Certain Steel Threaded Rod From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, in Part; 2015-2016, 21189-21192 [2017-09140]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Notices
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should also be directed to
the Designated Federal Official as soon
as known, and preferably two weeks
prior to the meeting.
Due to increased security and for
access to the meeting, please call 301–
763–9906 upon arrival at the Census
Bureau on the day of the meeting. A
photo ID must be presented in order to
receive your visitor’s badge. Visitors are
not allowed beyond the first floor.
Date: April 28, 2017.
John H. Thompson,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 2017–09132 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–932]
Certain Steel Threaded Rod From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, in Part; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) preliminarily determines
that mandatory respondent Zhejiang
New Oriental Fastener Co., Ltd. (New
Oriental), does not qualify for a separate
rate and is, therefore, considered a part
of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)wide entity for its exports of subject
merchandise exported to the United
States during the period of review
(POR), April 1, 2015, through March 31,
2016. We also preliminarily find that
mandatory respondent IFI & Morgan
Ltd. and RMB Fasteners Ltd. (RMB/IFI
Group), did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR. If these
preliminary results are adopted in the
final results, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping
duties (AD) on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective May 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Renkey or Courtney Canales,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2312 or
(202) 482–4997, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2016, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the AD order on certain steel
threaded rod (STR) from the PRC for the
period of review April 1, 2015, through
March 31, 2016. The Department
initiated a review with respect to 117
companies.1 Subsequently, on
September 12, 2016, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
correction to the Initiation Notice,
adding an additional three companies.2
The Department selected two mandatory
respondents, New Oriental and RMB/IFI
Group, based on highest volume of
exports.3 Between September 6, 2016,
and April 5, 2017, the Department
requested and received information
from the RMB/IFI Group pertaining to
RMB/IFI Group’s claim of no shipments,
and also received comments from
Petitioner 4 about this issue. The other
mandatory respondent, New Oriental,
did not respond to the Department’s AD
questionnaire. Tianjin Port Free Trade
Zone Tianjin Star International Trade
Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Star), submitted a
separate rate application, and requested
to be a mandatory or voluntary
respondent, but it never responded to
the Department’s AD questionnaire. On
September 21, 2016, the petitioner
withdrew its request for review for 115
companies.5 However, the petitioner did
not withdraw its request for review on
New Oriental, RMB/IFI Group, Tianjin
Star, Zhejiang Heiter Industries Co., Ltd.
(Zhejiang Heiter Industries), and
Zhejiang Heiter Mfg & Trade Co. Ltd.
(Zhejiang Heiter Mfg).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
includes steel threaded rod. The subject
merchandise is currently classifiable
under subheading 7318.15.5051,
7318.15.5056, 7318.15.5090, and
7318.15.2095 of the United States
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
36272 (June 6, 2016) (Initiation Notice). The
Initiation Notice inaccurately stated the period of
review, which was corrected in a notice published
on July 7, 2016. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
44260, 44265 (July 7, 2016).
2 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 62726 dated
September 12, 2016.
3 See Respondent Selection Memo dated August
29, 2016.
4 Vulcan Threaded Products Inc. (Vulcan) (the
petitioner).
5 See the petitioner’submission dated September
21, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21189
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.6
Rescission of Review, In Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, ‘‘in whole or in
part, if a party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review.’’
Petitioner timely withdrew its review
requests with respect to 115 companies.
Because we received no other requests
for review of these 115 companies,7 we
are rescinding the administrative review
with respect to all companies except
New Oriental, RMB/IFI Group, Tianjin
Star, Zhejiang Heiter Industries and
Zhejiang Heiter Mfg, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
No Shipments
On July 5, 2016, RMB/IFI Group filed
a no-shipment certification indicating
that it did not export subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR. During the course of this
review, the Department examined this
no shipments claim and provides its
analysis in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Based on the record evidence, we
preliminarily determine that RMB/IFI
Group did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR. In
addition, we find that it is appropriate
not to rescind the review, in part, in this
circumstance, and to complete the
review with respect to the above-named
company, issuing appropriate
instructions to CBP based on the final
results of the review.8 Should evidence
contrary to RMB/IFI’s no-shipments
claims arise, we will address the issue
in accordance with our governing
statute and regulations.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
6 For a full description of the scope of the Order,
see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled, ‘‘Certain
Steel Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of
China: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the 2015–2016 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review’’ (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice.
7 See Appendix II for the list of companies.
8 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–65695 (October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
21190
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Notices
Because New Oriental did not respond
to our AD questionnaire, including
Section A, which requests its separate
rate information, we preliminarily find
that New Oriental has not demonstrated
its eligibility for a separate rate, and
accordingly, we are preliminarily
treating New Oriental as part of the
PRC-wide entity. In addition, because
neither Zhejiang Heiter Industries nor
Zhejiang Heiter Mfg submitted a
separate rate application, we are also
preliminarily treating both companies as
part of the PRC-wide entity. We also
preliminarily determine that Tianjin
Star is eligible for a separate rate.
The statute and the Department’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
respondents not selected for individual
examination when the Department
limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act.
Generally, the Department looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
respondents which we did not
individually examine in an
administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act articulates a
preference that we not calculate an allothers rate using rates which are zero,
de minimis or based entirely on facts
available. When the weighted-average
dumping margins established for all
individually investigated respondents
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely
on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act permits the Department to ‘‘use
any reasonable method to establish the
estimated all-others rate for exporters
and producers not individually
investigated, including averaging the
estimated weighted average dumping
margins determined for the exporters
and producers individually
investigated.’’ Because New Oriental is
part of the PRC-wide entity, for which
no review was requested, and RMB/IFI
Group did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR, there are
no calculated margins that are not zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available to consider in establishing a
margin for Tianjin Star. In the absence
of any calculated rates in this segment,
to determine a non-selected rate for
Tianjin Star in this review, we have
reached back to the calculated above-de
minimis rate from the immediately
preceding administrative review. For a
full description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary conclusions,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
I to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and the electronic versions
of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period April 1, 2015, through March 31,
2016:
Weightedaverage
margins
Exporter/producer
Tianjin Port Free Trade Zone Tianjin Star International Trade Co., Ltd .............................................................................................
PRC-Wide Entity 9 ................................................................................................................................................................................
5.40
206.00
9 The PRC-wide entity includes mandatory respondent New Oriental Fastener Co., Ltd., as well as Zhejiang Heiter Industries and Zhejiang
Heiter Mfg. The rate for the PRC-Wide Entity was originally set in the original investigation, see Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 74 FR 8907 (February 27, 2009). This rate has been used in each subsequent administrative review in which there was party being considered as part of the PRC-Wide Entity.
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with its
preliminary results within five days of
its public announcement or, if there is
no public announcement, within five
days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). However, because the
Department is not calculating a
weighted-average dumping margin for
either of the mandatory respondents
selected for individual examination,
there are no calculations to disclose.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments
may be submitted to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of the
preliminary determination, unless the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
Secretary alters the time limit. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be submitted no later than
five days after the deadline date for case
briefs.10 Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this investigation are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, limited to issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
10 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, whether any
participant is a foreign national, and a
list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, 20230, at a time and
date to be determined. Parties should
confirm by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, which will include the results of
our analysis of all issues raised in the
case briefs, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results
in the Federal Register, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Notices
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.11 The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication date of the
final results of this review.
For any individually examined
respondent whose weighted average
dumping margin is above de minimis
(i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of
this review, the Department will
calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales to the total
entered value of sales, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem rate is greater than de minimis,
the Department will instruct CBP to
collect the appropriate duties at the time
of liquidation.12 Where either a
respondent’s weighted average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.13
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by sections
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the
companies listed above that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that established in the final results of
this review (except, if the rate is zero or
de minimis, then zero cash deposit will
be required); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that
received a separate rate in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all
PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be that for the PRC-Wide entity (i.e.,
206 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
11 See
19 CFR 351.212(b).
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
13 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
12 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This preliminary determination is
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: May 1, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
a. Partial Rescission
b. No Shipments
c. NME Country Status
d. Separate Rates
e. Companies Considered as Part of the
PRC-Wide Entity
5. Recommendation
Appendix II
List of Companies for Which Petitioner Has
Withdrawn Its Request for Administrative
Review
1. Aerospace Precision Corp. (Shanghai)
Industry Co., Ltd.
2. Aihua Holding Group Co. Ltd.
3. Autocraft Industry (Shanghai) Ltd.
4. Autocraft Industry Ltd.
5. Billion Land Ltd.
6. Billiongold Hardware Co. Ltd.
7. Bolt MFG. Trade Ltd.
8. Brighton Best International (Taiwan) Inc.
9. Brother Holding Group Co. Ltd.
10. C and H International Corporation
11. Certified Products International Inc.
12. Changshu City Standard Parts Factory
13. China Friendly Nation Hardware
Technology Limited
14. D.M.D. International Co. Ltd.
15. Dongxiang Accuracy Hardware Co., Ltd.
16. EC International (Nantong) Co., Ltd.
17. Fastco (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd.
18. Fasten International Co., Ltd.
19. Fastwell Industry Co. Ltd.
20. Fook Shing Bolts & Nuts Co. Ltd.
21. Fuda Xiongzhen Macyinery Co., Ltd.
22. Fuller Shanghai Co Ltd.
23. Gem-Year Industrial Co. Ltd.
24. Guangdong Honjinn Metal & Plastic Co.,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21191
Ltd.
25. Hainan Zhongyan United Development
Co.
26. Hainan Zhongda Fastener Co., Ltd.
27. Haiyan Chaqqiang Standard Fasterner
28. Haiyan Dayu Fasterners Co., Ltd.
29. Haiyan Evergreen Standard Parts Co. Ltd.
30. Haiyan Fuxin High Strength Fasterner
31. Haiyan Hurras Import & Export Co. Ltd.
32. Haiyan Jianhe Hardward Co. Ltd.
33. Haiyan Julong Standard Part Co. Ltd.
34. Haiyan Yuxing Nuts Co. Ltd.
35. Hangzhou Everbright Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd.
36. Hangzhou Grand Imp & Exp. Co., Ltd.
37. Hangzhou Great Imp & Exp. Co. Ltd.
38. Hangzhou Lizhan Hardware Co. Ltd.
39. Hangzhou Tongwang Machinery Co., Ltd.
40. Hong Kong Sunrise Fasteners Co. Ltd.
41. Hong Kong Yichen Co. Ltd.
42. Jiangsu Zhongweiyu Communication
Equipment Co. Ltd.
43. Jiashan Steelfit Trading Co. Ltd.
44. Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co.,
Ltd.
45. Jiaxing Jinhow Import & Export Co., Ltd.
46. Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co. Ltd.
47. Jiaxing Yaoliang Import & Export Co., Ltd.
48. Jinan Banghe Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
49. King Socket Screw Company Ltd.
50. L&W Fasteners Company
51. Macropower Industrial Inc.
52. Mai Seng International Trading Co., Ltd.
53. MB Services Company
54. Midas Union Co., Ltd.
55. Nanjing Prosper Import & Export
Corporation Ltd.
56. New Pole Power System Co. Ltd.
57. Ningbiao Bolts & Nuts Manufacturing Co.
58. Ningbo Beilun Milfast Metalworks Co.
Ltd.
59. Ningbo Beilun Pingxin Hardware Co.,
Ltd.
60. Ningbo Dexin Fastener Co. Ltd.
61. Ningbo Dongxin High-Strength Nut Co.,
Ltd.
62. Ningbo Fastener Factory
63. Ningbo Fengya Imp. and Exp. Co. Ltd.
64. Ningbo Fourway Co., Ltd.
65. Ningbo Haishu Holy Hardware Import
and Export Co. Ltd.
66. Ningbo Haishu Wit Import & Export Co.
Ltd.
67. Ningbo Haishu Yixie Import & Export Co.
Ltd.
68. Ningbo Jinding Fastening Pieces Co., Ltd.
69. Ningbo MPF Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
70. Ningbo Panxiang Imp. & Exp., Co. Ltd.
71. Ningbo Qianjiu Instrument Case Factory
72. Ningbo Yili Import & Export Co., Ltd.
73. Ningbo Yinzhou Dongxiang Accuarcy
Hardware Co., Ltd.
74. Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.
75. Ningbo Yinzhou Woafan Industry &
Trade Co., Ltd.
76. Ningbo Zhendai Dingli Fasterner Screw
Co., Ltd.
77. Ningbo Zhenghai Yongding Fastener Co.,
Ltd.
78. Ningbo Zhongjiang High Strength Bolts
Co. Ltd.
79. Ningbo Zhongjiang Petroleum Pipes &
Machinery Co., Ltd.
80. Orient International Holding Shanghai
Rongheng Intl Trading Co. Ltd.
81. Pol Shin Fastener (Zhejiang) Co.
82. Prosper Business and Industry Co., Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
21192
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Notices
83. Qingdao Free Trade Zone Health Intl.
84. Qingdao Top Steel Industrial Co. Ltd.
85. Shaanxi Succeed Trading Co., Ltd.
86. Shanghai Autocraft Co., Ltd.
87. Shanghai East Best Foreign Trade Co.
88. Shanghai East Best International Business
Development Co., Ltd.
89. Shanghai Fortune International Co. Ltd.
90. Shanghai Furen International Trading
91. Shanghai Hunan Foreign Economic Co.,
Ltd.
92. Shanghai Jiabao Trade Development Co.
Ltd.
93. Shanghai Nanshi Foreign Economic Co.
94. Shanghai Overseas International Trading
Co. Ltd.
95. Shanghai Prime Machinery Co. Ltd.
96. Shanghai Printing & Dyeing and Knitting
Mill
97. Shanghai Printing & Packaging Machinery
Corp.
98. Shanghai Recky International Trading
Co., Ltd.
99. Shanghai Sinotex United Corp. Ltd.
100. SRC Metal (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
101. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd.
102. Suzhou Henry International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
103. T and C Fastener Co. Ltd.
104. T and L Industry Co. Ltd.
105. Wisechain Trading Limited
106. Wuxi Metec Metal Co. Ltd.
107. Zhejiang Heirrmu Mechanical and
Electrical Equipment Manufacturing Co.
Ltd.
108. Zhejiang Jin Zeen Fasteners Co. Ltd.
109. Zhejiang Junyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.
110. Zhejiang Laibao Precision Technology
Co. Ltd.
111. Zhejiang Metals & Minerals Imp & Exp
Co. Ltd.
112. Zhejiang Morgan Brother Technology
Co. Ltd.
113. Zhejiang New Century Imp & Exp Co.
Ltd.
114. Zhejiang Zhenglian Industry
Development Co., Ltd.
115. Zhoushan Zhengyuan Standard Parts
Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2017–09140 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[A–570–983]
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination
of No Shipments; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on drawn
stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order
include drawn stainless steel sinks.
Imports of subject merchandise are
currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings
7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.1
Methodology
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AGENCY:
The period of review (POR) is April 1,
2015, through March 31, 2016. The
review covers two mandatory
respondents, Guangdong Dongyuan
Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd.
(Dongyuan) and Guangdong Yingao
Kitchen Utensils Co. Ltd (Yingao). We
preliminarily determine that sales of
subject merchandise by both
respondents have been made at prices
below normal value (NV). We also
preliminarily grant separate rates to ten
companies, which demonstrated
eligibility for separate rate status, but
were not selected for individual
examination. Finally, we preliminarily
find that New Shichu Import and Export
Company Limited (New Sichu) made no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Effective May 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova or Rebecca Janz,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280
and (202) 482–2972, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For the mandatory
respondents Dongyuan and Yingao,
export price and constructed export
price were calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. Because the
PRC is a non-market economy (NME)
within the meaning of section 771(18) of
the Act, NV was calculated in
accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act.
1 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum
for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ issued
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
A list of topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
provided as an appendix to this notice.
Separate Rates
We preliminarily determine that
information placed on the record by the
mandatory respondents, as well as by
the following ten companies which
were not selected for individual
examination, demonstrated eligibility
for separate rate status: Feidong Import
and Export Co., Ltd.; Ningbo Afa
Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.; Xinhe
Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.;
KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Inc.;
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.;
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise
Ltd.; Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.;
Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom
Products Co., Ltd.; B&R Industries
Limited; and Zhongshan Superte
Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
On July 5, 2016, New Shichu
submitted a timely-filed certification
that they had no exports, sales, or
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR.2 Additionally, our inquiry to
CBP did not identify any POR entries of
New Shichu’s subject merchandise.
Based on the foregoing, the Department
preliminarily determines that New
Shichu did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR. For
additional information regarding this
determination, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Consistent with our practice in NME
cases, the Department is not rescinding
this administrative review for New
Shichu, but intends to complete the
2 See letter from New Shichu, ‘‘Drawn Stainless
Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of China
Separate Rate Certification and Provisional No Sales
Certification,’’ dated July 5, 2016.
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21189-21192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09140]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-932]
Certain Steel Threaded Rod From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, in Part; 2015-
2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) preliminarily
determines that mandatory respondent Zhejiang New Oriental Fastener
Co., Ltd. (New Oriental), does not qualify for a separate rate and is,
therefore, considered a part of the People's Republic of China (PRC)-
wide entity for its exports of subject merchandise exported to the
United States during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2015, through
March 31, 2016. We also preliminarily find that mandatory respondent
IFI & Morgan Ltd. and RMB Fasteners Ltd. (RMB/IFI Group), did not have
any reviewable transactions during the POR. If these preliminary
results are adopted in the final results, the Department will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties
(AD) on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective May 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Renkey or Courtney Canales,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2312 or (202)
482-4997, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2016, the Department published in the Federal Register
the notice of initiation of an administrative review of the AD order on
certain steel threaded rod (STR) from the PRC for the period of review
April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. The Department initiated a
review with respect to 117 companies.\1\ Subsequently, on September 12,
2016, the Department published in the Federal Register a correction to
the Initiation Notice, adding an additional three companies.\2\ The
Department selected two mandatory respondents, New Oriental and RMB/IFI
Group, based on highest volume of exports.\3\ Between September 6,
2016, and April 5, 2017, the Department requested and received
information from the RMB/IFI Group pertaining to RMB/IFI Group's claim
of no shipments, and also received comments from Petitioner \4\ about
this issue. The other mandatory respondent, New Oriental, did not
respond to the Department's AD questionnaire. Tianjin Port Free Trade
Zone Tianjin Star International Trade Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Star),
submitted a separate rate application, and requested to be a mandatory
or voluntary respondent, but it never responded to the Department's AD
questionnaire. On September 21, 2016, the petitioner withdrew its
request for review for 115 companies.\5\ However, the petitioner did
not withdraw its request for review on New Oriental, RMB/IFI Group,
Tianjin Star, Zhejiang Heiter Industries Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Heiter
Industries), and Zhejiang Heiter Mfg & Trade Co. Ltd. (Zhejiang Heiter
Mfg).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 36272 (June 6, 2016) (Initiation
Notice). The Initiation Notice inaccurately stated the period of
review, which was corrected in a notice published on July 7, 2016.
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 81 FR 44260, 44265 (July 7, 2016).
\2\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 62726 dated September 12,
2016.
\3\ See Respondent Selection Memo dated August 29, 2016.
\4\ Vulcan Threaded Products Inc. (Vulcan) (the petitioner).
\5\ See the petitioner'submission dated September 21, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order includes steel threaded rod.
The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under subheading
7318.15.5051, 7318.15.5056, 7318.15.5090, and 7318.15.2095 of the
United States Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For a full description of the scope of the Order, see
Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary,
AD/CVD Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled, ``Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China: Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2015-2016 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review, In Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, ``in whole or in part, if a party that requested
a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the requested review.''
Petitioner timely withdrew its review requests with respect to 115
companies. Because we received no other requests for review of these
115 companies,\7\ we are rescinding the administrative review with
respect to all companies except New Oriental, RMB/IFI Group, Tianjin
Star, Zhejiang Heiter Industries and Zhejiang Heiter Mfg, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Appendix II for the list of companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Shipments
On July 5, 2016, RMB/IFI Group filed a no-shipment certification
indicating that it did not export subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR. During the course of this review, the Department
examined this no shipments claim and provides its analysis in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Based on the record evidence, we preliminarily determine that RMB/
IFI Group did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. In
addition, we find that it is appropriate not to rescind the review, in
part, in this circumstance, and to complete the review with respect to
the above-named company, issuing appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of the review.\8\ Should evidence contrary to RMB/
IFI's no-shipments claims arise, we will address the issue in
accordance with our governing statute and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-65695 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
[[Page 21190]]
Because New Oriental did not respond to our AD questionnaire, including
Section A, which requests its separate rate information, we
preliminarily find that New Oriental has not demonstrated its
eligibility for a separate rate, and accordingly, we are preliminarily
treating New Oriental as part of the PRC-wide entity. In addition,
because neither Zhejiang Heiter Industries nor Zhejiang Heiter Mfg
submitted a separate rate application, we are also preliminarily
treating both companies as part of the PRC-wide entity. We also
preliminarily determine that Tianjin Star is eligible for a separate
rate.
The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to respondents not selected for
individual examination when the Department limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act.
Generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for respondents
which we did not individually examine in an administrative review.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act articulates a preference that we not
calculate an all-others rate using rates which are zero, de minimis or
based entirely on facts available. When the weighted-average dumping
margins established for all individually investigated respondents are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act permits the Department to ``use any reasonable
method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and
producers not individually investigated, including averaging the
estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for the exporters
and producers individually investigated.'' Because New Oriental is part
of the PRC-wide entity, for which no review was requested, and RMB/IFI
Group did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR, there
are no calculated margins that are not zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available to consider in establishing a margin for
Tianjin Star. In the absence of any calculated rates in this segment,
to determine a non-selected rate for Tianjin Star in this review, we
have reached back to the calculated above-de minimis rate from the
immediately preceding administrative review. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A
list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period April 1, 2015,
through March 31, 2016:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Exporter/producer average
margins
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tianjin Port Free Trade Zone Tianjin Star International 5.40
Trade Co., Ltd.........................................
PRC-Wide Entity \9\..................................... 206.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The PRC-wide entity includes mandatory respondent New Oriental
Fastener Co., Ltd., as well as Zhejiang Heiter Industries and Zhejiang
Heiter Mfg. The rate for the PRC-Wide Entity was originally set in the
original investigation, see Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less than
Fair Value, 74 FR 8907 (February 27, 2009). This rate has been used in
each subsequent administrative review in which there was party being
considered as part of the PRC-Wide Entity.
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with its preliminary results
within five days of its public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the
Department is not calculating a weighted-average dumping margin for
either of the mandatory respondents selected for individual
examination, there are no calculations to disclose.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than 30
days after the date of publication of the preliminary determination,
unless the Secretary alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days
after the deadline date for case briefs.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this investigation are encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain
the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of
participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list
of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230, at a
time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the
date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled
date.
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis
of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication
of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
[[Page 21191]]
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review.\11\ The Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final
results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For any individually examined respondent whose weighted average
dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final
results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total
entered value of sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where
an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is greater than de
minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation.\12\ Where either a respondent's
weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-
(or customer-) specific ad valorem is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above
that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that
established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is
zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-Wide entity (i.e., 206
percent); and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This preliminary determination is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 1, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
a. Partial Rescission
b. No Shipments
c. NME Country Status
d. Separate Rates
e. Companies Considered as Part of the PRC-Wide Entity
5. Recommendation
Appendix II
List of Companies for Which Petitioner Has Withdrawn Its Request for
Administrative Review
1. Aerospace Precision Corp. (Shanghai) Industry Co., Ltd.
2. Aihua Holding Group Co. Ltd.
3. Autocraft Industry (Shanghai) Ltd.
4. Autocraft Industry Ltd.
5. Billion Land Ltd.
6. Billiongold Hardware Co. Ltd.
7. Bolt MFG. Trade Ltd.
8. Brighton Best International (Taiwan) Inc.
9. Brother Holding Group Co. Ltd.
10. C and H International Corporation
11. Certified Products International Inc.
12. Changshu City Standard Parts Factory
13. China Friendly Nation Hardware Technology Limited
14. D.M.D. International Co. Ltd.
15. Dongxiang Accuracy Hardware Co., Ltd.
16. EC International (Nantong) Co., Ltd.
17. Fastco (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd.
18. Fasten International Co., Ltd.
19. Fastwell Industry Co. Ltd.
20. Fook Shing Bolts & Nuts Co. Ltd.
21. Fuda Xiongzhen Macyinery Co., Ltd.
22. Fuller Shanghai Co Ltd.
23. Gem-Year Industrial Co. Ltd.
24. Guangdong Honjinn Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd.
25. Hainan Zhongyan United Development Co.
26. Hainan Zhongda Fastener Co., Ltd.
27. Haiyan Chaqqiang Standard Fasterner
28. Haiyan Dayu Fasterners Co., Ltd.
29. Haiyan Evergreen Standard Parts Co. Ltd.
30. Haiyan Fuxin High Strength Fasterner
31. Haiyan Hurras Import & Export Co. Ltd.
32. Haiyan Jianhe Hardward Co. Ltd.
33. Haiyan Julong Standard Part Co. Ltd.
34. Haiyan Yuxing Nuts Co. Ltd.
35. Hangzhou Everbright Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd.
36. Hangzhou Grand Imp & Exp. Co., Ltd.
37. Hangzhou Great Imp & Exp. Co. Ltd.
38. Hangzhou Lizhan Hardware Co. Ltd.
39. Hangzhou Tongwang Machinery Co., Ltd.
40. Hong Kong Sunrise Fasteners Co. Ltd.
41. Hong Kong Yichen Co. Ltd.
42. Jiangsu Zhongweiyu Communication Equipment Co. Ltd.
43. Jiashan Steelfit Trading Co. Ltd.
44. Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd.
45. Jiaxing Jinhow Import & Export Co., Ltd.
46. Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co. Ltd.
47. Jiaxing Yaoliang Import & Export Co., Ltd.
48. Jinan Banghe Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
49. King Socket Screw Company Ltd.
50. L&W Fasteners Company
51. Macropower Industrial Inc.
52. Mai Seng International Trading Co., Ltd.
53. MB Services Company
54. Midas Union Co., Ltd.
55. Nanjing Prosper Import & Export Corporation Ltd.
56. New Pole Power System Co. Ltd.
57. Ningbiao Bolts & Nuts Manufacturing Co.
58. Ningbo Beilun Milfast Metalworks Co. Ltd.
59. Ningbo Beilun Pingxin Hardware Co., Ltd.
60. Ningbo Dexin Fastener Co. Ltd.
61. Ningbo Dongxin High-Strength Nut Co., Ltd.
62. Ningbo Fastener Factory
63. Ningbo Fengya Imp. and Exp. Co. Ltd.
64. Ningbo Fourway Co., Ltd.
65. Ningbo Haishu Holy Hardware Import and Export Co. Ltd.
66. Ningbo Haishu Wit Import & Export Co. Ltd.
67. Ningbo Haishu Yixie Import & Export Co. Ltd.
68. Ningbo Jinding Fastening Pieces Co., Ltd.
69. Ningbo MPF Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
70. Ningbo Panxiang Imp. & Exp., Co. Ltd.
71. Ningbo Qianjiu Instrument Case Factory
72. Ningbo Yili Import & Export Co., Ltd.
73. Ningbo Yinzhou Dongxiang Accuarcy Hardware Co., Ltd.
74. Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.
75. Ningbo Yinzhou Woafan Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
76. Ningbo Zhendai Dingli Fasterner Screw Co., Ltd.
77. Ningbo Zhenghai Yongding Fastener Co., Ltd.
78. Ningbo Zhongjiang High Strength Bolts Co. Ltd.
79. Ningbo Zhongjiang Petroleum Pipes & Machinery Co., Ltd.
80. Orient International Holding Shanghai Rongheng Intl Trading Co.
Ltd.
81. Pol Shin Fastener (Zhejiang) Co.
82. Prosper Business and Industry Co., Ltd.
[[Page 21192]]
83. Qingdao Free Trade Zone Health Intl.
84. Qingdao Top Steel Industrial Co. Ltd.
85. Shaanxi Succeed Trading Co., Ltd.
86. Shanghai Autocraft Co., Ltd.
87. Shanghai East Best Foreign Trade Co.
88. Shanghai East Best International Business Development Co., Ltd.
89. Shanghai Fortune International Co. Ltd.
90. Shanghai Furen International Trading
91. Shanghai Hunan Foreign Economic Co., Ltd.
92. Shanghai Jiabao Trade Development Co. Ltd.
93. Shanghai Nanshi Foreign Economic Co.
94. Shanghai Overseas International Trading Co. Ltd.
95. Shanghai Prime Machinery Co. Ltd.
96. Shanghai Printing & Dyeing and Knitting Mill
97. Shanghai Printing & Packaging Machinery Corp.
98. Shanghai Recky International Trading Co., Ltd.
99. Shanghai Sinotex United Corp. Ltd.
100. SRC Metal (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
101. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd.
102. Suzhou Henry International Trading Co., Ltd.
103. T and C Fastener Co. Ltd.
104. T and L Industry Co. Ltd.
105. Wisechain Trading Limited
106. Wuxi Metec Metal Co. Ltd.
107. Zhejiang Heirrmu Mechanical and Electrical Equipment
Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
108. Zhejiang Jin Zeen Fasteners Co. Ltd.
109. Zhejiang Junyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.
110. Zhejiang Laibao Precision Technology Co. Ltd.
111. Zhejiang Metals & Minerals Imp & Exp Co. Ltd.
112. Zhejiang Morgan Brother Technology Co. Ltd.
113. Zhejiang New Century Imp & Exp Co. Ltd.
114. Zhejiang Zhenglian Industry Development Co., Ltd.
115. Zhoushan Zhengyuan Standard Parts Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2017-09140 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
