Air Plan Approval; ME; Decommissioning of Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems, 21348-21351 [2017-09174]
Download as PDF
21348
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 87 / Monday, May 8, 2017 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0296; A–1–FRL–
9961–18–Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; ME;
Decommissioning of Stage II Vapor
Recovery Systems
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Maine
Department of Environmental Protection
(Maine DEP). This SIP revision includes
regulatory amendments that repeal
Stage II vapor recovery requirements at
gasoline dispensing facilities (GDFs) as
of January 1, 2012, with the mandate
that all Stage II equipment be
decommissioned by January 1, 2013.
Maine DEP’s submission to EPA also
included a demonstration that such
removal is consistent with the Clean Air
Act and relevant EPA guidance. This
revision also includes regulatory
amendments that update Maine’s testing
and certain equipment requirements for
Stage I vapor recovery systems at GDFs.
The intended effect of this action is to
propose approval of Maine’s revised
gasoline vapor recovery regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2016–0296 by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918–0047.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0296,’’
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5
Post Office Square—Suite 100, (mail
code OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–
3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, 5 Post
Office Square—Suite 100, (mail code
OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2016–
0296. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov, or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Air Quality Planning
Unit, 5 Post Office Square—Suite 100,
Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the contact listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding legal holidays.
In addition, copies of the state
submittal are also available for public
inspection during normal business
hours, by appointment at the State Air
Agency: Bureau of Air Quality Control,
Department of Environmental
Protection, First Floor of the Tyson
Building, Augusta Mental Health
Institute Complex, Augusta, ME 04333–
0017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Rackauskas, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office, 5
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (mail
code: OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–
3912, telephone number (617) 918–
1628, fax number (617) 918–0628, email
rackauskas.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Organization of this document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of Maine’s SIP Revision
III. EPA’s Evaluation of Maine’s SIP Revision
IV. Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On April 13, 2016, the Maine DEP
submitted a revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP
revision consists of Maine’s revised
Chapter 118, Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities Vapor Control, which has
been revised to require the
decommissioning of Stage II vapor
recovery systems and to update Stage I
vapor recovery testing requirements.
The SIP submittal also includes a
demonstration that removal of Stage II
vapor recovery systems in Maine is
consistent with the Clean Air Act and
relevant EPA guidance.
Stage II and onboard refueling vapor
recovery (ORVR) systems are two types
of emission control systems that capture
fuel vapors from vehicle gas tanks
during refueling. Stage II vapor recovery
systems are installed at GDFs and
capture the refueling fuel vapors at the
gasoline pump. The system carries the
vapors back to the underground storage
tank at the GDF to prevent the vapors
from escaping to the atmosphere. ORVR
systems are carbon canisters installed
directly on automobiles to capture the
fuel vapors evacuated from the gasoline
tank before they reach the nozzle. The
fuel vapors captured in the carbon
canisters are then combusted in the
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 87 / Monday, May 8, 2017 / Proposed Rules
engine when the automobile is in
operation.
Stage II vapor recovery systems and
vehicle ORVR systems were initially
both required by the 1990 Amendments
to the Clean Air Act (CAA). Section
182(b)(3) of the CAA requires moderate
and above ozone nonattainment areas to
implement Stage II vapor recovery
programs. Also, under CAA section
184(b)(2), states in the Ozone Transport
Region (OTR) are required to implement
Stage II or comparable measures. CAA
section 202(a)(6) required EPA to
promulgate regulations for ORVR for
light-duty vehicles (passenger cars).
EPA adopted these requirements in
1994, at which point moderate ozone
nonattainment areas were no longer
subject to the CAA section 182(b)(3)
Stage II vapor recovery requirements.
ORVR equipment has been phased in for
new passenger vehicles beginning with
model year 1998, and starting with
model year 2001 for light-duty trucks
and most heavy-duty gasoline powered
vehicles. ORVR equipment has been
installed on nearly all new gasolinepowered light-duty vehicles, light-duty
trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles since
2006.1
During the phase-in of ORVR controls,
Stage II has provided volatile organic
compound (VOC) reductions in ozone
nonattainment areas and certain
attainment areas of the OTR. Congress
recognized that ORVR systems and
Stage II vapor recovery systems would
eventually become largely redundant
technologies, and provided authority to
EPA to allow states to remove Stage II
vapor recovery programs from their SIPs
after EPA finds that ORVR is in
‘‘widespread use.’’ Effective May 16,
2012, the date the final rule was
published in the Federal Register (see
77 FR 28772), EPA determined that
ORVR systems are in widespread use
nationwide for control of gasoline
emissions during refueling of vehicles at
GDFs. As of the end of 2016, EPA
estimates that more than 88 percent of
gasoline refueling nationwide occurs
with ORVR-equipped vehicles.2 Thus,
Stage II vapor recovery programs have
become largely redundant control
systems and Stage II vapor recovery
systems achieve an ever declining
emissions benefit as more ORVRequipped vehicles continue to enter the
1 EPA Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline
Vapor Control Programs from State Implementation
Plans and Assessing Comparable Measures, Table
A–1, August 7, 2012.
2 EPA Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline
Vapor Control Programs from State Implementation
Plans and Assessing Comparable Measures, Table
A–1, August 7, 2012.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
on-road motor vehicle fleet.3 In its May
16, 2012 rulemaking, EPA also exercised
its authority under CAA section
202(a)(6) to waive certain federal
statutory requirements for Stage II vapor
recovery systems at GDFs. This decision
exempts all new ozone nonattainment
areas classified serious or above from
the requirement to adopt Stage II vapor
recovery programs. Finally, EPA’s May
16, 2012 rulemaking also noted that any
state currently implementing Stage II
vapor recovery programs may submit
SIP revisions that would allow for the
phase-out of Stage II vapor recovery
systems.
Stage I vapor recovery systems are
systems that capture vapors displaced
from storage tanks at GDFs during
gasoline tank truck deliveries. When
gasoline is delivered into an
aboveground or underground storage
tank, vapors that were taking up space
in the storage tank are displaced by the
gasoline entering the storage tank. The
Stage I vapor recovery systems route
these displaced vapors into the delivery
truck’s tank. Some vapors are vented
when the storage tank exceeds a
specified pressure threshold, however
the Stage I vapor recovery systems
greatly reduce the possibility of these
displaced vapors being released into the
atmosphere.
Stage I vapor recovery systems have
been in place since the 1970s. EPA has
issued the following guidance regarding
Stage I systems: ‘‘Design Criteria for
Stage I Vapor Control Systems—
Gasoline Service Stations’’ (November
1975, EPA Online Publication
450R75102), which is regarded as the
control techniques guideline (CTG) for
the control of VOC emissions from this
source category; and the EPA document
‘‘Model Volatile Organic Compound
Rules for Reasonably Available Control
Technology’’ (Staff Working Draft, June
1992) contains a model Stage I
regulation.
II. Summary of Maine’s SIP Revision
Maine adopted its Stage II Vapor
Recovery Program in 1995 in order to
satisfy the requirements of sections
182(b)(3) and 184(b)(2) of the CAA. The
Maine Stage II vapor recovery program
requirements were codified in Maine’s
Chapter 118, Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities Vapor Control, and EPA
3 In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist
Stage II vapor recovery systems are used, the
differences in operational design characteristics
between ORVR and some configurations of these
Stage II vapor recovery systems result in the
reduction of overall control system efficiency
compared to what could have been achieved
relative to the individual control efficiencies of
either ORVR or Stage II emissions from the vehicle
fuel tank.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21349
approved the program into the Maine
SIP on October 15, 1996 (61 FR 53636).
Maine’s rule required gasoline
dispensing facilities located in the
counties of York, Cumberland, and
Sagadahoc to install Stage II vapor
recovery systems.
On April 13, 2016, Maine submitted
a SIP revision consisting of its revised
Chapter 118. This revised rule requires
GDFs to decommission their Stage II
vapor recovery systems as of January 1,
2013, and contains an appendix
detailing the requirements and
procedures for disabling the Stage II
vapor recovery systems based on the
Petroleum Equipment Institute’s
Recommended Practices for Installation
and Testing of Vapor-Recovery Systems
at Vehicle-Fueling Sites, PEI RP 300–09,
Section 14, Decommissioning Stage II
Vapor Recovery Piping, 2009 edition.
In addition, the revised regulation
also includes requirements that any
GDF whose monthly throughput ever
exceeds a threshold of 100,000 gallons
per calendar month be subject to the
requirements of 40 CFR part 63 Subpart
CCCCCC—National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
for Source Category: Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities. Furthermore, any
GDF that ever exceeds 100,000 gallons
per calendar month threshold will
remain subject to the NESHAP
requirements even if the monthly
throughput ever falls below this
threshold.
Maine’s revised Chapter 118 also
includes updated Stage I testing
procedures. The procedures now mirror
the NESHAP testing requirements for
Stage I vapor recovery systems. Any
GDF with a monthly throughput over
100,000 gallons per month must
perform an initial ‘‘P/V Cap Test’’ in
accordance with California Air
Resources Board’s TP–201.1E. The test
must be repeated at least every three
years thereafter. In addition, any GDF
with at least a 100,000 gallons per
month throughput must perform a
pressure decay test every three years in
accordance with CARB’s TP–201.3.
Furthermore, all installation and
function of Stage I vapor recovery
systems must be re-verified upon any
major system replacement or
modification. Functional tests must be
performed within 30 days upon request
by the Maine DEP when inspections,
records, or other evidence show
noncompliance with the state
regulation. These tests must be
performed during normal business
hours, with notification to the Maine
DEP provided in writing at least 5 days
prior to the test. All test results must be
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
21350
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 87 / Monday, May 8, 2017 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
provided to the Maine DEP within 30
days.
The revised Chapter 118 also includes
additional procedures for ensuring that
the hoses in the Stage I vapor balance
system are properly connected. The
vapor hose must be connected to the
cargo tank and delivery elbow before
connecting to the facility storage tank;
the cargo tank valve must be opened
only after all vapor connections are
made, and closed before any vapor
connections are disconnected; and the
vapor return hose must be disconnected
from the facility storage tank before it is
disconnected from the cargo tank.
The April 13, 2016 SIP submission
also includes a narrative demonstration
supporting the discontinuation of the
Maine Stage II vapor recovery program.
This demonstration, discussed in greater
detail below, consists of an analysis that
the Stage II vapor recovery controls
provide only de minimis emission
reductions due to the prevalence of
ORVR-equipped vehicles.
III. EPA’s Evaluation of Maine’s SIP
Revision
EPA has reviewed Maine’s revised
Chapter 118, Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities Vapor Control, and
accompanying SIP narrative, and has
concluded that Maine’s April 13, 2016
SIP revision is consistent with EPA’s
widespread use rule (77 FR 28772, May
16, 2012) and with EPA’s ‘‘Guidance on
Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor
Control Programs from State
Implementation Plans and Assessing
Comparable Measures’’ (EPA–457/B–
12–001; August 7, 2012), hereafter
referred to as EPA’s Guidance
Document.
Maine’s April 13, 2016 SIP revision
includes a CAA section 110(l) anti-back
sliding demonstration based on the
relevant equations contained in EPA’s
Guidance Document. Maine’s
demonstration uses the EPA Guidance
Document’s estimate that, in 2012,
71.4% of gasoline refueling nationwide
occurred with ORVR-equipped
vehicles.4 According to these
calculations, the potential loss of
refueling emission reductions resulting
from the removal of Stage II vapor
recovery systems in 2012 (the year
leading up to Maine’s January 1, 2013
decommissioning deadline) is between
6.2 and 9.2 percent, thus meeting the 10
percent de minimis recommendation in
EPA’s Guidance Document.5
4 EPA Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline
Vapor Control Programs from State Implementation
Plans and Assessing Comparable Measures, Table
A–1, August 7, 2012.
5 This range of estimates for the potential loss of
refueling emission reductions results from the range
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
In addition, Maine’s April 13, 2016
SIP revision also includes calculations
illustrating that the overall effect of
removing the Stage II vapor recovery
program would be an increase of
between 45 and 68 tons of VOC in 2012.
EPA’s 2011 National Emissions
Inventory database illustrates that
Maine’s anthropogenic VOC emissions
for York, Cumberland, and Sagadahoc
Counties were about 48,484 tons (see
https://www.epa.gov/air-emissionsinventories/2011-national-emissionsinventory-nei-data); therefore the 45 to
68 annual tons of VOC emissions
increase calculated by Maine to have
occurred in 2012 are only about 0.2 to
0.4 percent of the total anthropogenic
VOC emissions in these three counties
for that year. Also, these foregone
emissions reductions continue to
diminish rapidly over time as ORVR
phase-in continues. That is, the
estimated 45 to 68 tons of VOC in 2012
have decreased since that time on an
annual basis. Therefore, EPA believes
that the resulting temporary increases in
VOC emissions that occurred by
removing the Stage II program will not
interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
With respect to Stage I vapor recovery
requirements, Maine’s revised Chapter
118 is at least as stringent as the
previously approved version of the rule,
thus meeting the CAA section 110(l)
anti-back sliding requirements. The
revision includes updated instructions
for ensuring the hoses in the vapor
balance system were properly
connected, and includes more
comprehensive testing procedures than
the previous SIP-approved rule. This
revision will help to ensure that the
Stage I vapor recovery equipment is
working properly so that the expected
emission reductions occur. These
testing procedures mirror the guidelines
for GDFs with a monthly throughput of
100,000 gallons or more identified in 40
CFR 63, Subpart CCCCCC.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Maine’s
April 13, 2016 SIP revision.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve Maine’s revised Chapter 118,
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor
Control, and incorporate it into the
Maine SIP. EPA is proposing to approve
this SIP revision because it meets all
applicable requirements of the Clean Air
Act and relevant EPA guidance, and it
of estimates for the in-use control efficiency of
Stage II vapor recovery systems. EPA’s Guidance
Document suggests these efficiency values range
from 0.60 to 0.75. See pages 10–11 of EPA’s
Guidance Document.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this notice or on
other relevant matters. These comments
will be considered before taking final
action. Interested parties may
participate in the Federal rulemaking
procedure by submitting written
comments to the EPA New England
Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this Federal Register.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference of
the State of Maine’s revised Chapter 118
described in section IV of this notice.
The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 87 / Monday, May 8, 2017 / Proposed Rules
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. 2017–09174 Filed 5–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R01–OAR–2015–0198; FRL–9961–16–
Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; CT; Infrastructure
Requirement for the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
the remaining portion of a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Connecticut.
This revision addresses the interstate
transport requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA), referred to as the good
neighbor provision, with respect to the
2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
This action proposes to approve
Connecticut’s demonstration that the
state is meeting its obligations regarding
the transport of SO2 emissions into
other states. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2015–0198 by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: dahl.donald@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918–0657.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2015–0198,’’
Donald Dahl, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Permits, Toxics, and
Indoor Programs Unit, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, (mail code OEP05–
2), Boston, MA 02109—3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. At the
previously listed EPA Region I address.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2015–
0198. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21351
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://
www.regulations.gov or at U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
In addition, copies of the state
submittal and EPA’s technical support
document are also available for public
inspection during normal business
hours, by appointment at the State Air
Agency; the Bureau of Air Management,
Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection, State Office
Building, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT
06106–1630.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Dahl, (617) 918–1657; or by
email at dahl.donald@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Summary of the Proposed Action
III. Section 110(A)(2)(D)(i)(I)—Interstate
Transport
A. General Requirements and Historical
Approaches for Criteria Pollutants
B. Approach for Addressing the Interstate
Transport Requirements of the 2010
Primary SO2 NAAQS in Connecticut
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 87 (Monday, May 8, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21348-21351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09174]
[[Page 21348]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0296; A-1-FRL-9961-18-Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; ME; Decommissioning of Stage II Vapor Recovery
Systems
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection (Maine DEP). This
SIP revision includes regulatory amendments that repeal Stage II vapor
recovery requirements at gasoline dispensing facilities (GDFs) as of
January 1, 2012, with the mandate that all Stage II equipment be
decommissioned by January 1, 2013. Maine DEP's submission to EPA also
included a demonstration that such removal is consistent with the Clean
Air Act and relevant EPA guidance. This revision also includes
regulatory amendments that update Maine's testing and certain equipment
requirements for Stage I vapor recovery systems at GDFs. The intended
effect of this action is to propose approval of Maine's revised
gasoline vapor recovery regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R01-OAR-2016-0296 by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918-0047.
4. Mail: ``Docket Identification Number EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0296,''
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning
Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA
02109-3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (mail code OEP05-2),
Boston, MA 02109-3912. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-
2016-0296. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov, or
email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Air Quality
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
In addition, copies of the state submittal are also available for
public inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the
State Air Agency: Bureau of Air Quality Control, Department of
Environmental Protection, First Floor of the Tyson Building, Augusta
Mental Health Institute Complex, Augusta, ME 04333-0017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Rackauskas, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (mail code: OEP05-2), Boston,
MA 02109-3912, telephone number (617) 918-1628, fax number (617) 918-
0628, email rackauskas.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of Maine's SIP Revision
III. EPA's Evaluation of Maine's SIP Revision
IV. Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On April 13, 2016, the Maine DEP submitted a revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision consists of Maine's revised
Chapter 118, Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control, which has
been revised to require the decommissioning of Stage II vapor recovery
systems and to update Stage I vapor recovery testing requirements. The
SIP submittal also includes a demonstration that removal of Stage II
vapor recovery systems in Maine is consistent with the Clean Air Act
and relevant EPA guidance.
Stage II and onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) systems are
two types of emission control systems that capture fuel vapors from
vehicle gas tanks during refueling. Stage II vapor recovery systems are
installed at GDFs and capture the refueling fuel vapors at the gasoline
pump. The system carries the vapors back to the underground storage
tank at the GDF to prevent the vapors from escaping to the atmosphere.
ORVR systems are carbon canisters installed directly on automobiles to
capture the fuel vapors evacuated from the gasoline tank before they
reach the nozzle. The fuel vapors captured in the carbon canisters are
then combusted in the
[[Page 21349]]
engine when the automobile is in operation.
Stage II vapor recovery systems and vehicle ORVR systems were
initially both required by the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act
(CAA). Section 182(b)(3) of the CAA requires moderate and above ozone
nonattainment areas to implement Stage II vapor recovery programs.
Also, under CAA section 184(b)(2), states in the Ozone Transport Region
(OTR) are required to implement Stage II or comparable measures. CAA
section 202(a)(6) required EPA to promulgate regulations for ORVR for
light-duty vehicles (passenger cars). EPA adopted these requirements in
1994, at which point moderate ozone nonattainment areas were no longer
subject to the CAA section 182(b)(3) Stage II vapor recovery
requirements. ORVR equipment has been phased in for new passenger
vehicles beginning with model year 1998, and starting with model year
2001 for light-duty trucks and most heavy-duty gasoline powered
vehicles. ORVR equipment has been installed on nearly all new gasoline-
powered light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles
since 2006.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control
Programs from State Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable
Measures, Table A-1, August 7, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the phase-in of ORVR controls, Stage II has provided
volatile organic compound (VOC) reductions in ozone nonattainment areas
and certain attainment areas of the OTR. Congress recognized that ORVR
systems and Stage II vapor recovery systems would eventually become
largely redundant technologies, and provided authority to EPA to allow
states to remove Stage II vapor recovery programs from their SIPs after
EPA finds that ORVR is in ``widespread use.'' Effective May 16, 2012,
the date the final rule was published in the Federal Register (see 77
FR 28772), EPA determined that ORVR systems are in widespread use
nationwide for control of gasoline emissions during refueling of
vehicles at GDFs. As of the end of 2016, EPA estimates that more than
88 percent of gasoline refueling nationwide occurs with ORVR-equipped
vehicles.\2\ Thus, Stage II vapor recovery programs have become largely
redundant control systems and Stage II vapor recovery systems achieve
an ever declining emissions benefit as more ORVR-equipped vehicles
continue to enter the on-road motor vehicle fleet.\3\ In its May 16,
2012 rulemaking, EPA also exercised its authority under CAA section
202(a)(6) to waive certain federal statutory requirements for Stage II
vapor recovery systems at GDFs. This decision exempts all new ozone
nonattainment areas classified serious or above from the requirement to
adopt Stage II vapor recovery programs. Finally, EPA's May 16, 2012
rulemaking also noted that any state currently implementing Stage II
vapor recovery programs may submit SIP revisions that would allow for
the phase-out of Stage II vapor recovery systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ EPA Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control
Programs from State Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable
Measures, Table A-1, August 7, 2012.
\3\ In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist Stage II vapor
recovery systems are used, the differences in operational design
characteristics between ORVR and some configurations of these Stage
II vapor recovery systems result in the reduction of overall control
system efficiency compared to what could have been achieved relative
to the individual control efficiencies of either ORVR or Stage II
emissions from the vehicle fuel tank.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage I vapor recovery systems are systems that capture vapors
displaced from storage tanks at GDFs during gasoline tank truck
deliveries. When gasoline is delivered into an aboveground or
underground storage tank, vapors that were taking up space in the
storage tank are displaced by the gasoline entering the storage tank.
The Stage I vapor recovery systems route these displaced vapors into
the delivery truck's tank. Some vapors are vented when the storage tank
exceeds a specified pressure threshold, however the Stage I vapor
recovery systems greatly reduce the possibility of these displaced
vapors being released into the atmosphere.
Stage I vapor recovery systems have been in place since the 1970s.
EPA has issued the following guidance regarding Stage I systems:
``Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems--Gasoline Service
Stations'' (November 1975, EPA Online Publication 450R75102), which is
regarded as the control techniques guideline (CTG) for the control of
VOC emissions from this source category; and the EPA document ``Model
Volatile Organic Compound Rules for Reasonably Available Control
Technology'' (Staff Working Draft, June 1992) contains a model Stage I
regulation.
II. Summary of Maine's SIP Revision
Maine adopted its Stage II Vapor Recovery Program in 1995 in order
to satisfy the requirements of sections 182(b)(3) and 184(b)(2) of the
CAA. The Maine Stage II vapor recovery program requirements were
codified in Maine's Chapter 118, Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor
Control, and EPA approved the program into the Maine SIP on October 15,
1996 (61 FR 53636). Maine's rule required gasoline dispensing
facilities located in the counties of York, Cumberland, and Sagadahoc
to install Stage II vapor recovery systems.
On April 13, 2016, Maine submitted a SIP revision consisting of its
revised Chapter 118. This revised rule requires GDFs to decommission
their Stage II vapor recovery systems as of January 1, 2013, and
contains an appendix detailing the requirements and procedures for
disabling the Stage II vapor recovery systems based on the Petroleum
Equipment Institute's Recommended Practices for Installation and
Testing of Vapor-Recovery Systems at Vehicle-Fueling Sites, PEI RP 300-
09, Section 14, Decommissioning Stage II Vapor Recovery Piping, 2009
edition.
In addition, the revised regulation also includes requirements that
any GDF whose monthly throughput ever exceeds a threshold of 100,000
gallons per calendar month be subject to the requirements of 40 CFR
part 63 Subpart CCCCCC--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Source Category: Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities. Furthermore, any GDF that ever exceeds 100,000 gallons per
calendar month threshold will remain subject to the NESHAP requirements
even if the monthly throughput ever falls below this threshold.
Maine's revised Chapter 118 also includes updated Stage I testing
procedures. The procedures now mirror the NESHAP testing requirements
for Stage I vapor recovery systems. Any GDF with a monthly throughput
over 100,000 gallons per month must perform an initial ``P/V Cap Test''
in accordance with California Air Resources Board's TP-201.1E. The test
must be repeated at least every three years thereafter. In addition,
any GDF with at least a 100,000 gallons per month throughput must
perform a pressure decay test every three years in accordance with
CARB's TP-201.3. Furthermore, all installation and function of Stage I
vapor recovery systems must be re-verified upon any major system
replacement or modification. Functional tests must be performed within
30 days upon request by the Maine DEP when inspections, records, or
other evidence show noncompliance with the state regulation. These
tests must be performed during normal business hours, with notification
to the Maine DEP provided in writing at least 5 days prior to the test.
All test results must be
[[Page 21350]]
provided to the Maine DEP within 30 days.
The revised Chapter 118 also includes additional procedures for
ensuring that the hoses in the Stage I vapor balance system are
properly connected. The vapor hose must be connected to the cargo tank
and delivery elbow before connecting to the facility storage tank; the
cargo tank valve must be opened only after all vapor connections are
made, and closed before any vapor connections are disconnected; and the
vapor return hose must be disconnected from the facility storage tank
before it is disconnected from the cargo tank.
The April 13, 2016 SIP submission also includes a narrative
demonstration supporting the discontinuation of the Maine Stage II
vapor recovery program. This demonstration, discussed in greater detail
below, consists of an analysis that the Stage II vapor recovery
controls provide only de minimis emission reductions due to the
prevalence of ORVR-equipped vehicles.
III. EPA's Evaluation of Maine's SIP Revision
EPA has reviewed Maine's revised Chapter 118, Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities Vapor Control, and accompanying SIP narrative, and has
concluded that Maine's April 13, 2016 SIP revision is consistent with
EPA's widespread use rule (77 FR 28772, May 16, 2012) and with EPA's
``Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control Programs from
State Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable Measures'' (EPA-
457/B-12-001; August 7, 2012), hereafter referred to as EPA's Guidance
Document.
Maine's April 13, 2016 SIP revision includes a CAA section 110(l)
anti-back sliding demonstration based on the relevant equations
contained in EPA's Guidance Document. Maine's demonstration uses the
EPA Guidance Document's estimate that, in 2012, 71.4% of gasoline
refueling nationwide occurred with ORVR-equipped vehicles.\4\ According
to these calculations, the potential loss of refueling emission
reductions resulting from the removal of Stage II vapor recovery
systems in 2012 (the year leading up to Maine's January 1, 2013
decommissioning deadline) is between 6.2 and 9.2 percent, thus meeting
the 10 percent de minimis recommendation in EPA's Guidance Document.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ EPA Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control
Programs from State Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable
Measures, Table A-1, August 7, 2012.
\5\ This range of estimates for the potential loss of refueling
emission reductions results from the range of estimates for the in-
use control efficiency of Stage II vapor recovery systems. EPA's
Guidance Document suggests these efficiency values range from 0.60
to 0.75. See pages 10-11 of EPA's Guidance Document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, Maine's April 13, 2016 SIP revision also includes
calculations illustrating that the overall effect of removing the Stage
II vapor recovery program would be an increase of between 45 and 68
tons of VOC in 2012. EPA's 2011 National Emissions Inventory database
illustrates that Maine's anthropogenic VOC emissions for York,
Cumberland, and Sagadahoc Counties were about 48,484 tons (see https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2011-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data); therefore the 45 to 68 annual tons of VOC
emissions increase calculated by Maine to have occurred in 2012 are
only about 0.2 to 0.4 percent of the total anthropogenic VOC emissions
in these three counties for that year. Also, these foregone emissions
reductions continue to diminish rapidly over time as ORVR phase-in
continues. That is, the estimated 45 to 68 tons of VOC in 2012 have
decreased since that time on an annual basis. Therefore, EPA believes
that the resulting temporary increases in VOC emissions that occurred
by removing the Stage II program will not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
With respect to Stage I vapor recovery requirements, Maine's
revised Chapter 118 is at least as stringent as the previously approved
version of the rule, thus meeting the CAA section 110(l) anti-back
sliding requirements. The revision includes updated instructions for
ensuring the hoses in the vapor balance system were properly connected,
and includes more comprehensive testing procedures than the previous
SIP-approved rule. This revision will help to ensure that the Stage I
vapor recovery equipment is working properly so that the expected
emission reductions occur. These testing procedures mirror the
guidelines for GDFs with a monthly throughput of 100,000 gallons or
more identified in 40 CFR 63, Subpart CCCCCC.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Maine's April 13, 2016 SIP revision.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve Maine's revised Chapter 118,
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control, and incorporate it into
the Maine SIP. EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision because it
meets all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act and relevant EPA
guidance, and it will not interfere with attainment or maintenance of
the ozone NAAQS.
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
notice or on other relevant matters. These comments will be considered
before taking final action. Interested parties may participate in the
Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA
New England Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
Federal Register.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference of the State of Maine's revised Chapter 118 described in
section IV of this notice. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
[[Page 21351]]
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2017-09174 Filed 5-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P