Agency Information Collection Activities, Comments Request: Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve Elderly Access, 24664-24667 [2017-11028]
Download as PDF
24664
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices
Dated: May 18, 2017.
Jessica Shahin,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–11029 Filed 5–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities, Comments Request:
Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve
Elderly Access
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on the
proposed collection of information for
the Evaluation of Alternatives to
Improve Elderly Access. This is a NEW
information collection. This study will
provide FNS with a better
understanding of the barriers to serving
elderly populations in the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
and the extent to which available policy
options improve program access,
whether certain program models or
combinations are more effective than
others, and what tradeoffs exist between
program simplification/access goals and
ensuring benefit adequacy.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to
Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy
Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food
and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park
Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria,
VA 22302. Comments may also be
submitted via fax to the attention of
Kameron Burt at 703–305–2576 or via
email to kameron.burt@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project, or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans contact
Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy
Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food
and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 May 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria,
VA 22302; Fax: 703–305–2576; Email:
kameron.burt@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were
used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Evaluation of Alternatives to
Improve Elderly Access.
Form Number: [If applicable, insert
number].
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The Food and Nutrition
Service (FNS), under authorization of
SEC. 17. [7 U.S.C. 2026] of the FOOD
AND NUTRITION ACT OF 2008, as
amended, intends to conduct the
Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve
Elderly Access. FNS is interested in
exploring whether policy options
designed to improve access to the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) for the elderly are
effective. The objective of the study is
to better understand how to maximize
elder (60+) access to SNAP. The
evaluation will have four key
components:
(1) Exploratory Study: To ground the
study plan and subsequent components
of the study, the project began with an
initial exploratory research phase to
determine what is known about elder
SNAP participation levels and caseload
dynamics over time, factors influencing
elder participation in SNAP, and the
scope, range, and effects of State
interventions for elders to date. The
exploratory study drew primarily on
existing data, including SNAP Quality
Control (QC) data from Fiscal Years
2010 to 2015 and an index of State
policy options, and a literature review,
supplemented by discussions with FNS
Regional and National office staff and
experts from advocacy groups.
(2) Study of State Interventions: The
Study of State Interventions will
document the design, implementation,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and operation of interventions intended
to increase access to SNAP among the
elderly population in the selected
States. This component will provide a
comprehensive understanding of the
interventions, helping us to interpret the
effects or lack thereof observed in the
Study of Intervention Effects, draw
lessons on how aspects of the
interventions may be improved, and
assess whether the interventions, if
implemented in other locations or
contexts, might yield similar outcomes.
The primary source of data for this
study component will be the extensive
information collected during three-day
site visits to each of the ten selected
States.
(3) Study of elder participant
perspectives: The purpose of the study
is to gather direct input from elders
about their awareness of SNAP,
perceptions of the program, and
experiences applying for and receiving
SNAP benefits. Key data collection
activities for this component will
include: Phone screenings with elderly
individuals to confirm eligibility and
schedule interviews (560 individuals
will be screened to result in 280
scheduled interviews); semi-structured
interviews with 200 elderly eligible
individuals (out of the 280 scheduled
interviews) grouped into three
categories (SNAP participants, nonparticipating applicants, and nonparticipants). FNS plans to contact or
recruit another 115 individuals 60+ to
participate in the focus group. Out of
the 115 contacted, 80 will go on to
participate in the actual focus group.
These focus groups will be used to
validate and explore key themes that
emerge in the interviews. Overall, the
expectation is that out of the total 675
elderly individuals contacted, 395 will
not respond or choose not to take part
in the study.
(4) Study of State Intervention Effects:
The objective of the Study of State
Intervention Effects is to assess the
relative association between State
interventions and key program
outcomes, including elderly SNAP
application trends and caseloads, and
rates of churning. The focus of this
analysis will be on the interventions
that are specifically targeted to elderly
households (in addition to the
Community Partner Interview
Demonstration (CPID)). The study team
identified the following interventions as
being of particular interest to the study
because they either aim at increasing the
enrollment of elderly participants or
hold particular promise in this regard:
Elderly Simplified Application Project
(ESAP); Standard Medical Deduction
(SMD); CPID; Combined Application
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Project (CAP); participating in a 36Month Certification Demonstration; and
having a 36-month certification or
recertification interview waiver.
The key data source for this study will
be a longitudinal file for each State that
will be built by requesting caseload data
from each study State for a period of
time beginning 12 months before the
implementation of an intervention and
continuing through 12 months after
implementation.
Affected Public: Respondent
categories of affected public and the
corresponding study participants will
include: State and Local or Tribal
Government [Agency SNAP Directors
and selected State and county
government staff], Non-profit Business
organizations [Organizations serving
elderly individuals and Community
Based Organizations], and Individuals &
Households [Elderly 60+ Recipients,
Non-recipients, and Non-participating
applicants].
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,018 (675 Individuals/Households, 90
Businesses and 253 State employees).
Out of the 1,018 contacted, 660 are
estimated to participate as respondents
and 358 are estimated to not partake,
who are considered our non-respondent
group. The break out is as follows: The
total estimated number of respondents
includes: Out of 13 State SNAP
Directors, 10 State SNAP Directors will
participate; out of 70 State SNAP
Administrative Staff, 70 State SNAP
Administrative Staff will participate;
out of 675 Individuals/Households, 360
Individuals Households (Elderly SNAP
Recipients 60+ and Non-recipients, and
Non-participating applicants) will
participate; out of 50 Non-profit
Organizations (Organizations serving
elderly individuals) contacted, 40 will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 May 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
participate; out of 20 County
Government SNAP Directors contacted,
20 will participate; out of 50 State and
County Staff (Partner Agencies)
contacted, 30 will participate; out of 100
County SNAP Staff contacted, 100 will
participate; and out of 40 Non-profit
Organizations (Community Based
Organizations) contacted, 30 will.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.28.
The estimated number of responses
per State Government SNAP Director is
two: 10 State SNAP Directors will
complete a Memorandum of
Understanding with the research team;
the same 10 State SNAP Directors will
also take part in an interview lasting
approximately 1 hour.
The estimated number of responses
per State SNAP Administrative Staff is
one: 20 respondents will prepare and
provide caseload data files; 50 other
respondents will take part in an
interview.
The estimated number of responses
per Individual Household (Elderly
SNAP Recipients and Non-recipients) is
one: 200 respondents will take part in
an interview; 80 other respondents will
take part in a focus group discussion
(additionally, 395 other elderly
individuals will be screened and/or
have an interview or focus group
scheduled but will not complete that
activity).
The estimated number of responses
per Non-profit Organization
(Organizations serving elderly
individuals) is one: 40 respondents will
provide assistance with recruiting
participants for interviews and focus
groups.
The estimated number of responses
per Non-profit Organizations
(Community Based Organizations) is
one: 30 respondents will participate in
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24665
interviews as part of the study of State
interventions.
The estimated number of responses
per County Government SNAP Director
is one: 20 respondents will take part in
an interview.
The estimated number of responses
per State and County Staff (Partner
Agencies) is one: 30 respondents will
take part in an interview.
The estimated number of responses
per County SNAP Staff is one: 100
respondents will take part in an
interview.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
1,308.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.0515
hours.
The estimated time of response varies
from one to 20 hours depending on
respondent group and data collection
activity, as shown in the table below,
with an average estimated time of 1.53
hours for all participants (the average
estimated time is .10 hours for nonrespondents). Twenty State SNAP
Administrative Staff will spend an
estimated 20 hours to prepare and
provide caseload data files, and 10 State
Government SNAP Directors will spend
an estimated 10 hours to complete a
Memorandum of Understanding with
the research team. All other data
collection activities produce a burden of
1.5 hours or less.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,375.40 hours.
See Table 1 below for estimated total
annual burden for each type of
respondent.
Dated: May 18, 2017.
Jessica Shahin,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
24666
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices
Table 1: Estimated Total Burden per Respondent Type
200.0
1.0
200.0
1.0
200.0
80.0
1.0
80.0
0.1
6.4
206.4
80.0
1.0
80.0
1.5
120.0
35.0
1.0
35.0
0.1
2.8
122.8
10.0
1.0
10.0
10.0
100.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
3.0
9.0
109.0
10.0
1.0
10.0
1.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
1.0
20.0
20.0
400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
400.0
50.0
1.0
50.0
1.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
20.0
1.0
20.0
1.0
20.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
50.0
30.0
1.0
30.0
1.0
30.0
20.0
1.0
20.0
0.1
1.6
31.6
100.0
100.0
1.0
100.0
1.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
23.0
1.0
23.0
0.5
10.6
720.6
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
20.0
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 May 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
EN30MY17.012
Director*
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2017–11028 Filed 5–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Study of School
Food Authority (SFA) Procurement
Practices
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This collection is a new information
collection for the Study of School Food
Authority (SFA) Procurement Practices.
This study is intended to describe and
assess the practices of SFAs related to
procuring goods and services for school
meal programs (e.g., National School
Lunch Program [NSLP] and the School
Breakfast Program [SBP]), and to better
understand how SFAs make decisions
that lead to these procurement practices.
The SFA Procurement Practices study
will go beyond previous studies that
concentrated on single food service or
Child Nutrition programs (e.g., NSLP,
SBP, or the Summer Food Service
Program [SFSP]) or studies that focused
on single procurement practices (e.g.,
use of Food Service Management
Companies [FSMCs]) at the SFA level.
This collection includes a mixedmethods approach of qualitative and
quantitative information utilizing a
structured web-based survey, as well as
in-depth interviews (IDIs) to be
conducted by telephone. Data will be
collected from a subsample of the SFA
population participating in the second
year of the Child Nutrition Program
Operations Study-II (CN–OPS II) (OMB
Number 0584–0607).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 May 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Ashley
Chaifetz, Ph.D., Social Science Research
Analyst, Special Nutrition Evaluation
Branch, Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Ashley Chaifetz at 703–305–2576 or
via email to Ashley.Chaifetz@
fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. All comments will be
a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project, contact Ashley
Chaifetz, Ph.D., Social Science Research
Analyst, Special Nutrition Evaluation
Branch, Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22302; Fax: 703–305–
2576; Email: Ashley.Chaifetz@
fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Study of School Food Authority
(SFA) Procurement Practices (SFA
Procurement Practices Study).
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The SFA Procurement
Practices Study will describe and
evaluate the decision-making processes
of SFAs regarding school food
procurement practices. Using a
nationally representative sample of
SFAs, this study will be one of the first
FNS studies of SFA procurement
practices for school meal programs to
comprehensively examine food service
management companies, group
purchasing agreements, recordkeeping,
local food purchases, and food purchase
specifications.
The Richard B. Russell National
School Lunch Act and Child Nutrition
Act provide the legislative authority for
the NSLP and the SBP. FNS administers
the NSLP and the SBP at the Federal
level, in addition to other meal
programs at schools, including the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24667
SFSP, Child and Adult Care Food
Program (CACFP), and Special Milk
Program for Children (SMP). At the
State level, school meal programs are
administered by State agencies
(typically State Departments of
Education or Agriculture).
Approximately 20,000 SFAs, which can
consist of a school, school district, or
multiple districts, are responsible for
administering and ensuring eligibility is
met for the school meal programs,
including procurement. School food
procurement consists mainly of
commercial food purchases, but USDA
Foods also make up a portion of the
items purchased.
For each meal served by the NSLP,
the SFA receives entitlement dollars to
purchase USDA Foods, which can
include purchasing items directly from
the USDA or diverting bulk ingredients
for further processing. SFAs can also
use their entitlement dollars to purchase
fresh produce from the USDA
Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and
Vegetable program (USDA DoD Fresh)
or the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Program (FFVP). Additionally, some
SFAs contract with an FSMC to manage
on-site operations, including
procurement; others enter into group
purchasing agreements or use
procurement methods such as small and
micro-purchases.
The objectives of the study include
the following:
• Identify and describe the means
through which self-operating SFAs
develop and publish solicitations,
evaluate and award contracts, and
monitor procurement contracts for all
school food purchases.
• Identify and describe the rationale,
procedures, and recordkeeping practices
used by SFAs with respect to their
contracts with FSMCs.
• Identify and describe the forms of
cooperative purchasing arrangements
SFAs use to purchase food products and
services.
• Assess the strengths and
weaknesses of SFAs with respect to
procurement-related expertise in
developing solicitation and contract
documents, evaluating bids/responses,
negotiating terms and conditions, and
assessing the availability of State
agency-provided technical assistance
and training resources.
The SFA Procurement Practices Study
will assist FNS to better understand
SFA procurement practices by
identifying the ways SFAs make
decisions about procuring goods and
services and the outcomes of such
decisions.
The activities to be undertaken
subject to this notice include (1)
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24664-24667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11028]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities, Comments Request:
Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve Elderly Access
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on the proposed collection of information for the Evaluation of
Alternatives to Improve Elderly Access. This is a NEW information
collection. This study will provide FNS with a better understanding of
the barriers to serving elderly populations in the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the extent to which available
policy options improve program access, whether certain program models
or combinations are more effective than others, and what tradeoffs
exist between program simplification/access goals and ensuring benefit
adequacy.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 31, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy
Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention of Kameron Burt at 703-305-
2576 or via email to kameron.burt@fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the
proposed project, or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans
contact Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy Analyst, Office of Policy
Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1014, Alexandria, VA 22302; Fax: 703-305-2576; Email:
kameron.burt@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve Elderly Access.
Form Number: [If applicable, insert number].
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), under authorization
of SEC. 17. [7 U.S.C. 2026] of the FOOD AND NUTRITION ACT OF 2008, as
amended, intends to conduct the Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve
Elderly Access. FNS is interested in exploring whether policy options
designed to improve access to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) for the elderly are effective. The objective of the
study is to better understand how to maximize elder (60+) access to
SNAP. The evaluation will have four key components:
(1) Exploratory Study: To ground the study plan and subsequent
components of the study, the project began with an initial exploratory
research phase to determine what is known about elder SNAP
participation levels and caseload dynamics over time, factors
influencing elder participation in SNAP, and the scope, range, and
effects of State interventions for elders to date. The exploratory
study drew primarily on existing data, including SNAP Quality Control
(QC) data from Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 and an index of State policy
options, and a literature review, supplemented by discussions with FNS
Regional and National office staff and experts from advocacy groups.
(2) Study of State Interventions: The Study of State Interventions
will document the design, implementation, and operation of
interventions intended to increase access to SNAP among the elderly
population in the selected States. This component will provide a
comprehensive understanding of the interventions, helping us to
interpret the effects or lack thereof observed in the Study of
Intervention Effects, draw lessons on how aspects of the interventions
may be improved, and assess whether the interventions, if implemented
in other locations or contexts, might yield similar outcomes. The
primary source of data for this study component will be the extensive
information collected during three-day site visits to each of the ten
selected States.
(3) Study of elder participant perspectives: The purpose of the
study is to gather direct input from elders about their awareness of
SNAP, perceptions of the program, and experiences applying for and
receiving SNAP benefits. Key data collection activities for this
component will include: Phone screenings with elderly individuals to
confirm eligibility and schedule interviews (560 individuals will be
screened to result in 280 scheduled interviews); semi-structured
interviews with 200 elderly eligible individuals (out of the 280
scheduled interviews) grouped into three categories (SNAP participants,
non-participating applicants, and non-participants). FNS plans to
contact or recruit another 115 individuals 60+ to participate in the
focus group. Out of the 115 contacted, 80 will go on to participate in
the actual focus group. These focus groups will be used to validate and
explore key themes that emerge in the interviews. Overall, the
expectation is that out of the total 675 elderly individuals contacted,
395 will not respond or choose not to take part in the study.
(4) Study of State Intervention Effects: The objective of the Study
of State Intervention Effects is to assess the relative association
between State interventions and key program outcomes, including elderly
SNAP application trends and caseloads, and rates of churning. The focus
of this analysis will be on the interventions that are specifically
targeted to elderly households (in addition to the Community Partner
Interview Demonstration (CPID)). The study team identified the
following interventions as being of particular interest to the study
because they either aim at increasing the enrollment of elderly
participants or hold particular promise in this regard: Elderly
Simplified Application Project (ESAP); Standard Medical Deduction
(SMD); CPID; Combined Application
[[Page 24665]]
Project (CAP); participating in a 36-Month Certification Demonstration;
and having a 36-month certification or recertification interview
waiver.
The key data source for this study will be a longitudinal file for
each State that will be built by requesting caseload data from each
study State for a period of time beginning 12 months before the
implementation of an intervention and continuing through 12 months
after implementation.
Affected Public: Respondent categories of affected public and the
corresponding study participants will include: State and Local or
Tribal Government [Agency SNAP Directors and selected State and county
government staff], Non-profit Business organizations [Organizations
serving elderly individuals and Community Based Organizations], and
Individuals & Households [Elderly 60+ Recipients, Non-recipients, and
Non-participating applicants].
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,018 (675 Individuals/Households,
90 Businesses and 253 State employees).
Out of the 1,018 contacted, 660 are estimated to participate as
respondents and 358 are estimated to not partake, who are considered
our non-respondent group. The break out is as follows: The total
estimated number of respondents includes: Out of 13 State SNAP
Directors, 10 State SNAP Directors will participate; out of 70 State
SNAP Administrative Staff, 70 State SNAP Administrative Staff will
participate; out of 675 Individuals/Households, 360 Individuals
Households (Elderly SNAP Recipients 60+ and Non-recipients, and Non-
participating applicants) will participate; out of 50 Non-profit
Organizations (Organizations serving elderly individuals) contacted, 40
will participate; out of 20 County Government SNAP Directors contacted,
20 will participate; out of 50 State and County Staff (Partner
Agencies) contacted, 30 will participate; out of 100 County SNAP Staff
contacted, 100 will participate; and out of 40 Non-profit Organizations
(Community Based Organizations) contacted, 30 will.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.28.
The estimated number of responses per State Government SNAP
Director is two: 10 State SNAP Directors will complete a Memorandum of
Understanding with the research team; the same 10 State SNAP Directors
will also take part in an interview lasting approximately 1 hour.
The estimated number of responses per State SNAP Administrative
Staff is one: 20 respondents will prepare and provide caseload data
files; 50 other respondents will take part in an interview.
The estimated number of responses per Individual Household (Elderly
SNAP Recipients and Non-recipients) is one: 200 respondents will take
part in an interview; 80 other respondents will take part in a focus
group discussion (additionally, 395 other elderly individuals will be
screened and/or have an interview or focus group scheduled but will not
complete that activity).
The estimated number of responses per Non-profit Organization
(Organizations serving elderly individuals) is one: 40 respondents will
provide assistance with recruiting participants for interviews and
focus groups.
The estimated number of responses per Non-profit Organizations
(Community Based Organizations) is one: 30 respondents will participate
in interviews as part of the study of State interventions.
The estimated number of responses per County Government SNAP
Director is one: 20 respondents will take part in an interview.
The estimated number of responses per State and County Staff
(Partner Agencies) is one: 30 respondents will take part in an
interview.
The estimated number of responses per County SNAP Staff is one: 100
respondents will take part in an interview.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 1,308.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.0515 hours.
The estimated time of response varies from one to 20 hours
depending on respondent group and data collection activity, as shown in
the table below, with an average estimated time of 1.53 hours for all
participants (the average estimated time is .10 hours for non-
respondents). Twenty State SNAP Administrative Staff will spend an
estimated 20 hours to prepare and provide caseload data files, and 10
State Government SNAP Directors will spend an estimated 10 hours to
complete a Memorandum of Understanding with the research team. All
other data collection activities produce a burden of 1.5 hours or less.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,375.40 hours.
See Table 1 below for estimated total annual burden for each type
of respondent.
Dated: May 18, 2017.
Jessica Shahin,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
[[Page 24666]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY17.012
[[Page 24667]]
[FR Doc. 2017-11028 Filed 5-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C