Safety Zone; Kosciuszko Bridge Approach Spans Demolition, Newtown Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, NY, 34612-34614 [2017-15694]
Download as PDF
34612
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Section 51.6302–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 6302(a).
Par. 2. Section 51.2 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 51.2
Explanation of terms.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) Controlled group. The term
controlled group means a group of two
or more persons, including at least one
person that is a covered entity, that is
treated as a single employer under
section 52(a), 52(b), 414(m), or 414(o).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 51.2T
[Removed]
Par. 3. Section 51.2T is removed.
■ Par. 4. Section 51.11 is amended by
revising the section heading and
paragraph (b) and removing paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
■
§ 51.11
Applicability date.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Section 51.2(e)(3) applies on and
after July 24, 2017.
§ 51.11T
■
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zones unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port New York or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from July 26, 2017 through
December 31, 2017. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from July 22, 2017 through July 26,
2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0486 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Sector New York
Waterways Management Division;
telephone 718–354–4195, email
jeff.m.yunker@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FDNY New York City Fire Department
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NYSDOT New York State Department of
Transportation
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
[Removed]
Par. 5. Section 51.11T is removed.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: July 17, 2017.
Tom West,
Tax Legislative Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017–15643 Filed 7–24–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0486]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Kosciuszko Bridge
Approach Spans Demolition, Newtown
Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of Newtown Creek,
NY within 2,000 feet of the existing
Kosciuszko Bridge at mile 2.1. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on these navigable waters
during the explosives demolition of the
approach spans on each adjacent
shoreline. This rulemaking prohibits
pmangrum on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:33 Jul 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard issued a Bridge
Permit dated August 21, 2013 approving
the location and construction of the
Kosciuszko Bridge across Newtown
Creek, mile 2.1, between the Boroughs
of Queens and Brooklyn, NY. On April
25, 2017, NYSDOT notified the Coast
Guard that the contractor requires a
short term closure of Newtown Creek for
the energetic felling of the existing
Kosciuszko Bridge approach spans over
land using shaped charges. The shaped
charges make multiple precise cuts in
the steel bridge spans at the same
instant. This allows the approach spans
to fall directly to the ground below.
There will be no debris field outside of
the limits of the bridge. The tentative,
primary demolition dates are the early
morning hours of July 22 or 23, 2017.
The tentative back-up dates for these
operations are the early morning hours
of July 29 or 30, August 5 or 6, and
August 12 or 13, 2017. To ensure public
safety the contractor requested the
USCG establish a safety zone within
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
600-feet of the existing bridge for a
three-hour duration during these
operations. NYSDOT stated FDNY was
working with the explosives demolition
subcontractor and would provide a final
exclusion zone limit during these
operations in early May 2017.
On May 15, 2017 the contractor
notified the Coast Guard that the
distance requested for the exclusion
zone is 1,200 from the existing bridge
during the explosives demolition.
However, the subcontractor stated this
is a preliminary distance for discussion
purposes only. The final distance would
not be provided until the contract is
awarded and the subcontractor meets
with NYSDOT, the general contractor,
security forces, and other stakeholders.
Due to this expanded distance and late
notification the Coast Guard was unable
to include this request within the
existing bridge demolition rulemaking
(Docket Number USCG–2016–1048) for
this bridge replacement project. The
safety zone distance is to ensure that
persons are not exposed to air
overpressure (noise) levels above the
140 decibel impact guidelines under
OSHA regulations codified at 29 CFR
1910.95 Table G–16—PERMISSIBLE
NOISE EXPOSURES, Footnote 1. The
Coast Guard proposes to make this rule
enforceable through December 31, 2017,
and to a greater distance (2,000 feet)
than currently requested (1,200 feet), as
a contingency for any unforeseen delays
or revisions to the bridge approach
spans demolition schedule or safety
requirements based upon the final
FDNY safety requirements.
The Coast Guard is making this
temporary rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(d)).
This provision authorizes an agency to
make a rule effective less than 30 days
after publication for good cause. We are
issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making it effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register because waiting 30
days would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. It is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to provide a full 30-days notice
because this rule must be effective on
July 22 or 23, 2017 to limit delays to
NYSDOT and contractor schedules as
part of this $555 million dollar
infrastructure improvement project.
FDNY requires the contractor to conduct
the explosives demolition in the early
morning hours on a weekend to reduce
the impact to vehicle traffic on the
bridge. This time frame is also expected
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
to reduce the impact on vessel traffic in
Newtown Creek. If this rule is not made
effective by this date, then it would
inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability to
perform its statutory mission to ensure
the safety of the maritime public.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
COTP has determined that potential
hazards associated with these
operations will be a safety concern for
anyone within up to 2,000-feet of the
existing approach spans to the
Kosciuszko Bridge at mile 2.1 over
Newtown Creek. The purpose of this
rule is to ensure the safety of
individuals on the navigable waters
within up to 2,000 feet of the approach
spans of the existing Kosciuszko Bridge
before, during, and after the explosive
demolition operations.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from July 22 through December 31,
2017. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters of Newtown Creek
within up to 2,000 feet of the existing
approach spans to the Kosciuszko
Bridge at mile 2.1 over Newtown Creek
during the explosive demolition
operations. The duration of the zone is
intended to ensure the safety of
individuals and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the explosive
demolition operations tentatively
scheduled for the early morning hours
on July 22 or 23, 2017. Backup dates for
these operations are July 29 or 30,
August 5 or 6, and August 12 or 13,
2017.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
pmangrum on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:33 Jul 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. Although
vessel traffic will not be able to safely
transit around this safety zone,
enforcement of the safety zone will be
limited in duration. The boundaries of
the safety zone will be limited to the
length upstream, and downstream, from
the bridge as determined by FDNY for
the explosives detonation to remain in
compliance with existing OSHA
Permissible Noise Exposure regulations.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the zone
and the rule allows vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34613
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
34614
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting approximately three hours
that will prohibit entry within a
maximum of 2,000 feet of the existing
approach spans to the Kosciuszko
Bridge. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A Record of Environmental
Consideration (REC) for Categorically
Excluded Actions is available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
pmangrum on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with RULES
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:33 Jul 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0486 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0486 Safety Zone; Kosciuszko
Bridge Approach Spans Demolition,
Newtown Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters from surface to
bottom of Newtown Creek within 2,000
feet of the existing approach spans to
the Kosciuszko Bridge at mile 2.1,
between a line drawn from the
following approximate positions:
40°43′46.7″ N., 073°56′10.5″ W. to
40°43′44.3″ N., 073°56′11.6″ W and from
40°43′22.9″ N., 073°55′29.0″ W. to
40°43′20.3″ N., 073°55′36.0″ W.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative. A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the COTP to act on
his or her behalf. A designated
representative may be on an official
patrol vessel or may be on shore and
will communicate with vessels via
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official patrol vessels. Official
patrol vessels may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement periods. (1) This
safety zone is effective from July 22,
2017 to December 31, 2017 but will only
be enforced when active approach span
demolition operations are in progress.
(2) The Coast Guard will rely on
marine broadcasts and local notice to
mariners to notify the public of the time
and duration that the safety zone will be
enforced. Violations of this safety zone
may be reported to the COTP at 718–
354–4353 or on VHF-Channel 16.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23,
as well as the following regulations,
apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all
persons and vessels must comply with
all orders and directions from the COTP
or a COTP’s designated representative.
(3) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
Dated: June 22, 2017.
Michael H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2017–15694 Filed 7–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 26, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34612-34614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15694]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0486]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Kosciuszko Bridge Approach Spans Demolition, Newtown
Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Newtown Creek, NY within 2,000 feet of the existing
Kosciuszko Bridge at mile 2.1. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable waters during the explosives
demolition of the approach spans on each adjacent shoreline. This
rulemaking prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zones
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port New York or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 26, 2017
through December 31, 2017. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from July 22, 2017 through July 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0486 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Sector New York Waterways Management
Division; telephone 718-354-4195, email jeff.m.yunker@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FDNY New York City Fire Department
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NYSDOT New York State Department of Transportation
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard issued a Bridge Permit dated August 21, 2013
approving the location and construction of the Kosciuszko Bridge across
Newtown Creek, mile 2.1, between the Boroughs of Queens and Brooklyn,
NY. On April 25, 2017, NYSDOT notified the Coast Guard that the
contractor requires a short term closure of Newtown Creek for the
energetic felling of the existing Kosciuszko Bridge approach spans over
land using shaped charges. The shaped charges make multiple precise
cuts in the steel bridge spans at the same instant. This allows the
approach spans to fall directly to the ground below. There will be no
debris field outside of the limits of the bridge. The tentative,
primary demolition dates are the early morning hours of July 22 or 23,
2017. The tentative back-up dates for these operations are the early
morning hours of July 29 or 30, August 5 or 6, and August 12 or 13,
2017. To ensure public safety the contractor requested the USCG
establish a safety zone within 600-feet of the existing bridge for a
three-hour duration during these operations. NYSDOT stated FDNY was
working with the explosives demolition subcontractor and would provide
a final exclusion zone limit during these operations in early May 2017.
On May 15, 2017 the contractor notified the Coast Guard that the
distance requested for the exclusion zone is 1,200 from the existing
bridge during the explosives demolition. However, the subcontractor
stated this is a preliminary distance for discussion purposes only. The
final distance would not be provided until the contract is awarded and
the subcontractor meets with NYSDOT, the general contractor, security
forces, and other stakeholders. Due to this expanded distance and late
notification the Coast Guard was unable to include this request within
the existing bridge demolition rulemaking (Docket Number USCG-2016-
1048) for this bridge replacement project. The safety zone distance is
to ensure that persons are not exposed to air overpressure (noise)
levels above the 140 decibel impact guidelines under OSHA regulations
codified at 29 CFR 1910.95 Table G-16--PERMISSIBLE NOISE EXPOSURES,
Footnote 1. The Coast Guard proposes to make this rule enforceable
through December 31, 2017, and to a greater distance (2,000 feet) than
currently requested (1,200 feet), as a contingency for any unforeseen
delays or revisions to the bridge approach spans demolition schedule or
safety requirements based upon the final FDNY safety requirements.
The Coast Guard is making this temporary rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register pursuant to authority
under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(d)). This provision authorizes an agency to make a rule effective
less than 30 days after publication for good cause. We are issuing this
rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making it effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because waiting 30 days would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. It is impracticable
and contrary to the public interest to provide a full 30-days notice
because this rule must be effective on July 22 or 23, 2017 to limit
delays to NYSDOT and contractor schedules as part of this $555 million
dollar infrastructure improvement project. FDNY requires the contractor
to conduct the explosives demolition in the early morning hours on a
weekend to reduce the impact to vehicle traffic on the bridge. This
time frame is also expected
[[Page 34613]]
to reduce the impact on vessel traffic in Newtown Creek. If this rule
is not made effective by this date, then it would inhibit the Coast
Guard's ability to perform its statutory mission to ensure the safety
of the maritime public.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with
these operations will be a safety concern for anyone within up to
2,000-feet of the existing approach spans to the Kosciuszko Bridge at
mile 2.1 over Newtown Creek. The purpose of this rule is to ensure the
safety of individuals on the navigable waters within up to 2,000 feet
of the approach spans of the existing Kosciuszko Bridge before, during,
and after the explosive demolition operations.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from July 22 through December
31, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of Newtown
Creek within up to 2,000 feet of the existing approach spans to the
Kosciuszko Bridge at mile 2.1 over Newtown Creek during the explosive
demolition operations. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure
the safety of individuals and these navigable waters before, during,
and after the explosive demolition operations tentatively scheduled for
the early morning hours on July 22 or 23, 2017. Backup dates for these
operations are July 29 or 30, August 5 or 6, and August 12 or 13, 2017.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Although vessel traffic will
not be able to safely transit around this safety zone, enforcement of
the safety zone will be limited in duration. The boundaries of the
safety zone will be limited to the length upstream, and downstream,
from the bridge as determined by FDNY for the explosives detonation to
remain in compliance with existing OSHA Permissible Noise Exposure
regulations. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule
allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this
action is one of a
[[Page 34614]]
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting approximately three hours that will prohibit entry
within a maximum of 2,000 feet of the existing approach spans to the
Kosciuszko Bridge. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) for Categorically Excluded
Actions is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0486 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0486 Safety Zone; Kosciuszko Bridge Approach Spans
Demolition, Newtown Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters from
surface to bottom of Newtown Creek within 2,000 feet of the existing
approach spans to the Kosciuszko Bridge at mile 2.1, between a line
drawn from the following approximate positions: 40[deg]43'46.7'' N.,
073[deg]56'10.5'' W. to 40[deg]43'44.3'' N., 073[deg]56'11.6'' W and
from 40[deg]43'22.9'' N., 073[deg]55'29.0'' W. to 40[deg]43'20.3'' N.,
073[deg]55'36.0'' W.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the COTP to act on his or her
behalf. A designated representative may be on an official patrol vessel
or may be on shore and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio
or loudhailer. In addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official patrol vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement periods. (1) This safety zone is effective from
July 22, 2017 to December 31, 2017 but will only be enforced when
active approach span demolition operations are in progress.
(2) The Coast Guard will rely on marine broadcasts and local notice
to mariners to notify the public of the time and duration that the
safety zone will be enforced. Violations of this safety zone may be
reported to the COTP at 718-354-4353 or on VHF-Channel 16.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.23, as well as the following regulations, apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all persons and vessels must
comply with all orders and directions from the COTP or a COTP's
designated representative.
(3) During periods of enforcement, upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the
operator of the vessel must proceed as directed.
Dated: June 22, 2017.
Michael H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2017-15694 Filed 7-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P