National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing; Flame Attenuation Lines, 34858-34861 [2017-14940]
Download as PDF
34858
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 17, 2017.
M.M. Balding,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, Captain
of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017–15879 Filed 7–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0706]
Security Zones; Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
Week Moving Vessels, 2017, Puget
Sound, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
Seattle’s Seafair Fleet Week Moving
Vessels security zones from 10 a.m. on
Aug 1, 2017, through 6 p.m. on August
7, 2017. These security zones are
necessary to help ensure the security of
the vessels from sabotage or other
subversive acts during Seafair Fleet
Week Parade of Ships. The designated
participating vessels are: HMCS
YELLOWKNIFE (MM 706), HMCS
EDMONTON (MM 703), and USCGC
MELLON (WHEC 717). During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the security
zones without the permission of the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Puget Sound
or her designated representative. The
COTP has granted general permission
for vessels to enter the outer 400 yards
of the security zones as long as those
vessels within the outer 400 yards of the
security zones operate at the minimum
speed necessary to maintain course
unless required to maintain speed by
the navigation rules.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.1333 will be enforced from 10 a.m.
on August 1, 2017, through 6 p.m. on
August 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email Petty Officer
Zachary Spence, Sector Puget Sound
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard; telephone 206–217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the security zones
for Seattle’s Seafair Fleet Week Moving
Vessels in 33 CFR 165.1333 from 10
a.m. on August 1, 2017, through 6 p.m.
on August 7, 2017.
In accordance with the general
regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Jul 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
D, no person or vessel may enter or
remain in the security zones without the
permission of the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or her designated
representative. For the purposes of this
rule, the following areas are security
zones: All navigable waters within 500
yards of HMCS YELLOWKNIFE (MM
706), HMCS EDMONTON (MM 703),
and USCGC MELLON (WHEC 717)
while each such vessel is in the Sector
Puget Sound COTP Zone.
The COTP has granted general
permission for vessels to enter the outer
400 yards of the security zones as long
as those vessels within the outer 400
yards of the security zones operate at
the minimum speed necessary to
maintain course unless required to
maintain speed by the navigation rules.
The COTP may be assisted by other
federal, state or local agencies with the
enforcement of the security zones.
All vessel operators who desire to
enter the inner 100 yards of the security
zones or transit the outer 400 yards at
greater than minimum speed necessary
to maintain course must obtain
permission from the COTP or her
designated representative by contacting
the on-scene patrol craft on VHF 13 or
Ch 16. Requests must include the reason
why movement within this area is
necessary. Vessel operators granted
permission to enter the security zones
will be escorted by the on-scene patrol
craft until they are outside of the
security zones.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under authority of 33 CFR 165.1333 and
5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this
notice of enforcement, the Coast Guard
will provide the maritime community
with advanced notification of the
security zones via the Local Notice to
Mariners and marine information
broadcasts on the day of the event. If the
COTP determines that the security
zones need not be enforced for the full
duration stated in this notice of
enforcement, he may use a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to grant general
permission to enter all portions of the
regulated areas.
Dated: July 17, 2017.
M.M. Balding,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, Captain
of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017–15880 Filed 7–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–1042; FRL–9964–89–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AT58
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wool
Fiberglass Manufacturing; Flame
Attenuation Lines
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to amend the national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants
for flame attenuation (FA) lines in the
wool fiberglass manufacturing industry.
This direct final rule provides affected
sources a 1-year extension to comply
with the emission limits for FA lines.
The EPA can provide sources up to 3
years to comply with emission limits in
the Clean Air Act (CAA) standards. FA
lines initially were given 2 years to
comply with the emission limits. This
action will extend the compliance date
to the maximum of 3 years while we
conduct our review. This compliance
date extension will enable the EPA to
conduct a review of the emission limits
for FA lines in light of recently
submitted corrected source emissions
data.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
25, 2017, without further notice, unless
the EPA receives significant adverse
comment by August 28, 2017, or if a
public hearing is requested, by August
3, 2017.
Public Hearing. If requested by
August 3, 2017, the EPA will hold a
public hearing to accept oral comments
on this action. EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register
announcing the date and location if a
public hearing is requested.
If the EPA receives significant adverse
comment, or if a public hearing is
requested, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2010–1042, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
To request a hearing, to register to
speak at a hearing, or to inquire if a
hearing will be held, please contact
Aimee St. Clair at (919) 541–1063 or by
email at stclair.aimee@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243–04), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
1103; fax number: (919) 541–5450; and
email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Organization of This Document. The
information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments made by this
direct final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Jul 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
C. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final
rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and do not
anticipate significant adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of this Federal Register, we are
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposed rule to amend
the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wool
Fiberglass Manufacturing, if the EPA
receives significant adverse comments
on this direct final rule. We will not
institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For
further information about commenting
on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section
of this document.
If the EPA receives significant adverse
comment on all or a distinct portion of
this direct final rule, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that some
or all of this direct final rule will not
take effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. In any
subsequent final rule, the EPA will
examine whether there is ‘‘good cause,’’
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), to designate
the publication date of the final rule
(based on our parallel proposal) as the
effective date for implementation of the
final rule.
B. Does this direct final rule apply to
me?
Categories and entities potentially
regulated by this direct final rule
include:
NAICS code 1
Category
Wool fiberglass manufacturing facilities ...................
1 North
System.
American
Industry
327993
Classification
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this direct final rule. To
determine whether your facility is
affected, you should examine the
applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.1380.
If you have questions regarding the
applicability of any aspect of this action
to a particular entity, consult either the
air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as
listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34859
Do not submit information containing
CBI to the EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information on a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comments that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comments that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver
information identified as CBI only to the
following address: OAQPS Document
Control Officer (C404–02), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2010–1042.
II. What are the amendments made by
this direct final rule?
Under the rule published in 2015 (80
FR 45280, July 29, 2015), the owner or
operator of an FA line subject to the
emission limits for formaldehyde,
phenol, and methanol in Table 2 to 40
CFR part 63, subpart NNN, must
demonstrate compliance with the limits
by July 31, 2017. This compliance date
is 2 years after promulgation of the
amended limits. We note that CAA
section 112 allows sources up to 3 years
to comply with emission standards.
With this action, we are extending the
compliance date for certain emission
limitations by another year so the EPA
can review the emission limitations to
address two recent issues that have
come to our attention.
First, in March 2017, Johns-Manville,
a company that manufactures wool
fiberglass using the FA process, notified
the EPA that the data they collected in
2011 for the Wool Fiberglass Residual
Risk and Technology Review (RTR)
contained errors in the methodology
and, ultimately, the final stack test
emissions results submitted to the EPA.
These data were used by the EPA in the
development of the current emission
limits for formaldehyde, methanol, and
phenol emitted from the bonding and
curing processes on FA lines. JohnsManville representatives stated that they
did not realize at the time of the 2011
test submittal that the methodology was
in error, and it went undiscovered until
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
34860
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
2017, when the laboratory that
conducted the emissions testing
informed the company of the error.
Johns-Manville notified the EPA of the
errors, and, with the testing contractor,
corrected the errors and provided
revised test results along with newly
collected test data for the FA lines.
Second, Johns-Manville informed the
EPA that some of their FA lines
manufacture a product by extruding
extremely thin glass fibers at a very low
pull rate through a fiber forming
process. This process is also subject to
the FA line limits, which are expressed
in pounds of pollutant per ton of glass
pulled. Johns-Manville asked the EPA to
consider alternative emission limits for
such processes which would be
equivalent to the pounds per ton limits,
but would be expressed as a
concentration (pounds of pollutant per
dry standard cubic foot) or as hourly
production (pounds of pollutant per
hour).
The EPA is reviewing the new and
corrected data submitted by JohnsManville, and will determine at a later
date what, if any, actions are
appropriate. We plan to propose any
actions we believe are appropriate along
with the technology review proposed
rulemaking for the rotary spin lines,
which is expected to be promulgated in
December 2017. During the extension to
the compliance date, the EPA will
review the corrected emission test data
as well as the new test data collected on
low-pull FA lines. Only the compliance
date for FA lines is affected by this
action, and no changes to the emission
limits, operating limits, monitoring
requirements, or other requirements are
being made at this time.
In any subsequent final rule, if
necessary, the EPA intends to examine
whether there is ‘‘good cause,’’ under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), to designate the
publication date of the final rule (based
on our parallel proposal) as the effective
date for implementation of the final
rule.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Jul 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA. OMB has previously approved the
information collection activities
contained in the existing regulation (40
CFR part 63, subpart NNN) and has
assigned OMB control number 2060–
0114. This action does not change the
information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action does not create any
new requirements or burdens and no
costs are associated with this direct final
action.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. There are no wool
fiberglass facilities located on tribal
lands. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying to those regulatory
actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that the EPA has
reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations, and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 6, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency is amending title 40, chapter I,
part 63 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) as follows:
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart NNN—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
2. Table 2 to Subpart NNN of part 63
is amended by revising entry 12 to read
as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
34861
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART NNN OF PART 63—EMISSIONS LIMITS AND COMPLIANCE DATES
If your source is a:
And you commenced construction:
Your emission limits are: 1
And you must
comply by: 2
*
*
12. Flame-attenuation line manufacturing
any product.
*
*
On or before November 25, 2011 ...........
*
*
1.4 lb phenol per ton of glass pulled ......
5.6 lb formaldehyde per ton of glass
pulled.
0.50 lb methanol per ton of glass pulled
*
July 31, 2018.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1 The
numeric limits do not apply during startup and shutdown.
sources must demonstrate compliance by the compliance dates specified in this table. New sources have 180 days after the applicable compliance date to demonstrate compliance.
2 Existing
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
water systems, laboratories, and
primacy agencies with more timely
access to new measurement techniques
and greater flexibility in the selection of
analytical methods, thereby reducing
monitoring costs while maintaining
public health protection.
40 CFR Part 141
DATES:
[EPA–HQ–OW–2017–0284; FRL–9964–78–
OW]
ADDRESSES:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–14940 Filed 7–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
2017.
Expedited Approval of Alternative Test
Procedures for the Analysis of
Contaminants Under the Safe Drinking
Water Act; Analysis and Sampling
Procedures
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action announces the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA’s) approval of alternative testing
methods for use in measuring the levels
of contaminants in drinking water and
determining compliance with national
primary drinking water regulations. The
Safe Drinking Water Act authorizes EPA
to approve the use of alternative testing
methods through publication in the
Federal Register. EPA is using this
streamlined authority to make 17
additional methods available for
analyzing drinking water samples. This
expedited approach provides public
SUMMARY:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OW–2017–0284. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov.
The
Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800) 426–
4791 or Glynda Smith, Technical
Support Center, Standards and Risk
Management Division, Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water (MS 140),
Environmental Protection Agency, 26
West Martin Luther King Drive,
Cincinnati, OH 45268; telephone
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Category
State, local, & tribal governments.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Industry .....................................
Municipalities ............................
1 North
This action is effective July 27,
number: (513) 569–7652; email address:
smith.glynda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Public water systems are the regulated
entities required to measure
contaminants in drinking water
samples. In addition, EPA Regions as
well as states and tribal governments
with authority to administer the
regulatory program for public water
systems under the Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA) may measure contaminants
in water samples. When EPA sets a
monitoring requirement in its national
primary drinking water regulations for a
given contaminant, the agency also
establishes (in the regulations)
standardized test procedures for
analysis of the contaminant. This action
makes alternative testing methods
available for particular drinking water
contaminants beyond the testing
methods currently established in the
regulations. EPA is providing public
water systems, required to test water
samples, with a choice of using either a
test procedure already established in the
existing regulations or an alternative
testing method that has been approved
in this action or in prior expedited
approval actions. Categories and entities
that may ultimately be affected by this
action include:
NAICS 1
Examples of potentially regulated entities
State, local and tribal governments that analyze water samples on behalf of public water systems required to conduct such analysis; state, local and tribal governments that directly operate community and non-transient non-community water systems required to monitor.
Private operators of community and non-transient non-community water systems required to
monitor.
Municipal operators of community and non-transient non-community water systems required
to monitor.
924110
221310
924110
American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Jul 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
for readers regarding entities likely to be
interested in this action. This table lists
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the types of entities that EPA is now
aware could potentially be affected by
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 143 (Thursday, July 27, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34858-34861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14940]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042; FRL-9964-89-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT58
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wool
Fiberglass Manufacturing; Flame Attenuation Lines
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to amend the national emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants for flame attenuation (FA) lines in the wool fiberglass
manufacturing industry. This direct final rule provides affected
sources a 1-year extension to comply with the emission limits for FA
lines. The EPA can provide sources up to 3 years to comply with
emission limits in the Clean Air Act (CAA) standards. FA lines
initially were given 2 years to comply with the emission limits. This
action will extend the compliance date to the maximum of 3 years while
we conduct our review. This compliance date extension will enable the
EPA to conduct a review of the emission limits for FA lines in light of
recently submitted corrected source emissions data.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 25, 2017, without further
notice, unless the EPA receives significant adverse comment by August
28, 2017, or if a public hearing is requested, by August 3, 2017.
Public Hearing. If requested by August 3, 2017, the EPA will hold a
public hearing to accept oral comments on this action. EPA will publish
a document in the Federal Register announcing the date and location if
a public hearing is requested.
If the EPA receives significant adverse comment, or if a public
hearing is requested, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2010-1042, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
[[Page 34859]]
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
To request a hearing, to register to speak at a hearing, or to
inquire if a hearing will be held, please contact Aimee St. Clair at
(919) 541-1063 or by email at stclair.aimee@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1103; fax
number: (919) 541-5450; and email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Organization of This Document. The information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and do
not anticipate significant adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed
Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate
document that will serve as the proposed rule to amend the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wool Fiberglass
Manufacturing, if the EPA receives significant adverse comments on this
direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
If the EPA receives significant adverse comment on all or a
distinct portion of this direct final rule, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that some or
all of this direct final rule will not take effect. We would address
all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed
rule. In any subsequent final rule, the EPA will examine whether there
is ``good cause,'' under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), to designate the
publication date of the final rule (based on our parallel proposal) as
the effective date for implementation of the final rule.
B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
Categories and entities potentially regulated by this direct final
rule include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category NAICS code \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wool fiberglass manufacturing facilities................ 327993
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
direct final rule. To determine whether your facility is affected, you
should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.1380. If you
have questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of this action
to a particular entity, consult either the air permitting authority for
the entity or your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR
63.13.
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
Do not submit information containing CBI to the EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comments that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comments that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver information
identified as CBI only to the following address: OAQPS Document Control
Officer (C404-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2010-1042.
II. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?
Under the rule published in 2015 (80 FR 45280, July 29, 2015), the
owner or operator of an FA line subject to the emission limits for
formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol in Table 2 to 40 CFR part 63,
subpart NNN, must demonstrate compliance with the limits by July 31,
2017. This compliance date is 2 years after promulgation of the amended
limits. We note that CAA section 112 allows sources up to 3 years to
comply with emission standards. With this action, we are extending the
compliance date for certain emission limitations by another year so the
EPA can review the emission limitations to address two recent issues
that have come to our attention.
First, in March 2017, Johns-Manville, a company that manufactures
wool fiberglass using the FA process, notified the EPA that the data
they collected in 2011 for the Wool Fiberglass Residual Risk and
Technology Review (RTR) contained errors in the methodology and,
ultimately, the final stack test emissions results submitted to the
EPA. These data were used by the EPA in the development of the current
emission limits for formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol emitted from the
bonding and curing processes on FA lines. Johns-Manville
representatives stated that they did not realize at the time of the
2011 test submittal that the methodology was in error, and it went
undiscovered until
[[Page 34860]]
2017, when the laboratory that conducted the emissions testing informed
the company of the error. Johns-Manville notified the EPA of the
errors, and, with the testing contractor, corrected the errors and
provided revised test results along with newly collected test data for
the FA lines.
Second, Johns-Manville informed the EPA that some of their FA lines
manufacture a product by extruding extremely thin glass fibers at a
very low pull rate through a fiber forming process. This process is
also subject to the FA line limits, which are expressed in pounds of
pollutant per ton of glass pulled. Johns-Manville asked the EPA to
consider alternative emission limits for such processes which would be
equivalent to the pounds per ton limits, but would be expressed as a
concentration (pounds of pollutant per dry standard cubic foot) or as
hourly production (pounds of pollutant per hour).
The EPA is reviewing the new and corrected data submitted by Johns-
Manville, and will determine at a later date what, if any, actions are
appropriate. We plan to propose any actions we believe are appropriate
along with the technology review proposed rulemaking for the rotary
spin lines, which is expected to be promulgated in December 2017.
During the extension to the compliance date, the EPA will review the
corrected emission test data as well as the new test data collected on
low-pull FA lines. Only the compliance date for FA lines is affected by
this action, and no changes to the emission limits, operating limits,
monitoring requirements, or other requirements are being made at this
time.
In any subsequent final rule, if necessary, the EPA intends to
examine whether there is ``good cause,'' under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), to
designate the publication date of the final rule (based on our parallel
proposal) as the effective date for implementation of the final rule.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulation (40 CFR part 63,
subpart NNN) and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0114. This action
does not change the information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
does not create any new requirements or burdens and no costs are
associated with this direct final action.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. There are no wool fiberglass facilities located
on tribal lands. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of protection provided to human
health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 6, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency is amending title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) as follows:
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart NNN--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
0
2. Table 2 to Subpart NNN of part 63 is amended by revising entry 12 to
read as follows:
[[Page 34861]]
Table 2 to Subpart NNN of Part 63--Emissions Limits and Compliance Dates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And you commenced Your emission limits are: And you must
If your source is a: construction: \1\ comply by: \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
12. Flame-attenuation line On or before November 25, 1.4 lb phenol per ton of July 31, 2018.
manufacturing any product. 2011. glass pulled.
5.6 lb formaldehyde per
ton of glass pulled.
0.50 lb methanol per ton
of glass pulled.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The numeric limits do not apply during startup and shutdown.
\2\ Existing sources must demonstrate compliance by the compliance dates specified in this table. New sources
have 180 days after the applicable compliance date to demonstrate compliance.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-14940 Filed 7-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P