Transactions Involving the Transfer of No Net Value, 32281-32282 [2017-14723]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
circumstances expected to arise from
these conditions. Emergency employees
must report to work at their regular
worksite or another approved location
as directed by the agency, unless—
(1) The agency determines that travel
to or performing work at the worksite is
unsafe for emergency employees, in
which case the agency may require the
employees to work at another location,
including a telework site as provided in
paragraph (a) of this section, as
appropriate; or
(2) The agency determines that
circumstances justify granting leave
under this subpart to emergency
employees.
§ 630.1606 Administration of weather and
safety leave.
(a) An agency must use the same
minimum charge increments for
weather and safety leave as it does for
annual and sick leave under § 630.206.
(b) Employees may be granted
weather and safety leave only for hours
within the tour of duty established for
purposes of charging annual and sick
leave when absent. For full-time
employees, that tour is the 40-hour basic
workweek as defined in 5 CFR 610.102,
the basic work requirement established
for employees on a flexible or
compressed work schedule as defined in
5 U.S.C. 6121(3), or an uncommon tour
of duty under § 630.210.
(c) Employees may not receive
weather and safety leave for hours
during which they are on other
preapproved leave (paid or unpaid) or
paid time off. Agencies should not
approve weather and safety leave for an
employee who, in the agency’s
judgment, is cancelling preapproved
leave or paid time off, or changing a
regular day off in a flexible or
compressed work schedule, for the
primary purpose of obtaining weather
and safety leave.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 630.1607
Records and reporting.
(a) Record of placement on leave. An
agency must maintain an accurate
record of the placement of an employee
on weather and safety leave.
(b) Reporting. In agency data systems
(including timekeeping systems) and in
data reports submitted to OPM, an
agency must record weather and safety
leave under § 6329c and this subpart as
a category of leave separate from other
types of leave.
[FR Doc. 2017–14712 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–139633–08]
RIN 1545–BI18
Transactions Involving the Transfer of
No Net Value
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Partial withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document withdraws the
remaining part of a notice of proposed
rulemaking containing proposed
regulations that would have required an
exchange or distribution of net value for
certain corporate formations and
reorganizations to qualify for
nonrecognition treatment under the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). Other
parts of the notice of proposed
rulemaking were previously adopted as
final regulations. The proposed
regulations being withdrawn also
addressed the treatment of certain
distributions not qualifying for tax-free
treatment under section 332 of the Code.
The proposed regulations being
withdrawn would have affected
corporations and their shareholders.
DATES: As of July 13, 2017, the proposed
revisions to § 1.332–2(b) and (e); the
proposed addition of Example 2 to
§ 1.332–2(e); the proposed additions of
§ 1.351–1(a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv); the
proposed addition of Example 4 to
§ 1.351–1(a)(2); the proposed
amendments to § 1.368–1(a) and (b); the
proposed addition of § 1.368–1(f); and
the proposed revision to § 1.368–2(d)(1)
in the notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–163314–03) that was published in
the Federal Register (70 FR 11903) on
March 10, 2005 are withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
Broderick at (202) 317–6848 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On March 10, 2005, the Department of
the Treasury (the Treasury Department)
and the IRS published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–163314–03)
in the Federal Register (70 FR 11903)
containing proposed regulations under
sections 332, 351, and 368 (2005
Proposed Regulations). The 2005
Proposed Regulations generally would
have provided that the non-recognition
rules in subchapter C of chapter 1 of
subtitle 1 of the Code do not apply
unless there is an exchange (or, in the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32281
case of section 332, a distribution) of net
value (the net value requirement). The
2005 Proposed Regulations also
provided that section 332 would apply
only if the recipient corporation
receives some payment for each class of
stock it owns in the liquidating
corporation. Finally, the 2005 Proposed
Regulations provided guidance on the
circumstances in which (and the extent
to which) creditors of a corporation are
treated as proprietors of the corporation
in determining whether continuity of
interest is preserved in a potential
reorganization (Creditor Continuity of
Interest).
On December 12, 2008, the Treasury
Department and the IRS adopted the
Creditor Continuity of Interest
provisions of the 2005 Proposed
Regulations as final regulations (TD
9434) published in the Federal Register
(73 FR 75566). Minor portions of the
2005 Proposed Regulations that
reflected statutory changes to sections
332 and 351 were adopted as final
regulations as part of a Treasury
decision adopting final regulations
under sections 334(b)(1)(B) and
362(e)(1) (TD 9759), published in the
Federal Register (81 FR 17066) on
March 28, 2016. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have decided to
withdraw the remainder of the 2005
Proposed Regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are of the view that current law is
sufficient to ensure that the
reorganization provisions and section
351 are used to accomplish
readjustments of continuing interests in
property held in modified corporate
form. With respect to section 332, the
holdings of H.K. Porter Co. v.
Commissioner, 87 T.C. 689 (1986),
Spaulding Bakeries Inc. v.
Commissioner, 27 T.C. 684 (1957), aff’d,
252 F.2d 293 (2d Cir., 1958), H.G. Hill
Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner, 44 B.T.A.
1182 (1941), Rev. Rul. 2003–125, 2003–
2 C.B. 1243, Rev. Rul. 68–602, 1968–2
C.B. 135, Rev. Rul. 68–359, 1968–2 C.B.
161, and Rev. Rul. 59–296, 1959–2 C.B.
87, continue to reflect the position of
the Treasury Department and the IRS.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this
withdrawal notice is Jean Broderick of
the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate). However, other personnel
from the Treasury Department and the
IRS participated in its development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
32282
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Partial Withdrawal of Proposed
Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of
26 U.S.C. 7805, the Treasury
Department and the IRS withdraw the
proposed revisions to § 1.332–2(b) and
(e); the proposed addition of Example 2
to § 1.332–2(e); the proposed additions
of § 1.351–1(a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv); the
proposed addition of Example 4 to
§ 1.351–1(a)(2); the proposed
amendments to § 1.368–1(a) and (b); the
proposed addition of § 1.368–1(f); and
the proposed revision to § 1.368–2(d)(1)
in the notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–163314–03) that was published in
the Federal Register (70 FR 11903) on
March 10, 2005.
Kirsten B. Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner of Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2017–14723 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0617; FRL–9964–72–
Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Utah; General Burning Rule Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
I. General Information
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by Utah on January
28, 2013, and July 8, 2015. In the letter
accompanying the rule revisions sent to
the EPA on July 8, 2015, the Governor
stated that no further action is necessary
on the January 28, 2013 submittal since
it has been superseded. Upon
consultation with Utah Department of
Air Quality (DAQ) staff, the EPA was
informed that this is not accurate. A
clarifying letter was sent by the
Governor of Utah on June 6, 2017
requesting that the EPA act on both SIP
revisions. The submittals request SIP
revisions to the State’s General Burning
rule; a repeal and reenactment of the
General Burning rule with changes to
applicability, timing, and duration of
burning windows, and an amendment to
exempt Native American ceremonial
burning during restricted burning days.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jul 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
OAR–2015–0617 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Dresser, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6385,
dresser.chris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
1. Submitting Confidential Business
Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to
the EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information on a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Register volume, date, and page
number);
• Follow directions and organize your
comments;
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
• Suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes;
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used;
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced;
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives;
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats; and,
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Analysis of the State Submittal
On January 28, 2013, the State of Utah
requested that the EPA approve a repeal
and reenactment of R307–202, Emission
Standards: General Burning. The rule
was changed to add an ‘‘Applicability’’
section that clarifies that the rule only
applies to incorporated communities
under the authority of a county or
municipal fire authority. Additionally,
the 30-day burning windows allowing
the burning of material covered under
R307–202 were eliminated in the
amendment because they were a source
of localized air quality impairment. This
request was made by several local fire
chiefs with support from the Utah State
Fire Marshal. Language was also added
to the rule that states that no person
shall burn under R307–202 when the
director of the Division of Air Quality
(DAQ) issues a public announcement of
a mandatory no-burn period.
The changes made to R307–202
include the following five amendments:
(1) Fire marshals were previously
permitted to establish a spring 30-day
burn window between March 1 and May
30. The rule amendment expanded the
spring burning window for the entire
period from March 1 to May 30 for
Washington, Kane, San Juan, Iron,
Garfield, Beaver, Piute, Wayne, Grand,
and Emery counties. The burn window
was expanded because fire marshals
reported adverse localized air quality
conditions within the 30-day burn
window because the window was
actually compressed to a few days
where the Clearing Index was over 500.
The Utah DAQ relies on a metric called
the Clearing Index, an Air Quality/
Smoke Dispersal Index, to determine
when ventilation and dispersion are
adequate for general burning and as an
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32281-32282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14723]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-139633-08]
RIN 1545-BI18
Transactions Involving the Transfer of No Net Value
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Partial withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document withdraws the remaining part of a notice of
proposed rulemaking containing proposed regulations that would have
required an exchange or distribution of net value for certain corporate
formations and reorganizations to qualify for nonrecognition treatment
under the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Other parts of the notice of
proposed rulemaking were previously adopted as final regulations. The
proposed regulations being withdrawn also addressed the treatment of
certain distributions not qualifying for tax-free treatment under
section 332 of the Code. The proposed regulations being withdrawn would
have affected corporations and their shareholders.
DATES: As of July 13, 2017, the proposed revisions to Sec. 1.332-2(b)
and (e); the proposed addition of Example 2 to Sec. 1.332-2(e); the
proposed additions of Sec. 1.351-1(a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv); the
proposed addition of Example 4 to Sec. 1.351-1(a)(2); the proposed
amendments to Sec. 1.368-1(a) and (b); the proposed addition of Sec.
1.368-1(f); and the proposed revision to Sec. 1.368-2(d)(1) in the
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-163314-03) that was published in the
Federal Register (70 FR 11903) on March 10, 2005 are withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Broderick at (202) 317-6848 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 10, 2005, the Department of the Treasury (the Treasury
Department) and the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-
163314-03) in the Federal Register (70 FR 11903) containing proposed
regulations under sections 332, 351, and 368 (2005 Proposed
Regulations). The 2005 Proposed Regulations generally would have
provided that the non-recognition rules in subchapter C of chapter 1 of
subtitle 1 of the Code do not apply unless there is an exchange (or, in
the case of section 332, a distribution) of net value (the net value
requirement). The 2005 Proposed Regulations also provided that section
332 would apply only if the recipient corporation receives some payment
for each class of stock it owns in the liquidating corporation.
Finally, the 2005 Proposed Regulations provided guidance on the
circumstances in which (and the extent to which) creditors of a
corporation are treated as proprietors of the corporation in
determining whether continuity of interest is preserved in a potential
reorganization (Creditor Continuity of Interest).
On December 12, 2008, the Treasury Department and the IRS adopted
the Creditor Continuity of Interest provisions of the 2005 Proposed
Regulations as final regulations (TD 9434) published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 75566). Minor portions of the 2005 Proposed Regulations
that reflected statutory changes to sections 332 and 351 were adopted
as final regulations as part of a Treasury decision adopting final
regulations under sections 334(b)(1)(B) and 362(e)(1) (TD 9759),
published in the Federal Register (81 FR 17066) on March 28, 2016. The
Treasury Department and the IRS have decided to withdraw the remainder
of the 2005 Proposed Regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are of the view that current
law is sufficient to ensure that the reorganization provisions and
section 351 are used to accomplish readjustments of continuing
interests in property held in modified corporate form. With respect to
section 332, the holdings of H.K. Porter Co. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C.
689 (1986), Spaulding Bakeries Inc. v. Commissioner, 27 T.C. 684
(1957), aff'd, 252 F.2d 293 (2d Cir., 1958), H.G. Hill Stores, Inc. v.
Commissioner, 44 B.T.A. 1182 (1941), Rev. Rul. 2003-125, 2003-2 C.B.
1243, Rev. Rul. 68-602, 1968-2 C.B. 135, Rev. Rul. 68-359, 1968-2 C.B.
161, and Rev. Rul. 59-296, 1959-2 C.B. 87, continue to reflect the
position of the Treasury Department and the IRS.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this withdrawal notice is Jean Broderick of
the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other
personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in its
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 32282]]
Partial Withdrawal of Proposed Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the Treasury
Department and the IRS withdraw the proposed revisions to Sec. 1.332-
2(b) and (e); the proposed addition of Example 2 to Sec. 1.332-2(e);
the proposed additions of Sec. 1.351-1(a)(1)(iii) and (a)(1)(iv); the
proposed addition of Example 4 to Sec. 1.351-1(a)(2); the proposed
amendments to Sec. 1.368-1(a) and (b); the proposed addition of Sec.
1.368-1(f); and the proposed revision to Sec. 1.368-2(d)(1) in the
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-163314-03) that was published in the
Federal Register (70 FR 11903) on March 10, 2005.
Kirsten B. Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner of Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2017-14723 Filed 7-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P