Order Denying Export Privileges In the Matter of: Sam Rafic Ghanem, 6714 Forsythia Street, Springfield, VA 22150, 17187-17188 [2017-06813]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 67 / Monday, April 10, 2017 / Notices
Dated: April 5, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–07103 Filed 4–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges In the
Matter of: Sam Rafic Ghanem, 6714
Forsythia Street, Springfield, VA 22150
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On August 12, 2015, in the U.S.
District Court for the District of
Maryland, Sam Rafic Ghanem
(‘‘Ghanem’’), was convicted of violating
section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’).
Specifically, Ghanem willfully
attempted to export and cause the
exportation of firearms parts and
accessories designated as defense
articles under Category I of the United
States Munitions List from the United
States to Lebanon without having first
obtained the required license or
authorization from the U.S. Department
of State, Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls. Ghanem was sentenced 18
months in prison, three years of
supervised release, a criminal fine of
$70,734.24, and a $200 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2016). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601–4623
(Supp. III 2015) (available at https://uscode.
house.gov)). Since August 21, 2001, the Act has
been in lapse and the President, through Executive
Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001
Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by
successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 4, 2016 (81 FR 52,587 (Aug.
8, 2016)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Apr 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
of export privileges under this provision
may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR
766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). In
addition, section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that the Bureau of
Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
BIS has received notice of Ghanem’s
conviction for violating the AECA, and
has provided notice and an opportunity
for Ghanem to make a written
submission to BIS, as provided in
section 766.25 of the Regulations.
Ghanem requested an extension of time
to make a written submission to BIS,
which was granted, but BIS did not
receive a submission from Ghanem.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Ghanem’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of 10 years from the date of
Ghanem’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Ghanem had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
August 12, 2025, Sam Rafic Ghanem,
with a last known address of 6714
Forsythia Street, Springfield, VA 22150,
and when acting for or on his behalf, his
successors, assigns, employees, agents
or representatives (the ‘‘Denied
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17187
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Ghanem by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with part 756 of
the Regulations, Ghanem may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Ghanem. This Order
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
17188
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 67 / Monday, April 10, 2017 / Notices
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until August 12, 2025.
Issued: March 31, 2017.
Hillary Hess,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–06813 Filed 4–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–964]
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and
Tube From the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 22, 2017, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘CIT’’) issued its final judgment
in litigation pursuant to the third
antidumping duty administrative review
of seamless refined copper pipe and
tube from the People’s Republic of
China, sustaining the final results of
remand redetermination pursuant to
court order by the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’). The
Department is notifying the public that
the final judgment in this case is not in
harmony with the Department’s final
results of the antidumping
administrative review, and the
Department is amending those final
results with respect to the weightedaverage dumping margin assigned to
Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube
Group, Inc., Hong Kong GD Trading Co.,
Ltd., and Golden Dragon Holding (Hong
Kong) International, Ltd. (collectively,
‘‘Golden Dragon’’).
DATES: Effective Date: April 3, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance—International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On June 15, 2015, the Department
published the Final Results.1 On June
1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 80 FR 32087 (June 5, 2015) (‘‘Final Results’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:02 Apr 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
24, 2015, Golden Dragon, the
respondent in the underlying
proceeding, timely filed a complaint
with the CIT to challenge certain aspects
of the Final Results. On July 21, 2016,
the CIT remanded the Final Results to
the Department to further explain or
reconsider the application of the valueadded tax (‘‘VAT’’) adjustment to the
export price of Golden Dragon.2 On
February 7, 2017, the Department issued
its Remand Results, in which the
Department determined that all of the
copper cathode inputs used by Golden
Dragon in the production of subject
merchandise were VAT-exempt.3
On March 22, 2017, the CIT sustained
the Department’s Remand Results, and
entered final judgment.4
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken Co. v.
United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010) (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department must publish a
notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Department
determination, and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
March 22, 2017, judgment sustaining
the Department’s Remand Results
constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with the
Department’s Final Results. This notice
is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Accordingly, the Department will
continue the suspension of liquidation
of the subject merchandise pending the
expiration of the period of appeal, or if
appealed, pending a final and
conclusive court decision.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, the Department is amending
its Final Results with respect to Golden
Dragon’s weighted-average dumping
margin. The revised weighted-average
dumping margin for Golden Dragon
during the period November 1, 2012,
through October 31, 2013, is as follows:
Exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(%)
Golden Dragon Precise Copper
Tube Group, Inc., Hong Kong
GD Trading Co., Ltd., and
Golden Dragon Holding (Hong
Kong) International, Ltd ..........
6.09
In the event the CIT’s ruling is not
appealed or, if appealed, is upheld by a
final and conclusive court decision, the
Department will instruct the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to assess
antidumping duties on unliquidated
entries of subject merchandise based on
the revised rate calculated by the
Department in the Remand Results, and
listed above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because there have been subsequent
administrative reviews for Golden
Dragon, the cash deposit rate will
remain the rate published in the 2013–
2014 Final Results, which is 0.00
percent.5
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 4, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–07105 Filed 4–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) has received
requests to conduct administrative
reviews of various antidumping and
countervailing duty orders and findings
with February anniversary dates. In
accordance with the Department’s
AGENCY:
2 See
Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group,
Inc., Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd., Golden
Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.,
and GD Copper (U.S.A.) Inc., v. United States, Slip
Op. 16–73, Court No. 15–00177 (CIT 2016) .
3 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Order, Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube
Group, Inc., Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd.,
Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International,
Ltd., and GD Copper (U.S.A.) Inc., v. United States,
Consol. Court No. 15–00177 (February 7, 2017)
(‘‘Remand Results’’).
4 See Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group,
Inc., Hong Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd., Golden
Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.,
and GD Copper (U.S.A.) Inc., v. United States, Slip
Op. 17–29, Court No. 15–00177 (CIT 2017) .
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014, 81 FR 39893, 39894 (June 20, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 67 (Monday, April 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17187-17188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06813]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Denying Export Privileges In the Matter of: Sam Rafic
Ghanem, 6714 Forsythia Street, Springfield, VA 22150
On August 12, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Maryland, Sam Rafic Ghanem (``Ghanem''), was convicted of violating
section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2012))
(``AECA''). Specifically, Ghanem willfully attempted to export and
cause the exportation of firearms parts and accessories designated as
defense articles under Category I of the United States Munitions List
from the United States to Lebanon without having first obtained the
required license or authorization from the U.S. Department of State,
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Ghanem was sentenced 18 months
in prison, three years of supervised release, a criminal fine of
$70,734.24, and a $200 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (``EAA''), the EAR, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial of export
privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
4610(h). In addition, section 750.8 of the Regulations states that the
Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of Exporter Services may
revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS'') licenses
previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2016). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601-
4623 (Supp. III 2015) (available at https://uscode.house.gov)). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President,
through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp.
783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 4, 2016 (81 FR 52,587
(Aug. 8, 2016)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.
(2006 & Supp. IV 2010)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIS has received notice of Ghanem's conviction for violating the
AECA, and has provided notice and an opportunity for Ghanem to make a
written submission to BIS, as provided in section 766.25 of the
Regulations. Ghanem requested an extension of time to make a written
submission to BIS, which was granted, but BIS did not receive a
submission from Ghanem.
Based upon my review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export
Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I
have decided to deny Ghanem's export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of 10 years from the date of Ghanem's conviction. I have
also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or
Regulations in which Ghanem had an interest at the time of his
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until August 12, 2025, Sam Rafic
Ghanem, with a last known address of 6714 Forsythia Street,
Springfield, VA 22150, and when acting for or on his behalf, his
successors, assigns, employees, agents or representatives (the ``Denied
Person''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations,
including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Ghanem by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with part 756 of the Regulations, Ghanem may
file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the
date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of part 756 of
the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Ghanem. This
Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
[[Page 17188]]
Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in
effect until August 12, 2025.
Issued: March 31, 2017.
Hillary Hess,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017-06813 Filed 4-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P