Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides for the 2017 Compliance Year, 28243-28244 [2017-12967]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 19, 2016.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
(1) Regulation 1, Rule 2,
‘‘Definitions,’’ Rev. Adopted and
Effective on June 30, 1999, Table 1—
Exempt Compounds: Rev. and Effective
on June 14, 2016.
(2) [Reserved]
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Note: This document was received for
publication by the Office of the Federal
Register on June 12, 2017.
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
[FR Doc. 2017–12475 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(242)(i)(A)(2),
(c)(379)(i)(B)(2), (c)(485)(B), (c)(487),
and (c)(488) to read as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 52.220
[FRL–9963–26–OAR]
■
Identification of plan—in part.
*
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 97
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(242) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on August 17,
1998 in paragraph (c)(242)(i)(A)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph (c)(485)(B)(1),
Rule 1118, adopted on October 28, 1996.
*
*
*
*
*
(379) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on September
17, 2010 in paragraph (c)(379)(i)(B)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(488)(i)(A)(1), Rule 2, ‘‘Definitions,’’
Rev. Adopted and Effective on June 30,
1999, Table 1—Exempt Compounds:
Rev. and Effective on November 4, 2009
*
*
*
*
*
(485) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 1118, ‘‘Aerospace Assembly,
Rework and Component Manufacturing
Operations,’’ amended on October 26,
2015.
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(487) New and amended regulations
were submitted on September 6, 2016
by the Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Northern Sierra Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 513, ‘‘Emissions Statements
and Recordkeeping,’’ amended on June
27, 2016.
(2) [Reserved]
(488) New and amended regulations
were submitted on April 21, 2016 by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Jun 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
Allocations of Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule Allowances From New
Unit Set-Asides for the 2017
Compliance Year
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of data availability
(NODA).
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the
availability of data on emission
allowance allocations to certain units
under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR). EPA has completed
preliminary calculations for the first
round of allocations of allowances from
the CSAPR new unit set-asides (NUSAs)
for the 2017 control periods and has
posted spreadsheets containing the
calculations on EPA’s Web site. EPA
will consider timely objections to the
preliminary calculations (including
objections concerning the identification
of units eligible for allocations) and will
promulgate a notice responding to any
such objections no later than August 1,
2017, the deadline for recording the
first-round allocations in sources’
Allowance Management System
accounts.
SUMMARY:
Objections to the information
referenced in this notice must be
received on or before July 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via
email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov.
Include ‘‘2017 NUSA allocations’’ in the
email subject line and include your
name, title, affiliation, address, phone
number, and email address in the body
of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning this action should
be addressed to Robert Miller at (202)
343–9077 or miller.robertl@epa.gov or
Kenon Smith at (202) 343–9164 or
smith.kenon@epa.gov.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28243
Under
each CSAPR trading program where
EPA is responsible for determining
emission allowance allocations, a
portion of each state’s emissions budget
for the program for each control period
is reserved in a NUSA (and in an
additional Indian country NUSA in the
case of states with Indian country
within their borders) for allocation to
certain units that would not otherwise
receive allowance allocations. The
procedures for annually allocating
allowances from each NUSA to eligible
units are set forth in the CSAPR
regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and
97.412 (NOX Annual Trading Program),
97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone
Season Group 1 Trading Program),
97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1
Trading Program), 97.711(b) and 97.712
(SO2 Group 2 Trading Program), and
97.811(b) and 97.812 (NOX Ozone
Season Group 2 Trading Program). Each
NUSA allowance allocation process
involves up to two rounds of allocations
to eligible units, termed ‘‘new’’ units,
followed by the allocation to ‘‘existing’’
units of any allowances not allocated to
new units.
This notice concerns preliminary
calculations for the first round of NUSA
allowance allocations for the 2017
control periods. Generally, the
allocation procedures call for each
eligible unit to receive a first-round
2017 NUSA allocation equal to its 2016
emissions as reported under 40 CFR part
75 unless the total of such allocations to
all eligible units would exceed the
amount of allowances in the NUSA, in
which case the allocations are reduced
on a pro-rata basis.
The detailed unit-by-unit data and
preliminary allowance allocation
calculations are set forth in Excel
spreadsheets titled ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_
2017_NOX_Annual_1st_Round_Prelim_
Data’’, ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2017_NOX_OS_
1st_Round_Prelim_Data’’, and ‘‘CSAPR_
NUSA_2017_SO2_1st_Round_Prelim_
Data,’’ available on EPA’s Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/csapr/new-unitset-aside-notices-data-availability-nusanoda-cross-state-air-pollution-rule. Each
of the spreadsheets contains a separate
worksheet for each state covered by that
program showing, for each unit
identified as eligible for a first-round
NUSA allocation, (1) the unit’s
emissions in the 2016 control period
(annual or ozone season as applicable),
(2) the maximum first-round 2017
NUSA allowance allocation for which
the unit is eligible (typically the unit’s
emissions in the 2016 control period),
(3) various adjustments to the unit’s
maximum allocation, many of which are
necessary only if the NUSA pool is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
28244
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
oversubscribed, and (4) the preliminary
calculation of the unit’s first-round 2017
NUSA allowance allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a
summary showing (1) the quantity of
allowances initially available in that
state’s 2017 NUSA, (2) the sum of the
first-round 2017 NUSA allowance
allocations that will be made to new
units in that state, assuming there are no
corrections to the data, and (3) the
quantity of allowances that would
remain in the 2017 NUSA for use in
second-round allocations to new units
(or ultimately for allocation to existing
units), again assuming there are no
corrections to the data.
Objections should be strictly limited
to the data and calculations upon which
the NUSA allowance allocations are
based and should be emailed to the
address identified in ADDRESSES.
Objections must include: (1) Precise
identification of the specific data and/or
calculations the commenter believes are
inaccurate, (2) new proposed data and/
or calculations upon which the
commenter believes EPA should rely
instead to determine allowance
allocations, and (3) the reasons why
EPA should rely on the commenter’s
proposed data and/or calculations and
not the data referenced in this notice.
EPA notes that an allocation or lack
of allocation of allowances to a given
unit does not constitute a determination
that CSAPR does or does not apply to
the unit. EPA also notes that allocations
are subject to potential correction.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b),
97.611(b), 97.711(b), and 97.811(b).
Dated: May 22, 2017.
Richard A. Haeuber,
Acting Director, Clean Air Markets Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of
Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2017–12967 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket No. 02–60; FCC 17–71]
Rural Health Care Support Mechanism
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) amends the Rural Health
Care (RHC) Program rule which defines
‘‘health care provider’’ to implement the
provision of the Rural Healthcare
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Jun 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
Connectivity Act of 2016 amending the
Communications Act of 1934 (the Act)
to include skilled nursing facilities
(SNFs) amongst the list of health care
providers eligible to receive support.
DATES: Effective June 21, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Brown, regina.brown@fcc.gov,
Telecommunications Access Policy
Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
(202) 418–0792 or TTY: (202) 418–0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order
(MO&O) in WC Docket No. 02–60; FCC
17–71, adopted on June 7, 2017, and
released on June 8, 2017. The full text
of this document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or at the
following Internet address: https://
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/
FCC-17-71A1.pdf.
I. Discussion
1. In this MO&O, we implement the
Rural Healthcare Connectivity Act of
2016, which amends section
254(h)(7)(B) of the Act, to include SNFs
amongst the list of health care providers
eligible to receive RHC Program
support. Specifically, we amend
§ 54.600(a) of the Commission’s rules
defining ‘‘health care provider’’ under
the RHC Program to include SNFs as
eligible health care providers.
2. In the 1996 Act, Congress limited
the types of health care providers
eligible to receive support. SNFs were
not included as an eligible entity type.
Following the 1996 Act, the
Commission established the RHC
Program implementing the provisions of
the 1996 Act and adopting rules for the
program, including § 54.600(a) of the
Commission’s rules, which defines
‘‘health care provider[s]’’ supported
under our RHC support programs in a
manner that mirrored the terms of
section 254(h)(7)(B) of the Act. This
definition did not include SNFs.
3. On June 22, 2016, the President
signed legislation that included SNFs
amongst the list of health care providers
eligible to receive RHC Program
support. We interpret this law as
directing the Commission to include
SNFs in all programs for which health
care providers are otherwise eligible and
therefore amend § 54.600(a) of the
Commission’s rules defining ‘‘health
care provider’’ under the RHC Program
to mirror the current statutory definition
in 47 U.S.C. 254(h)(7)(B). We find that
a notice and comment rule making
proceeding in this matter is unnecessary
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
because the rule modification flows
from the direction provided in the Rural
Healthcare Connectivity Act of 2016 to
include SNFs within the existing RHC
Program. Section 1.412(c) of the
Commission’s rules provides that rule
changes may be adopted without prior
notice where the Commission for good
cause finds that notice and comment
procedures are unnecessary, so long as
the basis for the good cause finding is
published with the rule changes. The
final rule adopted in this MO&O does
not involve discretionary action on our
part, but rather simply effectuates the
Act according to the specific terms set
forth in the legislation, which became
effective on December 19, 2016.
Accordingly, we conclude that this
change constitutes a ministerial,
noncontroversial amendment to our
rules and thus this action falls within
the ‘‘good cause’’ exception of the
Administrative Procedure Act. We
therefore forgo notice and comment in
this limited context.
4. We also find good cause to make
this rule change effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Specifically, making this rule change
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register enables SNFs to benefit
expeditiously, consistent with
Congress’s goal of including SNFs as an
eligible health care provider type under
the RHC Program. No additional time is
needed for affected parties to prepare for
the rule’s effectiveness because
Commission staff, USAC, and interested
parties have already had a chance to do
so; the associated RHC Program
application forms incorporating SNFs
into the RHC Program have already been
prepared, put out for notice and
comment, and approved. Additionally,
while the rule change enables SNFs to
benefit from the RHC Program, it does
not immediately oblige them to take any
particular action unless they choose to
do so. Thus, we find good cause to make
this rule change effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
II. Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
2. Because approval has already been
obtained for the addition of SNFs to the
category of eligible health care providers
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13,
this document does not contain any new
or modified information collection
requirements subject to PRA. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees,
pursuant to the Small Business
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28243-28244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12967]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 97
[FRL-9963-26-OAR]
Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New
Unit Set-Asides for the 2017 Compliance Year
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of data availability (NODA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice
of the availability of data on emission allowance allocations to
certain units under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). EPA has
completed preliminary calculations for the first round of allocations
of allowances from the CSAPR new unit set-asides (NUSAs) for the 2017
control periods and has posted spreadsheets containing the calculations
on EPA's Web site. EPA will consider timely objections to the
preliminary calculations (including objections concerning the
identification of units eligible for allocations) and will promulgate a
notice responding to any such objections no later than August 1, 2017,
the deadline for recording the first-round allocations in sources'
Allowance Management System accounts.
DATES: Objections to the information referenced in this notice must be
received on or before July 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov.
Include ``2017 NUSA allocations'' in the email subject line and include
your name, title, affiliation, address, phone number, and email address
in the body of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action
should be addressed to Robert Miller at (202) 343-9077 or
miller.robertl@epa.gov or Kenon Smith at (202) 343-9164 or
smith.kenon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under each CSAPR trading program where EPA
is responsible for determining emission allowance allocations, a
portion of each state's emissions budget for the program for each
control period is reserved in a NUSA (and in an additional Indian
country NUSA in the case of states with Indian country within their
borders) for allocation to certain units that would not otherwise
receive allowance allocations. The procedures for annually allocating
allowances from each NUSA to eligible units are set forth in the CSAPR
regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and 97.412 (NOX Annual
Trading Program), 97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone Season
Group 1 Trading Program), 97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1
Trading Program), 97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2 Trading
Program), and 97.811(b) and 97.812 (NOX Ozone Season Group 2
Trading Program). Each NUSA allowance allocation process involves up to
two rounds of allocations to eligible units, termed ``new'' units,
followed by the allocation to ``existing'' units of any allowances not
allocated to new units.
This notice concerns preliminary calculations for the first round
of NUSA allowance allocations for the 2017 control periods. Generally,
the allocation procedures call for each eligible unit to receive a
first-round 2017 NUSA allocation equal to its 2016 emissions as
reported under 40 CFR part 75 unless the total of such allocations to
all eligible units would exceed the amount of allowances in the NUSA,
in which case the allocations are reduced on a pro-rata basis.
The detailed unit-by-unit data and preliminary allowance allocation
calculations are set forth in Excel spreadsheets titled
``CSAPR_NUSA_2017_NOX_Annual_1st_Round_Prelim_Data'',
``CSAPR_NUSA_2017_NOX_OS_1st_Round_Prelim_Data'', and
``CSAPR_NUSA_2017_SO2_1st_Round_Prelim_Data,'' available on
EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/csapr/new-unit-set-aside-notices-data-availability-nusa-noda-cross-state-air-pollution-rule. Each of the
spreadsheets contains a separate worksheet for each state covered by
that program showing, for each unit identified as eligible for a first-
round NUSA allocation, (1) the unit's emissions in the 2016 control
period (annual or ozone season as applicable), (2) the maximum first-
round 2017 NUSA allowance allocation for which the unit is eligible
(typically the unit's emissions in the 2016 control period), (3)
various adjustments to the unit's maximum allocation, many of which are
necessary only if the NUSA pool is
[[Page 28244]]
oversubscribed, and (4) the preliminary calculation of the unit's
first-round 2017 NUSA allowance allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a summary showing (1) the
quantity of allowances initially available in that state's 2017 NUSA,
(2) the sum of the first-round 2017 NUSA allowance allocations that
will be made to new units in that state, assuming there are no
corrections to the data, and (3) the quantity of allowances that would
remain in the 2017 NUSA for use in second-round allocations to new
units (or ultimately for allocation to existing units), again assuming
there are no corrections to the data.
Objections should be strictly limited to the data and calculations
upon which the NUSA allowance allocations are based and should be
emailed to the address identified in ADDRESSES. Objections must
include: (1) Precise identification of the specific data and/or
calculations the commenter believes are inaccurate, (2) new proposed
data and/or calculations upon which the commenter believes EPA should
rely instead to determine allowance allocations, and (3) the reasons
why EPA should rely on the commenter's proposed data and/or
calculations and not the data referenced in this notice.
EPA notes that an allocation or lack of allocation of allowances to
a given unit does not constitute a determination that CSAPR does or
does not apply to the unit. EPA also notes that allocations are subject
to potential correction.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), 97.611(b), 97.711(b),
and 97.811(b).
Dated: May 22, 2017.
Richard A. Haeuber,
Acting Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric
Programs, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2017-12967 Filed 6-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P