Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership-Amendments to the Terms and Schedule of Financial Assistance, 28994-28995 [2017-13423]
Download as PDF
28994
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
As of June 27, 2017, the special
conditions published on October 31,
2014, at 79 FR 64666, are withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara
Fitzgerald, ANE–112, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts,
01803–5213; telephone (781) 238–7130;
facsimile (781) 238–7199; email
Tara.Fitzgerald@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
On April 19, 2011, SNECMA, now
known as Safran Aircraft Engines (SAE)
applied for a new type certificate for the
Silvercrest-2 SC–2D engine model. At
that time, the Silvercrest-2 SC–2D
engine model was to have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared
to the state of technology described in
the airworthiness standards for aircraft
engines. The design feature included an
additional takeoff rating for the
Silvercrest-2 SC–2D engine model,
named ‘‘Rated 10-Minute One Engine
Inoperative Takeoff Thrust at High
Ambient Temperature’’ (Rated 10Minute OEI TOTHAT). It was intended
to maintain the takeoff thrust in certain
high ambient temperature conditions for
a maximum of 10 minutes with one
engine inoperative (OEI).
Reason for Withdrawal
The FAA is withdrawing Notice No.
33–014–01–SC because of concerns
raised over the sufficiency of the ‘‘Rated
10-Minute OEI TOTHAT’’ special
condition to meet the Automatic Takeoff
Thrust Control System (ATTCS) design
requirement specified in Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 25,
section I25.5(b)(2).
The proposed takeoff rating was for
use during OEI events that occur during
takeoff in high ambient temperature
conditions, up to 5 degrees Celsius
hotter than the rated takeoff corner
point. The assumptions for this rating
are no longer valid and the ‘‘Rated 10Minute OEI TOTHAT’’ is not needed.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Conclusion
This withdrawal does not preclude
the FAA from issuing another notice on
the subject matter in the future or
committing the agency to any future
course of action.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
June 13, 2017.
Carlos A. Pestana,
Acting Assistant Manager, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–12937 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Jun 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 33
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0376; Notice No. 33–
014–01–SC]
Special Conditions: SNECMA,
Silvercrest-2 SC–2D; Rated 10-Minute
One Engine Inoperative Takeoff Thrust
at High Ambient Temperature;
Withdrawal
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions,
withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The FAA is withdrawing
previously published special conditions
for the Silvercrest-2 SC–2D engine
model. We are requesting the
withdrawal because the ‘‘Rated 10Minute One Engine Inoperative Takeoff
Thrust at High Ambient Temperature
(Rated 10-Minute OEI TOTHAT) is not
needed.
DATES: As of June 27, 2017, the special
conditions published on October 31,
2014 at 79 FR 64666, are withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara
Fitzgerald, ANE–112, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts,
01803–5213; telephone (781) 238–7130;
facsimile (781) 238–7199; email
Tara.Fitzgerald@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On April 19, 2011, SNECMA, now
known as Safran Aircraft Engines (SAE)
applied for a new type certificate for the
Silvercrest-2 SC–2D engine model. At
that time, the Silvercrest-2 SC–2D
engine model was to have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared
to the state of technology described in
the airworthiness standards for aircraft
engines. The design feature included an
additional takeoff rating for the
Silvercrest-2 SC–2D engine model,
named ‘‘Rated 10-Minute One Engine
Inoperative Takeoff Thrust at High
Ambient Temperature’’ (Rated 10Minute OEI TOTHAT). It was intended
to maintain the takeoff thrust in certain
high ambient temperature conditions for
a maximum of 10 minutes with one
engine inoperative (OEI).
Reason for Withdrawal
The FAA is withdrawing Notice No.
33–014–01–SC because of concerns
raised over the sufficiency of the ‘‘Rated
10-Minute OEI TOTHAT’’ special
condition to meet the Automatic Takeoff
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Thrust Control System (ATTCS) design
requirement specified in Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 25,
section I25.5(b)(2).
The proposed takeoff rating was for
use during OEI events that occur during
takeoff in high ambient temperature
conditions, up to 5 degrees Celsius
hotter than the rated takeoff corner
point. The assumptions for this rating
are no longer valid and the ‘‘Rated 10Minute OEI TOTHAT’’ is not needed.
Conclusion
This withdrawal does not preclude
the FAA from issuing another notice on
the subject matter in the future or
committing the agency to any future
course of action.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
June 13, 2017.
Carlos A. Pestana,
Acting Assistant Manager, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–12939 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institutes of Standards and
Technology
15 CFR Part 290
[Docket No.: 170526519–7519–01]
RIN 0693–AB64
Hollings Manufacturing Extension
Partnership—Amendments to the
Terms and Schedule of Financial
Assistance
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), United States
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NIST is issuing a final rule to
amend the regulations governing the
Hollings Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP) program to reflect the
current cost sharing requirements for
cooperative agreements for the
establishment and operation of MEP
Centers, consistent with recent
amendments to the MEP authorizing
statute. Under the revised statute, NIST
may provide up to 50 percent of the
capital and annual operating and
maintenance funds required to establish
and support an MEP Center. The
regulations are also being amended to
remove other cost sharing rules that are
not required by the MEP authorizing
statute or current program policies.
DATES: This rule is effective June 27,
2017.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne-Louise Marquis, at (301) 975–3944
or anne-louise.marquis@nist.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Hollings MEP Program (Program)
is a unique program, consisting of
centers in each state and Puerto Rico
with partnerships at the state, federal,
and local levels. Prior to being amended
by Section 501(b) of the American
Innovation and Competitiveness Act
(AICA), Public Law 114–329, the
Program statute, 15 U.S.C. 278k,
required that NIST provide less than 50
percent of the capital and annual
operating and maintenance funds of an
MEP Center beginning in the fourth year
of a cooperative agreement. The revised
statute allows NIST to provide up to 50
percent of the capital and annual
operating and maintenance funds
required to establish and support an
MEP Center. NIST is amending the MEP
regulations, specifically 15 CFR 290.4,
to implement the revised statute and to
eliminate certain limitations on the
amounts and sources of MEP Center cost
share that are not required by 15 U.S.C.
278k and that do not reflect current
MEP Program cost sharing policies.
II. Statutory Authority
NIST is revising 15 CFR 290.4 to
ensure it is fully consistent with recent
statutory changes to 15 U.S.C. 278k(e)(2)
made by section 501(b) of AICA, and to
ensure that the cost sharing
requirements in 15 CFR 290.4 are
consistent with the cost sharing
requirements for financial assistance
awards contained in 2 CFR part 200 and
with current MEP Program cost sharing
policies.
III. Regulatory Analysis
Because this final rule is a matter
relating to public property, loans,
grants, benefits, or contracts, 5 U.S.C.
553 does not apply. See 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2). Therefore, prior notice and
opportunity for public comment are not
required under 5 U.S.C. 553, and there
is no requirement for a 30-day delay in
the effectiveness of this action under 5
U.S.C. 553(d).
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
This final rule was determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This final rule does not contain
policies with Federalism implications as
defined in Executive Order 13132.
15:07 Jun 26, 2017
Because prior notice and opportunity
for public comment are not required for
this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other
law, the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., do not apply.
SUMMARY:
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
This final rule will not significantly
affect the quality of the human
environment. Therefore, an
environmental assessment or
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required to be prepared under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 290
Grant programs, Science and
technology, Cooperative agreements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, NIST is amending 15 CFR
part 290 as follows:
PART 290—REGIONAL CENTERS FOR
THE TRANSFER OF MANUFACTURING
TECHNOLOGY
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 290 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 278k.
■
2. Revise § 290.4 to read as follows:
§ 290.4 Terms and schedule of financial
assistance.
The Secretary may provide up to 50
percent of the capital and annual
operating and maintenance funds
required to establish and support an
MEP Center.
Phillip A. Singerman,
Associate Director for Innovations and
Industry Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–13423 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Executive Order 12866
VerDate Sep<11>2014
ACTION:
Jkt 241001
28995
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0473]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Cerritos Channel, Long Beach, CA
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Coast Guard, DHS.
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Final rule.
The Coast Guard is removing
the operating schedule that governs the
Commodore Schuyler F. Heim highway
bridge, mile 4.9, across the Cerritos
Channel, at Long Beach, California. The
drawbridge has been removed from the
waterway making the operating
regulation no longer necessary.
DATES: This rule is effective June 27,
2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type [USCG–
2017–0473]. In the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and
click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District;
telephone 510–437–3516, email
Carl.T.Hausner@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this final
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM
with respect to this rule because the
Commodore Schuyler F. Heim highway
bridge, that once required draw
operations in 33 CFR 117.147(a), has
been removed from the waterway.
Therefore, the regulation is no longer
necessary or applicable and shall be
removed from publication. It is
unnecessary to publish an NPRM
because this regulatory action does not
purport to place any restrictions on
mariners but rather removes restrictions
that have no further use or value.
We are issuing this rule under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 27, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28994-28995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13423]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institutes of Standards and Technology
15 CFR Part 290
[Docket No.: 170526519-7519-01]
RIN 0693-AB64
Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership--Amendments to the
Terms and Schedule of Financial Assistance
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), United
States Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NIST is issuing a final rule to amend the regulations
governing the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP)
program to reflect the current cost sharing requirements for
cooperative agreements for the establishment and operation of MEP
Centers, consistent with recent amendments to the MEP authorizing
statute. Under the revised statute, NIST may provide up to 50 percent
of the capital and annual operating and maintenance funds required to
establish and support an MEP Center. The regulations are also being
amended to remove other cost sharing rules that are not required by the
MEP authorizing statute or current program policies.
DATES: This rule is effective June 27, 2017.
[[Page 28995]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne-Louise Marquis, at (301) 975-3944
or anne-louise.marquis@nist.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Hollings MEP Program (Program) is a unique program, consisting
of centers in each state and Puerto Rico with partnerships at the
state, federal, and local levels. Prior to being amended by Section
501(b) of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (AICA),
Public Law 114-329, the Program statute, 15 U.S.C. 278k, required that
NIST provide less than 50 percent of the capital and annual operating
and maintenance funds of an MEP Center beginning in the fourth year of
a cooperative agreement. The revised statute allows NIST to provide up
to 50 percent of the capital and annual operating and maintenance funds
required to establish and support an MEP Center. NIST is amending the
MEP regulations, specifically 15 CFR 290.4, to implement the revised
statute and to eliminate certain limitations on the amounts and sources
of MEP Center cost share that are not required by 15 U.S.C. 278k and
that do not reflect current MEP Program cost sharing policies.
II. Statutory Authority
NIST is revising 15 CFR 290.4 to ensure it is fully consistent with
recent statutory changes to 15 U.S.C. 278k(e)(2) made by section 501(b)
of AICA, and to ensure that the cost sharing requirements in 15 CFR
290.4 are consistent with the cost sharing requirements for financial
assistance awards contained in 2 CFR part 200 and with current MEP
Program cost sharing policies.
III. Regulatory Analysis
Because this final rule is a matter relating to public property,
loans, grants, benefits, or contracts, 5 U.S.C. 553 does not apply. See
5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). Therefore, prior notice and opportunity for public
comment are not required under 5 U.S.C. 553, and there is no
requirement for a 30-day delay in the effectiveness of this action
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
Executive Order 12866
This final rule was determined to be not significant for purposes
of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This final rule does not contain policies with Federalism
implications as defined in Executive Order 13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because prior notice and opportunity for public comment are not
required for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new collection of information
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
This final rule will not significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. Therefore, an environmental assessment or
Environmental Impact Statement is not required to be prepared under the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 290
Grant programs, Science and technology, Cooperative agreements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, NIST is amending 15 CFR
part 290 as follows:
PART 290--REGIONAL CENTERS FOR THE TRANSFER OF MANUFACTURING
TECHNOLOGY
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 290 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 278k.
0
2. Revise Sec. 290.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 290.4 Terms and schedule of financial assistance.
The Secretary may provide up to 50 percent of the capital and
annual operating and maintenance funds required to establish and
support an MEP Center.
Phillip A. Singerman,
Associate Director for Innovations and Industry Services.
[FR Doc. 2017-13423 Filed 6-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P