Regulatory Reform Initiative, 25221-25223 [2017-11321]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the ADEQ rule listed in Table 1 of this
preamble. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the EPA
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 16, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2017–10946 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 515, 520, 525, 530, 531,
532, 535, 540 and 565
[Docket No. 17–04]
RIN 3072–AC69
Regulatory Reform Initiative
Federal Maritime Commission.
Notice of inquiry.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Maritime
Commission (FMC or Commission) is
issuing this Inquiry to solicit
information and comments in an effort
to identify existing FMC regulations that
are outdated, unnecessary, ineffective,
eliminate jobs or inhibit job creation,
impose costs that exceed benefits, or
otherwise interfere with regulatory
reform initiatives and policies. This
action is taken in conjunction with
Executive Order 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda.’’
DATES: Comments are due July 5, 2017.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25221
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Email: secretary@fmc.gov. Include
in the subject line: ‘‘Docket No. 17–04,
Regulatory Reform Initiative.’’
Comments should be attached to the
email as a Microsoft Word or textsearchable PDF document. Only nonconfidential comments and public
versions of confidential comments
should be submitted by email.
Comments containing confidential
information should not be submitted by
email.
• Mail: Rachel E. Dickon, Assistant
Secretary, Federal Maritime
Commission, 800 North Capitol Street
NW., Ste. 1046, Washington, DC 20573–
0001.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents and
comments received, go to the
Commission’s Electronic Reading Room
at: https://www.fmc.gov/17-04.
Confidential Information: If your
comments contain confidential
information, you must submit the
following:
• A transmittal letter requesting
confidential treatment that identifies the
specific information in the comments
for which protection is sought and
demonstrates that the information is a
trade secret or other confidential
research, development, or commercial
information.
• A confidential copy of your
comments, consisting of the complete
filing with a cover page marked
‘‘Confidential-Restricted,’’ and the
confidential material clearly marked on
each page. You should submit the
confidential copy to the Commission by
mail.
• A public version of your comments
with the confidential information
excluded. The public version must state
‘‘Public Version—confidential materials
excluded’’ on the cover page and on
each affected page, and must clearly
indicate any information withheld. You
may submit the public version to the
Commission by email or mail.
The Commission will provide
confidential treatment for the identified
confidential information to the extent
allowed by law.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions regarding submitting
comments or the treatment of
confidential information, contact Rachel
E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary, Federal
Maritime Commission, 800 North
Capitol Street NW., Ste. 1046,
Washington, DC 20573–0001. Phone:
(202) 523–5725. Email: secretary@
fmc.gov. For all other questions, contact
Karen V. Gregory, Managing Director,
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
25222
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Federal Maritime Commission, 800
North Capitol Street NW., Room 1018,
Washington, DC 20573–0001. Phone:
(202) 523–5800. Email: omd@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 24, 2017, President Trump
issued Executive Order 13777,
Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda (E.O. or E.O. 13777). 82 FR
12285 (March 1, 2017). This E.O.
follows closely upon the President’s
previous E.O. concerning government
regulations, E.O. 13771, Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs. 82 FR 9339 (February 3, 2017).
Among other issues, E.O. 13777 directs
the head of most Federal agencies to
designate an agency official as its
Regulatory Reform Officer (RRO), who
will ‘‘oversee the implementation of
regulatory reform initiatives and
policies to ensure that agencies
effectively carry out regulatory
reforms.’’ Independent regulatory
agencies such as the Commission are
not subject to E.O. 13777, however they
are encouraged to comply. OMB
Memorandum M–17–23, Guidance on
Regulatory Reform Accountability under
Executive Order 13777, titled
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,’’ issued April 28, 2017. On
March 13, 2017, Acting Chairman
Michael A. Khouri designated the
agency’s Managing Director, Karen V.
Gregory, to serve as Regulatory Reform
Officer.
E.O. 13777 directs Federal agencies
subject to the E.O. to establish a
Regulatory Reform Task Force (Task
Force), consisting of the Agency RRO
and other designated agency officials,
which will evaluate existing regulations
and make recommendations to the
agency head concerning their repeal,
replacement, or modification. The
FMC’s Task Force is charged with
evaluating existing regulations to ‘‘make
recommendations to the agency head
regarding their repeal, replacement, or
modification.’’ Further, the E.O. directs
each Task Force to attempt to identify
regulations that:
• Eliminate jobs, or inhibit job
creation;
• are outdated, unnecessary, or
ineffective;
• impose costs that exceed benefits;
or
• create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with regulatory
reform initiatives and policies.
Within 90 days of the E.O., the Task
Force is directed to provide a report to
the agency head detailing the agency’s
progress towards the goals of
implementing regulatory reform and
identifying regulations for repeal,
replacement, or modification.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
The designation of a Regulatory
Reform Officer and establishment of a
Regulatory Reform Task Force is
consistent with the intent of E.O. 13777
and E.O. 13771, the deregulatory spirit
of the Shipping Act as amended by the
Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998,
and agency regulatory review initiatives
ongoing since November 4, 2011.
Building on Executive Orders of both
the prior and current Administrations,
the Commission is in the process of
identifying those regulations that are the
most ineffective, would be the easiest to
repeal, and would lend themselves to a
definitive timeline within the agency to
move those items to a vote before the
Commission.
Commission Action
The Commission invites comment
and information from all members of the
interested public, including ocean
common carriers, marine terminal
operators, ocean transportation
intermediaries (OTIs), tariff publishers,
surety companies, exporters, importers,
and beneficial cargo owners, on ways to
make the Commission’s regulations less
burdensome and more effective in
achieving the objectives of the Shipping
Act. The Commission specifically
requests comments and current
information or data on any (or all) of the
following areas of FMC programs and
regulations:
46 CFR Part 515 Licensing, Financial
Responsibility Requirements and
General Duties for Ocean
Transportation Intermediaries
Under this program, the Commission
reviews all applications for OTI NonVessel Operating Common Carrier
(NVOCC) and OTI Ocean Freight
Forwarder licenses and, after
investigation, may issue a license to
qualified applicants. After approval,
OTI licenses are issued to applicants
upon receipt of acceptable proof of
financial responsibility, usually in the
form of a surety bond. When
appropriate, the Office recommends
denial.
The Commission also manages the
Regulated Persons Index as to parties
licensed or registered with the
Commission, receives and processes all
OTI bonds and bond riders, registers
foreign-based unlicensed NVOCCs, and
provides for renewal of OTI licenses and
registrations every three years.
Interested parties may wish to review
the record and Final Rule in FMC
Docket No. 13–05, Amendments to
Regulations Governing Ocean
Transportation Intermediary Licensing
and Financial Responsibility
Requirements, and General Duties,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(Final Rule published at 80 FR 68721
(Nov. 5, 2015), as corrected at 81 FR
4592 (Jan. 27, 2016); rulemaking record
available at www.fmc.gov/13-05/).
46 CFR Part 520 Carrier Automated
Tariffs
Under this program, the Commission
reviews carrier-published tariff systems
under the accessibility and accuracy
standards of the Shipping Act of 1984,
reviews published tariff material for
compliance with the Shipping Act’s
requirements, and responds to inquiries
or issues that arise concerning tariff
rates, rules and practices. The
Commission also acts upon applications
for special permission to deviate from
tariff publishing rules and regulations
and recommends Commission action on
specific problems and concerns
regarding the publication of tariffs.
The Commission publishes the
location of all VOCC and NVOCC tariffs
online.
46 CFR Part 525 Marine Terminal
Operator Schedules
The Commission’s program under 46
CFR part 525 provides that a Marine
Terminal Operator (MTO) may make
available a schedule of its rates,
regulations, and practices to the public
at its discretion. A complete and current
set of schedules of rates, regulations,
and practices must be maintained for
five years, and made available to the
Commission upon request.
MTOs who currently publish a
schedule are identified through Form
FMC–1 and the RPI. The Commission
separately publishes the location of
those terminal schedules available to
the public.
46 CFR Part 530 Service Contracts
The Shipping Act allows ocean
common carriers, either individually or
through agreements, to negotiate and
execute service contracts with one or
more shippers or shippers’ associations.
Under service contracts, shippers make
a commitment to provide a certain
volume or portion of cargo over a fixed
period of time and carriers commit to a
specified rate and a defined service
level. These contracts are filed
confidentially with the Commission,
and are maintained in the Commission’s
SERVCON system. A concise statement
of certain contract essential terms, i.e.,
commodity or commodities involved,
minimum volume or portion, duration,
and origin and destination port ranges,
is required to be published in the
carrier’s tariffs.
The Commission monitors service
contract filings for acts prohibited by
the Shipping Act of 1984. Original
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
signed service contracts, amendments,
and associated records must be
maintained for five years from the
termination of the contract and be made
available to the Commission for audit
upon request. An FMC-developed Web
Service allows VOCCs to incorporate the
filing of service contracts into their own
contract management systems.
Interested parties may wish to review
the record and Final Rule in FMC
Docket No. 16–05, Amendments to
Regulations Governing Service
Contracts and NVOCC Service
Arrangements (Final Rule published at
82 FR 16288 (Apr. 4, 2017); rulemaking
record available at https://www.fmc.gov/
16-05/).
46 CFR Part 531
Arrangements
NVOCC Service
NVOCCs that are in compliance with
the Commission’s licensing and
financial responsibility requirements
(46 CFR part 515) may enter into an
NVOCC Service Arrangement (NSA)
with one or more NSA Shippers. An
NSA is the NVOCC functional
equivalent to a service contract. NSAs
are filed confidentially with the
Commission, and maintained in the
FMC’s SERVCON system.
Interested parties may wish to review
the record and Final Rule in FMC
Docket No. 16–05, Amendments to
Regulations Governing Service
Contracts and NVOCC Service
Arrangements (Final Rule published at
82 FR 16288 (Apr. 4, 2017); rulemaking
record available at https://www.fmc.gov/
16-05/).
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
46 CFR Part 532 NVOCC Negotiated
Rate Arrangements
NVOCCs may enter into an NVOCC
Negotiated Rate Arrangement (NRA),
which are exempt from certain tariff rate
publication requirements. NRAs are
written arrangements between a shipper
and a licensed or registered NVOCC to
provide specific transportation service
for a stated cargo quantity, from origin
to destination, on and after a stated date
or within a defined time frame. If an
NVOCC uses NRAs, it need not publish
that rate in the tariff it makes available
to the public. Unlike service contracts
and NSAs, NRAs are not filed with the
Commission, but are maintained in
private electronic systems.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
46 CFR Part 535 Ocean Common
Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator
Agreements Subject to the Shipping Act
of 1984
The Commission reviews agreements
involving ocean common carriers and
marine terminal operators under the
standards of the Shipping Act of 1984.
More specifically, the Commission has
responsibility for competition review
and market analysis, focusing on
activity that is substantially
anticompetitive under the standards of
section 6(g) of the Shipping Act of 1984.
In this regard, the Commission
administers a variety of monitoring
programs and other research efforts,
designed to track relevant competitive
and economic activity in major U.S.
trade lanes and apprise the Commission
of emerging commercial trends and
carrier pricing and service activities.
The Commission’s agreement program
activities consist of processing carrier
and marine terminal operator agreement
filings; making appropriate
recommendations on the disposition of
filed agreements, administering
Monitoring Report filing requirements,
and reviewing agreement meeting
minutes and reports; and maintaining
an agreement database that contains
pertinent information on each ocean
common carrier and marine terminal
operator agreement filed with the
Commission.
A rulemaking proceeding is currently
pending as to agreement filing
requirements and processing. See FMC
Docket No. 16–04, Ocean Common
Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator
Agreements Subject to the Shipping Act
of 1984, (Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking published at 81 FR 53986
(Aug. 15, 2016); rulemaking record
available at www.fmc.gov/16-04/).
Parties are encouraged to review that
rulemaking proceeding before filing
comments to this Notice of Inquiry.
46 CFR Part 540 Passenger Vessel
Financial Responsibility
Under this program, the Commission
issues certificates to operators of
passenger vessels (PVOs) with berths for
50 or more passengers and that embark
passengers from U.S. ports. The
Certificate (Performance) evidences that
the PVO has on file with the
Commission acceptable coverage to
satisfy any liability incurred for
nonperformance of transportation, such
as when a PVO declares bankruptcy and
fails to complete the cruises booked.
The coverage is used to reimburse
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
25223
passengers when the PVO fails to
perform cruises as contracted and has
taken no further actions to refund
passengers. The Certificate (Casualty)
evidences that the PVO has acceptable
coverage on file with the Commission to
satisfy any liability incurred for death or
injury during a cruise.
For additional information, please see
the record and Final Rule in FMC
Docket No. 11–16, Passenger Vessel
Operator Financial Responsibility
Requirements for Nonperformance of
Transportation, (Final Rule published at
78 FR 13268 (Feb. 27, 2013); rulemaking
record available at www.fmc.gov/
11-16/).
46 CFR Part 565
Controlled Carriers
The Commission maintains a program
of reviewing the reasonableness of the
rates of carriers operating in the U.S.foreign trades that are owned or
controlled by foreign governments.
Special regulatory oversight is exercised
by the Commission to ensure that
controlled carriers, whose marketplace
decision-making can be influenced by
foreign governmental priorities or by
their access to non-market sources of
capital, do not engage in unreasonable
below-market pricing practices which
could disrupt trade or harm privatelyowned shipping companies.
The Commission periodically
publishes an updated list of controlled
carriers. [Please see https://www.fmc.gov/
about/controlled_carrier_list.aspx]
With respect to any Part of the
Commission’s regulations set forth
above, any individual regulation
thereunder, or any section or subsection
of such regulations, interested parties
are asked to submit written comments
that: (1) Identify the particular FMC
regulation or program believed
burdensome or ineffective; (2) provide
details as to how the FMC program
imposes unnecessary costs or burdens
upon your business; and (3) indicate the
manner by which the program or
particular requirement should best be
repealed, replaced, or modified. The
FMC requests that comments be as
specific as possible and include any
supporting data or other helpful
information in order to assist the
Commission with its review.
By the Commission.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–11321 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 104 (Thursday, June 1, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25221-25223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11321]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 515, 520, 525, 530, 531, 532, 535, 540 and 565
[Docket No. 17-04]
RIN 3072-AC69
Regulatory Reform Initiative
AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC or Commission) is issuing
this Inquiry to solicit information and comments in an effort to
identify existing FMC regulations that are outdated, unnecessary,
ineffective, eliminate jobs or inhibit job creation, impose costs that
exceed benefits, or otherwise interfere with regulatory reform
initiatives and policies. This action is taken in conjunction with
Executive Order 13777, ``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda.''
DATES: Comments are due July 5, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Email: secretary@fmc.gov. Include in the subject line:
``Docket No. 17-04, Regulatory Reform Initiative.'' Comments should be
attached to the email as a Microsoft Word or text-searchable PDF
document. Only non-confidential comments and public versions of
confidential comments should be submitted by email. Comments containing
confidential information should not be submitted by email.
Mail: Rachel E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary, Federal
Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Ste. 1046,
Washington, DC 20573-0001.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents and
comments received, go to the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at:
https://www.fmc.gov/17-04.
Confidential Information: If your comments contain confidential
information, you must submit the following:
A transmittal letter requesting confidential treatment
that identifies the specific information in the comments for which
protection is sought and demonstrates that the information is a trade
secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial
information.
A confidential copy of your comments, consisting of the
complete filing with a cover page marked ``Confidential-Restricted,''
and the confidential material clearly marked on each page. You should
submit the confidential copy to the Commission by mail.
A public version of your comments with the confidential
information excluded. The public version must state ``Public Version--
confidential materials excluded'' on the cover page and on each
affected page, and must clearly indicate any information withheld. You
may submit the public version to the Commission by email or mail.
The Commission will provide confidential treatment for the identified
confidential information to the extent allowed by law.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions regarding submitting
comments or the treatment of confidential information, contact Rachel
E. Dickon, Assistant Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North
Capitol Street NW., Ste. 1046, Washington, DC 20573-0001. Phone: (202)
523-5725. Email: secretary@fmc.gov. For all other questions, contact
Karen V. Gregory, Managing Director,
[[Page 25222]]
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Room 1018,
Washington, DC 20573-0001. Phone: (202) 523-5800. Email: omd@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 24, 2017, President Trump issued
Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda (E.O. or
E.O. 13777). 82 FR 12285 (March 1, 2017). This E.O. follows closely
upon the President's previous E.O. concerning government regulations,
E.O. 13771, Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs. 82
FR 9339 (February 3, 2017). Among other issues, E.O. 13777 directs the
head of most Federal agencies to designate an agency official as its
Regulatory Reform Officer (RRO), who will ``oversee the implementation
of regulatory reform initiatives and policies to ensure that agencies
effectively carry out regulatory reforms.'' Independent regulatory
agencies such as the Commission are not subject to E.O. 13777, however
they are encouraged to comply. OMB Memorandum M-17-23, Guidance on
Regulatory Reform Accountability under Executive Order 13777, titled
``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,'' issued April 28, 2017. On
March 13, 2017, Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri designated the
agency's Managing Director, Karen V. Gregory, to serve as Regulatory
Reform Officer.
E.O. 13777 directs Federal agencies subject to the E.O. to
establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force (Task Force), consisting of
the Agency RRO and other designated agency officials, which will
evaluate existing regulations and make recommendations to the agency
head concerning their repeal, replacement, or modification. The FMC's
Task Force is charged with evaluating existing regulations to ``make
recommendations to the agency head regarding their repeal, replacement,
or modification.'' Further, the E.O. directs each Task Force to attempt
to identify regulations that:
Eliminate jobs, or inhibit job creation;
are outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective;
impose costs that exceed benefits; or
create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with
regulatory reform initiatives and policies.
Within 90 days of the E.O., the Task Force is directed to provide a
report to the agency head detailing the agency's progress towards the
goals of implementing regulatory reform and identifying regulations for
repeal, replacement, or modification.
The designation of a Regulatory Reform Officer and establishment of
a Regulatory Reform Task Force is consistent with the intent of E.O.
13777 and E.O. 13771, the deregulatory spirit of the Shipping Act as
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, and agency regulatory
review initiatives ongoing since November 4, 2011. Building on
Executive Orders of both the prior and current Administrations, the
Commission is in the process of identifying those regulations that are
the most ineffective, would be the easiest to repeal, and would lend
themselves to a definitive timeline within the agency to move those
items to a vote before the Commission.
Commission Action
The Commission invites comment and information from all members of
the interested public, including ocean common carriers, marine terminal
operators, ocean transportation intermediaries (OTIs), tariff
publishers, surety companies, exporters, importers, and beneficial
cargo owners, on ways to make the Commission's regulations less
burdensome and more effective in achieving the objectives of the
Shipping Act. The Commission specifically requests comments and current
information or data on any (or all) of the following areas of FMC
programs and regulations:
46 CFR Part 515 Licensing, Financial Responsibility Requirements and
General Duties for Ocean Transportation Intermediaries
Under this program, the Commission reviews all applications for OTI
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC) and OTI Ocean Freight
Forwarder licenses and, after investigation, may issue a license to
qualified applicants. After approval, OTI licenses are issued to
applicants upon receipt of acceptable proof of financial
responsibility, usually in the form of a surety bond. When appropriate,
the Office recommends denial.
The Commission also manages the Regulated Persons Index as to
parties licensed or registered with the Commission, receives and
processes all OTI bonds and bond riders, registers foreign-based
unlicensed NVOCCs, and provides for renewal of OTI licenses and
registrations every three years.
Interested parties may wish to review the record and Final Rule in
FMC Docket No. 13-05, Amendments to Regulations Governing Ocean
Transportation Intermediary Licensing and Financial Responsibility
Requirements, and General Duties, (Final Rule published at 80 FR 68721
(Nov. 5, 2015), as corrected at 81 FR 4592 (Jan. 27, 2016); rulemaking
record available at www.fmc.gov/13-05/).
46 CFR Part 520 Carrier Automated Tariffs
Under this program, the Commission reviews carrier-published tariff
systems under the accessibility and accuracy standards of the Shipping
Act of 1984, reviews published tariff material for compliance with the
Shipping Act's requirements, and responds to inquiries or issues that
arise concerning tariff rates, rules and practices. The Commission also
acts upon applications for special permission to deviate from tariff
publishing rules and regulations and recommends Commission action on
specific problems and concerns regarding the publication of tariffs.
The Commission publishes the location of all VOCC and NVOCC tariffs
online.
46 CFR Part 525 Marine Terminal Operator Schedules
The Commission's program under 46 CFR part 525 provides that a
Marine Terminal Operator (MTO) may make available a schedule of its
rates, regulations, and practices to the public at its discretion. A
complete and current set of schedules of rates, regulations, and
practices must be maintained for five years, and made available to the
Commission upon request.
MTOs who currently publish a schedule are identified through Form
FMC-1 and the RPI. The Commission separately publishes the location of
those terminal schedules available to the public.
46 CFR Part 530 Service Contracts
The Shipping Act allows ocean common carriers, either individually
or through agreements, to negotiate and execute service contracts with
one or more shippers or shippers' associations. Under service
contracts, shippers make a commitment to provide a certain volume or
portion of cargo over a fixed period of time and carriers commit to a
specified rate and a defined service level. These contracts are filed
confidentially with the Commission, and are maintained in the
Commission's SERVCON system. A concise statement of certain contract
essential terms, i.e., commodity or commodities involved, minimum
volume or portion, duration, and origin and destination port ranges, is
required to be published in the carrier's tariffs.
The Commission monitors service contract filings for acts
prohibited by the Shipping Act of 1984. Original
[[Page 25223]]
signed service contracts, amendments, and associated records must be
maintained for five years from the termination of the contract and be
made available to the Commission for audit upon request. An FMC-
developed Web Service allows VOCCs to incorporate the filing of service
contracts into their own contract management systems.
Interested parties may wish to review the record and Final Rule in
FMC Docket No. 16-05, Amendments to Regulations Governing Service
Contracts and NVOCC Service Arrangements (Final Rule published at 82 FR
16288 (Apr. 4, 2017); rulemaking record available at https://www.fmc.gov/16-05/).
46 CFR Part 531 NVOCC Service Arrangements
NVOCCs that are in compliance with the Commission's licensing and
financial responsibility requirements (46 CFR part 515) may enter into
an NVOCC Service Arrangement (NSA) with one or more NSA Shippers. An
NSA is the NVOCC functional equivalent to a service contract. NSAs are
filed confidentially with the Commission, and maintained in the FMC's
SERVCON system.
Interested parties may wish to review the record and Final Rule in
FMC Docket No. 16-05, Amendments to Regulations Governing Service
Contracts and NVOCC Service Arrangements (Final Rule published at 82 FR
16288 (Apr. 4, 2017); rulemaking record available at https://www.fmc.gov/16-05/).
46 CFR Part 532 NVOCC Negotiated Rate Arrangements
NVOCCs may enter into an NVOCC Negotiated Rate Arrangement (NRA),
which are exempt from certain tariff rate publication requirements.
NRAs are written arrangements between a shipper and a licensed or
registered NVOCC to provide specific transportation service for a
stated cargo quantity, from origin to destination, on and after a
stated date or within a defined time frame. If an NVOCC uses NRAs, it
need not publish that rate in the tariff it makes available to the
public. Unlike service contracts and NSAs, NRAs are not filed with the
Commission, but are maintained in private electronic systems.
46 CFR Part 535 Ocean Common Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator
Agreements Subject to the Shipping Act of 1984
The Commission reviews agreements involving ocean common carriers
and marine terminal operators under the standards of the Shipping Act
of 1984. More specifically, the Commission has responsibility for
competition review and market analysis, focusing on activity that is
substantially anticompetitive under the standards of section 6(g) of
the Shipping Act of 1984. In this regard, the Commission administers a
variety of monitoring programs and other research efforts, designed to
track relevant competitive and economic activity in major U.S. trade
lanes and apprise the Commission of emerging commercial trends and
carrier pricing and service activities.
The Commission's agreement program activities consist of processing
carrier and marine terminal operator agreement filings; making
appropriate recommendations on the disposition of filed agreements,
administering Monitoring Report filing requirements, and reviewing
agreement meeting minutes and reports; and maintaining an agreement
database that contains pertinent information on each ocean common
carrier and marine terminal operator agreement filed with the
Commission.
A rulemaking proceeding is currently pending as to agreement filing
requirements and processing. See FMC Docket No. 16-04, Ocean Common
Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator Agreements Subject to the Shipping
Act of 1984, (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published at 81 FR 53986
(Aug. 15, 2016); rulemaking record available at www.fmc.gov/16-04/).
Parties are encouraged to review that rulemaking proceeding before
filing comments to this Notice of Inquiry.
46 CFR Part 540 Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility
Under this program, the Commission issues certificates to operators
of passenger vessels (PVOs) with berths for 50 or more passengers and
that embark passengers from U.S. ports. The Certificate (Performance)
evidences that the PVO has on file with the Commission acceptable
coverage to satisfy any liability incurred for nonperformance of
transportation, such as when a PVO declares bankruptcy and fails to
complete the cruises booked. The coverage is used to reimburse
passengers when the PVO fails to perform cruises as contracted and has
taken no further actions to refund passengers. The Certificate
(Casualty) evidences that the PVO has acceptable coverage on file with
the Commission to satisfy any liability incurred for death or injury
during a cruise.
For additional information, please see the record and Final Rule in
FMC Docket No. 11-16, Passenger Vessel Operator Financial
Responsibility Requirements for Nonperformance of Transportation,
(Final Rule published at 78 FR 13268 (Feb. 27, 2013); rulemaking record
available at www.fmc.gov/11-16/).
46 CFR Part 565 Controlled Carriers
The Commission maintains a program of reviewing the reasonableness
of the rates of carriers operating in the U.S.-foreign trades that are
owned or controlled by foreign governments. Special regulatory
oversight is exercised by the Commission to ensure that controlled
carriers, whose marketplace decision-making can be influenced by
foreign governmental priorities or by their access to non-market
sources of capital, do not engage in unreasonable below-market pricing
practices which could disrupt trade or harm privately-owned shipping
companies.
The Commission periodically publishes an updated list of controlled
carriers. [Please see https://www.fmc.gov/about/controlled_carrier_list.aspx]
With respect to any Part of the Commission's regulations set forth
above, any individual regulation thereunder, or any section or
subsection of such regulations, interested parties are asked to submit
written comments that: (1) Identify the particular FMC regulation or
program believed burdensome or ineffective; (2) provide details as to
how the FMC program imposes unnecessary costs or burdens upon your
business; and (3) indicate the manner by which the program or
particular requirement should best be repealed, replaced, or modified.
The FMC requests that comments be as specific as possible and include
any supporting data or other helpful information in order to assist the
Commission with its review.
By the Commission.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-11321 Filed 5-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P