Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Correction, 21123-21124 [2017-09028]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(i) In the case of a Camp Lejeune
family member who resided at Camp
Lejeune between January 1, 1957, and
December 31, 1987, for hospital care
and medical services received prior to
the date an application for benefits is
filed per paragraph (c) of this section,
the hospital care and medical services
must have been provided on or after
March 26, 2013, but no more than 2
years prior to the date that VA receives
the application. The claim for payment
or reimbursement must be received by
VA no more than 60 days after VA
approves the application;
(ii) In the case of a Camp Lejeune
family member who resided at Camp
Lejeune between August 1, 1953, and
December 31, 1956, for hospital care
and medical services received prior to
the date an application for benefits is
filed per paragraph (c) of this section,
the hospital care and medical services
must have been provided on or after
December 16, 2014, but no more than 2
years prior to the date that VA receives
the application. The claim for payment
or reimbursement must be received by
VA no more than 60 days after VA
approves the application;
(iii) For hospital care and medical
services provided on or after the date an
application for benefits is filed per
paragraph (c) of this section, the claim
for payment or reimbursement must be
received by VA no more than 2 years
after the later of either the date of
discharge from a hospital or the date
that medical services were rendered;
(2) The Camp Lejeune family
member’s treating physician certifies
that the claimed hospital care or
medical services were provided for a
covered illness or condition as defined
in § 17.400(b), and provides information
about any co-morbidities, risk factors, or
other exposures that may have
contributed to the illness or condition;
(3) VA makes the clinical finding,
under VA clinical practice guidelines,
that the illness or condition did not
result from a cause other than the
residence of the family member at Camp
Lejeune;
(4) VA would be authorized to
provide the claimed hospital care or
medical services to a veteran under
VA’s medical benefits package in
§ 17.38;
(5) The Camp Lejeune family member
or hospital care or medical service
provider has exhausted without success
all claims and remedies reasonably
available to the family member or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
provider against a third party, including
health-plan contracts; and
(6) Funds were appropriated to
implement 38 U.S.C. 1787 in a sufficient
amount to permit payment or
reimbursement.
(e) Payment or reimbursement
amounts. Payments or reimbursements
under this section will be in amounts
determined in accordance with this
paragraph (e).
(1) If a third party is partially liable
for the claimed hospital care or medical
services, then VA will pay or reimburse
the lesser of the amount for which the
Camp Lejeune family member remains
personally liable or the amount for
which VA would pay for such care
under §§ 17.55 and 17.56.
(2) If VA is the sole payer for hospital
care and medical services, then VA will
pay or reimburse in accordance with
§§ 17.55 and 17.56, as applicable.
(The information collection
requirements have been submitted to
OMB and are pending OMB approval.)
21123
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, 5 Post
Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, phone number
(617) 918–1653, fax number (617) 918–
0653, email McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA
issued a final rule in the Federal
Register on July 8, 2016 (81 FR 44542).
An error occurred in the amendatory
instructions to the table in 40 CFR
52.1520(e). The table entry for
‘‘Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 NO2
NAAQS’’ was unintentionally removed
and later restored. This corrective action
adds an entry for ‘‘Infrastructure SIP for
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS’’ to the table in
40 CFR 52.1520(e), as was originally
intended.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
40 CFR Part 52
Correction
[EPA–R01–OAR–2012–0950; FRL–9959–68–
Region 1]
In final rule FR Doc. 2016–15623,
published in the issue of Friday, July 8,
2016 (81 FR 44542), make the following
correction:
On page 44553, in the third column,
remove amendatory instruction 3.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is corrected
by making the following correcting
amendment:
[FR Doc. 2017–09163 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire;
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient
Air Quality Standards; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency, (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) published a final rule
approving a New Hampshire’s State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions
that addressed infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) in the Federal Register on
July 8, 2016. An error in the
nonregulatory table in New Hampshire’s
SIP is identified and corrected in this
action.
DATES: This rule is effective May 5,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida
E. McDonnell, Manager, Air Permits,
Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart EE—New Hampshire
2. In § 52.1520, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry
‘‘Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS’’ after the entry ‘‘Infrastructure
SIP for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.1520
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
*
*
21124
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
NEW HAMPSHIRE NON REGULATORY
Name of nonregulatory SIP
provision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment
area
State submittal
date/effective
date
*
*
Infrastructure SIP for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS.
*
Statewide ...................
*
9/13/2013
*
*
*
EPA approved date 3
Explanations
*
7/8/2016, 81 FR 44553 ....
*
*
Approved submittal, except for certain
aspects relating to PSD which were
conditionally approved. See 52.1519.
*
*
*
*
3 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
Division, Media Bureau,
Brendan.Holland@fcc.gov (202) 418–
2757.
[FR Doc. 2017–09028 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 13–236; FCC 17–40]
National Television Multiple Ownership
Rule
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
An Order on Reconsideration
reinstates the UHF discount, which
allows commercial broadcast television
station owners to discount the audience
reach of their UHF stations when
calculating compliance with the
national television ownership rule. With
the reinstatement of the discount, the
Commission will commence a
proceeding later this year to consider
whether the national television
audience reach cap, including the UHF
discount, remains in the public interest.
The Order on Reconsideration finds that
the UHF discount is inextricably linked
to the national cap, and when the
Commission voted previously to
eliminate the discount, it failed to
consider whether this de facto
tightening of the national cap was in the
public interest and justified by current
marketplace conditions. The Order on
Reconsideration grants in part the
Petition for Reconsideration (Petition)
filed by ION Media Networks and
Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana,
Inc. (Petitioners), and dismisses as moot
requests to reconsider the
grandfathering provisions applicable to
broadcast station combinations affected
by elimination of the discount and the
decision to forego a VHF discount.
DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brendan Holland, Industry Analysis
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 May 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Order on
Reconsideration in MB Docket No. 13–
236, FCC 17–40, adopted April 20, 2017,
and released April 21, 2017. The full
text of this document is available for
public inspection during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554, or online
at https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/
0426267477284. To request this
document in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (e.g. braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format, etc.) or to request reasonable
accommodations (e.g. accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.), send an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or call the FCC’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Synopsis
1. Background. In 1985, when the
Commission revised the national
television multiple ownership rule to
prohibit a single entity from owning
television stations that collectively
exceeded 25 percent of the total
nationwide audience, it also adopted a
50 percent UHF discount to reflect the
coverage limitations faced by analog
UHF stations. The discount was
intended to mitigate the competitive
disadvantage that UHF stations suffered
in comparison to VHF stations, as UHF
stations were technically inferior,
producing weaker over-the-air signals,
reaching smaller audiences, and costing
more to build and operate. This
technical inferiority, inherent in analog
television broadcasting, was significant
in 1985 because the vast majority of
viewers received programming from
broadcast television stations via overthe-air signals.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Eleven years later, in the
Telecommunications Act of 1996,
Congress directed the Commission to
increase the national audience reach cap
from 25 percent to 35 percent.
Subsequently, the Commission
reaffirmed the 35 percent national cap
in its 1998 Biennial Review Order. The
United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia later remanded the
1998 Biennial Review Order after
finding that the decision to retain the
national cap was arbitrary and
capricious. In addition, the court found
that the Commission failed to
demonstrate that the national cap
advanced competition, diversity, or
localism. In the 2002 Biennial Review
Order, the Commission determined the
cap should be raised to 45 percent. In
both of these Orders, the Commission
also considered and retained the UHF
discount.
3. Following adoption of the 2002
Biennial Review Order and while an
appeal of that order was pending,
Congress revised the cap by including a
provision in the 2004 Consolidated
Appropriations Act (CAA) directing the
Commission to modify its rules to set
the cap at 39 percent of national
television households. The CAA further
amended Section 202(h) of the 1996 Act
to require a quadrennial review of the
Commission’s broadcast ownership
rules, rather than the previously
mandated biennial review. In doing so,
Congress excluded consideration of any
rules relating to the 39 percent national
audience reach limitation from the
quadrennial review requirement.
4. Prior to the enactment of the CAA,
several parties had appealed the
Commission’s 2002 Biennial Review
Order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Third Circuit (Third Circuit). In June
2004, the Third Circuit found that the
challenges to the Commission’s actions
with respect to the national audience
reach cap and the UHF discount were
moot as a result of Congress’s action.
Specifically, the court held that the
CAA rendered moot the challenges to
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21123-21124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09028]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2012-0950; FRL-9959-68-Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Infrastructure Requirements for
the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards;
Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final
rule approving a New Hampshire's State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submissions that addressed infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act) for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the Federal Register on July
8, 2016. An error in the nonregulatory table in New Hampshire's SIP is
identified and corrected in this action.
DATES: This rule is effective May 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida E. McDonnell, Manager, Air
Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05-2), Boston, MA
02109-3912, phone number (617) 918-1653, fax number (617) 918-0653,
email McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a final rule in the Federal
Register on July 8, 2016 (81 FR 44542). An error occurred in the
amendatory instructions to the table in 40 CFR 52.1520(e). The table
entry for ``Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS'' was
unintentionally removed and later restored. This corrective action adds
an entry for ``Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS''
to the table in 40 CFR 52.1520(e), as was originally intended.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: March 16, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Correction
In final rule FR Doc. 2016-15623, published in the issue of Friday,
July 8, 2016 (81 FR 44542), make the following correction:
On page 44553, in the third column, remove amendatory instruction
3.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is corrected by making the following correcting amendment:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart EE--New Hampshire
0
2. In Sec. 52.1520, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding
the entry ``Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS''
after the entry ``Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 21124]]
New Hampshire Non Regulatory
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of nonregulatory SIP Applicable geographic or submittal date/ EPA approved date \3\ Explanations
provision nonattainment area effective date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Infrastructure SIP for the 2010 Statewide....................... 9/13/2013 7/8/2016, 81 FR 44553................. Approved submittal, except
SO2 NAAQS. for certain aspects
relating to PSD which
were conditionally
approved. See 52.1519.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column
for the particular provision.
[FR Doc. 2017-09028 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
