Safety Zone; Kaskaskia River, Evansville, IL, 28290-28292 [2017-12921]
Download as PDF
28290
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting 7 hours
that would prohibit entry within the
zone during heats. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration (REC)
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Jun 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
Dated: June 14, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
2. Add § 165.T09–0200 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0200 Safety Zone; Cleveland
Dragon Boat Festival; Lake Erie, Cleveland,
OH.
(a) This zone will encompass all
waters of Lake Erie, off of Whiskey
Island, Cleveland, OH inside an area
starting on shore at position 41°29′57″
N., 081°43′00″ W., extending in a
straight line to the break wall at position
41°30′12″ N., 081°43′14″ W., then along
the break wall to position 41°30′23″ N.,
081°42′56″ W., and back to the shore at
position 41°30′05″ N., 081°42′39″ W.
(NAD 83).
(b) Enforcement Period. This
regulation will be enforced from 8 a.m.
through 3 p.m. on August 12, 2017.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2017–12918 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0521]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Kaskaskia River,
Evansville, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on the Kaskaskia
River between miles 9 and 11. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on these navigable waters
near Evansville, IL during high speed
boat races on September 16 and 17,
2017. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from being
in the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0521 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Sean
Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 314–269–2332, email
Sean.M.Peterson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
On March 8, 2017, Coast Guard Sector
Upper Mississippi River received an
application for a marine event from the
Kentucky Drag Boat Association for the
Evansville, IL Drag Boat Races. The
event is scheduled to take place over
two days, September 16 and 17, 2017,
on the Kaskaskia River near Evansville,
IL. High speed boat practices and races
will take place during the hours of 8
a.m. to 6 p.m. on September 16 and 17,
2017.
Hazards from this race include
impediment of the navigational channel
and high speed vessels participating in
the race. The Captain of the Port Upper
Mississippi River (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the race would be a
safety concern for anyone transiting
through the race course.
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
vessels and the navigable waters
between mile markers 9 and 11 before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard proposes this proposed
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 8 a.m. on September
16, 2017 through 6 p.m. on September
17, 2017. The zone would be enforced
from 8 a.m. through 6 p.m. each day.
The safety zone would cover all
navigable waters between mile markers
9 and 11 on the Kaskaskia River in
Evansville, IL. The duration of the zone
is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and participants on the
navigable waters before, during, and
after the scheduled high speed boat
practices and races. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we
are proposing appears at the end of this
document.
17:44 Jun 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
VerDate Sep<11>2014
IV. Regulatory Analyses
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone. This
proposed rule would have a minimal
impact on navigable waterway vessel
traffic because it would be in enforced
for ten daylight hours on two
consecutive days and would restrict
transit in and through a section of the
Kaskaskia River extending two miles.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM)
via VHF–FM marine channel 16 about
the zone, and the proposed rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone. The racing events on
September 16 and 17, 2017 will take
place in heats, allowing time for vessels
affected by the closure to transit the area
between heats when deemed safe by onscene representatives of the COTP.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28291
reasons stated in section IV.A. above
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule would
have implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
28292
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of the rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting for ten
hours on two days, during daylight
hours and restricts transit in and
through a section of the Kaskaskia River
extending two miles. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this proposed rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include
the docket number for this proposed
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Jun 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security Measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0521 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0521 Safety Zone; Kaskaskia
River, Evansville, IL.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Kaskaskia River between mile markers 9
and 11, Evansville, IL.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, a ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River
(COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or a designated representative.
(2) To request entry into the safety
zone, contact the COTP or a designated
representative via VHF–FM channel 16,
or Coast Guard Sector Upper
Mississippi River by telephone at 314–
269–2332. Those persons authorized to
be in the safety zone must comply with
all lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. on
September 16, 2017 through 6 p.m. on
September 17, 2017
(e) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through
broadcast notices to mariners of the
enforcement period for the safety zone.
Dated: June 15, 2017.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Upper Mississippi.
[FR Doc. 2017–12921 Filed 6–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0647; FRL–9960–39–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District, Northern Sierra
Air Quality Management District, and
San Diego County Air Pollution Control
District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District
(MDAQMD), Northern Sierra Air
Quality Management District
(NSAQMD), and San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD)
portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern aerospace assembly,
rework, and component manufacturing
operations; emissions statements and
recordkeeping; and definitions,
respectively. We are proposing to
approve local rules to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28290-28292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12921]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0521]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Kaskaskia River, Evansville, IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the
Kaskaskia River between miles 9 and 11. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near
Evansville, IL during high speed boat races on September 16 and 17,
2017. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from
being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Upper Mississippi River or a designated representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0521 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed
[[Page 28291]]
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email Sean.M.Peterson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On March 8, 2017, Coast Guard Sector Upper Mississippi River
received an application for a marine event from the Kentucky Drag Boat
Association for the Evansville, IL Drag Boat Races. The event is
scheduled to take place over two days, September 16 and 17, 2017, on
the Kaskaskia River near Evansville, IL. High speed boat practices and
races will take place during the hours of 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. on September
16 and 17, 2017.
Hazards from this race include impediment of the navigational
channel and high speed vessels participating in the race. The Captain
of the Port Upper Mississippi River (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the race would be a safety concern
for anyone transiting through the race course.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
vessels and the navigable waters between mile markers 9 and 11 before,
during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this
proposed rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8 a.m. on
September 16, 2017 through 6 p.m. on September 17, 2017. The zone would
be enforced from 8 a.m. through 6 p.m. each day. The safety zone would
cover all navigable waters between mile markers 9 and 11 on the
Kaskaskia River in Evansville, IL. The duration of the zone is intended
to ensure the safety of vessels and participants on the navigable
waters before, during, and after the scheduled high speed boat
practices and races. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter
the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. This proposed
rule would have a minimal impact on navigable waterway vessel traffic
because it would be in enforced for ten daylight hours on two
consecutive days and would restrict transit in and through a section of
the Kaskaskia River extending two miles. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the proposed rule would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone. The racing events on September 16
and 17, 2017 will take place in heats, allowing time for vessels
affected by the closure to transit the area between heats when deemed
safe by on-scene representatives of the COTP.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A. above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule would have implications for federalism
or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
[[Page 28292]]
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of the rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting for ten hours on two days, during daylight hours and
restricts transit in and through a section of the Kaskaskia River
extending two miles. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this proposed
rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number
for this proposed rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0521 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0521 Safety Zone; Kaskaskia River, Evansville, IL.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Kaskaskia River between mile markers 9 and 11,
Evansville, IL.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, a ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
(2) To request entry into the safety zone, contact the COTP or a
designated representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or Coast Guard Sector
Upper Mississippi River by telephone at 314-269-2332. Those persons
authorized to be in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP or a designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
on September 16, 2017 through 6 p.m. on September 17, 2017
(e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to
mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone.
Dated: June 15, 2017.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Upper
Mississippi.
[FR Doc. 2017-12921 Filed 6-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P