Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request, 22006-22008 [2017-09581]
Download as PDF
22006
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 90 / Thursday, May 11, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
by the petitioner, Stecker et al. [2014],
does not meet the policy’s relevance
requirement of being an epidemiologic
study of a 9/11-exposed population,
because it was an in vitro study
conducted in rat tissues; 14 therefore, it
was not further considered. The
Program also identified a study by
Marmor et al. [2017] 15 which reported
on the prevalence and risk factors for
paresthesia, a condition related to and at
times a symptom of neuropathy, among
community members who attended the
WTC Environmental Health Center for
treatment of health outcomes resulting
from 9/11 exposures. Since the Marmor
et al. [2017] study concerns paresthesia
rather than neuropathy, it is not
considered ‘‘relevant’’ and, per Program
policy,16 cannot provide potential
support for deciding whether to propose
adding neuropathy to the List.17
The Wilkenfeld et al. study was
previously reviewed for quality as part
of the Program’s evaluation of Petition
010, which requested the addition of
peripheral neuropathy to the List. As
discussed in the Federal Register notice
regarding Petition 010, the Wilkenfeld et
al. [2016] study was found to have
numerous limitations preventing further
evaluation.18
Upon review, the Stecker et al. [2016]
study also exhibited significant
limitations, including flawed study
design and selection bias. Similar to the
study by Wilkenfeld et al. [2016], the
Stecker et al. [2016] study was crosssectional and did not include
appropriate population sampling
criteria. Although Stecker et al. [2016]
used an objective measure of
neuropathy, the comparison group was
inadequate. The small exposure group
and multiple statistical tests may have
limited the study power. Neither the
Wilkenfeld et al. [2016] nor the Stecker
et al. [2016] study addressed potential
exposures to toxins outside of 9/11
exposures and other confounders that
could explain the findings.
14 Only epidemiologic studies of the health
condition in human 9/11-exposed populations are
considered relevant.
15 Marmor M, Shao Y, Bhatt DH, et al. [2017],
Paresthesias among Community Members Exposed
to the World Trade Center Disaster, JOEM article in
press.
16 See supra note 3 and Section A.
17 Paresthesia refers to abnormal sensations such
as prickling, tingling, itching, burning or cold, skin
crawling or impaired sensations. Although
paresthesia symptoms could arise from nerve
damage, including neuropathy, other conditions
can also produce paresthesia, such as anxiety,
metabolic derangements, and certain infectious
diseases such as Lyme disease. Because paresthesia
is not exclusively associated with neuropathy,
paresthesia is not a proxy for neuropathy.
18 See 81 FR 19108 (April 4, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 May 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
The studies by Wilkenfeld et al.
[2016] and Stecker et al. [2016]
exhibited many significant limitations
and were found, individually and
together, not to provide a basis for
deciding whether to propose adding
neuropathy to the List.
D. Administrator’s Final Decision on
Whether To Propose the Addition of
Neuropathy to the List
In accordance with the review and
determination discussed above, the
Administrator has concluded that the
available evidence does not have the
potential to provide a basis for a
decision on whether to add neuropathy
to the List. Accordingly, the
Administrator has determined that
insufficient evidence is available to take
further action at this time, including
either proposing the addition of
neuropathy to the List (pursuant to PHS
Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(ii) and 42 CFR
88.16(a)(2)(ii)) or publishing a
determination not to publish a proposed
rule in the Federal Register (pursuant to
PHS Act, sec. 3312(a)(6)(B)(iii) and 42
CFR 88.16(a)(2)(iii)). The Administrator
has also determined that requesting a
recommendation from the STAC
(pursuant to PHS Act, sec.
3312(a)(6)(B)(i) and 42 CFR
88.16(a)(2)(i)) is unwarranted.
For the reasons discussed above, the
Petition 015 request to add neuropathy
to the List of WTC-Related Health
Conditions is denied.
E. Approval To Submit Document to the
Office of the Federal Register
The Secretary, HHS, or his designee,
the Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) and
Administrator, Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), authorized the undersigned,
the Administrator of the WTC Health
Program, to sign and submit the
document to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication as an official
document of the WTC Health Program.
Anne Schuchat, M.D., Acting Director,
CDC, and Acting Administrator,
ATSDR, approved this document for
publication on May 2, 2017.
John Howard,
Administrator, World Trade Center Health
Program and Director, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Department
of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–09551 Filed 5–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects: Reinstate and
Extend Collection with Modification—
Social Services Block Grant (SSBG)
Post-Expenditure Report.
Title: Social Services Block Grant
(SSBG) Post-Expenditure Report.
OMB No.: 0970–0234.
Description: The purpose of this is to
request approval to: (1) Reinstate and
extend the collection of postexpenditure data using the current OMB
approved Post-Expenditure Reporting
form (OMB No. 0970–0234) with
modification past the current expiration
date of November 30, 2017; (2) propose
8 minor additions to the current PostExpenditure Reporting form; and (3) to
request that grantees continue to
voluntarily submit estimated preexpenditure data using the PostExpenditure Reporting form, as part of
the required annual Intended Use Plan.
The Social Services Block Grant
(SSBG) is authorized under Title XX of
the Social Security Act, as amended,
and is codified at 42 U.S.C. 1397
through 1397e. SSBG provides funds to
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the
Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands
(hereinafter referred to as States and
Territories or grantees) to assist in
delivering critical services to vulnerable
older adults, persons with disabilities,
at-risk adolescents and young adults,
and children and families. SSBG funds
are distributed to each State and the
District of Columbia based on each
State’s population relative to all other
States. Distributions are made to Puerto
Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the
Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands based
on the same ratio allotted to them in
1981 as compared to the total 1981
appropriation.
Each State or Territory is responsible
for designing and implementing its own
use of SSBG funds to meet the
specialized needs of their most
vulnerable populations. States and
Territories may determine what services
will be provided, who will be eligible,
and how funds will be distributed
among the various services. State or
local SSBG agencies (i.e., county, city,
regional offices) may provide the
services or grantees may purchase
services from qualified agencies,
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 90 / Thursday, May 11, 2017 / Notices
organizations, or individuals. States and
Territories must administer the SSBG
according to their accepted Intended
Use Plan, along with amendments, and
in conformance with their own
implementing rules and policies. The
Office of Community Services (OCS),
Administration for Children and
Families administers the SSBG.
Annually, grantees are required to
submit a Pre-Expenditure Report and
Intended Use Plan as a prerequisite to
receiving SSBG funds. The PreExpenditure Report must include
information on the types of services to
be supported and the characteristics of
individuals to be served. This report is
to be submitted 30 days prior to the start
of the Fiscal Year (June 1 if the State
operates on a July–June Fiscal Year, or
September 1 if the State operates on a
Federal Fiscal Year). No specific format
is required for the Intended Use Plan.
Grantees are required to submit a
revised Intended Use Plan and PreExpenditure Report if the planned use
of SSBG funds changes during the year
(42 U.S.C. 1397c).
In order to provide a more accurate
analysis of the extent to which funds are
spent ‘‘in a manner consistent’’ with
each of the grantees’ plan for their use,
as required by 42 U.S.C. 1397e (a), OCS
continues to request that States
voluntarily use the format of the PostExpenditure Reporting form to create
their Pre-Expenditure Report, which
provides estimates of the amount of
expenditures and the number of
recipients, by service category, and is
submitted as part of the grantees’
Intended Use Plan. Most of the States
and Territories are currently using the
format of the Post-Expenditure
Reporting form to report estimated
expenditures and recipients (the PreExpenditure Report), by service
category, as part of their Intended Use
Plan.
On an annual basis, States and
Territories are also required to submit a
Post-Expenditure Report that details
their use of SSBG funds in each of 29
service categories. Grantees are required
to submit their Post-Expenditure Report
within six months of the end of the
period covered by the report. The PostExpenditure Report must address (1)
The number of individuals (including
number of children and number of
adults) who receive services paid for, in
whole or in part, with Federal funds
under the SSBG; (2) The amount of
SSBG funds spent in providing each
service; (3) The total amount of Federal,
State, and Local funds spent in
providing each service, including SSBG
funds; (4) The method(s) by which each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 May 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
service is provided, showing separately
the services provided by public and
private agencies; and (5) The criteria
applied in determining eligibility for
each service such as income eligibility
guidelines, sliding scale fees, the effect
of public assistance benefits, and any
requirements for enrollment in school or
training programs (45 CFR 96.74a). The
Post-Expenditure Report must also; (1)
Indicate if recipient totals are actual or
if the total reported is based on
estimates and/or sampled data; and (2)
use its own definition of child and adult
in reporting the required data (45 CFR
96.74b).
This request seeks approval to
reinstate and continue the use of the
current OMB approved PostExpenditure Reporting form (OMB No.
0970–0234) with modification, for
estimating expenditures and recipients
as part of States’/Territories’ PreExpenditure Reports and for annual
Post-Expenditure Reporting. The
proposed modifications seek to
consolidate information that would be
stored or transmitted elsewhere into the
singular reporting form to allow OCS to
better analyze and provide guidance to
improve States efficiency in grant
administration. These modifications
address the regulations 42 U.S.C. 1397e
and 45 CFR 96.74 cited above by
providing space on the PostExpenditure form to indicate the
required information.
Beginning in 2013, States completed
the current reporting form on the SSBG
Portal. The SSBG Portal is a secure webbased data portal. The SSBG Portal
allows for more efficient data
submission without increasing the
overall burden on States. Until recently,
Territories reported the data on the PostExpenditure Reporting form in
Microsoft Excel and submitted it to
ACF, via email or posted mail. In 2017,
Territories can complete the current
reporting form on the SSBG Portal. The
SSBG Portal provides a user-friendly
means for States and Territories to
submit and access their Pre-Expenditure
and Post-Expenditure and Recipient
Data.
Information collected in the PostExpenditure Reports submitted by
States and Territories is analyzed and
described in an annual report on SSBG
expenditures and recipients produced
by the Office of Community Services
(OCS), Administration for Children and
Families (ACF). The information
contained in this report is used for grant
planning and management. The data
establishes how SSBG funding is used
for the provision of services in each
State or Territory.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22007
The data is also analyzed to determine
the performance of States and
Territories in meeting the SSBG
performance measures developed to
meet the requirements of the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 (GPRA), as amended by the
GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 [Pub.
L. 11–352; 31 U.S.C 1115(b)(10)]. GPRA
requires all Federal agencies to develop
measurable performance goals.
The SSBG currently has an
administrative costs efficiency measure
which is intended to decrease the
percentage of SSBG funds identified as
administrative costs in the PostExpenditure Reports [U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Community Services.
(2007, June). Implementing a new
performance measure to enhance
efficiency (Information Memorandum
Transmittal No. 04–2007). Available
from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ocs/
resource/implementing-a-newperformance-measure-to-enhanceefficiency]. The SSBG also implements
a performance measure designed to
ensure that SSBG funds are spent
effectively and efficiently while
maintaining the intrinsic flexibility of
the SSBG as a block grant. The
performance measure assesses the
degree to which States and Territories
spend SSBG funds in a manner
consistent with their intended use, as
required by Federal law [42 U.S.C.
1397e(a); U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Community Services. (2012, February).
Implementation of a new performance
measure (Information Memorandum
Transmittal No. 01–2012). Available
from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ocs/
resource/implementation-of-a-newperformance-measure]. It will be used to
determine how well grantees are doing
overall in minimizing variance between
projected and actual expenditures of
SSBG funds. This program measure
began implementation with FY 2013
data and remains ongoing.
Respondents: The Post-Expenditure
Reporting form and Pre-Expenditure
Report are completed once annually by
a representative of the agency that
administers the Social Services Block
Grant at the State or Territory level.
Respondents include the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, as
well as the territories of American
Samoa, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and
the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana
Islands.
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
22008
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 90 / Thursday, May 11, 2017 / Notices
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Post-Expenditure Reporting Form ...................................................................
Use of Post-Expenditure Reporting Form as Part of the Intended Use Plan
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 6,272.
In compliance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chap 35), the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW.,
Washington DC 20201. Attn: ACF
Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–09581 Filed 5–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–24–P
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Request for Nominations to the
Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s
Research, Care, and Services
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation,
Department of Health and Human
Services.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 May 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
56
56
The Secretary of HHS
established the Advisory Council to
provide advice and consultation to the
Secretary on how to prevent or reduce
the burden of Alzheimer’s disease and
related dementias on people with the
disease and their caregivers. The
Secretary signed the charter establishing
the Advisory Council on May 23, 2011.
HHS is soliciting nominations for seven
(7) new non-Federal members of the
Advisory Council to replace the seven
members whose terms will end
September 30th, 2017. Nominations
should include the nominee’s contact
information (current mailing address,
email address, and telephone number)
and current curriculum vitae or resume.
DATES: Submit nominations by email or
USPS mail before COB on June 16, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent
by email to Rohini Khillan at
rohini.khillan@hhs.gov; or sent by USPS
mail to: Rohini Khillan, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation, Room 424E, Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rohini Khillan (202) 690–5932,
rohini.khillan@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s
Research, Care, and Services meets
quarterly to discuss programs that
impact people with Alzheimer’s disease
and related dementias and their
caregivers. The Advisory Council makes
recommendations to Congress and the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
about ways to reduce the financial
impact of Alzheimer’s disease and
related dementias and to improve the
health outcomes of people with these
conditions. The Advisory Council also
provides feedback on a National Plan for
Alzheimer’s disease. On an annual
basis, the Advisory Council evaluates
the implementation of the
recommendations through an updated
National Plan. The National Alzheimer’s
Project Act, Public Law 111–375 (42
U.S.C. 11225), requires that the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
(HHS) establish the Advisory Council
on Alzheimer’s Research, Care, and
Services. The Advisory Council is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
1
1
Average
burden hours
per
response
110
2
Total burden
ours
6,160
112
governed by provisions of Public Law
92–463 (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), which
sets forth standards for the formation
and use of advisory committees.
The Advisory Council consists of 22
members. Ten members will be
designees from Federal agencies
including the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Administration
for Community Living, Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, Indian
Health Service, National Institutes of
Health, National Science Foundation,
Department of Veterans Affairs, Food
and Drug Administration, Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, and
the Health Resources and Services
Administration.
The Advisory Council also consists of
12 non-federal members selected by the
Secretary who fall into 6 categories:
Dementia caregivers (2), health care
providers (2), representatives of State
health departments (2), researchers with
dementia-related expertise in basic,
translational, clinical, or drug
development science (2), voluntary
health association representatives (2),
and dementia patient advocates,
including an advocate who is currently
living with the disease (2). The member
living with the disease serves a 2-year
term.
At this time, the Secretary shall
appoint one member for each category,
to replace the seven members whose
terms will end on September 30th, 2017,
for a total of seven (7) new members to
the Council. After receiving
nominations, the Secretary, with input
from his staff, will make the final
decision, and the new members will be
announced soon after. Members shall be
invited to serve 4-year terms, except that
any member appointed to fill a vacancy
for an unexpired term shall be
appointed for the remainder of such
term. The member living with the
disease will serve a 2-year term. A
member may serve after the expiration
of the member’s term until a successor
has taken office. Members will serve as
Special Government Employees.
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 90 (Thursday, May 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22006-22008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09581]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects: Reinstate and Extend Collection with
Modification--Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) Post-Expenditure
Report.
Title: Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) Post-Expenditure Report.
OMB No.: 0970-0234.
Description: The purpose of this is to request approval to: (1)
Reinstate and extend the collection of post-expenditure data using the
current OMB approved Post-Expenditure Reporting form (OMB No. 0970-
0234) with modification past the current expiration date of November
30, 2017; (2) propose 8 minor additions to the current Post-Expenditure
Reporting form; and (3) to request that grantees continue to
voluntarily submit estimated pre-expenditure data using the Post-
Expenditure Reporting form, as part of the required annual Intended Use
Plan.
The Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) is authorized under Title XX
of the Social Security Act, as amended, and is codified at 42 U.S.C.
1397 through 1397e. SSBG provides funds to States, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (hereinafter referred
to as States and Territories or grantees) to assist in delivering
critical services to vulnerable older adults, persons with
disabilities, at-risk adolescents and young adults, and children and
families. SSBG funds are distributed to each State and the District of
Columbia based on each State's population relative to all other States.
Distributions are made to Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin
Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands based on
the same ratio allotted to them in 1981 as compared to the total 1981
appropriation.
Each State or Territory is responsible for designing and
implementing its own use of SSBG funds to meet the specialized needs of
their most vulnerable populations. States and Territories may determine
what services will be provided, who will be eligible, and how funds
will be distributed among the various services. State or local SSBG
agencies (i.e., county, city, regional offices) may provide the
services or grantees may purchase services from qualified agencies,
[[Page 22007]]
organizations, or individuals. States and Territories must administer
the SSBG according to their accepted Intended Use Plan, along with
amendments, and in conformance with their own implementing rules and
policies. The Office of Community Services (OCS), Administration for
Children and Families administers the SSBG.
Annually, grantees are required to submit a Pre-Expenditure Report
and Intended Use Plan as a prerequisite to receiving SSBG funds. The
Pre-Expenditure Report must include information on the types of
services to be supported and the characteristics of individuals to be
served. This report is to be submitted 30 days prior to the start of
the Fiscal Year (June 1 if the State operates on a July-June Fiscal
Year, or September 1 if the State operates on a Federal Fiscal Year).
No specific format is required for the Intended Use Plan. Grantees are
required to submit a revised Intended Use Plan and Pre-Expenditure
Report if the planned use of SSBG funds changes during the year (42
U.S.C. 1397c).
In order to provide a more accurate analysis of the extent to which
funds are spent ``in a manner consistent'' with each of the grantees'
plan for their use, as required by 42 U.S.C. 1397e (a), OCS continues
to request that States voluntarily use the format of the Post-
Expenditure Reporting form to create their Pre-Expenditure Report,
which provides estimates of the amount of expenditures and the number
of recipients, by service category, and is submitted as part of the
grantees' Intended Use Plan. Most of the States and Territories are
currently using the format of the Post-Expenditure Reporting form to
report estimated expenditures and recipients (the Pre-Expenditure
Report), by service category, as part of their Intended Use Plan.
On an annual basis, States and Territories are also required to
submit a Post-Expenditure Report that details their use of SSBG funds
in each of 29 service categories. Grantees are required to submit their
Post-Expenditure Report within six months of the end of the period
covered by the report. The Post-Expenditure Report must address (1) The
number of individuals (including number of children and number of
adults) who receive services paid for, in whole or in part, with
Federal funds under the SSBG; (2) The amount of SSBG funds spent in
providing each service; (3) The total amount of Federal, State, and
Local funds spent in providing each service, including SSBG funds; (4)
The method(s) by which each service is provided, showing separately the
services provided by public and private agencies; and (5) The criteria
applied in determining eligibility for each service such as income
eligibility guidelines, sliding scale fees, the effect of public
assistance benefits, and any requirements for enrollment in school or
training programs (45 CFR 96.74a). The Post-Expenditure Report must
also; (1) Indicate if recipient totals are actual or if the total
reported is based on estimates and/or sampled data; and (2) use its own
definition of child and adult in reporting the required data (45 CFR
96.74b).
This request seeks approval to reinstate and continue the use of
the current OMB approved Post-Expenditure Reporting form (OMB No. 0970-
0234) with modification, for estimating expenditures and recipients as
part of States'/Territories' Pre-Expenditure Reports and for annual
Post-Expenditure Reporting. The proposed modifications seek to
consolidate information that would be stored or transmitted elsewhere
into the singular reporting form to allow OCS to better analyze and
provide guidance to improve States efficiency in grant administration.
These modifications address the regulations 42 U.S.C. 1397e and 45 CFR
96.74 cited above by providing space on the Post-Expenditure form to
indicate the required information.
Beginning in 2013, States completed the current reporting form on
the SSBG Portal. The SSBG Portal is a secure web-based data portal. The
SSBG Portal allows for more efficient data submission without
increasing the overall burden on States. Until recently, Territories
reported the data on the Post-Expenditure Reporting form in Microsoft
Excel and submitted it to ACF, via email or posted mail. In 2017,
Territories can complete the current reporting form on the SSBG Portal.
The SSBG Portal provides a user-friendly means for States and
Territories to submit and access their Pre-Expenditure and Post-
Expenditure and Recipient Data.
Information collected in the Post-Expenditure Reports submitted by
States and Territories is analyzed and described in an annual report on
SSBG expenditures and recipients produced by the Office of Community
Services (OCS), Administration for Children and Families (ACF). The
information contained in this report is used for grant planning and
management. The data establishes how SSBG funding is used for the
provision of services in each State or Territory.
The data is also analyzed to determine the performance of States
and Territories in meeting the SSBG performance measures developed to
meet the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of
1993 (GPRA), as amended by the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 [Pub. L.
11-352; 31 U.S.C 1115(b)(10)]. GPRA requires all Federal agencies to
develop measurable performance goals.
The SSBG currently has an administrative costs efficiency measure
which is intended to decrease the percentage of SSBG funds identified
as administrative costs in the Post-Expenditure Reports [U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children
and Families, Office of Community Services. (2007, June). Implementing
a new performance measure to enhance efficiency (Information Memorandum
Transmittal No. 04-2007). Available from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ocs/resource/implementing-a-new-performance-measure-to-enhance-efficiency].
The SSBG also implements a performance measure designed to ensure that
SSBG funds are spent effectively and efficiently while maintaining the
intrinsic flexibility of the SSBG as a block grant. The performance
measure assesses the degree to which States and Territories spend SSBG
funds in a manner consistent with their intended use, as required by
Federal law [42 U.S.C. 1397e(a); U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Community
Services. (2012, February). Implementation of a new performance measure
(Information Memorandum Transmittal No. 01-2012). Available from
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ocs/resource/implementation-of-a-new-performance-measure]. It will be used to determine how well grantees
are doing overall in minimizing variance between projected and actual
expenditures of SSBG funds. This program measure began implementation
with FY 2013 data and remains ongoing.
Respondents: The Post-Expenditure Reporting form and Pre-
Expenditure Report are completed once annually by a representative of
the agency that administers the Social Services Block Grant at the
State or Territory level. Respondents include the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, as well as the territories of
American Samoa, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of
Northern Mariana Islands.
[[Page 22008]]
Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Instrument Number of responses per burden hours Total burden
respondents respondent per response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-Expenditure Reporting Form................. 56 1 110 6,160
Use of Post-Expenditure Reporting Form as Part 56 1 2 112
of the Intended Use Plan.......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 6,272.
In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chap 35), the Administration for
Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific
aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the
proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be
forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families,
Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW.,
Washington DC 20201. Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-09581 Filed 5-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-24-P