Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan Engines, 21111-21114 [2017-09039]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the applicant apply
for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model included on the
same type certificate to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also
apply to the other model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 737–700
airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 737–700 airplane,
as changed, will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
features:
The installation of a supplemental
therapeutic oxygen system, for medical
use, in a private, not-for-hire, not-forcommon-carriage airplane.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion
AMAC has applied to modify a
private business jet, a Boeing 737–700
airplane, to include an oxygen supply
for a dedicated medical-oxygen system.
The gaseous passenger-oxygen system
will be modified to include additional
supply cylinders and several
therapeutic oxygen outlets located
throughout the airplane cabin. Each
therapeutic outlet will provide a
constant flow of oxygen at either 2 or 4
liters per minute.
The flightcrew controls the flow of
therapeutic oxygen at all times during
flight. Therapeutic oxygen systems have
been previously certified and were
generally considered an extension of the
passenger-oxygen system for the
purpose of defining the applicable
regulations. As a result, the applicable
regulations included those that applied
to oxygen systems in general, or
supplemental oxygen systems.
Section 25.1445 includes standards
for oxygen-distribution systems when
oxygen is supplied to crew and
passengers. If a common source of
supply is used, § 25.1445(a)(2) requires
a means to separately reserve the
minimum supply required for the
flightcrew. This requirement was
originally added to Civil Air Regulation
(CAR) 4b.831 at amendment 4b–13,
effective September 21, 1949, and was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
included in § 25.1445 when the
regulations were codified.
The regulation is intended to protect
the flightcrew by ensuring that an
adequate supply of oxygen is available
to complete a descent and land
following a loss of cabin pressure. When
the regulation was written, the only
passenger-oxygen system designs were
supplemental-oxygen systems intended
to protect passengers from hypoxia in
the event of cabin decompression.
Present designs of passenger-oxygen
systems do not include design features
that allow the crew to offer oxygen to
passengers during flight.
Furthermore, the potential hazard that
can exist when the oxygen content of an
enclosed area becomes too high because
of system leaks, malfunction, or damage
from external sources, make it necessary
to ensure that adequate safety standards
are applied to the design and
installation of the oxygen system. These
potential hazards also necessitate
development and application of
appropriate additional design and
installation standards.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Boeing
Model 737–700 airplane. Should AMAC
apply at a later date for a supplemental
type certificate to modify any other
model included on Type Certificate no.
A16WE to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of this feature on the airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the notice
and comment period in several prior
instances and has been derived without
substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21111
special conditions upon publication in
the Federal Register.
The FAA is requesting comments to
allow interested persons to submit
views that may not have been submitted
in response to the prior opportunities
for comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Boeing Model
737–700 airplanes as modified by
AMAC Aerospace Switzerland AG.
The distribution system for the
therapeutic-oxygen system must be
designed and installed to meet
requirements similar to § 25.1445(a) as
follows:
When oxygen is supplied to
passengers for both supplemental and
therapeutic purposes, the distribution
system must be designed for either—
1. A source of supplemental supply
for protection from hypoxia following a
loss of cabin pressure, and a separate
source for therapeutic purposes, or
2. A common source of supply, with
means to separately reserve the
minimum supply required by the
passengers for supplemental use
following a loss of cabin pressure.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 27,
2017.
Paul Bernado,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–09173 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0165; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NE–02–AD; Amendment 39–
18868; AD 2017–09–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
21112
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2015–15–
03 for all General Electric Company (GE)
GEnx turbofan engine models. AD
2015–15–03 precluded the use of certain
electronic engine control (EEC) full
authority digital engine control (FADEC)
software on GEnx turbofan engines. This
AD requires removing a specific part
and replacing it with a part eligible for
installation and specifying the EEC
FADEC software version for the affected
GEnx turbofan engines. This AD was
prompted by GE implementing final
design changes that remove the unsafe
condition. We are issuing this AD to
correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
General Electric Company, GE Aviation,
Room 285, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati,
OH 45215; phone: 513–552–3272; email:
geae.aoc@ge.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
SUMMARY:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0165; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher McGuire, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7120; fax: 781–
238–7199; email: chris.mcguire@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2015–15–03,
Amendment 39–18212 (80 FR 42707,
July 20, 2015), (‘‘AD 2015–15–03’’). AD
2015–15–03 applied to all GE GEnx
turbofan engine models. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
November 3, 2016 (81 FR 76540). The
NPRM was prompted by GE
implementing final design changes that
remove the unsafe condition. The
NPRM proposed to remove a specific
part and replace it with a part eligible
for installation and specify the EEC
FADEC software version for the affected
GEnx turbofan engines. We are issuing
this AD to prevent engine failure, loss
of thrust control, and damage to the
airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Change Compliance
The Boeing Company and GE
requested that we amend paragraph (f)
to clarify which software versions are
prohibited from being installed. They
stated that the listed software versions
do not contain the highest level of ice
crystal icing (ICI) accommodation.
We agree. We revised this AD because
the listed software versions do not
contain the highest level of ICI
accommodation features. Also, the
change requested makes the prohibition
statement consistent with the AD
removal requirements.
Request To Add Terminating Action
The Boeing Company requested that
we add compliance to this AD as a
terminating action to AD 2013–24–01,
Amendment 39–17675 (78 FR 70851,
November 27, 2013), (‘‘AD 2013–24–
01’’) since it removes the unsafe
condition.
We partially agree. We agree that
complying with this AD is terminating
action for certain requirements of AD
2013–24–01. Therefore, we added a new
terminating action paragraph (h) of this
AD. Since complying with this AD is
terminating action to certain
requirements of AD 2013–24–01, we
disagree that complying with this AD is
terminating action for all requirements
of AD 2013–24–01.
Request To Add Terminating Action
The Boeing Company requests that
747–8 and 747–8F aircraft with GEnx–
2B engines that are operating with
software, version C075, be granted a
relaxation of the requirements in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of AD 2013–24–
01. They stated that an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) exists
that grants a relaxation of the
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h)
of AD 2013–24–01 as long as the aircraft
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
engines have the required software
versions.
We disagree. Although Transport
Airplane Directorate issued aircraft level
AD 2013–24–01 and granted an AMOC,
those are interim actions. Complying
with this AD is required to remove the
unsafe condition and is terminating
action to certain requirements of AD
2013–24–01. We did not change this
AD.
Request To Revise a Definition
GE requested that we revise the
definition of an engine shop visit. They
suggested that we add ‘‘Workscopes
involving only externals, including
transfer gearbox (TGB) and accessory
gearbox (AGB) do not constitute an
engine shop visit for the purpose of this
AD.’’
We disagree. The definition of a shop
visit as ‘‘the induction of an engine into
the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating
engine case flanges’’ is a standard
industry definition. Workscopes
involving the TGB/AGB, or externals, do
not separate major mating engine case
flanges and do not constitute an engine
shop visit for the purpose of this AD.
We did not change this AD.
Request To Change Compliance Time
Cathay Pacific Airways Limited
requested that we clarify which parts
may be installed into the engine.
We disagree. The FAA does not
intend to specify which parts may be
installed into the engine, only those
parts that may not be installed into the
engine. Specifying which parts are
eligible for installation may
inadvertently prohibit new parts that are
introduced from being installed into the
engine. We did not change this AD.
Agreement With the Proposed AD
The Air Line Pilots Association
expressed agreement with this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that the changes we
made as the result of the comments we
received:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Related Service Information
We reviewed GE GEnx–2B Service
Bulletin (SB) 72–0241 R00, dated March
16, 2016 that describes removal and
installation procedures of fan hub stator
assembly booster outlet guide vane; GE
GEnx–2B SB 73–0041 R00, dated July 2,
2015 that describes reprogramming
procedures for EEC FADEC software,
version C075; and GE GEnx–1B SB 73–
0044 R00, dated July 1, 2015 that
describes reprograming procedures for
EEC FADEC software, version B185.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 130
engines installed on airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate that it would take
about 1 hour per engine to comply with
the software installation required by this
AD. We also estimate that 32 engines
would require hardware replacement,
which would take about 60 hours per
engine. Required parts cost about
$390,000 per engine. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
on U.S. operators to be $12,654,250.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2015–15–03, Amendment 39–18212 (80
FR 42707, July 20, 2015), and adding the
following new AD:
■
2017–09–06: General Electric Company:
Amendment 39–18868; Docket No.
FAA–2015–0165; Directorate Identifier
2015–NE–02–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective June 9, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2015–15–03,
Amendment 39–18212 (80 FR 42707, July 20,
2015). This AD also affects AD 2013–24–01,
Amendment 39–17675 (78 FR 70851,
November 27, 2013).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all General Electric
Company (GE) GEnx–1B and GEnx–2B
turbofan engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by GE
implementing final design changes that
remove the unsafe condition. We are issuing
this AD to prevent engine failure, loss of
thrust control, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(1) Thirty days after the effective date of
this AD, do not operate any GE GEnx–1B
engine with electronic engine control (EEC)
full authority digital engine control (FADEC)
software, version B180 or earlier, installed.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21113
(2) Thirty days after the effective date of
this AD, do not operate any GE GEnx–2B
engine with EEC FADEC software, version
C068 or earlier, installed.
(3) At the next shop visit after the effective
date of this AD, remove from service all GE
GEnx–2B67, –2B67B, and –2B67/P fan hub
stator assembly booster outlet guide vanes,
part number B1316–00720, and replace with
a part eligible for installation.
(f) Installation Prohibition
After removing any software, version B180
or earlier, for the GE GEnx–1B engines; or
software, version C068 or earlier, for the GE
GEnx–2B engines, do not operate those
engines with any software, version B180 or
C068, or earlier.
(g) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, an ‘‘engine
shop visit’’ is the induction of an engine into
the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine
case flanges, except for the following
situations which do not constitute an engine
shop visit:
(1) Separation of engine flanges solely for
the purposes of transportation without
subsequent maintenance does not constitute
an engine shop visit.
(2) Separation of engine flanges solely for
the purpose of replacing the fan or propulsor
without subsequent maintenance does not
constitute an engine shop visit.
(h) Terminating Action
Compliance with this AD, for all engines
installed on a specific airplane, is a
terminating action to AD 2013–24–01 for that
specific airplane, since it removes the unsafe
condition on that specific airplane.
(1) For GEnx–1B engines:
(i) Compliance with paragraphs (e)(1) and
(f) of this AD, for all engines on an airplane,
is an approved terminating action for that
airplane for paragraphs (g) and (i) of AD
2013–24–01.
(ii) Note that paragraph (j) of AD 2013–24–
01, which contains post-event inspection
requirements, remains in force.
(2) For GEnx–2B engines:
(i) Compliance with paragraphs (e)(2),
(e)(3), and (f) of this AD, for all engines on
an airplane, is an approved terminating
action for that airplane for paragraphs (g) and
(h) of AD 2013–24–01.
(ii) Note that paragraph (j) of AD 2013–24–
01, which contains post-event inspection
requirements, remains in force.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Christopher McGuire, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–
238–7120; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
chris.mcguire@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
21114
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(2) GE GEnx–2B Service Bulletin (SB) 72–
0241 R00, dated March 16, 2016; GE GEnx–
2B SB 73–0041 R00, dated July 2, 2015; and
GE GEnx–1B SB 73–0044 R00, dated July 1,
2015 can be obtained from GE, using the
contact information in paragraph (j)(3) of this
AD.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact General Electric Company,
GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 513–552–3272;
email: geae.aoc@ge.com.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
April 27, 2017.
Robert J. Ganley,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–09039 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 97
[Docket No. 31130; Amdt. No. 3743]
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures;
Miscellaneous Amendments
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule establishes, amends,
suspends, or removes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures (ODPs) for operations at
certain airports. These regulatory
actions are needed because of the
adoption of new or revised criteria, or
because of changes occurring in the
National Airspace System, such as the
commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or
changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide safe
and efficient use of the navigable
airspace and to promote safe flight
operations under instrument flight rules
at the affected airports.
DATES: This rule is effective May 5,
2017. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Registe as of May 5, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Availability of matters
incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
For Examination
1. U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Ops–M30, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Bldg., Ground Floor,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization
Service Area in which the affected
airport is located;
3. The office of Aeronautical
Navigation Products, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK
73169 or,
4. The National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Availability
All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are available online free of charge.
Visit the National Flight Data Center at
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally,
individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP copies may be obtained from
the FAA Air Traffic Organization
Service Area in which the affected
airport is located.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight
Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City,
OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
amends Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by
establishing, amending, suspending, or
removes SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums
and/or ODPS. The complete regulatory
description of each SIAP and its
associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP
for an identified airport is listed on FAA
form documents which are incorporated
by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14
CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
forms are FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–4,
8260–5, 8260–15A, and 8260–15B when
required by an entry on 8260–15A.
The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, their complex
nature, and the need for a special format
make publication in the Federal
Register expensive and impractical.
Further, airmen do not use the
regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to
their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical
materials. Thus, the advantages of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
incorporation by reference are realized
and publication of the complete
description of each SIAP, Takeoff
Minimums and ODP listed on FAA form
documents is unnecessary. This
amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs
with their applicable effective dates.
This amendment also identifies the
airport and its location, the procedure,
and the amendment number.
Availability and Summary of Material
Incorporated by Reference
The material incorporated by
reference is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section.
The material incorporated by
reference describes SIAPS, Takeoff
Minimums and/or ODPS as identified in
the amendatory language for part 97 of
this final rule.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is
effective upon publication of each
separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and
ODP as Amended in the transmittal.
Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and
textual ODP amendments may have
been issued previously by the FAA in a
Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice to
Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating
directly to published aeronautical
charts.
The circumstances that created the
need for some SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments may
require making them effective in less
than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPs
and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after
publication is provided.
Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these SIAPs and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the
TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the
affected airports. Because of the close
and immediate relationship between
these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under
5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and
contrary to the public interest and,
where applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
good cause exists for making some
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21111-21114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0165; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-02-AD;
Amendment 39-18868; AD 2017-09-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 21112]]
SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2015-15-03 for
all General Electric Company (GE) GEnx turbofan engine models. AD 2015-
15-03 precluded the use of certain electronic engine control (EEC) full
authority digital engine control (FADEC) software on GEnx turbofan
engines. This AD requires removing a specific part and replacing it
with a part eligible for installation and specifying the EEC FADEC
software version for the affected GEnx turbofan engines. This AD was
prompted by GE implementing final design changes that remove the unsafe
condition. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact General Electric Company, GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 513-552-3272; email: geae.aoc@ge.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0165; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher McGuire, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-
238-7120; fax: 781-238-7199; email: chris.mcguire@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2015-15-03, Amendment 39-18212 (80 FR 42707,
July 20, 2015), (``AD 2015-15-03''). AD 2015-15-03 applied to all GE
GEnx turbofan engine models. The NPRM published in the Federal Register
on November 3, 2016 (81 FR 76540). The NPRM was prompted by GE
implementing final design changes that remove the unsafe condition. The
NPRM proposed to remove a specific part and replace it with a part
eligible for installation and specify the EEC FADEC software version
for the affected GEnx turbofan engines. We are issuing this AD to
prevent engine failure, loss of thrust control, and damage to the
airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Change Compliance
The Boeing Company and GE requested that we amend paragraph (f) to
clarify which software versions are prohibited from being installed.
They stated that the listed software versions do not contain the
highest level of ice crystal icing (ICI) accommodation.
We agree. We revised this AD because the listed software versions
do not contain the highest level of ICI accommodation features. Also,
the change requested makes the prohibition statement consistent with
the AD removal requirements.
Request To Add Terminating Action
The Boeing Company requested that we add compliance to this AD as a
terminating action to AD 2013-24-01, Amendment 39-17675 (78 FR 70851,
November 27, 2013), (``AD 2013-24-01'') since it removes the unsafe
condition.
We partially agree. We agree that complying with this AD is
terminating action for certain requirements of AD 2013-24-01.
Therefore, we added a new terminating action paragraph (h) of this AD.
Since complying with this AD is terminating action to certain
requirements of AD 2013-24-01, we disagree that complying with this AD
is terminating action for all requirements of AD 2013-24-01.
Request To Add Terminating Action
The Boeing Company requests that 747-8 and 747-8F aircraft with
GEnx-2B engines that are operating with software, version C075, be
granted a relaxation of the requirements in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
AD 2013-24-01. They stated that an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) exists that grants a relaxation of the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of AD 2013-24-01 as long as the aircraft engines
have the required software versions.
We disagree. Although Transport Airplane Directorate issued
aircraft level AD 2013-24-01 and granted an AMOC, those are interim
actions. Complying with this AD is required to remove the unsafe
condition and is terminating action to certain requirements of AD 2013-
24-01. We did not change this AD.
Request To Revise a Definition
GE requested that we revise the definition of an engine shop visit.
They suggested that we add ``Workscopes involving only externals,
including transfer gearbox (TGB) and accessory gearbox (AGB) do not
constitute an engine shop visit for the purpose of this AD.''
We disagree. The definition of a shop visit as ``the induction of
an engine into the shop for maintenance involving the separation of
pairs of major mating engine case flanges'' is a standard industry
definition. Workscopes involving the TGB/AGB, or externals, do not
separate major mating engine case flanges and do not constitute an
engine shop visit for the purpose of this AD. We did not change this
AD.
Request To Change Compliance Time
Cathay Pacific Airways Limited requested that we clarify which
parts may be installed into the engine.
We disagree. The FAA does not intend to specify which parts may be
installed into the engine, only those parts that may not be installed
into the engine. Specifying which parts are eligible for installation
may inadvertently prohibit new parts that are introduced from being
installed into the engine. We did not change this AD.
Agreement With the Proposed AD
The Air Line Pilots Association expressed agreement with this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously. We determined that the
changes we made as the result of the comments we received:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic
[[Page 21113]]
burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information
We reviewed GE GEnx-2B Service Bulletin (SB) 72-0241 R00, dated
March 16, 2016 that describes removal and installation procedures of
fan hub stator assembly booster outlet guide vane; GE GEnx-2B SB 73-
0041 R00, dated July 2, 2015 that describes reprogramming procedures
for EEC FADEC software, version C075; and GE GEnx-1B SB 73-0044 R00,
dated July 1, 2015 that describes reprograming procedures for EEC FADEC
software, version B185.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 130 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry. We estimate that it would take about 1 hour per
engine to comply with the software installation required by this AD. We
also estimate that 32 engines would require hardware replacement, which
would take about 60 hours per engine. Required parts cost about
$390,000 per engine. The average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be
$12,654,250.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2015-15-03, Amendment 39-18212 (80 FR 42707, July 20, 2015), and adding
the following new AD:
2017-09-06: General Electric Company: Amendment 39-18868; Docket No.
FAA-2015-0165; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-02-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective June 9, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2015-15-03, Amendment 39-18212 (80 FR 42707,
July 20, 2015). This AD also affects AD 2013-24-01, Amendment 39-
17675 (78 FR 70851, November 27, 2013).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all General Electric Company (GE) GEnx-1B and
GEnx-2B turbofan engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by GE implementing final design changes
that remove the unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to prevent
engine failure, loss of thrust control, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(1) Thirty days after the effective date of this AD, do not
operate any GE GEnx-1B engine with electronic engine control (EEC)
full authority digital engine control (FADEC) software, version B180
or earlier, installed.
(2) Thirty days after the effective date of this AD, do not
operate any GE GEnx-2B engine with EEC FADEC software, version C068
or earlier, installed.
(3) At the next shop visit after the effective date of this AD,
remove from service all GE GEnx-2B67, -2B67B, and -2B67/P fan hub
stator assembly booster outlet guide vanes, part number B1316-00720,
and replace with a part eligible for installation.
(f) Installation Prohibition
After removing any software, version B180 or earlier, for the GE
GEnx-1B engines; or software, version C068 or earlier, for the GE
GEnx-2B engines, do not operate those engines with any software,
version B180 or C068, or earlier.
(g) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, an ``engine shop visit'' is the
induction of an engine into the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine case flanges, except for
the following situations which do not constitute an engine shop
visit:
(1) Separation of engine flanges solely for the purposes of
transportation without subsequent maintenance does not constitute an
engine shop visit.
(2) Separation of engine flanges solely for the purpose of
replacing the fan or propulsor without subsequent maintenance does
not constitute an engine shop visit.
(h) Terminating Action
Compliance with this AD, for all engines installed on a specific
airplane, is a terminating action to AD 2013-24-01 for that specific
airplane, since it removes the unsafe condition on that specific
airplane.
(1) For GEnx-1B engines:
(i) Compliance with paragraphs (e)(1) and (f) of this AD, for
all engines on an airplane, is an approved terminating action for
that airplane for paragraphs (g) and (i) of AD 2013-24-01.
(ii) Note that paragraph (j) of AD 2013-24-01, which contains
post-event inspection requirements, remains in force.
(2) For GEnx-2B engines:
(i) Compliance with paragraphs (e)(2), (e)(3), and (f) of this
AD, for all engines on an airplane, is an approved terminating
action for that airplane for paragraphs (g) and (h) of AD 2013-24-
01.
(ii) Note that paragraph (j) of AD 2013-24-01, which contains
post-event inspection requirements, remains in force.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Christopher
McGuire, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781-238-7120; fax: 781-238-7199; email:
chris.mcguire@faa.gov.
[[Page 21114]]
(2) GE GEnx-2B Service Bulletin (SB) 72-0241 R00, dated March
16, 2016; GE GEnx-2B SB 73-0041 R00, dated July 2, 2015; and GE
GEnx-1B SB 73-0044 R00, dated July 1, 2015 can be obtained from GE,
using the contact information in paragraph (j)(3) of this AD.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
General Electric Company, GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 513-552-3272; email: geae.aoc@ge.com.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on April 27, 2017.
Robert J. Ganley,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-09039 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P