Military Licensing and State Commercial Driver's License Reciprocity, 26894-26902 [2017-12079]
Download as PDF
26894
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.87 on: June 6, 2017.
Daphne Y. Jefferson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–12080 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 383, 384
[Docket No. FMCSA–2017–0047]
RIN 2126–AB99
Military Licensing and State
Commercial Driver’s License
Reciprocity
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
allow State Driver Licensing Agencies
(SDLAs) to waive the requirements for
the commercial driver’s license (CDL)
knowledge tests for certain individuals
who are, or were, regularly employed
within the last year in a military
position that requires/required, the
operation of a commercial motor vehicle
(CMV).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received on or before August 11, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Docket Number FMCSA–
2017–0047 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
instructions on submitting comments,
including collection of information
comments for the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, OMB.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Selden Fritschner, CDL Division,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, by email at Selden.fritschner@
dot.gov, or by telephone at 202–366–
0677. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Waiver of Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
II. Executive Summary
III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
IV. Regulatory Background
A. Current Standards
B. Recent Activity
V. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
VI. Removal of Regulatory Guidance
VII. International Impacts
VIII. Section-by-Section
IX. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O.
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small
Entities)
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection of
Information)
F. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
G. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
H. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
I. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
J. Privacy
K. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
L. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution,
or Use)
M. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
N. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (Technical Standards)
O. Environment (NEPA, CAA,
Environmental Justice)
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
NPRM (Docket No. FMCSA–2017–
0047), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each section
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. FMCSA recommends that
you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that FMCSA can contact you if there
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
are questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, put the
docket number, FMCSA–2017–0047, in
the keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’
When the new screen appears, click on
the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ button and type
your comment into the text box on the
following screen. Choose whether you
are submitting your comment as an
individual or on behalf of a third party
and then submit.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope.
FMCSA will consider all comments
and material received during the
comment period and may change this
proposed rule based on your comments.
FMCSA may issue a final rule at any
time after the close of the comment
period.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Insert the
docket number, FMCSA–2017–0047, in
the keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, click the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’
button and choose the document to
review. If you do not have access to the
Internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
C. Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c),
DOT solicits comments from the public
to better inform its rulemaking process.
DOT posts these comments, without
edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
D. Waiver of Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
Under section 5202 of the Fixing
America’s Surface Transportation Act,
Public Law 114–94 (FAST Act), if a
regulatory proposal is likely to lead to
the promulgation of a major rule,
agencies are required to start the process
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
with an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) or a negotiated
rulemaking, unless the Agency finds
good cause that an ANPRM is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. This NPRM is not
subject to these provisions because it is
not likely to lead to the promulgation of
a major rule.
II. Executive Summary
This proposed rule would allow
SDLAs to waive the requirements for a
knowledge test for certain individuals
who are regularly employed, or were
regularly employed within the last year,
in a military position requiring the
operation of a CMV. This rulemaking
implements part of section 5401 of the
FAST Act.
Today’s proposed rule, in
combination with a recent rulemaking—
Commercial Driver’s License
Requirements of the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–
21) and the Military Commercial
Driver’s License Act of 2012, published
on October 13, 2016, (81 FR 70634),
hereafter referred to as the Military CDL
I Rule—would give States the option to
waive both the CDL knowledge and
skills tests for certain current and
former military service members who
received training in the operation of
CMVs during active-duty or reserve
service in military vehicles that are
comparable to CMVs. The combined
effect of the Military CDL I Rule and this
proposal would allow certain current or
former military drivers, domiciled in
participating States, to transition more
quickly from the armed forces to
civilian driving careers.
FMCSA evaluated potential costs and
benefits associated with this proposed
rulemaking. The Agency concluded that
costs, if any, would be minimal and are
not quantifiable, while benefits would
accrue primarily to certain current and
former military service members
transitioning into civilian careers as
CMV drivers, and secondarily to their
potential employers. Because the
proposed rule is voluntary—States are
not required to waive the knowledge
and/or skills tests—potential variations
among States with respect to conditions
and limitations imposed beyond those
of this proposed rule could be
substantial. The Agency is unable to
quantify these benefits.
III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This rulemaking rests on the authority
of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
Act of 1986 (CMVSA), as amended,
codified at 49 U.S.C. chapter 313 and 49
CFR parts 382, 383, and 384. The NPRM
also responds to section 5401(a) of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
FAST Act [Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat.
1312, 1546, December 4, 2015]. This
section requires FMCSA to modify the
minimum testing standards of its CDL
regulations to credit the training and
knowledge that certain current or former
military drivers received in the armed
forces, including the reserve
components and National Guard, in
order to drive military vehicles similar
to civilian CMVs [49 U.S.C.
31305(d)(1)(C)].
The CMVSA provides broadly that
‘‘[t]he Secretary of Transportation shall
prescribe regulations on minimum
standards for testing and ensuring the
fitness of an individual operating a
commercial motor vehicle’’ [49 U.S.C.
31305(a)]. In general, those regulations
must include (1) minimum standards for
knowledge and driving (skills) tests, (2)
use of a representative vehicle to take
the driving test, (3) minimum testing
standards, and (4) working knowledge
of CMV regulations and vehicle safety
systems [49 U.S.C. 31305(a)(1)–(4)].
Section 5401(a) of the FAST Act
added 49 U.S.C. 31305(d): ‘‘Standards
for Training and Testing of Veteran
Operators.’’ Section 31305(d)(1)(A)
required the Agency to modify its CDL
regulations to ‘‘exempt a covered
individual from all or a portion of a
driving test if the covered individual
had experience in the armed forces or
reserve components driving vehicles
similar to a commercial motor vehicle.’’
Section 31305(d)(1)(B) required FMCSA
to ‘‘ensure that a covered individual
may apply for an exemption under
subparagraph (A) during, at least, the 1year period beginning on the date on
which such individual separates from
services in the armed forces or reserve
components.’’ The term ‘‘reserve
components’’ includes the Army and
Air National Guard. Section 5401(c) also
directed the Agency to adopt regulations
allowing certain military personnel an
exemption from the normal CDL
domicile requirement, as authorized by
the Military Commercial Driver’s
License Act of 2012 [Military CDL Act]
and codified at 49 U.S.C.
31311(a)(12)(C). These three provisions
were implemented by the Military CDL
I Rule.
The last element of section 5401(a),
which was not addressed in the Military
CDL I Rule, directed the Agency to
‘‘credit the training and knowledge a
covered individual received in the
armed forces or reserve components
driving vehicles similar to a commercial
motor vehicle for purposes of satisfying
minimum standards for training and
knowledge’’ [49 U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C)].
That requirement is the subject of this
NPRM. It should be noted that section
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26895
31305(d)(2)(B) defines a ‘‘covered
individual’’ as someone over 21 years of
age who is ‘‘(i) a former member of the
armed forces; or (ii) a former member of
the reserve components’’ [emphasis
added]. Limitation of the ‘‘credit’’ to be
conferred by section 5401(a) to former
members of the active-duty armed forces
is at least understandable, since activeduty service members would
presumably not have enough off-duty
time to engage in civilian driving
requiring a CDL. However, limiting that
‘‘credit’’ to former members of the
reserve components would exclude
large numbers of current reservist
drivers who received the same rigorous
military CMV training as active-duty
personnel but perform military service
only part-time, while holding full-time
civilian jobs. Because the clear objective
of section 5401(a) is to make it easier for
trained military drivers to obtain CDLs
and move into civilian driving careers,
and because the word ‘‘former’’ in the
definition of a ‘‘covered individual’’
largely defeats the purpose of the
statute, FMCSA has concluded that it
would be appropriate to expand the
eligible population. This NPRM would
therefore allow SDLAs to waive the
knowledge test for both current and
former service members who had
undergone certain CMV driver training
while serving in the military. Using the
broad authority of 49 U.S.C. 31315(b),
the Agency took the same position
(without comment) in granting all
SDLAs the temporary option (for a 2year period) of waiving the CDL
knowledge test for current or former
members of the military services,
including the reserves and National
Guard, who had completed certain
formal military driver training (81 FR
74861, Oct. 27, 2016).
Federal training standards for CMV
drivers were adopted only recently.
Section 32304 of the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–
21) [Pub. L. 112–141, July 6, 2012, 126
Stat. 405, 791] required entry-level
driver training (ELDT) of CDL
applicants [49 U.S.C. 31305(c)]. That
requirement was promulgated on
December 8, 2016 [81 FR 88732].
However, the ELDT rule provides that
‘‘(3) Veterans with military CMV
experience who meet all the
requirements and conditions of § 383.77
of this chapter’’ are not required to
complete the new entry-level training
program [49 CFR 380.603(a)(3)]. Because
§ 383.77 authorizes the States to exempt
CDL applicants with military CMV
experience from the driving skills test,
those drivers are also exempt from
ELDT.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
26896
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Under 49 CFR 383.77, as amended by
the Military CDL I Rule, the Agency
now provides partial credit for military
drivers’ training and knowledge by
allowing States to exempt from the CDL
driving skills test those employees who
are or were regularly employed within
the last year in a military position
requiring the operation of a military
vehicle that is comparable to a CMV.
This NPRM would implement 49
U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C) by giving States
the discretion (subject to certain limits)
to exempt CDL applicants with military
CMV experience from the knowledge
test required for a commercial learner’s
permit (CLP). This NPRM would
complete the requirement of section
31305(d)(1)(C) to ‘‘credit the training
and knowledge a covered individual
received in the armed forces or reserve
components driving vehicles similar to
a commercial motor vehicle for
purposes of satisfying minimum
standards for training and knowledge.’’
IV. Regulatory Background
A. Current Standards
Knowledge Test
As specified in 49 CFR
383.71(a)(2)(ii), any individual applying
for a CDL or CLP is required to take and
pass a general knowledge test. The
general knowledge test must meet the
Federal standards contained in subparts
F, G, and H of part 383 for the
commercial vehicle group that person
operates or expects to operate.
Skills Test
A final rule published on May 9, 2011
[‘‘Commercial Driver’s License Testing
and Commercial Learner’s Permit
Standards’’ (76 FR 26854)] added new
49 CFR 383.77, which allowed the
States to substitute CDL applicants’
eligible military CMV experience for the
skills test.
B. Recent Activity
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Military CDL I Rule
The Military CDL I Rule addressed the
requirements of 49 U.S.C.
31305(d)(1)(A) and (B) (81 FR 70634).
That rule allowed States to extend from
90 days to 1 year the period of time for
an individual who is regularly
employed or was regularly employed in
a position requiring operation of a CMV
to apply for a skills test waiver after
leaving the military.
Additionally, the Military CDL I Rule
allowed the SDLA in the State where
military personnel are stationed (State
of duty station) to coordinate with the
State of domicile to expedite the
processing of applications and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
administer the knowledge and skills
tests for a CLP or CDL. The SDLA in the
State of domicile could then issue the
CLP or CDL on the basis of tests
performed by the SDLA in the State of
duty station.
Knowledge Test Exemption Request
The Missouri Department of Revenue
(DOR) submitted a request for an
exemption from the FMCSA regulation
that requires any driver to pass the
general knowledge test before being
issued a CLP or CDL. The request is
available in docket FMCSA–2016–0130,
or at: https://www.regulations.gov/
document?D=FMCSA-2016-0130-0004.
The Missouri DOR asked FMCSA to
waive the knowledge test requirement
for qualified veterans who participated
in dedicated training through approved
military programs. The Missouri DOR
contended that qualified personnel who
participated in such programs had
already received the numerous hours of
classroom training, practical skills, and
one-on-one road training that are
essential for safe driving. Upon
reviewing the request, FMCSA agreed
with Missouri DOR’s reasoning and
granted a two-year exemption on
October 27, 2016 (81 FR 74861). The
Agency extended the exemption to
allow all SDLAs, at their discretion, to
waive the knowledge test requirements
to qualified veterans, reservists,
National Guard, and active-duty
personnel.
V. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
This NPRM addresses the third
requirement of section 5401(a) of the
FAST Act [49 U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C)] by
proposing to allow SDLAs to exempt
certain personnel from the CDL
knowledge test. Those personnel are
drivers who are regularly employed, or
were regularly employed within the last
year, in a military position requiring
operation of a military vehicle
comparable to a CMV, and who
completed an approved military driver
training program. FMCSA believes that
this proposal would maintain a level of
safety equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved by
requiring military-trained drivers to
pass the knowledge test.
§ 383.23
Commercial Driver’s License
The reference to ‘‘written’’ tests in
§ 383.23(a)(1) would be changed to
‘‘knowledge’’ tests to be consistent with
terminology used elsewhere in part 383.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 383.77 Substitute for Driving Skills
Tests for Drivers With Military CMV
Experience
Section 383.77(a)(1) would be revised
to match proposed section
383.79(b)(2)(iii) and to avoid the
unintended implication of the reference
to ‘‘not . . . more than one license.’’
That original language could be misread
to disqualify from the skills test waiver
a driver who, in the two years
immediately before applying for a CDL,
moved from one State to another and
held licenses sequentially, but not
simultaneously, from both States. The
proposed language makes it clear that an
applicant cannot simultaneously have
held more than one civilian license, in
addition to a military license.
§ 383.79 Skills Testing of Out-of-State
Students; Knowledge Test Waivers for
Military Personnel
The proposal would amend
§ 383.79(b) to allow States to waive the
CLP knowledge test for certain current
or former military service members
(subject to certain conditions and
limitations) who were regularly
employed in a military position
requiring the operation of a CMV during
the year immediately preceding the
license application. The conditions
imposed on the waiver are essentially
those included in § 383.77 when that
provision was adopted in 2011.
Like the Military CDL I Rule, this
proposed rule would be permissive, i.e.,
the States would be allowed, but not
required, to exercise the waiver option.
§ 384.301 Substantial Compliance
General Requirements
FMCSA would amend 49 CFR
384.301 by adding paragraph (l),
specifying a 3-year compliance date for
States. FMCSA has always allowed the
States 3 years after the effective date of
any new CDL rule to come into
substantial compliance with its
requirements. This would allow the
States time to pass legislation needed to
comply with the new provisions.
Justification for Changes: Armed Forces
Heavy-Vehicle Driver Training Programs
Upon reviewing military driver
training programs, the Agency has
concluded that these programs enable
drivers to maintain a level of safety
equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved by requiring
them to pass the CDL knowledge test.
The Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine
Corps provide specific training
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
dedicated to operating heavy-duty
vehicles.1
There are three basic military job
training classifications, with additional
training for other types of heavy-duty
specialty vehicles (e.g., gasoline haulers,
construction vehicles, and military
equipment transport oversize/
overweight [non-track vehicles]).
The four core training programs for
heavy vehicle operations, based on the
occupational specialty code of the
service member, are:
• Army—88M—Motor Transport
Operator.
• Air Force—2T1—Vehicle
Operations.
• Marine Corps—3531—Motor
Vehicle Operator.
• Navy—EO—Equipment Operator.
Army—88M Training
The 88M Instructor Training Manual
is 142 pages long. The student manual—
STP 55–88M14–SM–TG Soldier’s
Manual and Trainer’s Guide 88M, Motor
Transport Operator—is 229 pages long
and includes four levels of training. The
6-week core curriculum of the Army
88M course contains a total of 221 hours
of training, including:
• Lecture—32 classroom hours.
• Practical application—road
driving—189 hours.
Motor Transport Operators are
primarily responsible for operating
wheeled vehicles to transport personnel
and cargo. Motor Transport Operator
duties include: Interior components/
controls and indicators; basic vehicle
control; driving vehicles over all types
of roads and terrain, traveling alone or
in convoys; braking, coupling, backing,
and alley docking; adverse/tactical
driving operations; pre-trip inspections;
reading load plans; checking oil, fuel
and other fluid levels, as well as tire
pressure; operations in automatic and
manual modes; crash prevention; safety
check procedures; basic vehicle
maintenance and repairs; transporting
hazardous materials; and keeping
mileage records.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Air Force—2T1—Vehicle Operations
The Air Force Tractor Trailer Plan of
Instruction (POI) is 226 pages long. The
minimum length of instruction for the
basic school is 84 hours, including:
• 22 hours of classroom.
• 62 hours of hands-on activity, both
alone on a training pad and on the road
with an instructor.
1 Note: Heavy-duty vehicles is a generic
description used in the military to describe vehicles
that have been determined by FMCSA and the
American Association of Motor Vehicle
Administrators to have weights equal to or larger
than the weights that require a driver to hold a CDL.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
The core curriculum is based on the
material in the American Association of
Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)
CDL Manual—2005 edition (2014
revised). Students participating in the
basic 2T1 curriculum learn general
principles in the classroom. Specialized
training occurs at the installation using
the Tractor Trailer Plan of Instruction.
A minimum of 40 hours over-the-road
time is expected on each vehicle/trailer
type.
Topics covered in the Air Force
Vehicle Operations course include:
Overview of training and Federal
requirements; Federal motor vehicle
safety standards; tractor/trailer design;
hazards and human factors relative to
the environment where used; safety
clothing and equipment; driving safely;
pre- and post-trip vehicle inspection;
basic vehicle control; shifting gears;
managing space and speed; driving in
mountains, fog, winter, very hot
weather, and at night; railroad crossings;
defensive awareness to avoid hazards
and emergencies; skid control and
recovery; what to do in case of a crash;
fires; staying alert and fit to drive;
hazardous materials—rules for all
commercial drivers; preparing,
inspecting, and transporting cargo
safely; inspecting and driving with air
brakes; driving combination vehicles
safely; and coupling and uncoupling.
Marine Corps—3531—Motor Vehicle
Operator
The core curriculum of the Marine
Corps 3531 course—TM 11240–15/3G
contains three training areas:
• Lecture—24 classroom hours.
• Demonstration—classroom/training
pad—35 hours.
• Practical application—road
driving—198 hours.
Instructional breakout includes:
• Demonstration: 35 hours.
• Guided discussion: 1.5 hours.
• Lecture: 24 hours.
• Performance examination: 62
hours.
• Practical application (individual):
198 hours.
• Knowledge examination: 7 hours.
Classroom instruction includes
lectures, demonstration, and practice
time for the specific tasks identified.
Each classroom session includes
knowledge and performance evaluations
to ensure students have mastered all of
the learning objectives for the specialty
proficiency. Training includes both
simulators and actual vehicle operation.
Practical training includes on-the-road
and skills operations, ground guide
procedures, and operating a vehicle
with a towed load. Students practice
their driving and backing, with and
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26897
without a trailer. Instructors ride with
the students as they operate on
approved road routes. Specific training
areas (pads) are set aside for the
students to practice their backing skills
and ground guide procedures safely.
The Marine Corps training curriculum
also includes emergency procedures and
cargo loading.
Navy—EO—Equipment Operator
The core curriculum of the USN
Heavy Vehicle Operator (Truck Driver)
(EO) course (53–3032.00) is designed to
train Navy personnel how to operate
passenger and cargo vehicles to rated
capacity. They palletize, containerize,
load and safely transport various types
of cargo and demonstrate knowledge
and skills for qualifying as a driver
journeyman. The complete program
covers topics including:
• Hazardous materials transportation
• Line haul planning
• Manual tractor-truck operations
• Vehicle Recovery Operations
The course is taught over 160 hours
including 30 hours classroom and 130
hours lab (behind the wheel). By
completing this course, the Navy driver
will be able to:
• Perform the duties of normal, noncombat conditions driving in
accordance with the local state driver
licensing agency’s CDL driver
handbook;
• Manage hazardous petroleum, oils
and lubricants (POL) material required
during line haul and worksite activities,
to support normal, non-combat
operations;
• Perform preventive maintenance on
a non- or up-armored manual truck
tractor with drop-neck trailer, consisting
of pre-start, during-operations, and
after-operations equipment checks, to
support normal, non-combat operations,
in accordance with local State Driver
License Agency CDL handbooks;
• Operate vehicle controls of a nonor up-armored manual truck-tractor, to
support normal, non-combat operations;
and
• Be proficient with the components
and controls of a drop-neck trailer
relative to a detached/attached
gooseneck and a coupled/uncoupled
trailer.
Other topics covered within the Navy
EO training program include:
• Development and maintenance of
operational records
• Operation of high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles
• Weight distribution and load
securement
• Loading bulk and container cargo
• Preventive maintenance
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
26898
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
• Pre- and post-trip vehicle safety
inspections
The military training programs
described above are thorough and
comprehensive. They incorporate most
of the elements recommended by the
Professional Truck Driver Institute,
which has been the principal standardsetting organization for private-sector
motor carrier training for decades. They
are also entirely compatible with the
requirements of FMCSA’s recentlyadopted ELDT rule. Although geared to
heavy-duty military vehicles, military
training is readily transferrable to a
civilian context, since the operational
characteristics of large military and
civilian vehicles are very similar and, in
some cases, identical. The Agency
believes that exempting these drivers
from the CLP knowledge test, in
addition to the skills test, will have no
adverse effect on highway safety.
VI. Removal of Regulatory Guidance
FMCSA’s previous regulatory
guidance for § 383.77 was removed
when the Agency’s guidance for 49 CFR
parts 383 and 384 was revised and
reissued; see ‘‘Commercial Driver’s
License Standards, Requirements and
Penalties; Regulatory Guidance’’ (DATE
XX FR XXXX).
VII. International Impacts
The FMCSRs, and any exceptions to
the FMCSRs, apply only within the
United States (and, in some cases,
United States territories). Motor carriers
and drivers are subject to the laws and
regulations of the countries in which
they operate, unless an international
agreement states otherwise. Drivers and
carriers should be aware of the
regulatory differences among nations.
VIII. Section-by-Section
§ 383.23
Commercial Driver’s License
The reference to ‘‘written’’ tests in
paragraph (a)(1) would be changed to
‘‘knowledge’’ tests to match the
terminology used elsewhere in part 383.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 383.77 Substitute for Driving Skills
Tests for Drivers With Military CMV
Experience
Section 383.77(a)(1) would be revised
to state that an applicant may not have
held two civilian licenses
simultaneously, in addition to a military
license.
§ 383.79 Skills Testing of Out-of-State
Students; Knowledge Test Waivers for
Certain Military Personnel
The title of this section would be
amended slightly, while paragraph (a),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
CDL applicants trained out-of-State,
would not be modified.
Existing paragraph (b), Military
service member applicants for a CLP or
CDL, would be removed and replaced by
a new paragraph (b), Knowledge test
waivers for certain current or former
military service members applying for a
CLP or CDL.
Existing paragraph (b)(1) would be
redesignated as proposed paragraph (c).
A new paragraph, In general, would be
added as paragraph (b)(1).
Existing paragraph (b)(2) would be
redesignated as proposed paragraph (d).
A new paragraph, Conditions and
limitations, would be added as
paragraph (b)(2), outlining the
requirements to apply for a waiver of
the knowledge test.
Redesignated paragraph (c) would
retain the content of current paragraph
(b)(1), State of duty station, but with
some editorial changes.
New paragraph (d), Electronic
transmission, is currently codified as
paragraph (b)(2).
New paragraph (e), State of domicile,
would be revised to reflect the new
waiver options proposed by this NPRM.
§ 384.301 Substantial Compliance
General Requirements
This proposed rule would not alter
the existing paragraphs in this section.
Paragraph (l) is added.
IX. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O.
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) as supplemented by
E.O. 13563 and DOT policies and
procedures, FMCSA must determine
whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant,’’ and therefore subject to
OMB review and the requirements of
the E.O. The Order defines ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one likely to result
in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal government or
communities.
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Agency.
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the E.O.
FMCSA has determined that this
action is not a significant regulatory
action within the meaning of E.O. 12866
or significant within the meaning of
Department of Transportation regulatory
policies and procedures. However,
FMCSA did evaluate the costs and
benefits of this proposed rulemaking.
This proposed rulemaking would not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, lead
to a major increase in costs or prices, or
have significant adverse effects on the
United States economy.
Costs and Benefits
FMCSA evaluated potential costs and
benefits associated with this proposed
rulemaking. The Agency concludes that
costs, if any, would be minimal and are
non-quantifiable, while benefits would
be realized by certain current and
former military service members
transitioning into civilian careers
driving CMVs, as well as by their
potential employers. Due to the
voluntary nature of the proposed rule
and potential variations across States
with respect to conditions and
limitations imposed beyond those of
§ 383.79, the Agency is unable to
quantify these benefits.
Section 383.79(b)
The proposed rule would allow States
to waive the requirement in
§ 383.23(a)(1) that an applicant must
pass a knowledge test for a CLP,
including waiver of the knowledge test
for a CLP required by § 383.111, for
certain current or former military
service members. This proposed rule
would allow States to provide waivers
of the knowledge test, if the individual
can certify and provide evidence that
during the 1-year period immediately
prior to the application he or she met
the criteria outlined in § 383.79.
Under the proposed rule, certain
active-duty military service members
may submit an application to the SDLA
in their State of duty station for a CLP
or CDL, including an application for a
waiver of the knowledge test, upon prior
agreement between respective SDLAs in
the State of duty station and State of
domicile. This proposed rule is
therefore expected to result in time
savings to active-duty service members
equivalent to the amount of time that
would otherwise be spent preparing for
and taking the knowledge test. The
Agency cannot quantify the aggregate
extent of such time savings, as the
proposed rule would not require States
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
to accept applications for waivers of the
knowledge test; nor can the Agency
know what conditions and limitations
States may impose on applicants
beyond those of this proposed rule.
However, the Agency considers it likely
that those States that elect to accept
applications for waivers of the driving
skills test would also accept
applications for waivers of the
knowledge test following
implementation of the proposed rule,
subject to similar conditions and
limitations. If the proposed rule
encourages additional active-duty
military service members to seek
civilian employment as drivers
following their completion of military
service, their potential employers may
benefit from an increase in the labor
supply; however, the Agency is likewise
unable to quantify this benefit due to
the reasons cited above.
Certain former military service
members seeking to transition into
civilian employment as a driver may
benefit under the proposed rule by no
longer having to possess a CLP for 14
days before either taking the driving
skills test or applying for a waiver of the
driving skills test. Provided that their
State of domicile would accept
applications for waivers of both the
knowledge test and the skills test, such
former military service members may
apply simultaneously for both. As noted
above, the Agency considers it likely
that States that elect to accept
applications for waivers of the driving
skills test would also accept
applications for waivers of the
knowledge test following
implementation of the proposed rule,
subject to similar conditions and
limitations. By providing an expedited
path to enter the labor market, the rule
allows certain former service members
to benefit from faster access to jobs,
while their potential employers may
benefit from faster access to those
individuals’ labor hours. As with certain
active-duty military service members,
certain former military service members
who obtain waivers of the knowledge
test would also incur time savings
equivalent to the time that would
otherwise be spent preparing for and
taking the knowledge test. Due to the
voluntary nature of this proposed rule
and uncertainty regarding conditions
and limitations States may impose on
applicants beyond that of § 383.79, the
Agency cannot estimate the aggregate
value of these benefits to certain former
military service members or their
potential employers.
In considering the costs of the
proposed rule, the Agency notes that the
NPRM would allow the State of duty
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
26899
station (for active service members) to
transmit completed applications to the
State of domicile by a direct, secure, and
efficient electronic system. Completed
applications are to include any
supporting documents pertinent to the
waiver(s) being sought and—if the State
of domicile has not exercised its waiver
option—the results of any knowledge
and skills tests administered. This
proposed rule does not require the
creation of or significant modification to
existing communication methods
between SDLAs. At present,
transmissions between a State of duty
station and State of domicile are already
subject to identical requirements with
respect to secure electronic transmission
of completed applications under
§ 383.79(c). The Agency expects de
minimis modifications may be needed
depending on individual State
variations (if any) in documentation that
would be required for applications for
knowledge test waivers. The de minimis
expectation is rooted in the assumption
that States will take a pragmatic
approach by requiring the same
documentation for a knowledge test
waiver application as for a skills test
waiver application.
of the RFA allows an agency to certify,
in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the
proposed rulemaking is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The primary entities affected by this
proposed rule would be certain current
and former military service members
and SDLAs. Under the standards of the
RFA, as amended by the SBREFA, none
of these are small entities. Therefore,
FMCSA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Incidentally,
the proposed rule’s impacts on current
and former military service members
would be entirely beneficial by allowing
States to provide more flexibility to
those seeking to obtain a CDL. With
respect to costs, the impacts on SDLAs
that choose to exercise the waiver
option are estimated to be de minimis.
Accordingly, I hereby certify that this
proposed rule, if promulgated, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
FMCSA invites comment from members
of the public who believe there will be
a significant impact on small entities
from this action.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small
Entities)
C. Assistance for Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104–121, 110 Stat.
857), requires Federal agencies to
consider the impact of their regulatory
proposals on small entities, analyze
effective alternatives that minimize
small entity impacts, and make their
analyses available for public comment.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ means small
businesses and not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with a
population of less than 50,000.2
Accordingly, DOT policy requires an
analysis of the impact of all regulations
on small entities, and mandates that
agencies strive to lessen any adverse
effects on these entities.
When an agency issues a rulemaking
proposal, the RFA requires the agency to
‘‘prepare and make available for public
comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis’’ which will ‘‘describe the
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities’’ (5 U.S.C. 603(a)). Section 605
2 Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Available at: https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/
regulatory-flexibility-act (accessed December 14,
2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In accordance with section 213(a) of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
FMCSA wants to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
themselves and participate in the
rulemaking initiative. If the proposed
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance; please consult the FMCSA
point of contact, Selden Fritschner,
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce or otherwise determine
compliance with Federal regulations to
the Small Business Administration’s
Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of FMCSA, call 1–888–REG–
FAIR (1–888–734–3247). DOT has a
policy regarding the rights of small
entities to regulatory enforcement
fairness and an explicit policy against
retaliation for exercising these rights.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
26900
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$156 million (which is the equivalent of
$100 million in 1995, adjusted for
inflation to 2015 levels) or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule
would not result in such expenditure,
the Agency does discuss the effects of
the proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection
Information)
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
F. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for
Federalism under Section 1(a) of E.O.
13132 if it has ‘‘substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
FMCSA has determined that this
proposed rule would not have
substantial direct costs on or for the
States, nor will it limit the policymaking
discretion of the States. This proposed
rule does not preempt any State law or
regulation. Therefore, this proposed rule
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Impact Statement.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
H. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
E.O. 13045, Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), requires agencies issuing
‘‘economically significant’’ rules, if the
regulation also concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
an agency has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, to
include an evaluation of the regulation’s
environmental health and safety effects
on children. The Agency determined
this proposed rule is not economically
significant. Therefore, no analysis of the
impacts on children is required. In any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
event, this regulatory action does not in
any respect present an environmental
health or safety risk that could
disproportionately affect children.
I. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private
Property)
FMCSA reviewed this proposed rule
in accordance with E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and has determined it will not
effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications.
J. Privacy
The Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2005, (Pub. L. 108–447, 118 Stat. 2809,
3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note) requires the
Agency to conduct a privacy impact
assessment (PIA) of a regulation that
will affect the privacy of individuals.
Because this proposed rule does not
require the collection of personally
identifiable information (PII), the
Agency is not required to conduct a PIA.
The E-Government Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–347, 208, 116 Stat.
2899, 2921 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires
Federal agencies to conduct a PIA for
new or substantially changed
technology that collects, maintains, or
disseminates information in an
identifiable form. No new or
substantially changed technology would
collect, maintain, or disseminate
information as a result of this rule.
Accordingly, FMCSA has not conducted
a PIA.
K. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental
Review)
The regulations implementing E.O.
12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this program.
L. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed
rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Agency has
determined that the rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under that
order because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
it does not require a Statement of Energy
Effects under E.O. 13211.
M. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal
Governments)
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
N. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through OMB, with
an explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods;
sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) are
standards that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, FMCSA
did not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
O. Environment (NEPA, CAA,
Environmental Justice)
FMCSA analyzed this NPRM for the
purpose of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and determined this action is
categorically excluded from further
analysis and documentation in an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under
FMCSA Order 5610.1 (69 FR 9680,
March 1, 2004), Appendix 2, paragraphs
6.s.(6) and 6.t.(2). The Categorical
Exclusion (CE) in paragraph 6.s.(6)
covers a requirement for States to give
knowledge and skills tests to all
qualified applicants for commercial
drivers’ licenses which meet the Federal
standard. The CE in paragraph 6.t.(2)
covers regulations to ensure that the
States comply with the provisions of the
Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of
1986, by: (2) Having the appropriate
laws, regulations, programs, policies,
procedures and information systems
concerning the qualification and
licensing of persons who apply for a
commercial driver’s license, and
persons who are issued a commercial
driver’s license. The requirements in
this proposed rule are covered by these
CEs and the proposed action does not
have any effect on the quality of the
environment. The CE determination is
available for inspection or copying in
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
FMCSA also analyzed this proposed
rule under the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA), section 176(c) (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), and implementing
regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency.
Approval of this action is exempt from
the CAA’s general conformity
requirement since it does not affect
direct or indirect emissions of criteria
pollutants.
Under E.O. 12898, each Federal
agency must identify and address, as
appropriate, ‘‘disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations’’ in the United States, its
possessions, and territories. FMCSA
evaluated the environmental justice
effects of this proposed rule in
accordance with the E.O., and has
determined that no environmental
justice issue is associated with this
proposed rule, nor is there any
collective environmental impact that
would result from its promulgation.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 383
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
49 CFR Part 384
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
In consideration of the foregoing,
FMCSA amends 49 CFR chapter III,
parts 383 and 384 to read as follows:
PART 383—COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S
LICENSE STANDARDS;
REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES
1. The authority citation for part 383
is revised to read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et
seq., and 31502; secs. 214 and 215 of Pub. L.
106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec.
1012(b) of Pub. L. 107–56; 115 Stat. 272, 297,
sec. 4140 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144,
1746; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat.
405, 830; secs. 5401 and 7208 of Pub. L. 114–
94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1546, 1593; and 49 CFR
1.87.
2. Amend § 383.23 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 383.23
Commercial driver’s license.
(a) General rule.
(1) No person shall operate a
commercial motor vehicle unless such
person has taken and passed knowledge
and driving tests for a CLP or CDL that
meet the Federal standards contained in
subparts F, G, and H of this part for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
commercial motor vehicle that person
operates or expects to operate.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 383.77 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 383.77 Substitute for driving skills tests
for drivers with military CMV experience.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) Has not simultaneously held more
than one civilian license (in addition to
a military license);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 383.79 by revising the
section heading and paragraph (b) and
adding paragraphs (c) through (e) to
read as follows:
§ 383.79 Skills testing of out-of-state
students; knowledge test waivers for
certain military personnel.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Knowledge test waivers for certain
current or former military service
members applying for a CLP or CDL—
(1) In general.—For certain current or
former military service members, as
defined in § 383.5, who meet the
conditions and limitations set forth in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a State
may waive the requirement in
§ 383.23(a)(1) that a CDL applicant must
pass a knowledge test for a CLP or CDL,
including waiver of the knowledge
required by § 383.111.
(2) Conditions and limitations.—A
current or former military service
member applying for waiver of the
knowledge test described in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section must certify and
provide evidence that, during the 1-year
period immediately prior to the
application, he/she:
(i) Is or was regularly employed in a
military position requiring operation of
a CMV;
(ii) Is operating a vehicle
representative of the CMV the driver
applicant expects to operate upon
separation from the military, or operated
such a vehicle immediately preceding
separation from the military;
(iii) Has not simultaneously held
more than one civilian license (in
addition to a military license);
(iv) Has not had any license
suspended, revoked, or cancelled;
(v) Has not had any convictions for
any type of motor vehicle for the
disqualifying offenses contained in
§ 383.51(b);
(vi) Has not had more than one
conviction for any type of motor vehicle
for serious traffic violations contained
in § 383.51(c); and
(vii) Has not had any conviction for a
violation of military, State or local law
relating to motor vehicle traffic control
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26901
(other than a parking violation) arising
in connection with any traffic accident,
and has no record of an accident in
which he/she was at fault.
(c) Role of State of duty station.—A
State where active duty military service
members are stationed, but not
domiciled, may, upon prior agreement
with the State of domicile:
(1) Accept an application for a CLP or
CDL, including an application for
waiver of the knowledge test prescribed
in paragraph (b)(1)) of this section, from
such a military service member who
(i) Is regularly employed or was
regularly employed within the last year
in a military position requiring
operation of a CMV;
(ii) Has a valid driver’s license from
his or her State of domicile;
(iii) Has a valid active duty military
identification card; and
(iv) Has a current copy of either the
service member’s military leave and
earnings statement, or his or her orders.
(2) Either
(i) Administer the knowledge and
skills tests to the military service
member, as appropriate, in accordance
with subparts F, G and H of this part,
if the State of domicile requires those
tests; or
(ii) Waive the knowledge and skills
tests in accordance with § 383.77 and
this section, if the State of domicile has
exercised the option to waive those
tests; and
(3) Destroy the military service
member’s driver’s license on behalf of
the State of domicile, unless the latter
requires the driver’s license to be
surrendered to its own driver licensing
agency.
(d) Requirement for electronic
transmission.—The State of duty station
must transmit to the State of domicile
by a direct, secure, and efficient
electronic system the completed
application, any supporting documents,
and—if the State of domicile has not
exercised its waiver option—the results
of any knowledge and skills
administered.
(e) Role of State of domicile.—Upon
completion of the applicant’s
application pursuant to § 383.71 and
any testing administered by the State of
duty station pursuant to §§ 383.71 and
383.73, the State of domicile of the
military service member applying for a
CLP or CDL may
(1) Accept the completed application,
any supporting documents, and the
results of the knowledge and skills tests
administered by the State of duty station
(unless waived at the discretion of the
State of domicile); and
(2) Issue the applicant a CLP or CDL.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
26902
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules
PART 384—STATE COMPLIANCE
WITH COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S
LICENSE PROGRAM
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
5. The authority citation for part 384
is revised to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31301 et seq.,
and 31502; secs. 103 and 215 of Pub. L. 106–
59, 113 Stat. 1753, 1767; sec. 32934 of Pub.
L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; sec. 5401 and
5524 of Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1546,
1560; and 49 CFR 1.87.
6. Add paragraph (l) to § 384.301 to
read as follows:
■
§ 384.301 Substantial compliance general
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) A State must come into substantial
compliance with the requirements of
subpart B of this part and part 383 of
this chapter in effect as of [EFFECTIVE
DATE OF FINAL RULE] as soon as
practicable, but, unless otherwise
specifically provided in this part, not
later than [DATE 3 YEARS AFTER THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL
RULE].
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.87 on: June 6, 2017.
Daphne Y. Jefferson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–12079 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 160728670–6904–01]
RIN 0648–BG23
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Highly Migratory Fisheries; California
Drift Gillnet Fishery; Protected Species
Hard Caps for the California/Oregon
Large-Mesh Drift Gillnet Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) withdraws a
proposed rule proposing to establish
strict limits, termed ‘‘hard caps,’’ for the
California/Oregon large-mesh drift
gillnet (DGN) fishery on interactions
with certain protected species under
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
authority. NMFS published the
proposed rule in the Federal Register on
October 13, 2016. After careful
consideration, NMFS has decided that
the proposed changes discussed in the
proposed rule are not warranted at this
time.
DATES: The proposed rule published on
October 13, 2016 (81 FR 70660), is
withdrawn as of June 12, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyle
Enriquez, West Coast Region, NMFS,
(562) 980–4025, lyle.enriquez@
noaa.gov.
In
September 2015, the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
recommended NMFS implement
regulations for the DGN fishery that
included two-year rolling hard caps on
observed mortality and injury to certain
protected species during the May 1 to
January 31 fishing season each year. The
Council transmitted its proposed
regulations for implementing hard caps
to NMFS on September 23, 2016. Under
the proposed regulations, caps would
have been established for five marine
mammal species and four sea turtle
species. When any of the caps were
reached, the fishery would have been
closed for the rest of the fishing season
and possibly through the following
season. The length of any closure would
have depended on when during the twoyear period a cap was reached.
NMFS published a proposed rule to
implement the Council’s
recommendation to establish protected
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
species hard caps in the Federal
Register on October 13, 2016, (81 FR
70660). Supporting documents included
a draft Environmental Assessment (EA),
an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, and draft Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR). During the proposed
rule’s comment period, NMFS received
a request to extend the comment period.
On November 23, 2016, NMFS
published a notice in the Federal
Register extending the end-date of the
comment period for the proposed rule
from November 28, 2016 to December
28, 2016 (81 FR 84546).
Following public comment, NMFS
completed a final EA, Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, and RIR (posted at
https://www.regulations.gov/
docket?D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0123). As
a result of its analysis of the effects of
the proposed rule, NMFS has decided
that the changes covered in the
proposed rule from 2016 are not
warranted at this time. Therefore, NMFS
is withdrawing the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
October 13, 2016 (81 FR 70660).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 7, 2017.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–12070 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26894-26902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12079]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 383, 384
[Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0047]
RIN 2126-AB99
Military Licensing and State Commercial Driver's License
Reciprocity
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would allow State Driver Licensing Agencies
(SDLAs) to waive the requirements for the commercial driver's license
(CDL) knowledge tests for certain individuals who are, or were,
regularly employed within the last year in a military position that
requires/required, the operation of a commercial motor vehicle (CMV).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received on or before August 11,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Docket Number FMCSA-
2017-0047 using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for instructions on submitting
comments, including collection of information comments for the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Selden Fritschner, CDL Division,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001, by email at Selden.fritschner@dot.gov,
or by telephone at 202-366-0677. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone
(202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
C. Privacy Act
D. Waiver of Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Executive Summary
III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
IV. Regulatory Background
A. Current Standards
B. Recent Activity
V. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
VI. Removal of Regulatory Guidance
VII. International Impacts
VIII. Section-by-Section
IX. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review), E.O. 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review),
and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small Entities)
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection of Information)
F. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
G. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
H. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
I. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
J. Privacy
K. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
L. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
M. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
N. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
O. Environment (NEPA, CAA, Environmental Justice)
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
NPRM (Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0047), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each section applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that FMCSA can contact you if there are questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
put the docket number, FMCSA-2017-0047, in the keyword box, and click
``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on the ``Comment Now!''
button and type your comment into the text box on the following screen.
Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual or on
behalf of a third party and then submit.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope.
FMCSA will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your
comments. FMCSA may issue a final rule at any time after the close of
the comment period.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Insert the docket number, FMCSA-2017-0047, in the
keyword box, and click ``Search.'' Next, click the ``Open Docket
Folder'' button and choose the document to review. If you do not have
access to the Internet, you may view the docket online by visiting the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
C. Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
D. Waiver of Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Under section 5202 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation
Act, Public Law 114-94 (FAST Act), if a regulatory proposal is likely
to lead to the promulgation of a major rule, agencies are required to
start the process
[[Page 26895]]
with an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) or a negotiated
rulemaking, unless the Agency finds good cause that an ANPRM is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. This
NPRM is not subject to these provisions because it is not likely to
lead to the promulgation of a major rule.
II. Executive Summary
This proposed rule would allow SDLAs to waive the requirements for
a knowledge test for certain individuals who are regularly employed, or
were regularly employed within the last year, in a military position
requiring the operation of a CMV. This rulemaking implements part of
section 5401 of the FAST Act.
Today's proposed rule, in combination with a recent rulemaking--
Commercial Driver's License Requirements of the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) and the Military Commercial
Driver's License Act of 2012, published on October 13, 2016, (81 FR
70634), hereafter referred to as the Military CDL I Rule--would give
States the option to waive both the CDL knowledge and skills tests for
certain current and former military service members who received
training in the operation of CMVs during active-duty or reserve service
in military vehicles that are comparable to CMVs. The combined effect
of the Military CDL I Rule and this proposal would allow certain
current or former military drivers, domiciled in participating States,
to transition more quickly from the armed forces to civilian driving
careers.
FMCSA evaluated potential costs and benefits associated with this
proposed rulemaking. The Agency concluded that costs, if any, would be
minimal and are not quantifiable, while benefits would accrue primarily
to certain current and former military service members transitioning
into civilian careers as CMV drivers, and secondarily to their
potential employers. Because the proposed rule is voluntary--States are
not required to waive the knowledge and/or skills tests--potential
variations among States with respect to conditions and limitations
imposed beyond those of this proposed rule could be substantial. The
Agency is unable to quantify these benefits.
III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This rulemaking rests on the authority of the Commercial Motor
Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (CMVSA), as amended, codified at 49 U.S.C.
chapter 313 and 49 CFR parts 382, 383, and 384. The NPRM also responds
to section 5401(a) of the FAST Act [Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312,
1546, December 4, 2015]. This section requires FMCSA to modify the
minimum testing standards of its CDL regulations to credit the training
and knowledge that certain current or former military drivers received
in the armed forces, including the reserve components and National
Guard, in order to drive military vehicles similar to civilian CMVs [49
U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C)].
The CMVSA provides broadly that ``[t]he Secretary of Transportation
shall prescribe regulations on minimum standards for testing and
ensuring the fitness of an individual operating a commercial motor
vehicle'' [49 U.S.C. 31305(a)]. In general, those regulations must
include (1) minimum standards for knowledge and driving (skills) tests,
(2) use of a representative vehicle to take the driving test, (3)
minimum testing standards, and (4) working knowledge of CMV regulations
and vehicle safety systems [49 U.S.C. 31305(a)(1)-(4)].
Section 5401(a) of the FAST Act added 49 U.S.C. 31305(d):
``Standards for Training and Testing of Veteran Operators.'' Section
31305(d)(1)(A) required the Agency to modify its CDL regulations to
``exempt a covered individual from all or a portion of a driving test
if the covered individual had experience in the armed forces or reserve
components driving vehicles similar to a commercial motor vehicle.''
Section 31305(d)(1)(B) required FMCSA to ``ensure that a covered
individual may apply for an exemption under subparagraph (A) during, at
least, the 1-year period beginning on the date on which such individual
separates from services in the armed forces or reserve components.''
The term ``reserve components'' includes the Army and Air National
Guard. Section 5401(c) also directed the Agency to adopt regulations
allowing certain military personnel an exemption from the normal CDL
domicile requirement, as authorized by the Military Commercial Driver's
License Act of 2012 [Military CDL Act] and codified at 49 U.S.C.
31311(a)(12)(C). These three provisions were implemented by the
Military CDL I Rule.
The last element of section 5401(a), which was not addressed in the
Military CDL I Rule, directed the Agency to ``credit the training and
knowledge a covered individual received in the armed forces or reserve
components driving vehicles similar to a commercial motor vehicle for
purposes of satisfying minimum standards for training and knowledge''
[49 U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C)]. That requirement is the subject of this
NPRM. It should be noted that section 31305(d)(2)(B) defines a
``covered individual'' as someone over 21 years of age who is ``(i) a
former member of the armed forces; or (ii) a former member of the
reserve components'' [emphasis added]. Limitation of the ``credit'' to
be conferred by section 5401(a) to former members of the active-duty
armed forces is at least understandable, since active-duty service
members would presumably not have enough off-duty time to engage in
civilian driving requiring a CDL. However, limiting that ``credit'' to
former members of the reserve components would exclude large numbers of
current reservist drivers who received the same rigorous military CMV
training as active-duty personnel but perform military service only
part-time, while holding full-time civilian jobs. Because the clear
objective of section 5401(a) is to make it easier for trained military
drivers to obtain CDLs and move into civilian driving careers, and
because the word ``former'' in the definition of a ``covered
individual'' largely defeats the purpose of the statute, FMCSA has
concluded that it would be appropriate to expand the eligible
population. This NPRM would therefore allow SDLAs to waive the
knowledge test for both current and former service members who had
undergone certain CMV driver training while serving in the military.
Using the broad authority of 49 U.S.C. 31315(b), the Agency took the
same position (without comment) in granting all SDLAs the temporary
option (for a 2-year period) of waiving the CDL knowledge test for
current or former members of the military services, including the
reserves and National Guard, who had completed certain formal military
driver training (81 FR 74861, Oct. 27, 2016).
Federal training standards for CMV drivers were adopted only
recently. Section 32304 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP-21) [Pub. L. 112-141, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 405,
791] required entry-level driver training (ELDT) of CDL applicants [49
U.S.C. 31305(c)]. That requirement was promulgated on December 8, 2016
[81 FR 88732]. However, the ELDT rule provides that ``(3) Veterans with
military CMV experience who meet all the requirements and conditions of
Sec. 383.77 of this chapter'' are not required to complete the new
entry-level training program [49 CFR 380.603(a)(3)]. Because Sec.
383.77 authorizes the States to exempt CDL applicants with military CMV
experience from the driving skills test, those drivers are also exempt
from ELDT.
[[Page 26896]]
Under 49 CFR 383.77, as amended by the Military CDL I Rule, the
Agency now provides partial credit for military drivers' training and
knowledge by allowing States to exempt from the CDL driving skills test
those employees who are or were regularly employed within the last year
in a military position requiring the operation of a military vehicle
that is comparable to a CMV.
This NPRM would implement 49 U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C) by giving States
the discretion (subject to certain limits) to exempt CDL applicants
with military CMV experience from the knowledge test required for a
commercial learner's permit (CLP). This NPRM would complete the
requirement of section 31305(d)(1)(C) to ``credit the training and
knowledge a covered individual received in the armed forces or reserve
components driving vehicles similar to a commercial motor vehicle for
purposes of satisfying minimum standards for training and knowledge.''
IV. Regulatory Background
A. Current Standards
Knowledge Test
As specified in 49 CFR 383.71(a)(2)(ii), any individual applying
for a CDL or CLP is required to take and pass a general knowledge test.
The general knowledge test must meet the Federal standards contained in
subparts F, G, and H of part 383 for the commercial vehicle group that
person operates or expects to operate.
Skills Test
A final rule published on May 9, 2011 [``Commercial Driver's
License Testing and Commercial Learner's Permit Standards'' (76 FR
26854)] added new 49 CFR 383.77, which allowed the States to substitute
CDL applicants' eligible military CMV experience for the skills test.
B. Recent Activity
Military CDL I Rule
The Military CDL I Rule addressed the requirements of 49 U.S.C.
31305(d)(1)(A) and (B) (81 FR 70634). That rule allowed States to
extend from 90 days to 1 year the period of time for an individual who
is regularly employed or was regularly employed in a position requiring
operation of a CMV to apply for a skills test waiver after leaving the
military.
Additionally, the Military CDL I Rule allowed the SDLA in the State
where military personnel are stationed (State of duty station) to
coordinate with the State of domicile to expedite the processing of
applications and administer the knowledge and skills tests for a CLP or
CDL. The SDLA in the State of domicile could then issue the CLP or CDL
on the basis of tests performed by the SDLA in the State of duty
station.
Knowledge Test Exemption Request
The Missouri Department of Revenue (DOR) submitted a request for an
exemption from the FMCSA regulation that requires any driver to pass
the general knowledge test before being issued a CLP or CDL. The
request is available in docket FMCSA-2016-0130, or at: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FMCSA-2016-0130-0004. The Missouri DOR
asked FMCSA to waive the knowledge test requirement for qualified
veterans who participated in dedicated training through approved
military programs. The Missouri DOR contended that qualified personnel
who participated in such programs had already received the numerous
hours of classroom training, practical skills, and one-on-one road
training that are essential for safe driving. Upon reviewing the
request, FMCSA agreed with Missouri DOR's reasoning and granted a two-
year exemption on October 27, 2016 (81 FR 74861). The Agency extended
the exemption to allow all SDLAs, at their discretion, to waive the
knowledge test requirements to qualified veterans, reservists, National
Guard, and active-duty personnel.
V. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking
This NPRM addresses the third requirement of section 5401(a) of the
FAST Act [49 U.S.C. 31305(d)(1)(C)] by proposing to allow SDLAs to
exempt certain personnel from the CDL knowledge test. Those personnel
are drivers who are regularly employed, or were regularly employed
within the last year, in a military position requiring operation of a
military vehicle comparable to a CMV, and who completed an approved
military driver training program. FMCSA believes that this proposal
would maintain a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved by requiring military-trained drivers to
pass the knowledge test.
Sec. 383.23 Commercial Driver's License
The reference to ``written'' tests in Sec. 383.23(a)(1) would be
changed to ``knowledge'' tests to be consistent with terminology used
elsewhere in part 383.
Sec. 383.77 Substitute for Driving Skills Tests for Drivers With
Military CMV Experience
Section 383.77(a)(1) would be revised to match proposed section
383.79(b)(2)(iii) and to avoid the unintended implication of the
reference to ``not . . . more than one license.'' That original
language could be misread to disqualify from the skills test waiver a
driver who, in the two years immediately before applying for a CDL,
moved from one State to another and held licenses sequentially, but not
simultaneously, from both States. The proposed language makes it clear
that an applicant cannot simultaneously have held more than one
civilian license, in addition to a military license.
Sec. 383.79 Skills Testing of Out-of-State Students; Knowledge Test
Waivers for Military Personnel
The proposal would amend Sec. 383.79(b) to allow States to waive
the CLP knowledge test for certain current or former military service
members (subject to certain conditions and limitations) who were
regularly employed in a military position requiring the operation of a
CMV during the year immediately preceding the license application. The
conditions imposed on the waiver are essentially those included in
Sec. 383.77 when that provision was adopted in 2011.
Like the Military CDL I Rule, this proposed rule would be
permissive, i.e., the States would be allowed, but not required, to
exercise the waiver option.
Sec. 384.301 Substantial Compliance General Requirements
FMCSA would amend 49 CFR 384.301 by adding paragraph (l),
specifying a 3-year compliance date for States. FMCSA has always
allowed the States 3 years after the effective date of any new CDL rule
to come into substantial compliance with its requirements. This would
allow the States time to pass legislation needed to comply with the new
provisions.
Justification for Changes: Armed Forces Heavy-Vehicle Driver Training
Programs
Upon reviewing military driver training programs, the Agency has
concluded that these programs enable drivers to maintain a level of
safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved
by requiring them to pass the CDL knowledge test. The Army, Air Force,
Navy, and Marine Corps provide specific training
[[Page 26897]]
dedicated to operating heavy-duty vehicles.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Note: Heavy-duty vehicles is a generic description used in
the military to describe vehicles that have been determined by FMCSA
and the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators to have
weights equal to or larger than the weights that require a driver to
hold a CDL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are three basic military job training classifications, with
additional training for other types of heavy-duty specialty vehicles
(e.g., gasoline haulers, construction vehicles, and military equipment
transport oversize/overweight [non-track vehicles]).
The four core training programs for heavy vehicle operations, based
on the occupational specialty code of the service member, are:
Army--88M--Motor Transport Operator.
Air Force--2T1--Vehicle Operations.
Marine Corps--3531--Motor Vehicle Operator.
Navy--EO--Equipment Operator.
Army--88M Training
The 88M Instructor Training Manual is 142 pages long. The student
manual--STP 55-88M14-SM-TG Soldier's Manual and Trainer's Guide 88M,
Motor Transport Operator--is 229 pages long and includes four levels of
training. The 6-week core curriculum of the Army 88M course contains a
total of 221 hours of training, including:
Lecture--32 classroom hours.
Practical application--road driving--189 hours.
Motor Transport Operators are primarily responsible for operating
wheeled vehicles to transport personnel and cargo. Motor Transport
Operator duties include: Interior components/controls and indicators;
basic vehicle control; driving vehicles over all types of roads and
terrain, traveling alone or in convoys; braking, coupling, backing, and
alley docking; adverse/tactical driving operations; pre-trip
inspections; reading load plans; checking oil, fuel and other fluid
levels, as well as tire pressure; operations in automatic and manual
modes; crash prevention; safety check procedures; basic vehicle
maintenance and repairs; transporting hazardous materials; and keeping
mileage records.
Air Force--2T1--Vehicle Operations
The Air Force Tractor Trailer Plan of Instruction (POI) is 226
pages long. The minimum length of instruction for the basic school is
84 hours, including:
22 hours of classroom.
62 hours of hands-on activity, both alone on a training
pad and on the road with an instructor.
The core curriculum is based on the material in the American
Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) CDL Manual--2005
edition (2014 revised). Students participating in the basic 2T1
curriculum learn general principles in the classroom. Specialized
training occurs at the installation using the Tractor Trailer Plan of
Instruction. A minimum of 40 hours over-the-road time is expected on
each vehicle/trailer type.
Topics covered in the Air Force Vehicle Operations course include:
Overview of training and Federal requirements; Federal motor vehicle
safety standards; tractor/trailer design; hazards and human factors
relative to the environment where used; safety clothing and equipment;
driving safely; pre- and post-trip vehicle inspection; basic vehicle
control; shifting gears; managing space and speed; driving in
mountains, fog, winter, very hot weather, and at night; railroad
crossings; defensive awareness to avoid hazards and emergencies; skid
control and recovery; what to do in case of a crash; fires; staying
alert and fit to drive; hazardous materials--rules for all commercial
drivers; preparing, inspecting, and transporting cargo safely;
inspecting and driving with air brakes; driving combination vehicles
safely; and coupling and uncoupling.
Marine Corps--3531--Motor Vehicle Operator
The core curriculum of the Marine Corps 3531 course--TM 11240-15/3G
contains three training areas:
Lecture--24 classroom hours.
Demonstration--classroom/training pad--35 hours.
Practical application--road driving--198 hours.
Instructional breakout includes:
Demonstration: 35 hours.
Guided discussion: 1.5 hours.
Lecture: 24 hours.
Performance examination: 62 hours.
Practical application (individual): 198 hours.
Knowledge examination: 7 hours.
Classroom instruction includes lectures, demonstration, and
practice time for the specific tasks identified. Each classroom session
includes knowledge and performance evaluations to ensure students have
mastered all of the learning objectives for the specialty proficiency.
Training includes both simulators and actual vehicle operation.
Practical training includes on-the-road and skills operations, ground
guide procedures, and operating a vehicle with a towed load. Students
practice their driving and backing, with and without a trailer.
Instructors ride with the students as they operate on approved road
routes. Specific training areas (pads) are set aside for the students
to practice their backing skills and ground guide procedures safely.
The Marine Corps training curriculum also includes emergency
procedures and cargo loading.
Navy--EO--Equipment Operator
The core curriculum of the USN Heavy Vehicle Operator (Truck
Driver) (EO) course (53-3032.00) is designed to train Navy personnel
how to operate passenger and cargo vehicles to rated capacity. They
palletize, containerize, load and safely transport various types of
cargo and demonstrate knowledge and skills for qualifying as a driver
journeyman. The complete program covers topics including:
Hazardous materials transportation
Line haul planning
Manual tractor-truck operations
Vehicle Recovery Operations
The course is taught over 160 hours including 30 hours classroom
and 130 hours lab (behind the wheel). By completing this course, the
Navy driver will be able to:
Perform the duties of normal, non-combat conditions
driving in accordance with the local state driver licensing agency's
CDL driver handbook;
Manage hazardous petroleum, oils and lubricants (POL)
material required during line haul and worksite activities, to support
normal, non-combat operations;
Perform preventive maintenance on a non- or up-armored
manual truck tractor with drop-neck trailer, consisting of pre-start,
during-operations, and after-operations equipment checks, to support
normal, non-combat operations, in accordance with local State Driver
License Agency CDL handbooks;
Operate vehicle controls of a non- or up-armored manual
truck-tractor, to support normal, non-combat operations; and
Be proficient with the components and controls of a drop-
neck trailer relative to a detached/attached gooseneck and a coupled/
uncoupled trailer.
Other topics covered within the Navy EO training program include:
Development and maintenance of operational records
Operation of high mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicles
Weight distribution and load securement
Loading bulk and container cargo
Preventive maintenance
[[Page 26898]]
Pre- and post-trip vehicle safety inspections
The military training programs described above are thorough and
comprehensive. They incorporate most of the elements recommended by the
Professional Truck Driver Institute, which has been the principal
standard-setting organization for private-sector motor carrier training
for decades. They are also entirely compatible with the requirements of
FMCSA's recently-adopted ELDT rule. Although geared to heavy-duty
military vehicles, military training is readily transferrable to a
civilian context, since the operational characteristics of large
military and civilian vehicles are very similar and, in some cases,
identical. The Agency believes that exempting these drivers from the
CLP knowledge test, in addition to the skills test, will have no
adverse effect on highway safety.
VI. Removal of Regulatory Guidance
FMCSA's previous regulatory guidance for Sec. 383.77 was removed
when the Agency's guidance for 49 CFR parts 383 and 384 was revised and
reissued; see ``Commercial Driver's License Standards, Requirements and
Penalties; Regulatory Guidance'' (DATE XX FR XXXX).
VII. International Impacts
The FMCSRs, and any exceptions to the FMCSRs, apply only within the
United States (and, in some cases, United States territories). Motor
carriers and drivers are subject to the laws and regulations of the
countries in which they operate, unless an international agreement
states otherwise. Drivers and carriers should be aware of the
regulatory differences among nations.
VIII. Section-by-Section
Sec. 383.23 Commercial Driver's License
The reference to ``written'' tests in paragraph (a)(1) would be
changed to ``knowledge'' tests to match the terminology used elsewhere
in part 383.
Sec. 383.77 Substitute for Driving Skills Tests for Drivers With
Military CMV Experience
Section 383.77(a)(1) would be revised to state that an applicant
may not have held two civilian licenses simultaneously, in addition to
a military license.
Sec. 383.79 Skills Testing of Out-of-State Students; Knowledge Test
Waivers for Certain Military Personnel
The title of this section would be amended slightly, while
paragraph (a), CDL applicants trained out-of-State, would not be
modified.
Existing paragraph (b), Military service member applicants for a
CLP or CDL, would be removed and replaced by a new paragraph (b),
Knowledge test waivers for certain current or former military service
members applying for a CLP or CDL.
Existing paragraph (b)(1) would be redesignated as proposed
paragraph (c). A new paragraph, In general, would be added as paragraph
(b)(1).
Existing paragraph (b)(2) would be redesignated as proposed
paragraph (d). A new paragraph, Conditions and limitations, would be
added as paragraph (b)(2), outlining the requirements to apply for a
waiver of the knowledge test.
Redesignated paragraph (c) would retain the content of current
paragraph (b)(1), State of duty station, but with some editorial
changes.
New paragraph (d), Electronic transmission, is currently codified
as paragraph (b)(2).
New paragraph (e), State of domicile, would be revised to reflect
the new waiver options proposed by this NPRM.
Sec. 384.301 Substantial Compliance General Requirements
This proposed rule would not alter the existing paragraphs in this
section. Paragraph (l) is added.
IX. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O.
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) as supplemented by
E.O. 13563 and DOT policies and procedures, FMCSA must determine
whether a regulatory action is ``significant,'' and therefore subject
to OMB review and the requirements of the E.O. The Order defines
``significant regulatory action'' as one likely to result in a rule
that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal government or communities.
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Agency.
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof.
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the E.O.
FMCSA has determined that this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of E.O. 12866 or significant
within the meaning of Department of Transportation regulatory policies
and procedures. However, FMCSA did evaluate the costs and benefits of
this proposed rulemaking. This proposed rulemaking would not result in
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, lead to a
major increase in costs or prices, or have significant adverse effects
on the United States economy.
Costs and Benefits
FMCSA evaluated potential costs and benefits associated with this
proposed rulemaking. The Agency concludes that costs, if any, would be
minimal and are non-quantifiable, while benefits would be realized by
certain current and former military service members transitioning into
civilian careers driving CMVs, as well as by their potential employers.
Due to the voluntary nature of the proposed rule and potential
variations across States with respect to conditions and limitations
imposed beyond those of Sec. 383.79, the Agency is unable to quantify
these benefits.
Section 383.79(b)
The proposed rule would allow States to waive the requirement in
Sec. 383.23(a)(1) that an applicant must pass a knowledge test for a
CLP, including waiver of the knowledge test for a CLP required by Sec.
383.111, for certain current or former military service members. This
proposed rule would allow States to provide waivers of the knowledge
test, if the individual can certify and provide evidence that during
the 1-year period immediately prior to the application he or she met
the criteria outlined in Sec. 383.79.
Under the proposed rule, certain active-duty military service
members may submit an application to the SDLA in their State of duty
station for a CLP or CDL, including an application for a waiver of the
knowledge test, upon prior agreement between respective SDLAs in the
State of duty station and State of domicile. This proposed rule is
therefore expected to result in time savings to active-duty service
members equivalent to the amount of time that would otherwise be spent
preparing for and taking the knowledge test. The Agency cannot quantify
the aggregate extent of such time savings, as the proposed rule would
not require States
[[Page 26899]]
to accept applications for waivers of the knowledge test; nor can the
Agency know what conditions and limitations States may impose on
applicants beyond those of this proposed rule. However, the Agency
considers it likely that those States that elect to accept applications
for waivers of the driving skills test would also accept applications
for waivers of the knowledge test following implementation of the
proposed rule, subject to similar conditions and limitations. If the
proposed rule encourages additional active-duty military service
members to seek civilian employment as drivers following their
completion of military service, their potential employers may benefit
from an increase in the labor supply; however, the Agency is likewise
unable to quantify this benefit due to the reasons cited above.
Certain former military service members seeking to transition into
civilian employment as a driver may benefit under the proposed rule by
no longer having to possess a CLP for 14 days before either taking the
driving skills test or applying for a waiver of the driving skills
test. Provided that their State of domicile would accept applications
for waivers of both the knowledge test and the skills test, such former
military service members may apply simultaneously for both. As noted
above, the Agency considers it likely that States that elect to accept
applications for waivers of the driving skills test would also accept
applications for waivers of the knowledge test following implementation
of the proposed rule, subject to similar conditions and limitations. By
providing an expedited path to enter the labor market, the rule allows
certain former service members to benefit from faster access to jobs,
while their potential employers may benefit from faster access to those
individuals' labor hours. As with certain active-duty military service
members, certain former military service members who obtain waivers of
the knowledge test would also incur time savings equivalent to the time
that would otherwise be spent preparing for and taking the knowledge
test. Due to the voluntary nature of this proposed rule and uncertainty
regarding conditions and limitations States may impose on applicants
beyond that of Sec. 383.79, the Agency cannot estimate the aggregate
value of these benefits to certain former military service members or
their potential employers.
In considering the costs of the proposed rule, the Agency notes
that the NPRM would allow the State of duty station (for active service
members) to transmit completed applications to the State of domicile by
a direct, secure, and efficient electronic system. Completed
applications are to include any supporting documents pertinent to the
waiver(s) being sought and--if the State of domicile has not exercised
its waiver option--the results of any knowledge and skills tests
administered. This proposed rule does not require the creation of or
significant modification to existing communication methods between
SDLAs. At present, transmissions between a State of duty station and
State of domicile are already subject to identical requirements with
respect to secure electronic transmission of completed applications
under Sec. 383.79(c). The Agency expects de minimis modifications may
be needed depending on individual State variations (if any) in
documentation that would be required for applications for knowledge
test waivers. The de minimis expectation is rooted in the assumption
that States will take a pragmatic approach by requiring the same
documentation for a knowledge test waiver application as for a skills
test waiver application.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small Entities)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857), requires Federal
agencies to consider the impact of their regulatory proposals on small
entities, analyze effective alternatives that minimize small entity
impacts, and make their analyses available for public comment. The term
``small entities'' means small businesses and not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with a
population of less than 50,000.\2\ Accordingly, DOT policy requires an
analysis of the impact of all regulations on small entities, and
mandates that agencies strive to lessen any adverse effects on these
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Available
at: https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/regulatory-flexibility-act
(accessed December 14, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When an agency issues a rulemaking proposal, the RFA requires the
agency to ``prepare and make available for public comment an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis'' which will ``describe the impact of
the proposed rule on small entities'' (5 U.S.C. 603(a)). Section 605 of
the RFA allows an agency to certify, in lieu of preparing an analysis,
if the proposed rulemaking is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The primary entities affected by this proposed rule would be
certain current and former military service members and SDLAs. Under
the standards of the RFA, as amended by the SBREFA, none of these are
small entities. Therefore, FMCSA has determined that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Incidentally, the proposed rule's impacts on current
and former military service members would be entirely beneficial by
allowing States to provide more flexibility to those seeking to obtain
a CDL. With respect to costs, the impacts on SDLAs that choose to
exercise the waiver option are estimated to be de minimis.
Accordingly, I hereby certify that this proposed rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. FMCSA invites comment from
members of the public who believe there will be a significant impact on
small entities from this action.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, FMCSA wants to assist small entities
in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on themselves and participate in the rulemaking initiative.
If the proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance; please consult the FMCSA point of
contact, Selden Fritschner, listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business Administration's Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of FMCSA, call
1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). DOT has a policy regarding the rights
of small entities to regulatory enforcement fairness and an explicit
policy against retaliation for exercising these rights.
[[Page 26900]]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $156 million (which is the
equivalent of $100 million in 1995, adjusted for inflation to 2015
levels) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, the Agency does discuss the effects of the
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection Information)
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
F. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for Federalism under Section 1(a) of E.O.
13132 if it has ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.''
FMCSA has determined that this proposed rule would not have
substantial direct costs on or for the States, nor will it limit the
policymaking discretion of the States. This proposed rule does not
preempt any State law or regulation. Therefore, this proposed rule does
not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Impact Statement.
G. E.O. 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
H. E.O. 13045 (Protection of Children)
E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), requires agencies
issuing ``economically significant'' rules, if the regulation also
concerns an environmental health or safety risk that an agency has
reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, to include an
evaluation of the regulation's environmental health and safety effects
on children. The Agency determined this proposed rule is not
economically significant. Therefore, no analysis of the impacts on
children is required. In any event, this regulatory action does not in
any respect present an environmental health or safety risk that could
disproportionately affect children.
I. E.O. 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, and has determined it will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have taking implications.
J. Privacy
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, (Pub. L. 108-447, 118
Stat. 2809, 3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note) requires the Agency to conduct a
privacy impact assessment (PIA) of a regulation that will affect the
privacy of individuals. Because this proposed rule does not require the
collection of personally identifiable information (PII), the Agency is
not required to conduct a PIA.
The E-Government Act of 2002, Public Law 107-347, 208, 116 Stat.
2899, 2921 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires Federal agencies to conduct a PIA
for new or substantially changed technology that collects, maintains,
or disseminates information in an identifiable form. No new or
substantially changed technology would collect, maintain, or
disseminate information as a result of this rule. Accordingly, FMCSA
has not conducted a PIA.
K. E.O. 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this
program.
L. E.O. 13211 (Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Agency has determined that the rule is not a
``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a
``significant regulatory action'' likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under E.O. 13211.
M. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under E.O.
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
N. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Technical
Standards)
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards would be
inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) are standards that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This proposed rule
does not use technical standards. Therefore, FMCSA did not consider the
use of voluntary consensus standards.
O. Environment (NEPA, CAA, Environmental Justice)
FMCSA analyzed this NPRM for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
determined this action is categorically excluded from further analysis
and documentation in an environmental assessment or environmental
impact statement under FMCSA Order 5610.1 (69 FR 9680, March 1, 2004),
Appendix 2, paragraphs 6.s.(6) and 6.t.(2). The Categorical Exclusion
(CE) in paragraph 6.s.(6) covers a requirement for States to give
knowledge and skills tests to all qualified applicants for commercial
drivers' licenses which meet the Federal standard. The CE in paragraph
6.t.(2) covers regulations to ensure that the States comply with the
provisions of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986, by: (2)
Having the appropriate laws, regulations, programs, policies,
procedures and information systems concerning the qualification and
licensing of persons who apply for a commercial driver's license, and
persons who are issued a commercial driver's license. The requirements
in this proposed rule are covered by these CEs and the proposed action
does not have any effect on the quality of the environment. The CE
determination is available for inspection or copying in the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 26901]]
FMCSA also analyzed this proposed rule under the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA), section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), and
implementing regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection
Agency. Approval of this action is exempt from the CAA's general
conformity requirement since it does not affect direct or indirect
emissions of criteria pollutants.
Under E.O. 12898, each Federal agency must identify and address, as
appropriate, ``disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on
minority populations and low-income populations'' in the United States,
its possessions, and territories. FMCSA evaluated the environmental
justice effects of this proposed rule in accordance with the E.O., and
has determined that no environmental justice issue is associated with
this proposed rule, nor is there any collective environmental impact
that would result from its promulgation.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 383
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
49 CFR Part 384
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Highway safety, Motor carriers.
In consideration of the foregoing, FMCSA amends 49 CFR chapter III,
parts 383 and 384 to read as follows:
PART 383--COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND
PENALTIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 383 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502;
secs. 214 and 215 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767;
sec. 1012(b) of Pub. L. 107-56; 115 Stat. 272, 297, sec. 4140 of
Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1746; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112-141,
126 Stat. 405, 830; secs. 5401 and 7208 of Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat.
1312, 1546, 1593; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
2. Amend Sec. 383.23 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 383.23 Commercial driver's license.
(a) General rule.
(1) No person shall operate a commercial motor vehicle unless such
person has taken and passed knowledge and driving tests for a CLP or
CDL that meet the Federal standards contained in subparts F, G, and H
of this part for the commercial motor vehicle that person operates or
expects to operate.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 383.77 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 383.77 Substitute for driving skills tests for drivers with
military CMV experience.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) Has not simultaneously held more than one civilian license (in
addition to a military license);
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 383.79 by revising the section heading and paragraph (b)
and adding paragraphs (c) through (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 383.79 Skills testing of out-of-state students; knowledge test
waivers for certain military personnel.
* * * * *
(b) Knowledge test waivers for certain current or former military
service members applying for a CLP or CDL-- (1) In general.--For
certain current or former military service members, as defined in Sec.
383.5, who meet the conditions and limitations set forth in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, a State may waive the requirement in Sec.
383.23(a)(1) that a CDL applicant must pass a knowledge test for a CLP
or CDL, including waiver of the knowledge required by Sec. 383.111.
(2) Conditions and limitations.--A current or former military
service member applying for waiver of the knowledge test described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section must certify and provide evidence
that, during the 1-year period immediately prior to the application,
he/she:
(i) Is or was regularly employed in a military position requiring
operation of a CMV;
(ii) Is operating a vehicle representative of the CMV the driver
applicant expects to operate upon separation from the military, or
operated such a vehicle immediately preceding separation from the
military;
(iii) Has not simultaneously held more than one civilian license
(in addition to a military license);
(iv) Has not had any license suspended, revoked, or cancelled;
(v) Has not had any convictions for any type of motor vehicle for
the disqualifying offenses contained in Sec. 383.51(b);
(vi) Has not had more than one conviction for any type of motor
vehicle for serious traffic violations contained in Sec. 383.51(c);
and
(vii) Has not had any conviction for a violation of military, State
or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control (other than a
parking violation) arising in connection with any traffic accident, and
has no record of an accident in which he/she was at fault.
(c) Role of State of duty station.--A State where active duty
military service members are stationed, but not domiciled, may, upon
prior agreement with the State of domicile:
(1) Accept an application for a CLP or CDL, including an
application for waiver of the knowledge test prescribed in paragraph
(b)(1)) of this section, from such a military service member who
(i) Is regularly employed or was regularly employed within the last
year in a military position requiring operation of a CMV;
(ii) Has a valid driver's license from his or her State of
domicile;
(iii) Has a valid active duty military identification card; and
(iv) Has a current copy of either the service member's military
leave and earnings statement, or his or her orders.
(2) Either
(i) Administer the knowledge and skills tests to the military
service member, as appropriate, in accordance with subparts F, G and H
of this part, if the State of domicile requires those tests; or
(ii) Waive the knowledge and skills tests in accordance with Sec.
383.77 and this section, if the State of domicile has exercised the
option to waive those tests; and
(3) Destroy the military service member's driver's license on
behalf of the State of domicile, unless the latter requires the
driver's license to be surrendered to its own driver licensing agency.
(d) Requirement for electronic transmission.--The State of duty
station must transmit to the State of domicile by a direct, secure, and
efficient electronic system the completed application, any supporting
documents, and--if the State of domicile has not exercised its waiver
option--the results of any knowledge and skills administered.
(e) Role of State of domicile.--Upon completion of the applicant's
application pursuant to Sec. 383.71 and any testing administered by
the State of duty station pursuant to Sec. Sec. 383.71 and 383.73, the
State of domicile of the military service member applying for a CLP or
CDL may
(1) Accept the completed application, any supporting documents, and
the results of the knowledge and skills tests administered by the State
of duty station (unless waived at the discretion of the State of
domicile); and
(2) Issue the applicant a CLP or CDL.
[[Page 26902]]
PART 384--STATE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE PROGRAM
0
5. The authority citation for part 384 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502; secs. 103
and 215 of Pub. L. 106-59, 113 Stat. 1753, 1767; sec. 32934 of Pub.
L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; sec. 5401 and 5524 of Pub. L. 114-
94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1546, 1560; and 49 CFR 1.87.
0
6. Add paragraph (l) to Sec. 384.301 to read as follows:
Sec. 384.301 Substantial compliance general requirements.
* * * * *
(l) A State must come into substantial compliance with the
requirements of subpart B of this part and part 383 of this chapter in
effect as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE] as soon as practicable,
but, unless otherwise specifically provided in this part, not later
than [DATE 3 YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL RULE].
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: June 6,
2017.
Daphne Y. Jefferson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-12079 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P