Project KISS, 23765-23766 [2017-10622]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
divestiture specified in paragraphs (e)
through (f) of this section.
(3) Disqualification pending
divestiture. Pending divestiture of
prohibited securities, an employee must
disqualify himself or herself, in
accordance with § 2635.402 of this title,
from participation in particular matters
which, as a result of continued
ownership of the prohibited securities,
would affect the financial interests of
the employee, or those of the spouse or
dependent child of the employee.
(g) Waivers. The DAEO may grant a
written waiver from this section based
on a determination that the waiver is
not inconsistent with 5 CFR part 2635
of this title or otherwise prohibited by
law and that, under the particular
circumstances, application of the
prohibition is not necessary to avoid the
appearance of an employee’s misuse of
position or loss of impartiality, or to
otherwise ensure confidence in the
impartiality and objectivity with which
the Commission’s programs are
administered, or in the case of a special
Government employee, divestiture
would result in substantial financial
hardship. A waiver under this
paragraph must be in writing and may
impose conditions, such as requiring
execution of a written disqualification.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 5601.103 Notice of disqualification when
seeking employment.
(a) An employee who has been
assigned to or is supervising work on a
particular matter that affects the
financial interests of a prospective
employer and who is required, in
accordance with § 2635.604(a) of this
title, to disqualify himself or herself
from participation in that matter shall
provide written notice of
disqualification to the DAEO within 3
business days. The DAEO shall inform
the employee’s supervisor that the
employee is disqualified from the
matter. Public filers must comply with
the notification requirements set forth in
§ 2635.607 of this title even when not
required to disqualify from participation
in a particular matter. Employees who
file a notification statement in
compliance with § 2635.607 of this title
are not required to file a separate notice
under this section.
(b) An employee may withdraw
written notice under paragraph (a) of
this section upon determining that
disqualification from participation in
the matter is no longer required. A
withdrawal of disqualification shall be
in writing and shall be provided to the
DAEO. The DAEO shall inform the
employee’s supervisor that the
employee is no longer disqualified from
the matter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 23, 2017
Jkt 241001
§ 5601.104 Prohibited outside
employment.
An employee shall not engage in
outside employment, either on a paid or
unpaid basis, with or for an entity on
the prohibited securities list described
in § 5601.102(b)(1)(i)–(b)(1)(vi).
§ 5601.105 Prior approval for outside
employment.
(a) Prior approval for outside
employment. An employee who wishes
to engage in outside employment, either
on a paid or unpaid basis, shall obtain
the prior written approval of the DAEO.
A request for such approval shall be
submitted in writing with sufficient
description of the employment to enable
the DAEO to give approval based on an
informed determination that the outside
employment is not expected to involve
conduct prohibited by statute or Federal
regulation, including paragraph (a) of
this section and part 2635 of this title.
The DAEO shall provide a copy of any
written approvals for outside
employment to the employee’s
supervisor.
(b) Scope of approval. An employee
must submit a new request for approval
upon either a significant change in the
nature or scope of the outside
employment or a change in the
employee’s Commission position or
assigned responsibilities.
[FR Doc. 2017–10613 Filed 5–23–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter I
RIN 3038–AE55
Project KISS
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Request for Information;
Correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is a correction to a
Request for Information published by
the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or
‘‘CFTC’’) in the Federal Register of May
9, 2017 regarding the submission by the
public of suggestions about how the
Commission’s existing rules,
regulations, or practices could be
applied in a simpler, less burdensome,
and less costly manner. This correction
changes the web address to which
suggestions may be submitted. The
incorrect web address appeared in two
places in the original document. To
avoid any confusion and to ensure the
public has all necessary information in
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23765
one place, the Request for Information is
being republished in full with the
corrected web address.
DATES: Suggestions must be received on
or before September 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
suggestions, identified by RIN number
3038–AE55, by any of the following
methods:
• The agency’s Web site, at
www.cftc.gov/projectkiss. Follow the
instructions for submitting a Project
KISS suggestion through the Public
Comment Form.
• Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
Mail, above.
Please submit your suggestions using
only one method.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Gill, Regulatory Reform Officer,
(202) 418–5713, mgill@cftc.gov,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1151 21st Street NW., Washington, DC
20581; or KISS@cftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 24, 2017, President Donald J.
Trump issued Executive Order 13777:
Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda (‘‘EO 13777’’). EO 13777 directs
federal agencies, among other things, to
designate a Regulatory Reform Officer
and establish a Regulatory Reform Task
Force. Although the CFTC, as an
independent federal agency,1 is not
bound by EO 13777, the Commission is
nevertheless commencing an agencywide review of its rules, regulations,
and practices to make them simpler, less
burdensome, and less costly. This
initiative is called Project KISS, which
stands for ‘‘Keep It Simple Stupid.’’ 2 In
support of these efforts, the Commission
has approved the solicitation of
suggestions from the public regarding
how the Commission’s existing rules,
regulations, or practices could be
applied in a simpler, less burdensome,
and less costly manner. The public may
submit Project KISS suggestions through
the Public Comment Form on the
1 Independent federal agencies exist outside of
the federal executive departments headed by a
Cabinet secretary and the Executive Office of the
President. See Humphrey’s Executor v. United
States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935); 5 U.S.C. 104.
2 See Remarks of Acting Chairman J. Christopher
Giancarlo before the 42nd Annual International
Futures Industry Conference in Boca Raton, FL,
Mar. 15, 2017, available at https://www.cftc.gov/
PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opagiancarlo-20.
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
23766
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Commission’s Web site, at
www.cftc.gov/projectkiss.
The Commission is not asking the
public to identify rules for revocation,
suspension, annulment, withdrawal,
limitation, amendment, modification,
conditioning or repeal. The submission
of a Project KISS suggestion will not
constitute a petition for issuance,
amendment, or repeal of a rule pursuant
to § 13.2 of the Commission’s
regulations,3 nor will it constitute a
request for an exemptive, no-action, or
interpretive letter pursuant to § 140.99
of the Commission’s regulations.4 The
Commission will treat Project KISS
suggestions like the Commission treats
other correspondence that it receives.
Submission of a Project KISS suggestion
may not result in Commission action.
All suggestions must be submitted in
English, or if not, accompanied by an
English translation. Suggestions will be
posted as received to www.cftc.gov. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. If
you wish to submit information that you
believe is exempt from disclosure under
the Freedom of Information Act in your
suggestion(s), please submit your
suggestion(s) via Mail or Hand Delivery/
Courier and also submit a petition for
confidential treatment of the exempt
information according to the procedures
established in § 145.9 of the
Commission’s regulations.5
The Commission reserves the right,
but shall have no obligation, to review,
pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or
remove any or all of your suggestion(s)
from www.cftc.gov that it may deem to
be inappropriate for publication, such as
a suggestion containing obscene
language. Any suggestions that contain
comments on the merits of an
outstanding proposed rulemaking will
be retained in the public comment file
for that rulemaking and considered as
required under the Administrative
Procedure Act and other applicable
laws. All suggestions that have been
redacted or removed that contain
comments on the merits of an
outstanding proposed rulemaking will
be retained in the public comment file
and will be considered as required
under the Administrative Procedure Act
and other applicable laws, and may be
accessible under the Freedom of
Information Act.
CFR 13.2.
CFR 140.99.
5 17 CFR 145.9.
4 17
17:40 May 23, 2017
[FR Doc. 2017–10622 Filed 5–23–17; 8:45 am]
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3000
[Docket No. RM2017–4; Order No. 3907]
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Jkt 241001
SUMMARY: The Commission proposes to
delete its existing ethics rules to avoid
duplication and those changes proposed
to by the Commission with the
concurrence of the Office of
Government Ethics.
DATES: Comments are due: June 23,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Summary of the Proposed Regulatory
Changes
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis of the
Proposed Changes to 39 CFR Subpart A
of Part 3000
V. Section-by-Section Analysis of the
Proposed Changes to the Title Identified
in Subchapter A of Chapter III of Title 39
VI. Administrative Actions
VII. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
The Postal Regulatory Commission
(Commission) establishes a rulemaking
docket to consider amending the
Commission’s ethics rules, 39 CFR
subpart A of part 3000. The Commission
proposes to delete its existing ethics
rules to avoid duplication of 5 CFR part
2635 and those changes proposed to 5
CFR part 5601 by the Commission with
the concurrence of the Office of
Government Ethics (OGE).1 This
rulemaking also proposes to replace the
deleted ethics rules with new rules that
reflect the Commission’s current
regulatory role under the Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act
(PAEA), Public Law 109–435, 120 Stat.
3198 (2006). The proposed rules aim to
treat employees’ and former employees’
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
interactions with the Postal Service
substantially the same as if those
interactions were with entities that are
not part of the federal government.
II. Background
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
1 See Order No. 3906, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking on Amendments to Supplemental
Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Postal Regulatory Commission, May 19, 2017.
3 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: May 19, 2017.
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
Sfmt 4702
A. The Existing 39 CFR Subpart A of
Part 3000
The ethics rules contained in 39 CFR
subpart A of part 3000 were adopted in
a 1971 rulemaking, in which the Civil
Service Commission promulgated
employee conduct regulations on the
Commission’s behalf.2 In 1993, the
Commission collaborated with OGE to
revise the Commission’s ethics rules in
39 CFR subpart A of part 3000. The
ethics rules in 39 CFR subpart A of part
3000 retained ‘‘those portions of the
current standards of conduct not
superseded by [OGE’s] amendments to
title 5 of the Code of Federal
Regulations and incorporate[d]
provisions of the Supplemental
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Postal Rate
Commission issued in 5 CFR part 5601
with the concurrence of [OGE].’’ 3 The
Commission amended the ethics rules
in 2001 to eliminate a redundant
provision.4
In 2006, the PAEA made several
changes to the Commission’s regulatory
role. Specifically, the PAEA eliminated
the responsibility to adjudicate omnibus
rate cases each year, which set rates for
all Postal Service products.5 Instead,
under the PAEA the Commission,
among other responsibilities, approves
or denies discrete Postal Service
requests to change rates of market
dominant products or competitive
products.6 Proposed rate changes
include requests to change rates of
general applicability, e.g., retail rates
available to the public, and rates not of
general applicability, e.g., negotiated
service agreements (NSAs) with private
parties. See id. Post-PAEA, the
Commission must make an Annual
Compliance Determination report
concerning whether the rates or fees in
effect for the year satisfied statutory and
regulatory requirements and whether
any service standards in effect during
2 See
36 FR 5412 (Mar. 23, 1971).
FR 42873 (Aug. 12, 1993).
4 66 FR 32544 (Jun. 15, 2001).
5 Public Law 109–435, 120 Stat. 3198, sections
201–202 (2006) (amending 39 U.S.C. 3621–3622
(2005) and repealing sections 3623–3624).
6 The PAEA introduced the division of Postal
Service products into market dominant products
(products delivered under the Postal Service
monopoly) and competitive products (all other
products). 39 U.S.C. 3621–3622 and 39 CFR part
3010 (regulation of rates for market dominant
products); 39 U.S.C. 3631–3634 and 39 CFR part
3015 (regulation of rates for competitive products).
3 58
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 24, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23765-23766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10622]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter I
RIN 3038-AE55
Project KISS
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION: Request for Information; Correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This is a correction to a Request for Information published by
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``Commission'' or ``CFTC'')
in the Federal Register of May 9, 2017 regarding the submission by the
public of suggestions about how the Commission's existing rules,
regulations, or practices could be applied in a simpler, less
burdensome, and less costly manner. This correction changes the web
address to which suggestions may be submitted. The incorrect web
address appeared in two places in the original document. To avoid any
confusion and to ensure the public has all necessary information in one
place, the Request for Information is being republished in full with
the corrected web address.
DATES: Suggestions must be received on or before September 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit suggestions, identified by RIN number 3038-
AE55, by any of the following methods:
The agency's Web site, at www.cftc.gov/projectkiss. Follow
the instructions for submitting a Project KISS suggestion through the
Public Comment Form.
Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the
Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as Mail, above.
Please submit your suggestions using only one method.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Gill, Regulatory Reform
Officer, (202) 418-5713, mgill@cftc.gov, Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street NW., Washington,
DC 20581; or KISS@cftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 24, 2017, President Donald J.
Trump issued Executive Order 13777: Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda (``EO 13777''). EO 13777 directs federal agencies, among other
things, to designate a Regulatory Reform Officer and establish a
Regulatory Reform Task Force. Although the CFTC, as an independent
federal agency,\1\ is not bound by EO 13777, the Commission is
nevertheless commencing an agency-wide review of its rules,
regulations, and practices to make them simpler, less burdensome, and
less costly. This initiative is called Project KISS, which stands for
``Keep It Simple Stupid.'' \2\ In support of these efforts, the
Commission has approved the solicitation of suggestions from the public
regarding how the Commission's existing rules, regulations, or
practices could be applied in a simpler, less burdensome, and less
costly manner. The public may submit Project KISS suggestions through
the Public Comment Form on the
[[Page 23766]]
Commission's Web site, at www.cftc.gov/projectkiss.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Independent federal agencies exist outside of the federal
executive departments headed by a Cabinet secretary and the
Executive Office of the President. See Humphrey's Executor v. United
States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935); 5 U.S.C. 104.
\2\ See Remarks of Acting Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo
before the 42nd Annual International Futures Industry Conference in
Boca Raton, FL, Mar. 15, 2017, available at https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opagiancarlo-20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission is not asking the public to identify rules for
revocation, suspension, annulment, withdrawal, limitation, amendment,
modification, conditioning or repeal. The submission of a Project KISS
suggestion will not constitute a petition for issuance, amendment, or
repeal of a rule pursuant to Sec. 13.2 of the Commission's
regulations,\3\ nor will it constitute a request for an exemptive, no-
action, or interpretive letter pursuant to Sec. 140.99 of the
Commission's regulations.\4\ The Commission will treat Project KISS
suggestions like the Commission treats other correspondence that it
receives. Submission of a Project KISS suggestion may not result in
Commission action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 17 CFR 13.2.
\4\ 17 CFR 140.99.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All suggestions must be submitted in English, or if not,
accompanied by an English translation. Suggestions will be posted as
received to www.cftc.gov. You should submit only information that you
wish to make available publicly. If you wish to submit information that
you believe is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information
Act in your suggestion(s), please submit your suggestion(s) via Mail or
Hand Delivery/Courier and also submit a petition for confidential
treatment of the exempt information according to the procedures
established in Sec. 145.9 of the Commission's regulations.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 17 CFR 145.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission reserves the right, but shall have no obligation, to
review, pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or remove any or all of your
suggestion(s) from www.cftc.gov that it may deem to be inappropriate
for publication, such as a suggestion containing obscene language. Any
suggestions that contain comments on the merits of an outstanding
proposed rulemaking will be retained in the public comment file for
that rulemaking and considered as required under the Administrative
Procedure Act and other applicable laws. All suggestions that have been
redacted or removed that contain comments on the merits of an
outstanding proposed rulemaking will be retained in the public comment
file and will be considered as required under the Administrative
Procedure Act and other applicable laws, and may be accessible under
the Freedom of Information Act.
Dated: May 19, 2017.
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-10622 Filed 5-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P