Safety Zone; Canal Fest Water Ski Show; Erie Canal System, Fish Creek, Sylvan Beach, NY, 26760-26762 [2017-11951]
Download as PDF
26760
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(2) For Airbus Model A300 F4–605R and
F4–622R airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–31–6124, Revision 01, dated July 4,
2016.
(3) For Airbus Model A310–203, –204,
–221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and –325
airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin A310–31–
2123, Revision 01, dated July 1, 2016.
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
(1) As of the effective date of this AD, for
any airplane that has ECAM SGU standard
W32, part number 9612670332, installed, no
person may install an ECAM SGU standard
prior to W32.
(2) For any airplane that has an ECAM SGU
standard prior to W32, after modification of
that airplane, no person may install an ECAM
SGU standard prior to W32.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using the service information
specified in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of
this AD, as applicable.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–31–6113,
Revision 02, dated September 4, 2014.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–31–6124,
dated October 13, 2005.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–31–2123,
dated January 4, 2006.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2016–0195, dated September 30, 2016, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–0515.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61
93 44 51; email: account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet: https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 18,
2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–11000 Filed 6–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0385]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Canal Fest Water Ski
Show; Erie Canal System, Fish Creek,
Sylvan Beach, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Erie Canal System,
Fish Creek, Sylvan Beach, NY. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on these navigable waters
during the Canal Fest Water Ski Show
on August 13, 2017. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from passing through the safety
zone during the water ski show unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or a designated representative.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0385 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LT Michael
Collet, Chief of Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo;
telephone 716–843–9322, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 09, 2017, the Sylvan Verona
Beach Resort Association notified the
Coast Guard that it will be conducting
a water ski show from 12:30 p.m. to 2:30
p.m. on August 13, 2017. The water ski
show to take place in the waters of Fish
Creek on the Erie Canal System
contained within the following
positions: Starting at position
43°11′37.79″ N. and 075°43′53.27″ W.,
running Northeast to position
43°11′43.15″ N. and 075°43′44.88″ W.,
then Southeast to 43°11′42.82″ N. and
075°43′43.42″ W. then Southwest to
43°11′36.90″ N. and 075°43′52.06″ W.
then returning to the point of origin.
The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP)
has determined that a water ski show on
a navigable waterway will pose a
significant risk to participants and the
boating public.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within the
demonstration area of the scheduled
event. Vessel traffic will be allowed to
pass through the safety zone between
demonstrations. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 12:15 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Proposed Rules
on August 13, 2017 that would be
effective and enforced intermittently.
The safety zone will encompass all
waters of Fish Creek; Sylvan Beach, NY
contained within the following
positions: Starting at position
43°11′37.79″ N. and 075°43′53.27″ W.,
running Northeast to position
43°11′43.15″ N. and 075°43′44.88″ W.,
then Southeast to 43°11′42.82″ N. and
075°43′43.42″ W. then Southwest to
43°11′36.90″ N. and 075°43′52.06″ W.
then returning to the point of origin.
The duration of the zone is intended to
ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and
after the scheduled 12:30 p.m. to 2:30
p.m. water skiing event. Vessels will be
permitted to pass through the safety
zone intermittently during the event as
allowed by the COTP or the on-scene
representative. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we
are proposing appears at the end of this
document.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
Executive Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’), directs agencies to reduce
regulation and control regulatory costs
and provides that ‘‘for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior
regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations
be prudently managed and controlled
through a budgeting process.’’
This NPRM has not been designated
a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
As this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action, this rule is
exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017 titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit through this safety zone in
between water skiing acts which would
impact a small designated area of Fish
Creek for 2.5 hours. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone, and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26761
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
26762
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 110 / Friday, June 9, 2017 / Proposed Rules
involves the establishment of a safety
zone for 2.5 hours during intermittent
periods. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under section 2.B.2, and Figure
2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction.
Paragraph 34(g) pertains to the
establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration (REC) supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under the ADDRESSES
section of this preamble. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:30 Jun 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 5, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017–11951 Filed 6–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0385 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0385 Safety Zone; Canal Fest
Water Ski Show, Erie Canal System, Fish
Creek, Sylvan Beach, NY.
(a) Location. This zone will
encompass all waters of Fish Creek;
Sylvan Beach, NY contained within the
following positions: Starting at position
43°11′37.79″ N. and 075°43′53.27″ W.,
running Northeast to position
43°11′43.15″ N. and 075°43′44.88″ W.,
then Southeast to 43°11′42.82″ N. and
075°43′43.42″ W., then Southwest to
43°11′36.90″ N. and 075°43′52.06″ W.,
then returning to the point of origin.
(b) Enforcement Period. This
regulation will be enforced
intermittently on August 13, 2017 from
12:15 p.m. until 2:45 p.m.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R6–OAR–2014–0497; FRL–9962–33–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas Control
of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles
With Mobile Source Incentive
Programs
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing to approve revisions to the
Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Texas that
pertain to regulations to control air
pollution from motor vehicles with
mobile incentive programs.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before July 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2014–0497, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
pitre.randy@epa.gov. For additional
information on how to submit
comments see the detailed instructions
in the ADDRESSES section of the direct
final rule located in the rules section of
this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Randy Pitre, (214) 665–7299,
pitre.randy@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, the EPA is approving the
State’s SIP submittal as a direct rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 110 (Friday, June 9, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26760-26762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11951]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0385]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Canal Fest Water Ski Show; Erie Canal System, Fish
Creek, Sylvan Beach, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain waters of the Erie Canal System, Fish Creek, Sylvan Beach,
NY. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters during the Canal Fest Water Ski Show on August 13,
2017. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from
passing through the safety zone during the water ski show unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0385 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9322, email SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On April 09, 2017, the Sylvan Verona Beach Resort Association
notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a water ski show
from 12:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. on August 13, 2017. The water ski show to
take place in the waters of Fish Creek on the Erie Canal System
contained within the following positions: Starting at position
43[deg]11'37.79'' N. and 075[deg]43'53.27'' W., running Northeast to
position 43[deg]11'43.15'' N. and 075[deg]43'44.88'' W., then Southeast
to 43[deg]11'42.82'' N. and 075[deg]43'43.42'' W. then Southwest to
43[deg]11'36.90'' N. and 075[deg]43'52.06'' W. then returning to the
point of origin. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined
that a water ski show on a navigable waterway will pose a significant
risk to participants and the boating public.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within the demonstration area of the scheduled
event. Vessel traffic will be allowed to pass through the safety zone
between demonstrations. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 12:15 p.m. to
2:30 p.m.
[[Page 26761]]
on August 13, 2017 that would be effective and enforced intermittently.
The safety zone will encompass all waters of Fish Creek; Sylvan Beach,
NY contained within the following positions: Starting at position
43[deg]11'37.79'' N. and 075[deg]43'53.27'' W., running Northeast to
position 43[deg]11'43.15'' N. and 075[deg]43'44.88'' W., then Southeast
to 43[deg]11'42.82'' N. and 075[deg]43'43.42'' W. then Southwest to
43[deg]11'36.90'' N. and 075[deg]43'52.06'' W. then returning to the
point of origin. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after
the scheduled 12:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. water skiing event. Vessels will
be permitted to pass through the safety zone intermittently during the
event as allowed by the COTP or the on-scene representative. No vessel
or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to reduce regulation and control
regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and
controlled through a budgeting process.''
This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
As this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, this
rule is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See
OMB's Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of
the Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit through this safety zone in between
water skiing acts which would impact a small designated area of Fish
Creek for 2.5 hours. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
[[Page 26762]]
involves the establishment of a safety zone for 2.5 hours during
intermittent periods. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under section 2.B.2, and Figure 2-1, paragraph
34(g) of the Instruction. Paragraph 34(g) pertains to the establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or
safety zones. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration (REC)
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0385 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0385 Safety Zone; Canal Fest Water Ski Show, Erie Canal
System, Fish Creek, Sylvan Beach, NY.
(a) Location. This zone will encompass all waters of Fish Creek;
Sylvan Beach, NY contained within the following positions: Starting at
position 43[deg]11'37.79'' N. and 075[deg]43'53.27'' W., running
Northeast to position 43[deg]11'43.15'' N. and 075[deg]43'44.88'' W.,
then Southeast to 43[deg]11'42.82'' N. and 075[deg]43'43.42'' W., then
Southwest to 43[deg]11'36.90'' N. and 075[deg]43'52.06'' W., then
returning to the point of origin.
(b) Enforcement Period. This regulation will be enforced
intermittently on August 13, 2017 from 12:15 p.m. until 2:45 p.m.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 5, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017-11951 Filed 6-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P