Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 26048-26049 [2017-11670]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
26048
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or in the
less-than-fair value investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be the allothers rate of 45.42 percent, which is
the all-others rate established in the
investigation.26 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Toyo Kohan will be
that established in the final results of
this administrative review (except, if the
rate is zero or de minimis, no cash
deposit will be required); (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
dumping margin is zero or de minimis
in the final results of review, we will
instruct CBP not to assess duties on any
of its entries in accordance with the
Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,
‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin
of dumping for the exporter is
determined to be zero or de minimis, no
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 22
The final results of this review shall be
the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Toyo
Kohan for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.23 In addition, if the
Department determines that NSSMC
had no shipments of subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under NSSMC’s case
number will be liquidated at the allother’s rate.24 The all-others rate is
45.42 percent.25 We intend to issue
liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days
after publication of the final results of
this review.
Dated: May 30, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
22 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
23 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
24 Id.
25 See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products from Japan: Antidumping
Duty Order, 79 FR 30816, 30817 (May 29, 2014)
(Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments
V. Comparisons to Normal Value
VI. Product Comparisons
VII. Discussion of Methodology
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
C. Date of Sale
D. Export Price
E. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability
2. Level of Trade
3. Sales to Affiliated Customers
4. Cost of Production Analysis
5. Cost of Production Test
6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
7. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparisons
8. Constructed Value
F. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–11672 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
26 See
PO 00000
Order, 79 FR at 30817.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–929]
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
From the People’s Republic of China:
Notice of Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 10, 2017, The
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC). Based
on the timely withdrawal of the requests
for review of certain companies, we are
now rescinding this administrative
review for the period February 1, 2016
through January 31, 2017 with respect to
191 companies.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis McClure or John Anwesen, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5973 or
(202) 482–0131, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 8, 2017, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
PRC for the period of review (POR)
February 1, 2016, through January 31,
2017.1
On February 28, 2017, SGL Carbon
LLC and Superior Graphite Co. (the
petitioners) requested an administrative
review of the order for 194 producers
and/or exporters of the subject
merchandise.2 On April 10, 2017, in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated
an administrative review of the order on
small diameter graphite electrodes from
the People’s Republic of China with
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 9709
(February 8, 2017).
2 See the petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People’s
Republic of China—Request for Initiation of
Antidumping Administrative Review,’’ dated
February 28, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
respect to 194 companies.3 On April 21,
2017, the petitioners withdrew their
request for an administrative review for
191 out of 194 companies.4 See the
Initiation Notice for the full list of
companies for which the Department
initiated a review. No other party
requested an administrative review of
this order.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested the
review withdraws its request within 90
days of the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. In
this case, the petitioners timely
withdrew their review request, in part,
by the 90-day deadline, and no other
party requested an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order.
Therefore, we are rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
PRC for the period February 1, 2016,
through January 31, 2017, with respect
to the 191 for which all review requests
were withdrawn. The review will
continue with respect to the remaining
three companies: (1) Fangda Group; 5 (2)
Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co.,
Ltd.; and (3) Xuzhou Jianglong Carbon
Products Co., Ltd.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies
for which this review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
4 See the petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People’s
Republic of China—Petitioners’ Withdrawal of
Certain Requests for Review and Respondent
Selection Comments,’’ dated April 20, 2017.
5 The Fangda Group consists of Beijing Fangda
Carbon Tech Co., Ltd., Chengdu Rongguang Carbon
Co., Ltd., Fangda Carbon New Material Co., Ltd.,
Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd., and Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We intend to issue and publish this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–11670 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–813]
Certain Preserved Mushrooms From
India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms (mushrooms)
from India for the period of February 1,
2016 through January 31, 2017.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Johnson or Denisa Ursu,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; Telephone: (202) 482–4929
or (202) 482–2285, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26049
Background
On February 8, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms from India for the
period of February 1, 2016 through
January 31, 2017.1
On February 28 2017, in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(b), the Department received a
timely request from Himalya
International Limited and Himalya
International Inc. (collectively, Himalya)
to conduct an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
mushrooms from India manufactured
and exported by Himalya International
Limited.2
On April 10, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order.3
This administrative review covers
Himalya during the period February 1,
2016 through January 31, 2017. On May
16, 2017, Himalya timely withdrew its
request for an administrative review.4
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review. Himalya withdrew its
review request before the 90-day
deadline, and no other party requested
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order. Therefore, in
response to the timely withdrawal of the
review request, the Department is
rescinding in its entirety the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on mushrooms
from India for the review period
February 1, 2016 through January 31,
2017.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 9709
(February 8, 2017).
2 See Himalya’s letter, ‘‘Preserved Mushrooms
from India—Request for Administrative Review of
Himalya International Inc & Himalya International
Limited,’’ dated February 28, 2017.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
17188 (April 10, 2017).
4 See Himalya’s letter, ‘‘Certain Preserved
Mushrooms from India: Withdraw of Admin
Review Request Made on February 28th, 2017’’
dated May 16, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26048-26049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11670]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-929]
Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 10, 2017, The Department of Commerce (the Department)
published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes from the
People's Republic of China (PRC). Based on the timely withdrawal of the
requests for review of certain companies, we are now rescinding this
administrative review for the period February 1, 2016 through January
31, 2017 with respect to 191 companies.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure or John Anwesen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5973 or (202)
482-0131, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 8, 2017, the Department published a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on small diameter graphite electrodes from the PRC for the period
of review (POR) February 1, 2016, through January 31, 2017.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 82 FR 9709 (February 8, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 28, 2017, SGL Carbon LLC and Superior Graphite Co. (the
petitioners) requested an administrative review of the order for 194
producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise.\2\ On April 10,
2017, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an
administrative review of the order on small diameter graphite
electrodes from the People's Republic of China with
[[Page 26049]]
respect to 194 companies.\3\ On April 21, 2017, the petitioners
withdrew their request for an administrative review for 191 out of 194
companies.\4\ See the Initiation Notice for the full list of companies
for which the Department initiated a review. No other party requested
an administrative review of this order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See the petitioners' submission, ``Small Diameter Graphite
Electrodes from the People's Republic of China--Request for
Initiation of Antidumping Administrative Review,'' dated February
28, 2017.
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation
Notice).
\4\ See the petitioners' submission, ``Small Diameter Graphite
Electrodes from the People's Republic of China--Petitioners'
Withdrawal of Certain Requests for Review and Respondent Selection
Comments,'' dated April 20, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the publication of
the notice of initiation of the requested review. In this case, the
petitioners timely withdrew their review request, in part, by the 90-
day deadline, and no other party requested an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order. Therefore, we are rescinding the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter
graphite electrodes from the PRC for the period February 1, 2016,
through January 31, 2017, with respect to the 191 for which all review
requests were withdrawn. The review will continue with respect to the
remaining three companies: (1) Fangda Group; \5\ (2) Fushun Jinly
Petrochemical Carbon Co., Ltd.; and (3) Xuzhou Jianglong Carbon
Products Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Fangda Group consists of Beijing Fangda Carbon Tech Co.,
Ltd., Chengdu Rongguang Carbon Co., Ltd., Fangda Carbon New Material
Co., Ltd., Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd., and Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For the
companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall
be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15
days after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We intend to issue and publish this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-11670 Filed 6-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
