Civil Money Penalty Definitions; Technical Amendment, 34402 [2017-15532]

Download as PDF 34402 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FDA–2017–N–0011] Civil Money Penalty Definitions; Technical Amendment AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule; technical amendment. ACTION: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is amending a civil money penalty regulation to correct a statutory reference to align the regulations with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) and to ensure accuracy and clarity in the Agency’s regulations. DATES: This rule is effective July 25, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jarilyn Dupont, Office of Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4248, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–4830. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is amending its regulation at 21 CFR 17.3 to correct a statutory reference to reflect the current citation. FDA is revising § 17.3(a)(1) through (4) by replacing section ‘‘333(g)’’ with section ‘‘333(f).’’ On July 27, 1995, FDA published a final rule establishing hearing procedures for use when FDA proposes the imposition of administrative civil money penalties (60 FR 38612 at 38626). The document was published with a citation to 21 U.S.C. 333(g) (303(g) of the FD&C Act) that subsequently was changed to 21 U.S.C. 333(f) (303(f) of the FD&C Act) by section 226(b)(1) of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–85). Publication of this document constitutes final action on the change under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). This technical amendment is nonsubstantive and merely updates and corrects a statutory reference in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that is no longer current. FDA therefore, for good cause, has determined that notice and public comment are unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). Further, this rule places no burden on affected parties for which such parties would need a reasonable time to prepare for the effective date of the rule. Accordingly, FDA, for good cause, has determined asabaliauskas on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Jul 24, 2017 Jkt 241001 this technical amendment to be exempt under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and that the rule can become effective upon publication. FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(i) that this final rule is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. In addition, FDA has determined that this final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 20) is not required. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 17 Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 17 is amended as follows: PART 17—CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES HEARINGS 1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331, 333, 337, 351, 352, 355, 360, 360c, 360f, 360i, 360j, 371; 42 U.S.C. 262, 263b, 300aa–28; 5 U.S.C. 554, 555, 556, 557. 2. In § 17.3, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows: ■ § 17.3 Definitions. * * * * * (a) For specific acts giving rise to civil money penalty actions brought under 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1): (1) Significant departure, for the purpose of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(i), means a departure from requirements that is either a single major incident or a series of incidents that collectively are consequential. (2) Knowing departure, for the purposes of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(i), means a departure from a requirement taken: (i) With actual knowledge that the action is such a departure; or (ii) In deliberate ignorance of a requirement; or (ii) In reckless disregard of a requirement. (3) Minor violations, for the purposes of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(ii), means departures from requirements that do not rise to a level of a single major incident or a series of incidents that are collectively consequential. (4) Defective, for the purposes of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(iii), PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 includes any defect in performance, manufacture, construction, components, materials, specifications, design, installation, maintenance, or service of a device, or any defect in mechanical, physical, or chemical properties of a device. * * * * * Dated: July 18, 2017. Anna K. Abram, Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis. [FR Doc. 2017–15532 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR National Indian Gaming Commission 25 CFR Part 515 RIN 3141–AA65 Privacy Act Procedures; Corrections National Indian Gaming Commission, Department of Interior. ACTION: Correcting amendments. AGENCY: On January 24, 2017, the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) revised its Privacy Act regulations. That document included incorrect information regarding the NIGC’s address and contained conflicting timelines for resolving appeals. This document corrects the final regulations. DATES: Effective July 25, 2017 and applicable beginning January 24, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Mendoza, Staff Attorney, (202) 632–7003. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or the Act), Public Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law October 17, 1988. The Act established the NIGC and set out a comprehensive framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. The purposes of the Act include: Providing a statutory basis for the operation of gaming by Indian tribes as a means of promoting tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal governments; ensuring that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation; and declaring that the establishment of independent federal regulatory authority for gaming on Indian lands, the establishment of federal standards for gaming on Indian lands, and the establishment of a National Indian E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15532]



[[Page 34402]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 17

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-0011]


Civil Money Penalty Definitions; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is amending a 
civil money penalty regulation to correct a statutory reference to 
align the regulations with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(the FD&C Act) and to ensure accuracy and clarity in the Agency's 
regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective July 25, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jarilyn Dupont, Office of Policy, Food 
and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4248, 
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-4830.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is amending its regulation at 21 CFR 
17.3 to correct a statutory reference to reflect the current citation. 
FDA is revising Sec.  17.3(a)(1) through (4) by replacing section 
``333(g)'' with section ``333(f).'' On July 27, 1995, FDA published a 
final rule establishing hearing procedures for use when FDA proposes 
the imposition of administrative civil money penalties (60 FR 38612 at 
38626). The document was published with a citation to 21 U.S.C. 333(g) 
(303(g) of the FD&C Act) that subsequently was changed to 21 U.S.C. 
333(f) (303(f) of the FD&C Act) by section 226(b)(1) of the Food and 
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-85).
    Publication of this document constitutes final action on the change 
under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). This technical 
amendment is nonsubstantive and merely updates and corrects a statutory 
reference in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that is no longer 
current. FDA therefore, for good cause, has determined that notice and 
public comment are unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). Further, 
this rule places no burden on affected parties for which such parties 
would need a reasonable time to prepare for the effective date of the 
rule. Accordingly, FDA, for good cause, has determined this technical 
amendment to be exempt under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and that the rule can 
become effective upon publication.
    FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(i) that this final rule is of 
a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. In 
addition, FDA has determined that this final rule contains no 
collections of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of 
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501-20) is not required.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 17

    Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
17 is amended as follows:

PART 17--CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES HEARINGS

0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331, 333, 337, 351, 352, 355, 360, 360c, 
360f, 360i, 360j, 371; 42 U.S.C. 262, 263b, 300aa-28; 5 U.S.C. 554, 
555, 556, 557.


0
2. In Sec.  17.3, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  17.3  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (a) For specific acts giving rise to civil money penalty actions 
brought under 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1):
    (1) Significant departure, for the purpose of interpreting 21 
U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(i), means a departure from requirements that is 
either a single major incident or a series of incidents that 
collectively are consequential.
    (2) Knowing departure, for the purposes of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 
333(f)(1)(B)(i), means a departure from a requirement taken:
    (i) With actual knowledge that the action is such a departure; or
    (ii) In deliberate ignorance of a requirement; or
    (ii) In reckless disregard of a requirement.
    (3) Minor violations, for the purposes of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 
333(f)(1)(B)(ii), means departures from requirements that do not rise 
to a level of a single major incident or a series of incidents that are 
collectively consequential.
    (4) Defective, for the purposes of interpreting 21 U.S.C. 
333(f)(1)(B)(iii), includes any defect in performance, manufacture, 
construction, components, materials, specifications, design, 
installation, maintenance, or service of a device, or any defect in 
mechanical, physical, or chemical properties of a device.
* * * * *

    Dated: July 18, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-15532 Filed 7-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.