
finding of infertility, these conditions
may support eligibility for SMC due to
loss of use of a creative organ.
Therefore, to best administer this
benefit, VA proposes a diagnostic code
for these conditions that provides a 0
percent evaluation. Section 4.115b’s
footnote directing consideration of SMC
would apply to DC 7543, consistent
with the other DCs in the VASRD
addressing a creative organ.
H. New Proposed DC 7544
VA proposes the introduction of new
DC 7544, ‘‘Renal disease caused by viral
infection such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and
Hepatitis C,’’ to reflect renal
dysfunctions associated with HIV and
hepatitis because of increasing
prevalence and incidence of diseases
caused by these viruses. Perico Norberto
et al., ‘‘Hepatitis C Infection and
Chronic Renal Diseases,’’ 4(1) Clinical J.
Am. Soc’y of Nephrology 207–20 (2009).
Hepatitis A, an acute liver disease, does
not cause chronic renal disease and is
therefore not included in this DC.
VA proposes to evaluate this DC as
renal dysfunction under § 4.115a
because, when the liver is damaged due
to Hepatitis B or C infection, the
accumulation of toxins in the blood can
damage the kidneys, causing renal
dysfunction. HIV-associated renal
dysfunctions have several different
etiologies, but can include direct HIV
infection of the kidney, kidney damage
caused by drugs used to treat HIV, and
fluid loss caused by various processes
associated with the advanced disease
process. Moro O. Salifu, ‘‘HIVAssociated Nephropathy,’’ Medscape,
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/
246031-overview (Vecihi Batuman ed.,
2013) (last accessed April 16, 2014).
I. New Proposed DC 7545
VA proposes the introduction of new
DC 7545, ‘‘Bladder, diverticulum of.’’
Currently, there is no DC for
diverticulum of the bladder and, as
such, it is generally evaluated in the
field as analogous to fistula of the
bladder. A bladder fistula is an
abnormal connection between the
bladder and another organ of the body
(e.g., the bowel). A bladder diverticulum
is an abnormal pouch or sac due to
weakness in the bladder’s muscular wall
that allows a portion of the bladder to
protrude. Urology Care Foundation,
‘‘Urology A–Z: Bladder Diverticulum,’’
https://www.urologyhealth.org/urology/
index.cfm?article=111 (last accessed
April 16, 2014). The two conditions
have dissimilar symptomatology and
result in dissimilar functional
impairment. A bladder fistula allows
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
35144
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
urine to escape the confines of the
bladder into another space such as the
rectum, or externally, causing urinary
leakage. A bladder diverticulum allows
urine to remain in the bladder longer,
often resulting in infection as well as
voiding dysfunction.
The proposed addition of this new DC
would ensure that the condition is more
appropriately rated. VA proposes to rate
DC 7545 as voiding dysfunction or
urinary tract infection, whichever is
predominant, because these criteria best
capture the functional impairment
associated with this condition.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
VA has examined the economic,
interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action,
and it has been determined not to be a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VA’s impact analysis can be found as
a supporting document at
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of this
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
available on VA’s Web site at
www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for VA Regulations Published from
FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would directly affect only
individuals and would not directly
affect any small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
proposed rule would be exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
affected by this document are 64.009,
Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.104,
Pension for Non-Service-Connected
Disability for Veterans; 64.109, Veterans
Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on May 26,
2017, for publication.
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
4 as follows:
PART 4—SCHEDULE FOR RATING
DISABILITIES
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless
otherwise noted.
Subpart B—Disability Ratings
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
PO 00000
Dated: July 21, 2017.
Michael Shores,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management,
Office of the Secretary, Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Sfmt 4702
■
2. Revise § 4.115 to read as follows:
§ 4.115 Co-Existence of renal and
cardiovascular conditions.
Separate ratings are not to be assigned
for disability from disease of the heart
and any form of renal disease, on
account of the close interrelationships
of cardiovascular diseases. If, however,
absence of a kidney is the sole renal
disability, even if removal was required
because of nephritis, the absent kidney
and any hypertension or heart disease
will be separately rated. Also, in the
event that chronic renal disease has
progressed to the point where regular
dialysis is required, any coexisting
hypertension or heart disease will be
separately rated.
■ 3. Amend § 4.115a by revising the
introductory text and the table entries
regarding ‘‘Renal dysfuntion’’ and
‘‘Urinary tract infection’’ to read as
follows:
§ 4.115a Ratings of the genitourinary
system—dysfunctions.
Diseases of the genitourinary system
generally result in disabilities related to
renal or voiding dysfunctions,
infections, or a combination of these.
The following section provides
descriptions of various levels of
disability in each of these symptom
areas. Where diagnostic codes refer the
decision maker to these specific areas of
dysfunction, only the predominant area
of dysfunction shall be considered for
rating purposes. Distinct disabilities
may be evaluated separately under this
section, pursuant to § 4.14, if the
symptoms do not overlap. Since the
areas of dysfunction described below do
not cover all symptoms resulting from
genitourinary diseases, specific
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
35145
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
diagnoses may include a description of
symptoms assigned to that diagnosis.
Rating
Renal dysfunction:
Chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 16 mL/min; or requiring regular, routine dialysis or
kidney transplant .......................................................................................................................................................................
Chronic kidney disease with GFR 16 to 29 mL/min ....................................................................................................................
Chronic kidney disease with GFR 30 to 59 mL/min ....................................................................................................................
Chronic kidney disease with GFR ≥60 mL/min with at least one of the following:
Albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥2.5 g/gm (nephrotic range proteinuria); or
Hypertension at least 10 percent disabling under diagnostic code 7101 .............................................................................
Chronic kidney disease with GFR ≥60 mL/min with at least one of the following:
Albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) from 0.03 g/gm to 2.49 g/gm; or
Hypertension that is non-compensable under diagnostic code 7101 ...................................................................................
Note: GFR, estimated GFR (eGFR), and creatinine based approximations of GFR will be accepted for evaluation purposes
under this section when determined to be appropriate and calculated by a medical professional.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Urinary tract infection:
Poor renal function: Rate as renal dysfunction.
Recurrent symptomatic infection requiring drainage by stent or nephrostomy tube; or requiring greater than 2 hospitalizations per year; or requiring continuous intensive management ...............................................................................................
Recurrent symptomatic infection requiring 1–2 hospitalizations per year or suppressive drug therapy lasting six months or
longer ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Recurrent symptomatic infection not requiring hospitalization, but requiring suppressive drug therapy for less than 6 months
4. Amend § 4.115b by:
a. Removing diagnostic code 7510.
b. Revising diagnostic codes 7508,
7520, 7521, 7522, 7524, 7525, 7527,
7533, 7534, 7537, 7539, 7541, and 7542.
■
■
■
100
80
60
30
0
*
30
10
0
§ 4.115b Ratings of the genitourinary
system—diagnoses.
c. Adding diagnostic codes 7543,
7544, and 7545.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
Rating
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7520 Penis, removal of half or more ................................................................................................................................................
7521 Penis, removal of glans ...........................................................................................................................................................
7522 Erectile dysfunction, with or without penile deformity ..............................................................................................................
Note: Peyronie’s disease is not a ratable condition.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7524 Testis, removal:
Both ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
One ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Note: In cases of the removal of one testis as the result of a service-incurred injury or disease, other than an undescended
or congenitally undeveloped testis, with the absence or nonfunctioning of the other testis unrelated to service, an evaluation of 30 percent will be assigned for the service-connected testicular loss. Testis, undescended, or congenitally undeveloped is not a ratable disability.
7525 Prostatitis, urethritis, epididymitis, orchitis (unilateral or bilateral), chronic only:
Rate as urinary tract infection.
For tubercular infections: Rate in accordance with §§ 4.88b or 4.89, whichever is appropriate.
7527 Prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy, postoperative residuals, bladder outlet obstruction:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract infection, whichever is predominant.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
*
7508 Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis:
Rate as hydronephrosis, except for recurrent stone formation requiring invasive or non-invasive procedures more than two
times/year ..................................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7533 Cystic diseases of the kidneys:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
Note: Cystic diseases of the kidneys include, but are not limited to, polycystic disease, uremic medullary cystic disease,
medullary sponge kidney, and similar conditions such as hereditary nephritis, Alport’s syndrome, cystinosis, primary
oxalosis, and Fabry’s disease.
7534 Atherosclerotic renal disease (renal artery stenosis, atheroembolic renal disease, or large vessel disease, unspecified):
Rate as renal dysfunction.
*
7537
*
*
*
*
Interstitial nephritis, including gouty nephropathy, disorders of calcium metabolism:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
*
28JYP1
30
1 30
1 20
10
1 30
10
*
35146
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Rating
Rate as renal dysfunction.
*
*
*
*
*
*
7539 Renal amyloid disease:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
Note: This diagnostic code pertains to renal involvement in secondary glomerulonephritis/vasculitis and in other systemic
diseases, such as Lupus erythematosus-Systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis, Henoch-Schonlein syndrome,
Scleroderma, Hemolytic uremic syndrome, Polyarteritis, Wegener’s granulomatosis, other Vasculitis and its derivatives,
Goodpasture’s syndrome, sickle cell disease, and other secondary glomerulonephritis.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7541 Renal involvement in diabetes mellitus type I or II:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
7542 Neurogenic bladder:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract infection, whichever is predominant.
7543 Varicocele/Hydrocele ...............................................................................................................................................................
7544 Renal disease caused by viral infection such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
7545 Bladder, diverticulum of:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract infection, whichever is predominant.
*
1 Review
10
for entitlement to special monthly compensation under § 3.350 of this chapter.
through 7522, 7524, 7525, 7527, 7533,
7534, 7537, 7539, 7541, and 7542.
■ d. In § 4.115b, adding diagnostic
codes 7543 through 7545.
5. Amend Appendix A to Part 4 by:
a. Adding § 4.115.
■ b. Revising § 4.115a.
■ c. In § 4.115b, revising the entries for
diagnostic codes 7508, 7510, 7520
■
■
Section
........................
........................
Appendix A to Part 4—Table of
Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
4.115 .........................................
4.115a .......................................
The additions and revisions to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
Retitled and revised [insert effective date of final rule].
Re-designated and revised as § 4.115b; new § 4.115a ‘‘Ratings of the genitourinary systemdysfunctions’’ added February 17, 1994; revised [insert effective date of final rule].
4.115b.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Evaluation February 17, 1994; removed [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7510
7520
7521
7522
*
*
*
*
*
Evaluation February 17, 1994; title, criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7508
*
*
*
*
*
Criterion February 17, 1994; criterion, footnote [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion February 17, 1994; criterion, footnote [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion September 8, 1994; title, criterion, note [insert effective date of final rule].
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Note July 6, 1950; evaluation February 17, 1994; evaluation September 8, 1994; note [insert
effective date of final rule].
7525 Criterion March 11, 1969; evaluation February 17, 1994; title [insert effective date of final
rule].
7524
*
*
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
Added February 17, 1994; title [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7537
*
*
*
*
Added February 17, 1994; note [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7539
*
*
*
*
Added February 17, 1994; title [insert effective date of final rule].
Added February 17, 1994; criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7541
7542
*
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
*
*
Added February 17, 1994; title and note [insert effective date of final rule].
Added February 17, 1994; title [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7533
7534
*
*
*
*
*
Criterion February 17, 1994; title [insert effective date of final rule].
*
7527
*
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
35147
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Diagnostic
code No.
Section
7543
7544
7545
*
*
Added [insert effective date of final rule].
Added [insert effective date of final rule].
Added [insert effective date of final rule].
*
6. Amend Appendix B to Part 4 by:
■ a. Revising diagnostic codes 7508,
7522, 7525, 7527, 7533, 7534, 7537, and
7541.
■
*
*
*
*
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
b. Removing diagnostic code 7510;
■ c. Adding diagnostic codes 7543
through 7545.
■
Appendix B to Part 4—Numerical Index
of Disabilities
Diagnostic code No.
The Genitourinary System
*
*
7508 ................................................
*
*
Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis.
*
*
*
*
*
7522 ................................................
*
Erectile dysfunction.
*
*
*
*
*
7525 ................................................
7527 ................................................
*
*
*
*
*
Prostatitis, urethritis, epididymitis, orchitis (unilateral or bilateral), chronic only.
Prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy, postoperative residuals, bladder outlet obstruction.
*
*
7533 ................................................
7534 ................................................
*
*
*
*
*
Cystic diseases of the kidneys.
Atherosclerotic renal disease (renal artery stenosis, atheroembolic renal disease, or large vessel disease,
unspecified).
*
*
7537 ................................................
*
*
*
*
Interstitial nephritis, including gouty nephropathy, disorders of calcium metabolism.
*
*
*
7541 ................................................
*
*
Renal involvement in diabetes mellitus type I or II.
*
*
*
7543 ................................................
7544 ................................................
7545 ................................................
*
*
*
*
Varicocele/Hydrocele.
Renal disease caused by viral infection such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C.
Bladder, diverticulum of.
*
*
*
*
7. Amend Appendix C to Part 4 by:
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic
codes 7508, 7522, 7525, 7527, 7533,
7537, and 7541.
■
■
*
*
*
*
b. Removing the reference to
diagnostic code 7510;
■ c. Adding diagnostic codes 7543
through 7545.
*
*
*
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 4—Alphabetical
Index of Disabilities
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Bladder:
*
*
*
*
*
*
Diverticulum of ..............................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Erectile dysfunction ..............................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Interstitial nephritis, including gouty nephropathy, disorders of calcium metabolism .........................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Kidney:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
7545
7522
7537
*
35148
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Cystic diseases of the ..................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis ................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy, postoperative residuals, bladder outlet obstruction ................................................
Prostatitis, urethritis, epididymitis, orchitis (unilateral or bilateral), chronic only .................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7533
7508
7527
7525
*
Renal:
*
*
*
*
*
*
Disease caused by viral infection such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C .............................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Involvement in diabetes mellitus type I or II .................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Varicocele/Hydrocele ...........................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0365; FRL–9965–29–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Kentucky;
Revisions to Louisville; Definitions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On August 29, 2012, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
the Kentucky Division for Air Quality
(KDAQ), submitted changes to the
Kentucky State Implementation Plan
(SIP) on behalf of the Louisville Metro
Air Pollution Control District (District).
The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) is proposing to approve a portion
of the submission that modifies the
District’s air quality regulations as
incorporated into the SIP. Specifically,
the revisions pertain to definitional
changes, including the modification of
the definition of ‘‘volatile organic
compounds’’. EPA is proposing to
approve this portion of the SIP revision
because the Commonwealth has
demonstrated that these changes are
consistent with the Clean Air Act. EPA
will act on the other portion of KDAQ’s
August 29, 2012, submittal in a separate
action.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
*
Written comments must be
received on or before August 28, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2017–0365 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nacosta C. Ward, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9140.
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2017–15765 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
*
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
*
7544
7541
7543
*
Ms. Ward can be reached via electronic
mail at ward.nacosta@epa.gov.
In the
Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this document. Any parties
interested in commenting on this
document should do so at this time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 11, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2017–15738 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35140-35148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15765]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900-AP16
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The Genitourinary Diseases and
Conditions
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs proposes to amend the
portion of the Schedule for Rating Disabilities that addresses the
genitourinary system. The purpose of this change is to update current
medical terminology, incorporate medical advances that have occurred
since the last review, and provide well-defined criteria in accordance
with actual, standard medical clinical practice. The proposed rule
reflects the most up-to-date medical knowledge and clinical practice of
nephrology and urology specialties, as well as comments from subject
matter experts and the public garnered during a public forum held
January 27-28, 2011.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202)
273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response
to ``RIN 2900-AP16--Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The Genitourinary
Diseases and Conditions.'' Copies of comments received will be
available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free number.) In addition, during
the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ioulia Vvedenskaya, M.D., M.B.A.,
Medical Officer, Part 4 VASRD Regulations Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9752.
(This is not a toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of the Department of Veterans
Affairs' (VA) ongoing revision of the Schedule for Rating Disabilities
(VASRD), VA proposes changes to the portion of the VASRD that addresses
the genitourinary system, which was last revised in 1994. See 59 FR
2523 (Jan. 18, 1994); see also 59 FR 46338 (Sep. 8, 1994). Through this
revision, VA aims to eliminate ambiguities, include medical conditions
not currently in the rating schedule, implement current, well-refined
medical criteria, and update terminology to reflect the most recent
medical advances.
I. Proposed Changes to Sec. 4.115
Currently, 38 CFR 4.115 (``Nephritis'') does not adequately reflect
current concepts of renal and urinary tract disease and conditions.
Regardless of specific disease pathology, kidney conditions generally
produce the same symptomatology and lead to the same functional
impairment. Therefore, for rating purposes, analysis of pathology, such
as is currently presented in the first three sentences of Sec. 4.115,
is unnecessary and VA proposes to remove this language.
However, VA proposes to retain the remainder of the language in
Sec. 4.115, which addresses the assignment of ratings when both renal
and cardiovascular conditions are present, but replace the reference to
``nephritis'' in the first sentence of the proposed revised section
with ``renal disease'' to more accurately reflect the applicability of
the provision. VA proposes to retitle this provision as ``Co-existence
of Renal and Cardiovascular Conditions'' to better address the amended
content.
II. Proposed Changes to Sec. 4.115a
Under the current VASRD, diseases of the genitourinary system are
listed at 38 CFR 4.115b with instructions directing rating personnel to
various rating criteria found at 38 CFR 4.115a, when appropriate. The
rating criteria in Sec. 4.115a address impairment of the genitourinary
system, including renal dysfunction, voiding dysfunction, and
infections.
The introductory paragraph in Sec. 4.115a states that when the
VASRD refers a decision maker to these areas of dysfunction, only the
predominant area of disability will be considered for rating purposes.
VA proposes clarifying this statement by noting that distinct
disabilities may be assigned separate evaluations under this section,
pursuant to the pyramiding provisions in Sec. 4.14. This statement is
intended to reflect that when a particular diagnostic code refers to
multiple dysfunctions, only the
[[Page 35141]]
predominant dysfunction will be evaluated for that diagnostic code.
Distinct disabilities resulting in non-overlapping symptoms may be
assigned separate evaluations, however.
VA also proposes to make changes to the rating criteria found in
Sec. 4.115a; these proposed changes are discussed below.
A. Renal Dysfunction
Currently, VA evaluates renal dysfunction as follows:
A 100 percent evaluation is assigned for any of the following:
Requiring regular dialysis, or precluding more than sedentary activity
from one of the following: Persistent edema and albuminuria; or, BUN
more than 80 mg%; or, creatinine more than 8 mg%; or, markedly
decreased function of kidney or other organ systems, especially
cardiovascular.
An 80 percent evaluation is assigned for any of the following:
Persistent edema and albuminuria with BUN 40 to 80 mg%; or, creatinine
4 to 8 mg%; or, generalized poor health characterized by lethargy,
weakness, anorexia, weight loss, or limitation of exertion.
A 60 percent evaluation is assigned for any of the following:
Constant albuminuria with some edema; or, definite decrease in kidney
function; or, hypertension at least 40 percent disabling under
diagnostic code 7101.
A 30 percent evaluation is assigned for any of the following:
Albumin constant or recurring with hyaline and granular casts or red
blood cells; or, transient or slight edema or hypertension at least 10
percent disabling under diagnostic code 7101.
A 0 percent evaluation is assigned for either albumin and casts
with a history of acute nephritis; or, hypertension non-compensable
under diagnostic code 7101.
Subjective terms such as ``markedly,'' ``some,'' and ``slight''
contribute to inconsistent evaluation of genitourinary disabilities
rated under this criteria. Therefore, VA proposes to replace these
subjective criteria with specific objective laboratory findings, such
as the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Modern medicine states the
``[GFR] is widely accepted as the best overall measure of kidney
function in health and disease.'' Nat'l Kidney Found., ``K/DOQI
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation,
Classification, and Stratification,'' Am. J. Kidney Disease 39:S1-S266,
S5 (2002), available at https://www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/docs/ckd_evaluation_classification_stratification.pdf (last viewed Oct.
7, 2016). In clinical practice, subject matter experts have noted an
inverse correlation between GFR and functional impairment (e.g., lower
GFRs correspond to greater impairment), and individuals with GFRs less
than 60 mL/min are considered to have chronic renal disease. Id. at
S12. A GFR less than 60 mL/min is also a sign of renal failure. Id. In
addition to using the GFR for evaluation purposes, VA also proposes
adding a note to the evaluation criteria specifying that GFR, estimated
GFR (eGFR), and creatinine based approximations are acceptable for
evaluation purposes, as each has been shown to be an adequate indicator
of the stage of chronic kidney disease. Id. at S81. The GFR used must
be medically appropriate and calculated by a medical professional.
Based on the level of kidney function generally associated with a
particular GFR, VA proposes assigning a 100 percent evaluation for a
GFR less than 16 mL/min; an 80 percent evaluation for a GFR between 16
and 29 mL/min; a 60 percent evaluation for a GFR between 30 and 59 mL/
min; a 30 percent evaluation for a GFR greater than or equal to 60 mL/
min with at least one of the following: Albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR)
greater than or equal to 2.5 g/gm (nephrotic range proteinuria), or
hypertension at least 10 percent disabling under diagnostic code 7101;
and a 0 percent evaluation for a GFR greater than or equal to 60 mL/min
with at least one of the following: ACR greater than or equal to .03 g/
gm but less than or equal to 2.49 g/gm, or hypertension that is non-
compensable under diagnostic code 7101. These levels of evaluation
correlate to a modified staging classification of chronic kidney
disease by the National Kidney Foundation. Id. At the 100 percent
evaluation, the designated GFR is associated with kidney failure and,
at the 0 percent evaluation, the designated GFR is associated with an
increased risk of kidney damage where a diagnosis of chronic kidney
disease has been made. Id. Intermediate levels of evaluation at the 30,
60, and 80 percent levels correspond to the remaining stages of chronic
kidney disease as they increase in severity as manifest by declining
GFR or increasing proteinuria.
Proteinuria is considered in the evaluation of chronic kidney
disease at the 30 and 0 percent levels because GFR measures only the
ability of the kidneys to filter the blood and does not always provide
a complete picture of renal disease. For example, in the early stages
of chronic renal disease resulting from kidney damage, GFR may be
within the normal range and impairment may be characterized by other
diagnostic abnormalities, such as increased secretion of protein in the
urine (proteinuria). Id. at S71. Proteinuria, as measured by increased
urinary excretion of albumin, is an early and sensitive marker of
kidney damage in many types of chronic kidney disease. Id. at S48,
S101. Therefore, VA proposes that an ACR of 2.5 g/gm or greater (also
called nephrotic range proteinuria) would warrant a 30 percent
evaluation and an ACR of at least 0.03 g/gm but no more than 2.49 g/
gm--i.e., urinary albumin that does not reach the level of nephrotic
range proteinuria--would warrant a 0 percent evaluation. VA would not
eliminate reference to hypertension in the 0 and 30 percent evaluation
criteria because sustained elevation of arterial blood pressure may be
a consequence of chronic kidney disease. Id. at S125-26.
Finally, a 100 percent evaluation would still be assigned for
chronic kidney disease requiring regular, routine dialysis. VA intends
to also extend this evaluation to individuals requiring a kidney
transplant who may not yet require regular, routine dialysis. Often, a
patient with rapidly deteriorating chronic kidney disease will be
placed on a transplant list before they require regular, routine
dialysis, although dialysis may actually be required before the
transplant is performed.
B. Urinary Tract Infection
VA proposes to preserve the existing rating criteria for urinary
tract infection with little change. VA does, however, propose to
clarify the criteria for a 30 percent evaluation by specifying that
drainage would be by stent or nephrostomy tube. This differentiates
drainage via catheterization. Stent or nephrostomy tube insertion are
surgical procedures and require more intensive medical management than
drainage via catheterization. Catheterization is not medically
consistent with the remainder of the criteria required for a 30 percent
evaluation because the need for catheterization is not generally
accompanied by frequent hospitalization (greater than two times/year)
or continuous intensive management.
For the 10 percent evaluation, VA proposes to replace the ambiguous
phrase ``intermittent intensive management'' with ``suppressive drug
therapy lasting six months or longer.'' Antibiotic and suppressive
medications are typically the treatment used to treat urinary tract
infections. Charles Kodner et al., ``Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
in Women: Diagnosis and Management,'' 82(6) Am. Family Physician 638-43
(2010); B. Lee et al.,
[[Page 35142]]
``Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections,'' The
Cochrane Library (Oct. 17, 2012), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003265.pub3/abstract (last visited April 16, 2014).
However, the term ``intensive management'' suggests something beyond
short-term courses of antibiotic treatment for urinary tract
infections; this is not clear from the current definition. As such, VA
intends to replace ``intensive management'' with the objective
criterion of ``suppressive drug therapy lasting six months or longer.''
As for the length of time selected, suppressive therapy is more
appropriate for a chronic infection. B. Lee, supra. Recurrent, or
chronic, infections are generally defined as two or more infections in
six months, and the recommended treatment is six to twelve months of
suppressive drug therapy. Kodner, supra. Therefore, VA proposes a 10
percent evaluation when there are one to two hospitalizations per year
for urinary tract infections, or suppressive drug therapy lasting six
months or longer is required.
The addition of a 0 percent evaluation is also proposed and would
be applicable if a veteran has urinary tract infections that require
suppressive drug therapy for less than 6 months. Under this evaluation,
drug suppressive therapy lasting six months or longer is not required.
This proposed evaluation would cover cases that are responsive to
treatment and/or are not severe enough to require suppressive drug
therapy for six months of more. It would also ease field application by
specifying non-compensable criteria that can be compared to the
criteria warranting a compensable evaluation.
III. Proposed Changes to Sec. 4.115b
A. Diagnostic Codes (DCs) 7508 and 7510
VA proposes to amend these DCs based on a better understanding of
the disease process and the impact of treatment. When imbalances occur
in the body, substances in urine can form solid pieces within the
urinary tract. These pieces are commonly referred to as stones.
Nephrolithiasis, to which diagnostic code 7508 currently applies, is
another name for kidney stones. Ureterolithiasis (current DC 7510)
refers to stones in the ureter, which is the tube that carries urine
from the kidney to the bladder.
Regardless of whether the stone is in the kidney or the ureter,
symptoms may include abdominal and/or back pain and blood in the urine.
This shared symptomology leads to similar functional impairment.
Therefore, VA proposes to delete existing DC 7510 and to evaluate
stones in either the kidney or the ureter under diagnostic code 7508.
Nephrocalcinosis, a disorder in which excess calcium accumulates in
the kidneys, does not result in symptoms. Rather, if the accumulation
of calcium leads to the creation of stones, the stones themselves may
cause symptoms. This condition is commonly evaluated under DC 7508 as
analogous to nephrolithiasis, and VA proposes that it continue to be
evaluated under this code, but that it be expressly added to the
diagnostic code for ease of field application. Therefore, to better
express the conditions to be evaluated under DC 7508, VA proposes to
rename it as ``Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis.''
Proposed DC 7508 would provide a 30-percent rating for recurrent
stone formation requiring invasive or non-invasive procedures more than
two times per year, as current DC 7508 does, but would no longer
provide a 30-percent rating for diet or drug therapy, because such
therapies have no specific relationship to these disabilities and are
widely recommended for the majority of medical diseases and conditions.
B. DCs 7520 Through 7522
Current DCs 7520 and 7521 provide compensation for actual physical
removal of the penis or glans. An evaluation of 30 percent is provided
when there is removal of half or more of the penis under DC 7520. In
addition, a 20 percent evaluation is assigned when there is removal of
the glans under DC 7521. Current DCs 7520 and 7521 also permit rating
these conditions alternatively as voiding dysfunction in Sec. 4.115a.
VA proposes to no longer rate these conditions as voiding dysfunction,
which pertains to issues of leakage and frequency and the use of an
appliance or absorbent materials. VA also proposes to revise DCs 7520
and 7521 to include a footnote reference to consider entitlement to
Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) for loss of a creative organ under
Sec. 3.350. This is meant to correct the omission of this note from
previous versions of the VASRD. Removal of half or more of the penis,
or removal of the glans, may result in loss of a creative organ.
Therefore, although consideration of SMC is considered with application
of these diagnostic codes under current policy, this change would
ensure consistent consideration of SMC for loss of a creative organ.
VA proposes to revise DC 7522 to encompass erectile dysfunction
(ED), regardless of etiology. In making this change, VA intends to
retitle this diagnostic code, ``Erectile dysfunction.'' ED can occur
with or without deformity of the penis, and is a symptom of many
systemic, psychological, and metabolic diseases. W. Ludwig, ``Organic
causes of erectile dysfunction in men under 40,'' 92(1) Urologia
Internationalis 1-6 (2014).
VA proposes to no longer provide a 20-percent rating for this
condition, whether with or without penile deformity. VA provides
disability compensation for conditions that result in reduced earning
capacity. 38 U.S.C. 1155. Erectile dysfunction, with or without penile
deformity, is not associated with reductions in earning capacity.
Therefore, VA proposes to provide a 0 percent evaluation for this
condition. Section 4.115b's footnote regarding consideration of SMC for
loss of use a creative organ where warranted would continue to apply to
DC 7522.
VA also proposes to add a note clarifying that Peyronie's disease
is not a ratable condition. Peyronie's disease should not be rated
analogously to ED.
C. DC 7524
VA does not propose any substantive changes to current DC 7524.
However, it does intend to correct a typographical error in the last
sentence of the existing note, which refers to ``underscended'' rather
than ``undescended'' testis.
D. DCs 7525, 7527, 7533, 7534, and 7537
Currently, each of these diagnostic codes identifies one or more
conditions which have similar symptomatology and functional impairment.
The conditions identified are not an exclusive list; therefore, other
conditions are often rated as analogous to one of these diagnostic
codes. To assist the field in ensuring that the appropriate diagnostic
criteria is used to evaluate other conditions not currently listed, VA
proposes to rename each of these diagnostic codes and/or include a note
identifying those conditions not currently listed.
First, VA proposes to rename DC 7525 as ``Prostatitis, urethritis,
epididymitis, orchitis (unilateral or bilateral), chronic only,'' as
these diagnoses all refer to urinary tract infections that do not
involve the kidneys and have similar symptoms. Prostatitis would not be
included in proposed revised DC 7527, ``Prostate gland injuries,
infections, hypertrophy, postoperative residuals, bladder outlet
obstruction,'' because it is rarely caused by a bacterial infection and
generally results in repeated bladder infections. J. Stevermer et al.,
``Treatment of Prostatitis,'' 61(10) Am.
[[Page 35143]]
Family Physician 3015-22 (2000). As a result, the diagnoses contained
in DC 7527 are not consistent with non-bacterial prostatitis. In
addition, the symptoms caused by prostatitis--recurrent bladder
infections--are most similar to the diagnoses contained in DC 7525.
There is no change to the evaluation criteria for this DC.
VA also proposes to rename DC 7527 to include bladder outlet
obstruction, which has the same functional impairment and
symptomatology as the other conditions currently encompassed in this
code. Bladder outlet obstruction is not included in current DC 7517,
``Bladder, injury of,'' because this condition is not caused by an
injury to the bladder, but is generally caused by another condition,
such as benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), which is addressed in DC
7527. R. Dmochowski, ``Bladder Outlet Obstruction: Etiology and
Evaluation,'' 7(Supp. 6) Reviews in Urology S3-S13 (2005). In addition,
the symptomatology for this condition may include urinary tract
infections, rather than only voiding dysfunction, as contemplated by DC
7517. There is no change to the evaluation criteria for this DC.
VA proposes to add a note to DC 7533 to identify some of the most
common cystic kidney diseases seen in the veteran population, to
include polycystic disease, uremic medullary cystic disease, medullary
sponge kidney, and similar conditions such as hereditary nephritis,
Alport's syndrome, cystinosis, primary oxalosis, and Fabry's disease.
M. Bisceglia et al., ``Renal cystic diseases: a review,'' 13(1)
Advances in Anatomic Pathology 26-56 (2006). These diseases are being
added as a medical update and would ensure proper field application of
this DC. There is no change to the evaluation criteria for this DC.
Regarding DC 7534, which deals with atherosclerotic renal disease,
VA proposes to specifically identify another atherosclerotic renal
disease--large vessel disease, unspecified. Renal Failure: Diagnosis
and Treatment 65 (J. Gary Abuelo ed. 1995). This disease is being added
as a medical update and would ensure proper field application of this
DC. There is no change to the evaluation criteria.
Finally, VA proposes to amend DC 7537 to identify the most common
forms of interstitial nephritis resulting from the high prevalence of
the disease, including gouty nephropathy and disorders of calcium
metabolism. There is no change to the evaluation criteria.
E. DCs 7539 and 7541
VA proposes to move all conditions contained in DC 7541 to DC 7539,
with the exception of renal involvement in diabetes mellitus, to
encompass all systemic conditions that impact the kidneys. All of these
conditions are, as amyloid diseases, systemic diseases with renal
involvement and therefore are more appropriately evaluated under a
single DC. For clarity and ease of field application, VA proposes to
add a note to DC 7539 to identify all forms of glomerulonephritis,
nephritis, and renal vasculitis encountered with systemic diseases.
There is no change to the evaluation criteria.
As for renal involvement in diabetes mellitus (e.g., diabetic
nephropathy), VA proposes to continue rating this condition separately
under DC 7541. Although this condition would also be rated as renal
dysfunction, VA finds there is a need to track this particular
condition given its incidence and prevalence in the Veteran population,
especially with regard to claims related to Agent Orange exposure.
F. DC 7542
Based on modern clinical findings, neurogenic bladder should
continue to be rated as a voiding dysfunction. However, due to high
rate of urinary tract infections, VA proposes that this condition may
be rated as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract infection, whichever
is predominant. D. Sauerwein, ``Urinary tract infection in patients
with neurogenic bladder dysfunction,'' 19(6) Int'l J. of Antimicrobial
Agents 592-97 (2002).
G. New Proposed DC 7543
VA proposes the introduction of new DC 7543, ``Varicocele/
Hydrocele,'' to reflect related conditions of the urinary tract that
have not previously been recognized for disability evaluation purposes.
Varicocele is a dilatation of the veins along the cord that receives
blood from the testicles. Hydrocele is a collection of fluid in the
scrotum.
The medical community now recognizes that these conditions may be
associated with a decrease in fertility and, in rare instances, may be
associated with infertility. Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and
Vasectomy Reversal, ``Varicocele Repair,'' https://www.malereproduction.com/male-infertility/treatment/varicocele-repair.php (last accessed April 16, 2014). As a decrease in fertility,
or the existence of infertility, does not cause a reduction in earning
capacity, VA proposes to assign a 0 percent evaluation to these
conditions. In instances where there is a clinical finding of
infertility, these conditions may support eligibility for SMC due to
loss of use of a creative organ. Therefore, to best administer this
benefit, VA proposes a diagnostic code for these conditions that
provides a 0 percent evaluation. Section 4.115b's footnote directing
consideration of SMC would apply to DC 7543, consistent with the other
DCs in the VASRD addressing a creative organ.
H. New Proposed DC 7544
VA proposes the introduction of new DC 7544, ``Renal disease caused
by viral infection such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C,'' to
reflect renal dysfunctions associated with HIV and hepatitis because of
increasing prevalence and incidence of diseases caused by these
viruses. Perico Norberto et al., ``Hepatitis C Infection and Chronic
Renal Diseases,'' 4(1) Clinical J. Am. Soc'y of Nephrology 207-20
(2009). Hepatitis A, an acute liver disease, does not cause chronic
renal disease and is therefore not included in this DC.
VA proposes to evaluate this DC as renal dysfunction under Sec.
4.115a because, when the liver is damaged due to Hepatitis B or C
infection, the accumulation of toxins in the blood can damage the
kidneys, causing renal dysfunction. HIV-associated renal dysfunctions
have several different etiologies, but can include direct HIV infection
of the kidney, kidney damage caused by drugs used to treat HIV, and
fluid loss caused by various processes associated with the advanced
disease process. Moro O. Salifu, ``HIV-Associated Nephropathy,''
Medscape, https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/246031-overview (Vecihi
Batuman ed., 2013) (last accessed April 16, 2014).
I. New Proposed DC 7545
VA proposes the introduction of new DC 7545, ``Bladder,
diverticulum of.'' Currently, there is no DC for diverticulum of the
bladder and, as such, it is generally evaluated in the field as
analogous to fistula of the bladder. A bladder fistula is an abnormal
connection between the bladder and another organ of the body (e.g., the
bowel). A bladder diverticulum is an abnormal pouch or sac due to
weakness in the bladder's muscular wall that allows a portion of the
bladder to protrude. Urology Care Foundation, ``Urology A-Z: Bladder
Diverticulum,'' https://www.urologyhealth.org/urology/index.cfm?article=111 (last accessed April 16, 2014). The two
conditions have dissimilar symptomatology and result in dissimilar
functional impairment. A bladder fistula allows
[[Page 35144]]
urine to escape the confines of the bladder into another space such as
the rectum, or externally, causing urinary leakage. A bladder
diverticulum allows urine to remain in the bladder longer, often
resulting in infection as well as voiding dysfunction.
The proposed addition of this new DC would ensure that the
condition is more appropriately rated. VA proposes to rate DC 7545 as
voiding dysfunction or urinary tract infection, whichever is
predominant, because these criteria best capture the functional
impairment associated with this condition.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget, as ``any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy,
a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.''
VA has examined the economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and
policy implications of this regulatory action, and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866.
VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a copy of this rulemaking and its
impact analysis are available on VA's Web site at www.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for VA Regulations Published from FY 2004 Through
Fiscal Year to Date.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would directly affect only
individuals and would not directly affect any small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule would be
exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles affected by this document are 64.009, Veterans Medical Care
Benefits; 64.104, Pension for Non-Service-Connected Disability for
Veterans; 64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S.
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on May 26, 2017, for publication.
Dated: July 21, 2017.
Michael Shores,
Director, Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions, Veterans.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 4 as follows:
PART 4--SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart B--Disability Ratings
0
2. Revise Sec. 4.115 to read as follows:
Sec. 4.115 Co-Existence of renal and cardiovascular conditions.
Separate ratings are not to be assigned for disability from disease
of the heart and any form of renal disease, on account of the close
interrelationships of cardiovascular diseases. If, however, absence of
a kidney is the sole renal disability, even if removal was required
because of nephritis, the absent kidney and any hypertension or heart
disease will be separately rated. Also, in the event that chronic renal
disease has progressed to the point where regular dialysis is required,
any coexisting hypertension or heart disease will be separately rated.
0
3. Amend Sec. 4.115a by revising the introductory text and the table
entries regarding ``Renal dysfuntion'' and ``Urinary tract infection''
to read as follows:
Sec. 4.115a Ratings of the genitourinary system--dysfunctions.
Diseases of the genitourinary system generally result in
disabilities related to renal or voiding dysfunctions, infections, or a
combination of these. The following section provides descriptions of
various levels of disability in each of these symptom areas. Where
diagnostic codes refer the decision maker to these specific areas of
dysfunction, only the predominant area of dysfunction shall be
considered for rating purposes. Distinct disabilities may be evaluated
separately under this section, pursuant to Sec. 4.14, if the symptoms
do not overlap. Since the areas of dysfunction described below do not
cover all symptoms resulting from genitourinary diseases, specific
[[Page 35145]]
diagnoses may include a description of symptoms assigned to that
diagnosis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Renal dysfunction:
Chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration 100
rate (GFR) less than 16 mL/min; or requiring
regular, routine dialysis or kidney transplant.....
Chronic kidney disease with GFR 16 to 29 mL/min..... 80
Chronic kidney disease with GFR 30 to 59 mL/min..... 60
Chronic kidney disease with GFR >=60 mL/min with at
least one of the following:
Albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) >=2.5 g/gm
(nephrotic range proteinuria); or
Hypertension at least 10 percent disabling under 30
diagnostic code 7101...........................
Chronic kidney disease with GFR >=60 mL/min with at
least one of the following:
Albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) from 0.03 g/gm to
2.49 g/gm; or
Hypertension that is non-compensable under 0
diagnostic code 7101...........................
Note: GFR, estimated GFR (eGFR), and creatinine
based approximations of GFR will be accepted for
evaluation purposes under this section when
determined to be appropriate and calculated by a
medical professional.
* * * * * * *
Urinary tract infection:
Poor renal function: Rate as renal dysfunction.
Recurrent symptomatic infection requiring drainage 30
by stent or nephrostomy tube; or requiring greater
than 2 hospitalizations per year; or requiring
continuous intensive management....................
Recurrent symptomatic infection requiring 1-2 10
hospitalizations per year or suppressive drug
therapy lasting six months or longer...............
Recurrent symptomatic infection not requiring 0
hospitalization, but requiring suppressive drug
therapy for less than 6 months.....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
4. Amend Sec. 4.115b by:
0
a. Removing diagnostic code 7510.
0
b. Revising diagnostic codes 7508, 7520, 7521, 7522, 7524, 7525, 7527,
7533, 7534, 7537, 7539, 7541, and 7542.
0
c. Adding diagnostic codes 7543, 7544, and 7545.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 4.115b Ratings of the genitourinary system--diagnoses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
7508 Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis:
Rate as hydronephrosis, except for recurrent stone 30
formation requiring invasive or non-invasive
procedures more than two times/year................
* * * * * * *
7520 Penis, removal of half or more..................... \1\ 30
7521 Penis, removal of glans............................ \1\ 20
7522 Erectile dysfunction, with or without penile \1\ 0
deformity..............................................
Note: Peyronie's disease is not a ratable condition.
* * * * * * *
7524 Testis, removal:
Both................................................ \1\ 30
One................................................. \1\ 0
Note: In cases of the removal of one testis as the
result of a service-incurred injury or disease,
other than an undescended or congenitally
undeveloped testis, with the absence or
nonfunctioning of the other testis unrelated to
service, an evaluation of 30 percent will be
assigned for the service-connected testicular loss.
Testis, undescended, or congenitally undeveloped is
not a ratable disability.
7525 Prostatitis, urethritis, epididymitis, orchitis
(unilateral or bilateral), chronic only:
Rate as urinary tract infection.
For tubercular infections: Rate in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 4.88b or 4.89, whichever is
appropriate.
7527 Prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy,
postoperative residuals, bladder outlet obstruction:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract
infection, whichever is predominant.
* * * * * * *
7533 Cystic diseases of the kidneys:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
Note: Cystic diseases of the kidneys include, but
are not limited to, polycystic disease, uremic
medullary cystic disease, medullary sponge kidney,
and similar conditions such as hereditary
nephritis, Alport's syndrome, cystinosis, primary
oxalosis, and Fabry's disease.
7534 Atherosclerotic renal disease (renal artery
stenosis, atheroembolic renal disease, or large vessel
disease, unspecified):
Rate as renal dysfunction.
* * * * * * *
7537 Interstitial nephritis, including gouty
nephropathy, disorders of calcium metabolism:
[[Page 35146]]
Rate as renal dysfunction.
* * * * * * *
7539 Renal amyloid disease:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
Note: This diagnostic code pertains to renal
involvement in secondary glomerulonephritis/
vasculitis and in other systemic diseases, such as
Lupus erythematosus-Systemic lupus erythematosus
nephritis, Henoch-Schonlein syndrome, Scleroderma,
Hemolytic uremic syndrome, Polyarteritis, Wegener's
granulomatosis, other Vasculitis and its
derivatives, Goodpasture's syndrome, sickle cell
disease, and other secondary glomerulonephritis.
* * * * * * *
7541 Renal involvement in diabetes mellitus type I or
II:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
7542 Neurogenic bladder:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract
infection, whichever is predominant.
7543 Varicocele/Hydrocele............................... \1\ 0
7544 Renal disease caused by viral infection such as
HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C:
Rate as renal dysfunction.
7545 Bladder, diverticulum of:
Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract
infection, whichever is predominant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under Sec.
3.350 of this chapter.
0
5. Amend Appendix A to Part 4 by:
0
a. Adding Sec. 4.115.
0
b. Revising Sec. 4.115a.
0
c. In Sec. 4.115b, revising the entries for diagnostic codes 7508,
7510, 7520 through 7522, 7524, 7525, 7527, 7533, 7534, 7537, 7539,
7541, and 7542.
0
d. In Sec. 4.115b, adding diagnostic codes 7543 through 7545.
The additions and revisions to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 4--Table of Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
Section code No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
4.115......................................... .............. Retitled and revised [insert effective date of
final rule].
4.115a........................................ .............. Re-designated and revised as Sec. 4.115b; new
Sec. 4.115a ``Ratings of the genitourinary
system-dysfunctions'' added February 17, 1994;
revised [insert effective date of final rule].
4.115b........................................
* * * * * * *
7508 Evaluation February 17, 1994; title, criterion
[insert effective date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7510 Evaluation February 17, 1994; removed [insert
effective date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7520 Criterion February 17, 1994; criterion, footnote
[insert effective date of final rule].
7521 Criterion February 17, 1994; criterion, footnote
[insert effective date of final rule].
7522 Criterion September 8, 1994; title, criterion,
note [insert effective date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7524 Note July 6, 1950; evaluation February 17, 1994;
evaluation September 8, 1994; note [insert
effective date of final rule].
7525 Criterion March 11, 1969; evaluation February
17, 1994; title [insert effective date of final
rule].
* * * * * * *
7527 Criterion February 17, 1994; title [insert
effective date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7533 Added February 17, 1994; title and note [insert
effective date of final rule].
7534 Added February 17, 1994; title [insert effective
date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7537 Added February 17, 1994; title [insert effective
date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7539 Added February 17, 1994; note [insert effective
date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
7541 Added February 17, 1994; title [insert effective
date of final rule].
7542 Added February 17, 1994; criterion [insert
effective date of final rule].
[[Page 35147]]
7543 Added [insert effective date of final rule].
7544 Added [insert effective date of final rule].
7545 Added [insert effective date of final rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
6. Amend Appendix B to Part 4 by:
0
a. Revising diagnostic codes 7508, 7522, 7525, 7527, 7533, 7534, 7537,
and 7541.
0
b. Removing diagnostic code 7510;
0
c. Adding diagnostic codes 7543 through 7545.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 4--Numerical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Genitourinary System
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
7508.............................. Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/
Nephrocalcinosis.
* * * * * * *
7522.............................. Erectile dysfunction.
* * * * * * *
7525.............................. Prostatitis, urethritis,
epididymitis, orchitis (unilateral
or bilateral), chronic only.
7527.............................. Prostate gland injuries, infections,
hypertrophy, postoperative
residuals, bladder outlet
obstruction.
* * * * * * *
7533.............................. Cystic diseases of the kidneys.
7534.............................. Atherosclerotic renal disease (renal
artery stenosis, atheroembolic
renal disease, or large vessel
disease, unspecified).
* * * * * * *
7537.............................. Interstitial nephritis, including
gouty nephropathy, disorders of
calcium metabolism.
* * * * * * *
7541.............................. Renal involvement in diabetes
mellitus type I or II.
* * * * * * *
7543.............................. Varicocele/Hydrocele.
7544.............................. Renal disease caused by viral
infection such as HIV, Hepatitis B,
and Hepatitis C.
7545.............................. Bladder, diverticulum of.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
7. Amend Appendix C to Part 4 by:
0
a. Revising the entries for diagnostic codes 7508, 7522, 7525, 7527,
7533, 7537, and 7541.
0
b. Removing the reference to diagnostic code 7510;
0
c. Adding diagnostic codes 7543 through 7545.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 4--Alphabetical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Bladder:
* * * * * * *
Diverticulum of..................................... 7545
* * * * * * *
Erectile dysfunction.................................... 7522
* * * * * * *
Interstitial nephritis, including gouty nephropathy, 7537
disorders of calcium metabolism........................
* * * * * * *
Kidney:
[[Page 35148]]
* * * * * * *
Cystic diseases of the.............................. 7533
* * * * * * *
Nephrolithiasis/Ureterolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis....... 7508
* * * * * * *
Prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy, 7527
postoperative residuals, bladder outlet obstruction....
Prostatitis, urethritis, epididymitis, orchitis 7525
(unilateral or bilateral), chronic only................
* * * * * * *
Renal:
* * * * * * *
Disease caused by viral infection such as HIV, 7544
Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C.......................
* * * * * * *
Involvement in diabetes mellitus type I or II....... 7541
* * * * * * *
Varicocele/Hydrocele.................................... 7543
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-15765 Filed 7-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P