Drawbridge Operation Regulation; St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior Harbor), Between the Towns of Duluth, MN and Superior, WI, 33802-33803 [2017-15371]
Download as PDF
33802
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Katia Kroutil,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2017–15373 Filed 7–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Coast Guard
On April 19, 2017, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled, Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; St. Louis River (DuluthSuperior Harbor), between the towns of
Duluth, MN and Superior, WI, in the
Federal Register (82 FR 18407). We did
not receive any comments on this
proposed rule.
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0212]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; St.
Louis River (Duluth-Superior Harbor),
Between the Towns of Duluth, MN and
Superior, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is modifying
the regulations that govern the
drawbridges over the St. Louis River at
Duluth-Superior Harbor. This waterway
borders Minnesota and Wisconsin and
is listed under Minnesota as St. Louis
River (Duluth-Superior Harbor) and
under Wisconsin as Duluth-Superior
Harbor (St. Louis River) in the CFR. This
rule affects both regulations. The owner
of the Burlington Northern Grassy Point
Railroad Bridge at mile 5.44 requested
the regulation be updated to include
permanent winter operating schedule.
This rule also aligns river mile numbers
with the United States Coast Pilot and
deletes bridges from the regulations that
were removed from the waterway and
makes the regulation easier to read and
less confusing to the mariner.
DATES: This rule is effective August 21,
2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type [USCG–
2017–0212]. In the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and
click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District; telephone 216–902–
6085, email Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LWD Low Water Datum
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Jul 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 499.
The current regulations for St. Louis
River drawbridges (33 CFR 117.669 and
33 CFR 117.1083) includes the operating
schedules for the Burlington Northern
Grassy Point Railroad Bridge at mile
5.44, the Grassy Point Bridge at mile 8.0,
the Arrow Head Bridge at mile 8.7, and
the Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range
combined Railroad and Highway Bridge,
also known as the Oliver Bridge, at mile
13.91.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard provided a 30 day
comment period in the Federal Register
and solicited comments through the
Ninth Coast Guard Local Notice to
Mariners for the same 30 days and we
did not receive any comments.
Title 33 of the Code of Regulations
part 117 lists drawbridge regulations by
state. The St. Louis River is the border
between Minnesota (listed under 33
CFR 117.669) and Wisconsin (listed
under 33 CFR 117.1083). The St. Louis
River is listed by state separately under
both sections of the CFR. This rule will
revise 33 CFR 117.1083 (under
Wisconsin) to direct readers to 33 CFR
117.669 (under Minnesota) to simplify
the rule and make it easier to reference
by mariners.
The Coast Guard is modifying the
operating schedule of the The
Burlington Northern Grassy Point
Railroad Bridge at mile 5.44 to include
authorized permanent winter hours.
Mariners will still be able to request
bridge openings with 12-hours advance
notice during times of light traffic
volume on the river due to ice formation
that typically prevents most vessel
navigation in the channel from
December 15 through March 15 each
year.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The bridges listed in the regulations
as the Grassy Point Bridge at mile 8.0
and the Arrow Head Bridge at mile 8.7,
respectively, have been removed from
the waterway and will be removed from
the regulations.
The Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range
combined Railroad and Highway Bridge,
also known as the Oliver Bridge, at mile
13.91, will be renamed the Canadian
National Combined Railroad and
Highway Bridge to reflect the current
owner and use. The authorization to
remain in the closed position will
continue as before, but the drawbridge
must return to operable condition when
notified by the District Commander to
do so.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still transit the bridge given advanced
notice during the winter when ice
typically prevents vessels from
transiting the waterway and vessel
traffic is at its lowest. This rule will also
align river mile numbers with the
United States Coast Pilot and delete
bridges from the regulations that have
been removed from the waterway and
make the regulation easier to read and
less confusing to the mariner.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard did not receive any
comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. While some
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit the bridge may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this final rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator because
the bridge will open with advance
notice.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Jul 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This action is categorically
excluded from further review, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration and a
Memorandum for the Record are not
required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33803
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 117.669 to read as follows:
§ 117.669
Harbor).
St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior
(a) The draw of the Burlington
Northern Grassy Point railroad Bridge,
mile 5.44, shall open on signal except
that, from December 15 through March
15 the draw shall open if at least 12hour notice is given.
(b) The draw of the Canadian National
Combined Railroad and Highway
Bridge, mile 13.91, need not be opened
for the passage of vessels. The owner
shall return the draw to operable
condition within a reasonable time
when notified by the District
Commander to do so.
3. Revise § 117.1083 to read as
follows:
■
§ 117.1083 Duluth-Superior Harbor (St.
Louis River).
See § 117.669 St. Louis River (DuluthSuperior Harbor), listed under
Minnesota.
Dated: June 15, 2017.
N.A. Bartolotta,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2017–15371 Filed 7–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0594]
Safety Zone; Upper Ohio Valley Italian
Heritage Festival/Upper Ohio Valley
Italian Heritage Festival Fireworks,
Wheeling, WV
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a safety zone for the Upper Ohio Valley
Italian Heritage Festival/Upper Ohio
Valley Italian Heritage Festival
Fireworks on the Ohio River mile 90.0
to 90.5. The safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of life and to
protect vessels from the hazards
associated with the ‘‘Upper Ohio Valley
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33802-33803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15371]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2017-0212]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior
Harbor), Between the Towns of Duluth, MN and Superior, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is modifying the regulations that govern the
drawbridges over the St. Louis River at Duluth-Superior Harbor. This
waterway borders Minnesota and Wisconsin and is listed under Minnesota
as St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior Harbor) and under Wisconsin as
Duluth-Superior Harbor (St. Louis River) in the CFR. This rule affects
both regulations. The owner of the Burlington Northern Grassy Point
Railroad Bridge at mile 5.44 requested the regulation be updated to
include permanent winter operating schedule. This rule also aligns
river mile numbers with the United States Coast Pilot and deletes
bridges from the regulations that were removed from the waterway and
makes the regulation easier to read and less confusing to the mariner.
DATES: This rule is effective August 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type [USCG-
2017-0212]. In the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management Specialist, Ninth
Coast Guard District; telephone 216-902-6085, email
Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LWD Low Water Datum
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On April 19, 2017, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled, Drawbridge Operation Regulation; St. Louis River
(Duluth-Superior Harbor), between the towns of Duluth, MN and Superior,
WI, in the Federal Register (82 FR 18407). We did not receive any
comments on this proposed rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority of 33
U.S.C. 499. The current regulations for St. Louis River drawbridges (33
CFR 117.669 and 33 CFR 117.1083) includes the operating schedules for
the Burlington Northern Grassy Point Railroad Bridge at mile 5.44, the
Grassy Point Bridge at mile 8.0, the Arrow Head Bridge at mile 8.7, and
the Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range combined Railroad and Highway Bridge,
also known as the Oliver Bridge, at mile 13.91.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard provided a 30 day comment period in the Federal
Register and solicited comments through the Ninth Coast Guard Local
Notice to Mariners for the same 30 days and we did not receive any
comments.
Title 33 of the Code of Regulations part 117 lists drawbridge
regulations by state. The St. Louis River is the border between
Minnesota (listed under 33 CFR 117.669) and Wisconsin (listed under 33
CFR 117.1083). The St. Louis River is listed by state separately under
both sections of the CFR. This rule will revise 33 CFR 117.1083 (under
Wisconsin) to direct readers to 33 CFR 117.669 (under Minnesota) to
simplify the rule and make it easier to reference by mariners.
The Coast Guard is modifying the operating schedule of the The
Burlington Northern Grassy Point Railroad Bridge at mile 5.44 to
include authorized permanent winter hours. Mariners will still be able
to request bridge openings with 12-hours advance notice during times of
light traffic volume on the river due to ice formation that typically
prevents most vessel navigation in the channel from December 15 through
March 15 each year.
The bridges listed in the regulations as the Grassy Point Bridge at
mile 8.0 and the Arrow Head Bridge at mile 8.7, respectively, have been
removed from the waterway and will be removed from the regulations.
The Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range combined Railroad and Highway
Bridge, also known as the Oliver Bridge, at mile 13.91, will be renamed
the Canadian National Combined Railroad and Highway Bridge to reflect
the current owner and use. The authorization to remain in the closed
position will continue as before, but the drawbridge must return to
operable condition when notified by the District Commander to do so.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice during the
winter when ice typically prevents vessels from transiting the waterway
and vessel traffic is at its lowest. This rule will also align river
mile numbers with the United States Coast Pilot and delete bridges from
the regulations that have been removed from the waterway and make the
regulation easier to read and less confusing to the mariner.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
[[Page 33803]]
operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard did
not receive any comments from the Small Business Administration on this
rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section IV.A above this final rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator because the bridge will
open with advance notice.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a
Memorandum for the Record are not required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.669 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.669 St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior Harbor).
(a) The draw of the Burlington Northern Grassy Point railroad
Bridge, mile 5.44, shall open on signal except that, from December 15
through March 15 the draw shall open if at least 12-hour notice is
given.
(b) The draw of the Canadian National Combined Railroad and Highway
Bridge, mile 13.91, need not be opened for the passage of vessels. The
owner shall return the draw to operable condition within a reasonable
time when notified by the District Commander to do so.
0
3. Revise Sec. 117.1083 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.1083 Duluth-Superior Harbor (St. Louis River).
See Sec. 117.669 St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior Harbor), listed
under Minnesota.
Dated: June 15, 2017.
N.A. Bartolotta,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District,
Acting.
[FR Doc. 2017-15371 Filed 7-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P