Expanded Delegation Authority for Procedures Related to Representation of Claimants, 26751-26754 [2017-11977]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than 15 minutes that
will prohibit entry within 60 yards of a
point on land immediately adjacent to
navigable waters located at latitude
37°55′41″ N., longitude 075°23′09″ W.
This action is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
request any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0248 to read as
follows:
Chincoteague Channel within 60 yards
of the fireworks display located near the
shoreline at a point on land at
approximate position latitude 37°55′41″
N., longitude 075°23′09″ W. (NAD
1983).
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons are
required to comply with the general
regulations governing safety zones in
§ 165.23.
(2) With the exception of participants,
entry into or remaining in this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads
or his designated representatives. All
vessels underway within this safety
zone at the time it is implemented are
to depart the zone immediately.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads or his representative can be
contacted at telephone number (757)
668–5555. The Coast Guard and
designated security vessels enforcing
the safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio channel 13
(165.65 Mhz) and channel 16 (156.8
Mhz).
(4) This section applies to all persons
or vessels wishing to transit through the
safety zone except participants and
vessels that are engaged in the following
operations:
(i) Enforcing laws;
(ii) Servicing aids to navigation, and
(iii) Emergency response vessels.
(5) The U.S. Coast Guard may be
assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of the safety zone by Federal, State, and
local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. through
10:30 p.m. on July 1, 2017, or on July
8, 2017, if weather renders the primary
date unsuitable.
Dated: June 5, 2017.
Richard J. Wester,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Hampton Road.
[FR Doc. 2017–11989 Filed 6–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T05–0248 Safety Zone, Chincoteague
Channel; Chincoteague Islands, VA.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port means
the Commander, Sector Hampton Roads.
Representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
Participants mean individuals and
vessels involved in the fireworks
display.
(b) Locations. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:27 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 14
RIN 2900–AP96
Expanded Delegation Authority for
Procedures Related to Representation
of Claimants
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its regulations
on representation of claimants for VA
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26751
benefits to specifically permit additional
delegations of authority within the
Office of the General Counsel (OGC),
update the titles of certain individuals
and offices in OGC, and make a minor
procedural clarification. These
amendments are necessary to allow
OGC to streamline the procedures
related to representation of claimants
and to ensure correct titles of certain
individuals and offices in OGC are
reflected in the regulations. In addition,
a procedural clarification is being made
by adding a sentence that was
inadvertently omitted from a previous
final rule.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective June 9, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan Taylor, Benefits Law Group
Staff Attorney, Office of the General
Counsel (022), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–7699
(this is not a toll-free telephone
number.)
VA OGC
is streamlining its procedures related to
representation of VA claimants because
of increased and higher-than-anticipated
workload. This document amends 38
CFR part 14 to specifically permit
additional delegations of authority and
to update titles of OGC positions to
reflect the current organization of OGC.
Under 38 U.S.C. chapter 59, the VA
Secretary has authority to recognize
attorneys, agents, and Veterans Service
Organization (VSO) representatives for
the preparation, presentation, and
prosecution of benefit claims; regulate
fees charged by accredited attorneys and
agents; and prescribe the rules of
conduct applicable while providing
claims assistance. In December 2006,
Congress enacted the Veterans Benefits,
Health Care, and Information
Technology Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109–
461), which significantly amended
chapter 59. Section 101 of the Act
required VA to: (1) Regulate the
qualifications and standards of conduct
applicable to accredited attorneys and
agents; (2) annually collect information
about accredited attorneys’ and agents’
standing to practice or appear before
any court, bar, or Federal or State
agency; (3) proscribe accreditation of
individuals who have been suspended
or disbarred from any such entity
without reinstatement; (4) add to the list
of grounds for suspension or exclusion
of attorneys or agents from further
practice before VA; and (5) subject VSO
representatives and individuals
recognized for a particular claim to
suspension and exclusion from further
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
26752
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
practice before VA on the same grounds
as apply to attorneys and agents.
In addition, section 101 amended the
fee provisions in chapter 59 to allow
paid representation by accredited
attorneys and agents at an earlier stage
in the VA claims adjudication process.
These amendments authorized
accredited attorneys and agents to
charge fees for services provided after
the claimant files a notice of
disagreement in the case, rather than
after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals
(Board) first makes a final decision in
the case. The amendments also
authorized VA to: (1) Restrict the
amount of fees attorneys and agents may
charge; (2) subject fee agreements
between attorneys or agents and
claimants to review by the Secretary,
such review to be appealable to the
Board; and (3) collect an assessment
from any attorney or agent to whom VA
pays fees directly from past-due
benefits. Further, the amendments
eliminated fee matters as grounds for
criminal penalties under 38 U.S.C. 5905.
On May 22, 2008, VA published a
final rule in the Federal Register (73 FR
29852) to implement the chapter 59
amendments. The final rule addressed
accreditation of individuals, standards
of conduct for all individuals authorized
to assist claimants before VA, and
attorneys’ and agents’ fees. Since the
2008 amendments, OGC has continued
to develop and fine-tune the
accreditation process. OGC’s experience
in administering the accreditation
program over the past nine years has
highlighted the need to streamline these
procedures pertaining to the
representation of VA claimants.
The workload of the VA’s
accreditation program is at an all-time
high. The number of VA-accredited
individuals has increased rapidly since
the publication of the final rule on May
22, 2008. Prior to the June 23, 2008,
effective date of the final rule, licensed
attorneys did not need to apply for
accreditation. Since then, VA has
accredited 17,500 attorneys, an average
of more than 2,000 per year. The
number of VA-accredited claims agents
has also increased, from 64 to
approximately 400. OGC reviews
thousands of accreditation applications
and cancellation requests each year.
Additionally, OGC must review
complaints about the conduct of
accredited individuals and disputes
about the reasonableness of fees and
expenses. Complaints and fee disputes
have also increased rapidly since 2008;
currently 121 complaints and 193 fee
disputes are pending with OGC.
Under 38 U.S.C. 5904, Congress
granted the VA Secretary the authority
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:27 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
to accredit agents and attorneys for
practice before VA. Congress has also
authorized the Secretary to delegate
authority to act and to render decisions
under the laws administered by VA as
necessary (38 U.S.C. 512). The
Secretary, then the Administrator of
Veterans Affairs, first delegated this
authority for the accreditation program
to the General Counsel in 1954 in a new
38 CFR part 14 (19 FR 5556). This
revised rule permits the General
Counsel and the Deputy General
Counsel for Legal Policy, as well as the
Chief Counsels and Deputy Chief
Counsels of the specific OGC law groups
or districts, to designate others as
additional individuals who are
authorized to make necessary
determinations on accreditation matters.
Additionally, with regard to
proceedings to review fee agreements
under § 14.636(i) and expenses under
§ 14.637(d), the revised rule transfers
from the Chief Counsel level to the
Deputy Chief Counsel level the
authority in OGC to (1) initiate a review;
(2) extend the time for an agent,
attorney, claimant, or appellant to
respond; and (3) make a
recommendation to the General
Counsel. These changes will increase
the timeliness of the decisions and the
overall efficiency of VA’s accreditation
program.
In most instances, the revised rule
allows the General Counsel to delegate
authority to the Deputy General Counsel
for Legal Policy, a Chief Counsel to
delegate authority to the Deputy Chief
Counsel or another appropriate
designee, and a Deputy Chief Counsel to
delegate authority to another
appropriate designee. More broad
delegation authority is provided for in
the following cases of the General
Counsel’s authority:
1. Under § 14.629(b)(5) to grant or
reinstate accreditation for an individual
who remains suspended in a
jurisdiction on grounds solely derivative
of suspension or disbarment in another
jurisdiction to which he or she has been
subsequently reinstated,
2. Under § 14.636(i)(3) to make the
final decision in proceedings to review
fee agreements, and
3. Under § 14.637(d)(3) to make the
final decision in proceedings to review
expenses.
This broader delegation authority
extends to the Deputy General Counsel
for Legal Policy if he or she has already
been designated by the General Counsel
to perform these functions.
Additional revisions are being made
to reflect the recent reorganization of
OGC. The former titles of ‘‘Assistant
General Counsel’’ and ‘‘Regional
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Counsel’’ have both been changed to
‘‘Chief Counsel’’, the previously
numbered staff groups have been given
titles based on subject matter (e.g.,
Benefits Law Group), and the former 23
Regional Counsel Offices have been
changed to 10 District Chief Counsel
Offices, two for each of VA’s 5 districts.
Finally, a new sentence providing
that, after an attorney or agent has had
an opportunity to respond in
proceedings to review expenses and a
claimant or appellant has had an
opportunity to reply to that response,
the Deputy Chief Counsel will forward
the record and a recommendation to the
General Counsel (or, as discussed above,
a designee of either the General Counsel
or the Deputy General Counsel for Legal
Policy) for a final decision, is being
added to § 14.637(d)(3). A similar
sentence was inadvertently omitted
from the May 22, 2008 final rule,
although the procedure was described
in the preamble to the proposed rule (72
FR 25930, 25934), and can be inferred
from the regulatory text of the proposed
and final rule (72 FR at 25943; 73 FR at
29879). This procedure parallels that
described in 38 CFR 14.636(i)(3)
regarding review of fee agreements.
Administrative Procedure Act
These changes to 38 CFR part 14 are
being published without regard to
notice-and-comment procedures of 5
U.S.C. 553(b) because they involve only
matters of agency organization,
procedure, and practice, which are
exempted from such notice-andcomment procedures by virtue of 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A). This final rule consists
of only nonsubstantive changes that
affect internal procedures. For this
reason, in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), VA has determined that there
is good cause to waive the 30-day
delayed effective date requirement
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory action’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. VA’s
impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s Web site at https://
www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published
From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to
Date.’’
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory
flexibility analyses requirements of
sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, are
not applicable to this rule, because a
notice of proposed rulemaking is not
required for this rule. Even so, the VA
Secretary hereby certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. This rule affects only internal VA
OGC procedures. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:27 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers and Titles
There are no Federal Domestic
Assistance programs associated with
this final rule.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on June 5,
2017, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 14
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Courts, Foreign
relations, Government employees,
Lawyers, Legal services, Organization
and functions (Government agencies),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Surety bonds, Trusts and
trustees, Veterans.
Dated: June 5, 2017.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation
Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 14 as
follows:
PART 14—LEGAL SERVICES,
GENERAL COUNSEL, AND
MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS
1. The authority citation for part 14
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 2671–
2680; 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 512, 515, 5502, 5901–
5905; 28 CFR part 14, appendix to part 14,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 14.627 by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (l)
through (r) as paragraphs (o) through
(u).
■ b. Redesignating paragraph (k) as
paragraph (m).
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (g)
through (j) as paragraphs (h) through (k).
■ d. Adding new paragraphs (g), (l), and
(n) to read as follows:
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 14.627
26753
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Chief Counsel includes a designee
of the Chief Counsel.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Deputy Chief Counsel includes a
designee of the Deputy Chief Counsel.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) General Counsel includes the
Deputy General Counsel for Legal Policy
if designated by the General Counsel.
When so designated, references to ‘‘the
General Counsel or his or her designee’’
may further include a designee of the
Deputy General Counsel for Legal
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 14.629 by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text.
■ b. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii), removing the
words ‘‘a Regional Counsel with
jurisdiction for the State’’ and adding, in
its place, the words ‘‘the appropriate
District Chief Counsel’’.
■ c. In paragraph (b)(1)(i), adding the
words ‘‘Office of the’’ before the words
‘‘General Counsel’’.
■ d. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), adding the
words ‘‘Office of the’’ before all
references to ‘‘General Counsel’’.
■ e. In paragraph (b)(2)(ix), removing
the words ‘‘a VA Regional Counsel’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘the
appropriate District Chief Counsel’’.
■ f. In paragraph (b)(5) adding the words
‘‘or his or her designee’’ after the word
‘‘Counsel’’.
■ g. In paragraph (c)(1), adding the
words ‘‘Office of the’’ before the words
‘‘General Counsel’’.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 14.629 Requirements for accreditation of
service organization representatives;
agents; and attorneys.
The Chief Counsel with subject-matter
jurisdiction will conduct an inquiry and
make an initial determination regarding
any question relating to the
qualifications of a prospective service
organization representative, agent, or
attorney. If the Chief Counsel
determines that the prospective service
organization representative, agent, or
attorney meets the requirements for
accreditation in paragraphs (a) or (b) of
this section, notification of accreditation
will be issued by the Chief Counsel and
will constitute authority to prepare,
present, and prosecute claims before an
agency of original jurisdiction or the
Board of Veterans’ Appeals. If the Chief
Counsel determines that the prospective
representative, agent, or attorney does
not meet the requirements for
accreditation, notification will be issued
by the Chief Counsel concerning the
reasons for disapproval, an opportunity
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
26754
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
to submit additional information, and
any restrictions on further application
for accreditation. If an applicant submits
additional evidence, the Chief Counsel
will consider such evidence and
provide further notice concerning his or
her final decision. The determination of
the Chief Counsel regarding the
qualifications of a prospective service
organization representative, agent, or
attorney may be appealed by the
applicant to the General Counsel.
Appeals must be in writing and filed
with the Office of the General Counsel
(022D), 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, not later than 30
days from the date on which the Chief
Counsel’s decision was mailed. In
deciding the appeal, the General
Counsel’s decision shall be limited to
the evidence of record before the Chief
Counsel. A decision of the General
Counsel is a final agency action for
purposes of review under the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
701–706.
*
*
*
*
*
■
§ 14.631
■
[Amended]
4. In § 14.631(d) remove the words
‘‘Regional Counsel of jurisdiction’’ and
add, in their place, the words
‘‘appropriate District Chief Counsel’’.
■
§ 14.633
[Amended]
5. Amend § 14.633 by:
a. In paragraph (e), removing all
references to ‘‘Assistant General’’ and
adding, in each place, the word ‘‘Chief’’.
■ b. In paragraph (e) introductory text,
removing the words ‘‘of jurisdiction’’
and adding in their place, the words
‘‘with subject-matter jurisdiction’’.
■ c. In paragraph (f), removing all
references to ‘‘Assistant General’’ and
adding, in each place, the word ‘‘Chief’’.
■ d. In paragraph (f), removing the
words ‘‘or his or her designee’’ and
adding in their place, the words ‘‘with
subject-matter jurisdiction’’.
■ 6. Amend § 14.636 by:
■ a. In paragraph (i)(2), removing the
words ‘‘Assistant General Counsel’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘Deputy Chief Counsel with subjectmatter jurisdiction’’.
■ b. Revising paragraph (i)(3) to read as
follows:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
■
§ 14.636 Payment of fees for
representation by agents and attorneys in
proceedings before Agencies of Original
Jurisdiction and before the Board of
Veterans’ Appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(3) The Office of the General Counsel
shall close the record in proceedings to
review fee agreements 15 days after the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:27 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
date on which the agent or attorney
served a response on the claimant or
appellant, or 30 days after the claimant,
appellant, or the Office of the General
Counsel served the motion on the agent
or attorney if there is no response. The
Deputy Chief Counsel with subjectmatter jurisdiction may, for a reasonable
period upon a showing of sufficient
cause, extend the time for an agent or
attorney to serve an answer or for a
claimant or appellant to serve a reply.
The Deputy Chief Counsel shall forward
the record and a recommendation to the
General Counsel or his or her designee
for a final decision. Unless either party
files a Notice of Disagreement with the
Office of the General Counsel, the
attorney or agent must refund any
excess payment to the claimant or
appellant not later than the expiration of
the time within which the Office of the
General Counsel’s decision may be
appealed to the Board of Veterans’
Appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Amend § 14.637 by:
a. In paragraph (d)(2) removing the
words ‘‘Assistant General Counsel’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘Deputy Chief Counsel with subjectmatter jurisdiction’’.
■ b. Revising paragraph (d)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 14.637 Payment of the expenses of
agents and attorneys in proceedings before
Agencies of Original Jurisdiction and
before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) The Office of the General Counsel
shall close the record in proceedings to
review expenses 15 days after the date
on which the agent or attorney served a
response on the claimant or appellant,
or 30 days after the claimant, appellant,
or the Office of the General Counsel
served the motion on the agent or
attorney if there is no response. The
Deputy Chief Counsel with subjectmatter jurisdiction may, for a reasonable
period upon a showing of sufficient
cause, extend the time for an agent or
attorney to serve an answer or for a
claimant or appellant to serve a reply.
The Deputy Chief Counsel shall forward
the record and a recommendation to the
General Counsel or his or her designee
for a final decision. Unless either party
files a Notice of Disagreement with the
Office of the General Counsel, the
attorney or agent must refund any
excess payment to the claimant or
appellant not later than the expiration of
the time within which the Office of the
General Counsel’s decision may be
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
appealed to the Board of Veterans’
Appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–11977 Filed 6–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0497; FRL–9962–47–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas Control
of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles
With Mobile Source Incentive
Programs
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is approving revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Texas that pertain to
regulations to control air pollution from
motor vehicles with mobile source
incentive programs.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 7, 2017 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives relevant
adverse comment by July 10, 2017. If the
EPA receives such comment, the EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2014–0497, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
pitre.randy@epa.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Mr. Randy Pitre, (214) 665–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 110 (Friday, June 9, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26751-26754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11977]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 14
RIN 2900-AP96
Expanded Delegation Authority for Procedures Related to
Representation of Claimants
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its
regulations on representation of claimants for VA benefits to
specifically permit additional delegations of authority within the
Office of the General Counsel (OGC), update the titles of certain
individuals and offices in OGC, and make a minor procedural
clarification. These amendments are necessary to allow OGC to
streamline the procedures related to representation of claimants and to
ensure correct titles of certain individuals and offices in OGC are
reflected in the regulations. In addition, a procedural clarification
is being made by adding a sentence that was inadvertently omitted from
a previous final rule.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective June 9, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Taylor, Benefits Law Group
Staff Attorney, Office of the General Counsel (022), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202)
461-7699 (this is not a toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA OGC is streamlining its procedures
related to representation of VA claimants because of increased and
higher-than-anticipated workload. This document amends 38 CFR part 14
to specifically permit additional delegations of authority and to
update titles of OGC positions to reflect the current organization of
OGC.
Under 38 U.S.C. chapter 59, the VA Secretary has authority to
recognize attorneys, agents, and Veterans Service Organization (VSO)
representatives for the preparation, presentation, and prosecution of
benefit claims; regulate fees charged by accredited attorneys and
agents; and prescribe the rules of conduct applicable while providing
claims assistance. In December 2006, Congress enacted the Veterans
Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 (Pub. L.
109-461), which significantly amended chapter 59. Section 101 of the
Act required VA to: (1) Regulate the qualifications and standards of
conduct applicable to accredited attorneys and agents; (2) annually
collect information about accredited attorneys' and agents' standing to
practice or appear before any court, bar, or Federal or State agency;
(3) proscribe accreditation of individuals who have been suspended or
disbarred from any such entity without reinstatement; (4) add to the
list of grounds for suspension or exclusion of attorneys or agents from
further practice before VA; and (5) subject VSO representatives and
individuals recognized for a particular claim to suspension and
exclusion from further
[[Page 26752]]
practice before VA on the same grounds as apply to attorneys and
agents.
In addition, section 101 amended the fee provisions in chapter 59
to allow paid representation by accredited attorneys and agents at an
earlier stage in the VA claims adjudication process. These amendments
authorized accredited attorneys and agents to charge fees for services
provided after the claimant files a notice of disagreement in the case,
rather than after the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) first makes a
final decision in the case. The amendments also authorized VA to: (1)
Restrict the amount of fees attorneys and agents may charge; (2)
subject fee agreements between attorneys or agents and claimants to
review by the Secretary, such review to be appealable to the Board; and
(3) collect an assessment from any attorney or agent to whom VA pays
fees directly from past-due benefits. Further, the amendments
eliminated fee matters as grounds for criminal penalties under 38
U.S.C. 5905.
On May 22, 2008, VA published a final rule in the Federal Register
(73 FR 29852) to implement the chapter 59 amendments. The final rule
addressed accreditation of individuals, standards of conduct for all
individuals authorized to assist claimants before VA, and attorneys'
and agents' fees. Since the 2008 amendments, OGC has continued to
develop and fine-tune the accreditation process. OGC's experience in
administering the accreditation program over the past nine years has
highlighted the need to streamline these procedures pertaining to the
representation of VA claimants.
The workload of the VA's accreditation program is at an all-time
high. The number of VA-accredited individuals has increased rapidly
since the publication of the final rule on May 22, 2008. Prior to the
June 23, 2008, effective date of the final rule, licensed attorneys did
not need to apply for accreditation. Since then, VA has accredited
17,500 attorneys, an average of more than 2,000 per year. The number of
VA-accredited claims agents has also increased, from 64 to
approximately 400. OGC reviews thousands of accreditation applications
and cancellation requests each year. Additionally, OGC must review
complaints about the conduct of accredited individuals and disputes
about the reasonableness of fees and expenses. Complaints and fee
disputes have also increased rapidly since 2008; currently 121
complaints and 193 fee disputes are pending with OGC.
Under 38 U.S.C. 5904, Congress granted the VA Secretary the
authority to accredit agents and attorneys for practice before VA.
Congress has also authorized the Secretary to delegate authority to act
and to render decisions under the laws administered by VA as necessary
(38 U.S.C. 512). The Secretary, then the Administrator of Veterans
Affairs, first delegated this authority for the accreditation program
to the General Counsel in 1954 in a new 38 CFR part 14 (19 FR 5556).
This revised rule permits the General Counsel and the Deputy General
Counsel for Legal Policy, as well as the Chief Counsels and Deputy
Chief Counsels of the specific OGC law groups or districts, to
designate others as additional individuals who are authorized to make
necessary determinations on accreditation matters. Additionally, with
regard to proceedings to review fee agreements under Sec. 14.636(i)
and expenses under Sec. 14.637(d), the revised rule transfers from the
Chief Counsel level to the Deputy Chief Counsel level the authority in
OGC to (1) initiate a review; (2) extend the time for an agent,
attorney, claimant, or appellant to respond; and (3) make a
recommendation to the General Counsel. These changes will increase the
timeliness of the decisions and the overall efficiency of VA's
accreditation program.
In most instances, the revised rule allows the General Counsel to
delegate authority to the Deputy General Counsel for Legal Policy, a
Chief Counsel to delegate authority to the Deputy Chief Counsel or
another appropriate designee, and a Deputy Chief Counsel to delegate
authority to another appropriate designee. More broad delegation
authority is provided for in the following cases of the General
Counsel's authority:
1. Under Sec. 14.629(b)(5) to grant or reinstate accreditation for
an individual who remains suspended in a jurisdiction on grounds solely
derivative of suspension or disbarment in another jurisdiction to which
he or she has been subsequently reinstated,
2. Under Sec. 14.636(i)(3) to make the final decision in
proceedings to review fee agreements, and
3. Under Sec. 14.637(d)(3) to make the final decision in
proceedings to review expenses.
This broader delegation authority extends to the Deputy General
Counsel for Legal Policy if he or she has already been designated by
the General Counsel to perform these functions.
Additional revisions are being made to reflect the recent
reorganization of OGC. The former titles of ``Assistant General
Counsel'' and ``Regional Counsel'' have both been changed to ``Chief
Counsel'', the previously numbered staff groups have been given titles
based on subject matter (e.g., Benefits Law Group), and the former 23
Regional Counsel Offices have been changed to 10 District Chief Counsel
Offices, two for each of VA's 5 districts.
Finally, a new sentence providing that, after an attorney or agent
has had an opportunity to respond in proceedings to review expenses and
a claimant or appellant has had an opportunity to reply to that
response, the Deputy Chief Counsel will forward the record and a
recommendation to the General Counsel (or, as discussed above, a
designee of either the General Counsel or the Deputy General Counsel
for Legal Policy) for a final decision, is being added to Sec.
14.637(d)(3). A similar sentence was inadvertently omitted from the May
22, 2008 final rule, although the procedure was described in the
preamble to the proposed rule (72 FR 25930, 25934), and can be inferred
from the regulatory text of the proposed and final rule (72 FR at
25943; 73 FR at 29879). This procedure parallels that described in 38
CFR 14.636(i)(3) regarding review of fee agreements.
Administrative Procedure Act
These changes to 38 CFR part 14 are being published without regard
to notice-and-comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) because they
involve only matters of agency organization, procedure, and practice,
which are exempted from such notice-and-comment procedures by virtue of
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). This final rule consists of only nonsubstantive
changes that affect internal procedures. For this reason, in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), VA has determined that there is good cause to
waive the 30-day delayed effective date requirement under 5 U.S.C.
553(d).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant
[[Page 26753]]
regulatory action'' requiring review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined and
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document
at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web site at
https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses requirements
of sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612, are not applicable to this rule, because a notice of proposed
rulemaking is not required for this rule. Even so, the VA Secretary
hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This rule affects only
internal VA OGC procedures. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this rulemaking is exempt from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This rule would have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles
There are no Federal Domestic Assistance programs associated with
this final rule.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S.
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on June 5, 2017, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 14
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Courts, Foreign
relations, Government employees, Lawyers, Legal services, Organization
and functions (Government agencies), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Surety bonds, Trusts and trustees, Veterans.
Dated: June 5, 2017.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation Policy & Management,
Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 14
as follows:
PART 14--LEGAL SERVICES, GENERAL COUNSEL, AND MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 14 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 2671-2680; 38 U.S.C. 501(a),
512, 515, 5502, 5901-5905; 28 CFR part 14, appendix to part 14,
unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 14.627 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (l) through (r) as paragraphs (o) through
(u).
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (k) as paragraph (m).
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (g) through (j) as paragraphs (h) through
(k).
0
d. Adding new paragraphs (g), (l), and (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 14.627 Definitions.
* * * * *
(g) Chief Counsel includes a designee of the Chief Counsel.
* * * * *
(l) Deputy Chief Counsel includes a designee of the Deputy Chief
Counsel.
* * * * *
(n) General Counsel includes the Deputy General Counsel for Legal
Policy if designated by the General Counsel. When so designated,
references to ``the General Counsel or his or her designee'' may
further include a designee of the Deputy General Counsel for Legal
Policy.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 14.629 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii), removing the words ``a Regional Counsel
with jurisdiction for the State'' and adding, in its place, the words
``the appropriate District Chief Counsel''.
0
c. In paragraph (b)(1)(i), adding the words ``Office of the'' before
the words ``General Counsel''.
0
d. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), adding the words ``Office of the'' before
all references to ``General Counsel''.
0
e. In paragraph (b)(2)(ix), removing the words ``a VA Regional
Counsel'' and adding, in their place, the words ``the appropriate
District Chief Counsel''.
0
f. In paragraph (b)(5) adding the words ``or his or her designee''
after the word ``Counsel''.
0
g. In paragraph (c)(1), adding the words ``Office of the'' before the
words ``General Counsel''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 14.629 Requirements for accreditation of service organization
representatives; agents; and attorneys.
The Chief Counsel with subject-matter jurisdiction will conduct an
inquiry and make an initial determination regarding any question
relating to the qualifications of a prospective service organization
representative, agent, or attorney. If the Chief Counsel determines
that the prospective service organization representative, agent, or
attorney meets the requirements for accreditation in paragraphs (a) or
(b) of this section, notification of accreditation will be issued by
the Chief Counsel and will constitute authority to prepare, present,
and prosecute claims before an agency of original jurisdiction or the
Board of Veterans' Appeals. If the Chief Counsel determines that the
prospective representative, agent, or attorney does not meet the
requirements for accreditation, notification will be issued by the
Chief Counsel concerning the reasons for disapproval, an opportunity
[[Page 26754]]
to submit additional information, and any restrictions on further
application for accreditation. If an applicant submits additional
evidence, the Chief Counsel will consider such evidence and provide
further notice concerning his or her final decision. The determination
of the Chief Counsel regarding the qualifications of a prospective
service organization representative, agent, or attorney may be appealed
by the applicant to the General Counsel. Appeals must be in writing and
filed with the Office of the General Counsel (022D), 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20420, not later than 30 days from the date on
which the Chief Counsel's decision was mailed. In deciding the appeal,
the General Counsel's decision shall be limited to the evidence of
record before the Chief Counsel. A decision of the General Counsel is a
final agency action for purposes of review under the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701-706.
* * * * *
Sec. 14.631 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 14.631(d) remove the words ``Regional Counsel of
jurisdiction'' and add, in their place, the words ``appropriate
District Chief Counsel''.
Sec. 14.633 [Amended]
0
5. Amend Sec. 14.633 by:
0
a. In paragraph (e), removing all references to ``Assistant General''
and adding, in each place, the word ``Chief''.
0
b. In paragraph (e) introductory text, removing the words ``of
jurisdiction'' and adding in their place, the words ``with subject-
matter jurisdiction''.
0
c. In paragraph (f), removing all references to ``Assistant General''
and adding, in each place, the word ``Chief''.
0
d. In paragraph (f), removing the words ``or his or her designee'' and
adding in their place, the words ``with subject-matter jurisdiction''.
0
6. Amend Sec. 14.636 by:
0
a. In paragraph (i)(2), removing the words ``Assistant General
Counsel'' and adding, in their place, the words ``Deputy Chief Counsel
with subject-matter jurisdiction''.
0
b. Revising paragraph (i)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 14.636 Payment of fees for representation by agents and
attorneys in proceedings before Agencies of Original Jurisdiction and
before the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(3) The Office of the General Counsel shall close the record in
proceedings to review fee agreements 15 days after the date on which
the agent or attorney served a response on the claimant or appellant,
or 30 days after the claimant, appellant, or the Office of the General
Counsel served the motion on the agent or attorney if there is no
response. The Deputy Chief Counsel with subject-matter jurisdiction
may, for a reasonable period upon a showing of sufficient cause, extend
the time for an agent or attorney to serve an answer or for a claimant
or appellant to serve a reply. The Deputy Chief Counsel shall forward
the record and a recommendation to the General Counsel or his or her
designee for a final decision. Unless either party files a Notice of
Disagreement with the Office of the General Counsel, the attorney or
agent must refund any excess payment to the claimant or appellant not
later than the expiration of the time within which the Office of the
General Counsel's decision may be appealed to the Board of Veterans'
Appeals.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 14.637 by:
0
a. In paragraph (d)(2) removing the words ``Assistant General Counsel''
and adding, in their place, the words ``Deputy Chief Counsel with
subject-matter jurisdiction''.
0
b. Revising paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 14.637 Payment of the expenses of agents and attorneys in
proceedings before Agencies of Original Jurisdiction and before the
Board of Veterans' Appeals.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) The Office of the General Counsel shall close the record in
proceedings to review expenses 15 days after the date on which the
agent or attorney served a response on the claimant or appellant, or 30
days after the claimant, appellant, or the Office of the General
Counsel served the motion on the agent or attorney if there is no
response. The Deputy Chief Counsel with subject-matter jurisdiction
may, for a reasonable period upon a showing of sufficient cause, extend
the time for an agent or attorney to serve an answer or for a claimant
or appellant to serve a reply. The Deputy Chief Counsel shall forward
the record and a recommendation to the General Counsel or his or her
designee for a final decision. Unless either party files a Notice of
Disagreement with the Office of the General Counsel, the attorney or
agent must refund any excess payment to the claimant or appellant not
later than the expiration of the time within which the Office of the
General Counsel's decision may be appealed to the Board of Veterans'
Appeals.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-11977 Filed 6-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P