Air Plan Approval; Tennessee: Reasonable Measures Required, 16927-16930 [2017-06877]
Download as PDF
16927
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 6, 2017. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 17, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.770, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘2–6–1’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana
citation
Indiana
effective date
Subject
EPA approval date
Comments
Article 2. Permit Review Rules
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 6. Emission Reporting
2–6–1
Applicability ...........................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
11/20/2016
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–06887 Filed 4–6–17; 8:45 am]
4/7/2017, [insert Federal Register citation] .........
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 52
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
[EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0575; FRL–9960–57–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Tennessee:
Reasonable Measures Required
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:50 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
........................
*
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC),
on March 25, 1999. The SIP submittal
includes a change to the TDEC
regulation ‘‘Reasonable Measures
Required.’’ EPA is proposing to approve
this SIP revision because it is consistent
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and
federal regulations governing SIPs.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
16928
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
This direct final rule is effective
June 6, 2017 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by May 8, 2017. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2016–0575 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers
can be reached via telephone at (404)
562–9089 and via electronic mail at
akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
DATES:
I. Background
On March 25, 1999, TDEC submitted
a change to the Tennessee rules to EPA
for approval and incorporation into the
Tennessee SIP. Specifically, the
submittal includes a change to remove
a portion of text from Tennessee Air
Pollution Control Regulation (TAPCR)
Rule 1200–3–20–.02, ‘‘Reasonable
Measures Required,’’ at paragraph (1).
Existing paragraph (1) covers measures
that air contaminant sources must take
during periods of startup and shutdown
and the treatment of equipment failures
that are not considered to be
malfunctions. This provision was
originally submitted by TDEC as part of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:50 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
Chapter 1200–3–20, ‘‘Limits on
Emissions Due to Malfunctions, Startups, and Shutdowns’’ on February 13,
1979, and approved by EPA on February
6, 1980 (45 FR 8004).1
II. Analysis of State’s Submittal
The current SIP-approved version of
TAPCR 1200–3–20–.02 provides, in
part, that for sources that are in or are
significantly affecting a nonattainment
area, ‘‘failures that are caused by poor
maintenance, careless operation or any
other preventable upset condition or
preventable equipment breakdown shall
not be considered malfunctions, and
shall be considered in violation of the
emission standard exceeded and this
rule.’’ The March 25, 1999, submittal
modifies the treatment of those
equipment failures that are not
considered malfunctions by removing
the statement that such failures ‘‘shall
be considered in violation of the
emission standard exceeded and this
rule.’’ 2 This rule change simply
eliminates language indicating that a
source which experiences an equipment
failure is automatically in violation of
applicable emission standards and the
Tennessee rule. EPA believes this
change is appropriate because an
instance of equipment failure does not
always result in an exceedance of an
emission standard. In addition, EPA
notes that, in accordance with TAPCR
1200–3–13–.01, any preventable failure
to properly operate control equipment
may still be in violation of emission
control requirements contained in
specific emission standards of the
Tennessee SIP.
This SIP revision does not provide an
exemption for any applicable emission
standards, nor does it modify any
applicable requirements for air
contaminant sources. With this change,
all applicable emission standards will
continue to apply during all times. EPA
is approving this revision because it is
consistent with the CAA.
III. Start Up, Shutdown, and
Malfunction (SSM) SIP Call
Considerations
In this action, EPA is not approving
or disapproving revisions to any
1 The current SIP-approved version of paragraph
(1) of Chapter 1200–3–20–.02 is the version that
became state-effective on February 13, 1977. 40 CFR
52.2220(c).
2 The provision at TAPCR 1200–3–20–.02(1) in
the March 25, 1999, submittal does not include the
phrase ‘‘[f]or sources identified in Chapter 1200–3–
19, or by a permit condition or an order issued by
the Board or by the Technical Secretary as being in
or significantly affecting a nonattainment area,’’
which is currently approved into the SIP. However,
EPA is processing only the revision presented in the
March 25, 1999, submittal, as discussed in Section
II.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
existing pollutant emission limitations
that apply during periods of startup,
shutdown and malfunction. EPA notes
that on June 12, 2015, the Agency
published a formal finding that a
number of states, including Tennessee,
have SIPs with SSM provisions that are
contrary to the CAA and existing EPA
guidance. See 80 FR 33840.
Accordingly, EPA issued a formal ‘‘SIP
call’’ requiring the affected states to
make a SIP submission to correct the
SSM regulations identified by EPA as
being deficient. Id. In that final action,
EPA determined that TAPCR Chapters
1200–3–20 and 1200–3–5 have
provisions that are contrary to the CAA,
specifically TAPCR 1200–3–20–.07(1),
1200–3–20–.07(3) and 1200–3–5–.02(1).
This direct final action only removes
language from 1200–3–20–.02(1)
indicating that an equipment failure that
does not qualify as a malfunction is an
automatic violation. Therefore, this final
action does not impact the provisions of
the Tennessee regulations implicated in
the SSM SIP call and has no effect on
EPA’s June 12, 2015, finding of
inadequacy regarding Tennessee’s SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of TAPCR 1200–3–20–
.02(1), entitled ‘‘Reasonable Measures
Required,’’ effective November 11, 1997,
which removed a statement that
preventable failures of process or
control equipment were presumptively
in violation of applicable emission
standards and the rule. Therefore, these
materials have been approved by EPA
for inclusion in the SIP, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will
be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the
next update to the SIP compilation.3
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov
and/or at the EPA Region 4 Office
(please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more
information).
V. Final Action
EPA is approving a change to the
Tennessee SIP at TAPCR 1200–3–20–
.02, submitted March 25, 1999, because
3 62
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
07APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
it is consistent with the CAA and
federal regulations. EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication,
EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision should adverse
comments be filed. This rule will be
effective June 6, 2017 without further
notice unless the Agency receives
adverse comments by May 8, 2017.
If EPA receives such comments, then
EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Parties
interested in commenting should do so
at this time. If no such comments are
received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on June 6, 2017
and no further action will be taken on
the proposed rule.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16929
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 6, 2017. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 15, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR—Tennessee
2. In § 52.2220, table 1 in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘1200–3–20–.02’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
*
*
16930
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED TENNESSEE REGULATIONS
State citation
*
*
*
CHAPTER 1200–3–20
*
*
1200–3–20–.02 ...............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Reasonable Measures Required ...
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–06877 Filed 4–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0429; FRL–9960–92–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; SC; Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve portions of the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission,
submitted by the State of South
Carolina, through the South Carolina
Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SC DHEC), on
December 18, 2015, to demonstrate that
the State meets the infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) for the 2012 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
The CAA requires that each state adopt
and submit a SIP for the
implementation, maintenance and
enforcement of each NAAQS
promulgated by EPA, which is
commonly referred to as an
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. SC DHEC certified
that the South Carolina SIP contains
provisions that ensure the 2012 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS is implemented,
enforced, and maintained in South
Carolina. EPA has determined that
portions of South Carolina’s SIP satisfy
certain required infrastructure elements
for the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
DATES: This rule is effective May 8,
2017.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Apr 06, 2017
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Explanation
*
LIMITS ON EMISSIONS DUE TO MALFUNCTIONS, START-UPS, AND SHUTDOWNS
*
*
State effective
date
Title/subject
Jkt 241001
*
*
*
4/7/2017, [insert Federal Register
citation].
*
*
11/11/1997
*
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2014–0429. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tiereny Bell, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Bell
can be reached via electronic mail at
bell.tiereny@epa.gov or via telephone at
(404) 562–9088.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Overview
On December 14, 2012 (78 FR 3086,
January 15, 2013), EPA promulgated a
revised primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
The standard was strengthened from
15.0 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/
m3) to 12.0 mg/m3. Pursuant to section
110(a)(1) of the CAA, States are required
to submit SIPs meeting the applicable
requirements of section 110(a)(2) within
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
three years after promulgation of a new
or revised NAAQS or within such
shorter period as EPA may prescribe.
Section 110(a)(2) requires states to
address basic SIP elements such as
requirements for monitoring, basic
program requirements and legal
authority that are designed to assure
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS. States were required to submit
such SIPs for the 2012 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS to EPA no later than December
14, 2015.
In a proposed rulemaking published
August 23, 2016 (81 FR 57509), EPA
proposed to approve portions of South
Carolina’s December 18, 2015, SIP
submission for the 2012 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS, with the exception of the
interstate transport requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs
1, 2, and 4), for which EPA did not
propose any action. On August 22, 2016
(81 FR 56512) EPA conditionally
approved South Carolina’s December
18, 2015, infrastructure SIP submission
regarding prong 4 of D(i) for the 2012
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Therefore, EPA
is not taking any action today pertaining
to prong 4. With respect to the interstate
transport requirements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2), EPA
will consider these requirements in
relation to South Carolina’s 2012
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS infrastructure
submission in a separate rulemaking.
The details of South Carolina
submission and the rationale for EPA’s
actions for this final rule are explained
in the August 23, 2016, proposed
rulemaking. Comments on the proposed
rulemaking were due on or before
September 22, 2016. EPA did not
receive any comments, adverse or
otherwise.
II. Final Action
With the exception of the interstate
transport requirements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs 1, 2,
and 4), EPA is taking final action to
approve South Carolina’s infrastructure
submission for the 2012 Annual PM2.5
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 66 (Friday, April 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16927-16930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06877]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0575; FRL-9960-57-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Tennessee: Reasonable Measures Required
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking
direct final action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee
Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), on March 25, 1999.
The SIP submittal includes a change to the TDEC regulation ``Reasonable
Measures Required.'' EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision
because it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and
federal regulations governing SIPs.
[[Page 16928]]
DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 6, 2017 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 8, 2017. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2016-0575 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089
and via electronic mail at akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 25, 1999, TDEC submitted a change to the Tennessee rules
to EPA for approval and incorporation into the Tennessee SIP.
Specifically, the submittal includes a change to remove a portion of
text from Tennessee Air Pollution Control Regulation (TAPCR) Rule 1200-
3-20-.02, ``Reasonable Measures Required,'' at paragraph (1). Existing
paragraph (1) covers measures that air contaminant sources must take
during periods of startup and shutdown and the treatment of equipment
failures that are not considered to be malfunctions. This provision was
originally submitted by TDEC as part of Chapter 1200-3-20, ``Limits on
Emissions Due to Malfunctions, Start-ups, and Shutdowns'' on February
13, 1979, and approved by EPA on February 6, 1980 (45 FR 8004).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The current SIP-approved version of paragraph (1) of Chapter
1200-3-20-.02 is the version that became state-effective on February
13, 1977. 40 CFR 52.2220(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Analysis of State's Submittal
The current SIP-approved version of TAPCR 1200-3-20-.02 provides,
in part, that for sources that are in or are significantly affecting a
nonattainment area, ``failures that are caused by poor maintenance,
careless operation or any other preventable upset condition or
preventable equipment breakdown shall not be considered malfunctions,
and shall be considered in violation of the emission standard exceeded
and this rule.'' The March 25, 1999, submittal modifies the treatment
of those equipment failures that are not considered malfunctions by
removing the statement that such failures ``shall be considered in
violation of the emission standard exceeded and this rule.'' \2\ This
rule change simply eliminates language indicating that a source which
experiences an equipment failure is automatically in violation of
applicable emission standards and the Tennessee rule. EPA believes this
change is appropriate because an instance of equipment failure does not
always result in an exceedance of an emission standard. In addition,
EPA notes that, in accordance with TAPCR 1200-3-13-.01, any preventable
failure to properly operate control equipment may still be in violation
of emission control requirements contained in specific emission
standards of the Tennessee SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The provision at TAPCR 1200-3-20-.02(1) in the March 25,
1999, submittal does not include the phrase ``[f]or sources
identified in Chapter 1200-3-19, or by a permit condition or an
order issued by the Board or by the Technical Secretary as being in
or significantly affecting a nonattainment area,'' which is
currently approved into the SIP. However, EPA is processing only the
revision presented in the March 25, 1999, submittal, as discussed in
Section II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SIP revision does not provide an exemption for any applicable
emission standards, nor does it modify any applicable requirements for
air contaminant sources. With this change, all applicable emission
standards will continue to apply during all times. EPA is approving
this revision because it is consistent with the CAA.
III. Start Up, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) SIP Call Considerations
In this action, EPA is not approving or disapproving revisions to
any existing pollutant emission limitations that apply during periods
of startup, shutdown and malfunction. EPA notes that on June 12, 2015,
the Agency published a formal finding that a number of states,
including Tennessee, have SIPs with SSM provisions that are contrary to
the CAA and existing EPA guidance. See 80 FR 33840. Accordingly, EPA
issued a formal ``SIP call'' requiring the affected states to make a
SIP submission to correct the SSM regulations identified by EPA as
being deficient. Id. In that final action, EPA determined that TAPCR
Chapters 1200-3-20 and 1200-3-5 have provisions that are contrary to
the CAA, specifically TAPCR 1200-3-20-.07(1), 1200-3-20-.07(3) and
1200-3-5-.02(1). This direct final action only removes language from
1200-3-20-.02(1) indicating that an equipment failure that does not
qualify as a malfunction is an automatic violation. Therefore, this
final action does not impact the provisions of the Tennessee
regulations implicated in the SSM SIP call and has no effect on EPA's
June 12, 2015, finding of inadequacy regarding Tennessee's SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of TAPCR 1200-3-
20-.02(1), entitled ``Reasonable Measures Required,'' effective
November 11, 1997, which removed a statement that preventable failures
of process or control equipment were presumptively in violation of
applicable emission standards and the rule. Therefore, these materials
have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective
date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be
incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\ EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 4 Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Final Action
EPA is approving a change to the Tennessee SIP at TAPCR 1200-3-
20-.02, submitted March 25, 1999, because
[[Page 16929]]
it is consistent with the CAA and federal regulations. EPA is
publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views
this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse
comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 6, 2017 without
further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by May 8,
2017.
If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on June 6, 2017 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 6, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 15, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR--Tennessee
0
2. In Sec. 52.2220, table 1 in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``1200-3-20-.02'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 16930]]
Table 1--EPA Approved Tennessee Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER 1200-3-20 LIMITS ON EMISSIONS DUE TO MALFUNCTIONS, START-UPS, AND SHUTDOWNS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
1200-3-20-.02................... Reasonable Measures 11/11/1997 4/7/2017, [insert .....................
Required. Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-06877 Filed 4-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P