Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, 28538-28540 [2017-13053]

Download as PDF sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 28538 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2017 / Notices 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in NRC’s electronic hearing docket, which is available to the public at https:// adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission or the presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate as described above, click cancel when the link requests certificates and you will be automatically directed to the NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where you will be able to access any publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. For example, in some instances, individuals provide home addresses in order to demonstrate proximity to a facility or site. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. The Commission will issue a Notice or Order granting or denying a hearing request or intervention petition, designating the issues for any hearing that will be held and designating the Presiding Officer. A notice granting a hearing will be published in the Federal Register and served on the parties to the hearing. If a person (other than Tilden Mining) requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Jun 21, 2017 Jkt 241001 by this Confirmatory Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f). If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any hearings. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be sustained. In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section V above shall be final 30 days from the date of this Confirmatory Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section V shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Dated this 14th day of June 2017. Cynthia D. Pederson Regional Administrator, NRC Region III. [FR Doc. 2017–13000 Filed 6–21–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50–289 and 50–320; NRC– 2017–0146] Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–50 held by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) for the operation of Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (TMI), Units 1 and 2, located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania. The proposed amendment would allow for changes to TMI’s Radiological Emergency Plan Annex staffing levels to align with Exelon’s standard fleet Emergency Response Organization (ERO) framework. In accordance with the Possession-Only License No. DPR– 73 Post-Defueling Monitored Storage Safety Analysis Report for TMI, Unit 2, the emergency plan for Unit 1 is considered to encompass Unit 2. Therefore, an amendment to the Unit 2 license is not required. The NRC is SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 issuing an environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) associated with the proposed license amendment. DATES: The EA referenced in this document is available on June 22, 2017. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2017–0146 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2017–0146. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this document. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin C. Poole, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–2048; email: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The NRC is considering issuance of a license amendment pursuant to section 50.54 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Conditions of licenses,’’ paragraph (q), ‘‘Emergency plans,’’ to Renewed Facility Operating License No DPR–50 held by Exelon for the operation of TMI, Units 1 and 2, located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC performed the following EA that analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2017 / Notices licensing action. Based on the results of this EA, and in accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed licensing action, and is issuing a FONSI. II. Environmental Assessment Description of the Proposed Action The proposed action would revise the Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for TMI in order to allow changes to staffing levels to align with Exelon’s standard fleet ERO framework. The proposed changes would decrease the on-shift radiation protection technician staffing from three to two technicians. The proposed amendment would also make changes to the staffing of on-shift maintenance personnel. Specifically, the amendment would: (1) Revise the on-shift position of operations support center director (renamed repair team lead) to remove the requirement that the position be from the maintenance organization; (2) remove two dedicated maintenance technicians from the onshift staffing total; and (3) remove two additional personnel from the repair and corrective actions major task and assign them to respond within 60 minutes, as well as one additional staff person to respond within 90 minutes. The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee’s application dated July 15, 2016 (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML16201A306), as supplemented by letter dated February 13, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17045A036). sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Need for the Proposed Action Nuclear power plant owners, government agencies, and state and local officials work together to create a system for emergency preparedness and response that will serve the public in the unlikely event of an emergency. An effective emergency preparedness program decreases the likelihood of an initiating event at a nuclear power reactor proceeding to a severe accident. Emergency preparedness cannot affect the probability of the initiating event, but a high level of emergency preparedness increases the probability of accident mitigation if the initiating event proceeds beyond the need for initial operator actions. Each licensee is required to establish emergency plans to be implemented in the event of an accident. These emergency plans, in part, cover preparations for evacuation, sheltering, and other actions to protect individuals near plants in the event of an accident. The NRC, as well as other Federal and state regulatory agencies, reviews VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:08 Jun 21, 2017 Jkt 241001 emergency plans to ensure that the condition of emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency. Separate from this environmental assessment, the NRC staff is performing a safety assessment of Exelon’s proposed changes to the emergency plan for TMI. This safety review will be documented in a safety evaluation report. The safety evaluation report will determine whether, with the proposed changes to the emergency plan for TMI, there continues to be reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency at TMI, in accordance with the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in appendix E to 10 CFR part 50. The proposed action is needed to align TMI’s Radiological Emergency Plan Annex staffing levels with Exelon’s standard fleet ERO framework. This will improve consistency throughout the Exelon fleet regarding the application of operating experience and process improvements from other Exelon fleet sites and will provide flexibility in staffing ERO positions with qualified personnel from either the operations or maintenance organizations. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff has completed its evaluation of the environmental impacts of the proposed action. The proposed action consists mainly of administrative changes related to the staffing levels and positions of the TMI emergency plan. These changes include (a) decreasing radiation protection technician staffing from three to two technicians, (b) renaming the on-shift ‘‘operations support center director’’ to ‘‘repair team lead’’ and removing the requirement that the position be filled by a ‘‘maintenance team lead,’’ (c) removing two dedicated maintenance technicians from the on-shift staffing total, (d) removing one Mechanical and one Electrical/Instrumentation and Control Maintenance Technician assigned concurrent duties, and (e) adding one Mechanical Maintenance Technician and one Electrical Maintenance Technician as 60-minute augmentation responders and one Maintenance Instrumentation and Control Technician as a 90-minute augmentation responder. With regard to potential nonradiological environmental impacts, the proposed changes would have no direct impacts on land use or water resources, including terrestrial and aquatic biota, PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28539 as they involve no new construction or modification of plant operational systems. There would be no changes to the quality or quantity of nonradiological effluents and no changes to the plant’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit are needed. Changes in staffing levels could result in minor changes in vehicular traffic and associated air pollutant emissions, but no significant changes in ambient air quality would be expected from the proposed changes. In addition, there would be no noticeable effect on socioeconomic conditions in the region, no environment justice impacts, and no impacts to historic and cultural resources from the proposed changes. Therefore, there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. With regard to potential radiological environmental impacts, if the NRC staff’s safety review of the proposed changes to the TMI emergency plan determines that, with the proposed changes, the emergency plan continues to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in appendix E to 10 CFR part 50, then the proposed action would not increase the probability or consequences of radiological accidents. Additionally, the NRC staff has concluded that the proposed changes would have no direct radiological environmental impacts. There would be no change to the types or amounts of radioactive effluents that may be released and, therefore, no change in occupational or public radiation exposure from the proposed changes. Moreover, no changes would be made to plant buildings or the site property from the proposed changes. Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in current environmental impacts. Accordingly, the environmental impacts of the proposed action and the no-action alternative are similar. Alternative Use of Resources The proposed action does not involve the use of any different resources than those previously considered. Agencies and Persons Consulted No additional agencies or persons were consulted regarding the E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 28540 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 119 / Thursday, June 22, 2017 / Notices environmental impact of the proposed action. III. Finding of No Significant Impact Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(q), the licensee has requested a license amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–50 for the operation of TMI to allow staffing changes to the Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for TMI. The NRC is considering issuing the requested amendment. On the basis of the EA included in Section II of this document and incorporated by reference into this finding, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. The related environmental document is NUREG–1437, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 37, Regarding Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Final Report,’’ and is available for public inspection at ADAMS Accession No. ML091751063. NUREG–1437, Supplement 37, provides the latest environmental review of current operations and a description of environmental conditions at TMI. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of June 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Booma Venkataraman, Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2017–13053 Filed 6–21–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. CP2017–214] New Postal Products Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing for the Commission’s consideration concerning rates not of general applicability for Inbound Parcel Post (at Universal Postal Union (UPU) Rates). This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: June 26, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:08 Jun 21, 2017 Jkt 241001 www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Application for Non-Public Treatment; Filing Acceptance Date: June 16, 2017; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3633 and 39 CFR 3015.5; Public Representative: Katalin K. Clendenin; Comments Due: June 26, 2017. This Notice will be published in the Federal Register. David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Stacy L. Ruble, Secretary. Table of Contents [FR Doc. 2017–13069 Filed 6–21–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P I. Introduction II. Docketed Proceeding(s) I. Introduction The Commission gives notice that the Postal Service filed request(s) for the Commission to consider matters related to rates not of general applicability for Inbound Parcel Post (at Universal Postal Union (UPU) Rates). Section II identifies the docket number(s) associated with each Postal Service request, the title of each Postal Service request, the request’s acceptance date, and the authority cited by the Postal Service for each request. For each request, the Commission appoints an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 (Public Representative). Section II also establishes comment deadline(s) pertaining to each request. The public portions of the Postal Service’s request(s) can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, can be accessed through compliance with the requirements of 39 CFR 3007.40. The Commission invites comments on whether the Postal Service’s request(s) in the captioned docket(s) are consistent with the policies of title 39. For request(s) that the Postal Service states concern market dominant product(s), applicable statutory and regulatory requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s) that the Postal Service states concern competitive product(s), applicable statutory and regulatory requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment deadline(s) for each request appear in section II. II. Docketed Proceeding(s) Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Release No. 34–80952; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2017–059] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Rule 6896 and Chapter IX, Section 9 June 16, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on June 8, 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 6896 and Chapter IX, Section 9 (Consolidated Audit Trail—Fee Dispute Resolution) to establish the procedures for resolving potential disputes related to CAT Fees charged to Industry Members.3 The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. 1 15 1. Docket No(s).: CP2017–214; Filing Title: Notice of the United States Postal Service of Filing Changes in Rates Not of General Applicability for Inbound Parcel Post (at UPU Rates), and PO 00000 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms used in this rule filing are defined as set forth herein, or in the Consolidated Audit Trail Funding Fees Rule, the CAT Compliance Rule Series or in the CAT NMS Plan. 2 17 E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 119 (Thursday, June 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28538-28540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-289 and 50-320; NRC-2017-0146]


Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Three Mile Island Nuclear 
Station, Units 1 and 2

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; 
issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering 
issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-
50 held by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) for 
the operation of Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (TMI), Units 1 and 
2, located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania. The proposed amendment 
would allow for changes to TMI's Radiological Emergency Plan Annex 
staffing levels to align with Exelon's standard fleet Emergency 
Response Organization (ERO) framework. In accordance with the 
Possession-Only License No. DPR-73 Post-Defueling Monitored Storage 
Safety Analysis Report for TMI, Unit 2, the emergency plan for Unit 1 
is considered to encompass Unit 2. Therefore, an amendment to the Unit 
2 license is not required. The NRC is issuing an environmental 
assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) associated 
with the proposed license amendment.

DATES: The EA referenced in this document is available on June 22, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0146 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0146. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available 
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this 
document.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin C. Poole, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2048; email: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction

    The NRC is considering issuance of a license amendment pursuant to 
section 50.54 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), 
``Conditions of licenses,'' paragraph (q), ``Emergency plans,'' to 
Renewed Facility Operating License No DPR-50 held by Exelon for the 
operation of TMI, Units 1 and 2, located in Dauphin County, 
Pennsylvania. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC performed the 
following EA that analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed

[[Page 28539]]

licensing action. Based on the results of this EA, and in accordance 
with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the NRC has determined not to prepare an 
environmental impact statement for the proposed licensing action, and 
is issuing a FONSI.

II. Environmental Assessment

Description of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would revise the Radiological Emergency Plan 
Annex for TMI in order to allow changes to staffing levels to align 
with Exelon's standard fleet ERO framework. The proposed changes would 
decrease the on-shift radiation protection technician staffing from 
three to two technicians. The proposed amendment would also make 
changes to the staffing of on-shift maintenance personnel. 
Specifically, the amendment would: (1) Revise the on-shift position of 
operations support center director (renamed repair team lead) to remove 
the requirement that the position be from the maintenance organization; 
(2) remove two dedicated maintenance technicians from the on-shift 
staffing total; and (3) remove two additional personnel from the repair 
and corrective actions major task and assign them to respond within 60 
minutes, as well as one additional staff person to respond within 90 
minutes.
    The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
application dated July 15, 2016 (ADAMS Package Accession No. 
ML16201A306), as supplemented by letter dated February 13, 2017 (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML17045A036).

Need for the Proposed Action

    Nuclear power plant owners, government agencies, and state and 
local officials work together to create a system for emergency 
preparedness and response that will serve the public in the unlikely 
event of an emergency. An effective emergency preparedness program 
decreases the likelihood of an initiating event at a nuclear power 
reactor proceeding to a severe accident. Emergency preparedness cannot 
affect the probability of the initiating event, but a high level of 
emergency preparedness increases the probability of accident mitigation 
if the initiating event proceeds beyond the need for initial operator 
actions.
    Each licensee is required to establish emergency plans to be 
implemented in the event of an accident. These emergency plans, in 
part, cover preparations for evacuation, sheltering, and other actions 
to protect individuals near plants in the event of an accident.
    The NRC, as well as other Federal and state regulatory agencies, 
reviews emergency plans to ensure that the condition of emergency 
preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective 
measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological 
emergency.
    Separate from this environmental assessment, the NRC staff is 
performing a safety assessment of Exelon's proposed changes to the 
emergency plan for TMI. This safety review will be documented in a 
safety evaluation report. The safety evaluation report will determine 
whether, with the proposed changes to the emergency plan for TMI, there 
continues to be reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures 
can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency at TMI, 
in accordance with the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the 
requirements in appendix E to 10 CFR part 50.
    The proposed action is needed to align TMI's Radiological Emergency 
Plan Annex staffing levels with Exelon's standard fleet ERO framework. 
This will improve consistency throughout the Exelon fleet regarding the 
application of operating experience and process improvements from other 
Exelon fleet sites and will provide flexibility in staffing ERO 
positions with qualified personnel from either the operations or 
maintenance organizations.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC staff has completed its evaluation of the environmental 
impacts of the proposed action.
    The proposed action consists mainly of administrative changes 
related to the staffing levels and positions of the TMI emergency plan. 
These changes include (a) decreasing radiation protection technician 
staffing from three to two technicians, (b) renaming the on-shift 
``operations support center director'' to ``repair team lead'' and 
removing the requirement that the position be filled by a ``maintenance 
team lead,'' (c) removing two dedicated maintenance technicians from 
the on-shift staffing total, (d) removing one Mechanical and one 
Electrical/Instrumentation and Control Maintenance Technician assigned 
concurrent duties, and (e) adding one Mechanical Maintenance Technician 
and one Electrical Maintenance Technician as 60-minute augmentation 
responders and one Maintenance Instrumentation and Control Technician 
as a 90-minute augmentation responder.
    With regard to potential non-radiological environmental impacts, 
the proposed changes would have no direct impacts on land use or water 
resources, including terrestrial and aquatic biota, as they involve no 
new construction or modification of plant operational systems. There 
would be no changes to the quality or quantity of non-radiological 
effluents and no changes to the plant's National Pollutant Discharge 
Elimination System permit are needed. Changes in staffing levels could 
result in minor changes in vehicular traffic and associated air 
pollutant emissions, but no significant changes in ambient air quality 
would be expected from the proposed changes. In addition, there would 
be no noticeable effect on socioeconomic conditions in the region, no 
environment justice impacts, and no impacts to historic and cultural 
resources from the proposed changes. Therefore, there are no 
significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the 
proposed action.
    With regard to potential radiological environmental impacts, if the 
NRC staff's safety review of the proposed changes to the TMI emergency 
plan determines that, with the proposed changes, the emergency plan 
continues to meet the standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements 
in appendix E to 10 CFR part 50, then the proposed action would not 
increase the probability or consequences of radiological accidents. 
Additionally, the NRC staff has concluded that the proposed changes 
would have no direct radiological environmental impacts. There would be 
no change to the types or amounts of radioactive effluents that may be 
released and, therefore, no change in occupational or public radiation 
exposure from the proposed changes. Moreover, no changes would be made 
to plant buildings or the site property from the proposed changes. 
Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
associated with the proposed action.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered 
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in 
current environmental impacts. Accordingly, the environmental impacts 
of the proposed action and the no-action alternative are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

    The proposed action does not involve the use of any different 
resources than those previously considered.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    No additional agencies or persons were consulted regarding the

[[Page 28540]]

environmental impact of the proposed action.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(q), the licensee has requested a license 
amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-50 for the 
operation of TMI to allow staffing changes to the Radiological 
Emergency Plan Annex for TMI. The NRC is considering issuing the 
requested amendment. On the basis of the EA included in Section II of 
this document and incorporated by reference into this finding, the NRC 
concludes that the proposed action would not have a significant effect 
on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has 
determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
proposed action.
    The related environmental document is NUREG-1437, ``Generic 
Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, 
Supplement 37, Regarding Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, 
Final Report,'' and is available for public inspection at ADAMS 
Accession No. ML091751063. NUREG-1437, Supplement 37, provides the 
latest environmental review of current operations and a description of 
environmental conditions at TMI.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of June 2017.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Booma Venkataraman,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I, Division of Operating 
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2017-13053 Filed 6-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.