Bonding Requirements for Recipients, 20555-20558 [2017-08857]
Download as PDF
20555
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
September 15, 2016. FAA Order
7400.11A is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 by amending Class D
airspace, Class E airspace designated as
an extension, and Class E Airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at W.K. Kellogg Airport
(formerly W.K. Kellogg Field), Battle
Creek, MI.
The airport name change to W.K.
Kellogg Airport from W.K. Kellogg Field
and the airport’s geographic coordinates
would be amended in the associated
Class D and Class E airspace listed in
this proposal.
Class E extension area airspace would
be amended by removing the Battle
Creek VORTAC from the airspace
description due to its decommissioning.
Also, Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
would be amended by removing the
southwest segment, and the segment 7
miles northwest and 4.4 miles southeast
of the Battle Creek ILS localizer
northeast course extending 10.4 miles
northeast of the localizer outer marker/
nondirectional radio beacon. The
northeast segment would be amended to
within 2 miles each side of the 047°
bearing (from 4 miles each side of the
049° bearing) from the airport extending
from 7-mile radius of the airport to 10
miles northeast (from 10.9 miles) of the
airport, and southeast segment would be
amended to within 2 miles each side of
the 126° bearing from the airport
extending from the 7-mile radius to 7.4
miles (from 11.1 miles) southeast of the
airport. This action would enhance the
safety and management of the standard
instrument approach procedures for IFR
operations at the airport. Additionally,
this action would amend Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface by removing
reference to the BATOL navigation aid
and Battle Creek ILS localizer. This
action would enhance the safety and
management of the standard instrument
approach procedures for IFR operations
at the airport.
Lastly, this action would replace the
outdated term Airport/Facility directory
with the term Chart Supplement.
Class D and E airspace designations
are published in paragraph 5000, 6004
and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, which is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:34 May 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace Areas.
AGL MI D Battle Creek, MI [Amended]
Battle Creek, W.K. Kellogg Airport, MI
(Lat. 42°18′23″ N., long. 85°15′00″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 3,500 feet MSL
within a 4.5-mile radius of W.K. Kellogg
Airport. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective dates and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as an Extension to a Class D or
Class E Surface Area.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL MI E4 Battle Creek, MI [Amended]
Battle Creek, W.K. Kellogg Airport, MI
(Lat. 42°18′23″ N., long. 85°15′00″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within the 4.5-mile radius of W.K.
Kellogg Airport. This Class E airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective dates and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL MI E5 Battle Creek, MI [Amended]
Battle Creek, W.K. Kellogg Airport, MI
(Lat. 42°18′23″ N., long. 85°15′00″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of W.K. Kellogg Airport, and within 2 miles
each side of the 047° bearing from the airport
extending from the 7-mile radius to 10 miles
northeast of the airport, and within 2 miles
each side of the 126° bearing from the airport
extending from the 7-mile radius to 7.4 miles
southeast of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on April 25,
2017.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2017–08856 Filed 5–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
§ 71.1
Bonding Requirements for Recipients
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, is
amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45 CFR Part 1629
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule would
revise the Legal Services Corporation’s
(LSC or Corporation) regulation about
bonding requirements for LSC
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
20556
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
recipients. It would require recipients to
bond all their employees and to ensure
that third parties who handle recipients’
funds have bond coverage, allow
recipients to use other forms of
insurance similar to fidelity bonds, raise
the minimum level of coverage, and
allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay
for bonding costs. This proposed rule
will update part 1629 to reflect current
insurance practices and simplify the
language in the rule to reduce
confusion.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: Follow
the instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: lscrulemaking@lsc.gov.
Include ‘‘Part 1629 Rulemaking’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 337–6519.
• Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services
Corporation, 3333 K Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part
1629 Rulemaking.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K.
Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street
NW., Washington, DC 20007, ATTN:
Part 1629 Rulemaking.
• Instructions: LSC prefers electronic
submissions via email with attachments
in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not
consider written comments sent to any
other address or received after the end
of the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC
20007; (202) 295–1563 (phone), (202)
337–6519 (fax), or sdavis@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Background
LSC created part 1629 in 1984 after
several instances in which recipients
lost LSC funds through the dishonest
behavior of persons associated with the
recipient. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984.
While the recipient recovered the funds
in some cases, in others, the recipient
had to absorb the loss. Id.
Before enacting part 1629, LSC
recommended that recipients have
fidelity coverage as a basic internal
control. See LSC Audit and Accounting
Guide for Recipients and Auditors,
revised June 1977, p. 3–3. LSC intended
part 1629 to ‘‘make mandatory [this]
important protection for the limited
funds available to serve eligible clients.’’
49 FR 23396, June 6, 1984. LSC
originally proposed requiring programs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:34 May 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
to obtain fidelity bond coverage at a
minimum level equal to 25% of the
recipient’s annualized LSC funding. Id.
Based on comments received in
response to the proposed rule, LSC
decreased the required coverage level to
10%. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984. LSC
also set a $50,000 minimum coverage
level ‘‘in response to the recognition
that a loss to a small program is
proportionally greater in effect than a
similar one to a large program.’’ Id.
LSC added rulemaking on part 1629
to its annual rulemaking agenda in April
2016. Regulatory action is justified for
three reasons. First, the regulation is
outdated. LSC has not revised part 1629
since it was adopted in 1984, and LSC
should update it to reflect current
insurance practices.
Second, the regulation was derived
from a source that does not provide the
optimal model for a federally funded
grant-making entity today. The original
rule was based on fidelity bonding
provisions found in the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA). See Section 412 of Public Law
93–406, and related regulations at 29
CFR 2550.412–1 and 29 CFR part 2580.
ERISA concerns minimum standards for
retirement plans in private industry.
LSC no longer believes that this is an
appropriate model for LSC to follow,
and that instead LSC should look to
current regulations governing similar
grant-making entities and to reflect
current insurance practices.
Third, the current regulation is in
some respects unclear or ambiguous.
LSC has received requests for guidance
on how to interpret certain provisions in
part 1629, particularly those sections
about the form and extent of coverage
required by the rule. LSC does not
believe that the language in part 1629
provides sufficiently clear guidance to
LSC recipients or to LSC staff. LSC
proposes crafting an approach that is
tailored to LSC’s needs and that
simplifies the language in the rule to
reduce confusion.
On October 17, 2016, the Operations
and Regulations Committee (Committee)
of LSC’s Board of Directors (Board)
voted to recommend that the Board
authorize rulemaking on part 1629. On
October 19, 2016, the Board authorized
LSC to begin rulemaking. On April 23,
2017, the Committee voted to
recommend that the Board approve
publication of this NPRM in the Federal
Register for notice and public comment.
On April 24, 2017, the Board accepted
the Committee’s recommendation and
voted to approve publication of this
NPRM with a 30-day comment period.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Discussion of the Proposed Changes
Section 1629.1 Purpose
LSC proposes to add a purpose
section stating who must be covered
under the bond and what losses the
bond must protect against. Part 1629
currently does not have a purpose
section.
Section 1629.2 Definitions
LSC proposes to define annualized
funding level to include the amount of
the Basic Field Grant and special
purpose grant funds a recipient receives
annually from LSC. LSC believes it is
necessary to include ‘‘special purpose
grants’’ of LSC funds, such as
Technology Initiative Grants, Pro Bono
Innovation Fund grants, and emergency
relief grants, in the definition of
‘‘annualized funding level’’ to ensure
that the maximum amount of LSC funds
are protected.
Section 1629.3 Who must be bonded?
LSC currently requires recipients to
bond ‘‘[e]very director, officer,
employee and agent of a program who
handles funds or property of the
program . . . .’’ 45 CFR 1629.2(a)
(emphasis added). LSC considers the
term ‘‘handles’’ to include access to
funds or other recipient property or
‘‘decision-making powers with respect
to funds or property which can give rise
to [] risk of loss.’’ Id. Through a review
of recipient insurance policies, LSC has
found that most grantees have fidelity
coverage for all their employees. This
common practice exceeds the current
minimum requirements of part 1629.
When employees who were not required
to be bonded under part 1629 have
misappropriated LSC funds, grantees
that exceeded the minimum part 1629
coverage have typically been protected
from loss. LSC believes this common
practice is desirable and proposes to
require that recipients carry coverage for
all employees, regardless of whether the
employees ‘‘handle’’ program funds.
LSC currently requires grantees to
bond ‘‘agents’’ who handle funds or
property of the program. 45 CFR
1629.2(a). But LSC has found that most
recipients’ policies do not cover the
dishonest or fraudulent actions of agents
and independent contractors. In fact,
many policies explicitly exclude agents
and independent contractors from the
definition of ‘‘covered employee.’’ This
exclusion is problematic, as LSC
recipients often turn to third parties to
handle payroll functions. See Legal
Services Corporation Board of Directors,
Operations and Regulations Committee,
Transcript of Rulemaking Workshop,
Wednesday, May 18, 2016, pp. 82–84
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
(comments of Diana White). This means
that LSC funds are handled by persons
outside of the recipient’s control and
insurance coverage. In areas where there
are few insurers to choose from, it may
be impossible for recipients to get
insurance that covers ‘‘agents’’ or
‘‘independent contractors.’’
To address these issues and
adequately protect LSC funds from
misappropriation by recipients and
third parties, LSC proposes three
changes to the existing rule. First, LSC
proposes to require that recipients’
bonds cover volunteers, in addition to
directors, officers, employees, and
agents of the recipient. Second, LSC
proposes to require that recipients
ensure that third parties who provide
payroll, billing, and collection services
to the recipient have fidelity bond
coverage or similar insurance. The
recipient may accomplish this either by
extending its own insurance to the third
party or by ensuring that the third party
has its own fidelity bond coverage
sufficient to protect LSC funds in the
third party’s hands. Finally, LSC
proposes to include language allowing
recipients to either cover subrecipients
through their own fidelity policies or
ensure that the subrecipients have
policies adequate to protect subgranted
funds.
Section 1629.4 What forms of bonds
can recipients use?
Current § 1629.5 allows recipients to
choose different forms of bonds, such as
individual, blanket, or schedule. 45 CFR
1629.5. Section 1629.5 currently does
not address whether recipients may
choose types of insurance other than a
fidelity bond that achieve the same
purpose as a fidelity bond. Most LSC
recipients now protect against employee
dishonesty through riders to their
standard commercial crime policies.
Few grantees obtain separate fidelity
bonds.
In 1999, LSC issued an external
opinion permitting recipients to use
employee dishonesty insurance to
satisfy the bonding requirements of part
1629 if the recipient could show that the
policy gives the same level of protection
as a fidelity bond. See External Opinion
1999–10–26, part 1629 Purchase of
Employee Dishonesty Insurance in Lieu
of a Fidelity Bond (October 26, 1999).
To reflect this long-standing LSC policy,
LSC proposes revising part 1629 to
expressly allow recipients to substitute
employee dishonesty policies or other
methods of coverage for fidelity bonds.
This revision gives recipients greater
flexibility to choose the most readily
available and cost-effective methods of
insuring LSC funds. The revision also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:34 May 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
will make clear that the substance and
amount of coverage is more important
than the form.
Section 1629.5 What losses must the
bond cover?
Current § 1629.4 requires recipients to
have bonds that protect them against
‘‘all those risks of loss that might arise
through dishonest or fraudulent acts in
the handling of funds [.]’’ The strict
language—‘‘all those risks of loss’’—
implies that recipients must be
completely covered in the event of a
loss, and that policies with deductibles
would not be acceptable under current
part 1629. That is because if a recipient
has LSC funds stolen, and the policy
requires the recipient to absorb a
portion of that loss by paying a
deductible, then the recipient’s policy
did not cover against ‘‘all those risks of
loss.’’ Such strict language makes sense
under ERISA statutes and regulations, as
they are designed to protect retirees’
pension funds. But such language may
prevent recipients from obtaining
policies that will protect LSC funds
adequately if policies without
deductibles are prohibitively expensive.
LSC proposes to simplify the language
about the types of losses that the bond
must cover and to revise the rule to
allow recipients to purchase policies
that require payment of deductibles.
LSC proposes revising the definition to
state simply that the ‘‘bond must
provide recovery for loss caused by such
acts as: Fraud, dishonesty, larceny,
theft, embezzlement, forgery,
misappropriation, wrongful abstraction,
wrongful conversion, willful
misapplication, or any other fraudulent
or dishonest act committed by an
employee, officer, director, agent, or
volunteer.’’
Section 1629.6 What is the required
minimum level of coverage?
Under the existing rule, recipients
must maintain bond coverage equal to at
least 10% of the recipient’s annualized
LSC funding or of the initial grant if the
program is a new grantee. 45 CFR
1629.1(a). The minimum level of
coverage may never be less than
$50,000. Id. LSC proposes to increase
the minimum coverage level, which has
remained unchanged since 1984. Based
on a sampling of current recipients’
policies, the majority of recipients
already exceed the $50,000 minimum
level of coverage. In fact, most policies
provided coverage in excess of
$100,000. Because the common practice
among recipients already is to insure
recipient funds above the minimum
amount required by current § 1629.1(a),
LSC believes it is reasonable for LSC to
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20557
raise the minimum coverage level to
$100,000. LSC does not propose to
change the minimum percentage for
coverage.
Section 1629.7 May LSC funds be used
to cover bonding costs?
Part 1629 currently is silent as to
which costs associated with fidelity
bond coverage—deductibles, premiums,
rates, and single loss retention—are
allowable using LSC funds. To improve
clarity on this point, LSC proposes to
allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay
for the costs of bonding under this part
if they are (1) consistent with 45 CFR
part 1630, (2) in accordance with sound
business practice, and (3) reasonable.
This proposed rule is based on the
Uniform Guidance, which allows for
such costs. See 2 CFR 200.427.
LSC considered limiting the amount
of deductibles that LSC would consider
reasonable in the proposed rule. During
the process of drafting this proposed
rule, LSC examined a sample of
recipients’ current fidelity bonds and
found that most of those recipients’
policies have deductibles ranging from
$1,000 to $5,000. LSC could not
determine, based on research of external
sources, whether there are current best
practices in the nonprofit insurance
world that would help LSC establish a
reasonable limit on deductibles. LSC
determined that it would need more
data to set deductible limits and has
therefore chosen to allow recipients the
flexibility to consider the losses they are
willing to absorb when deciding the
appropriate deductibles.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1629
Fidelity bond, Grant programs—law,
Insurance, Legal services, Surety bonds.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Legal Services
Corporation proposes to revise 45 CFR
part 1629 as follows:
PART 1629—BONDING
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS
Sec.
1629.1 Purpose.
1629.2 Definitions.
1629.3 Who must be bonded?
1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients
use?
1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?
1629.6 What is the required minimum level
of coverage?
1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover
bonding costs?
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996e(1)(A) and
2996f(3).
§ 1629.1
Purpose.
This part is intended to protect LSC
funds by requiring that recipients be
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
20558
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
bonded or have similar insurance
coverage to indemnify recipients against
losses resulting from fraudulent or
dishonest acts committed by one or
more employees, officers, directors,
agents, volunteers, and third-party
contractors who handle LSC funds.
§ 1629.2
Definitions.
Annualized funding level means the
amount of:
(1) Basic Field Grant funds (including
Agricultural Worker and Native
American) and
(2) Special grants of LSC funds,
including Technology Initiative
Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund
grants, and emergency relief grants,
awarded by LSC to the recipient for
the fiscal year included in the
recipient’s annual audited financial
statements.
§ 1629.3
Who must be bonded?
(a) A recipient must supply fidelity
bond coverage for all employees,
officers, directors, agents, and
volunteers.
(b) If a recipient uses a third party for
payroll, billing, or collection services,
the recipient must either supply
coverage covering the third party or
ensure that the third party has a fidelity
bond or similar insurance coverage.
(c) For recipients with subgrants:
(1) The recipient must extend its
fidelity bond coverage to supply
identical coverage to the subrecipient
and the subrecipient’s directors,
officers, employees, agents, and
volunteers to the extent required to
comply with this Part; or
(2) The subrecipient must supply
proof of its own fidelity bond coverage
that meets the requirements of this Part
for the subrecipient’s directors, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers.
§ 1629.4 What forms of bonds can
recipients use?
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) A recipient may use any form of
bond, such as individual, name
schedule, position schedule, blanket, or
any combination of such forms of
bonds, as long as the type or
combination of bonds secured
adequately protects LSC funds.
(b) A recipient may use similar forms
of insurance that essentially fulfill the
same purpose as a fidelity bond.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:34 May 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
§ 1629.5
cover?
What losses must the bond
The bond must provide recovery for
loss caused by such acts as fraud,
dishonesty, larceny, theft,
embezzlement, forgery,
misappropriation, wrongful abstraction,
wrongful conversion, willful
misapplication, or any other fraudulent
or dishonest act committed by an
employee, officer, director, agent, or
volunteer.
§ 1629.6 What is the required minimum
level of coverage?
(a) A recipient must carry fidelity
bond coverage or similar coverage at a
minimum level of at least ten percent of
its annualized funding level for the
previous fiscal year.
(b) If a recipient is a new recipient,
the coverage must be at a minimum
level of at least ten percent of the initial
grant.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section, recipients must
not carry coverage under this part at a
level less than $100,000.
§ 1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover
bonding costs?
Costs of bonding required by this part
are allowable if expended consistent
with 45 CFR part 1630. Costs of bonding
such as rates, deductibles, single loss
retention, and premiums, are allowable
as an indirect cost if such bonding is in
accordance with sound business
practice and is reasonable.
Dated: April 27, 2017.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017–08857 Filed 5–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket Nos. 10–90, 14–58; Report No.
3075]
Petitions for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Petitions for reconsideration.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Petitions for Reconsideration
(Petitions) have been filed in the
Commission’s rulemaking proceeding
by Jennifer A. Manner, on behalf of
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,
Bohdan R. Pankiw, on behalf of
Pennsylvania Public Utility
Commission, and Arthur F. McNulty, on
behalf of Pennsylvania Department of
Community and Economic
Development.
SUMMARY:
Oppositions to the Petitions
must be filed on or before May 18, 2017.
Replies to an opposition must be filed
on or before May 30, 2017.
DATES:
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Minard, Telecommunications
Access Policy Division, Wireline
Competition Bureau, at (202) 418–7400
or email: Alexander.Minard@fcc.gov.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
document, Report No. 3075, released
April 25, 2017. The full text of the
Petitions is available for viewing and
copying at the FCC Reference
Information Center, 445 12th Street SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
They also may be accessed online via
the Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System at: https://apps.fcc.gov/
ecfs/. The Commission will not send a
copy of this document pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A), because this document
does not have an impact on any rules of
particular applicability.
Subject: In the Matter of Connect
America Fund, ETC Annual Reports and
Certifications, FCC 17–12, published at
82 FR 14466, March 21, 2017, in WC
Docket Nos. 10–90, 14–58. This
document is being published pursuant
to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR
1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–08858 Filed 5–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 3, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20555-20558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08857]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1629
Bonding Requirements for Recipients
AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would revise the Legal Services
Corporation's (LSC or Corporation) regulation about bonding
requirements for LSC
[[Page 20556]]
recipients. It would require recipients to bond all their employees and
to ensure that third parties who handle recipients' funds have bond
coverage, allow recipients to use other forms of insurance similar to
fidelity bonds, raise the minimum level of coverage, and allow
recipients to use LSC funds to pay for bonding costs. This proposed
rule will update part 1629 to reflect current insurance practices and
simplify the language in the rule to reduce confusion.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: lscrulemaking@lsc.gov. Include ``Part 1629
Rulemaking'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 337-6519.
Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20007, ATTN:
Part 1629 Rulemaking.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Part 1629 Rulemaking.
Instructions: LSC prefers electronic submissions via email
with attachments in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not consider written
comments sent to any other address or received after the end of the
comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC
20007; (202) 295-1563 (phone), (202) 337-6519 (fax), or sdavis@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Background
LSC created part 1629 in 1984 after several instances in which
recipients lost LSC funds through the dishonest behavior of persons
associated with the recipient. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984. While the
recipient recovered the funds in some cases, in others, the recipient
had to absorb the loss. Id.
Before enacting part 1629, LSC recommended that recipients have
fidelity coverage as a basic internal control. See LSC Audit and
Accounting Guide for Recipients and Auditors, revised June 1977, p. 3-
3. LSC intended part 1629 to ``make mandatory [this] important
protection for the limited funds available to serve eligible clients.''
49 FR 23396, June 6, 1984. LSC originally proposed requiring programs
to obtain fidelity bond coverage at a minimum level equal to 25% of the
recipient's annualized LSC funding. Id. Based on comments received in
response to the proposed rule, LSC decreased the required coverage
level to 10%. 49 FR 28717, July 16, 1984. LSC also set a $50,000
minimum coverage level ``in response to the recognition that a loss to
a small program is proportionally greater in effect than a similar one
to a large program.'' Id.
LSC added rulemaking on part 1629 to its annual rulemaking agenda
in April 2016. Regulatory action is justified for three reasons. First,
the regulation is outdated. LSC has not revised part 1629 since it was
adopted in 1984, and LSC should update it to reflect current insurance
practices.
Second, the regulation was derived from a source that does not
provide the optimal model for a federally funded grant-making entity
today. The original rule was based on fidelity bonding provisions found
in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). See
Section 412 of Public Law 93-406, and related regulations at 29 CFR
2550.412-1 and 29 CFR part 2580. ERISA concerns minimum standards for
retirement plans in private industry. LSC no longer believes that this
is an appropriate model for LSC to follow, and that instead LSC should
look to current regulations governing similar grant-making entities and
to reflect current insurance practices.
Third, the current regulation is in some respects unclear or
ambiguous. LSC has received requests for guidance on how to interpret
certain provisions in part 1629, particularly those sections about the
form and extent of coverage required by the rule. LSC does not believe
that the language in part 1629 provides sufficiently clear guidance to
LSC recipients or to LSC staff. LSC proposes crafting an approach that
is tailored to LSC's needs and that simplifies the language in the rule
to reduce confusion.
On October 17, 2016, the Operations and Regulations Committee
(Committee) of LSC's Board of Directors (Board) voted to recommend that
the Board authorize rulemaking on part 1629. On October 19, 2016, the
Board authorized LSC to begin rulemaking. On April 23, 2017, the
Committee voted to recommend that the Board approve publication of this
NPRM in the Federal Register for notice and public comment. On April
24, 2017, the Board accepted the Committee's recommendation and voted
to approve publication of this NPRM with a 30-day comment period.
II. Discussion of the Proposed Changes
Section 1629.1 Purpose
LSC proposes to add a purpose section stating who must be covered
under the bond and what losses the bond must protect against. Part 1629
currently does not have a purpose section.
Section 1629.2 Definitions
LSC proposes to define annualized funding level to include the
amount of the Basic Field Grant and special purpose grant funds a
recipient receives annually from LSC. LSC believes it is necessary to
include ``special purpose grants'' of LSC funds, such as Technology
Initiative Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund grants, and emergency
relief grants, in the definition of ``annualized funding level'' to
ensure that the maximum amount of LSC funds are protected.
Section 1629.3 Who must be bonded?
LSC currently requires recipients to bond ``[e]very director,
officer, employee and agent of a program who handles funds or property
of the program . . . .'' 45 CFR 1629.2(a) (emphasis added). LSC
considers the term ``handles'' to include access to funds or other
recipient property or ``decision-making powers with respect to funds or
property which can give rise to [] risk of loss.'' Id. Through a review
of recipient insurance policies, LSC has found that most grantees have
fidelity coverage for all their employees. This common practice exceeds
the current minimum requirements of part 1629. When employees who were
not required to be bonded under part 1629 have misappropriated LSC
funds, grantees that exceeded the minimum part 1629 coverage have
typically been protected from loss. LSC believes this common practice
is desirable and proposes to require that recipients carry coverage for
all employees, regardless of whether the employees ``handle'' program
funds.
LSC currently requires grantees to bond ``agents'' who handle funds
or property of the program. 45 CFR 1629.2(a). But LSC has found that
most recipients' policies do not cover the dishonest or fraudulent
actions of agents and independent contractors. In fact, many policies
explicitly exclude agents and independent contractors from the
definition of ``covered employee.'' This exclusion is problematic, as
LSC recipients often turn to third parties to handle payroll functions.
See Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors, Operations and
Regulations Committee, Transcript of Rulemaking Workshop, Wednesday,
May 18, 2016, pp. 82-84
[[Page 20557]]
(comments of Diana White). This means that LSC funds are handled by
persons outside of the recipient's control and insurance coverage. In
areas where there are few insurers to choose from, it may be impossible
for recipients to get insurance that covers ``agents'' or ``independent
contractors.''
To address these issues and adequately protect LSC funds from
misappropriation by recipients and third parties, LSC proposes three
changes to the existing rule. First, LSC proposes to require that
recipients' bonds cover volunteers, in addition to directors, officers,
employees, and agents of the recipient. Second, LSC proposes to require
that recipients ensure that third parties who provide payroll, billing,
and collection services to the recipient have fidelity bond coverage or
similar insurance. The recipient may accomplish this either by
extending its own insurance to the third party or by ensuring that the
third party has its own fidelity bond coverage sufficient to protect
LSC funds in the third party's hands. Finally, LSC proposes to include
language allowing recipients to either cover subrecipients through
their own fidelity policies or ensure that the subrecipients have
policies adequate to protect subgranted funds.
Section 1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients use?
Current Sec. 1629.5 allows recipients to choose different forms of
bonds, such as individual, blanket, or schedule. 45 CFR 1629.5. Section
1629.5 currently does not address whether recipients may choose types
of insurance other than a fidelity bond that achieve the same purpose
as a fidelity bond. Most LSC recipients now protect against employee
dishonesty through riders to their standard commercial crime policies.
Few grantees obtain separate fidelity bonds.
In 1999, LSC issued an external opinion permitting recipients to
use employee dishonesty insurance to satisfy the bonding requirements
of part 1629 if the recipient could show that the policy gives the same
level of protection as a fidelity bond. See External Opinion 1999-10-
26, part 1629 Purchase of Employee Dishonesty Insurance in Lieu of a
Fidelity Bond (October 26, 1999). To reflect this long-standing LSC
policy, LSC proposes revising part 1629 to expressly allow recipients
to substitute employee dishonesty policies or other methods of coverage
for fidelity bonds. This revision gives recipients greater flexibility
to choose the most readily available and cost-effective methods of
insuring LSC funds. The revision also will make clear that the
substance and amount of coverage is more important than the form.
Section 1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?
Current Sec. 1629.4 requires recipients to have bonds that protect
them against ``all those risks of loss that might arise through
dishonest or fraudulent acts in the handling of funds [.]'' The strict
language--``all those risks of loss''--implies that recipients must be
completely covered in the event of a loss, and that policies with
deductibles would not be acceptable under current part 1629. That is
because if a recipient has LSC funds stolen, and the policy requires
the recipient to absorb a portion of that loss by paying a deductible,
then the recipient's policy did not cover against ``all those risks of
loss.'' Such strict language makes sense under ERISA statutes and
regulations, as they are designed to protect retirees' pension funds.
But such language may prevent recipients from obtaining policies that
will protect LSC funds adequately if policies without deductibles are
prohibitively expensive.
LSC proposes to simplify the language about the types of losses
that the bond must cover and to revise the rule to allow recipients to
purchase policies that require payment of deductibles. LSC proposes
revising the definition to state simply that the ``bond must provide
recovery for loss caused by such acts as: Fraud, dishonesty, larceny,
theft, embezzlement, forgery, misappropriation, wrongful abstraction,
wrongful conversion, willful misapplication, or any other fraudulent or
dishonest act committed by an employee, officer, director, agent, or
volunteer.''
Section 1629.6 What is the required minimum level of coverage?
Under the existing rule, recipients must maintain bond coverage
equal to at least 10% of the recipient's annualized LSC funding or of
the initial grant if the program is a new grantee. 45 CFR 1629.1(a).
The minimum level of coverage may never be less than $50,000. Id. LSC
proposes to increase the minimum coverage level, which has remained
unchanged since 1984. Based on a sampling of current recipients'
policies, the majority of recipients already exceed the $50,000 minimum
level of coverage. In fact, most policies provided coverage in excess
of $100,000. Because the common practice among recipients already is to
insure recipient funds above the minimum amount required by current
Sec. 1629.1(a), LSC believes it is reasonable for LSC to raise the
minimum coverage level to $100,000. LSC does not propose to change the
minimum percentage for coverage.
Section 1629.7 May LSC funds be used to cover bonding costs?
Part 1629 currently is silent as to which costs associated with
fidelity bond coverage--deductibles, premiums, rates, and single loss
retention--are allowable using LSC funds. To improve clarity on this
point, LSC proposes to allow recipients to use LSC funds to pay for the
costs of bonding under this part if they are (1) consistent with 45 CFR
part 1630, (2) in accordance with sound business practice, and (3)
reasonable. This proposed rule is based on the Uniform Guidance, which
allows for such costs. See 2 CFR 200.427.
LSC considered limiting the amount of deductibles that LSC would
consider reasonable in the proposed rule. During the process of
drafting this proposed rule, LSC examined a sample of recipients'
current fidelity bonds and found that most of those recipients'
policies have deductibles ranging from $1,000 to $5,000. LSC could not
determine, based on research of external sources, whether there are
current best practices in the nonprofit insurance world that would help
LSC establish a reasonable limit on deductibles. LSC determined that it
would need more data to set deductible limits and has therefore chosen
to allow recipients the flexibility to consider the losses they are
willing to absorb when deciding the appropriate deductibles.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1629
Fidelity bond, Grant programs--law, Insurance, Legal services,
Surety bonds.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Legal Services
Corporation proposes to revise 45 CFR part 1629 as follows:
PART 1629--BONDING REQUIREMENTS FOR RECIPIENTS
Sec.
1629.1 Purpose.
1629.2 Definitions.
1629.3 Who must be bonded?
1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients use?
1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?
1629.6 What is the required minimum level of coverage?
1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover bonding costs?
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996e(1)(A) and 2996f(3).
Sec. 1629.1 Purpose.
This part is intended to protect LSC funds by requiring that
recipients be
[[Page 20558]]
bonded or have similar insurance coverage to indemnify recipients
against losses resulting from fraudulent or dishonest acts committed by
one or more employees, officers, directors, agents, volunteers, and
third-party contractors who handle LSC funds.
Sec. 1629.2 Definitions.
Annualized funding level means the amount of:
(1) Basic Field Grant funds (including Agricultural Worker and Native
American) and
(2) Special grants of LSC funds, including Technology Initiative
Grants, Pro Bono Innovation Fund grants, and emergency relief grants,
awarded by LSC to the recipient for the fiscal year included in the
recipient's annual audited financial statements.
Sec. 1629.3 Who must be bonded?
(a) A recipient must supply fidelity bond coverage for all
employees, officers, directors, agents, and volunteers.
(b) If a recipient uses a third party for payroll, billing, or
collection services, the recipient must either supply coverage covering
the third party or ensure that the third party has a fidelity bond or
similar insurance coverage.
(c) For recipients with subgrants:
(1) The recipient must extend its fidelity bond coverage to supply
identical coverage to the subrecipient and the subrecipient's
directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers to the extent
required to comply with this Part; or
(2) The subrecipient must supply proof of its own fidelity bond
coverage that meets the requirements of this Part for the
subrecipient's directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
Sec. 1629.4 What forms of bonds can recipients use?
(a) A recipient may use any form of bond, such as individual, name
schedule, position schedule, blanket, or any combination of such forms
of bonds, as long as the type or combination of bonds secured
adequately protects LSC funds.
(b) A recipient may use similar forms of insurance that essentially
fulfill the same purpose as a fidelity bond.
Sec. 1629.5 What losses must the bond cover?
The bond must provide recovery for loss caused by such acts as
fraud, dishonesty, larceny, theft, embezzlement, forgery,
misappropriation, wrongful abstraction, wrongful conversion, willful
misapplication, or any other fraudulent or dishonest act committed by
an employee, officer, director, agent, or volunteer.
Sec. 1629.6 What is the required minimum level of coverage?
(a) A recipient must carry fidelity bond coverage or similar
coverage at a minimum level of at least ten percent of its annualized
funding level for the previous fiscal year.
(b) If a recipient is a new recipient, the coverage must be at a
minimum level of at least ten percent of the initial grant.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section,
recipients must not carry coverage under this part at a level less than
$100,000.
Sec. 1629.7 Can LSC funds be used to cover bonding costs?
Costs of bonding required by this part are allowable if expended
consistent with 45 CFR part 1630. Costs of bonding such as rates,
deductibles, single loss retention, and premiums, are allowable as an
indirect cost if such bonding is in accordance with sound business
practice and is reasonable.
Dated: April 27, 2017.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-08857 Filed 5-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P