Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 27297-27300 [2017-12270]
Download as PDF
27297
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Notices
Document
ADAMS
Accession
No.
Final Safety Evaluation Report for Combined License for North Anna Unit 3 ...................................................................................
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Combined License (COL) for North Anna Unit 3 .....................................
Commission’s Memorandum and Order on the uncontested hearing (Record of Decision) ..............................................................
Summary Record of Decision .............................................................................................................................................................
Letter transmitting Combined License No. NPF–103 and accompanying documentation .................................................................
Combined License No. NPF–103 .......................................................................................................................................................
ML16259A210
ML100680117
ML17151A406
ML17121A548
ML17128A500
ML17095A813
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of June 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Francis M. Akstulewicz,
Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing,
Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2017–12271 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
[Docket Nos. 52–040–COL and 52–041–
COL; ASLBP No. 10–903–02–COL–BD01]
In the Matter of Florida Power & Light
Company (Turkey Point Units 6 and 7)
June 8, 2017.
Before Administrative Judges: E. Roy
Hawkens, Chairman, Dr. Michael F.
Kennedy, Dr. William C. Burnett
Notice and Order
(Scheduling and Providing Instructions
for Oral Argument)
Pending before this Licensing Board is
a request for a hearing and petition to
intervene submitted on April 18, 2017
by the City of Miami, the Village of
Pinecrest, and the City of South Miami
(Petitioners).1 Petitioners’ proffered
contention alleges that:
The [Final Safety Evaluation Report
(FSER)] is deficient in concluding that
[Florida Power & Light Company (FPL)] has
demonstrated that it possesses or has
reasonable assurance of obtaining the funds
necessary to cover estimated construction
costs and related fuel cycle costs and FPL has
failed to indicate source(s) of funds to cover
these costs.2
After reviewing the petition and the
subsequently filed related pleadings,3
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
1 See
Petition for Leave to Intervene in a Hearing
on [FPL’s] Combined Construction and Operating
License Application for Turkey Point Units 6 & 7
and File a New Contention (Apr. 18, 2017)
[hereinafter Petition].
2 Petition at 7.
3 See NRC Staff’s Response to New Arguments
Raised in Petitioners’ Reply (June 1, 2017);
Petitioners’ Reply to NRC Staff and FPL’s Answers
to Petition for Leave to Intervene in a Hearing on
[FPL’s] Combined Construction and Operating
License Application for Turkey Point Units 6 & 7
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
the Board has determined that oral
argument will assist it in resolving the
issues presented. The Board will hold a
telephonic oral argument concerning
contention admissibility on Tuesday,
June 20, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. EDT.
The Board will hear argument from
counsel for the parties in the following
order: (1) Petitioners; (2) FPL; and (3)
the NRC Staff. Petitioners will have 60
minutes of argument time, and they may
reserve up to 20 minutes of that time for
rebuttal. FPL and the NRC Staff will
each have 30 minutes of argument time.
The following list includes topics the
parties should address during oral
argument. This list is not intended to be
exclusive.
• Whether Westinghouse’s bankruptcy filing,
the resulting alleged termination of its
Reservation Agreement with FPL, or the
lack of a construction agreement between
Westinghouse and FPL raise a genuine
dispute on a material issue of law or fact
with FPL’s application for a combined
license
• Whether FPL’s ability to recover costs is
material to the NRC Staff’s determination
of FPL’s financial qualifications
• Whether Westinghouse’s bankruptcy raises
a genuine dispute on a material issue if
FPL’s ability to recover costs is not
material to the NRC Staff’s determination
of FPL’s financial qualifications
• The extent of the NRC Staff’s review of an
applicant’s financial qualifications and the
degree to which an applicant must be
financially qualified to engage in
construction of new nuclear units
• The feasibility of the Turkey Point project
following Westinghouse’s bankruptcy
• The effect on the petition of FPL’s May 1
filing to the Florida Public Service
Commission to request a deferral of nuclear
cost recovery
• The effect on the petition of FPL’s May 1
representation to the Florida Public Service
Commission that the Turkey Point project
is on a ‘‘pause’’
On or before Friday, June 16, parties
shall provide by email to the Board and
the service list the name of the attorney
and File a New Contention (May 22, 2017); NRC
Staff Answer to Petition for Leave to Intervene and
[File] New Contention (May 15, 2017); [FPL’s]
Answer Opposing [Petitioners’] Petition to
Intervene and Request for Hearing Regarding the
Combined Construction and Operating License
Application for Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 (May 15,
2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
who will present oral argument. The
Board’s law clerk, Kimberly Hsu, will
provide the dial-in number and
passcode to be used by counsel for the
oral argument. No witnesses, other
representatives of the parties, or
members of the public will be heard
during the argument. However,
individuals who wish to hear the oral
argument live on the listen-only
telephone line may do so, and should
contact Ms. Hsu at Kimberly.Hsu@
nrc.gov or (301) 415–5939 for the dialin number and passcode.
It is so ordered.
Rockville, Maryland.
Dated: June 8, 2017.
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chairman, Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. 2017–12358 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72–1014, 72–59, and 50–271;
NRC–2017–0134]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Station; Independent Spent Fuel
Storage Installation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a request
submitted by Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (Entergy) on November
9, 2016, and supplemented on January
9, 2017, for its general license to operate
an independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI) at the Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS).
This exemption would permit the
VYNPS to load and store certain lowenriched channeled undamaged fuel
assemblies with higher enriched fuel
assemblies in the same HI–STORM 100
multi-purpose canister (MPC)–68M
using Certificate of Compliance (CoC)
No. 1014, Amendment No. 10.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
27298
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Notices
June 14, 2017.
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2017–0134 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2017–0134. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in this document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: YenJu Chen, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555; telephone: 301–415–1018;
email: Yen-Ju.Chen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The VYNPS began operation in 1972.
The reactor was permanently shut down
on December 29, 2014. The VYNPS
currently stores spent boiling-water
reactor (BWR) fuel assemblies at its
ISFSI in thirteen (13) HI–STORM 100
casks under CoC No. 1014, Amendment
No. 2. The remaining spent fuel
assemblies were removed from the
reactor and transferred to the spent fuel
pool. Entergy, which owns the facility,
submitted the VYNPS Post-Shutdown
Decommissioning Activities Report
(PSDAR) to the NRC on December 19,
2014. In the PSDAR, Entergy stated its
intention to move all of the spent
nuclear fuel assemblies into dry cask
storage by 2020 and put the plant into
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
SAFSTOR 1 until it is ready to fully
decommission the facility.
Consistent with subpart K of part 72
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), a general license
is issued for the storage of spent fuel in
an ISFSI at power reactor sites to
persons authorized to possess or operate
nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR
part 50. Entergy is currently authorized
to store spent fuel at the VYNPS ISFSI
under the 10 CFR part 72 general license
provisions. Entergy plans to use Holtec
HI–STORM 100 storage casks, as
approved by the NRC under CoC No.
1014, Amendment No. 10, at the VYNPS
for dry storage of spent nuclear fuel in
MPC–68M canisters.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated November 9, 2016, as
supplemented on January 9, 2017,
Entergy submitted a request for an
exemption from those provisions of 10
CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3),
72.212(b)(5)(i), 72.212(b)(11), and
72.214 that require compliance with the
terms, conditions, and specifications of
CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, for
the VYNPS to load and store certain
low-enriched channeled undamaged
fuel assemblies with higher enriched
fuel assemblies in the same Holtec HI–
STORM 100 MPC–68M canister.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant such exemptions from
the requirements of the regulations of 10
CFR part 72 as it determines are
authorized by law and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense
and security, and are otherwise in the
public interest.
The NRC staff prepared a safety
evaluation report (SER) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML17054C788) to
document the evaluation of the
proposed mixed-enrichment fuel
loading arrangement to assure
continued protection of public health
and safety, common defense and
security, and the environment. As
summarized below, the NRC’s safety
review concludes that the requested
exemption does not affect the ability of
the cask system to meet the
requirements of 10 CFR part 72.
1 A method of decommissioning in which a
nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a
condition that allows the facility to be safely stored
and subsequently decontaminated (deferred
decontamination) to levels that permit release for
unrestricted use.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
This exemption would permit the
VYNPS to load and store certain lowenriched (up to 3.3 wt.% U–235)
channeled BWR fuel assemblies
classified as undamaged per CoC No.
1014, Amendment No. 10, in the same
MPC with higher enriched (planaraverage initial enrichment up to 4.8
wt.% U–235) BWR fuel assemblies. The
provisions from which the NRC is
granting the exemption require the
VYNPS to follow the conditions of CoC
No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, that
when loading certain low-enriched
channeled undamaged BWR fuel
assemblies in an MPC–68M, all fuel
assemblies in the same MPC are limited
to 3.3 wt.% U–235 maximum planaraverage initial enrichment.
Section 72.7 allows the Commission
to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 72 if the
exemption is authorized by law and will
not endanger life or property nor the
common defense and security. Issuance
of this exemption is consistent with the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and not otherwise inconsistent with
NRC’s regulations or other applicable
laws. Therefore, issuance of the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents No Undue
Risk to Public Health and Safety
Approval of this exemption request
will allow VYNPS to load and store
certain low-enriched channeled
undamaged BWR fuel assemblies in the
same HI–STORM 100 MCP–68M
canister, with higher enriched BWR fuel
assemblies. As discussed in the SER and
summarized in the following sections,
the NRC staff finds that Entergy’s
proposed action is acceptable and will
not endanger life or property.
Review of the Requested Exemption
The classification of certain lowenriched channeled BWR fuel as
undamaged for the Holtec HI–STORM
100 system was reviewed previously
and approved by the NRC in
Amendment No. 9, Revision 1, on
March 21, 2016. The CoC has a
restriction that when loading certain
low-enriched channeled undamaged
BWR fuel (limited to 3.3 wt.% U–235),
all fuels in the same MPC are limited to
3.3 wt.% U–235 maximum planaraverage initial enrichment.
Entergy stated that the VYNPS has a
large number of assemblies that fall into
the category of low-enriched channeled
undamaged BWR fuel. These assemblies
can be mixed with higher enriched fuel
in the same cask to reduce dose rates
because placing the low-enriched
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
27299
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Notices
assemblies on the periphery of the cask
acts as shielding and blocks the
radiation from the higher-enriched fuels
stored in the center of the cask. In order
to reduce maximum dose rates from the
casks for the decommissioning loading
plan, Entergy is seeking an exemption
from the loading restriction.
The NRC staff reviewed the requested
exemption and determined that it does
not change the fundamental design,
components, or safety features of the
storage system. The NRC staff evaluated
the applicable potential safety impacts
of granting the exemption to assess the
potential for any danger to life or
property or the common defense and
security. Specifically, the NRC staff
reviewed the applicant’s criticality and
shielding evaluations for the proposed
exemption.
Criticality Review for the Requested
Exemption: The NRC staff evaluated the
adequacy of the description, methods,
and analyses related to the criticality
evaluation for the requested action to
ensure that the storage of higher
enrichments with low enriched
channeled undamaged fuel in the same
MPC–68M meets the criticality safety
requirements of 10 CFR part 72. The
NRC staff concludes that the HI–STORM
100 Cask System continues to meet the
regulatory requirements that the dry
cask storage system as modified will
continue to remain subcritical under all
credible normal, off-normal, and
accident conditions and provide
reasonable assurance for safe storage of
spent fuel.
Shielding Review for the Requested
Exemption: The objective of the review
is to ensure that, with the exemption
request, the VYNPS continues to
provide adequate protection against
direct radiation to the onsite operating
workers and members of the public, and
that the ISFSI continues to satisfy the
regulatory requirements during normal
operating, off-normal, and design-basis
accident conditions. The NRC staff
found that the mixing of lower enriched
fuel (at 3.3 wt.% U–235) and higher
enriched fuel (up to 4.8 wt.% U–235)
reduced the overall dose rates.
Therefore, the staff concludes that
granting this exemption assures that the
VYNPS ISFSI continues to satisfy the
dose limits as specified in 10 CFR
72.104. It also provides benefit to the
onsite workers and the public.
C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the
Common Defense and Security
Review of Common Defense and
Security: The NRC staff also considered
potential impacts of granting the
exemption on the common defense and
security. The requested exemption is
not related to any security or common
defense aspect of the VYNPS ISFSI,
therefore granting the exemption would
not result in any potential impacts to
common defense and security.
Based on its review, the NRC staff has
determined that under the requested
exemption, the storage system will
continue to meet the safety
requirements of 10 CFR part 72 and the
offsite dose limits of 10 CFR part 20
and, therefore, will not endanger life or
property. The NRC staff also finds that
the exemption would not endanger
common defense and security.
D. Otherwise in the Public Interest
In considering whether granting the
exemption is in the public interest, the
NRC staff considered the alternative of
not granting the exemption. If the
exemption was not granted, in order to
comply with the CoC, when the VYNPS
loaded certain low-enriched channeled
undamaged BWR fuel, all fuels in the
same MPC would be limited to 3.3 wt.%
U–235 maximum planar-average initial
enrichment.
Entergy stated that granting the
exemption is in the public interest since
it will reduce operational dose rate by
loading certain low-enriched channeled
undamaged BWR fuel with higher
enriched BWR fuel in the same MPC,
and NRC staff confirms this statement in
Section B.6 of the SER. Additionally,
granting the exemption would support
VYNPS’s cask loading schedule as part
of its decommissioning effort.
The NRC staff concludes that allowing
the VYNPS to load certain low-enriched
channeled undamaged BWR fuel with
higher enriched BWR fuel in the same
MPC would continue to provide
adequate protection of public health and
safety. Therefore, granting the
exemption is otherwise in the public
interest.
E. Environmental Considerations
The NRC staff also considered
whether there would be any significant
environmental impacts associated with
the exemption. For this proposed action,
the NRC staff performed an
environmental assessment pursuant to
10 CFR 51.30. The environmental
assessment concluded that the proposed
action would not significantly impact
the quality of the human environment.
The NRC staff concluded that the
proposed action would not result in any
changes in the types or amounts of any
radiological or non-radiological
effluents that may be released offsite,
and there is no significant increase in
occupational or public radiation
exposure because of the proposed
action. The Environmental Assessment
and the Finding of No Significant
Impact was published on June 6, 2017
(82 FR 26144).
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
72.7, this exemption is authorized by
law, will not endanger life or property
or the common defense and security,
and is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants Entergy an exemption from those
provisions of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10
CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i),
10 CFR 72.214, and the portion of 10
CFR 72.212(b)(11) that require
compliance with terms, conditions, and
specifications of the CoC No. 1014,
Amendment No. 10, for the VYNPS to
load and store certain low-enriched
channeled undamaged fuel assemblies
with higher enriched fuel assemblies in
the same Holtec HI–STORM 100 MPC–
68M canister.
V. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the methods indicated in the
ADDRESSES section.
ADAMS Accession
No.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Document
Entergy’s exemption request, November 9, 2016 ......................................................................................................................
Entergy’s supplemental information, January 9, 2017 ................................................................................................................
Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 10 for the HI–STORM 100 Cask System, dated May 25, 2016 ...........
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report, December 29, 2014 ...............
NRC’s SER for the exemption request, dated May 26, 2017 ....................................................................................................
CoC and SER for Amendment No. 9, Revision 1, to CoC 1014 issued on March 21, 2016 ....................................................
Environmental Assessment (82 FR 26144, June 6, 2017) .........................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
ML16319A102
ML17010A300
ML16144A177
ML14357A110
ML17054C788
ML16056A529
ML16343A859
27300
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Notices
The exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6 day of
June, 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John McKirgan,
Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Division
of Spent Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2017–12270 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2017–144 and CP2017–203;
MC2017–145 and CP2017–204; MC2017–146
and CP2017–205; MC2017–147 and CP2017–
206]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: June 16,
2017.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jun 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.40.
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: MC2017–144 and
CP2017–203; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 43 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under
Seal) of Unredacted Governors’
Decision, Contract, and Supporting
Data; Filing Acceptance Date: June 8,
2017; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq.; Public
Representative: Katalin K. Clendenin;
Comments Due: June 16, 2017.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2017–145 and
CP2017–204; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 44 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under
Seal) of Unredacted Governors’
Decision, Contract, and Supporting
Data; Filing Acceptance Date: June 8,
2017; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq.; Public
Representative: Katalin K. Clendenin;
Comments Due: June 16, 2017.
3. Docket No(s).: MC2017–146 and
CP2017–205; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Contract 328 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted
Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data; Filing Acceptance
Date: June 8, 2017; Filing Authority: 39
U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq.;
Public Representative: Lawrence
Fenster; Comments Due: June 16, 2017.
4. Docket No(s).: MC2017–147 and
CP2017–206; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail
Contract 49 to Competitive Product List
and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
Unredacted Governors’ Decision,
Contract, and Supporting Data; Filing
Acceptance Date: June 8, 2017; Filing
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq.; Public Representative:
Lawrence Fenster; Comments Due: June
16, 2017.
This notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–12300 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80882; File No. SR–C2–
2017–020]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Penny Pilot
Program
June 8, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2017, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27297-27300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12270]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72-1014, 72-59, and 50-271; NRC-2017-0134]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Station; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a request submitted by Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (Entergy) on November 9, 2016, and supplemented on
January 9, 2017, for its general license to operate an independent
spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) at the Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Station (VYNPS). This exemption would permit the VYNPS to load
and store certain low-enriched channeled undamaged fuel assemblies with
higher enriched fuel assemblies in the same HI-STORM 100 multi-purpose
canister (MPC)-68M using Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1014,
Amendment No. 10.
[[Page 27298]]
DATES: June 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0134 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0134. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this
document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yen-Ju Chen, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555; telephone: 301-415-1018; email: Yen-Ju.Chen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The VYNPS began operation in 1972. The reactor was permanently shut
down on December 29, 2014. The VYNPS currently stores spent boiling-
water reactor (BWR) fuel assemblies at its ISFSI in thirteen (13) HI-
STORM 100 casks under CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 2. The remaining
spent fuel assemblies were removed from the reactor and transferred to
the spent fuel pool. Entergy, which owns the facility, submitted the
VYNPS Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) to the
NRC on December 19, 2014. In the PSDAR, Entergy stated its intention to
move all of the spent nuclear fuel assemblies into dry cask storage by
2020 and put the plant into SAFSTOR \1\ until it is ready to fully
decommission the facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A method of decommissioning in which a nuclear facility is
placed and maintained in a condition that allows the facility to be
safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred
decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with subpart K of part 72 of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), a general license is issued for the
storage of spent fuel in an ISFSI at power reactor sites to persons
authorized to possess or operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR
part 50. Entergy is currently authorized to store spent fuel at the
VYNPS ISFSI under the 10 CFR part 72 general license provisions.
Entergy plans to use Holtec HI-STORM 100 storage casks, as approved by
the NRC under CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, at the VYNPS for dry
storage of spent nuclear fuel in MPC-68M canisters.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated November 9, 2016, as supplemented on January 9,
2017, Entergy submitted a request for an exemption from those
provisions of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(3), 72.212(b)(5)(i),
72.212(b)(11), and 72.214 that require compliance with the terms,
conditions, and specifications of CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, for
the VYNPS to load and store certain low-enriched channeled undamaged
fuel assemblies with higher enriched fuel assemblies in the same Holtec
HI-STORM 100 MPC-68M canister.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions
from the requirements of the regulations of 10 CFR part 72 as it
determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property
or the common defense and security, and are otherwise in the public
interest.
The NRC staff prepared a safety evaluation report (SER) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML17054C788) to document the evaluation of the proposed
mixed-enrichment fuel loading arrangement to assure continued
protection of public health and safety, common defense and security,
and the environment. As summarized below, the NRC's safety review
concludes that the requested exemption does not affect the ability of
the cask system to meet the requirements of 10 CFR part 72.
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
This exemption would permit the VYNPS to load and store certain
low-enriched (up to 3.3 wt.% U-235) channeled BWR fuel assemblies
classified as undamaged per CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, in the same
MPC with higher enriched (planar-average initial enrichment up to 4.8
wt.% U-235) BWR fuel assemblies. The provisions from which the NRC is
granting the exemption require the VYNPS to follow the conditions of
CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, that when loading certain low-enriched
channeled undamaged BWR fuel assemblies in an MPC-68M, all fuel
assemblies in the same MPC are limited to 3.3 wt.% U-235 maximum
planar-average initial enrichment.
Section 72.7 allows the Commission to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 72 if the exemption is authorized by law
and will not endanger life or property nor the common defense and
security. Issuance of this exemption is consistent with the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and not otherwise inconsistent with
NRC's regulations or other applicable laws. Therefore, issuance of the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
Approval of this exemption request will allow VYNPS to load and
store certain low-enriched channeled undamaged BWR fuel assemblies in
the same HI-STORM 100 MCP-68M canister, with higher enriched BWR fuel
assemblies. As discussed in the SER and summarized in the following
sections, the NRC staff finds that Entergy's proposed action is
acceptable and will not endanger life or property.
Review of the Requested Exemption
The classification of certain low-enriched channeled BWR fuel as
undamaged for the Holtec HI-STORM 100 system was reviewed previously
and approved by the NRC in Amendment No. 9, Revision 1, on March 21,
2016. The CoC has a restriction that when loading certain low-enriched
channeled undamaged BWR fuel (limited to 3.3 wt.% U-235), all fuels in
the same MPC are limited to 3.3 wt.% U-235 maximum planar-average
initial enrichment.
Entergy stated that the VYNPS has a large number of assemblies that
fall into the category of low-enriched channeled undamaged BWR fuel.
These assemblies can be mixed with higher enriched fuel in the same
cask to reduce dose rates because placing the low-enriched
[[Page 27299]]
assemblies on the periphery of the cask acts as shielding and blocks
the radiation from the higher-enriched fuels stored in the center of
the cask. In order to reduce maximum dose rates from the casks for the
decommissioning loading plan, Entergy is seeking an exemption from the
loading restriction.
The NRC staff reviewed the requested exemption and determined that
it does not change the fundamental design, components, or safety
features of the storage system. The NRC staff evaluated the applicable
potential safety impacts of granting the exemption to assess the
potential for any danger to life or property or the common defense and
security. Specifically, the NRC staff reviewed the applicant's
criticality and shielding evaluations for the proposed exemption.
Criticality Review for the Requested Exemption: The NRC staff
evaluated the adequacy of the description, methods, and analyses
related to the criticality evaluation for the requested action to
ensure that the storage of higher enrichments with low enriched
channeled undamaged fuel in the same MPC-68M meets the criticality
safety requirements of 10 CFR part 72. The NRC staff concludes that the
HI-STORM 100 Cask System continues to meet the regulatory requirements
that the dry cask storage system as modified will continue to remain
subcritical under all credible normal, off-normal, and accident
conditions and provide reasonable assurance for safe storage of spent
fuel.
Shielding Review for the Requested Exemption: The objective of the
review is to ensure that, with the exemption request, the VYNPS
continues to provide adequate protection against direct radiation to
the onsite operating workers and members of the public, and that the
ISFSI continues to satisfy the regulatory requirements during normal
operating, off-normal, and design-basis accident conditions. The NRC
staff found that the mixing of lower enriched fuel (at 3.3 wt.% U-235)
and higher enriched fuel (up to 4.8 wt.% U-235) reduced the overall
dose rates. Therefore, the staff concludes that granting this exemption
assures that the VYNPS ISFSI continues to satisfy the dose limits as
specified in 10 CFR 72.104. It also provides benefit to the onsite
workers and the public.
C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security
Review of Common Defense and Security: The NRC staff also
considered potential impacts of granting the exemption on the common
defense and security. The requested exemption is not related to any
security or common defense aspect of the VYNPS ISFSI, therefore
granting the exemption would not result in any potential impacts to
common defense and security.
Based on its review, the NRC staff has determined that under the
requested exemption, the storage system will continue to meet the
safety requirements of 10 CFR part 72 and the offsite dose limits of 10
CFR part 20 and, therefore, will not endanger life or property. The NRC
staff also finds that the exemption would not endanger common defense
and security.
D. Otherwise in the Public Interest
In considering whether granting the exemption is in the public
interest, the NRC staff considered the alternative of not granting the
exemption. If the exemption was not granted, in order to comply with
the CoC, when the VYNPS loaded certain low-enriched channeled undamaged
BWR fuel, all fuels in the same MPC would be limited to 3.3 wt.% U-235
maximum planar-average initial enrichment.
Entergy stated that granting the exemption is in the public
interest since it will reduce operational dose rate by loading certain
low-enriched channeled undamaged BWR fuel with higher enriched BWR fuel
in the same MPC, and NRC staff confirms this statement in Section B.6
of the SER. Additionally, granting the exemption would support VYNPS's
cask loading schedule as part of its decommissioning effort.
The NRC staff concludes that allowing the VYNPS to load certain
low-enriched channeled undamaged BWR fuel with higher enriched BWR fuel
in the same MPC would continue to provide adequate protection of public
health and safety. Therefore, granting the exemption is otherwise in
the public interest.
E. Environmental Considerations
The NRC staff also considered whether there would be any
significant environmental impacts associated with the exemption. For
this proposed action, the NRC staff performed an environmental
assessment pursuant to 10 CFR 51.30. The environmental assessment
concluded that the proposed action would not significantly impact the
quality of the human environment. The NRC staff concluded that the
proposed action would not result in any changes in the types or amounts
of any radiological or non-radiological effluents that may be released
offsite, and there is no significant increase in occupational or public
radiation exposure because of the proposed action. The Environmental
Assessment and the Finding of No Significant Impact was published on
June 6, 2017 (82 FR 26144).
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
72.7, this exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Entergy an
exemption from those provisions of 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), 10 CFR
72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), 10 CFR 72.214, and the portion of
10 CFR 72.212(b)(11) that require compliance with terms, conditions,
and specifications of the CoC No. 1014, Amendment No. 10, for the VYNPS
to load and store certain low-enriched channeled undamaged fuel
assemblies with higher enriched fuel assemblies in the same Holtec HI-
STORM 100 MPC-68M canister.
V. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the methods indicated in the
ADDRESSES section.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS Accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entergy's exemption request, November ML16319A102
9, 2016.
Entergy's supplemental information, ML17010A300
January 9, 2017.
Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, ML16144A177
Amendment No. 10 for the HI-STORM
100 Cask System, dated May 25, 2016.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station ML14357A110
Post-Shutdown Decommissioning
Activities Report, December 29, 2014.
NRC's SER for the exemption request, ML17054C788
dated May 26, 2017.
CoC and SER for Amendment No. 9, ML16056A529
Revision 1, to CoC 1014 issued on
March 21, 2016.
Environmental Assessment (82 FR ML16343A859
26144, June 6, 2017).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27300]]
The exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6 day of June, 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John McKirgan,
Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2017-12270 Filed 6-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P