Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3, 22859-22862 [2017-10071]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The final
EIS for the NWMI Construction Permit
is in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML17130A862.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Drucker, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
6223; email: David.Drucker@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with § 51.118 of title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations, the
NRC is making available the final EIS
for the Construction Permit Application
for the NWMI facility. The draft EIS was
noticed by the NRC in the Federal
Register on November 9, 2016 (81 FR
78865), and noticed by the
Environmental Protection Agency on
November 10, 2016 (81 FR 79019). The
public comment period on the draft EIS
ended on December 29, 2016, and the
comments received are addressed in the
final EIS. The final EIS is available as
indicated in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Discussion
As discussed in Chapter 6 of the final
EIS, the NRC determined that after
weighing the environmental, economic,
technical, and other benefits against
environmental and other costs, and
considering reasonable alternatives, the
NRC staff recommends the issuance of
the construction permit to NWMI,
unless safety issues mandate otherwise.
This recommendation is based on (1)
NWMI’s Environmental Report, (2) the
NRC’s consultation with Federal, State,
and local agencies, (3) the NRC’s
independent environmental review; and
(4) the NRC’s consideration of public
comments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of May 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jeffery J. Rikhoff,
Acting Chief, Environmental Review and
Project Management Branch, Division of
License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2017–10072 Filed 5–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–133; NRC–2017–0117]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a partial
exemption in response to a March 9,
2017, request from the Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG&E or the
licensee). The issuance of the exemption
would grant the Humboldt Bay Power
Plant, Unit 3 (HBPP–3), a partial
exemption from regulations that require
the retention of records for certain
systems, structures, and components.
DATES: The exemption was issued on
May 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2017–0117 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2017–0117. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it available in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22859
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Hickman, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards; U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
3017; email: John.Hickman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The HBPP–3 facility is a
decommissioning power reactor located
in Humboldt County, California. The
PG&E is the holder of HBPP–3 Facility
Operating License No. DPR–7. On July
2, 1976, HBPP–3 was shut down for
annual refueling and to conduct seismic
modifications. In 1983, updated
economic analyses indicated that
restarting HBPP–3 probably would not
be cost-effective, and on June 27, 1983,
PG&E announced its intention to
decommission the unit. In 1984, PG&E
submitted the HBPP–3 SAFSTOR 1
Decommissioning Plan in support of the
application to amend the HBPP–3
operating license to a possession-only
license. On July 16, 1985, the NRC
issued Amendment No. 19 to the HBPP
Unit 3 Operating License (ADAMS
Legacy No. 8507260040) to change the
status to possess-but-not-operate, and
the plant was placed into a SAFSTOR
status. On December 11, 2008, PG&E
completed the transfer of spent fuel
from the HBPP–3 spent fuel pool (SFP)
into the Humboldt Bay Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation. PG&E
then began decontamination and
dismantlement of HBPP–3.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated March 9, 2017
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17068A095),
PG&E filed a request for NRC approval
of an exemption from the record
retention requirements of: (1) Part 50 of
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), appendix B,
Criterion XVII, which requires certain
records be retained consistent with
other regulatory requirements; (2) 10
CFR 50.59(d)(3), which requires certain
records be maintained until termination
of a license issued pursuant to 10 CFR
part 50; and (3) 10 CFR 50.71(c), which
requires certain records be maintained
1 ‘‘SAFSTOR’’ is a method of decommissioning in
which a nuclear facility is placed and maintained
in a condition that allows the facility to be safely
stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred
decontamination) to levels that permit release for
unrestricted use.
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
22860
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
consistent with various elements of the
NRC’s regulations, facility technical
specifications, and other licensing basis
documents.
The PG&E proposed to eliminate these
records for the nuclear power unit and
associated systems, structures, and
components (SSCs) that no longer exist,
including SSCs that were associated
with the decommissioning and storage
of spent fuel under the 10 CFR part 50
license for HBPP–3. The licensee cites
record retention exemptions granted to
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station,
Units 1, 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15355A055), LaCrosse Boiling Water
Reactor (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15355A103), Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Station (ADAMS
Accession No. ML15344A243), and Zion
Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2
(ADAMS Accession No. ML111260266),
as examples of the NRC granting similar
requests.
Records associated with residual
radiological activity and with
programmatic controls necessary to
support decommissioning, such as
security and quality assurance, are not
affected by the exemption request, and
would be retained as decommissioning
records until the termination of the
HBPP–3 license. In addition, the
licensee did not request an exemption
from 10 CFR part 50, appendix A,
Criterion 1, which requires certain
records to be maintained ‘‘throughout
the life of the unit,’’ because HBPP–3 is
not a general design criteria facility. Nor
did PG&E request an exemption
associated with any record keeping
requirements for storage of spent fuel at
the HBPP–3 ISFSI under 10 CFR part 72,
or for the other requirements of 10 CFR
part 50 or Facility Operating License
No. DPR–7 applicable to the
decommissioning and dismantlement of
the HBPP–3 plant.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when
the exemptions are authorized by law,
will not present an undue risk to public
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security.
However, the Commission will not
consider granting an exemption unless
special circumstances are present.
Special circumstances are described in
10 CFR 50.12(a)(2).
The March 9, 2017, exemption
application states that the HBPP–3 is in
an advanced state of decommissioning
and that there are no HBPP–3 SSCs
remaining at the site.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
With all the SSCs removed from the
site the need for the associated records
is eliminated. Therefore, the licensee
proposed that it be exempted from the
records retention requirements for SSCs
and historical activities associated with
the HBPP–3 licensing basis
requirements previously applicable to
the nuclear power unit and storage of
fuel in the SFP. The associated licensing
bases are no longer effective, thereby
eliminating the associated regulatory
and economic burdens of creating
alternative records storage locations,
relocating records, and retaining
irrelevant records.
The licensee states that the
radiological and other necessary
programmatic controls (such as security
and quality assurance) for the facility
and decommissioning activities are and
will continue to be appropriately
addressed through the license and
current plant documents such as the
updated Final Safety Analysis Report
and Technical Specifications. These
programmatic elements and their
associated records would be unaffected
by the requested exemption.
which would otherwise be retained
until license termination and require the
unnecessary expenditure of resources by
the licensee.
The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
The NRC has determined that granting
the licensee’s proposed exemption will
not result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, other
laws, or Commission regulations.
Therefore, the exemption from the
record keeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
is authorized by law.
The Exemption Is Consistent With
Common Defense and Security
The elimination of the record keeping
requirements does not involve
information or activities that could
potentially impact the common defense
and security of the United States. Upon
dismantlement of the affected SSCs, the
records have no functional purpose
relative to maintaining the safe
operation of the SSCs, maintaining
conditions that would affect the ongoing
health and safety of workers or the
public, or informing decisions related to
nuclear security.
Rather, the exemption requested is
administrative in nature and would only
advance the current schedule for
disposition of the specified records,
which would otherwise be retained
until license termination. This allows
the licensee to not expend resources
maintaining records that have no benefit
or security purpose. Therefore, the
partial exemption from the record
keeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
for the types of records associated with
the HBPP–3 licensing basis
requirements previously applicable to
the nuclear power unit, and safe storage
of fuel in the SFP and associated SSCs
that no longer remain on site, is
consistent with the common defense
and security.
The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk
to Public Health and Safety
Removal of the records for which
PG&E has requested an exemption from
record keeping requirements will not
have an adverse public health and safety
impact because the SSCs have been
removed from the site. Elimination of
records associated with the removed
SSCs, therefore, would not present an
undue risk to public health and safety.
The requested partial exemption from
the record keeping requirements of 10
CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix
B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) for records associated with
the HBPP–3 licensing basis
requirements previously applicable to
the nuclear power unit and associated
systems, including SSCs that are no
longer on site or part of the licensing
basis, is administrative in nature and
will have no impact on any remaining
decommissioning activities or on
radiological effluents. The exemption
will only advance the schedule for
disposition of the specified records,
Special Circumstances
Section 50.12(a)(2) requires that
special circumstances be present for the
Commission to consider granting an
exemption. Special circumstances
include application of the regulation in
the particular circumstances would not
serve the underlying purpose of the rule
or is not necessary to achieve the
underlying purpose of the rule, and
compliance with the regulation would
result in undue hardship or other costs
that are significantly in excess of those
contemplated when the regulation was
adopted.
Criterion XVII of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix B, requires that sufficient
records shall be maintained to furnish
evidence of activities affecting quality.
Section 50.59(d)(3) requires that the
records of changes in the facility must
be maintained until the termination of
an operating license.
Section 50.71(c), mandates that
records that are required by the
regulations in part 50, by license
condition, or by technical specifications
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
must be retained for the period specified
by the appropriate regulation, license
condition, or technical specification.
Additionally, if a retention period is not
otherwise specified, these records must
be retained until the Commission
terminates the facility license.
In the Statement of Considerations
(SOC) for the final rulemaking,
‘‘Retention Periods for Records’’ (53 FR
19240; May 27, 1988), the NRC stated
that records must be retained for the
NRC to ensure compliance with the
safety and health aspects of the nuclear
environment and for the NRC to
accomplish its mission to protect the
public health and safety. Also in the
SOC, the Commission explained that
requiring licensees to maintain adequate
records assists the NRC in judging
compliance and noncompliance, to act
on possible noncompliance, and to
examine facts as necessary following
any incident.
These regulations apply to licensees
in decommissioning despite the fact
that, during the decommissioning
process, safety-related SSCs are retired
or disabled and subsequently removed
from NRC licensing basis documents by
appropriate change mechanisms.
Appropriate removal of an SSC from the
licensing basis requires either a
determination by the licensee or an
approval from the NRC that the SSC no
longer has the potential to cause an
accident, event, or other problem, which
would adversely impact public health
and safety.
The records subject to removal under
the requested exemption are those
associated with SSCs that had been
important to safety during power
operation or operation of the SFP, but
are no longer capable of causing an
event, incident, or condition that would
adversely impact public health and
safety, given their appropriate removal
from the licensing basis documents. If
the SSCs no longer have the potential to
cause these scenarios, then certain
records associated with these SSCs
would not be necessary to assist the
NRC in determining compliance and
noncompliance, taking action on
possible noncompliance, and examining
facts following an incident. Therefore,
their retention would not serve the
underlying purpose of the rule.
Retention of certain records
associated with SSCs that are or will no
longer be part of the facility serves no
safety or regulatory purpose, nor does it
serve the underlying purpose of the rule
of maintaining compliance with the
safety and health aspects of the nuclear
environment in order to accomplish the
NRC’s mission. Accordingly, special
circumstances are present which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
NRC may consider, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), to grant the requested
exemption permitting the disposal of
records associated with the HBPP–3
licensing basis requirements previously
applicable to the nuclear power unit,
safe storage of fuel in the SFP, and
associated SSCs that no longer remain
on site.
Records that continue to serve the
underlying purpose of the rule, that is,
to maintain compliance and to protect
public health and safety in support of
the NRC’s mission, will continue to be
retained pursuant to the regulations in
10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72. The
retained records not subject to the
exemption include those associated
with programmatic controls, such as
those pertaining to residual
radioactivity, which continue to be
required for decommissioning; security,
emergency planning and quality
assurance programs which remain in
effect; as well as records associated with
the Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation and spent fuel assemblies.
The retention of records required by
10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50,
appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) provides assurance that
records associated with SSCs will be
captured, indexed, and stored in an
environmentally suitable and retrievable
condition. Given the volume of records
associated with the SSCs, compliance
with the records retention rule results in
a considerable cost to the licensee.
Retention of the volume of records
associated with the SSCs during the
operational phase is appropriate to serve
the underlying purpose of determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and
examining facts following an incident,
as discussed previously in this notice.
However, the cost of retaining
operational phase records beyond the
operations phase until the termination
of the license may not have been fully
considered when the records retention
rule was put in place. As such,
compliance with the record keeping
requirements would result in an undue
cost in excess of that contemplated
when the regulation was adopted.
Accordingly, special circumstances are
present which the NRC may consider,
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii), to
grant the requested exemption.
Environmental Considerations
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and
(c)(25), the granting of an exemption
from the requirements of any regulation
in Chapter I of 10 CFR is a categorical
exclusion provided that (1) there is no
significant hazards consideration; (2)
there is no significant change in the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22861
types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite; (3) there is no
significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure; (4) there is no
significant construction impact; (5)
there is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (6) the
requirements from which an exemption
is sought are among those identified in
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi).
The NRC has determined that
approval of the exemption request
involves no significant hazards
consideration because allowing the
licensee exemption from the record
keeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
at the decommissioning HBPP–3 does
not (1) involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; (2) create
the possibility of a new or different kind
of accident from any accident
previously evaluated; or (3) involve a
significant reduction in a margin of
safety (10 CFR 50.92(c)). Likewise, there
is no significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite, and no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure.
The exempted regulations are not
associated with construction, so there is
no significant construction impact. The
exempted regulations do not concern
the source term (i.e., potential amount
of radiation involved in an accident) or
accident mitigation; therefore, there is
no significant increase in the potential
for, or consequences from, radiological
accidents. Allowing the licensee partial
exemption from the record retention
requirements for which the exemption
is sought involves record keeping
requirements (10 CFR
51.22(c)(35)(vi)(A), as well as reporting
requirements (10 CFR
51.22(c)(35)(vi)(B)).
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b) and (c)(25), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared in
connection with the approval of this
exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
The NRC has determined that the
requested partial exemption from the
record keeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
will not present an undue risk to the
public health and safety. The
destruction of the identified records will
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
22862
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
not impact remaining decommissioning
activities; plant operations,
configuration, and/or radiological
effluents; or nuclear security. The NRC
has determined that the destruction of
the identified records does not involve
information or activities that could
potentially impact the common defense
and security of the United States.
The purpose for the record keeping
regulations is to assist the NRC in
carrying out its mission to protect the
public health and safety by ensuring
that the licensing and design basis of the
facility is understood, documented,
preserved and retrievable in such a way
that will aid the NRC in determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and
examining facts following an incident.
Since the HBPP–3 SSCs that were
safety-related or important to safety
during operations have been removed
from the licensing basis and removed
from the plant, the staff finds that the
records associated with the HBPP–3
licensing basis requirements previously
applicable to the nuclear power unit,
safe storage of fuel in the SFP and
associated SSCs that no longer remain
on site will no longer be required to
achieve the underlying purpose of the
records retention rule.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security, and that special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants Pacific
Gas and Electric Company a one-time
partial exemption from the record
keeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
for the Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit
3, to allow removal of records associated
with the HBPP–3 licensing basis
requirements previously applicable to
the nuclear power unit, safe storage of
fuel in the SFP and associated SSCs that
no longer remain on site.
Records associated with residual
radiological activity and with
programmatic controls necessary to
support decommissioning, such as
security, emergency planning, spent fuel
management and quality assurance are
not affected by the exemption request
and are required to be retained
consistent with existing requirements as
decommissioning records until the
termination of the HBPP–3 license.
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of May 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John R. Tappert,
Director, Division of Decommissioning,
Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2017–10071 Filed 5–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–423; NRC–2017–0118]
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.;
Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3;
Use of AXIOM Fuel Rod Cladding
Material
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a June 30,
2016, request, as supplemented by letter
dated March 27, 2017, from Dominion
Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC or the
licensee) in order to use AXIOM fuel
rod cladding material at Millstone
Power Station, Unit No. 3 (MPS–3).
DATES: The exemption was issued on
May 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2017–0118 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2017–0118. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in this document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard V. Guzman, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–1030,
email: Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. is
the holder of Renewed Facility
Operating License No. NPF–49, which
authorizes operation of MPS–3, a
pressurized-water reactor. The license
provides, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the NRC now
or hereafter in effect. Millstone Power
Station, Unit No. 3, shares the site with
Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 1, a
permanently defueled boiling water
reactor nuclear unit, and Millstone
Power Station, Unit No. 2, a
pressurized-water reactor. The facility is
located in Waterford, Connecticut,
approximately 2.3 miles southwest of
New London, Connecticut. This
exemption applies to MSP–3 only. The
other Millstone Power Station units, No.
1 and No. 2, are not covered by this
exemption.
II. Request/Action
Pursuant to § 50.12 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ the licensee
requested, by letter dated June 30, 2016
(ADAMS Accession No. ML16189A104),
as supplemented by letter dated March
27, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML17090A428), an exemption from
§ 50.46, ‘‘Acceptance criteria for
emergency core cooling systems [ECCS]
for light-water nuclear power reactors,’’
and 10 CFR part 50, appendix K, ‘‘ECCS
Evaluation Models,’’ to allow the use of
fuel rod cladding with AXIOM alloy for
future reload applications. The
regulations in § 50.46 contain
acceptance criteria for the ECCS for
reactors fueled with Zircaloy or
ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material. In
addition, 10 CFR part 50, appendix K,
requires that the Baker-Just equation be
used to predict the rates of energy
release, hydrogen concentration, and
cladding oxidation from the metal/water
reaction. The Baker-Just equation
assumes the use of a zirconium alloy,
which is a material different from
AXIOM. Therefore, the strict application
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 95 (Thursday, May 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22859-22862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10071]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-133; NRC-2017-0117]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit
3
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a
partial exemption in response to a March 9, 2017, request from the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E or the licensee). The issuance
of the exemption would grant the Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3
(HBPP-3), a partial exemption from regulations that require the
retention of records for certain systems, structures, and components.
DATES: The exemption was issued on May 10, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0117 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0117. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Hickman, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3017; email:
John.Hickman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The HBPP-3 facility is a decommissioning power reactor located in
Humboldt County, California. The PG&E is the holder of HBPP-3 Facility
Operating License No. DPR-7. On July 2, 1976, HBPP-3 was shut down for
annual refueling and to conduct seismic modifications. In 1983, updated
economic analyses indicated that restarting HBPP-3 probably would not
be cost-effective, and on June 27, 1983, PG&E announced its intention
to decommission the unit. In 1984, PG&E submitted the HBPP-3 SAFSTOR
\1\ Decommissioning Plan in support of the application to amend the
HBPP-3 operating license to a possession-only license. On July 16,
1985, the NRC issued Amendment No. 19 to the HBPP Unit 3 Operating
License (ADAMS Legacy No. 8507260040) to change the status to possess-
but-not-operate, and the plant was placed into a SAFSTOR status. On
December 11, 2008, PG&E completed the transfer of spent fuel from the
HBPP-3 spent fuel pool (SFP) into the Humboldt Bay Independent Spent
Fuel Storage Installation. PG&E then began decontamination and
dismantlement of HBPP-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``SAFSTOR'' is a method of decommissioning in which a
nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows
the facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated
(deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for
unrestricted use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Request/Action
By letter dated March 9, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17068A095),
PG&E filed a request for NRC approval of an exemption from the record
retention requirements of: (1) Part 50 of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), appendix B, Criterion XVII, which
requires certain records be retained consistent with other regulatory
requirements; (2) 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3), which requires certain records be
maintained until termination of a license issued pursuant to 10 CFR
part 50; and (3) 10 CFR 50.71(c), which requires certain records be
maintained
[[Page 22860]]
consistent with various elements of the NRC's regulations, facility
technical specifications, and other licensing basis documents.
The PG&E proposed to eliminate these records for the nuclear power
unit and associated systems, structures, and components (SSCs) that no
longer exist, including SSCs that were associated with the
decommissioning and storage of spent fuel under the 10 CFR part 50
license for HBPP-3. The licensee cites record retention exemptions
granted to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15355A055), LaCrosse Boiling Water Reactor
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15355A103), Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15344A243), and Zion Nuclear Power Station,
Units 1 and 2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML111260266), as examples of the NRC
granting similar requests.
Records associated with residual radiological activity and with
programmatic controls necessary to support decommissioning, such as
security and quality assurance, are not affected by the exemption
request, and would be retained as decommissioning records until the
termination of the HBPP-3 license. In addition, the licensee did not
request an exemption from 10 CFR part 50, appendix A, Criterion 1,
which requires certain records to be maintained ``throughout the life
of the unit,'' because HBPP-3 is not a general design criteria
facility. Nor did PG&E request an exemption associated with any record
keeping requirements for storage of spent fuel at the HBPP-3 ISFSI
under 10 CFR part 72, or for the other requirements of 10 CFR part 50
or Facility Operating License No. DPR-7 applicable to the
decommissioning and dismantlement of the HBPP-3 plant.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when the exemptions are authorized
by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or safety, and
are consistent with the common defense and security. However, the
Commission will not consider granting an exemption unless special
circumstances are present. Special circumstances are described in 10
CFR 50.12(a)(2).
The March 9, 2017, exemption application states that the HBPP-3 is
in an advanced state of decommissioning and that there are no HBPP-3
SSCs remaining at the site.
With all the SSCs removed from the site the need for the associated
records is eliminated. Therefore, the licensee proposed that it be
exempted from the records retention requirements for SSCs and
historical activities associated with the HBPP-3 licensing basis
requirements previously applicable to the nuclear power unit and
storage of fuel in the SFP. The associated licensing bases are no
longer effective, thereby eliminating the associated regulatory and
economic burdens of creating alternative records storage locations,
relocating records, and retaining irrelevant records.
The licensee states that the radiological and other necessary
programmatic controls (such as security and quality assurance) for the
facility and decommissioning activities are and will continue to be
appropriately addressed through the license and current plant documents
such as the updated Final Safety Analysis Report and Technical
Specifications. These programmatic elements and their associated
records would be unaffected by the requested exemption.
The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
The NRC has determined that granting the licensee's proposed
exemption will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, other laws, or Commission regulations. Therefore, the
exemption from the record keeping requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10
CFR part 50, appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) is
authorized by law.
The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
Removal of the records for which PG&E has requested an exemption
from record keeping requirements will not have an adverse public health
and safety impact because the SSCs have been removed from the site.
Elimination of records associated with the removed SSCs, therefore,
would not present an undue risk to public health and safety.
The requested partial exemption from the record keeping
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B, Criterion
XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) for records associated with the HBPP-3
licensing basis requirements previously applicable to the nuclear power
unit and associated systems, including SSCs that are no longer on site
or part of the licensing basis, is administrative in nature and will
have no impact on any remaining decommissioning activities or on
radiological effluents. The exemption will only advance the schedule
for disposition of the specified records, which would otherwise be
retained until license termination and require the unnecessary
expenditure of resources by the licensee.
The Exemption Is Consistent With Common Defense and Security
The elimination of the record keeping requirements does not involve
information or activities that could potentially impact the common
defense and security of the United States. Upon dismantlement of the
affected SSCs, the records have no functional purpose relative to
maintaining the safe operation of the SSCs, maintaining conditions that
would affect the ongoing health and safety of workers or the public, or
informing decisions related to nuclear security.
Rather, the exemption requested is administrative in nature and
would only advance the current schedule for disposition of the
specified records, which would otherwise be retained until license
termination. This allows the licensee to not expend resources
maintaining records that have no benefit or security purpose.
Therefore, the partial exemption from the record keeping requirements
of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10
CFR 50.59(d)(3) for the types of records associated with the HBPP-3
licensing basis requirements previously applicable to the nuclear power
unit, and safe storage of fuel in the SFP and associated SSCs that no
longer remain on site, is consistent with the common defense and
security.
Special Circumstances
Section 50.12(a)(2) requires that special circumstances be present
for the Commission to consider granting an exemption. Special
circumstances include application of the regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is
not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule, and
compliance with the regulation would result in undue hardship or other
costs that are significantly in excess of those contemplated when the
regulation was adopted.
Criterion XVII of 10 CFR part 50, appendix B, requires that
sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of
activities affecting quality.
Section 50.59(d)(3) requires that the records of changes in the
facility must be maintained until the termination of an operating
license.
Section 50.71(c), mandates that records that are required by the
regulations in part 50, by license condition, or by technical
specifications
[[Page 22861]]
must be retained for the period specified by the appropriate
regulation, license condition, or technical specification.
Additionally, if a retention period is not otherwise specified, these
records must be retained until the Commission terminates the facility
license.
In the Statement of Considerations (SOC) for the final rulemaking,
``Retention Periods for Records'' (53 FR 19240; May 27, 1988), the NRC
stated that records must be retained for the NRC to ensure compliance
with the safety and health aspects of the nuclear environment and for
the NRC to accomplish its mission to protect the public health and
safety. Also in the SOC, the Commission explained that requiring
licensees to maintain adequate records assists the NRC in judging
compliance and noncompliance, to act on possible noncompliance, and to
examine facts as necessary following any incident.
These regulations apply to licensees in decommissioning despite the
fact that, during the decommissioning process, safety-related SSCs are
retired or disabled and subsequently removed from NRC licensing basis
documents by appropriate change mechanisms. Appropriate removal of an
SSC from the licensing basis requires either a determination by the
licensee or an approval from the NRC that the SSC no longer has the
potential to cause an accident, event, or other problem, which would
adversely impact public health and safety.
The records subject to removal under the requested exemption are
those associated with SSCs that had been important to safety during
power operation or operation of the SFP, but are no longer capable of
causing an event, incident, or condition that would adversely impact
public health and safety, given their appropriate removal from the
licensing basis documents. If the SSCs no longer have the potential to
cause these scenarios, then certain records associated with these SSCs
would not be necessary to assist the NRC in determining compliance and
noncompliance, taking action on possible noncompliance, and examining
facts following an incident. Therefore, their retention would not serve
the underlying purpose of the rule.
Retention of certain records associated with SSCs that are or will
no longer be part of the facility serves no safety or regulatory
purpose, nor does it serve the underlying purpose of the rule of
maintaining compliance with the safety and health aspects of the
nuclear environment in order to accomplish the NRC's mission.
Accordingly, special circumstances are present which the NRC may
consider, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), to grant the requested
exemption permitting the disposal of records associated with the HBPP-3
licensing basis requirements previously applicable to the nuclear power
unit, safe storage of fuel in the SFP, and associated SSCs that no
longer remain on site.
Records that continue to serve the underlying purpose of the rule,
that is, to maintain compliance and to protect public health and safety
in support of the NRC's mission, will continue to be retained pursuant
to the regulations in 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72. The retained
records not subject to the exemption include those associated with
programmatic controls, such as those pertaining to residual
radioactivity, which continue to be required for decommissioning;
security, emergency planning and quality assurance programs which
remain in effect; as well as records associated with the Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation and spent fuel assemblies.
The retention of records required by 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part
50, appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) provides
assurance that records associated with SSCs will be captured, indexed,
and stored in an environmentally suitable and retrievable condition.
Given the volume of records associated with the SSCs, compliance with
the records retention rule results in a considerable cost to the
licensee. Retention of the volume of records associated with the SSCs
during the operational phase is appropriate to serve the underlying
purpose of determining compliance and noncompliance, taking action on
possible noncompliance, and examining facts following an incident, as
discussed previously in this notice.
However, the cost of retaining operational phase records beyond the
operations phase until the termination of the license may not have been
fully considered when the records retention rule was put in place. As
such, compliance with the record keeping requirements would result in
an undue cost in excess of that contemplated when the regulation was
adopted. Accordingly, special circumstances are present which the NRC
may consider, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii), to grant the
requested exemption.
Environmental Considerations
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and (c)(25), the granting of an
exemption from the requirements of any regulation in Chapter I of 10
CFR is a categorical exclusion provided that (1) there is no
significant hazards consideration; (2) there is no significant change
in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents
that may be released offsite; (3) there is no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure; (4)
there is no significant construction impact; (5) there is no
significant increase in the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (6) the requirements from which an
exemption is sought are among those identified in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi).
The NRC has determined that approval of the exemption request
involves no significant hazards consideration because allowing the
licensee exemption from the record keeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) at the decommissioning HBPP-3 does not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; (2) create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve
a significant reduction in a margin of safety (10 CFR 50.92(c)).
Likewise, there is no significant change in the types or significant
increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite,
and no significant increase in individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure.
The exempted regulations are not associated with construction, so
there is no significant construction impact. The exempted regulations
do not concern the source term (i.e., potential amount of radiation
involved in an accident) or accident mitigation; therefore, there is no
significant increase in the potential for, or consequences from,
radiological accidents. Allowing the licensee partial exemption from
the record retention requirements for which the exemption is sought
involves record keeping requirements (10 CFR 51.22(c)(35)(vi)(A), as
well as reporting requirements (10 CFR 51.22(c)(35)(vi)(B)).
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and (c)(25), no
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with the approval of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
The NRC has determined that the requested partial exemption from
the record keeping requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50,
appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) will not present an
undue risk to the public health and safety. The destruction of the
identified records will
[[Page 22862]]
not impact remaining decommissioning activities; plant operations,
configuration, and/or radiological effluents; or nuclear security. The
NRC has determined that the destruction of the identified records does
not involve information or activities that could potentially impact the
common defense and security of the United States.
The purpose for the record keeping regulations is to assist the NRC
in carrying out its mission to protect the public health and safety by
ensuring that the licensing and design basis of the facility is
understood, documented, preserved and retrievable in such a way that
will aid the NRC in determining compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and examining facts following an
incident. Since the HBPP-3 SSCs that were safety-related or important
to safety during operations have been removed from the licensing basis
and removed from the plant, the staff finds that the records associated
with the HBPP-3 licensing basis requirements previously applicable to
the nuclear power unit, safe storage of fuel in the SFP and associated
SSCs that no longer remain on site will no longer be required to
achieve the underlying purpose of the records retention rule.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common
defense and security, and that special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Pacific Gas and Electric
Company a one-time partial exemption from the record keeping
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, appendix B, Criterion
XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) for the Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3,
to allow removal of records associated with the HBPP-3 licensing basis
requirements previously applicable to the nuclear power unit, safe
storage of fuel in the SFP and associated SSCs that no longer remain on
site.
Records associated with residual radiological activity and with
programmatic controls necessary to support decommissioning, such as
security, emergency planning, spent fuel management and quality
assurance are not affected by the exemption request and are required to
be retained consistent with existing requirements as decommissioning
records until the termination of the HBPP-3 license.
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of May 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John R. Tappert,
Director, Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste
Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2017-10071 Filed 5-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P