Notice of Public Comment Period on Advancing Forensic Science, 17879-17881 [2017-07512]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. If Defendants’ Antitrust
Compliance Officer learns of any
allegations of a violation of any of the
terms and conditions contained in this
Final Judgment, Defendants shall
immediately investigate to determine if
a violation has occurred and appropriate
action is required to comply with this
Final Judgment. If Defendants’ Antitrust
Compliance Officer learns of any
violation of any of the terms and
conditions contained in this Final
Judgment, Defendants shall immediately
take appropriate action to terminate or
modify the activity so as to comply with
this Final Judgment. Defendants shall
report any such investigation or action
in the annual compliance statement
required by Section VI(B).
D. If Defendants’ Antitrust
Compliance Officer learns any
Competitively Sensitive Information has
been communicated from an MVPD to
any person identified in Sections
V(B)(1) and (2), excluding those
communications consistent with
Sections IV(D), (E), (F), (G) and (H), the
Antitrust Compliance Officer shall
instruct that person that he or she must
not consider the Competitively
Sensitive Information in any way, shall
advise counsel for the MVPD which
communicated the Competitively
Sensitive Information that such
information must not be communicated
to Defendants, and report the
circumstances of the Communication of
the Competitively Sensitive Information
and the response by the Antitrust
Compliance Officer in the annual
compliance statement required by
Section VI(B).
VI. CERTIFICATION
A. Within sixty (60) days after entry
of this Final Judgment, Defendants shall
certify to Plaintiff whether they have
designated an Antitrust Compliance
Officer and have distributed the Final
Judgment in accordance with Section
V(B) above. This certification shall
include the name, title, business
address, email address, and business
phone number of the Person designated
as Antitrust Compliance Officer.
B. For the term of this Final Judgment,
on or before its anniversary date,
Defendants shall file with the Plaintiff
an annual statement as to the fact and
manner of its compliance with the
provisions of Section V, including the
record(s) created in accordance with
Section V(B)(4) above.
VII. COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
A. For purposes of determining or
securing compliance with this Final
Judgment, or of determining whether
this Final Judgment should be modified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Apr 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
or vacated, and subject to any legally
recognized privilege, from time to time
authorized representatives of the United
States Department of Justice, including
consultants and other persons retained
by the United States shall, upon written
request of an authorized representative
of the Assistant Attorney General in
charge of the Antitrust Division, and on
reasonable notice to Defendants, be
permitted:
1. access during Defendants’ office
hours to inspect and copy, or at the
United States’ option, to require
Defendants and their members to
provide copies of all books, ledgers,
accounts, records, and documents in
their possession, custody, or control,
relating to any matters contained in this
Final Judgment; and
2. to interview, either informally or on
the record, Defendants’ officers,
employees, or other representatives,
who may have their individual counsel
present, regarding such matters. The
interviews shall be subject to the
reasonable convenience of the
interviewee and without restraint or
interference by Defendants.
B. Upon the written request of an
authorized representative of the
Assistant Attorney General in charge of
the Antitrust Division, Defendants shall
submit written reports and interrogatory
responses, under oath if requested,
relating to any of the matters contained
in this Final Judgment as may be
requested.
C. No information or documents
obtained by the means provided in this
section shall be divulged by the United
States to any person other than an
authorized representative of the
executive branch of the United States,
except in the course of legal proceedings
to which the United States is a party
(including grand jury proceedings), or
for the purpose of securing compliance
with this Final Judgment, or as
otherwise required by law.
D. If at the time information or
documents are furnished by Defendants
to the United States, Defendants identify
in writing the material in any such
information or documents to which a
claim of protection may be asserted
under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, and Defendants mark
each pertinent page of such material,
‘‘Subject to claim of protection under
Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States
shall give ten (10) calendar days notice
prior to divulging such material in any
legal proceeding (other than a grand jury
proceeding).
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17879
VIII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
This Court retains jurisdiction to
enable any party to this Final Judgment
to apply to this Court at any time for
further orders and directions as may be
necessary or appropriate to carry out or
construe this Final Judgment, to modify
any of its provisions, to enforce
compliance, and to punish violations of
its provisions.
IX. EXPIRATION OF FINAL
JUDGMENT
Unless this Court grants an extension,
this Final Judgment shall expire five (5)
years from its date of entry.
X. PUBLIC INTEREST
DETERMINATION
The parties have complied with the
requirements of the Antitrust
Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 16, including making copies available
to the public of this Final Judgment, the
Competitive Impact Statement, and any
comments thereon and the United
States’ responses to comments. Based
upon the record before the Court, which
includes the Competitive Impact
Statement and any comments and
responses to comments filed with the
Court, entry of this Final Judgment is in
the public interest.
SO ORDERED:
Dated:__2017
Michael W. Fitzgerald
United States District Judge
[FR Doc. 2017–07463 Filed 4–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Docket No. OLP 160]
Notice of Public Comment Period on
Advancing Forensic Science
Department of Justice.
Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
It is the Department’s mission
to ensure public safety and provide
federal leadership in preventing and
controlling crime. Advancing the
practice of forensic science is an
important part of that effort. The more
effective a forensic system we have, the
better equipped we are to solve crimes,
more swiftly absolving the innocent and
bringing the guilty to justice. The
second term of the National
Commission on Forensic Science
(NCFS) is set to expire on April 23,
2017. As part of the Department’s
continued efforts to advance the
practice of forensic science following
NCFS’s expiration, the Department is
seeking comment on how the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17880
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Notices
Department should move forward to
evaluate and improve the underlying
science of forensic evidence; improve
the operational management systems of
forensic science service providers; and
improve the understanding of forensic
science by legal practitioners.
DATES: Written public comment
regarding the issue for comment should
be submitted through
www.regulations.gov before June 9,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Legal Policy, 950 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530, by
phone at 202–514–4601 or via email at
Forensics.OLP@usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
February 2013, the U.S. Department of
Justice and the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST)
announced a partnership that included
the formation of the National
Commission on Forensic Science
(NCFS). The NCFS is one of several
federal initiatives relating to forensic
science that was created following the
2009 report by the National Academy of
Sciences National Research Council on
‘‘Strengthening Forensic Science in the
United States: A Path Forward.’’ NCFS
was established under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act to provide
advice and recommendations to the
Attorney General on: (1) Strengthening
the reliability and usefulness of the
forensic sciences (including medicolegal
death investigation); (2) enhancing
quality assurance and quality control in
forensic science laboratories and units;
(3) identifying and recommending
scientific guidance and protocols for
evidence seizure, testing, analysis, and
reporting by forensic science
laboratories and units; and (4)
identifying and assessing other needs of
the forensic science communities to
strengthen their disciplines and meet
the increasing demands generated by
the criminal and civil justice systems at
all levels of government.
The NCFS charter identifies six goals:
(1) To recommend priorities for
standards development to the Attorney
General; (2) to review and recommend
guidance identified or developed by
subject-matter experts; (3) to develop
proposed guidance concerning the
intersection of forensic science and the
courtroom; (4) to develop policy
recommendations, including a uniform
code of professional responsibility and
minimum requirements for training,
accreditation, and certification; (5) to
consider the recommendations of the
National Science and Technology
Council’s Subcommittee on Forensic
Science; and (6) to identify and assess
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Apr 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
the current and future needs of the
forensic sciences to strengthen their
disciplines and meet growing demands.
The NCFS’s supporting documents,
including current charter, bylaws, and
work product development guidance,
are available for review at https://
www.justice.gov/ncfs and https://
www.justice.gov/ncfs/work-products.
Federal advisory committees operate
on two-year renewable terms. Term 1 for
NCFS began on April 23, 2013, when
the original charter was filed, and
concluded on April 23, 2015. NCFS was
renewed for Term 2, which expires on
April 23, 2017. Over the last 3 years (as
of April 9, 2017), NCFS developed 43
work products, including 20
recommendations to the Attorney
General, to support these goals. The
NCFS has met its initial mandate, and
in light of the upcoming expiration of its
charter, the Department is now
considering appropriate next steps.
Issue for Comment—Commenters are
requested to identify proposals to: (1)
Improve the underlying science and
validity of forensic evidence; (2)
improve the operational management
systems of forensic science service
providers; and (3) improve the
understanding of forensic science by
legal practitioners.
In formulating a proposal,
commenters may wish to consider the
following questions:
(A) What are the biggest needs in
forensic science inside the Department
and at the federal, state, local, and tribal
level?
(B) What is required to improve
forensic science practices at the federal,
state, local, and tribal levels?
(C) What is needed to improve
capacity at federal, state, local, and
tribal levels?
(D) What are the barriers to improving
capacity and what resources are needed
to overcome those barriers?
(E) What are the specific issues
related to digital forensic evidence
analysis and how can the Department
address those needs?
(F) How should the Department, or
any Department entity, coordinate with
the Organization of Scientific Area
Committees?
(G) What resources and relationships
can the Department draw on to ensure
thoughtful and representative input?
Proposals may include some
combination of a Federal Advisory
Committee, a new office at the
Department, an inter-agency working
group, regularly scheduled stakeholder
meetings, etc. If the commenter believes
a Federal Advisory Committee structure
is appropriate, commenters are
encouraged to address structural issues
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
such as size, membership, work product
development process, reporting
structure (i.e., to whom
recommendations are provided),
opportunity for public comment, and
opportunity for robust debate among
members.
Posting of Public Comments: To
ensure proper handling of comments,
please reference ‘‘Docket No. OLP 160’’
on all electronic and written
correspondence. The Department
encourages all comments be submitted
electronically through
www.regulations.gov. Paper comments
that duplicate the electronic submission
are not necessary as all comments
submitted to www.regulations.gov will
be posted for public review and are part
of the official docket record.
In accordance with the Federal
Records Act, please note that all
comments received are considered part
of the public record, and shall be made
available for public inspection online at
www.regulations.gov. The comments to
be posted may include personally
identifiable information (such as your
name, address, etc.) and confidential
business information voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
The Department will post all
comments received on
www.regulations.gov without making
any changes to the comments or
redacting any information, including
any personally identifiable information
provided. It is the responsibility of the
commenter to safeguard personally
identifiable information. You are not
required to submit personally
identifying information in order to
comment and the Department
recommends that commenters not
include personally identifiable
information such as Social Security
Numbers, personal addresses, telephone
numbers, and email addresses that they
do not want made public in their
comments as such submitted
information will be available to the
public via www.regulations.gov.
Comments may be provided
anonymously, but those commenters
who do share contact information are
requested to include brief background
information regarding commenter
subject-matter experience and expertise.
Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov will not include
the email address of the commenter
unless the commenter chooses to
include that information as part of his
or her comment.
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 70 / Thursday, April 13, 2017 / Notices
Dated: April 10, 2017.
Kira Antell,
Senior Counsel, Office of Legal Policy.
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. Georgia Coastal Land
Co., et al., No. 2:16–cv–00060–LGW–
RSB, was lodged with the United States
District Court for the Southern District
of Georgia on April 7, 2017.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Georgia Coastal
Land Company, Provident Land
Holdings Company, Provident
Construction Company, and William L.
Nutting, pursuant to Sections 301, 309,
and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1311(a), 1319(g)(9), and 1344(s),
to obtain injunctive relief from and
impose civil penalties against the
Defendants for violating the Clean Water
Act by discharging pollutants without a
permit into waters of the United States.
The proposed Consent Decree resolves
these allegations by requiring the
Defendants to restore impacted areas
and perform mitigation, and to pay civil
and administrative penalties.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Samara Spence, Trial Attorney for the
United States Department of Justice,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, Environmental Defense
Section, Post Office Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044 and refer to
United States v. Georgia Coastal Land
Co., et al., DJ #90–5–1–1–20782.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the Southern
District of Georgia, Brunswick Division,
801 Gloucester Street, Brunswick, GA
31520. In addition, the proposed
Consent Decree may be examined
electronically at https://www.justice.gov/
enrd/consent-decrees.
Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment and Natural
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017–07499 Filed 4–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Apr 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Allowable Meal Charge
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[FR Doc. 2017–07512 Filed 4–12–17; 8:45 am]
Labor Certification Process for the
Temporary Employment of H–2A and
H–2B Foreign Workers in the United
States: 2017 Allowable Charges for
Agricultural Workers’ Meals and for
Travel Subsistence Reimbursement,
Including Lodging
Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Employment and
Training Administration of the
Department of Labor is issuing this
Notice to announce: (1) The allowable
charges for 2017 that employers seeking
H–2A workers in occupations other than
range herding may charge their workers
when the employer provides three
meals a day, and (2) the maximum
travel subsistence meal reimbursement
that a worker with receipts may claim
in 2017 under the H–2A and H–2B
programs. The Notice also includes a
reminder regarding employers’
obligations with respect to overnight
lodging costs as part of required
subsistence.
DATES: Effective on April 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William W. Thompson, II,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor
Certification (OFLC), U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room PPII–12–200, Washington, DC
20210. Telephone: 202–513–7350 (this
is not a toll-free number). Individuals
with hearing or speech impairments
may access the telephone number above
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States (U.S.) Citizenship and
Immigration Services of the Department
of Homeland Security will not approve
an employer’s petition for the admission
of H–2A or H–2B nonimmigrant
temporary workers in the U.S. unless
the petitioner has received from the
DOL an H–2A or H–2B labor
certification. Both the H–2A and H–2B
labor certifications provide that: (1)
There are not sufficient U.S. workers
who are qualified and who will be
available to perform the labor or
services involved in the petition; and (2)
the employment of the foreign worker(s)
in such labor or services will not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of workers in the U.S.
similarly employed. See 20 CFR
655.1(a)(H–2B); 20 CFR 655.100 (H–2A).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17881
Among the minimum benefits and
working conditions that the Department
requires employers to offer their U.S.
and H–2A workers who are not engaged
in range occupations are three meals a
day or free and convenient cooking and
kitchen facilities so workers may
prepare their own meals.1 See 20 CFR
655.122(g). Where the employer
provides the meals, the job offer must
state the charge, if any, to the worker for
such meals. Id.
The Department establishes the
methodology for determining the
maximum amounts that H–2A
agricultural employers may charge their
U.S. and foreign workers for providing
them with three meals per day during
employment. See 20 CFR 655.173(a).
This methodology allows for annual
adjustments of the previous year’s
maximum allowable charge based upon
updated U.S. Consumer Price Index for
All Urban Consumers (CPI–U) data for
Food, not seasonally adjusted. Id. The
maximum charge allowed by 20 CFR
655.122(g) is adjusted by the same
percentage as the 12-month percent
change in the CPI for all Urban
Consumers for Food (CPI–U for
Food).2 Id. The OFLC Certifying Officer
may also permit an employer to charge
workers a higher amount for providing
them with three meals a day, if the
higher amount is justified and
sufficiently documented by the
employer, as set forth in 20 CFR
655.173(b).
The percentage change in the CPI–U
for Food between December 2015 and
December 2016 was –0.2 percent.3
Accordingly, the maximum allowable
charge under 20 CFR 655.122(g) shall be
no more than $12.07 per day, unless the
OFLC Certifying Officer approves a
higher charge as authorized under 20
CFR 655.173(b).
Reimbursement for Daily Travel
Subsistence
The H–2A regulations (20 CFR
655.122(h)(1)) and the H–2B regulations
(20 CFR 655.20(j)(1)(i)) establish that the
minimum daily travel subsistence
expense for meals, for which a worker
is entitled to reimbursement, must be at
1 H–2A employers must provide workers engaged
in herding or the production of livestock on the
range meals or food to prepare meals without
charge or deposit charge. See 20 CFR 655.210(e).
2 The 12-month percent change in the CPI–U for
Food for 2006 through 2016 is available through
BLS’ Web site at https://www.bls.gov/cpi/.
3 In 2016, the maximum allowable charge under
20 CFR 655.122(g) was $12.09 per day. 81 FR 9885,
9886 (Feb. 26, 2016). As a result, the maximum
allowable meal charge for 2017 has decreased only
$.02.
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 70 (Thursday, April 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17879-17881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Docket No. OLP 160]
Notice of Public Comment Period on Advancing Forensic Science
AGENCY: Department of Justice.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the Department's mission to ensure public safety and
provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime.
Advancing the practice of forensic science is an important part of that
effort. The more effective a forensic system we have, the better
equipped we are to solve crimes, more swiftly absolving the innocent
and bringing the guilty to justice. The second term of the National
Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) is set to expire on April 23,
2017. As part of the Department's continued efforts to advance the
practice of forensic science following NCFS's expiration, the
Department is seeking comment on how the
[[Page 17880]]
Department should move forward to evaluate and improve the underlying
science of forensic evidence; improve the operational management
systems of forensic science service providers; and improve the
understanding of forensic science by legal practitioners.
DATES: Written public comment regarding the issue for comment should be
submitted through www.regulations.gov before June 9, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Legal Policy, 950
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530, by phone at 202-514-4601
or via email at Forensics.OLP@usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In February 2013, the U.S. Department of
Justice and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
announced a partnership that included the formation of the National
Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS). The NCFS is one of several
federal initiatives relating to forensic science that was created
following the 2009 report by the National Academy of Sciences National
Research Council on ``Strengthening Forensic Science in the United
States: A Path Forward.'' NCFS was established under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act to provide advice and recommendations to the
Attorney General on: (1) Strengthening the reliability and usefulness
of the forensic sciences (including medicolegal death investigation);
(2) enhancing quality assurance and quality control in forensic science
laboratories and units; (3) identifying and recommending scientific
guidance and protocols for evidence seizure, testing, analysis, and
reporting by forensic science laboratories and units; and (4)
identifying and assessing other needs of the forensic science
communities to strengthen their disciplines and meet the increasing
demands generated by the criminal and civil justice systems at all
levels of government.
The NCFS charter identifies six goals: (1) To recommend priorities
for standards development to the Attorney General; (2) to review and
recommend guidance identified or developed by subject-matter experts;
(3) to develop proposed guidance concerning the intersection of
forensic science and the courtroom; (4) to develop policy
recommendations, including a uniform code of professional
responsibility and minimum requirements for training, accreditation,
and certification; (5) to consider the recommendations of the National
Science and Technology Council's Subcommittee on Forensic Science; and
(6) to identify and assess the current and future needs of the forensic
sciences to strengthen their disciplines and meet growing demands. The
NCFS's supporting documents, including current charter, bylaws, and
work product development guidance, are available for review at https://www.justice.gov/ncfs and https://www.justice.gov/ncfs/work-products.
Federal advisory committees operate on two-year renewable terms.
Term 1 for NCFS began on April 23, 2013, when the original charter was
filed, and concluded on April 23, 2015. NCFS was renewed for Term 2,
which expires on April 23, 2017. Over the last 3 years (as of April 9,
2017), NCFS developed 43 work products, including 20 recommendations to
the Attorney General, to support these goals. The NCFS has met its
initial mandate, and in light of the upcoming expiration of its
charter, the Department is now considering appropriate next steps.
Issue for Comment--Commenters are requested to identify proposals
to: (1) Improve the underlying science and validity of forensic
evidence; (2) improve the operational management systems of forensic
science service providers; and (3) improve the understanding of
forensic science by legal practitioners.
In formulating a proposal, commenters may wish to consider the
following questions:
(A) What are the biggest needs in forensic science inside the
Department and at the federal, state, local, and tribal level?
(B) What is required to improve forensic science practices at the
federal, state, local, and tribal levels?
(C) What is needed to improve capacity at federal, state, local,
and tribal levels?
(D) What are the barriers to improving capacity and what resources
are needed to overcome those barriers?
(E) What are the specific issues related to digital forensic
evidence analysis and how can the Department address those needs?
(F) How should the Department, or any Department entity, coordinate
with the Organization of Scientific Area Committees?
(G) What resources and relationships can the Department draw on to
ensure thoughtful and representative input?
Proposals may include some combination of a Federal Advisory
Committee, a new office at the Department, an inter-agency working
group, regularly scheduled stakeholder meetings, etc. If the commenter
believes a Federal Advisory Committee structure is appropriate,
commenters are encouraged to address structural issues such as size,
membership, work product development process, reporting structure
(i.e., to whom recommendations are provided), opportunity for public
comment, and opportunity for robust debate among members.
Posting of Public Comments: To ensure proper handling of comments,
please reference ``Docket No. OLP 160'' on all electronic and written
correspondence. The Department encourages all comments be submitted
electronically through www.regulations.gov. Paper comments that
duplicate the electronic submission are not necessary as all comments
submitted to www.regulations.gov will be posted for public review and
are part of the official docket record.
In accordance with the Federal Records Act, please note that all
comments received are considered part of the public record, and shall
be made available for public inspection online at www.regulations.gov.
The comments to be posted may include personally identifiable
information (such as your name, address, etc.) and confidential
business information voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
The Department will post all comments received on
www.regulations.gov without making any changes to the comments or
redacting any information, including any personally identifiable
information provided. It is the responsibility of the commenter to
safeguard personally identifiable information. You are not required to
submit personally identifying information in order to comment and the
Department recommends that commenters not include personally
identifiable information such as Social Security Numbers, personal
addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses that they do not want
made public in their comments as such submitted information will be
available to the public via www.regulations.gov. Comments may be
provided anonymously, but those commenters who do share contact
information are requested to include brief background information
regarding commenter subject-matter experience and expertise. Comments
submitted through www.regulations.gov will not include the email
address of the commenter unless the commenter chooses to include that
information as part of his or her comment.
[[Page 17881]]
Dated: April 10, 2017.
Kira Antell,
Senior Counsel, Office of Legal Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-07512 Filed 4-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P