Fisheries of the South Atlantic; Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); Public Meetings; Cancellation, 29844-29845 [2017-13662]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
29844
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Notices
include notification and reporting
requirements in the unlikely event that
any unauthorized access, use, or
dissemination of any Census Bureau
information would occur.
To reiterate, the information at issue
is not a respondent’s personal
information, rather, it is cyber threat
information. E3A does not provide DHS
with access to a respondent’s personal
information. E3A does not currently
decrypt respondent information or scan
data at rest on Census Bureau
information systems.
4. The ADC is concerned that the
revised confidentiality pledge ‘‘raises
flags on improper use of such
information.’’
Response: The Act limits DHS’s use of
information collected pursuant to the
Act to the protection of ‘‘information
and information systems from
cybersecurity risks.’’ To be clear, DHS’s
use of the information for any other
purpose would be unlawful.
5. The AAJC suggests that the
protections contained in Title 13 and
the Confidential Information Protection
and Statistical Efficiency Act (CIPSEA),
both of which limit the use and
disclosure of information collected,
should control the information at issue.
Response: Pursuant to the Act, each
agency must ‘‘apply and continue to
utilize the capabilities to all information
traveling between an agency
information system and any information
system other than an agency
information system.’’ Congress
authorized that, notwithstanding the
protections previously afforded to
information by other laws, such as Title
13, for the purpose of protecting agency
information systems from cyber attacks,
DHS may access information transiting
and traveling to or from an agency
information system. Census Bureau
employees remain subject to the
penalties contained in Title 13,
including a federal prison sentence of
up to five years and a fine of up to
$250,000, or both.
6. The AAJC suggests that either the
Census Bureau employees ‘‘perform
Einstein 3A functions for Census Bureau
internet traffic’’ or that ‘‘DHS employees
monitoring Census Bureau internet
traffic under Einstein 3A take the
current Title 13 confidentiality pledge.’’
Response: The Act provides DHS
access to network traffic transiting or
traveling to or from the Census Bureau’s
information systems, notwithstanding
the protections previously afforded to
information by other laws, such as Title
13. The Act also requires each agency to
‘‘apply and continue to utilize the
capabilities to all information traveling
between an agency information system
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Jun 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
and any information system other than
an agency information system.’’
In addition to the safeguards
contained in the Act, the Census Bureau
works with DHS to safeguard
respondent information. These
additional safeguards cover the
collection, retention, use, and disclosure
of information. The safeguards also
include notification and reporting
requirements that would apply in the
unlikely event that any unauthorized
access, use, or dissemination of any
Census Bureau information would
occur.
III. Data
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau,
Department of Commerce.
Title: Revision of the Confidentiality
Pledge under Title 13 United States
Code, Section 9.
OMB Control Number: 0607–0993.
Form Number(s): None.
Affected Public: All survey
respondents to Census Bureau data
collections.
Legal Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(e) and
13 U.S.C. Section 9.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on the
necessity and efficacy of the Census
Bureau’s revised confidentiality pledge
above. Comments submitted in response
to this notice will become a matter of
public record. Comments should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)395–5806.
Dated: June 27, 2017.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer on behalf of
the Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2017–13778 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF304
Fisheries of the South Atlantic;
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR); Public Meetings;
Cancellation
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of change of schedule for
SEDAR 56 South Atlantic Black Sea
Bass Assessment Webinars.
ACTION:
The SEDAR 56 assessment of
the South Atlantic stock of black seabass
will consist of a series webinars. Due to
changes to the schedule for the stock
assessment, webinars scheduled for
Thursday, July 20, 2017 and
Wednesday, August 16, 2017 have been
cancelled. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
DATES: This notice serves to cancel the
previously scheduled July 20, 2017 and
August 16, 2017 webinars.
ADDRESSES: SEDAR address: South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council,
4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N.
Charleston, SC 29405;
www.sedarweb.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Byrd, SEDAR Coordinator, 4055 Faber
Place Drive, Suite 201, North
Charleston, SC 29405; phone: (843) 571–
4366; email: julia.byrd@safmc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
original notice published in the Federal
Register on March 29, 2017 (82 FR
15495).
The Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic,
and Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils, in conjunction with NOAA
Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commissions,
have implemented the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process, a multi-step method for
determining the status of fish stocks in
the Southeast Region. The product of
the SEDAR webinar series will be a
report which compiles and evaluates
potential datasets and recommends
which datasets are appropriate for
assessment analyses, and describes the
fisheries, evaluates the status of the
stock, estimates biological benchmarks,
projects future population conditions,
and recommends research and
monitoring needs. Participants for
SEDAR Workshops are appointed by the
Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and
Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils and NOAA Fisheries Southeast
Regional Office, Highly Migratory
Species Management Division, and
Southeast Fisheries Science Center.
Participants include: Data collectors and
database managers; stock assessment
scientists, biologists, and researchers;
constituency representatives including
fishermen, environmentalists, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs);
international experts; and staff of
Councils, Commissions, and state and
federal agencies.
During its June 2017 meeting, the
South Atlantic Fishery Management
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Notices
Council made a decision to change the
terminal year for the data used on the
stock assessment for the South Atlantic
black sea bass stock. The decision
affects the schedule for the stock
assessment and consequently, the
scheduled webinars as previously
published in the Federal Register. An
updated schedule will be published
once the details are available.
Dated: June 26, 2017.
Jeffrey N. Lonergan,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–13662 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
Multistakeholder Process on Internet
of Things Security Upgradability and
Patching
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
The National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) will convene a
virtual meeting of a multistakeholder
process on Internet of Things Security
Upgradability and Patching on July 18,
2017. This is the fourth in a series of
meetings. For information on prior
meetings, see Web site address below.
DATES: The virtual meeting will be held
on July 18, 2017, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:30
p.m., Eastern Time. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for details.
SUMMARY:
This is a virtual meeting.
NTIA will post links to online content
and dial-in information on the
multistakeholder process Web site at
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/otherpublication/2016/multistakeholderprocess-iot-security.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allan Friedman, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room 4725, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482–4281;
email: afriedman@ntia.doc.gov. Please
direct media inquiries to NTIA’s Office
of Public Affairs: (202) 482–7002; email:
press@ntia.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: In March of 2015 the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration issued a
Request for Comment to ‘‘identify
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Jun 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
substantive cybersecurity issues that
affect the digital ecosystem and digital
economic growth where broad
consensus, coordinated action, and the
development of best practices could
substantially improve security for
organizations and consumers.’’ 1 We
received comments from a range of
stakeholders, including trade
associations, large companies,
cybersecurity startups, civil society
organizations and independent
computer security experts.2 The
comments recommended a diverse set of
issues that might be addressed through
the multistakeholder process, including
cybersecurity policy and practice in the
emerging area of Internet of Things
(IoT).
In a separate but related matter in
April 2016, NTIA, the Department’s
Internet Policy Task Force, and its
Digital Economy Leadership Team
sought comments on the benefits,
challenges, and potential roles for the
government in fostering the
advancement of the Internet of
Things.’’ 3 Over 130 stakeholders
responded with comments addressing
many substantive issues and
opportunities related to IoT.4 Security
was one of the most common topics
raised. Many commenters emphasized
the need for a secure lifecycle approach
to IoT devices that considers the
development, maintenance, and end-oflife phases and decisions for a device.
After reviewing these comments,
NTIA announced that the next
multistakeholder process on
cybersecurity would be on IoT security
upgradability and patching.5 The first
meeting of a multistakeholder process
on this topic was held on October 19,
1 U.S. Department of Commerce, Internet Policy
Task Force, Request for Public Comment,
Stakeholder Engagement on Cybersecurity in the
Digital Ecosystem, 80 FR 14360, Docket No.
150312253–5253–01 (Mar. 19, 2015), available at:
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/
cybersecurity_rfc_03192015.pdf.
2 NTIA has posted the public comments received
at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/
2015/comments-stakeholder-engagementcybersecurity-digital-ecosystem.
3 U.S. Department of Commerce, Internet Policy
Task Force, Request for Public Comment, Benefits,
Challenges, and Potential Roles for the Government
in Fostering the Advancement of the Internet of
Things, 81 FR 19956, Docket No 160331306–6306–
01 (April 5, 2016), available at: https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/2016/rfcpotential-roles-government-fostering-advancementinternet-of-things.
4 NTIA has posted the public comments received
at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/
2016/comments-potential-roles-governmentfostering-advancement-internet-of-things.
5 NTIA, Increasing the Potential of IoT through
Security and Transparency (Aug. 2, 2016), available
at: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2016/increasingpotential-iot-through-security-and-transparency.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29845
2016.6 A second, virtual meeting of this
process was held on January 31, 2017,7
and a third meeting was held on April
26, 2017.8
The matter of patching vulnerable
systems is now an accepted part of
cybersecurity.9 Unaddressed technical
flaws in systems leave the users of
software and systems at risk. The nature
of these risks varies, and mitigating
these risks requires various efforts from
the developers and owners of these
systems. One of the more common
means of mitigation is for the developer
or other maintaining party to issue a
security patch to address the
vulnerability. Patching has become
more commonly accepted, even for
consumers, as more operating systems
and applications shift to visible
reminders and automated updates. Yet
as one security expert notes, this
evolution of the software industry has
yet to become the dominant model in
IoT.10
To help realize the full innovative
potential of IoT, users need reasonable
assurance that connected devices,
embedded systems, and their
applications will be secure. A key part
of that security is the mitigation of
potential security vulnerabilities in IoT
devices or applications through
patching and security upgrades.
The ultimate objective of the
multistakeholder process is to foster a
market offering more devices and
systems that support security upgrades
through increased consumer awareness
and understanding. Enabling a thriving
market for patchable IoT requires
common definitions so that
manufacturers and solution providers
6 NTIA, Notice of Multistakeholder Process on
Internet of Things Security Upgradability and
Patching Open Meeting (Sept. 15, 2016), available
at: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/
2016/10192016-meeting-notice-msp-iot-securityupgradability-patching.
7 NTIA, Notice of Multistakeholder Process on
Internet of Things Security Upgradability and
Patching Open Meeting (April 11, 2017), available
at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/
2017/notice-04262017-meeting-multistakeholderprocess-internet-things.
8 NTIA, Notice of Multistakeholder Process on
Internet of Things Security Upgradability and
Patching Open Meeting (Sept. 15, 2016), available
at: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notice/
2016/10192016-meeting-notice-msp-iot-securityupgradability-patching.
9 See, e.g., Murugiah Souppaya and Karen
Scarfone, Guide to Enterprise Patch Management
Technologies, Special Publication 800–40 Revision
3, National Institute of Standards and Technology,
NIST SP 800–40 (2013) available at: https://
nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/
NIST.SP.800-40r3.pdf.
10 Bruce Schneier, The Internet of Things Is
Wildly Insecure—And Often Unpatchable, Wired
(Jan. 6, 2014), available at: https://
www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/01/security_
risks_9.html.
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 125 (Friday, June 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29844-29845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13662]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XF304
Fisheries of the South Atlantic; Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR); Public Meetings; Cancellation
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of change of schedule for SEDAR 56 South Atlantic Black
Sea Bass Assessment Webinars.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The SEDAR 56 assessment of the South Atlantic stock of black
seabass will consist of a series webinars. Due to changes to the
schedule for the stock assessment, webinars scheduled for Thursday,
July 20, 2017 and Wednesday, August 16, 2017 have been cancelled. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: This notice serves to cancel the previously scheduled July 20,
2017 and August 16, 2017 webinars.
ADDRESSES: SEDAR address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council,
4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC 29405;
www.sedarweb.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Byrd, SEDAR Coordinator, 4055
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 29405; phone: (843)
571-4366; email: julia.byrd@safmc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The original notice published in the Federal
Register on March 29, 2017 (82 FR 15495).
The Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery
Management Councils, in conjunction with NOAA Fisheries and the
Atlantic and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commissions, have implemented
the Southeast Data, Assessment and Review (SEDAR) process, a multi-step
method for determining the status of fish stocks in the Southeast
Region. The product of the SEDAR webinar series will be a report which
compiles and evaluates potential datasets and recommends which datasets
are appropriate for assessment analyses, and describes the fisheries,
evaluates the status of the stock, estimates biological benchmarks,
projects future population conditions, and recommends research and
monitoring needs. Participants for SEDAR Workshops are appointed by the
Gulf of Mexico, South Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils and NOAA Fisheries Southeast Regional Office, Highly Migratory
Species Management Division, and Southeast Fisheries Science Center.
Participants include: Data collectors and database managers; stock
assessment scientists, biologists, and researchers; constituency
representatives including fishermen, environmentalists, and non-
governmental organizations (NGOs); international experts; and staff of
Councils, Commissions, and state and federal agencies.
During its June 2017 meeting, the South Atlantic Fishery Management
[[Page 29845]]
Council made a decision to change the terminal year for the data used
on the stock assessment for the South Atlantic black sea bass stock.
The decision affects the schedule for the stock assessment and
consequently, the scheduled webinars as previously published in the
Federal Register. An updated schedule will be published once the
details are available.
Dated: June 26, 2017.
Jeffrey N. Lonergan,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National
marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-13662 Filed 6-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P