Establishment of Restricted Area R-2507W; Chocolate Mountains, CA, 17936-17938 [2017-07573]
Download as PDF
17936
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 71 / Friday, April 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Compliance with paragraph (f)(2)(i) or
(f)(2)(iii) of this AD is terminating action for
the initial and repetitive USIs specified by
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (f)—HPC STAGE 8–10 SPOOL S/NS
Part Nos.
Serial Nos.
1844M90G01 ......................................................................
1844M90G02 ......................................................................
(2) For all HPC stage 8–10 spools, P/N
1694M80G04, 1844M90G01, or 1844M90G02,
perform an eddy current inspection (ECI) of
the stage 8 aft upper face as follows:
(i) Perform an initial ECI of the stage 8 aft
web upper face at the next shop visit after the
effective date of this AD.
(ii) Thereafter, perform an ECI of the stage
8 aft web upper face at each subsequent shop
visit.
(iii) If you performed an ECI of the stage
8 aft web upper surface before the effective
date of the AD, you met the requirements of
paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD.
(3) Remove from service any HPC stage 8–
10 spool that fails the inspection required by
paragraphs (f)(1) or (2) of this AD, and
replace with a spool eligible for installation.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Apr 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
GWNBK753
GWNBK754
GWNBK841
GWNBK842
GWNBK843
GWNBK844
GWNBK952
GWNBK953
GWNBK954
GWNBK955
GWNBK956
GWNBK957
GWNBK958
GWNBK959
GWN01C5N
GWN01GE2
GWN01GE3
GWN01GE4
GWN01GE6
GWN01WH1
GWN02688
GWN02689
GWN0268A
GWN02DP2
GWN02DP3
GWN02F9F
GWN02F9G
GWN02L9T
GWNBS077
GWNBS078
GWNBS079
GWNBS080
GWNBS081
GWNBS157
GWNBS158
GWNBS159
GWNBS160
GWNBS266
GWNBS267
GWNBS268
GWNBS269
GWNBS270
GWN02N8D
GWN02T3R
GWN02WGM
GWN0311K
GWN035PP
GWN038TD
GWN039TG
GWN03G2R
GWN03G2W
GWN03G30
GWN03JPC
GWN03JPD
GWN03N8P
GWN03N8R
phone: 781–238–7756; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: john.frost@faa.gov.
(2) GE GE90 Service Bulletin (SB) 72–1151,
Revision 01, dated September 13, 2016; GE
GE90 SB 72–1151, Revision 0, dated June 10,
2016; Chapter 72–31–08, Special Procedures
003; and Chapter 72–00–31, Special
Procedures 006, in GE GE90 Engine Manual,
GEK100700, Revision 68, dated September 1,
2016, can be obtained from GE using the
contact information in paragraph (i)(3) of this
AD. These SBs describe procedures for an onwing USI of the stage 8 web of the stage 8–
10 spool. These engine manual procedures
describe how to perform ECI of the stage 8
aft web of the stage 8–10 spool.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact General Electric Company,
GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215, phone: 513–552–3272;
fax: 513–552–3329; email: geae.aoc@ge.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
GWNBS497
GWNBS499
GWNBS500
GWNBS501
GWNBS502
GWNBS609
GWNBS610
GWNBS611
GWNBS612
GWNBS613
GWNBS614
GWNBS721
GWNBS722
GWNBS723
GWN03RTM
GWN03RTP
GWN040RL
GWN040RM
GWN040RN
GWN040RP
GWN04202
GWN0435W
GWN04360
GWN04361
GWN04362
GWN04ATG
GWN04ATH
GWN04E20
GWNBS724
GWNBS794
GWNBS810
GWNBS811
GWNBS812
GWNBS813
GWNBS814
GWNBS910
GWNBS911
GWNBS912
GWNBS914
GWNBS915
GWNBS982
GWNBS983
GWN04E21
GWN04GHT
GWN04GHW
GWN04GJ0
GWN04JW6
GWN04JW7
GWN04JW8
GWN04L7K
GWN04L7L
GWN04MT7
GWN04MT8
GWNBS984
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA–2015–2193; Airspace
Docket No. 15–AWP–8]
Establishment of Restricted Area R–
2507W; Chocolate Mountains, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
April 5, 2017.
Carlos A. Pestana,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
This action establishes
restricted area R–2507W, Chocolate
Mountains, CA, to support training
activities that involve the use of
advanced weapons systems. This action
ensures realistic United States Marine
Corps (USMC) training on live fire and
non-live fire aviation activities such as
Basic Ordinance Delivery, Close Air
Support, Air-to-Air Gunnery, Laser
Ranging and Designating, and Air
Strikes. Restricted area R–2507W will
allow the USMC to enhance training
and safety requirements in order to
maintain, train, and equip combat-ready
military forces.
[FR Doc. 2017–07476 Filed 4–13–17; 8:45 am]
(g) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, an engine shop
visit is the induction of an engine into the
shop for maintenance during which the
compressor discharge pressure seal face is
exposed.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact John Frost, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
GWN005MF
GWN005MG
GWN0087M
GWN0087N
GWN00DGK
GWN00DGL
GWNBJ992
GWNBK667
GWNBK674
GWNBK675
GWNBK743
GWNBK744
GWNBK751
GWNBK752
GWN00C2T
GWN00C2V
GWN00G2N
GWN00G2P
GWN00PFP
GWN00PFR
GWN00T2N
GWN00YHV
GWN0125G
GWN0125H
GWN0166K
GWN01C5K
GWN01C5L
GWN01C5M
DATES:
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY:
Effective date 0901 UTC, June
22, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 71 / Friday, April 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Ready, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it establishes the restricted area airspace
at Chocolate Mountains, CA, to
accommodate essential USMC training
requirements and ensure the safety of
aircraft otherwise permitted to overfly
the location established for USMC
training.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
History
The FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) (80 FR 42761, July
20, 2015), Docket No. FAA–2015–2193,
to establish restricted area R–2507W to
support hazardous training activities
conducted within the Chocolate
Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range
(CMAGR), special use airspace (SUA)
complex.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal. One comment from the
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
(AOPA) was received.
Discussion of Comments
In their response to the NPRM, AOPA
raised several substantive issues. AOPA
contended the proposed airspace design
would have a negative impact on
general aviation aircraft highlighting
three main areas of concern: Proximity
to Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge;
impact on instrument approach into
Brawley Municipal Airport (BWC); and
impact on instrument approach into
Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport
(TRM).
Having considered the issues
provided by AOPA, the FAA offers the
following responses.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Apr 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
Proximity to Salton Sea National
Wildlife Refuge
AOPA indicated that pilots would
prefer additional buffer space between
aircraft and the refuge, but R–2057W
reduces that margin on the northern
coast of the Salton Sea National Wildlife
Refuge.
The FAA acknowledges the Salton
Sea National Wildlife Refuge is located
in close proximity to R–2507W and that
pilots are encouraged to avoid the
refuge, if practical, as Advisory Circular
91–36D states under the paragraph
‘Voluntary Practices.’ As alluded to by
AOPA’s comment, navigating along the
northern shoreline of the Salton Sea is
a common occurrence when operating
in the area. The closest point between
the proposed airspace and the refuge is
approximately 3.7 nautical miles. This
distance provides ample maneuver
space in a VFR environment for general
aviation pilots to avoid both the
proposed R–2507W and the wildlife
refuge. Additionally, it is important to
note that the recognizable geographic
boundary of the range from the air is the
canal that borders the range. In order to
ensure safety, the airspace utilizes that
geographic border to visually assist
general aviation in identifying the outer
edge of the restricted area. Moreover,
the R–2507W airspace overlays
Controlled Fire Areas which are
established over the Chocolate
Mountain Aerial Gunner Range. There
are no records at Marine Corps Air
Station, Yuma, of having to take any
actions to put the Controlled Fire Areas
in cease-fire status due to general
aviation activity in/around the
underlying ranges. For these reasons,
the FAA disagrees that additional
clearance is necessary.
Impact on Instrument Approach Into
Brawley Municipal Airport (BWC)
AOPA also expressed concern that an
aircraft inbound to BWC via the VOR/
DME B approach originating from the
Thermal VORTAC must fly 35 miles to
SECAN intersection which is found by
cross referencing with the Imperial
VORTAC. AOPA suggested that pilot
solely utilizing VOR guidance could
stray north near the restricted area.
The FAA acknowledges that a pilot
flying the VOR/DME B approach
procedure into BWC and navigating
solely off of one VOR has cockpit
workload to consider. However, the
FAA considers the cockpit workload a
factor at the intersection due to
switching from VOR to VOR for
guidance on when to make the turn does
not present any safety concern
associated with the establishment of R–
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17937
2507W. The pilot’s potential to stray
beyond the intersection or missing the
turn would take the pilot away from the
restricted area rather than closer to it.
The FAA recognizes ample
maneuverability room to complete the
initial inbound radial of the approach to
the SECAN intersection without being
in jeopardy of straying into the new R–
2507W.
Impact on Instrument Approach Into
Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport
(TRM)
AOPA is concerned the RNAV GPS
runway 35 approach will lose safe
distance off of the SHADI intersection
from the restricted airspace. The FAA
concurs with the comment that the
feeder route of SHADI intersection to
the COSUK intersection (which is an
initial approach fix) would be reduced
to an unacceptable distance. Therefore,
the FAA has reduced the boundary of
the northwest corner of R–2507W to
provide sufficient protected airspace
from the RNAV (GPS) runway 35
approach.
Differences From the NPRM
Subsequent to publication of the
NPRM, in response to a comment from
AOPA, the FAA identified a geographic
lat./long. coordinate which was adjusted
into two geographic lat./long.
coordinates to ensure ample separation
from the TRM RNAV GPS runway 35
approach feeder route off of SHADI
intersection, which is an established
approach procedure. The following
restricted area updates are incorporated
in this action.
The geographical lat./long. coordinate
for the point located in the northwest
corner of R–2507W has been removed
and two new points were established.
The Rule
The FAA is amending title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 to
establish a new restricted area R–2507W
at the Chocolate Mountain Aerial
Gunnery Range, CA. The FAA is also
incorporating the restricted area updates
noted in the Differences from the NPRM
section. The FAA is taking this action to
ensure realistic USMC training on live
fire and non-live fire aviation activities
such as Basic Ordinance Delivery, Close
Air Support, Air-to-Air Gunnery, Laser
Ranging and Designating, and Air
Strikes. The changes from what was
proposed in the NPRM are as follows:
R–2507W: The geographic coordinate
proposed as ‘‘lat. 33°29′25″ N., long.
115°46′08″ W.’’ in the boundaries
description is deleted and replaced by
two points identified as ‘‘lat. 33°29′11″
N., long. 115°45′49″ W.’’ and ‘‘lat.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
17938
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 71 / Friday, April 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
33°29′36″ N., long. 115°45′36″ W.’’ The
rest of the legal description of R–2507W
is unchanged from the proposal.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action of establishing restricted area R–
2507W, Chocolate Mountain, CA, to
support USMC training activities that
involve the use of advanced weapons
systems, qualified for FAA’s
environmental impact review and
FAA’s adoption of the airspace use
portion of the USMC’s Final
Environmental Assessment (FEA). In
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), its
implementing regulations at 40 CFR
parts 1500 through 1508, FAA Orders
1050.1F Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures, and 7400.2K
Procedures for Handling Airspace
Matters, FAA, as a cooperating agency
for this SUA action, conducted an
independent environmental impact
review of the airspace use portion of the
USMC’s Air Station Yuma FEA for the
Establishment of Special Use Airspace
Restricted Area R–2507W, Chocolate
Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range,
Imperial and Riverside Counties,
California (June 2014). Based on its
review, the FAA has determined that
the action that is the subject of this rule
does not present any potential for
significant impacts to the human
environment. The FAA’s Adoption EA
and FONSI–ROD are included in the
docket for this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted
areas.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:38 Apr 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 73 as follows:
PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 73.25
California [Amended]
2. Section 73.25 is amended as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
R–2507W West Chocolate Mountains,
CA [New]
Boundaries—Beginning at lat.
33°14′00″ N., long. 115°22′33″ W.; to lat.
33°13′14″ N., long. 115°23′17″ W.; to lat.
33°13′58″ N., long. 115°24′26″ W.; to lat.
33°14′22″ N., long. 115°25′29″ W.; to lat.
33°15′40″ N., long. 115°27′36″ W.; to lat.
33°17′28″ N., long. 115°29′42″ W.; to lat.
33°19′17″ N., long. 115°32′13″ W.; to lat.
33°21′11″ N., long. 115°34′39″ W.; to lat.
33°22′58″ N., long. 115°38′19″ W.; to lat.
33°27′26″ N., long. 115°43′30″ W.; to lat.
33°29′11″ N., long. 115°45′49″ W.; to lat.
33°29′36″ N., long. 115°45′36″ W.; to lat.
33°31′09″ N., long. 115°41′12″ W.; to lat.
33°32′50″ N., long. 115°37′37″ W.; to lat.
33°32′40″ N., long. 115°33′53″ W.; to lat.
33°28′30″ N., long. 115°42′13″ W.; to lat.
33°23′40″ N., long. 115°33′23″ W.; to lat.
33°21′30″ N., long. 115°32′58″ W.;
thence to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. Surface to FL
230.
Time of designation. Continuous.
Controlling agency. FAA, Los Angeles
Air Route Traffic Control Center
(ARTCC).
Using agency. USMC, Commanding
Officer, Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Yuma, AZ.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 10,
2017.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2017–07573 Filed 4–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Part 4022
Benefits Payable in Terminated SingleEmployer Plans; Interest Assumptions
for Paying Benefits
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
This final rule amends the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s
regulation on Benefits Payable in
Terminated Single-Employer Plans to
prescribe interest assumptions under
the regulation for valuation dates in
May 2017. The interest assumptions are
used for paying benefits under
terminating single-employer plans
covered by the pension insurance
system administered by PBGC.
DATES: Effective May 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah C. Murphy (Murphy.Deborah@
pbgc.gov), Assistant General Counsel for
Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street
NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–
4400 ext. 3451. (TTY/TDD users may
call the Federal relay service toll-free at
1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4400 ext. 3451.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PBGC’s
regulation on Benefits Payable in
Terminated Single-Employer Plans (29
CFR part 4022) prescribes actuarial
assumptions—including interest
assumptions—for paying plan benefits
under terminating single-employer
plans covered by title IV of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974. The interest assumptions in
the regulation are also published on
PBGC’s Web site (https://www.pbgc.gov).
PBGC uses the interest assumptions in
Appendix B to part 4022 to determine
whether a benefit is payable as a lump
sum and to determine the amount to
pay. Appendix C to Part 4022 contains
interest assumptions for private-sector
pension practitioners to refer to if they
wish to use lump-sum interest rates
determined using PBGC’s historical
methodology. Currently, the rates in
Appendices B and C of the benefit
payment regulation are the same.
The interest assumptions are intended
to reflect current conditions in the
financial and annuity markets.
Assumptions under the benefit
payments regulation are updated
monthly. This final rule updates the
benefit payments interest assumptions
for May 2017.1
The May 2017 interest assumptions
under the benefit payments regulation
will be 1.00 percent for the period
during which a benefit is in pay status
and 4.00 percent during any years
preceding the benefit’s placement in pay
SUMMARY:
1 Appendix B to PBGC’s regulation on Allocation
of Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part
4044) prescribes interest assumptions for valuing
benefits under terminating covered single-employer
plans for purposes of allocation of assets under
ERISA section 4044. Those assumptions are
updated quarterly.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 71 (Friday, April 14, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17936-17938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07573]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA-2015-2193; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-8]
Establishment of Restricted Area R-2507W; Chocolate Mountains, CA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action establishes restricted area R-2507W, Chocolate
Mountains, CA, to support training activities that involve the use of
advanced weapons systems. This action ensures realistic United States
Marine Corps (USMC) training on live fire and non-live fire aviation
activities such as Basic Ordinance Delivery, Close Air Support, Air-to-
Air Gunnery, Laser Ranging and Designating, and Air Strikes. Restricted
area R-2507W will allow the USMC to enhance training and safety
requirements in order to maintain, train, and equip combat-ready
military forces.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, June 22, 2017.
[[Page 17937]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Ready, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes the restricted area airspace at Chocolate Mountains,
CA, to accommodate essential USMC training requirements and ensure the
safety of aircraft otherwise permitted to overfly the location
established for USMC training.
History
The FAA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) (80 FR 42761, July 20, 2015), Docket No. FAA-2015-
2193, to establish restricted area R-2507W to support hazardous
training activities conducted within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial
Gunnery Range (CMAGR), special use airspace (SUA) complex.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. One comment from
the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) was received.
Discussion of Comments
In their response to the NPRM, AOPA raised several substantive
issues. AOPA contended the proposed airspace design would have a
negative impact on general aviation aircraft highlighting three main
areas of concern: Proximity to Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge;
impact on instrument approach into Brawley Municipal Airport (BWC); and
impact on instrument approach into Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport
(TRM).
Having considered the issues provided by AOPA, the FAA offers the
following responses.
Proximity to Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge
AOPA indicated that pilots would prefer additional buffer space
between aircraft and the refuge, but R-2057W reduces that margin on the
northern coast of the Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge.
The FAA acknowledges the Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge is
located in close proximity to R-2507W and that pilots are encouraged to
avoid the refuge, if practical, as Advisory Circular 91-36D states
under the paragraph `Voluntary Practices.' As alluded to by AOPA's
comment, navigating along the northern shoreline of the Salton Sea is a
common occurrence when operating in the area. The closest point between
the proposed airspace and the refuge is approximately 3.7 nautical
miles. This distance provides ample maneuver space in a VFR environment
for general aviation pilots to avoid both the proposed R-2507W and the
wildlife refuge. Additionally, it is important to note that the
recognizable geographic boundary of the range from the air is the canal
that borders the range. In order to ensure safety, the airspace
utilizes that geographic border to visually assist general aviation in
identifying the outer edge of the restricted area. Moreover, the R-
2507W airspace overlays Controlled Fire Areas which are established
over the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunner Range. There are no records
at Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, of having to take any actions to put
the Controlled Fire Areas in cease-fire status due to general aviation
activity in/around the underlying ranges. For these reasons, the FAA
disagrees that additional clearance is necessary.
Impact on Instrument Approach Into Brawley Municipal Airport (BWC)
AOPA also expressed concern that an aircraft inbound to BWC via the
VOR/DME B approach originating from the Thermal VORTAC must fly 35
miles to SECAN intersection which is found by cross referencing with
the Imperial VORTAC. AOPA suggested that pilot solely utilizing VOR
guidance could stray north near the restricted area.
The FAA acknowledges that a pilot flying the VOR/DME B approach
procedure into BWC and navigating solely off of one VOR has cockpit
workload to consider. However, the FAA considers the cockpit workload a
factor at the intersection due to switching from VOR to VOR for
guidance on when to make the turn does not present any safety concern
associated with the establishment of R-2507W. The pilot's potential to
stray beyond the intersection or missing the turn would take the pilot
away from the restricted area rather than closer to it. The FAA
recognizes ample maneuverability room to complete the initial inbound
radial of the approach to the SECAN intersection without being in
jeopardy of straying into the new R-2507W.
Impact on Instrument Approach Into Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport
(TRM)
AOPA is concerned the RNAV GPS runway 35 approach will lose safe
distance off of the SHADI intersection from the restricted airspace.
The FAA concurs with the comment that the feeder route of SHADI
intersection to the COSUK intersection (which is an initial approach
fix) would be reduced to an unacceptable distance. Therefore, the FAA
has reduced the boundary of the northwest corner of R-2507W to provide
sufficient protected airspace from the RNAV (GPS) runway 35 approach.
Differences From the NPRM
Subsequent to publication of the NPRM, in response to a comment
from AOPA, the FAA identified a geographic lat./long. coordinate which
was adjusted into two geographic lat./long. coordinates to ensure ample
separation from the TRM RNAV GPS runway 35 approach feeder route off of
SHADI intersection, which is an established approach procedure. The
following restricted area updates are incorporated in this action.
The geographical lat./long. coordinate for the point located in the
northwest corner of R-2507W has been removed and two new points were
established.
The Rule
The FAA is amending title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 73 to establish a new restricted area R-2507W at the Chocolate
Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, CA. The FAA is also incorporating the
restricted area updates noted in the Differences from the NPRM section.
The FAA is taking this action to ensure realistic USMC training on live
fire and non-live fire aviation activities such as Basic Ordinance
Delivery, Close Air Support, Air-to-Air Gunnery, Laser Ranging and
Designating, and Air Strikes. The changes from what was proposed in the
NPRM are as follows:
R-2507W: The geographic coordinate proposed as ``lat.
33[deg]29'25'' N., long. 115[deg]46'08'' W.'' in the boundaries
description is deleted and replaced by two points identified as ``lat.
33[deg]29'11'' N., long. 115[deg]45'49'' W.'' and ``lat.
[[Page 17938]]
33[deg]29'36'' N., long. 115[deg]45'36'' W.'' The rest of the legal
description of R-2507W is unchanged from the proposal.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action of establishing restricted
area R-2507W, Chocolate Mountain, CA, to support USMC training
activities that involve the use of advanced weapons systems, qualified
for FAA's environmental impact review and FAA's adoption of the
airspace use portion of the USMC's Final Environmental Assessment
(FEA). In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
its implementing regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, FAA
Orders 1050.1F Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and
7400.2K Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters, FAA, as a cooperating
agency for this SUA action, conducted an independent environmental
impact review of the airspace use portion of the USMC's Air Station
Yuma FEA for the Establishment of Special Use Airspace Restricted Area
R-2507W, Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, Imperial and
Riverside Counties, California (June 2014). Based on its review, the
FAA has determined that the action that is the subject of this rule
does not present any potential for significant impacts to the human
environment. The FAA's Adoption EA and FONSI-ROD are included in the
docket for this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas.
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 73 as follows:
PART 73--SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 73.25 California [Amended]
0
2. Section 73.25 is amended as follows:
* * * * *
R-2507W West Chocolate Mountains, CA [New]
Boundaries--Beginning at lat. 33[deg]14'00'' N., long.
115[deg]22'33'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]13'14'' N., long. 115[deg]23'17''
W.; to lat. 33[deg]13'58'' N., long. 115[deg]24'26'' W.; to lat.
33[deg]14'22'' N., long. 115[deg]25'29'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]15'40'' N.,
long. 115[deg]27'36'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]17'28'' N., long.
115[deg]29'42'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]19'17'' N., long. 115[deg]32'13''
W.; to lat. 33[deg]21'11'' N., long. 115[deg]34'39'' W.; to lat.
33[deg]22'58'' N., long. 115[deg]38'19'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]27'26'' N.,
long. 115[deg]43'30'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]29'11'' N., long.
115[deg]45'49'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]29'36'' N., long. 115[deg]45'36''
W.; to lat. 33[deg]31'09'' N., long. 115[deg]41'12'' W.; to lat.
33[deg]32'50'' N., long. 115[deg]37'37'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]32'40'' N.,
long. 115[deg]33'53'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]28'30'' N., long.
115[deg]42'13'' W.; to lat. 33[deg]23'40'' N., long. 115[deg]33'23''
W.; to lat. 33[deg]21'30'' N., long. 115[deg]32'58'' W.; thence to the
point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. Surface to FL 230.
Time of designation. Continuous.
Controlling agency. FAA, Los Angeles Air Route Traffic Control
Center (ARTCC).
Using agency. USMC, Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Yuma, AZ.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 10, 2017.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2017-07573 Filed 4-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P