Sassan Bassiri, D.D.S.; Decision and Order, 32200-32202 [2017-14597]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
32200
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
accessing its Internet server at United
States International Trade Commission
(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission’s
Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure filed on behalf of
Qualcomm Incorporated on July 07,
2017. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain mobile electronic devices and
radio frequency and processing
components thereof. The complaint
names as a respondent, Apple Inc. of
Cupertino, CA. The complainant
requests that the Commission issue a
limited exclusion order, a cease and
desist order, and impose a bond upon
respondents’ alleged infringing articles
during the 60-day Presidential review
period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j).
Proposed respondents, other
interested parties, and members of the
public are invited to file comments, not
to exceed five (5) pages in length,
inclusive of attachments, on any public
interest issues raised by the complaint
or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should
address whether issuance of the relief
specifically requested by the
complainant in this investigation would
affect the public health and welfare in
the United States, competitive
conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) explain how the articles potentially
subject to the requested remedial orders
are used in the United States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the requested remedial
orders;
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the requested
exclusion order and/or a cease and
desist order within a commercially
reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the requested
remedial orders would impact United
States consumers.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business, eight
calendar days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. There will be further
opportunities for comment on the
public interest after the issuance of any
final initial determination in this
investigation.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to § 210.4(f)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)).
Submissions should refer to the docket
number (‘‘Docket No. 3235’’) in a
prominent place on the cover page and/
or the first page. (See Handbook for
Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic
Filing Procedures 1). Persons with
questions regarding filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to
the Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. All information,
including confidential business
information and documents for which
confidential treatment is properly
sought, submitted to the Commission for
purposes of this Investigation may be
disclosed to and used: (i) By the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
for Electronic Filing Procedures:
https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_
filing_procedures.pdf.
PO 00000
1 Handbook
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary
and on EDIS.3
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 7, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–14586 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Sassan Bassiri, D.D.S.; Decision and
Order
On February 7, 2017, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to Sassan Bassiri, D.D.S.
(Applicant), of King, North Carolina.
The Show Cause Order proposed the
denial of his application for a DEA
Certificate of Registration on the ground
that he has ‘‘been excluded from
participation in a program pursuant to
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7(a).’’ Government
Exhibit (GX) H, at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C.
824(a)(5)).
With respect to the Agency’s
jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order
alleged that on February 9, 2016,
Applicant ‘‘applied for a DEA
[Certificate of Registration] as a
practitioner in Schedules II–V’’ at the
registered address of 226 Kirby Road,
King, North Carolina. Id. at 2.
Regarding the substantive ground for
the proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that on February 28, 2014, the
Office of the Inspector General for the
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) notified Applicant that,
effective March 20, 2014, he would be
excluded from participation in any
capacity in the Medicare, Medicaid, and
all Federal health care programs for five
years because he was convicted of a
2 All contract personnel will sign appropriate
nondisclosure agreements.
3 Electronic Document Information System
(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov.
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
program-related offense pursuant to
§ 1128(i) of the Social Security Act
(SSA). Id. (citing 42 U.S.C. 1320a–7(a)
and (i)). As a result, the Order stated
that Applicant’s exclusion from
participation in federal health care
programs ‘‘constitutes grounds to deny
[his] application under 21 U.S.C.
824(a)(5).’’ Id. at 3.
The Show Cause Order notified
Applicant of (1) his right to request a
hearing on the allegations or to submit
a written statement in lieu of a hearing,
(2) the procedure for electing either
option, and (3) the consequence for
failing to elect either option. Id. (citing
21 CFR 1301.43). The Show Cause
Order also notified Applicant of his
right to submit a corrective action plan.
Id. at 3–4 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)).
From February 7, 2017 through
February 18, 2017, the Government
states that it attempted to serve the
Show Cause Order on Applicant by U.S.
Mail, electronic mail, Federal Express,
U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail, and
in-person. Government Request for
Final Agency Action (Request or RFFA),
at 4. As evidenced by the signed return
receipt card, on February 18, 2017, the
Government accomplished service. GX
I.
On April 17, 2017, the Government
forwarded its Request for Final Agency
Action and evidentiary record to my
Office. In its Request, the Government
represents that Applicant neither
requested a hearing nor ‘‘filed any
written statement in lieu of a hearing or
requested a Corrective Action Plan
(CAP).’’ RFFA, at 4. Based on the
Government’s representation and the
record, I find that more than 30 days
have passed since the Order to Show
Cause was served on Applicant, and he
has neither requested a hearing nor
submitted a written statement in lieu of
a hearing. Id. (citing 21 CFR 1301.43(d)).
Accordingly, I find that Applicant has
waived his right to a hearing or to
submit a written statement and issue
this Decision and Order based on
relevant evidence submitted by the
Government. I make the following
findings.
Findings of Fact
Applicant is a doctor of dental
surgery. Applicant was previously
registered with the DEA as a practitioner
in schedules II–V pursuant to Certificate
of Registration BB8537738. However, he
surrendered this Registration to DEA on
May 10, 2011. GX A. On February 9,
2016, Applicant applied for a DEA
Certificate of Registration as a
practitioner in schedules II–V with a
registered address at 226 Kirby Road,
King, North Carolina. GX G.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
On March 17, 2011, the North
Carolina State Board of Dental
Examiners found that Applicant had
intentionally defrauded the North
Carolina Division of Medical Assistance
(Medicaid), which led to the revocation
of his dental license starting in April
2011. GX F, at 2–3. On January 2, 2013,
Applicant entered a guilty plea in the
United States District Court for the
Middle District of North Carolina to
three charges of health care fraud in
connection with a scheme to defraud
the North Carolina State Medicaid
program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1347.
GX C. On May 10, 2013, a federal court
entered judgment and sentenced
Applicant to a term of imprisonment of
five months on each count, but provided
that the sentences would ‘‘run
concurrently with each other,’’ followed
by five months of home confinement.
GX D, at 2, 4. The sentencing judge also
ordered Applicant to pay a $10,000
statutory fine and $68,795.65 in
restitution to the Medicaid program, and
further ordered that Applicant be on
supervised release for two years after
the conclusion of his sentence. Id. at 3,
5.
The record also includes a February
28, 2014 letter from HHS notifying
Applicant that he was ‘‘being excluded
from participation in any capacity in the
Medicare, Medicaid, and all Federal
health care programs as defined in
section 1128B(f)’’ of the SSA ‘‘for the
minimum statutory period of five
years.’’ GX E, at 1 (emphasis in original).
The letter explained that Applicant was
being excluded ‘‘due to [his] conviction
. . . in the United States District Court
for the Middle District of North
Carolina, of a criminal offense related to
the delivery of an item or service under
the Medicare or a State health care
program.’’ Id. The letter states that
‘‘[t]his action is being taken under
section 1128(a)(1) of the [SSA] 1 and is
effective’’ on March 20, 2014. Id. (citing
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7(a)).2
On February 3, 2016, the North
Carolina State Board of Dental
Examiners issued an order placing
Applicant under a restricted license
allowing him to resume practicing
dentistry subject to certain limitations,
1 Section 1128(a)(1) of the SSA is codified at 42
U.S.C. 1320a–7(a)(1).
2 The letter also notes that ‘‘[w]e are aware that
you are currently excluded from participation in the
Medicare and State health care programs under
section 1128(b)(4)’’ of the SSA based on a February
29, 2012 letter from HHS to Applicant because
North Carolina revoked his dental license starting
in April 2011. Id.; GX B, at 1 (citing 42 U.S.C.
1320a–7(b)); GX F, at 3. HHS specified that the
exclusion set forth in its 2014 letter was ‘‘in
addition to that [2012 exclusion] action and will
run concurrently with it.’’ GX E, at 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32201
including that he practice for one year
‘‘under the supervision of a [North
Carolina licensed] dentist’’ and only
practice (with the Board’s prior
approval) at an institution like a
hospital or sanatorium, a non-profit
health care facility servicing lowincome patients, or for a State of North
Carolina government agency or entity.
GX F, at 7–8. After one year, the Board
also stated that Applicant may either
renew his restricted license or seek an
unrestricted dental license. Id. at 9.
Discussion
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(5), the
Attorney General is authorized to
suspend or revoke a registration issued
under section 823 of Title 21, ‘‘upon a
finding that the registrant . . . has been
excluded . . . from participation in a
program pursuant to section 1320a–7(a)
of Title 42.’’ ‘‘It is well established that
the various grounds for revocation or
suspension of an existing registration
that Congress enumerated in [§ 824(a)]
are also properly considered in deciding
whether to grant or deny an application
under [§ 823].’’ Arthur H. Bell, 80 FR
50035, 50037 (2015) (citing The
Lawsons, Inc., 72 FR 74334, 74337
(2007); Anthony D. Funches, 64 FR
14267, 14268 (1999); Alan R.
Schankman, 63 FR 45260 (1998); Kuen
H. Chen, 58 FR 65401, 65402 (1993));
see also Serling Drug Co. and Detroit
Prescription Wholesaler, Inc., 40 FR
11918 (1975) (holding that the CSA does
not require the Agency to indulge in the
useless act of granting a license on one
day only to withdraw it on the next).
Thus, the allegation that Applicant has
been excluded from participation in a
program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1320a–
7(a) is properly considered in this
proceeding. See Bell, 80 FR at 50037
(finding that the allegation that
Respondent had materially falsified his
application pursuant to § 824(a)(1) was
properly considered in application
denial proceeding).
Under § 1320a–7(a)(1), HHS is
required to exclude from participation
in any Federal health care program any
individual who has been convicted of a
criminal offense ‘‘related to the delivery
of an item or service under [42 U.S.C.
1395 et seq.] or under any State health
care program.’’ Based on the 2014 letter,
I find that the evidence shows that HHS
excluded Applicant from participation
in any federal health care program based
on his federal convictions for health
care fraud. Applicant has thus been
excluded pursuant to the mandatory
exclusion provisions of 42 U.S.C.
1320a–7(a). Accordingly, I will order
that his application be denied.
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
32202
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
Order
Pursuant to the authority vested in me
by 21 U.S.C. 823(f), as well as 28 CFR
0.100(b), I order that the application of
Sassan Bassiri, D.D.S., for a DEA
Certificate of Registration as a
practitioner be, and it hereby is, denied.
The Order is effective immediately.
Dated: July 2, 2017.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–14597 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Justice
[OMB Number 1121–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed New Information
Collection Activity; Comment Request,
Proposed Study Entitled ‘‘Tribal Youth
Victimization Methods Study’’
National Institute of Justice,
U.S. Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
National Institute of Justice, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until August 11, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Christine
Crossland, National Institute of Justice,
Office of Research and Evaluation, 810
Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC
20531 (overnight 20001) or via email at
christine.crossland@ojp.usdoj.gov.
Written comments and/or suggestions
can also be sent to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent
to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the National Institute of
Justice, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether, and if so how, the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Survey development; Cognitive testing;
Pilot testing of survey.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Tribal Youth Victimization Methods
Study.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The applicable component within the
U.S. Department of Justice is the
National Institute of Justice in the Office
of Justice Programs.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: There has never been a
national study of tribal youth regarding
their victimization experiences that
provides reliable, valid estimates of the
scope of the problem. As a result, the
incidence, prevalence, and nature of
victimization experienced by American
Indian and Alaska Native youth living
in tribal communities is unknown. As a
result, NIJ, in partnership with the
Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention and the Office
for Victims of Crime has funded this
methods study that involves developing
and testing a survey instrument, testing
different modes of administration that
can effectively assess exposure to
violence and victimization, and
determining the feasibility of using
these procedures in tribal communities
and settings.
The sample includes tribal youth 12
to 20 years of age. Cognitive testing will
be conducted in four tribal settings with
between 12–15 youth at each site. The
pilot test involves the use of at least two
but no more than three different modes
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
of administration modes [e.g., face-toface interviews, self-administered
questionnaire in paper and pencil
format, audio computer assisted selfadministered interviews (required),
computer assisted telephone
interviews]. The target sample is 375
completed interviews from three tribal
settings (one in Alaska and two in the
lower 48).
Among the key outcomes that will be
examined are the response and refusal
rates, missing data, interview length,
willingness to disclose sensitive
information, respondent comfort, cost,
ability to provide assistance to
respondents, and the ease and adequacy
of the human subjects’ protocol.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The estimated range of burden
for respondents participating in the
cognitive interview is 90 minutes.
Approximately 48 youth will be
recruited to complete a cognitive
interview. The estimated range of
burden for respondents completing the
survey in the pilot phase is expected to
be 60 minutes for completion. The
following factors were considered when
creating the burden estimate: The
estimated total number of sites (i.e., 4
cognitive sites and 3 pilot sites),
respondents (i.e., 48 cognitive
interviews and 375 pilot interviews for
a total of 423 respondents), and parental
and youth informed consent procedures
for each phase.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated public burden
associated with this collection is 447
hours. It is estimated that each of the
cognitive interviews will take 90
minutes to complete (48 respondents ×
1.5 hour = 72 hours). Lastly, it is
estimated that each pilot survey will
take 60 minutes to complete (375
respondents × 1 hour = 375 hours). We
estimate a 12-month data collection
period, with all cognitive and pilot
testing completed in one year.
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: July 6, 2017.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–14529 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32200-32202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14597]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Sassan Bassiri, D.D.S.; Decision and Order
On February 7, 2017, the Assistant Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an Order to
Show Cause to Sassan Bassiri, D.D.S. (Applicant), of King, North
Carolina. The Show Cause Order proposed the denial of his application
for a DEA Certificate of Registration on the ground that he has ``been
excluded from participation in a program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1320a-
7(a).'' Government Exhibit (GX) H, at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(5)).
With respect to the Agency's jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order
alleged that on February 9, 2016, Applicant ``applied for a DEA
[Certificate of Registration] as a practitioner in Schedules II-V'' at
the registered address of 226 Kirby Road, King, North Carolina. Id. at
2.
Regarding the substantive ground for the proceeding, the Show Cause
Order alleged that on February 28, 2014, the Office of the Inspector
General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
notified Applicant that, effective March 20, 2014, he would be excluded
from participation in any capacity in the Medicare, Medicaid, and all
Federal health care programs for five years because he was convicted of
a
[[Page 32201]]
program-related offense pursuant to Sec. 1128(i) of the Social
Security Act (SSA). Id. (citing 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(a) and (i)). As a
result, the Order stated that Applicant's exclusion from participation
in federal health care programs ``constitutes grounds to deny [his]
application under 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(5).'' Id. at 3.
The Show Cause Order notified Applicant of (1) his right to request
a hearing on the allegations or to submit a written statement in lieu
of a hearing, (2) the procedure for electing either option, and (3) the
consequence for failing to elect either option. Id. (citing 21 CFR
1301.43). The Show Cause Order also notified Applicant of his right to
submit a corrective action plan. Id. at 3-4 (citing 21 U.S.C.
824(c)(2)(C)).
From February 7, 2017 through February 18, 2017, the Government
states that it attempted to serve the Show Cause Order on Applicant by
U.S. Mail, electronic mail, Federal Express, U.S. Postal Service
Certified Mail, and in-person. Government Request for Final Agency
Action (Request or RFFA), at 4. As evidenced by the signed return
receipt card, on February 18, 2017, the Government accomplished
service. GX I.
On April 17, 2017, the Government forwarded its Request for Final
Agency Action and evidentiary record to my Office. In its Request, the
Government represents that Applicant neither requested a hearing nor
``filed any written statement in lieu of a hearing or requested a
Corrective Action Plan (CAP).'' RFFA, at 4. Based on the Government's
representation and the record, I find that more than 30 days have
passed since the Order to Show Cause was served on Applicant, and he
has neither requested a hearing nor submitted a written statement in
lieu of a hearing. Id. (citing 21 CFR 1301.43(d)). Accordingly, I find
that Applicant has waived his right to a hearing or to submit a written
statement and issue this Decision and Order based on relevant evidence
submitted by the Government. I make the following findings.
Findings of Fact
Applicant is a doctor of dental surgery. Applicant was previously
registered with the DEA as a practitioner in schedules II-V pursuant to
Certificate of Registration BB8537738. However, he surrendered this
Registration to DEA on May 10, 2011. GX A. On February 9, 2016,
Applicant applied for a DEA Certificate of Registration as a
practitioner in schedules II-V with a registered address at 226 Kirby
Road, King, North Carolina. GX G.
On March 17, 2011, the North Carolina State Board of Dental
Examiners found that Applicant had intentionally defrauded the North
Carolina Division of Medical Assistance (Medicaid), which led to the
revocation of his dental license starting in April 2011. GX F, at 2-3.
On January 2, 2013, Applicant entered a guilty plea in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina to
three charges of health care fraud in connection with a scheme to
defraud the North Carolina State Medicaid program, in violation of 18
U.S.C. 1347. GX C. On May 10, 2013, a federal court entered judgment
and sentenced Applicant to a term of imprisonment of five months on
each count, but provided that the sentences would ``run concurrently
with each other,'' followed by five months of home confinement. GX D,
at 2, 4. The sentencing judge also ordered Applicant to pay a $10,000
statutory fine and $68,795.65 in restitution to the Medicaid program,
and further ordered that Applicant be on supervised release for two
years after the conclusion of his sentence. Id. at 3, 5.
The record also includes a February 28, 2014 letter from HHS
notifying Applicant that he was ``being excluded from participation in
any capacity in the Medicare, Medicaid, and all Federal health care
programs as defined in section 1128B(f)'' of the SSA ``for the minimum
statutory period of five years.'' GX E, at 1 (emphasis in original).
The letter explained that Applicant was being excluded ``due to [his]
conviction . . . in the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, of a criminal offense related to the
delivery of an item or service under the Medicare or a State health
care program.'' Id. The letter states that ``[t]his action is being
taken under section 1128(a)(1) of the [SSA] \1\ and is effective'' on
March 20, 2014. Id. (citing 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(a)).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 1128(a)(1) of the SSA is codified at 42 U.S.C.
1320a-7(a)(1).
\2\ The letter also notes that ``[w]e are aware that you are
currently excluded from participation in the Medicare and State
health care programs under section 1128(b)(4)'' of the SSA based on
a February 29, 2012 letter from HHS to Applicant because North
Carolina revoked his dental license starting in April 2011. Id.; GX
B, at 1 (citing 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(b)); GX F, at 3. HHS specified
that the exclusion set forth in its 2014 letter was ``in addition to
that [2012 exclusion] action and will run concurrently with it.'' GX
E, at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 3, 2016, the North Carolina State Board of Dental
Examiners issued an order placing Applicant under a restricted license
allowing him to resume practicing dentistry subject to certain
limitations, including that he practice for one year ``under the
supervision of a [North Carolina licensed] dentist'' and only practice
(with the Board's prior approval) at an institution like a hospital or
sanatorium, a non-profit health care facility servicing low-income
patients, or for a State of North Carolina government agency or entity.
GX F, at 7-8. After one year, the Board also stated that Applicant may
either renew his restricted license or seek an unrestricted dental
license. Id. at 9.
Discussion
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(5), the Attorney General is authorized
to suspend or revoke a registration issued under section 823 of Title
21, ``upon a finding that the registrant . . . has been excluded . . .
from participation in a program pursuant to section 1320a-7(a) of Title
42.'' ``It is well established that the various grounds for revocation
or suspension of an existing registration that Congress enumerated in
[Sec. 824(a)] are also properly considered in deciding whether to
grant or deny an application under [Sec. 823].'' Arthur H. Bell, 80 FR
50035, 50037 (2015) (citing The Lawsons, Inc., 72 FR 74334, 74337
(2007); Anthony D. Funches, 64 FR 14267, 14268 (1999); Alan R.
Schankman, 63 FR 45260 (1998); Kuen H. Chen, 58 FR 65401, 65402
(1993)); see also Serling Drug Co. and Detroit Prescription Wholesaler,
Inc., 40 FR 11918 (1975) (holding that the CSA does not require the
Agency to indulge in the useless act of granting a license on one day
only to withdraw it on the next). Thus, the allegation that Applicant
has been excluded from participation in a program pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
1320a-7(a) is properly considered in this proceeding. See Bell, 80 FR
at 50037 (finding that the allegation that Respondent had materially
falsified his application pursuant to Sec. 824(a)(1) was properly
considered in application denial proceeding).
Under Sec. 1320a-7(a)(1), HHS is required to exclude from
participation in any Federal health care program any individual who has
been convicted of a criminal offense ``related to the delivery of an
item or service under [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.] or under any State
health care program.'' Based on the 2014 letter, I find that the
evidence shows that HHS excluded Applicant from participation in any
federal health care program based on his federal convictions for health
care fraud. Applicant has thus been excluded pursuant to the mandatory
exclusion provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(a). Accordingly, I will order
that his application be denied.
[[Page 32202]]
Order
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823(f), as well
as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that the application of Sassan Bassiri,
D.D.S., for a DEA Certificate of Registration as a practitioner be, and
it hereby is, denied. The Order is effective immediately.
Dated: July 2, 2017.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-14597 Filed 7-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P