Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 32366-32368 [2017-14703]
Download as PDF
32366
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Notices
in this draft FPL is intended to enable
the Council to most effectively meet
these fundamental commitments. The
Council looks forward to hearing from
the public on this proposal.
APPENDIX A—COUNCIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITMENTS
Topic
Commitment
Development of Funded Priority
Lists.
Take a holistic approach to restoration ........................................................................................
Continue to improve Submission Guidelines ...............................................................................
The Council adopted the watershed/estuary-based approach as a strategic planning principle
for future FPL development.
Healthy and sustainable ecosystems are essential for thriving and resilient coastal communities.
Encourage partnerships and additional public and private financial and technical support to
maximize outcomes and impacts.
Identify and leverage new sources of funding to support current and future restoration work
by exploring creative conservation funding.
The Council will refine its processes for considering public input on draft FPLs before finalizing changes to the final FPL.
Project evaluation and selection will be conducted in the most open manner feasible ..............
Will update and improve the process for applying BAS to FPL proposals, including exploring
the use of one or more science review panels.
Sponsor and participate in meetings and workshops in 2017 and into 2018 .............................
Facilitate meaningful engagement with range of stakeholders ...................................................
Maximize outcomes by leveraging funds and expertise ..............................................................
Coordination and collaboration among members and our restoration partners is critical to the
success of Gulf restoration.
Coordinate regulatory efforts across Council membership ..........................................................
Decisions made pursuant to the FPL will be based on the best available science ....................
The Council recognizes the importance of measuring outcomes and impacts in order to
achieve tangible results and ensure that funds are invested in a meaningful way.
Collaboration and Coordination
Science .....................................
Document Availability: Copies of the
draft CPS FPL are available at the
following office during regular business
hours: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration
Council, Hale Boggs Federal Building,
500 Poydras Street, Suite 1117, New
Orleans, LA 70130. The draft CPS FPL
can also be viewed and downloaded at
www.restorethegulf.gov.
Legal Authority: The statutory program
authority for the draft FPL is found at 33
U.S.C. 1321(t)(2).
Will D. Spoon,
Program Analyst, Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council.
[FR Doc. 2017–14690 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jul 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
changes to the currently approved
information collection project:
‘‘Developing a Registry of Registries.’’
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, AHRQ invites the public
to comment on this proposed
information collection. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register on
April 28, 2017, and allowed 60 days for
public comment. AHRQ did not receive
any substantive comments. The purpose
of this notice is to allow an additional
30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by August 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk
Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974
(attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by
email at OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk
officer).
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Revision of a Currently
Approved Collection Project:
‘‘Developing a Registry of Registries.’’
OMB Control Number: 0935–0203.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521,
AHRQ is extending the comment period
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Page No.
13, 14
17
22
23
23
25
25
25
27
17
17
17
24
26
6, 17, 27
27
for this this proposed information
collection on the development of a
registry of patient registries. Patient
registries have received significant
attention and funding in recent years.
Similar to controlled studies, patient
registries represent some burden to
patients (e.g., time to complete patient
reported outcome measures, risk of loss
of privacy), who often participate
voluntarily in hopes of improving
knowledge about a disease or condition.
Patient registries also represent a
substantial investment of health
research resources. Despite these
factors, patient registries are not
required to be registered in
ClinicalTrials.gov, presenting the
potential for duplication of efforts and
insufficient dissemination of findings
that are not published in the peerreviewed literature. To fulfill the
obligation to patients and to ensure that
resources are used in the most efficient
manner, registries need to be listed in a
manner similar to that of trials in
ClinicalTrials.gov.
By providing a centralized point of
collection for information about all
patient registries in the United States,
the Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR)
enhances patient registry information,
extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov,
building on AHRQ’s efforts to describe
the quality, appropriateness, and
effectiveness of health services (and
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Notices
patient registries in particular) in a more
readily available, central location.
The RoPR database system aims to
achieve the following objectives:
(1) Provide a searchable database of
patient registries in the United States (to
promote collaboration, reduce
redundancy, and improve
transparency);
(2) Facilitate the use of common data
fields and definitions in similar health
conditions (to improve opportunities for
sharing, comparing, and linkage);
(3) Provide a public repository of
searchable summary results (including
results from registries that have not yet
been published in the peer-reviewed
literature);
(4) Offer a search tool to locate
existing data that researchers can
request for use in new studies; and
(5) Serve as a recruitment tool for
researchers and patients interested in
participating in patient registries.
To achieve the objectives of this
project, the following data collections
will be implemented:
(1) Collect information on registries
from users who populate the RoPR
database system.
AHRQ is proposing to add a selfregistration option to the RoPR database
so that registry owners do not need a
National Library of Medicine Protocol
Registration System (PRS) account to
contribute. The current OMB-approved
RoPR system requires users to have a
PRS account. In the current data entry
process, registry owners enter most of
the registry information using the
ClinicalTrials.gov PRS. If a user defines
the ClinicalTrials.gov record as a patient
registry, that user will have the option
of following a link to the RoPR
submission page to input additional
information about the registry. Patient
registry data entered in the PRS is
uploaded to the RoPR system daily and
is accessible (along with information
entered directly into RoPR) to the public
via the RoPR search function. Under the
AHRQ proposal, these users could
complete a simple registration on the
RoPR site, which would be less
burdensome than the PRS registration
process, and then enter all registry
information directly on RoPR. The
rationale behind this alternative
registration pathway is that many
registries are created for quality
reporting, outcome tracking, and quality
improvement purposes, rather than for
research purposes. Registering in
ClinicalTrials.gov implies a research
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jul 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
purpose, so it is not necessarily
appropriate for non-research registries
to register in ClinicalTrials.gov, and
many have expressed that they do not
wish to do so. AHRQ anticipates that
more than 75 percent of registries would
still register through the
ClinicalTrials.com. However, the
remaining registries are extremely
important for health policy, and
providing them with a registration
pathway furthers the goal of creating a
central place where stakeholders can
find information on research and nonresearch registries pertinent to a specific
clinical topic.
The new self-registration pathway is
being developed by AHRQ through its
contractor, L&M Policy Research and
subcontractor Truven Health Analytics,
an IBM Company, pursuant to AHRQ’s
statutory authority to conduct and
support research on health care and on
systems for the delivery of such care,
including activities with respect to the
quality, effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of health care
services and with respect to database
development. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and
(8).
AHRQ, in collaboration with the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), is also proposing to add
three fields to the self-registration
pathway related to the CMS initiative to
create a Centralized Repository for
Public Health Agencies and Clinical
Data Registry Reporting. The purpose of
the repository is to assist eligible
professionals, eligible hospitals, and
critical access hospitals in finding
entities that accept electronic public
health data. By adding these fields to
the existing RoPR database, AHRQ will
further the goal of creating a central
place where stakeholders can find all
pertinent information on registries.
Method of Collection
The purpose and the use of the RoPR
is to provide a readily available public
resource strictly for patient registries,
following the model of
ClinicalTrials.gov, allowing for the
increased availability and efficacy of
patient registries. The information being
collected in the RoPR Record is visible
to the public visiting the RoPR Web site,
and is readily available for public use.
The RoPR is an ongoing data
collection initiative.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden hours for the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32367
respondent’s time to participate in the
RoPR. In 2016, 65 respondents manually
entered a new RoPR record. It is
expected that more than 75% of patient
registries are research-focused and will
continue to use the original
ClinicalTrials.gov pathway described
above. Thus, it is estimated that once
the self-registration pathway is
available, approximately 65 respondents
will enter RoPR records through the
ClinicalTrials.gov link annually, and an
additional 16 respondents (roughly 25%
of 65), representing non-research
registries, will enter RoPR records
through the new self-registration
pathway.
Each respondent would to need enter
his or her new RoPR record only once.
The RoPR system sends an automated
reminder to any registry owner who has
not updated his or her RoPR record in
the past year. In 2016, 132 RoPR entries
were updated and released. Using the
same logic as above, it is estimated that
an additional 33 entries (25% of 132)
might be updated annually once the
self-registration pathway is available.
In January 2017, Truven Health
Analytics used a sample of existing
ClinicalTrials.gov registry entries to
estimate the time needed to enter all
additional fields added through the selfregistration process. The sample
included records representing a range of
depth and complexity. For example, one
registry record contained only one
primary outcome measure. Another
record contained three more detailed
outcome measures (one primary, one
secondary, and one other.)
As a result of the knowledge gained
during these processes, it is estimated
that it will take users 10 minutes, on
average, to manually enter the
additional fields added through the selfregistration process. Adding this time to
the estimated burden of completing the
original RoPR fields (45 minutes), it is
estimated that it will take users 55
minutes to complete all fields through
the self-registration pathway.
It is estimated that it will take users
5 minutes to review and update the
fields added through the selfregistration pathway. Adding this time
to the estimated burden of reviewing
and updating the original RoPR fields
(15 minutes), it is estimated that it will
take 20 minutes for a person to review
and make updates to an existing RoPR
record created through the selfregistration pathway.
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
32368
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Notices
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
New RoPR Record entered manually through self-registration process ........
New RoPR Record entered through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway .....................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created through self-registration process ................................................................................................................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created through ClinicalTrials.gov
pathway ........................................................................................................
Total ..........................................................................................................
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated cost
burden associated with the respondent’s
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
Minutes per
response
Total burden
hours
16
65
1
1
55/60
45/60
14.67
48.75
33
1
20/60
11
132
1
15/60
33
246
........................
........................
107.42
time to participate in the RoPR. The
total cost burden to respondents is
estimated at an average of $4,017.51
annually.
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Form name
New RoPR Record entered manually through self-registration process ........
New RoPR Record entered through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway .....................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created through self-registration process ................................................................................................................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created through ClinicalTrials.gov
pathway ........................................................................................................
Total ..........................................................................................................
Total burden
hours
Average
hourly wage
rate †
Total cost
burden
16
65
14.67
48.75
$37.40
37.40
$548.66
1,823.25
33
11
37.40
411.40
132
33
37.40
1,234.20
246
107.42
37.40
4,017.51
† Based on the mean wages for Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations, 29–0000. National Compensation Survey: Occupational
wages in the United States May 2015, ‘‘U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.’’ Available at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
oes290000.htm.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ’s
information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of AHRQ health care
research and health care information
dissemination functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Jul 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Sharon B. Arnold,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2017–14703 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Supplemental Evidence and Data
Request on Stroke Prevention in Atrial
Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic
Review Update
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Request for supplemental
evidence and data submissions.
AGENCY:
The Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking
scientific information submissions from
the public. Scientific information is
being solicited to inform our review of
Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
Patients: A Systematic Review Update,
which is currently being conducted by
the AHRQ’s Evidence-based Practice
Centers (EPC) Program. Access to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
published and unpublished pertinent
scientific information will improve the
quality of this review.
DATES: Submission Deadline on or
before August 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES:
Email submissions: SEADS@epcsrc.org.
Print submissions:
Mailing Address: Portland VA
Research Foundation, Scientific
Resource Center, ATTN: Scientific
Information Packet Coordinator, P.O.
Box 69539, Portland, OR 97239.
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
Portland VA Research Foundation,
Scientific Resource Center, ATTN:
Scientific Information Packet
Coordinator, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans
Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71,
Portland, OR 97239.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan McKenna, Telephone: 503–220–
8262 ext. 51723 or Email: SEADS@epcsrc.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality has commissioned the
Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC)
Program to complete a review of the
evidence for Stroke Prevention in Atrial
Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic
Review Update. AHRQ is conducting
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32366-32368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14703]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed changes to the
currently approved information collection project: ``Developing a
Registry of Registries.''
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, AHRQ invites the
public to comment on this proposed information collection. This
proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal
Register on April 28, 2017, and allowed 60 days for public comment.
AHRQ did not receive any substantive comments. The purpose of this
notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by August 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ's OMB Desk
Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (attention: AHRQ's desk officer) or by
email at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ's desk officer).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Project:
``Developing a Registry of Registries.''
OMB Control Number: 0935-0203.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521, AHRQ is extending the comment period for this this proposed
information collection on the development of a registry of patient
registries. Patient registries have received significant attention and
funding in recent years. Similar to controlled studies, patient
registries represent some burden to patients (e.g., time to complete
patient reported outcome measures, risk of loss of privacy), who often
participate voluntarily in hopes of improving knowledge about a disease
or condition. Patient registries also represent a substantial
investment of health research resources. Despite these factors, patient
registries are not required to be registered in ClinicalTrials.gov,
presenting the potential for duplication of efforts and insufficient
dissemination of findings that are not published in the peer-reviewed
literature. To fulfill the obligation to patients and to ensure that
resources are used in the most efficient manner, registries need to be
listed in a manner similar to that of trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.
By providing a centralized point of collection for information
about all patient registries in the United States, the Registry of
Patient Registries (RoPR) enhances patient registry information,
extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov, building on AHRQ's efforts to
describe the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of health
services (and
[[Page 32367]]
patient registries in particular) in a more readily available, central
location.
The RoPR database system aims to achieve the following objectives:
(1) Provide a searchable database of patient registries in the
United States (to promote collaboration, reduce redundancy, and improve
transparency);
(2) Facilitate the use of common data fields and definitions in
similar health conditions (to improve opportunities for sharing,
comparing, and linkage);
(3) Provide a public repository of searchable summary results
(including results from registries that have not yet been published in
the peer-reviewed literature);
(4) Offer a search tool to locate existing data that researchers
can request for use in new studies; and
(5) Serve as a recruitment tool for researchers and patients
interested in participating in patient registries.
To achieve the objectives of this project, the following data
collections will be implemented:
(1) Collect information on registries from users who populate the
RoPR database system.
AHRQ is proposing to add a self-registration option to the RoPR
database so that registry owners do not need a National Library of
Medicine Protocol Registration System (PRS) account to contribute. The
current OMB-approved RoPR system requires users to have a PRS account.
In the current data entry process, registry owners enter most of the
registry information using the ClinicalTrials.gov PRS. If a user
defines the ClinicalTrials.gov record as a patient registry, that user
will have the option of following a link to the RoPR submission page to
input additional information about the registry. Patient registry data
entered in the PRS is uploaded to the RoPR system daily and is
accessible (along with information entered directly into RoPR) to the
public via the RoPR search function. Under the AHRQ proposal, these
users could complete a simple registration on the RoPR site, which
would be less burdensome than the PRS registration process, and then
enter all registry information directly on RoPR. The rationale behind
this alternative registration pathway is that many registries are
created for quality reporting, outcome tracking, and quality
improvement purposes, rather than for research purposes. Registering in
ClinicalTrials.gov implies a research purpose, so it is not necessarily
appropriate for non-research registries to register in
ClinicalTrials.gov, and many have expressed that they do not wish to do
so. AHRQ anticipates that more than 75 percent of registries would
still register through the ClinicalTrials.com. However, the remaining
registries are extremely important for health policy, and providing
them with a registration pathway furthers the goal of creating a
central place where stakeholders can find information on research and
non-research registries pertinent to a specific clinical topic.
The new self-registration pathway is being developed by AHRQ
through its contractor, L&M Policy Research and subcontractor Truven
Health Analytics, an IBM Company, pursuant to AHRQ's statutory
authority to conduct and support research on health care and on systems
for the delivery of such care, including activities with respect to the
quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and value of health
care services and with respect to database development. 42 U.S.C.
299a(a)(1) and (8).
AHRQ, in collaboration with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), is also proposing to add three fields to the self-
registration pathway related to the CMS initiative to create a
Centralized Repository for Public Health Agencies and Clinical Data
Registry Reporting. The purpose of the repository is to assist eligible
professionals, eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals in
finding entities that accept electronic public health data. By adding
these fields to the existing RoPR database, AHRQ will further the goal
of creating a central place where stakeholders can find all pertinent
information on registries.
Method of Collection
The purpose and the use of the RoPR is to provide a readily
available public resource strictly for patient registries, following
the model of ClinicalTrials.gov, allowing for the increased
availability and efficacy of patient registries. The information being
collected in the RoPR Record is visible to the public visiting the RoPR
Web site, and is readily available for public use.
The RoPR is an ongoing data collection initiative.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the
respondent's time to participate in the RoPR. In 2016, 65 respondents
manually entered a new RoPR record. It is expected that more than 75%
of patient registries are research-focused and will continue to use the
original ClinicalTrials.gov pathway described above. Thus, it is
estimated that once the self-registration pathway is available,
approximately 65 respondents will enter RoPR records through the
ClinicalTrials.gov link annually, and an additional 16 respondents
(roughly 25% of 65), representing non-research registries, will enter
RoPR records through the new self-registration pathway.
Each respondent would to need enter his or her new RoPR record only
once. The RoPR system sends an automated reminder to any registry owner
who has not updated his or her RoPR record in the past year. In 2016,
132 RoPR entries were updated and released. Using the same logic as
above, it is estimated that an additional 33 entries (25% of 132) might
be updated annually once the self-registration pathway is available.
In January 2017, Truven Health Analytics used a sample of existing
ClinicalTrials.gov registry entries to estimate the time needed to
enter all additional fields added through the self-registration
process. The sample included records representing a range of depth and
complexity. For example, one registry record contained only one primary
outcome measure. Another record contained three more detailed outcome
measures (one primary, one secondary, and one other.)
As a result of the knowledge gained during these processes, it is
estimated that it will take users 10 minutes, on average, to manually
enter the additional fields added through the self-registration
process. Adding this time to the estimated burden of completing the
original RoPR fields (45 minutes), it is estimated that it will take
users 55 minutes to complete all fields through the self-registration
pathway.
It is estimated that it will take users 5 minutes to review and
update the fields added through the self-registration pathway. Adding
this time to the estimated burden of reviewing and updating the
original RoPR fields (15 minutes), it is estimated that it will take 20
minutes for a person to review and make updates to an existing RoPR
record created through the self-registration pathway.
[[Page 32368]]
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Form name Number of responses per Minutes per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New RoPR Record entered manually through self- 16 1 55/60 14.67
registration process...........................
New RoPR Record entered through 65 1 45/60 48.75
ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.....................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created 33 1 20/60 11
through self-registration process..............
Review/update existing RoPR Record created 132 1 15/60 33
through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.............
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 246 .............. .............. 107.42
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated cost burden associated with the
respondent's time to participate in the RoPR. The total cost burden to
respondents is estimated at an average of $4,017.51 annually.
Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average hourly
Form name Number of Total burden wage rate Total cost
respondents hours [dagger] burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New RoPR Record entered manually through self- 16 14.67 $37.40 $548.66
registration process...........................
New RoPR Record entered through 65 48.75 37.40 1,823.25
ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.....................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created 33 11 37.40 411.40
through self-registration process..............
Review/update existing RoPR Record created 132 33 37.40 1,234.20
through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.............
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 246 107.42 37.40 4,017.51
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[dagger] Based on the mean wages for Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations, 29-0000. National
Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States May 2015, ``U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics.'' Available at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes290000.htm.
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ's
information collection are requested with regard to any of the
following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ health care research and
health care information dissemination functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's
estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Sharon B. Arnold,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2017-14703 Filed 7-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P