Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 24346-24349 [2017-10879]
Download as PDF
24346
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 101 / Friday, May 26, 2017 / Notices
The registration deadline to attend the
meeting in-person or via teleconference,
and to request to make a brief oral
statement at the meeting, is June 22,
2017. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for instructions of
how to register.
ADDRESSES: The public peer review
meeting will be held at the St. Gregory
Hotel, located at 2033 M Street NW.,
Washington, DC. The phone number for
the teleconference line will be provided
to registered observers prior to the
meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding logistics or
registration for the external peer review
meeting should be directed to ERG, 110
Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421;
by email peerreview@erg.com (subject
line: Lead in Drinking Water Peer
Review); or by phone: (781) 674–7362
(ask for Laurie Waite).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Registration Instructions
To attend the peer review meeting as
an observer, either in-person or via
teleconference, register no later than
June 22, 2017. You may register (1)
online at https://projects.erg.com/
conferences/peerreview/register-leaddrinkwater.htm; (2) by sending an email
to peerreview@erg.com (subject line:
Lead in Drinking Water Peer Review
Meeting) and include your name, title
and affiliation, full address, email and
phone number, or (3) by phone at (781)
674–7362 (ask for Laurie Waite). Please
indicate which day(s) you plan to attend
the meeting and whether you plan to
attend the meeting via teleconference or
in-person. Space is limited and
registrations will be accepted on a firstcome, first-served basis. There will be a
limited amount of time for oral
statements from the public at the
beginning of the peer review meeting on
the first day. If you wish to make an oral
statement during the meeting, you must
notify ERG of your request to speak by
registering no later than June 22, 2017.
ERG will accept requests to make oral
statements on a first-come, first-served
basis, and may limit the amount of time
for each speaker as well as the number
of speakers due to time constraints. ERG
will notify speakers of specific time
limits for their oral statements prior to
the meeting.
II. Information on the Draft Lead
Modeling Report and Peer Review
Charge Questions
EPA announced the release of the
draft lead modeling report and draft
peer review charge questions for
purposes of public comment on January
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 May 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
19, 2017, in the Federal Register (82 FR
6546). The original 45-day public
comment period ended on March 6,
2017, but the public comment period
was extended 30 days to April 5, 2017,
due to stakeholders’ request. EPA will
consider peer reviewer and public
comments when finalizing the draft lead
modeling report. EPA also obtained
public comment on the draft peer
review charge questions. The final
charge questions, the draft lead
modeling report and public comments
submitted during the public comment
period may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov. (Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0686).
III. Final List of Peer Reviewers
Consistent with guidelines for the
peer review of highly influential
scientific assessments, EPA tasked ERG,
a contractor, to assemble a panel of
experts to evaluate the draft lead
modeling report. ERG received 14
nominations in response to EPA’s
January 19, 2017, Federal Register
notice (82 FR 6546) requesting
nominations and identified over 40
additional potential candidates through
its own search process. From this set, a
total of 26 experts responded to ERG to
indicate their interest in and
qualifications for this review. After
evaluating these 26 individuals against
the selection criteria described in the
Federal Register notice, ERG identified
an interim list of 13 qualified
candidates. EPA solicited public
comments on the interim list on March
20, 2017, in the Federal Register (82 FR
14361). ERG considered the public
comments received and consulted with
EPA’s Science Integrity Official.
Considering all these inputs, ERG
selected 8 final peer reviewers who,
collectively, best meet EPA’s selection
criteria, provide expertise spanning the
multiple subject matter areas covered by
the draft lead modeling report, and to
the extent feasible, best provide a
balance of perspectives. The final 8
selected peer reviewers are provided as
follows.
Name of Peer Reviewer, Degree, Place of
Employment
1. Panos Georgopoulos, Ph.D., Rutgers
University
2. Philip Goodrum, Ph.D., Integral
Consulting, Inc.
3. Ian von Lindern, Ph.D., TerraGraphics
International
4. Anne Loccisano, Ph.D., Exponent,
Inc.
5. Marc A. Nascarella, Ph.D.,
Massachusetts Department of Public
Health
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
`
´
6. Michele Prevost, Ph.D.,
Polytechnique Montreal
7. P. Barry Ryan, Ph.D., Emory
University
8. Kathleen Vork, Ph.D., California
Office of Environment Health
Hazard Assessment
EPA requests that no individual or
organization in any way contact the peer
reviewers regarding the subject of the
peer review meeting, send them written
materials regarding the subject of the
meeting, or make any offers or requests
to any of them that appear to be linked
to their participation in the peer review.
ERG will direct the reviewers to report
any such contacts directly to ERG, and
take appropriate action in consultation
with EPA to ensure the independence
and impartiality of the peer review.
IV. Information About the Peer Review
Meeting
EPA has charged the peer reviewers
with evaluating and preparing written
comments on the draft lead modeling
report. Specifically, reviewers will work
individually to provide general
comments, their overall impressions of
the draft lead modeling report, and
responses to the charge questions.
Reviewers will also consider the
appropriateness of the quality, accuracy,
and relevance of the data in the lead
modeling report. Prior to the meeting,
ERG will provide the peer
reviewers with a summary of the
public comments (along with the full
text of all comments) on the draft lead
modeling report and peer review charge
questions that were submitted to EPA’s
public docket (Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2016–0686) during the public
comment period.
Dated: May 8, 2017.
Michael H. Shapiro,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
Water.
[FR Doc. 2017–10933 Filed 5–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
[No. 2017–N–06]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
ACTION: 30-Day notice of submission of
information collection for approval from
Office of Management and Budget.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 101 / Friday, May 26, 2017 / Notices
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA
or the Agency) is seeking public
comments concerning a new
information collection known as
‘‘Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good
Faith Efforts.’’ This information
collection has not yet been assigned a
control number by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). FHFA
intends to submit the information
collection to OMB for review and
approval of a three-year control number.
DATES: Interested persons may submit
comments on or before June 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Washington, DC 20503, Fax: (202) 395–
3047, Email: OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov. Please also submit
comments to FHFA, identified by
‘‘Proposed Collection; Comment
Request: ‘Contractor Workforce
Inclusion Good Faith Efforts, (No. 2017–
N–06)’ ’’ by any of the following
methods:
• Agency Web Site: www.fhfa.gov/
open-for-comment-or-input.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by email to FHFA at
RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure
timely receipt by the agency.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: The mailing
address for comments is: Alfred M.
Pollard, General Counsel, Federal
Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Eighth Floor, Washington,
DC 20219. Courier/Hand Delivery
packages must be delivered on business
days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
We will post all public comments we
receive without change, including any
personal information you provide, such
as your name and address, email
address, and telephone number, on the
FHFA Web site at https://www.fhfa.gov.
In addition, copies of all comments
received will be available for
examination by the public on business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and
3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance
Agency, Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. To
make an appointment to inspect
comments, please call the Office of
General Counsel at (202) 649–3804.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharron Levine, Director, Office of
Minority and Women Inclusion,
Sharron.Levine@fhfa.gov, (202) 649–
3496; Karen Lambert, Associate General
Counsel, Karen.Lambert@fhfa.gov, (202)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 May 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
649–3094; or Eric Raudenbush,
Associate General Counsel,
Eric.Raudenbush@fhfa.gov, (202) 649–
3084 (these are not toll-free numbers);
Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC
20219. The Telecommunications Device
for the Hearing Impaired is (800) 877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Need for and Use of the Information
Collection
Section 342(a)(1)(A) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank
Act) requires FHFA and certain other
Federal agencies each to establish an
Office of Minority and Women
Inclusion (OMWI) responsible for all
matters of the agency relating to
diversity in management, employment,
and business activities.1 Section
342(c)(1) requires the OMWI Director at
each agency to develop and implement
standards and procedures to ensure, to
the maximum extent possible, the fair
inclusion and utilization of minorities,
women, and minority- and womenowned businesses in all business and
activities of the agency at all levels,
including procurement, insurance, and
all types of contracts. Section 342(c)(2)
requires that the OMWI Director include
in the agency’s procedures for
evaluating contract proposals and hiring
service providers a component that
gives consideration to the diversity of an
applicant, to the extent consistent with
applicable laws. That statutory
provision also requires that each
agency’s procedures include a written
statement that a contractor shall ensure,
to the maximum extent possible, the fair
inclusion of women and minorities in
the workforce of the contractor and, as
applicable, subcontractors.
Further, section 342(c)(3)(A) of the
Dodd-Frank Act requires that each
agency’s standards and procedures
include a procedure for determining
whether an agency contractor or
subcontractor has failed to make a good
faith effort to include minorities and
women in its workforce. If the OMWI
Director determines that a contractor or
subcontractor has failed to make such a
good faith effort, section 342(c)(3)(B)(i)
provides that the OMWI Director shall
recommend to the agency administrator
that the contract be terminated. Section
342(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, upon
receipt of such a recommendation, the
agency administrator may either
terminate the contract, make a referral to
the Office of Federal Contract
Compliance Programs (OFCCP) of the
1 12
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
Department of Labor, or take other
appropriate action.
As a means of implementing the
requirements of section 342(c) of the
Dodd-Frank Act, FHFA developed a
Minority and Women Inclusion Clause
(MWI Clause) that it now includes in all
Agency contracts with a dollar value
greater than the ‘‘simplified acquisition
threshold’’—currently, $150,000—
established in the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR).2 The MWI Clause
requires a contractor to confirm its
commitment to equal opportunity in
employment and contracting, and to
implement that commitment by
ensuring, to the maximum extent
possible consistent with applicable law,
the fair inclusion of minorities and
women in its workforce. The MWI
Clause also requires that a contractor
include the substance of the MWI
Clause in all subcontracts with a dollar
value greater than $150,000 awarded
under the contract. (Hereinafter,
contractors that are subject to the MWI
Clause and subcontractors that are
subject to a similar clause required to be
included in a subcontract are referred to
as ‘‘covered’’ contractors and
subcontractors.)
Finally, the MWI Clause requires a
contractor to provide, when requested
by FHFA, documentation demonstrating
that the contractor, as well as any
covered subcontractor, has made a good
faith effort to ensure the fair inclusion
of minorities and women in its
workforce. The MWI Clause provides
that such documentation may include,
but is not limited to: (1) The contractor’s
total number of employees, and the
number of minority and women
employees, by race, ethnicity, and
gender (e.g., an EEO–1 Employer
Information Report (Form EEO–1)); (2) a
list of the subcontracts the contractor
awarded including the dollar amount,
date of the award, and the ownership
status of the subcontractor by race,
ethnicity, and/or gender; (3) information
similar to that required under the first
item above for each subcontractor; and
(4) the contractor’s plan to ensure that
minorities and women have appropriate
opportunities to enter and advance
within its workforce, including outreach
efforts (hereinafter, a ‘‘workforce
inclusion plan’’). A request for
documentation by FHFA pursuant to
this provision of the MWI Clause would
constitute a ‘‘collection of information’’
within the meaning of the PRA.
While FHFA has included the MWI
Clause in all contracts with a dollar
value greater than $150,000
2 See FAR 2.101. The FAR appears at 48 CFR
chapter 1.
U.S.C. 5452.
Frm 00073
24347
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
24348
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 101 / Friday, May 26, 2017 / Notices
consummated since November 7, 2013,
the Agency has not, to this point, asked
any contractor or covered subcontractor
to provide documentation pursuant to
the clause. FHFA is now developing
procedures that the OMWI Director will
follow in determining whether covered
contractors and subcontractors have
made good faith efforts to comply with
the MWI Clause. The Agency expects
that, once it adopts those procedures, it
will begin to request the types of
documentation described in the MWI
Clause from covered contractors and
subcontractors.
The purpose of this information
collection is to fulfill the requirements
of section 342(c)(3)(B) of the DoddFrank Act. The collected information
will allow FHFA’s OMWI Director to
determine whether covered contractors
and subcontractors have complied with
their contractual obligations to make
good faith efforts to ensure, to the
maximum extent possible consistent
with applicable law, the fair inclusion
of minorities and women in their
respective workforces.
B. Burden Estimate
FHFA estimates that the average
annual burden imposed on all
respondents by this information
collection over the next three years will
be 368 hours. Because, as explained
below, the amount of burden imposed
upon a contractor by this information
collection will differ depending upon
whether the contractor has 50 or more
employees, FHFA has based its total
burden estimate on two separate sets of
calculations—(I) one for contractors and
subcontractors with 50 or more
employees (48 hours); and (II) another
for contractors and subcontractors with
fewer than 50 employees (320 hours).
FHFA includes the MWI Clause in
Agency contracts with a dollar value
greater than $150,000. Under the MWI
Clause, FHFA may also request
information about covered
subcontractors’ ownership status,
workforce demographics, and workforce
inclusion plans. Contractors would
request this information from their
covered subcontractors, who, because
the substance of the MWI Clause would
be included in their subcontracts, would
have a contractual obligation to keep
records and report data as required
under the MWI Clause.
FHFA data on the dollar value of
contracts awarded by the Agency from
the beginning of fiscal year 2013
through the third quarter of fiscal year
2016 shows that 63 contractors were
subject to the MWI Clause. FHFA
believes that 44 of those contractors
have 50 or more employees, while 19
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 May 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
contractors have fewer than 50
employees. FHFA estimates that no
more than two subcontracts with a
dollar value of $150,000 or more were
awarded by Agency contractors during
that same time period. Both of those
subcontractors have 50 or more
employees each. Thus, over the
preceding three years, a total of 65
contractors and subcontractors were
subject to the MWI Clause—46 of which
have 50 or more employees and 19 of
which have fewer than 50 employees.
Based on these figures, FHFA
estimates that, on average over the next
three years, 48 contractors and
subcontractors with 50 or more
employees and 20 contractors or
subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees will be subject to the MWI
Clause at any given time. For purposes
of these burden estimates, FHFA has
assumed that each contractor or
subcontractor will provide
documentation under the MWI Clause
once per year, although it is unlikely
that the Agency will actually request
documentation from every contractor
and subcontractor in every year.
I. Documentation Submitted by
Contractors With 50 or More Employees
FHFA estimates that the average
annual burden on contractors with 50 or
more employees will be 48 hours (0
recordkeeping hours + 48 reporting
hours).
Because Federal contractors with 50
or more employees are already required
to maintain the same types of records
that may be requested pursuant to the
MWI Clause under regulations
implementing Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 3 and Executive
Order 11246 (E.O. 11246),4 this
information collection will not impose
new recordkeeping burdens on such
contractors or subcontractors. FAR
52.222–26, Equal Opportunity, requires
that such contractors’ contracts and
subcontracts include a clause
implementing E.O. 11246. OFCCP
regulations require each contractor with
50 or more employees and a Federal
contract or subcontract of $50,000 or
more to maintain records on the race,
ethnicity, gender, and EEO–1 job
category of each employee.5 OFCCP
regulations also require each such
contractor to: (1) Demonstrate that it has
made a good faith effort to remove
identified barriers, expand employment
opportunities, and produce measureable
3 42
U.S.C. 2000e, et seq.
Order No. 11246, 30 FR 12319 (Sept. 28,
4 Exec.
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
II. Documentation Submitted by
Contractors With Fewer Than 50
Employees
FHFA estimates that the average
annual burden on contractors and
subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees will be 320 hours (300
recordkeeping hours + 20 reporting
hours).
OFCCP regulations require contractors
with fewer than 50 employees to
maintain records on the race, ethnicity,
and gender of each employee.8 FHFA
believes that such contractors also keep
EEO–1 job category information in the
normal course of business, despite the
fact that they are not required by law to
do so. However, contractors or
subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees may not have the type of
written program summary that is
required of larger contractors under the
OFCCP regulations or any similar
document that could be submitted as a
workforce inclusion plan under the
MWI Clause. Accordingly, such
contractors or subcontractors may need
to create a workforce inclusion plan to
comply with the MWI Clause.
In order to estimate the burden
associated with creating a workforce
inclusion plan, FHFA considered the
OFCCP’s burden estimates for the time
needed to develop the written program
6 See
41 CFR 60–2.17.
41 CFR 60–2.31.
8 See 41 CFR 60–3.4.
7 See
1965).
5 See 41 CFR 60–1.7.
PO 00000
results; 6 and (2) develop and maintain
a written program summary describing
the policies, practices, and procedures
that the contractor uses to ensure that
applicants and employees received
equal opportunities for employment and
advancement.7 In lieu of creating and
maintaining a separate workforce
inclusion plan to submit in satisfaction
of the MWI Clause, a contractor or
subcontractor with 50 or more
employees could submit the written
program summary that it is already
required to maintain under the OFCCP
regulations to demonstrate its good faith
efforts to ensure the fair inclusion of
minorities and women in its workforce.
With respect to reporting burden,
FHFA estimates that it will take each
contractor or subcontractor with 50 or
more employees approximately one
hour to retrieve, review, and submit the
documentation specified in the MWI
Clause. Thus, the estimate of the annual
burden upon contractors or
subcontractors with 50 or more
employees associated with reporting
requirements under this information
collection is 48 hours (48 respondents ×
1 hour per respondent).
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 101 / Friday, May 26, 2017 / Notices
summaries required under its
regulations.9 In its OMB Supporting
Statement, the OFCCP estimated that a
contractor with 1 to 100 employees
would take approximately 73 burden
hours to create an initial written
program summary. While the OFCCP
regulations require contractors to
perform time-consuming quantitative
analyses when developing their written
program summaries, such analyses
would not be required in connection
with the creation of a workforce
inclusion plan. For this reason, FHFA
believes that a contractor could develop
a workforce inclusion plan in about onethird of the time that it would take to
develop the written program summary
required under the OFCCP regulations.
FHFA estimates that a contractor or
subcontractor with fewer than 50
employees would spend approximately
25 hours creating a workforce inclusion
plan for the first time. The Agency
estimates that each contractor would
then spend approximately 10 hours
annually in updating and maintaining
its plan. This results in an estimated
average annual recordkeeping burden
over the next three years on each
contractor or subcontractor with fewer
than 50 employees of 15 hours [(25 + 10
+10)/3 years]. Thus, FHFA estimates
that the average annual recordkeeping
burden on all contractors and
subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees over the next three years will
be 300 hours (20 respondents × 15 hours
per respondent).
As with larger entities, FHFA
estimates that it will take each
contractor and subcontractor with fewer
than 50 employees approximately one
hour to retrieve, review, and submit the
documentation specified in the MWI
Clause. Thus, FHFA estimates that the
average annual reporting burden on all
contractors and subcontractors with
fewer than 50 employees over the next
three years will be 20 hours (20
respondents × 1 hour per respondent).
C. Comment Request
In accordance with the requirements
of 5 CFR 1320.8(d), FHFA published an
initial notice requesting comments
regarding this information collection in
the Federal Register on November 18,
2016.10 The 60-day comment period
closed on January 17, 2017. No
comments were received.
In accordance with the requirements
of 5 CFR 1320.10(a), FHFA is publishing
9 See PRA Supporting Statement for the OFCCP
Recordkeeping and Requirements-Supply and
Service Program, OMB Control No. 1250–0003, at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201602-1250-001.
10 See 81 FR 81766 (Nov. 18, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 May 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
this second notice to request comments
regarding the following: (1) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of FHFA
functions, including whether the
information has practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of FHFA’s estimates of the
burdens of the collection of information;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
members and project sponsors,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Comments
should be submitted in writing to both
OMB and FHFA as instructed above in
the Comments section.
Dated: May 19, 2017.
Kevin Winkler,
Chief Information Officer, Federal Housing
Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017–10879 Filed 5–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0179l Docket 2017–
0053 Sequence 5]
Information Collection; Service
Contracts Reporting Requirements
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an existing
information clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat Division will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve a new information
collection requirement for Service
Contracts Reporting Requirements.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 25, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to OMB Control 9000–0179, by
any of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching the OMB control number.
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with OMB Control
9000–0179 at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and ‘‘OMB
Control 9000–0179’’ on your attached
document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, FAR Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Joanne Sosa, 1800
F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite OMB Control 9000–0179,
in all correspondence related to this
case. Comments received generally will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
Analyst, Office of Acquisition Policy, at
202–501–1448 or via email at
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY:
24349
Section 743(a) of Division C of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010
(Pub. L. 111–117) requires executive
agencies covered by the Federal
Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act
(Pub. L. 105–270), except DoD, to
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) annually an inventory of
activities performed by service
contractors. DoD is exempt from this
reporting requirement because 10 U.S.C.
2462 and 10 U.S.C. 2330a(c) already
require DoD to develop an annual
service contract inventory.
House Report 111–366 notes, in
connection with section 743, that, ‘‘in
the absence of complete and reliable
information on the extent of their
reliance on service contractors, Federal
agencies are not well-equipped to
determine whether they have the right
balance of contractor and in-house
resources needed to accomplish their
missions. Therefore, this rule intends to
supplement agency annual service
contract reporting requirements with the
contractor provided service contract
reporting information.
The information is to be submitted
pursuant to clauses 52.204–14 and
52.204–15. Certain prime service
contractors will provide annually—
a. The contract number, and, as
applicable, order number;
b. The total dollar amount invoiced for
services performed during the
previous Government fiscal year
under the contract;
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 101 (Friday, May 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24346-24349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10879]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
[No. 2017-N-06]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency.
ACTION: 30-Day notice of submission of information collection for
approval from Office of Management and Budget.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), the
[[Page 24347]]
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA or the Agency) is seeking public
comments concerning a new information collection known as ``Contractor
Workforce Inclusion Good Faith Efforts.'' This information collection
has not yet been assigned a control number by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). FHFA intends to submit the information collection to
OMB for review and approval of a three-year control number.
DATES: Interested persons may submit comments on or before June 26,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer
for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Washington, DC 20503, Fax:
(202) 395-3047, Email: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. Please also submit
comments to FHFA, identified by ``Proposed Collection; Comment Request:
`Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith Efforts, (No. 2017-N-06)' ''
by any of the following methods:
Agency Web Site: www.fhfa.gov/open-for-comment-or-input.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your
comment to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by email
to FHFA at RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure timely receipt by the agency.
Mail/Hand Delivery: The mailing address for comments is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel, Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400
Seventh Street SW., Eighth Floor, Washington, DC 20219. Courier/Hand
Delivery packages must be delivered on business days between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m.
We will post all public comments we receive without change,
including any personal information you provide, such as your name and
address, email address, and telephone number, on the FHFA Web site at
https://www.fhfa.gov. In addition, copies of all comments received will
be available for examination by the public on business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. To make an
appointment to inspect comments, please call the Office of General
Counsel at (202) 649-3804.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharron Levine, Director, Office of
Minority and Women Inclusion, Sharron.Levine@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3496;
Karen Lambert, Associate General Counsel, Karen.Lambert@fhfa.gov, (202)
649-3094; or Eric Raudenbush, Associate General Counsel,
Eric.Raudenbush@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3084 (these are not toll-free
numbers); Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. The Telecommunications Device for the Hearing
Impaired is (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Need for and Use of the Information Collection
Section 342(a)(1)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) requires FHFA and
certain other Federal agencies each to establish an Office of Minority
and Women Inclusion (OMWI) responsible for all matters of the agency
relating to diversity in management, employment, and business
activities.\1\ Section 342(c)(1) requires the OMWI Director at each
agency to develop and implement standards and procedures to ensure, to
the maximum extent possible, the fair inclusion and utilization of
minorities, women, and minority- and women-owned businesses in all
business and activities of the agency at all levels, including
procurement, insurance, and all types of contracts. Section 342(c)(2)
requires that the OMWI Director include in the agency's procedures for
evaluating contract proposals and hiring service providers a component
that gives consideration to the diversity of an applicant, to the
extent consistent with applicable laws. That statutory provision also
requires that each agency's procedures include a written statement that
a contractor shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair
inclusion of women and minorities in the workforce of the contractor
and, as applicable, subcontractors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 U.S.C. 5452.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, section 342(c)(3)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that
each agency's standards and procedures include a procedure for
determining whether an agency contractor or subcontractor has failed to
make a good faith effort to include minorities and women in its
workforce. If the OMWI Director determines that a contractor or
subcontractor has failed to make such a good faith effort, section
342(c)(3)(B)(i) provides that the OMWI Director shall recommend to the
agency administrator that the contract be terminated. Section
342(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, upon receipt of such a recommendation,
the agency administrator may either terminate the contract, make a
referral to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)
of the Department of Labor, or take other appropriate action.
As a means of implementing the requirements of section 342(c) of
the Dodd-Frank Act, FHFA developed a Minority and Women Inclusion
Clause (MWI Clause) that it now includes in all Agency contracts with a
dollar value greater than the ``simplified acquisition threshold''--
currently, $150,000--established in the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR).\2\ The MWI Clause requires a contractor to confirm its
commitment to equal opportunity in employment and contracting, and to
implement that commitment by ensuring, to the maximum extent possible
consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and
women in its workforce. The MWI Clause also requires that a contractor
include the substance of the MWI Clause in all subcontracts with a
dollar value greater than $150,000 awarded under the contract.
(Hereinafter, contractors that are subject to the MWI Clause and
subcontractors that are subject to a similar clause required to be
included in a subcontract are referred to as ``covered'' contractors
and subcontractors.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See FAR 2.101. The FAR appears at 48 CFR chapter 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the MWI Clause requires a contractor to provide, when
requested by FHFA, documentation demonstrating that the contractor, as
well as any covered subcontractor, has made a good faith effort to
ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce. The
MWI Clause provides that such documentation may include, but is not
limited to: (1) The contractor's total number of employees, and the
number of minority and women employees, by race, ethnicity, and gender
(e.g., an EEO-1 Employer Information Report (Form EEO-1)); (2) a list
of the subcontracts the contractor awarded including the dollar amount,
date of the award, and the ownership status of the subcontractor by
race, ethnicity, and/or gender; (3) information similar to that
required under the first item above for each subcontractor; and (4) the
contractor's plan to ensure that minorities and women have appropriate
opportunities to enter and advance within its workforce, including
outreach efforts (hereinafter, a ``workforce inclusion plan''). A
request for documentation by FHFA pursuant to this provision of the MWI
Clause would constitute a ``collection of information'' within the
meaning of the PRA.
While FHFA has included the MWI Clause in all contracts with a
dollar value greater than $150,000
[[Page 24348]]
consummated since November 7, 2013, the Agency has not, to this point,
asked any contractor or covered subcontractor to provide documentation
pursuant to the clause. FHFA is now developing procedures that the OMWI
Director will follow in determining whether covered contractors and
subcontractors have made good faith efforts to comply with the MWI
Clause. The Agency expects that, once it adopts those procedures, it
will begin to request the types of documentation described in the MWI
Clause from covered contractors and subcontractors.
The purpose of this information collection is to fulfill the
requirements of section 342(c)(3)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Act. The
collected information will allow FHFA's OMWI Director to determine
whether covered contractors and subcontractors have complied with their
contractual obligations to make good faith efforts to ensure, to the
maximum extent possible consistent with applicable law, the fair
inclusion of minorities and women in their respective workforces.
B. Burden Estimate
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden imposed on all
respondents by this information collection over the next three years
will be 368 hours. Because, as explained below, the amount of burden
imposed upon a contractor by this information collection will differ
depending upon whether the contractor has 50 or more employees, FHFA
has based its total burden estimate on two separate sets of
calculations--(I) one for contractors and subcontractors with 50 or
more employees (48 hours); and (II) another for contractors and
subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees (320 hours).
FHFA includes the MWI Clause in Agency contracts with a dollar
value greater than $150,000. Under the MWI Clause, FHFA may also
request information about covered subcontractors' ownership status,
workforce demographics, and workforce inclusion plans. Contractors
would request this information from their covered subcontractors, who,
because the substance of the MWI Clause would be included in their
subcontracts, would have a contractual obligation to keep records and
report data as required under the MWI Clause.
FHFA data on the dollar value of contracts awarded by the Agency
from the beginning of fiscal year 2013 through the third quarter of
fiscal year 2016 shows that 63 contractors were subject to the MWI
Clause. FHFA believes that 44 of those contractors have 50 or more
employees, while 19 contractors have fewer than 50 employees. FHFA
estimates that no more than two subcontracts with a dollar value of
$150,000 or more were awarded by Agency contractors during that same
time period. Both of those subcontractors have 50 or more employees
each. Thus, over the preceding three years, a total of 65 contractors
and subcontractors were subject to the MWI Clause--46 of which have 50
or more employees and 19 of which have fewer than 50 employees.
Based on these figures, FHFA estimates that, on average over the
next three years, 48 contractors and subcontractors with 50 or more
employees and 20 contractors or subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees will be subject to the MWI Clause at any given time. For
purposes of these burden estimates, FHFA has assumed that each
contractor or subcontractor will provide documentation under the MWI
Clause once per year, although it is unlikely that the Agency will
actually request documentation from every contractor and subcontractor
in every year.
I. Documentation Submitted by Contractors With 50 or More Employees
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors with
50 or more employees will be 48 hours (0 recordkeeping hours + 48
reporting hours).
Because Federal contractors with 50 or more employees are already
required to maintain the same types of records that may be requested
pursuant to the MWI Clause under regulations implementing Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 \3\ and Executive Order 11246 (E.O.
11246),\4\ this information collection will not impose new
recordkeeping burdens on such contractors or subcontractors. FAR
52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, requires that such contractors' contracts
and subcontracts include a clause implementing E.O. 11246. OFCCP
regulations require each contractor with 50 or more employees and a
Federal contract or subcontract of $50,000 or more to maintain records
on the race, ethnicity, gender, and EEO-1 job category of each
employee.\5\ OFCCP regulations also require each such contractor to:
(1) Demonstrate that it has made a good faith effort to remove
identified barriers, expand employment opportunities, and produce
measureable results; \6\ and (2) develop and maintain a written program
summary describing the policies, practices, and procedures that the
contractor uses to ensure that applicants and employees received equal
opportunities for employment and advancement.\7\ In lieu of creating
and maintaining a separate workforce inclusion plan to submit in
satisfaction of the MWI Clause, a contractor or subcontractor with 50
or more employees could submit the written program summary that it is
already required to maintain under the OFCCP regulations to demonstrate
its good faith efforts to ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and
women in its workforce.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq.
\4\ Exec. Order No. 11246, 30 FR 12319 (Sept. 28, 1965).
\5\ See 41 CFR 60-1.7.
\6\ See 41 CFR 60-2.17.
\7\ See 41 CFR 60-2.31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to reporting burden, FHFA estimates that it will take
each contractor or subcontractor with 50 or more employees
approximately one hour to retrieve, review, and submit the
documentation specified in the MWI Clause. Thus, the estimate of the
annual burden upon contractors or subcontractors with 50 or more
employees associated with reporting requirements under this information
collection is 48 hours (48 respondents x 1 hour per respondent).
II. Documentation Submitted by Contractors With Fewer Than 50 Employees
FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors and
subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees will be 320 hours (300
recordkeeping hours + 20 reporting hours).
OFCCP regulations require contractors with fewer than 50 employees
to maintain records on the race, ethnicity, and gender of each
employee.\8\ FHFA believes that such contractors also keep EEO-1 job
category information in the normal course of business, despite the fact
that they are not required by law to do so. However, contractors or
subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees may not have the type of
written program summary that is required of larger contractors under
the OFCCP regulations or any similar document that could be submitted
as a workforce inclusion plan under the MWI Clause. Accordingly, such
contractors or subcontractors may need to create a workforce inclusion
plan to comply with the MWI Clause.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 41 CFR 60-3.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to estimate the burden associated with creating a
workforce inclusion plan, FHFA considered the OFCCP's burden estimates
for the time needed to develop the written program
[[Page 24349]]
summaries required under its regulations.\9\ In its OMB Supporting
Statement, the OFCCP estimated that a contractor with 1 to 100
employees would take approximately 73 burden hours to create an initial
written program summary. While the OFCCP regulations require
contractors to perform time-consuming quantitative analyses when
developing their written program summaries, such analyses would not be
required in connection with the creation of a workforce inclusion plan.
For this reason, FHFA believes that a contractor could develop a
workforce inclusion plan in about one-third of the time that it would
take to develop the written program summary required under the OFCCP
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See PRA Supporting Statement for the OFCCP Recordkeeping and
Requirements-Supply and Service Program, OMB Control No. 1250-0003,
at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201602-1250-001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FHFA estimates that a contractor or subcontractor with fewer than
50 employees would spend approximately 25 hours creating a workforce
inclusion plan for the first time. The Agency estimates that each
contractor would then spend approximately 10 hours annually in updating
and maintaining its plan. This results in an estimated average annual
recordkeeping burden over the next three years on each contractor or
subcontractor with fewer than 50 employees of 15 hours [(25 + 10 +10)/3
years]. Thus, FHFA estimates that the average annual recordkeeping
burden on all contractors and subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees over the next three years will be 300 hours (20 respondents x
15 hours per respondent).
As with larger entities, FHFA estimates that it will take each
contractor and subcontractor with fewer than 50 employees approximately
one hour to retrieve, review, and submit the documentation specified in
the MWI Clause. Thus, FHFA estimates that the average annual reporting
burden on all contractors and subcontractors with fewer than 50
employees over the next three years will be 20 hours (20 respondents x
1 hour per respondent).
C. Comment Request
In accordance with the requirements of 5 CFR 1320.8(d), FHFA
published an initial notice requesting comments regarding this
information collection in the Federal Register on November 18,
2016.\10\ The 60-day comment period closed on January 17, 2017. No
comments were received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 81 FR 81766 (Nov. 18, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with the requirements of 5 CFR 1320.10(a), FHFA is
publishing this second notice to request comments regarding the
following: (1) Whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of FHFA functions, including whether the
information has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FHFA's estimates
of the burdens of the collection of information; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on members
and project sponsors, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments should be
submitted in writing to both OMB and FHFA as instructed above in the
Comments section.
Dated: May 19, 2017.
Kevin Winkler,
Chief Information Officer, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-10879 Filed 5-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P