Petition for Partial Reconsideration, or in the Alternative, Suspension of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding, 33856 [2017-15302]

Download as PDF 33856 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules decline to comply with the demand, citing United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). A written response may be offered to a request, or to a demand, if permitted by the court or other competent authority. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS § 51–11.14 Fees. (a) Generally. The General Counsel may condition the production of records or appearance for testimony upon advance payment of a reasonable estimate of the costs to the Committee. (b) Fees for records. Fees for producing records will include fees for searching, reviewing, and duplicating records, costs of attorney time spent in reviewing the demand or request, and expenses generated by materials and equipment used to search for, produce, and copy the responsive information. Costs for employee time will be calculated on the basis of the hourly pay of the employee (including all pay, allowance, and benefits). Fees for duplication will be the same as those charged by the Committee in its Freedom of Information Act regulations at 41 CFR part 51–8. (c) Witness fees. Fees for attendance by a witness will include fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court’s rules. If no such fees are prescribed, witness fees will be determined based upon the rule of the Federal district court closest to the location where the witness will appear. Such fees will include cost of time spent by the witness to prepare for testimony, travel time and expenses, and for attendance in the legal proceeding. (d) Payment of fees. Witness fees for current Committee employees and any records certification fees shall be paid by check or money order presented to the Committee made payable to the United States Department of Treasury. Applicable fees for former Committee employees’ testimony must be paid directly to the former employee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1821 or other applicable statutes. (e) Certification (authentication) of copies of records. The Committee Records Manager may certify that records are true copies in order to facilitate their use as evidence. Certification requests require 45 calendar days for processing and a fee of $15.00 for each document certified. (f) Waiver or reduction of fees. The General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may, upon a showing of reasonable cause, waive or reduce any fees in connection with the testimony, production, or certification of records. (g) De minimis fees. Fees will not be assessed if the total charge would be $10.00 or less. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Jul 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 § 51–11.15 Penalties. (a) An employee who discloses official records or information or gives testimony relating to official information, except as expressly authorized by the Committee, or as ordered by a Federal court after the Committee has had the opportunity to be heard, may face the penalties provided in 18 U.S.C. 641 and other applicable laws. Additionally, former Committee employees are subject to the restrictions and penalties of 18 U.S.C. 207 and 216. (b) A current Committee employee who testifies or produces official records and information in violation of this part may be subject to disciplinary action. Patricia Briscoe, Deputy Director, Business Operations Pricing and Information Management. [FR Doc. 2017–15357 Filed 7–20–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [CG Docket Nos. 10–51 and 03–123; DA 17– 656] Petition for Partial Reconsideration, or in the Alternative, Suspension of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Petition for partial reconsideration or suspension. AGENCY: A Petition for Partial Reconsideration, or in the Alternative Suspension of Compliance Deadline (Petition), has been filed in the Commission’s rulemaking proceeding by Sorenson Communications, LLC. DATES: Comments to the Petition must be filed on or before August 7, 2017. Reply Comments must be filed on or before July 31, 2017. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliot Greenwald, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, email: Eliot.Greenwald@fcc.gov; phone: (202) 418–2235. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s document DA 17–656, released July 7, 2017. The full text of the Petition is available for viewing and copying at the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–A257, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Washington, DC 20554 or may be accessed online via the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System at: https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/105302 18217172/2017-05-30%20Sorenson%20 Petition%20for%20Reconsideration %20re%20RUE%20Profile.pdf. The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office Pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. because no rules are being adopted by the Commission. Subject: Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program; Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order, DA 17– 76, published at 82 FR 19322, April 27, 2017, in CG Docket Nos. 10–51 and 03– 123. This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g). Number of Petitions Filed: 1. Federal Communications Commission. Karen Peltz Strauss, Deputy Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau. [FR Doc. 2017–15302 Filed 7–20–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [CC Docket No. 91–281; FCC 17–76] Calling Number Identification Service—Caller ID Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: In this document, the Commission proposes to amend its Caller ID rules to allow carriers to disclose blocked Caller ID information in the limited case of threatening calls as an aid to law enforcement investigations. Media and law enforcement reports indicate that the number of threatening calls targeting schools, religious organizations, and other entities appears to be increasing dramatically. In many cases, the perpetrators block the Caller ID information, making it difficult to trace the threatening calls. The Commission’s current rules require that carriers not reveal blocked Caller ID information or use that information to allow the called party to contact the caller. Recognizing that threatening callers do not have a legitimate privacy interest in having SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM 21JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 33856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15302]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CG Docket Nos. 10-51 and 03-123; DA 17-656]


Petition for Partial Reconsideration, or in the Alternative, 
Suspension of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for partial reconsideration or suspension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A Petition for Partial Reconsideration, or in the Alternative 
Suspension of Compliance Deadline (Petition), has been filed in the 
Commission's rulemaking proceeding by Sorenson Communications, LLC.

DATES: Comments to the Petition must be filed on or before August 7, 
2017. Reply Comments must be filed on or before July 31, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliot Greenwald, Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau, email: Eliot.Greenwald@fcc.gov; phone: 
(202) 418-2235.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document DA 17-656, released July 7, 2017. The full text of the 
Petition is available for viewing and copying at the FCC Reference 
Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 
20554 or may be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic Comment 
Filing System at: https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10530218217172/2017-05-30%20Sorenson%20Petition%20for%20Reconsideration%20re%20RUE%20Profile.pdf. The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) 
submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office Pursuant 
to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. because no rules are being adopted by the 
Commission.
    Subject: Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service 
Program; Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech 
Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report 
and Order, DA 17-76, published at 82 FR 19322, April 27, 2017, in CG 
Docket Nos. 10-51 and 03-123. This document is being published pursuant 
to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.

Karen Peltz Strauss,
Deputy Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2017-15302 Filed 7-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.