Air Plan Approval; ME; Consumer Products Alternative Control Plan, 33014-33016 [2017-15048]
Download as PDF
33014
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED MAINE REGULATIONS
State citation
Title/subject
State effective
date
EPA approval date EPA approval date and citation 1
Explanations
*
Chapter 119 ...................
*
Motor Vehicle Fuel
Volatility Limit.
*
7/15/2015
*
*
7/19/2017 [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
Requires the sale of federal RFG year round
and removes the 7.8 RVP requirement during
the period of May 1 through September 15 in
7 southern counties.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–15049 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0023; A–1–FRL–
9965–10–Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; ME; Consumer
Products Alternative Control Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Maine Department of
Environmental Protection (Maine DEP).
The SIP revision consists of an
Alternative Control Plan (ACP) for the
control of volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions from Reckitt
Benckiser’s Air Wick Air Freshener
Single Phase Aerosol Spray, issued
pursuant to Maine’s consumer products
rule. This action is being taken in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective September 18, 2017, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
August 18, 2017. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2017–0023 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jul 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the ‘‘FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT’’ section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, tel. 617–918–
1584, email Mackintosh.David@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Description and Evaluation of the State’s
Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
Maine’s Chapter 152, ‘‘Control of
Emissions of Volatile Organic
Compounds from Consumer Products’’
(Chapter 152) became effective in the
State of Maine on September 1, 2004
and was approved by EPA into the
Maine SIP on October 24, 2005 (70 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61382). Maine subsequently amended
this rule. The current amended version
of the rule became effective in the State
of Maine on December 15, 2007 and was
approved by EPA into the Maine SIP on
May 22, 2012 (77 FR 30216). Chapter
152 contains VOC content limits for the
manufacture and sale of various
consumer products in the state of
Maine. Chapter 152 also provides for
state and EPA approval of ACPs by
allowing the responsible party the
option of voluntarily applying for such
agreements.
On March 30, 2012, the Maine DEP
received an ACP application from
Reckitt Benckiser LLC (Reckitt) for
Reckitt’s Air Wick Air Freshener SinglePhase Aerosol Spray pursuant to
Chapter 152. The Maine DEP approved
the Reckitt ACP effective April 23, 2013
and on the same day sent EPA the ACP
for approval into the Maine SIP.
II. Description and Evaluation of the
State’s Submittal
Reckitt manufactures Air Wick Air
Freshener Single-Phase Aerosol Spray
(Product), which is offered for retail sale
and wholesale distribution in the State
of Maine. The Product contains 4.6%
VOCs by weight. The Chapter 152
regulatory content limit for single-phase
aerosol air freshener is 30% VOCs by
weight. Reckitt’s ACP generates VOC
credits, expressed in pounds of VOCs,
based on the difference between the
Product VOC content and regulatory
VOC limit for each unit sold in the State
of Maine. Credits generated are subject
to the conditions in the ACP Approval.
Reckitt shall monitor Maine sales of the
Product and each calendar quarter shall
provide to the Maine DEP accurate
records and documentation as a basis
for compliance reporting. Only sales in
the State of Maine that are substantiated
by accurate documentation shall be
used in the calculation of VOC
emissions and emission reductions
(surplus reductions). The resulting
surplus reduction credits shall be
discounted by 5% prior to the issuance
E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM
19JYR1
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
of the surplus emission reduction
certificates by the Maine DEP. Reckitt
must maintain a minimum of three
years of detailed transactional data,
traceable to invoice levels. Maine DEP
shall issue surplus reduction certificates
which establish and quantify to the
nearest pound of VOC reduced, surplus
reductions achieved by Reckitt
operating under the ACP.
Surplus reduction certificates shall
not constitute instruments, securities, or
any other form of property. The
issuance, use and trading of all surplus
reductions shall be subject to the
conditions within the ACP. Any surplus
reductions issued by Maine DEP may be
used by Reckitt until the reductions
expire, are traded to another responsible
party operating under a SIP-approved
ACP, or until the ACP is canceled. A
valid surplus reduction shall be in effect
starting five days after the date of
issuance by the Maine DEP, for a
continuous period of one year at the end
of which period the surplus reduction
shall then expire. Surplus reductions
cannot be applied retroactively to any
compliance period prior to the
compliance period in which the
reductions were generated. While valid,
surplus reductions certificates can only
be used in the State of Maine to:
(1) Adjust either the Consumer
Product ACP emissions of either Reckitt
or another ACP responsible party to
which the reductions were traded,
provided the surplus reductions are not
to be used by any ACP responsible party
to lower its ACP emissions when its
ACP emissions are equal to or less than
the ACP limit during the applicable
compliance period; or
(2) be traded for the purpose of
reconciling another approved Consumer
Product ACP responsible party’s
shortfalls.
EPA has reviewed the ACP and has
determined that it is approvable. Reckitt
must still, at a minimum, comply with
the VOC content limits in Maine’s SIPapproved Chapter 152. However, to the
extent that the company documents, as
outlined in the ACP, the sales of
Product in Maine with a VOC content
below these limits, the Maine DEP will
issue VOC emission reduction credits
that may be used in the future. Since to
date, this is the first and only Consumer
Product ACP submitted by the State of
Maine for SIP approval, reduction
certificates generated may only be held
for future use until they expire (i.e., for
one year). Certificates generated may
only be used after a second Consumer
Product ACP is submitted by Maine,
and approved by EPA, into the Maine
SIP. Thus, this SIP revision meets the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jul 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
33015
anti-back sliding requirements of
Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
III. Final Action
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
EPA is approving, and incorporating
into the Maine SIP, an ACP for Reckitt
Benckiser’s Air Wick Air Freshener
Single Phase Aerosol Spray.
The EPA is publishing this action
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should relevant adverse comments be
filed.
This rule will be effective September
18, 2017 without further notice unless
the Agency receives relevant adverse
comments by August 18, 2017.
If the EPA receives such comments,
then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on
the proposed rule. All parties interested
in commenting on the proposed rule
should do so at this time. If no such
comments are received, the public is
advised that this rule will be effective
on September 18, 2017 and no further
action will be taken on the proposed
rule. Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if
that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
alternative control plan issued by the
Maine DEP to Reckitt described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov, and/or at the EPA
Region 1 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM
19JYR1
33016
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804,
however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of
particular applicability; rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and
rules of agency organization, procedure,
or practice that do not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because
this is a rule of particular applicability,
EPA is not required to submit a rule
report regarding this action under
section 801.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 18,
2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register, rather
than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule,
so that EPA can withdraw this direct
final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 5, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U—Maine
2. In § 52.1020(d), the table is
amended by adding an entry for
‘‘Reckitt Benckiser’s Air Wick Air
Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray’’
at the end of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MAINE SOURCE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Name of source
Permit number
*
*
Reckitt Benckiser’s Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray.
State effective
date
*
Alternative Control
Plan.
*
4/23/2013
EPA approval
date 2
*
7/19/2017 [Insert
Federal Register citation].
Explanations
*
*
Issued pursuant to Chapter 152 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds
from Consumer Products.
2 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
updates, corrections and minor edits.
EPA does not anticipate any adverse
comments.
[FR Doc. 2017–15048 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
48 CFR Parts 1501, 1504, 1509, 1515,
1516, 1517, 1519, 1535, 1552 and 1553
[EPA–HQ–OARM–2017–0126; FRL 9960–62–
OARM]
Administrative Amendments to
Environmental Protection Agency
Acquisition Regulation
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is issuing a final rule to
amend the Environmental Protection
Agency Acquisition Regulation
(EPAAR) to make administrative
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Jul 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
This rule is effective on
September 18, 2017 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by August 18, 2017. If EPA
receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OARM–2017–0126, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
DATES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julianne Odend’hal, Office of
Acquisition Management (Mail Code
3802R), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM
19JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33014-33016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15048]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0023; A-1-FRL-9965-10-Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; ME; Consumer Products Alternative Control Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Maine Department of
Environmental Protection (Maine DEP). The SIP revision consists of an
Alternative Control Plan (ACP) for the control of volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air
Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray, issued pursuant to Maine's
consumer products rule. This action is being taken in accordance with
the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 18, 2017,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 18, 2017. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2017-0023 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05-2),
Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. 617-918-1584, email
Mackintosh.David@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Description and Evaluation of the State's Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
Maine's Chapter 152, ``Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic
Compounds from Consumer Products'' (Chapter 152) became effective in
the State of Maine on September 1, 2004 and was approved by EPA into
the Maine SIP on October 24, 2005 (70 FR 61382). Maine subsequently
amended this rule. The current amended version of the rule became
effective in the State of Maine on December 15, 2007 and was approved
by EPA into the Maine SIP on May 22, 2012 (77 FR 30216). Chapter 152
contains VOC content limits for the manufacture and sale of various
consumer products in the state of Maine. Chapter 152 also provides for
state and EPA approval of ACPs by allowing the responsible party the
option of voluntarily applying for such agreements.
On March 30, 2012, the Maine DEP received an ACP application from
Reckitt Benckiser LLC (Reckitt) for Reckitt's Air Wick Air Freshener
Single-Phase Aerosol Spray pursuant to Chapter 152. The Maine DEP
approved the Reckitt ACP effective April 23, 2013 and on the same day
sent EPA the ACP for approval into the Maine SIP.
II. Description and Evaluation of the State's Submittal
Reckitt manufactures Air Wick Air Freshener Single-Phase Aerosol
Spray (Product), which is offered for retail sale and wholesale
distribution in the State of Maine. The Product contains 4.6% VOCs by
weight. The Chapter 152 regulatory content limit for single-phase
aerosol air freshener is 30% VOCs by weight. Reckitt's ACP generates
VOC credits, expressed in pounds of VOCs, based on the difference
between the Product VOC content and regulatory VOC limit for each unit
sold in the State of Maine. Credits generated are subject to the
conditions in the ACP Approval. Reckitt shall monitor Maine sales of
the Product and each calendar quarter shall provide to the Maine DEP
accurate records and documentation as a basis for compliance reporting.
Only sales in the State of Maine that are substantiated by accurate
documentation shall be used in the calculation of VOC emissions and
emission reductions (surplus reductions). The resulting surplus
reduction credits shall be discounted by 5% prior to the issuance
[[Page 33015]]
of the surplus emission reduction certificates by the Maine DEP.
Reckitt must maintain a minimum of three years of detailed
transactional data, traceable to invoice levels. Maine DEP shall issue
surplus reduction certificates which establish and quantify to the
nearest pound of VOC reduced, surplus reductions achieved by Reckitt
operating under the ACP.
Surplus reduction certificates shall not constitute instruments,
securities, or any other form of property. The issuance, use and
trading of all surplus reductions shall be subject to the conditions
within the ACP. Any surplus reductions issued by Maine DEP may be used
by Reckitt until the reductions expire, are traded to another
responsible party operating under a SIP-approved ACP, or until the ACP
is canceled. A valid surplus reduction shall be in effect starting five
days after the date of issuance by the Maine DEP, for a continuous
period of one year at the end of which period the surplus reduction
shall then expire. Surplus reductions cannot be applied retroactively
to any compliance period prior to the compliance period in which the
reductions were generated. While valid, surplus reductions certificates
can only be used in the State of Maine to:
(1) Adjust either the Consumer Product ACP emissions of either
Reckitt or another ACP responsible party to which the reductions were
traded, provided the surplus reductions are not to be used by any ACP
responsible party to lower its ACP emissions when its ACP emissions are
equal to or less than the ACP limit during the applicable compliance
period; or
(2) be traded for the purpose of reconciling another approved
Consumer Product ACP responsible party's shortfalls.
EPA has reviewed the ACP and has determined that it is approvable.
Reckitt must still, at a minimum, comply with the VOC content limits in
Maine's SIP-approved Chapter 152. However, to the extent that the
company documents, as outlined in the ACP, the sales of Product in
Maine with a VOC content below these limits, the Maine DEP will issue
VOC emission reduction credits that may be used in the future. Since to
date, this is the first and only Consumer Product ACP submitted by the
State of Maine for SIP approval, reduction certificates generated may
only be held for future use until they expire (i.e., for one year).
Certificates generated may only be used after a second Consumer Product
ACP is submitted by Maine, and approved by EPA, into the Maine SIP.
Thus, this SIP revision meets the anti-back sliding requirements of
Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving, and incorporating into the Maine SIP, an ACP for
Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
relevant adverse comments be filed.
This rule will be effective September 18, 2017 without further
notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by August
18, 2017.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. All parties
interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this
time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on September 18, 2017 and no further action will
be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
alternative control plan issued by the Maine DEP to Reckitt described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made,
and will continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov, and/or at the EPA Region 1 Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have
[[Page 33016]]
tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules
relating to agency management or personnel; and rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3).
Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 18, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 5, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U--Maine
0
2. In Sec. 52.1020(d), the table is amended by adding an entry for
``Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol
Spray'' at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved Maine Source Specific Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective EPA approval date
Name of source Permit number date \2\ Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Alternative 4/23/2013 7/19/2017 [Insert Issued pursuant to
Air Freshener Single Phase Control Plan. Federal Register Chapter 152 Control
Aerosol Spray. citation]. of Volatile Organic
Compounds from
Consumer Products.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the
Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
[FR Doc. 2017-15048 Filed 7-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P