Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comments Requested National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), 23072-23073 [2017-10236]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
23072
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 96 / Friday, May 19, 2017 / Notices
Controlled substance
Drug code
Phenylacetone .................................................................................................................................................................
Coca Leaves ....................................................................................................................................................................
Opium, raw ......................................................................................................................................................................
Poppy Straw Concentrate ...............................................................................................................................................
The company plans to import the
listed controlled substances to bulk
manufacture into Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients for distribution to its
customers. Placement of these drug
codes onto the company’s registration
does not translate into automatic
approval of subsequent permit
applications to import controlled
substances.
In reference to drug code 7360
(Marihuana) the company plans to
import a synthetic cannabidiol. No other
activity for this drug code is authorized
for this registration.
Dated: May 15, 2017.
Louis J. Milione,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–10242 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Dated: May 10, 2017.
Andrew G. McCabe,
Acting Director.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Charter Reestablishment
[FR Doc. 2017–10095 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
In accordance with the provisions of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act,
Title 5, United States Code, Appendix,
and Title 41, Code of Federal
Regulations 101–6.1015, with the
concurrence of the Attorney General, I
have determined that the
reestablishment of the Criminal Justice
Information Services (CJIS) Advisory
Policy Board (APB) is in the public
interest. In connection with the
performance of duties imposed upon the
FBI by law, I hereby give notice of the
reestablishment of the APB Charter.
The APB provides me with general
policy recommendations with respect to
the philosophy, concept, and
operational principles of the various
criminal justice information systems
managed by the FBI’s CJIS Division.
The APB includes representatives
from local and state criminal justice
agencies; tribal law enforcement
representatives; members of the judicial,
prosecutorial, and correctional sectors
of the criminal justice community, as
well as one individual representing a
national security agency; a
representative of the National Crime
Prevention and Privacy Compact
Council; a representative of federal
agencies participating in the CJIS
Division Systems; and representatives of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 May 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
criminal justice professional
associations (i.e., the American
Probation and Parole Association;
American Society of Crime Laboratory
Directors; International Association of
Chiefs of Police; National District
Attorneys Association; National
Sheriffs’ Association; Major Cities
Chiefs Association; Major County
Sheriffs’ Association; and a
representative from a national
professional association representing
the courts or court administrators
nominated by the Conference of Chief
Justices). The Attorney General has
granted me the authority to appoint all
members to the APB.
The APB functions solely as an
advisory body in compliance with the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. The Charter has been
filed in accordance with the provisions
of the Act.
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0058]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested National
Incident-Based Reporting System
(NIBRS)
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
AGENCY:
Department of Justice (DOJ),
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register
allowing for a 60-day comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until June 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8501
9040
9600
9670
Schedule
II
II
II
II
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Mrs. Amy C.
Blasher, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, CJIS Division, Module
E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306;
facsimile (304) 625–3566. Written
comments and/or suggestions can also
be sent to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention
Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_
submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension with change, of a currently
approved collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
National Incident-Based Reporting
System.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Agency form number: 1110–0058.
Sponsoring component: Department of
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 96 / Friday, May 19, 2017 / Notices
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division.
Affected public who will be asked or
required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
federal, and tribal law enforcement
agencies. Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S.
Code, Section 534, Acquisition,
Preservation, and Exchange of
Identification Records; Appointment of
Officials, June 11, 1930; Public Law
109–177 (H.R. 3199), March 9, 2006,
USA Patriot Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005; Public Law
110–457, Title II, Section 237(a), (b),
December 23, 2008, the William
Wilberforce Trafficking Victims
Reauthorization Act of 2008, and
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes
Prevention Act, April 28, 2009, this
collection requests Incident data from
city, county, state, tribal and federal law
enforcement agencies in order for the
FBI UCR Program to serve as the
national clearinghouse for the collection
and dissemination of crime data and to
publish these statistics in Crime in the
United States, Hate Crime Statistics, and
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted. NIBRS is an incident-based
reporting system in which law
enforcement collects data on each crime
occurrence. Designed to be generated as
a byproduct of local, state, and federal
automated records systems, currently,
the NIBRS collects data on each
incident and arrest within 24 crime
categories made up of 52 specific crimes
called Group A offenses. For each of the
offenses coming to the attention of law
enforcement, various facts about the
crime are collected. In addition to the
Group A offenses, there are 10 Group B
offense categories for which only arrest
data are reported. The most significant
difference between NIBRS and the
traditional Summary Reporting System
(SRS) is the degree of detail in reporting.
In reporting data via the traditional SRS,
law enforcement agencies tally the
occurrences of ten Part I crimes. NIBRS
is capable of producing more detailed,
accurate, and meaningful data because
data are collected about when and
where crime takes place, what form it
takes, and the characteristics of its
victims and perpetrators. Although most
of the general concepts for collecting,
scoring, and reporting UCR data in the
SRS apply in the NIBRS, such as
jurisdictional rules, there are some
important differences in the two
systems. The most notable differences
that give the NIBRS an advantage over
the SRS are: No Hierarchy Rule, in a
multiple-offense incident NIBRS reports
every offense occurring during the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:15 May 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
incident where SRS would report just
the most serious offense and the lowerlisted offense would not be reported;
NIBRS provides revised, expanded, and
new offense definitions; NIBRS provides
more specificity in reporting offenses,
using NIBRS offense and arrest data for
24 Group A offense categories can be
reported while in the SRS ten Part I
offenses can be reported; NIBRS can
distinguish between attempted and
completed Group A crimes; NIBRS also
provides crimes against society while
the SRS does not; the victim-to-offender
data, circumstance reporting, drug
related offenses, offenders suspected use
of drugs, and computer crime is
expanded in NIBRS; the NIBRS update
reports are directly tied to the original
incident submitted. The Group A
offense categories include arson, assault
offenses, bribery, burglary/breaking and
entering, counterfeiting/forgery,
destruction/damage/vandalism of
property, drug/narcotic offenses,
embezzlement, extortion/blackmail,
fraud offenses, gambling offenses,
homicide offenses, human trafficking,
kidnapping/abduction, larceny/theft
offenses, motor vehicle theft,
pornography/obscene material,
prostitution offenses, robbery, sex
offenses, sex offenses/nonforcible,
stolen property offenses, and weapon
law violations. The Group B offense
categories include bad checks, curfew/
loitering/vagrancy violations, disorderly
conduct, DUI, drunkenness, family
offenses/nonviolent, liquor law
violations, peeping tom, trespass of real
property, and all other offenses.
Beginning in 2019, the NIBRS will also
collect additional data values to capture
data on domestic violence, cargo theft,
and negligent manslaughter.
(4) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: There are approximately
6,648 law enforcement agencies. The
amount of time estimated for an average
respondent to respond is two hours
monthly which totals to an annual hour
burden of 24 hours. The 2 hours to
respond is the time it takes for the
agencies records management system
(RMS) to download the NIBRS and send
to the FBI. By design, law enforcement
agencies generate NIBRS data as a byproduct of their RMS. Therefore, a law
enforcement agency builds its system to
suit its own individual needs, including
all of the information required for
administration and operation; then
forwards only the data required by the
NIBRS to participate in the FBI UCR
Program.
(5) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23073
collection: There are approximately
159,552 hours, annual burden,
associated with this information
collection. The total number of
respondents is 6,648 with a total annual
hour burden of 24 hours, (6,648 × 24 =
159,552 total annual hours). If
additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 16, 2017.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–10236 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On May 15, 2017, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota in
the lawsuit entitled United States and
Minnesota v. Mesabi Nugget Delaware,
LLC, Civil Action No. 0:17-cv-01606–
RHK.
The United States and Minnesota
filed this Complaint asserting 15 claims
under the Clean Air Act against Mesabi
Nugget Delaware, LLC, an iron nugget
producer that owns and operates a plant
located near Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota.
The Complaint alleges violations of
various emissions limits for mercury,
particulate matter, and other pollutants
as set forth in Mesabi Nugget’s Title V
Permit. Under the proposed Consent
Decree, Mesabi Nugget will pay
$150,000 as a civil penalty and agrees,
prior to restarting the currently idled
facility, to implement various measures
to improve its monitoring and control of
emissions and to comply with interim
emission limits while working with the
State to refine certain emission limits.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division and should refer to
United States and Minnesota v. Mesabi
Nugget Delaware, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–
5–2–1–10952. All comments must be
submitted no later than 30 days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 96 (Friday, May 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23072-23073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10236]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110-0058]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services Division will be submitting the
following information collection request to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal Register allowing for a 60-day
comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional
30 days until June 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated
public burden and associated response time, should be directed to Mrs.
Amy C. Blasher, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, CJIS
Division, Module E-3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West
Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 625-3566. Written comments and/or
suggestions can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of
Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent to
OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of
the following four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection: Extension with change, of a
currently approved collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: National Incident-Based Reporting
System.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection: Agency form number: 1110-0058.
Sponsoring component: Department of
[[Page 23073]]
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information
Services Division.
Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well
as a brief abstract: Primary: City, county, state, federal, and tribal
law enforcement agencies. Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S. Code, Section
534, Acquisition, Preservation, and Exchange of Identification Records;
Appointment of Officials, June 11, 1930; Public Law 109-177 (H.R.
3199), March 9, 2006, USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act
of 2005; Public Law 110-457, Title II, Section 237(a), (b), December
23, 2008, the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Reauthorization
Act of 2008, and Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, April 28,
2009, this collection requests Incident data from city, county, state,
tribal and federal law enforcement agencies in order for the FBI UCR
Program to serve as the national clearinghouse for the collection and
dissemination of crime data and to publish these statistics in Crime in
the United States, Hate Crime Statistics, and Law Enforcement Officers
Killed and Assaulted. NIBRS is an incident-based reporting system in
which law enforcement collects data on each crime occurrence. Designed
to be generated as a byproduct of local, state, and federal automated
records systems, currently, the NIBRS collects data on each incident
and arrest within 24 crime categories made up of 52 specific crimes
called Group A offenses. For each of the offenses coming to the
attention of law enforcement, various facts about the crime are
collected. In addition to the Group A offenses, there are 10 Group B
offense categories for which only arrest data are reported. The most
significant difference between NIBRS and the traditional Summary
Reporting System (SRS) is the degree of detail in reporting. In
reporting data via the traditional SRS, law enforcement agencies tally
the occurrences of ten Part I crimes. NIBRS is capable of producing
more detailed, accurate, and meaningful data because data are collected
about when and where crime takes place, what form it takes, and the
characteristics of its victims and perpetrators. Although most of the
general concepts for collecting, scoring, and reporting UCR data in the
SRS apply in the NIBRS, such as jurisdictional rules, there are some
important differences in the two systems. The most notable differences
that give the NIBRS an advantage over the SRS are: No Hierarchy Rule,
in a multiple-offense incident NIBRS reports every offense occurring
during the incident where SRS would report just the most serious
offense and the lower-listed offense would not be reported; NIBRS
provides revised, expanded, and new offense definitions; NIBRS provides
more specificity in reporting offenses, using NIBRS offense and arrest
data for 24 Group A offense categories can be reported while in the SRS
ten Part I offenses can be reported; NIBRS can distinguish between
attempted and completed Group A crimes; NIBRS also provides crimes
against society while the SRS does not; the victim-to-offender data,
circumstance reporting, drug related offenses, offenders suspected use
of drugs, and computer crime is expanded in NIBRS; the NIBRS update
reports are directly tied to the original incident submitted. The Group
A offense categories include arson, assault offenses, bribery,
burglary/breaking and entering, counterfeiting/forgery, destruction/
damage/vandalism of property, drug/narcotic offenses, embezzlement,
extortion/blackmail, fraud offenses, gambling offenses, homicide
offenses, human trafficking, kidnapping/abduction, larceny/theft
offenses, motor vehicle theft, pornography/obscene material,
prostitution offenses, robbery, sex offenses, sex offenses/nonforcible,
stolen property offenses, and weapon law violations. The Group B
offense categories include bad checks, curfew/loitering/vagrancy
violations, disorderly conduct, DUI, drunkenness, family offenses/
nonviolent, liquor law violations, peeping tom, trespass of real
property, and all other offenses. Beginning in 2019, the NIBRS will
also collect additional data values to capture data on domestic
violence, cargo theft, and negligent manslaughter.
(4) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: There are
approximately 6,648 law enforcement agencies. The amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to respond is two hours monthly
which totals to an annual hour burden of 24 hours. The 2 hours to
respond is the time it takes for the agencies records management system
(RMS) to download the NIBRS and send to the FBI. By design, law
enforcement agencies generate NIBRS data as a by-product of their RMS.
Therefore, a law enforcement agency builds its system to suit its own
individual needs, including all of the information required for
administration and operation; then forwards only the data required by
the NIBRS to participate in the FBI UCR Program.
(5) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: There are approximately 159,552 hours, annual
burden, associated with this information collection. The total number
of respondents is 6,648 with a total annual hour burden of 24 hours,
(6,648 x 24 = 159,552 total annual hours). If additional information is
required contact: Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer, United
States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite
3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 16, 2017.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017-10236 Filed 5-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P
