Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests, Palouse Ranger District; Idaho; Little Boulder Project, 19197-19198 [2017-08406]
Download as PDF
19197
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 79
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
April 21, 2017.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments are
requested regarding (1) whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments regarding this information
collection received by May 26, 2017 will
be considered. Written comments
should be addressed to: Desk Officer for
Agriculture, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), New
Executive Office Building, 725—17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20502.
Commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Copies of the submission(s) may
be obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Apr 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Foreign Agricultural Service
Title: Dairy Tariff-Rate Import Quota
Licensing Program.
OMB Control Number: 0551–0001.
Summary of Collection: The Dairy
Tariff-Rate Import Quota regulation (the
Regulation) (7 CFR part 6.20–6.37)
which governs the administration of the
import licensing system applicable to
most dairy products subject to tariff-rate
quotas (TRQs). The importation of most
cheese made from cow’s milk and
certain non-cheese dairy articles (butter,
dried milks, and butter substitutes) are
subject to TRQs and must be
accompanied by an import license
issued by the Department to enter at the
lower tariff. Importers without licenses
may enter these dairy articles, but are
required to pay the higher tariff. The
Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) will
collect information using several forms.
Need and Use of the Information: FAS
will use the collected information in the
administration of the tariff-rate import
quota licensing system for certain dairy
products and the issuance of licenses in
accordance with the Regulation. If the
information were collected less
frequently, FSA would be unable to
issue licenses on an annual basis in
compliance with the Import Regulation.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other-for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 700.
Frequency of Responses: Record
keeping, Reporting: Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 479.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–08418 Filed 4–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests,
Palouse Ranger District; Idaho; Little
Boulder Project
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Forest Service, USDA.
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
ACTION:
The Little Boulder project was
released for public scoping in November
2014. The anticipated National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
analysis level at that time was an
environmental assessment. Upon further
environmental impact analysis, the
responsible official decided to proceed
with an environmental impact statement
(EIS) to analyze and disclose any
significant effects which may result
from the proposed action. Those who
submitted comments in response to the
initial scoping request within the
allotted timeframe already have
standing to object. To establish standing
to object, comments may still be
submitted in response to this notice no
later than 30 days from May 26, 2017
OR by providing comments during the
45-day comment period following
distribution of the draft EIS.
DATES: The draft environmental impact
statement is expected September 2017
and the final environmental impact
statement is expected March 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Israel, NEPA Planner (North
Zone), Nez Perce-Clearwater National
Forests, (208) 476–8344 or
sisrael@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the Little Boulder
project is to create conditions that are
more resilient to disturbance by
restoring white pine and other seral tree
species and to initiate recovery of
watershed function. Currently, grand fir
and Douglas-fir tree species dominate
the landscape within the proposed
project area. The current species
composition is creating intense
competition for nutrients and ladder
fuels in the drier, fire-dependent
ecosystems. If left untreated, these
conditions would lead to a decline in
forest health and put future ecological,
societal, and economical values at risk.
There is a need to initiate recovery of
watershed function with management
actions aimed at reducing long-term
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
19198
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 26, 2017 / Notices
sedimentation to streams and improving
soil productivity. Nearly all of the fishbearing streams in the Little Boulder
project area are critical habitat for
steelhead. A combination of various
past management activities have
resulted in channels with excess
sediment, areas of bank instability, and
decreased fisheries habitat. The
proposed activities in the Little Boulder
project would aim to improve future
watershed conditions.
Proposed Action
The original proposed action
identified has been modified based on
additional field review, resource
concerns, and scoping comments.
Information about the original proposed
action can be found on the project Web
site at https://prdp2fs.ess.udsa.gov/
project/?project=45225. The current
proposal, also identified as Alternative
2, would harvest timber from
approximately 2,680 acres. Noncommercial fuels reduction treatments
would occur on approximately 1,180
acres. Proposed activities would require
construction of 5.2 miles of new roads,
9 miles of reconstruction, and 14.9
miles of road re-conditioning. 10.2 miles
of temporary roads would be
decommissioned after harvest.
Watershed improvements would
include: Placing existing roads needed
for future management into intermittent
storage; improving channel and riparian
function through woody debris and
vegetation treatments; replacing
undersized or deteriorated culverts;
replacing existing Ruby Creek ford with
a bridge or other aquatic organism
passage structure; and decompacting
existing skid trails and landings.
Possible Alternatives
Three alternatives are being
developed in addition to the proposed
action (Alternative 2) for the Little
Boulder project: Alternative 1—Noaction; Alternative 2—Proposed Action
(preferred); Alternative 3—Existing
Roads; Alternative 4–Openings Less
Than 40 Acres in Size.
Responsible Official
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Forest Supervisor, Nez PerceClearwater National Forests.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will
determine whether to adopt the
proposed action or another alternative,
in whole or in part, and what mitigation
measurements and management
requirements will be implemented.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Apr 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments submitted
in a timely and appropriate response to
the previous notification to prepare an
environmental assessment were
reviewed, considered, and already
established standing to object.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not procide the Agecny
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Dated: April 13, 2017.
Glenn P. Casamassa,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2017–08406 Filed 4–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revision of Land Management Plan for
Gila National Forest; Counties of
Catron, Grant, Hidalgo, and Sierra,
New Mexico
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to revise the
Gila National Forest Land Management
Plan and prepare an associated
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As directed by the National
Forest Management Act, the USDA
Forest Service is revising the Gila
National Forest’s Land Management
Plan (hereafter referred to as Forest
Plan) through development of an
associated National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS). This notice
describes the documents available for
review and how to obtain them;
summarizes the needs for change to the
existing Forest Plan; provides
information concerning public
participation and collaboration,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
including the process for submitting
comments; provides an estimated
schedule for the planning process,
including the time available for
comments, and includes the names and
addresses of agency contacts who can
provide additional information.
DATES: Comments concerning the Needs
for Change and Proposed Action
provided in this notice will be most
useful in the development of the revised
plan and draft EIS if received by June
12, 2017. The agency expects to release
a draft revised plan and draft EIS,
developed through a collaborative
public engagement process by spring
2018, and a final revised plan and final
EIS by summer/fall 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Gila National Forest, Attn: Plan
Revision, 3005 E. Camino del Bosque,
Silver City, NM 88061. Comments may
also be sent via email to gilaplan@
fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Schultz, Forest Planner, Gila National
Forest, 575–388–8280. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday. More information on our forest
plan revision process can be found on
our Web site at https://go.usa.gov/h88k.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Forest Management Act
(NFMA) of 1976 requires that every
National Forest System (NFS) unit
develop a forest plan. On April 9, 2012,
the Forest Service finalized its land
management planning rule (2012
Planning Rule, 36 CFR 219), which
describes requirements for the planning
process and the content of the forest
plans. Forest plans describe the strategic
direction for management of forest
resources for ten to fifteen years, and are
adaptive and amendable as conditions
change over time. Under the 2012
Planning Rule, the assessment of
ecological, social, cultural, and
economic conditions and trends is the
first stage of the planning process (36
CFR 219.6). The second stage, formal
plan revision, involves the development
of our forest plan in conjunction with
the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
third stage of the process is monitoring
and feedback, which is ongoing over the
life of the revised forest plans.
The Gila National Forest has
completed its assessment pursuant to
2012 Forest Planning Rule. The
assessment was developed with public
participation and includes an evaluation
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19197-19198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests, Palouse Ranger District;
Idaho; Little Boulder Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Little Boulder project was released for public scoping in
November 2014. The anticipated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
analysis level at that time was an environmental assessment. Upon
further environmental impact analysis, the responsible official decided
to proceed with an environmental impact statement (EIS) to analyze and
disclose any significant effects which may result from the proposed
action. Those who submitted comments in response to the initial scoping
request within the allotted timeframe already have standing to object.
To establish standing to object, comments may still be submitted in
response to this notice no later than 30 days from May 26, 2017 OR by
providing comments during the 45-day comment period following
distribution of the draft EIS.
DATES: The draft environmental impact statement is expected September
2017 and the final environmental impact statement is expected March
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Israel, NEPA Planner (North
Zone), Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests, (208) 476-8344 or
sisrael@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the Little Boulder project is to create conditions
that are more resilient to disturbance by restoring white pine and
other seral tree species and to initiate recovery of watershed
function. Currently, grand fir and Douglas-fir tree species dominate
the landscape within the proposed project area. The current species
composition is creating intense competition for nutrients and ladder
fuels in the drier, fire-dependent ecosystems. If left untreated, these
conditions would lead to a decline in forest health and put future
ecological, societal, and economical values at risk.
There is a need to initiate recovery of watershed function with
management actions aimed at reducing long-term
[[Page 19198]]
sedimentation to streams and improving soil productivity. Nearly all of
the fish-bearing streams in the Little Boulder project area are
critical habitat for steelhead. A combination of various past
management activities have resulted in channels with excess sediment,
areas of bank instability, and decreased fisheries habitat. The
proposed activities in the Little Boulder project would aim to improve
future watershed conditions.
Proposed Action
The original proposed action identified has been modified based on
additional field review, resource concerns, and scoping comments.
Information about the original proposed action can be found on the
project Web site at https://prdp2fs.ess.udsa.gov/project/?project=45225.
The current proposal, also identified as Alternative 2, would harvest
timber from approximately 2,680 acres. Non-commercial fuels reduction
treatments would occur on approximately 1,180 acres. Proposed
activities would require construction of 5.2 miles of new roads, 9
miles of reconstruction, and 14.9 miles of road re-conditioning. 10.2
miles of temporary roads would be decommissioned after harvest.
Watershed improvements would include: Placing existing roads needed
for future management into intermittent storage; improving channel and
riparian function through woody debris and vegetation treatments;
replacing undersized or deteriorated culverts; replacing existing Ruby
Creek ford with a bridge or other aquatic organism passage structure;
and decompacting existing skid trails and landings.
Possible Alternatives
Three alternatives are being developed in addition to the proposed
action (Alternative 2) for the Little Boulder project: Alternative 1--
No-action; Alternative 2--Proposed Action (preferred); Alternative 3--
Existing Roads; Alternative 4-Openings Less Than 40 Acres in Size.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will determine whether to adopt the
proposed action or another alternative, in whole or in part, and what
mitigation measurements and management requirements will be
implemented.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Comments
submitted in a timely and appropriate response to the previous
notification to prepare an environmental assessment were reviewed,
considered, and already established standing to object.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not procide
the Agecny with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Dated: April 13, 2017.
Glenn P. Casamassa,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-08406 Filed 4-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P