Pipeline Safety: Inflation Adjustment of Maximum Civil Penalties, 19325-19328 [2017-08530]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 80 / Thursday, April 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
attractive when these services are
interoperable than when they are not
interoperable. These benefits outweigh
any burdens associated with
compliance. Moreover, because all of
the VRS providers participated in the
discussions associated with the
development of the standards, the
Bureau believes that these standards are
acceptable to all VRS providers,
including small entities. Further, to
minimize any adverse impact on VRS
providers, the Bureau adopted an
alternative that narrows the scope of
application of the technical standard for
the interface between provider networks
and user equipment and software, so
that it governs only the interface
between a provider’s network and user
equipment that employs designated
open-source user software, rather than
all user equipment and software. Lastly,
document DA 17–76 allows extended
implementation periods to ensure that
providers have sufficient time to
implement the standards.
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 225
and 303(r) of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152,
154(i), 154(j), 225, 303(r), and the
authority delegated by the Commission
in Structure and Practices of the Video
Relay Service Program et al., Report and
Order, published at 78 FR 40582, July 5,
2013, document DA 17–76 is adopted,
and part 64 of the Commission’s rules
is amended.
The Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
document DA 17–76, including the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Incorporation by reference,
Individuals with disabilities,
Telecommunications relay services,
Video relay services.
Federal Communications Commission.
Karen Peltz Strauss,
Deputy Bureau Chief, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau.
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 part 64 as
follows:
PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
1. The authority citation for part 64 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 225, 254(k);
403(b)(2)(B), (c), 715, Pub. L. 104–104, 110
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Apr 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
Stat. 56. Interpret or apply 47 U.S.C. 201,
218, 222, 225, 226, 227, 228, 254(k), 616, 620,
and the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. 112–96, unless
otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 64.621 by:
a. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the
first instance of ‘‘VRS’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘Video Relay Service (VRS)’’;
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(3); and
■ c. Adding paragraphs (b) and (c) to
read as follows:
■
■
§ 64.621
Interoperability and portability.
(a) * * *
(3) Beginning no later than April 27,
2018, all VRS providers must ensure
that their VRS access technologies and
their video communication service
platforms are interoperable with the
VRS Access Technology Reference
Platform, including for point-to-point
calls, in accordance with the
Interoperability Profile for Relay User
Equipment (RUE Profile). No VRS
provider shall be compensated for
minutes of use involving their VRS
access technologies or video
communication service platforms that
are not interoperable with the VRS
Access Technology Reference Platform.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Technical standards for
interoperability and portability. (1)
Beginning no later than August 25,
2017, VRS providers shall ensure that
their provision of VRS and video
communications, including their access
technology, meets the requirements of
the VRS Provider Interoperability
Profile.
(2) Beginning no later than October
24, 2017, VRS providers shall provide a
standard xCard export interface to
enable users to import their lists of
contacts in xCard XML format, in
accordance with IETF RFC 6351.
(c) Incorporation by reference. The
standards required in this section are
incorporated by reference into this
section with the approval of the Director
of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
material is available for inspection at
the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), 445 12th Street,
SW., Reference Information Center,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554,
(202) 418–0270, and is available from
the sources indicated below. It is also
available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
call 202–741–6030 or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_
locations.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19325
(1) FCC (on behalf of SIP Forum), 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554,
(888) 225–5322 (voice), (844) 432–2275
(videophone), (888) 835–5322 (TTY).
(i) VRS US Providers Profile TWG–
6.1, the US VRS Provider
Interoperability Profile, September 23,
2015. https://www.fcc.gov/files/sipforum-vrs-us-providers-profile-twg-6-1.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) The following standards are
available from the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF) Secretariat, 5177
Brandin Court, Fremont, CA 94538,
510–492–4080.
(i) The Interoperability Profile for
Relay User Equipment, draft-vrs-ruedispatch-00, July 20, 2016 https://
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vrs-ruedispatch/.
(ii) Request for Comments (RFC) 6351,
xCard: vCard XML Representation
(August 2011) https://tools.ietf.org/
html/rfc6351.
[FR Doc. 2017–08488 Filed 4–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 190
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0010; Amdt. No.
190–17]
RIN–2137–AF16
Pipeline Safety: Inflation Adjustment of
Maximum Civil Penalties
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) is revising references in its
regulations to the maximum civil
penalties for violations of Federal
pipeline safety laws, or any PHMSA
regulations or orders issued thereunder.
Under the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015, which further amended the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, Federal
agencies are required to adjust their
civil monetary penalties effective
January 15, 2017, and annually
thereafter, to account for changes in
inflation.
PHMSA finds good cause to amend
the regulations related to civil penalties
without notice or opportunity for public
comment. Advance public notice is
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
19326
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 80 / Thursday, April 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
I. Environmental Assessment
J. Executive Order 13609 and International
Trade Analysis
K. Privacy Act
L. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
M. Executive Order 13609 and
International Trade Analysis
unnecessary for the reasons described in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
The effective date of this final
rule is April 27, 2017.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ahuva Battams, Attorney-Advisor,
Pipeline Safety Division, Office of Chief
Counsel, the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, by
telephone at 202–366–4400 or email at
ahuva.battams@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Civil Penalty Amendments
II. Justification for the Final Rule
III. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
B. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order
13563, and Department of Transportation
(DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
C. Executive Order 13132
D. Executive Order 13175
E. Executive Order 13211
On June 30, 2016, PHMSA published
an interim final rule, (81 FR 42564) in
the Federal Register. Under the Pipeline
Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job
Creation Act of 2015 (the 2015 Act),
Public Law 114–74, and consistent with
the process outlined in the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies:
‘‘Implementation of the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015,’’ M–16–06
(OMB Memorandum M–16–06), the
CFR citation
Current maximum civil penalty
Revised maximum civil penalty
49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.,
and any regulation or
order issued thereunder.
49 CFR 190.223(a) ...........
49 U.S.C. 60103; 49 U.S.C.
60111.
49 CFR 190.223(c) ............
$205,638 for each violation for each day
the violation continues, with a maximum
penalty
not
to
exceed
$2,056,380 for a related series of violations.
A penalty not to exceed $75,123 which
may be in addition to other penalties
under 40 U.S.C. 60101, et seq.
49 U.S.C. 60129 ..................
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
Violated statute
I. Civil Penalty Amendments
interim final rule stated that PHMSA is
revising references in its regulations to
the maximum civil penalties for
violations of Federal pipeline safety
laws, or any PHMSA regulations or
orders issued thereunder.
Pursuant to the 2015 Act, and
consistent with the process outlined in
the OMB memorandum titled
‘‘Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies:
Implementation of the 2017 annual
adjustment pursuant to the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015,’’ M–17–11
(OMB Memorandum M–17–11), PHMSA
is again revising references in these
regulations to the maximum civil
penalties for violations. Based on the
cost-of-living adjustment multiplier for
2017, derived from the Consumer Price
Index (CPI–U) for the month of October
2016 (not seasonally adjusted), a
multiplier of 1.01636 was used to
calculate updated maximum civil
penalty amounts.
The revised penalties are as follows:
49 CFR 190.223(d) ...........
$209,002 for each violation for each day
the violation continues, with a maximum
penalty
not
to
exceed
$2,090,022 for a related series of violations.
An administrative civil penalty not to exceed $76,352, which may be in addition to other penalties assessed under
49 U.S.C. 60101, et seq.
A penalty not to exceed $1,214.
The 2015 Act only applies to
prospective penalties and does not
retrospectively change any civil
penalties previously assessed or
enforced. Further, under the 2015 Act,
PHMSA is required to publish annual
inflation adjustments for each penalty
levied under 49 U.S.C. 60101, et seq., in
the Federal Register no later than
January 15 of each year.
The 2015 Act does not alter PHMSA’s
existing authority to assess penalties
levied for violations under 49 U.S.C.
60101, et seq. Additionally, if future
penalties or penalty adjustments are
enacted by statute or regulation,
PHMSA will not adjust these penalties
for inflation in the first year after the
penalties are in effect. PHMSA will
apply new annual penalty levels to any
penalties assessed on or after the date
these new penalty levels take effect.
II. Justification for Final Rule
PHMSA is proceeding directly to a
final rule without providing a notice of
proposed rulemaking or an opportunity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Apr 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
A penalty not to exceed $1,194 ..............
for public comment. This action is
permitted, in part, because the 2015 Act
directs PHMSA to adjust the civil
monetary penalties in accordance with
the schedule provided in the 2015 Act,
notwithstanding the notice and public
comment procedures in the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
However, PHMSA also notes that the
APA authorizes agencies to forego
providing the opportunity for prior
public notice and comment if an agency
finds good cause that notice and public
procedure are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest’’ (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)). In this
instance, public comment is
unnecessary because by making these
technical amendments, PHMSA is not
exercising discretion in a way that could
be informed by public comment.
PHMSA is required under the 2015 Act
and directed by the OMB Guidance to
publish this final rule by January 15,
2017, with the penalty levels stated
herein slated to take effect on that date.
Further, PHMSA is mandated by the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2015 Act and directed by the OMB
Guidance to adjust the penalty levels
pursuant to the specific procedures also
stated herein. Any public comments
received through notice and public
procedure would therefore not affect
PHMSA’s obligation to comply with the
2015 Act, nor would they affect the
methods used by PHMSA to adjust the
penalty levels.
III. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This final rule is published under the
authority of the 2015 Act, as well 49
U.S.C. 60101, et seq. These statutes
provide PHMSA with the authority to
levy civil penalties for violations of
Federal pipeline safety laws. The 2015
Act requires penalties levied by Federal
agencies pursuant to these laws to be
adjusted. Beginning in January 2017, the
2015 Act requires such penalties to be
adjusted on an annual basis no later
than January 15 of each year.
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 80 / Thursday, April 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563,
and Department of Transportation
(DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This final rule has been evaluated in
accordance with existing DOT policies
and procedures and determined to be
non-significant under Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993), and
Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, 76
FR 3821 (January 21, 2011). Consistent
with guidance in OMB Memorandum
M–17–11, this final rule is considered to
be a non-significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. Further,
this final rule is not significant under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of the DOT because it is limited to a
ministerial act in which the agency has
no discretion and where the economic
impact of the final rule is minimal (44
FR 11034). Accordingly, preparation of
a regulatory evaluation is not warranted.
This final rule imposes no new costs
upon persons conducting operations in
compliance with Federal pipeline
statutes and regulations. Those
operators not in compliance with these
statues and regulations may experience
an increased cost based on the penalties
levied against them for non-compliance;
however, this is an avoidable, variable
cost and thus is not considered in any
evaluation of the significance of this
regulatory action. The amendments in
this final rule could provide a deterrent
effect that could potentially lead to
safety benefits; however, PHMSA does
not expect such benefits to be
significant. Overall, it is anticipated that
costs and benefits from this final rule
would be minimal in real dollars.
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
C. Executive Order 13132
PHMSA has analyzed this final rule
according to Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism, 64 FR 43255 (August 10,
1999). The final rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States,
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The final rule
neither imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments nor preempts state law
governing intrastate pipelines.
Therefore, the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132
do not apply.
D. Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Apr 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
13175 on consultation and coordination
with Indian tribal governments, 65 FR
67249 (November 9, 2000). Because the
final rule does not have tribal
implications, does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs, and
is required by statute, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Executive Order 13211
This final rule is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use, 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001). It is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on supply,
distribution, or energy use. Further, the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) within OMB has not
designated this final rule as a significant
energy action.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601–611, requires each agency to
analyze proposed regulations and assess
their impact on small businesses and
other small entities to determine
whether this final rule is expected to
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The provisions of this final rule may
apply specifically to all businesses
using pipelines to transport hazardous
liquids, gas, and liquefied natural gas
(LNG) in interstate commerce.
Therefore, PHMSA certifies this final
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule imposes no new
requirements for recordkeeping or
reporting.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This final rule does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, Public Law 104–4. It does not
result in costs of $100 million or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any year for
either State, local, or tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or to the private sector,
and is the least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objective of the final
rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the consequences of major Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19327
actions and prepare a detailed statement
on actions significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment (42
U.S.C. 4321–4375). When developing
potential regulatory requirements,
PHMSA evaluates those requirements to
consider the environmental impact of
these amendments. Specifically,
PHMSA evaluates the risk of release and
resulting environmental impact; the risk
to human safety, including any risk to
first responders; if the proposed
regulation would be carried out in a
defined geographic area; and the
resources, especially in environmentally
sensitive areas, that could be impacted
by any proposed regulations.
This final rule would be generally
applicable to pipeline operators, and
would not be carried out in a defined
geographic area. The adjusted, increased
civil penalties listed in this final rule
may act as a deterrent to those violating
Federal pipeline safety laws, or any
PHMSA regulations or orders issued
thereunder. This may result in a
positive environmental impact as a
result of increased compliance with
Federal pipeline safety laws and any
PHMSA regulations or orders issued
thereunder. Based on the above
discussion, PHMSA concludes there are
no significant environmental impacts
associated with this final rule.
J. Executive Order 13609 and
International Trade Analysis
Under Executive Order 13609,
Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation, agencies must consider
whether the impacts associated with
significant variations between domestic
and international regulatory approaches
are unnecessary or may impair the
ability of American business to export
and compete internationally, 77 FR
26413 (May 4, 2012). In meeting shared
challenges involving health, safety,
labor, security, environmental, and
other issues, international regulatory
cooperation can identify approaches
that are at least as protective as those
that are or would be adopted in the
absence of such cooperation.
International regulatory cooperation can
also reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979 (Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 103–465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. For purposes of these
requirements, Federal agencies may
participate in the establishment of
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
19328
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 80 / Thursday, April 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
international standards so long as the
standards have a legitimate domestic
objective—such as providing for
safety—and do not operate to exclude
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, using them as the basis for
U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the
establishment of international standards
in order to protect the safety of the
American public, and we have assessed
the effects of this final rule to ensure
that it does not cause unnecessary
obstacles to foreign trade. Accordingly,
this final rule is consistent with
Executive Order 13609 and PHMSA’s
obligations.
K. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of written
communications and comments
received into our dockets by the name
of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement, published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19476), in the Federal Register
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR2000-04-11/pdf/00-8505.pdf.
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
L. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in the spring and fall of each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Apr 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
year. The RIN contained in the heading
of this document can be used to crossreference this action in the Unified
Agenda.
■
M. Executive Order 13609 and
International Trade Analysis
Sections 3 and 4 of Executive Order
13609 direct an agency to conduct a
regulatory analysis and ensure that a
proposed rule does not cause
unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade.
This requirement applies if a rule
constitutes a significant regulatory
action, or if a regulatory evaluation must
be prepared for the rule. This interim
final rule is not a significant regulatory
action, but a regulatory action under
Section 3(e) of Executive Order 12866.
PHMSA is not required under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 to submit a
regulatory analysis.
(a) Any person found to have violated
a provision of 49 U.S.C. 60101, et seq.,
or any regulations or orders issued
thereunder, is subject to an
administrative civil penalty not to
exceed $209,002 for each violation for
each day the violation continues, with
a maximum administrative civil penalty
not to exceed $2,090,022 for any related
series of violations.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Any person found to have violated
any standard or order under 49 U.S.C.
60103 is subject to an administrative
civil penalty not to exceed $76,352,
which may be in addition to other
penalties to which such person may be
subject under paragraph (a) of this
section.
(d) Any person who is determined to
have violated any standard or order
under 49 U.S.C. 60129 is subject to an
administrative civil penalty not to
exceed $1,214, which may be in
addition to other penalties to which
such person may be subject under
paragraph (a) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 190
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties, Pipeline safety.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 49 CFR part 190 which was
published at 81 FR 42564 on June 30,
2016, is adopted as a final rule with the
following changes:
PART 190—PIPELINE SAFETY
ENFORCEMENT AND REGULATORY
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 190
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(b); 49 U.S.C.
60101 et seq.; 49 CFR 1.97; Pub. L. 114–74,
section 701; Pub. L. No: 112–90, section 2;
Pub. L. 101–410, sections 4–6.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
2. In § 190.223 paragraphs (a), (c), and
(d) are revised to read as follows:
§ 190.223
Maximum penalties.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 24,
2017, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.97.
Howard W. McMillan,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–08530 Filed 4–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 80 (Thursday, April 27, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19325-19328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08530]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 190
[Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0010; Amdt. No. 190-17]
RIN-2137-AF16
Pipeline Safety: Inflation Adjustment of Maximum Civil Penalties
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) is revising references in its regulations to the maximum civil
penalties for violations of Federal pipeline safety laws, or any PHMSA
regulations or orders issued thereunder. Under the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which
further amended the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990, Federal agencies are required to adjust their civil monetary
penalties effective January 15, 2017, and annually thereafter, to
account for changes in inflation.
PHMSA finds good cause to amend the regulations related to civil
penalties without notice or opportunity for public comment. Advance
public notice is
[[Page 19326]]
unnecessary for the reasons described in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section.
DATES: The effective date of this final rule is April 27, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ahuva Battams, Attorney-Advisor,
Pipeline Safety Division, Office of Chief Counsel, the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, by telephone at 202-366-4400
or email at ahuva.battams@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Civil Penalty Amendments
II. Justification for the Final Rule
III. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
B. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and Department
of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
C. Executive Order 13132
D. Executive Order 13175
E. Executive Order 13211
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Procedures and Policies
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
I. Environmental Assessment
J. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
K. Privacy Act
L. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
M. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
I. Civil Penalty Amendments
On June 30, 2016, PHMSA published an interim final rule, (81 FR
42564) in the Federal Register. Under the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory
Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2015 (the 2015 Act), Public Law 114-
74, and consistent with the process outlined in the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Memorandum for the Heads of Executive
Departments and Agencies: ``Implementation of the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015,'' M-16-06
(OMB Memorandum M-16-06), the interim final rule stated that PHMSA is
revising references in its regulations to the maximum civil penalties
for violations of Federal pipeline safety laws, or any PHMSA
regulations or orders issued thereunder.
Pursuant to the 2015 Act, and consistent with the process outlined
in the OMB memorandum titled ``Memorandum for the Heads of Executive
Departments and Agencies: Implementation of the 2017 annual adjustment
pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015,'' M-17-11 (OMB Memorandum M-17-11), PHMSA is
again revising references in these regulations to the maximum civil
penalties for violations. Based on the cost-of-living adjustment
multiplier for 2017, derived from the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for
the month of October 2016 (not seasonally adjusted), a multiplier of
1.01636 was used to calculate updated maximum civil penalty amounts.
The revised penalties are as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current maximum civil Revised maximum civil
Violated statute CFR citation penalty penalty
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq., and any 49 CFR 190.223(a)...... $205,638 for each $209,002 for each
regulation or order issued violation for each day violation for each day
thereunder. the violation the violation
continues, with a continues, with a
maximum penalty not to maximum penalty not to
exceed $2,056,380 for exceed $2,090,022 for
a related series of a related series of
violations. violations.
49 U.S.C. 60103; 49 U.S.C. 60111..... 49 CFR 190.223(c)...... A penalty not to exceed An administrative civil
$75,123 which may be penalty not to exceed
in addition to other $76,352, which may be
penalties under 40 in addition to other
U.S.C. 60101, et seq. penalties assessed
under 49 U.S.C. 60101,
et seq.
49 U.S.C. 60129...................... 49 CFR 190.223(d)...... A penalty not to exceed A penalty not to exceed
$1,194. $1,214.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2015 Act only applies to prospective penalties and does not
retrospectively change any civil penalties previously assessed or
enforced. Further, under the 2015 Act, PHMSA is required to publish
annual inflation adjustments for each penalty levied under 49 U.S.C.
60101, et seq., in the Federal Register no later than January 15 of
each year.
The 2015 Act does not alter PHMSA's existing authority to assess
penalties levied for violations under 49 U.S.C. 60101, et seq.
Additionally, if future penalties or penalty adjustments are enacted by
statute or regulation, PHMSA will not adjust these penalties for
inflation in the first year after the penalties are in effect. PHMSA
will apply new annual penalty levels to any penalties assessed on or
after the date these new penalty levels take effect.
II. Justification for Final Rule
PHMSA is proceeding directly to a final rule without providing a
notice of proposed rulemaking or an opportunity for public comment.
This action is permitted, in part, because the 2015 Act directs PHMSA
to adjust the civil monetary penalties in accordance with the schedule
provided in the 2015 Act, notwithstanding the notice and public comment
procedures in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). However, PHMSA
also notes that the APA authorizes agencies to forego providing the
opportunity for prior public notice and comment if an agency finds good
cause that notice and public procedure are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest'' (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)). In this instance, public comment is unnecessary because
by making these technical amendments, PHMSA is not exercising
discretion in a way that could be informed by public comment. PHMSA is
required under the 2015 Act and directed by the OMB Guidance to publish
this final rule by January 15, 2017, with the penalty levels stated
herein slated to take effect on that date. Further, PHMSA is mandated
by the 2015 Act and directed by the OMB Guidance to adjust the penalty
levels pursuant to the specific procedures also stated herein. Any
public comments received through notice and public procedure would
therefore not affect PHMSA's obligation to comply with the 2015 Act,
nor would they affect the methods used by PHMSA to adjust the penalty
levels.
III. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This final rule is published under the authority of the 2015 Act,
as well 49 U.S.C. 60101, et seq. These statutes provide PHMSA with the
authority to levy civil penalties for violations of Federal pipeline
safety laws. The 2015 Act requires penalties levied by Federal agencies
pursuant to these laws to be adjusted. Beginning in January 2017, the
2015 Act requires such penalties to be adjusted on an annual basis no
later than January 15 of each year.
[[Page 19327]]
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, and Department of Transportation
(DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This final rule has been evaluated in accordance with existing DOT
policies and procedures and determined to be non-significant under
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735
(October 4, 1993), and Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, 76 FR 3821 (January 21, 2011). Consistent with
guidance in OMB Memorandum M-17-11, this final rule is considered to be
a non-significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Further, this final rule is not significant under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the DOT because it is limited to a
ministerial act in which the agency has no discretion and where the
economic impact of the final rule is minimal (44 FR 11034).
Accordingly, preparation of a regulatory evaluation is not warranted.
This final rule imposes no new costs upon persons conducting
operations in compliance with Federal pipeline statutes and
regulations. Those operators not in compliance with these statues and
regulations may experience an increased cost based on the penalties
levied against them for non-compliance; however, this is an avoidable,
variable cost and thus is not considered in any evaluation of the
significance of this regulatory action. The amendments in this final
rule could provide a deterrent effect that could potentially lead to
safety benefits; however, PHMSA does not expect such benefits to be
significant. Overall, it is anticipated that costs and benefits from
this final rule would be minimal in real dollars.
C. Executive Order 13132
PHMSA has analyzed this final rule according to Executive Order
13132 on Federalism, 64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999). The final rule does
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, the relationship
between the national government and the States, or the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. The
final rule neither imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State
and local governments nor preempts state law governing intrastate
pipelines. Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of
Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
D. Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13175 on consultation and
coordination with Indian tribal governments, 65 FR 67249 (November 9,
2000). Because the final rule does not have tribal implications, does
not impose substantial direct compliance costs, and is required by
statute, the funding and consultation requirements of Executive Order
13175 do not apply.
E. Executive Order 13211
This final rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001). It is not likely to have a significant adverse effect
on supply, distribution, or energy use. Further, the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within OMB has not designated
this final rule as a significant energy action.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Procedures and Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-611, requires each
agency to analyze proposed regulations and assess their impact on small
businesses and other small entities to determine whether this final
rule is expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities. The provisions of this final rule may apply
specifically to all businesses using pipelines to transport hazardous
liquids, gas, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) in interstate commerce.
Therefore, PHMSA certifies this final rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule imposes no new requirements for recordkeeping or
reporting.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4. It does not
result in costs of $100 million or more (adjusted for inflation) in any
year for either State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objective of the final rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider the consequences of major Federal
actions and prepare a detailed statement on actions significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment (42 U.S.C. 4321-4375).
When developing potential regulatory requirements, PHMSA evaluates
those requirements to consider the environmental impact of these
amendments. Specifically, PHMSA evaluates the risk of release and
resulting environmental impact; the risk to human safety, including any
risk to first responders; if the proposed regulation would be carried
out in a defined geographic area; and the resources, especially in
environmentally sensitive areas, that could be impacted by any proposed
regulations.
This final rule would be generally applicable to pipeline
operators, and would not be carried out in a defined geographic area.
The adjusted, increased civil penalties listed in this final rule may
act as a deterrent to those violating Federal pipeline safety laws, or
any PHMSA regulations or orders issued thereunder. This may result in a
positive environmental impact as a result of increased compliance with
Federal pipeline safety laws and any PHMSA regulations or orders issued
thereunder. Based on the above discussion, PHMSA concludes there are no
significant environmental impacts associated with this final rule.
J. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
Under Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation, agencies must consider whether the impacts associated with
significant variations between domestic and international regulatory
approaches are unnecessary or may impair the ability of American
business to export and compete internationally, 77 FR 26413 (May 4,
2012). In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor,
security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory
cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as
those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation.
International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or
prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as
amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging
in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements,
Federal agencies may participate in the establishment of
[[Page 19328]]
international standards so long as the standards have a legitimate
domestic objective--such as providing for safety--and do not operate to
exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, using
them as the basis for U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the establishment of international standards
in order to protect the safety of the American public, and we have
assessed the effects of this final rule to ensure that it does not
cause unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade. Accordingly, this final
rule is consistent with Executive Order 13609 and PHMSA's obligations.
K. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of written
communications and comments received into our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement, published on April
11, 2000 (65 FR 19476), in the Federal Register at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2000-04-11/pdf/00-8505.pdf.
L. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
the spring and fall of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross-reference this action in the Unified
Agenda.
M. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
Sections 3 and 4 of Executive Order 13609 direct an agency to
conduct a regulatory analysis and ensure that a proposed rule does not
cause unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade. This requirement applies
if a rule constitutes a significant regulatory action, or if a
regulatory evaluation must be prepared for the rule. This interim final
rule is not a significant regulatory action, but a regulatory action
under Section 3(e) of Executive Order 12866. PHMSA is not required
under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 to submit a regulatory analysis.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 190
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties, Pipeline safety.
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 49 CFR part 190 which was
published at 81 FR 42564 on June 30, 2016, is adopted as a final rule
with the following changes:
PART 190--PIPELINE SAFETY ENFORCEMENT AND REGULATORY PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 190 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(b); 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.; 49 CFR
1.97; Pub. L. 114-74, section 701; Pub. L. No: 112-90, section 2;
Pub. L. 101-410, sections 4-6.
0
2. In Sec. 190.223 paragraphs (a), (c), and (d) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 190.223 Maximum penalties.
(a) Any person found to have violated a provision of 49 U.S.C.
60101, et seq., or any regulations or orders issued thereunder, is
subject to an administrative civil penalty not to exceed $209,002 for
each violation for each day the violation continues, with a maximum
administrative civil penalty not to exceed $2,090,022 for any related
series of violations.
* * * * *
(c) Any person found to have violated any standard or order under
49 U.S.C. 60103 is subject to an administrative civil penalty not to
exceed $76,352, which may be in addition to other penalties to which
such person may be subject under paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Any person who is determined to have violated any standard or
order under 49 U.S.C. 60129 is subject to an administrative civil
penalty not to exceed $1,214, which may be in addition to other
penalties to which such person may be subject under paragraph (a) of
this section.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 24, 2017, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Howard W. McMillan,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-08530 Filed 4-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P