Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace, Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 Airplanes; Limit Engine Torque Loads, 22065-22066 [2017-09663]
Download as PDF
22065
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 91
Friday, May 12, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0033; Special
Conditions No. 25–670–SC]
Special Conditions: Bombardier
Aerospace, Model BD–700–2A12 and
BD–700–2A13 Airplanes; Limit Engine
Torque Loads
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Bombardier (Bombardier)
Inc. Models BD–700–2A12 and BD–
700–2A13 airplanes. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design feature
when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transportcategory airplanes. This design feature
is the engine torque-load limit imposed
by sudden engine stoppage due to
malfunction or structural failure. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Bombardier on May 12, 2017. Send your
comments on or before June 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2017–0033
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 May 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478).
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Freisthler, FAA, Airframe and
Cabin Safety Branch, ANM–115,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1119; facsimile
425–227–1232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
substance of these special conditions
has been subject to the public notice
and comment period in several prior
instances, and has been derived without
substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, the FAA
has determined that prior public notice
and comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon
issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
opportunities for comment described
above. It is further unnecessary to delay
the effective date for the reasons
previously stated.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On May 30, 2012, Bombardier applied
for an amendment to Type Certificate
No. T00003NY to include the new
Model BD–700–2A12 and BD–700–
2A13 airplanes. These airplanes are
derivatives of the Model BD–700 series
of airplanes and are marketed as the
Bombardier Global 7000 (Model BD–
700–2A12) and Global 8000 (Model BD–
700–2A13). These airplanes are twinengine, transport-category, executiveinterior business jets. The maximum
passenger capacity is 19 and the
maximum takeoff weights are 106,250
lbs. (Model BD–700–2A12) and 104,800
lbs. (Model BD–700–2A13).
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.101,
Bombardier must show that the Model
BD–700–2A12 and BD–700–2A13
airplanes meet the applicable provisions
of the regulations listed in Type
Certificate No. T00003NY, or the
applicable regulations in effect on the
date of application for the change,
except for earlier amendments as agreed
upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model BD–700–2A12 and BD–
700–2A13 airplanes because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
22066
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 91 / Friday, May 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other
model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model BD–700–2A12
and BD–700–2A13 airplanes must
comply with the fuel-vent and exhaustemission requirements of 14 CFR part
34, and the noise-certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Feature
The Bombardier Model BD–700–2A12
and BD–700–2A13 airplanes will
incorporate a novel or unusual design
feature associated with engine-seizure
requirements due, in part, to large
bypass fans capable of producing much
larger and more complex dynamic loads
than would other bypass fans.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
BD–700–2A12 and BD–700–2A13
airplanes. Should Bombardier apply at a
later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would apply to the other model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only one novel or
unusual design feature on Bombardier
Model BD–700–2A12 and BD–700–
2A13 airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to FAA for
approval of this feature on the airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
■
Discussion
The limit engine torque load imposed
by sudden engine stoppage due to
malfunction or structural failure (such
as compressor jamming) has been a
specific requirement for transportcategory airplanes since 1957. In the
past, the design torque loads associated
with typical failure scenarios have been
estimated by the engine manufacturer
and provided to the airframe
manufacturer as limit loads. These limit
loads were considered simple, pure,
torque static loads.
It is evident from service history that
the engine-failure events that tend to
cause the most severe loads are fanblade failures. These events occur much
less frequently than the typical ‘‘limit’’
load condition.
Regulatory authorities and industry
have developed a standardized
requirement in the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) forum
(Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee; Loads and Dynamics
Harmonization Working Group [58 FR
13819]). The technical aspects of this
requirement have been agreed upon,
and the ARAC Loads and Dynamics
Harmonization Working Group has
accepted them. These special conditions
reflect the ARAC recommendation. The
ARAC recommendation includes
corresponding advisory material, which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
is considered an acceptable means of
compliance to these special conditions.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
16:29 May 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type certification
basis for Bombardier Model BD–700–
2A12 and BD–700–2A13 airplanes.
In lieu of § 25.361(b) the following
special conditions apply:
1. For turbine engine installations, the
engine mounts, pylons, and adjacent
supporting airframe structure must be
designed to withstand 1g level flight
loads acting simultaneously with the
maximum limit torque loads imposed
by each of the following:
a. Sudden engine deceleration due to
a malfunction that could result in a
temporary loss of power or thrust, and
b. The maximum acceleration of the
engine.
2. For auxiliary power unit (APU)
installations, the power unit mounts
and adjacent supporting airframe
structure must be designed to withstand
1g level flight loads acting
simultaneously with the maximum limit
torque loads imposed by each of the
following:
a. Sudden APU deceleration due to
malfunction or structural failure; and
■
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
b. The maximum acceleration of the
APU.
3. For engine supporting structure, an
ultimate loading condition must be
considered that combines 1g flight loads
with the transient dynamic loads
resulting from:
a. The loss of any fan, compressor, or
turbine blade; and separately
b. Where applicable to a specific
engine design, any other engine
structural failure that results in higher
loads.
4. The ultimate loads developed from
the conditions specified in paragraphs
3(a) and 3(b) of these special conditions
are to be multiplied by a factor of 1.0
when applied to engine mounts and
pylons, and multiplied by a factor of
1.25 when applied to adjacent
supporting airframe structure.
5. Any permanent deformation that
results from the conditions specified in
paragraph 3 must not prevent continued
safe flight and landing.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 27,
2017.
Paul Bernado,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–09663 Filed 5–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0358; Special
Conditions No. 25–659–SC]
Special Conditions: Bombardier
Aerospace Inc., Model BD–100–1A10
Airplane; Non-Rechargeable Lithium
Battery Installations
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for non-rechargeable lithium
battery installations on the Bombardier
Aerospace Inc. (Bombardier) Model BD–
100–1A10 airplane. Non-rechargeable
lithium batteries are a novel or unusual
design feature when compared to the
state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport
category airplanes. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22065-22066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09663]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 91 / Friday, May 12, 2017 / Rules and
Regulations
[[Page 22065]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0033; Special Conditions No. 25-670-SC]
Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace, Model BD-700-2A12 and
BD-700-2A13 Airplanes; Limit Engine Torque Loads
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Bombardier
(Bombardier) Inc. Models BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 airplanes. This
airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to
the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for
transport-category airplanes. This design feature is the engine torque-
load limit imposed by sudden engine stoppage due to malfunction or
structural failure. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on Bombardier on May 12, 2017. Send
your comments on or before June 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2017-0033
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478).
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Freisthler, FAA, Airframe and
Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1119; facsimile 425-227-1232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The substance of these special conditions
has been subject to the public notice and comment period in several
prior instances, and has been derived without substantive change from
those previously issued. It is unlikely that prior public comment would
result in a significant change from the substance contained herein.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting
these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments
to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above. It is further unnecessary to delay the effective date for the
reasons previously stated.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.
Background
On May 30, 2012, Bombardier applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. T00003NY to include the new Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-
700-2A13 airplanes. These airplanes are derivatives of the Model BD-700
series of airplanes and are marketed as the Bombardier Global 7000
(Model BD-700-2A12) and Global 8000 (Model BD-700-2A13). These
airplanes are twin-engine, transport-category, executive-interior
business jets. The maximum passenger capacity is 19 and the maximum
takeoff weights are 106,250 lbs. (Model BD-700-2A12) and 104,800 lbs.
(Model BD-700-2A13).
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.101, Bombardier must show that the Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-
700-2A13 airplanes meet the applicable provisions of the regulations
listed in Type Certificate No. T00003NY, or the applicable regulations
in effect on the date of application for the change, except for earlier
amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13
airplanes because of a novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to
[[Page 22066]]
include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions would also apply to the other
model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 airplanes must comply
with the fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34,
and the noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Feature
The Bombardier Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 airplanes will
incorporate a novel or unusual design feature associated with engine-
seizure requirements due, in part, to large bypass fans capable of
producing much larger and more complex dynamic loads than would other
bypass fans.
Discussion
The limit engine torque load imposed by sudden engine stoppage due
to malfunction or structural failure (such as compressor jamming) has
been a specific requirement for transport-category airplanes since
1957. In the past, the design torque loads associated with typical
failure scenarios have been estimated by the engine manufacturer and
provided to the airframe manufacturer as limit loads. These limit loads
were considered simple, pure, torque static loads.
It is evident from service history that the engine-failure events
that tend to cause the most severe loads are fan-blade failures. These
events occur much less frequently than the typical ``limit'' load
condition.
Regulatory authorities and industry have developed a standardized
requirement in the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) forum
(Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Loads and Dynamics
Harmonization Working Group [58 FR 13819]). The technical aspects of
this requirement have been agreed upon, and the ARAC Loads and Dynamics
Harmonization Working Group has accepted them. These special conditions
reflect the ARAC recommendation. The ARAC recommendation includes
corresponding advisory material, which is considered an acceptable
means of compliance to these special conditions.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 airplanes. Should Bombardier apply at
a later date for a change to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to the other model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only one novel or unusual design feature on
Bombardier Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 airplanes. It is not a
rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant who
applied to FAA for approval of this feature on the airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Bombardier Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-
700-2A13 airplanes.
In lieu of Sec. 25.361(b) the following special conditions apply:
1. For turbine engine installations, the engine mounts, pylons, and
adjacent supporting airframe structure must be designed to withstand 1g
level flight loads acting simultaneously with the maximum limit torque
loads imposed by each of the following:
a. Sudden engine deceleration due to a malfunction that could
result in a temporary loss of power or thrust, and
b. The maximum acceleration of the engine.
2. For auxiliary power unit (APU) installations, the power unit
mounts and adjacent supporting airframe structure must be designed to
withstand 1g level flight loads acting simultaneously with the maximum
limit torque loads imposed by each of the following:
a. Sudden APU deceleration due to malfunction or structural
failure; and
b. The maximum acceleration of the APU.
3. For engine supporting structure, an ultimate loading condition
must be considered that combines 1g flight loads with the transient
dynamic loads resulting from:
a. The loss of any fan, compressor, or turbine blade; and
separately
b. Where applicable to a specific engine design, any other engine
structural failure that results in higher loads.
4. The ultimate loads developed from the conditions specified in
paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) of these special conditions are to be
multiplied by a factor of 1.0 when applied to engine mounts and pylons,
and multiplied by a factor of 1.25 when applied to adjacent supporting
airframe structure.
5. Any permanent deformation that results from the conditions
specified in paragraph 3 must not prevent continued safe flight and
landing.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 27, 2017.
Paul Bernado,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-09663 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P