Special Local Regulation; Washburn Board Across the Bay, Lake Superior; Chequamegon Bay, WI, 29735-29736 [2017-13559]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 12, 2017.
Alan R. Hanson,
Acting Assistant Attorney General, Office of
Justice Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017–12984 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0169]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Washburn
Board Across the Bay, Lake Superior;
Chequamegon Bay, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will
establish a permanent special local
regulation on Lake Superior within
Chequamegon Bay for the annual
Washburn Board Across the Bay racing
event. This annual event historically
occurs within the last 2 weeks of July
and lasts for 1 day. This action is
necessary to safeguard the participants
and spectators on the water in a portion
of Chequamegon Bay between
Washburn, WI and Ashland, WI. This
regulation would functionally restrict
all vessel speeds while within a
designated no-wake zone, unless
otherwise specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Duluth or a
designated representative. The area
forming the subject of this permanent
special local regulation is described
below.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective July 31,
2017.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0169 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Junior Grade John Mack, Waterways
management, MSU Duluth, Coast Guard;
telephone 218–725–3818, email
John.V.Mack@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port, Duluth
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jun 29, 2017
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Jkt 241001
On March 30, 2017 the Coast Guard
published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (82 FR 15660) entitled ‘‘Special
Local Regulation; Washburn Board
Across the Bay, Lake Superior;
Chequamegon Bay, WI.’’ The NPRM
proposed to establish a no-wake zone
within Chequamegon Bay on an annual
basis during the Washburn Board
Across the Bay paddle craft event, and
invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this paddle
craft event. The aforementioned NPRM
was open for comment for 30 days in
which no comments were received.
III. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published on
March 30, 2017. There are no changes
in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM. This
rule will create a permanent special
local regulation in Chequamegon Bay
for the annual Washburn Board Across
the Bay racing event that historically
takes place in the third or fourth week
of July. The no-wake zone will be
enforced on all vessels entering into 100
yards of either side of an imaginary line
beginning in Washburn, WI at position
46°36′52″ N., 090°54′24″ W.; thence
southwest to position 46°38′44″ N.,
090°54′50″ W.; thence southeast to
position 46°37′02″ N., 090°50′20″ W.;
and ending southwest at position
46°36′12″ N., 090°51′51″ W. All vessels
transiting through the no-wake zone
will be required to travel at an
appropriate rate of speed that does not
create a wake except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative. The precise times and
date of enforcement for this special local
regulation will be determined annually.
The COTP, Duluth, will use all
appropriate means to notify the public
when the special local regulation in this
rule will be enforced. Such means may
include publication in the Federal
Register a Notice of Enforcement,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Local
Notice to Mariners. The regulatory text
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29735
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Planning
and Review’’) and 13563 (‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’)
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. Executive
Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’), directs
agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides
that ‘‘for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be
identified for elimination, and that the
cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a
budgeting process.’’
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has not designated this rule a
significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed it.
As this rule is not a significant
regulatory action, this rule is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-year of the Special Local
Regulation. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit through the no-wake zone
which will be 200 yards wide and will
impact only a small designated area of
Lake Superior in Chequamegon Bay
between Washburn, WI and Ashland,
WI during a time of year when
commercial vessel traffic is normally
low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will
issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
29736
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
no-wake zone may be small entities, for
the reasons stated in section V.A above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule will have a significant
economic impact on it, please submit a
comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining
why you think it qualifies and how and
to what degree this rule would
economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jun 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for Part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
■
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
§ 100. 169 Special Local Regulation;
Washburn Board Across the Bay, Lake
Superior; Chequamegon Bay, WI.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a nowake zone being enforced for no more
than 5 hours along a prescribed route
between Washburn & Ashland,
Wisconsin. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure
2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Add § 100. 169 to read as follows:
(a) Location. All waters of
Chequamegon Bay within 100 yards of
either side of an imaginary line
beginning in Washburn, WI at position
46°36′52″ N., 090°54′24″ W.; thence
southwest to position 46°38′44″ N.,
090°54′50″ W.; thence southeast to
position 46°37′02″ N., 090°50′20″ W.;
and ending southwest at position
46°36′12″ N., 090°51′51″ W.
(b) Effective period. This annual event
historically occurs within the third or
fourth week of July. The COTP, Duluth,
will announce enforcement dates via
Notice of Enforcement, Local Notice to
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
on-scene designated representatives, or
other forms of outreach.
(c) Regulations. Vessels transiting
within the regulated area shall travel at
a no-wake speed except as may be
permitted by the COTP, Duluth or a
designated on-scene representative.
Additionally, vessels shall yield rightof-way for event participants and event
safety craft and shall follow directions
given by event representatives during
the event.
Dated: May 26, 2017.
E.E. Williams,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2017–13559 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0470]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Swinomish Channel, Whitmarsh, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Northern
Santa Fe Railroad Company (BNSF)
Railroad Swing Span Drawbridge 12A
across Swinomish Channel, mile 8.4,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 125 (Friday, June 30, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29735-29736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13559]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2017-0169]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Washburn Board Across the Bay, Lake
Superior; Chequamegon Bay, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will establish a permanent special local
regulation on Lake Superior within Chequamegon Bay for the annual
Washburn Board Across the Bay racing event. This annual event
historically occurs within the last 2 weeks of July and lasts for 1
day. This action is necessary to safeguard the participants and
spectators on the water in a portion of Chequamegon Bay between
Washburn, WI and Ashland, WI. This regulation would functionally
restrict all vessel speeds while within a designated no-wake zone,
unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Duluth or a designated representative. The area forming the
subject of this permanent special local regulation is described below.
DATES: This rule is effective July 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0169 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade John Mack, Waterways
management, MSU Duluth, Coast Guard; telephone 218-725-3818, email
John.V.Mack@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port, Duluth
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On March 30, 2017 the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (82 FR 15660) entitled ``Special Local Regulation; Washburn
Board Across the Bay, Lake Superior; Chequamegon Bay, WI.'' The NPRM
proposed to establish a no-wake zone within Chequamegon Bay on an
annual basis during the Washburn Board Across the Bay paddle craft
event, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related
to this paddle craft event. The aforementioned NPRM was open for
comment for 30 days in which no comments were received.
III. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published on
March 30, 2017. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. This rule will create a
permanent special local regulation in Chequamegon Bay for the annual
Washburn Board Across the Bay racing event that historically takes
place in the third or fourth week of July. The no-wake zone will be
enforced on all vessels entering into 100 yards of either side of an
imaginary line beginning in Washburn, WI at position 46[deg]36'52'' N.,
090[deg]54'24'' W.; thence southwest to position 46[deg]38'44'' N.,
090[deg]54'50'' W.; thence southeast to position 46[deg]37'02'' N.,
090[deg]50'20'' W.; and ending southwest at position 46[deg]36'12'' N.,
090[deg]51'51'' W. All vessels transiting through the no-wake zone will
be required to travel at an appropriate rate of speed that does not
create a wake except as may be permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative. The precise times and date of enforcement for this
special local regulation will be determined annually.
The COTP, Duluth, will use all appropriate means to notify the
public when the special local regulation in this rule will be enforced.
Such means may include publication in the Federal Register a Notice of
Enforcement, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Local Notice to
Mariners. The regulatory text appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 13563
(``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies to
assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to reduce regulation
and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for
elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
not reviewed it.
As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-year of the Special Local Regulation.
Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit through the no-wake zone
which will be 200 yards wide and will impact only a small designated
area of Lake Superior in Chequamegon Bay between Washburn, WI and
Ashland, WI during a time of year when commercial vessel traffic is
normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
[[Page 29736]]
operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
through the no-wake zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule will have a
significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a no-wake zone being enforced for no
more than 5 hours along a prescribed route between Washburn & Ashland,
Wisconsin. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233
0
2. Add Sec. 100. 169 to read as follows:
Sec. 100. 169 Special Local Regulation; Washburn Board Across the
Bay, Lake Superior; Chequamegon Bay, WI.
(a) Location. All waters of Chequamegon Bay within 100 yards of
either side of an imaginary line beginning in Washburn, WI at position
46[deg]36'52'' N., 090[deg]54'24'' W.; thence southwest to position
46[deg]38'44'' N., 090[deg]54'50'' W.; thence southeast to position
46[deg]37'02'' N., 090[deg]50'20'' W.; and ending southwest at position
46[deg]36'12'' N., 090[deg]51'51'' W.
(b) Effective period. This annual event historically occurs within
the third or fourth week of July. The COTP, Duluth, will announce
enforcement dates via Notice of Enforcement, Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, on-scene designated representatives, or
other forms of outreach.
(c) Regulations. Vessels transiting within the regulated area shall
travel at a no-wake speed except as may be permitted by the COTP,
Duluth or a designated on-scene representative. Additionally, vessels
shall yield right-of-way for event participants and event safety craft
and shall follow directions given by event representatives during the
event.
Dated: May 26, 2017.
E.E. Williams,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2017-13559 Filed 6-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P