Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2017 Season, 16298-16306 [2017-06592]

Download as PDF 16298 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 92 [Docket No. FWS–R7–MB–2016–0136; FF09M21200–156–FXMB1231099BPP0] RIN 1018–BB71 Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2017 Season Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) is establishing migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2017 season. These regulations allow for the continuation of customary and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska and prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of birds may occur. These regulations were developed under a comanagement process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and Alaska Native representatives. The rulemaking is necessary because the regulations governing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are subject to annual review. This rulemaking establishes region-specific regulations that go into effect on March 31, 2017, and expire on August 31, 2017. DATES: This is rule is effective March 31, 2017 through August 31, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Dewhurst, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907) 786– 3499. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES SUMMARY: Why is this rulemaking necessary? This rulemaking is necessary because, by law, the migratory bird harvest season is closed unless opened by the Secretary of the Interior, and the regulations governing subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are subject to public review and annual approval. This rule establishes regulations for the taking of migratory birds for subsistence uses in Alaska during the spring and summer of 2017. This rule also sets forth a list of migratory bird season openings and closures in Alaska by region. How do I find the history of these regulations? Background information, including past events leading to this rulemaking, VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 accomplishments since the Migratory Bird Treaties with Canada and Mexico were amended, and a history, were originally addressed in the Federal Register on August 16, 2002 (67 FR 53511) and most recently on April 1, 2016 (81 FR 18781). Recent Federal Register documents and all final rules setting forth the annual harvest regulations are available at https://www.fws.gov/alaska/ambcc/ regulations.htm or by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. What is the process for issuing regulations for the subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is establishing migratory bird subsistenceharvest regulations in Alaska for the 2017 season. These regulations allow for the continuation of customary and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska and prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of birds may occur. These regulations were developed under a comanagement process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and Alaska Native representatives. The Alaska Migratory Bird Comanagement Council (Co-management Council) held meetings on April 6–7, 2016, to develop recommendations for changes that would take effect during the 2017 harvest season. The Comanagement Council also amended the consent agenda package of carry-over regulations to request a limited emperor goose harvest for 2017; these recommended changes were presented first to the Pacific Flyway Council and then to the Service Regulations Committee (SRC) for approval at the SRC meeting on July 31, 2015. On February 10, 2017, we published in the Federal Register a proposed rule (82 FR 10316) to amend 50 CFR part 92 to establish regulations for the 2017 spring and summer subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska at subpart D, and to make certain changes to the permanent regulations at subpart C. We accepted public comments on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending March 13, 2017. A summary of the comments we received, and our responses to them, is provided below, under Summary of Comments and Responses. This Final Rule This rule contains no changes from the proposed regulation amendments published in the February 10, 2017, proposed rule (82 FR 10316). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Who is eligible to hunt under these regulations? Eligibility to harvest under the regulations established in 2003 was limited to permanent residents, regardless of race, in villages located within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the Aleutian Islands, and in areas north and west of the Alaska Range (50 CFR 92.5). These geographical restrictions opened the initial migratory bird subsistence harvest to about 13 percent of Alaska residents. Highpopulated, roaded areas such as Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the Gulf of Alaska roaded area, and Southeast Alaska were excluded from eligible subsistence harvest areas. In response to petitions requesting inclusion in the harvest in 2004, we added 13 additional communities consistent with the criteria set forth at 50 CFR 92.5(c). These communities were Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina, Copper Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina, Tatitlek, Chenega, Port Graham, Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a combined population of 2,766. In 2005, we added three additional communities for glaucouswinged gull egg gathering only in response to petitions requesting inclusion. These southeastern communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and Yakutat, with a combined population of 2,459, according to the latest census information at that time. In 2007, we enacted the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s request to expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area to include the Central Interior area. This action excluded the following communities from participation in this harvest: Big Delta/Fort Greely, Healy, McKinley Park/Village, and Ferry, with a combined population of 2,812. In 2012, we received a request from the Native Village of Eyak to include Cordova, Alaska, for a limited season that would legalize the traditional gathering of gull eggs and the hunting of waterfowl during spring. This request resulted in a new, limited harvest of spring waterfowl and gull eggs starting in 2014. What is different in the regulations for 2017? Subpart C Under subpart C, General Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest, we are amending § 92.22, the list of birds open to subsistence harvest, by adding emperor goose (Chen canagica) and by E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations amending cackling goose to allow egg gathering. The Co-management Council proposed a new emperor goose limited subsistence hunt for the 2016 season. Since 2012, the Co-management Council has received regulatory proposals from the Sun’aq Tribe of Kodiak, the KodiakAleutians Subsistence Regional Advisory Council, the Yaquillrit Keutisti Council (Bristol Bay), and the Bering Strait/Norton Sound Migratory Bird Council (Kawerak) to open the harvest of emperor geese for the subsistence season. Since the hunting season has been closed since 1987 for emperor geese, the Co-management Council created a subcommittee to address these proposals. The emperor goose harvest was guided by the 2006 Pacific Flyway Management Plan and the 2005–2006 Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose Management Plan. Between 80 and 90 percent of the emperor goose population breeds on the YukonKuskokwim Delta of Alaska, and most emperor geese winter in remote western Alaska, with the remainder wintering in Russia. Two studies were conducted concurrently by the Service and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The first study provided a comprehensive evaluation of all available emperor goose survey data and assessed harvest potential of the population. The second study developed a Bayesian state space population model to improve estimates of population size by integrating current population assessment methods using all available data sets. The model provides a framework from which to make inferences about survival rates, age structure, and population size. The results of these studies will assist in amending the management plans. The 2016 spring emperor goose survey was conducted April 21–24, 2016. The spring index was 79,348 birds, which represented a 19.2 percent decrease from the previous count in 2015. The current 3-year (2014–2016) average count of 85,795 is 4.8 percent above the previous 3-year (2012–2015 [no survey in 2013]) average of 81,875. Further, it is above the threshold for consideration of an open hunting season on emperor geese as specified in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose Management Plan and the Pacific Flyway Council Management Plan for emperor geese. As a result of this new information, the Co-management Council amended their motion of the consent agenda to add an allowance for a limited emperor goose harvest in 2016. The Pacific Flyway Council met in July 2015, and VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 supported the Co-management Council’s recommendation to work with the State of Alaska and the Service to develop harvest regulations and monitoring for a limited emperor goose harvest in 2016. On July 31, 2015, the SRC supported the Co-management Council’s proposed limited harvest of emperor geese for the 2016 Alaska spring and summer subsistence season. However, the approval was provisional based upon the following: (1) A limited harvest of 3,500 emperor geese to ensure that population growth continues toward the Flyway management plan objective; (2) A harvest allocation (e.g., an individual, family, or Village quota or permit hunt) that ensures harvest does not exceed 3,500; (3) Agreement on a monitoring program to index abundance of the emperor goose population; and (4) A revised Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan, including harvest allocation among all parties (including spring/summer and fall/ winter), population objective, population monitoring, and thresholds for season restriction or closure. The harvest allocation design and harvest monitoring plan were to be completed by November 1, 2016. Additionally, there was an explicit statement that the limited, legalized harvest of 3,500 birds was not in addition to existing subsistence harvest (approximately 3,200 emperor geese). The 3,500-bird allowable harvest was to be allocated to subsistence users during the spring and summer subsistence season. The SRC suggested that the allowable harvest should be monitored to ensure it does not exceed 3,500 birds. On August 13–14, and September 21, 2015, the Co-management Council Native Caucus met separately and with all partners to discuss options available to limit and monitor the harvest, as well as options to allocate the 3,500 birds across the six regions where emperor geese occur. Given the limited time provided to address the four conditions placed on this new harvest by the SRC, all partners agreed that the best course of action would be to spend additional time working together to develop a culturally sensitive framework tailored to each participating region that conserves the population and adequately addresses the data needs of all partners. In support of this recommendation, the Co-management Council took action to: Postpone an emperor goose harvest until 2017; work with all partners to develop the harvest framework; and work with their Emperor Goose Subcommittee and the Pacific Flyway Council on updating the PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 16299 Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan. In 2016, work continued on the Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council draft Management Plan for emperor geese. The Co-management Council’s Management Plan was the first of its kind developed cooperatively for managing the emperor goose population of Alaska and was signed by the Co-management Council on September 1, 2016. Adoption of the Comanagement Council’s Emperor Goose Management Plan was contingent on the adoption of the Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan by the Pacific Flyway Council. The Pacific Flyway Council adopted the 2016 Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan on September 30, 2016. The Comanagement Council’s Management Plan specifies regulations for the spring/ summer subsistence hunt period and will serve as a companion to the 2016 revision of the Pacific Flyway Management Plan for the Emperor Goose, which specifies regulations for the fall/winter harvest of emperor geese. The Co-management Council’s Management Plan supersedes the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose Management Plan for emperor goose management. In both management plans, the spring survey index was been replaced by a summer survey index of indicated total birds (total bird index) derived from aerial surveys of emperor goose abundance on the YukonKuskokwim Delta (YKD Coastal Zone Survey). The total bird index is less biased and more precise than the spring survey index and is based on statistical sampling theory. The 2016 survey index was 34,109 (SE = 2,490) emperor geese, which equates to a total rangewide population of about 177,000 geese. The most recent 3-year (2014–2016) average population index is 30,965 emperor geese, representing a total rangewide population of about 161,000 geese. The Co-management Council’s Plan for the emperor goose establishes a population objective consistent with the abundance achieved in 2016 (i.e., abundance index = 34,109) after about 30 years of hunting season closures. The total bird index and population objective are viewed as interim strategies that will be reevaluated after 3 years of the Co-management Council’s Management Plan implementation, while other population-assessment models are further evaluated and refined, and an agreement developed on the most appropriate short- and longterm survey protocols. The Co-management Council’s Management Plan outlines an emperor goose harvest strategy based on using a E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES 16300 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations total bird index from the YKD Coastal Zone Survey to assess population status relative to a regulatory harvest threshold. The total bird index is a relative measure of population size based on the number of geese detected from aerial surveys on the YukonKuskokwim Delta during the early nesting period. The Co-management Council’s Plan allows for an open subsistence harvest when the YKD Coastal Zone Survey index equals or exceeds 28,000 geese, which equates to a total rangewide population size of about 146,000 geese based on current model-based estimates. A more restrictive harvest quota will be considered if the population index declines below 28,000 geese to help reduce the probability for a subsequent closed season. The harvest season will be closed if the population index declines below 23,000 emperor geese, which equates to a total rangewide population size of about 120,000 geese. The decision to restrict the harvest quota when the population is between 23,000 and 28,000 geese depends on Comanagement Council recommendations to the Service after review of current year population status relative to the objective, trends, and other information. The Service maintains authority to establish a more conservative quota for allowable take if determined appropriate. The population thresholds for consideration of hunting season restrictions and closure represent about 80 percent and 70 percent of the population objective (i.e., abundance level achieved in 2016; 34,109 geese). Selection of these thresholds by the Service and the Co-management Council were informed by an analysis conducted by the Service. The Service’s analysis derived the hunting season restrictions and closure thresholds given conservation and harvest objectives, uncertainty in abundance and harvest estimation, and a predictive demographic model (E. Osnas and C. Frost, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, unpublished report). The term of this harvest strategy is 5 years. However, during the 3-year period (2017–2019) following implementation, the Subcommittee will annually review available data (e.g., harvest survey data, population status and trend, and other relevant information) and consider the need for conservation measures. After the 3-year period, the Subcommittee will conduct a thorough analysis of the available data to determine efficacy of the harvest strategy and will consider alternative strategies if warranted. Alternatives will be considered as amendments to the VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 management plan and be effective for the remainder of the 5-year term. The spring/summer subsistence harveststrategy is complementary to the fall/ winter harvest strategy included in the Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan. In recognition that emperor geese are a shared resource, the Co-Management Council has established the following spring/summer subsistence-harvest guidelines: (1) The harvest strategy seeks to maintain a population of emperor geese above an index of 23,000 birds based on the total bird index from the most recent YKD Coastal Zone Survey; (2) If the total bird index from the previous year is greater than 23,000 birds, then spring/summer subsistence harvest of emperor geese will be open to customary and traditional practices; (3) If the total bird index from the previous year drops below 28,000 birds, the Co-management Council will consider implementing conservation measures that include: Increased outreach and education programs, reduced season length (e.g., 2-week harvest season), extension of the 30-day closure, cessation of egg collection, limiting hunting to elder and ceremonial harvest only, or other measures as identified by the parties to the management plan; and (4) If the total bird index from the previous year is less than 23,000 birds, then emperor goose hunting will be closed. The Service finds that this approach will provide for the preservation and maintenance of emperor geese in Alaska. See 16 U.S.C. 712(1). The Association of Village Council Presidents’ Waterfowl Conservation Committee submitted a proposal to open egg gathering of the cackling goose subspecies of Canada goose (Branta canadensis) in the Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region of Alaska. Currently all of the cackling geese nest on the Yukon/ Kuskokwim Delta. The 2016 fall cackling Canada goose population index is 327,453 ± 21,104 (SE) birds and the 3-year (2014–2016) average is 320,658 birds. These estimates are 5.7 percent below and 0.9 percent above, respectively, those reported in 2015, and above the population objective threshold of 250,000 birds. The Comanagement Council voted in April 2016 to support the proposal with the modification that the dates for egg collecting would be lumped with the existing harvest season that is announced annually by the Service’s Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the Association of Village Council Presidents’ Waterfowl Conservation PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Committee. This season would include a 30-day closure to protect nesting birds. Likewise, we find that this approach will provide for the preservation and maintenance of the subspecies population of cackling geese. Subpart D The regulations in subpart D, Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest, include changes from our 2016 regulations for the Prince William Sound East and Northwest Arctic regions as discussed below. The Chugach Regional Resource Commission submitted a proposal to open the Cordova subsistence harvest, on the barriers islands of Prince William Sound, to include residents of Tatitlek and Chenega Bay. This would allow residents of these two small communities also to be able to take advantage of this limited harvest opportunity in their area. The number of participants from Cordova is much smaller than originally anticipated; thus, it is likely that added eligibility for these two small communities would not pose a significant increase in harvest. The Co-management Council supported this proposal with the provision that registration would be available in each community, and that outreach would be provided on the regulations. The Northwest Arctic Regional Council submitted a proposal to amend hunting season dates to reflect a trend for earlier spring migration and to be able to hunt molting geese that stage in their area. In subsequent meetings between the Service and the Regional Council, dates were adjusted and clarified to have waterfowl harvest, including hunting and egg gathering, from April 2 through June 14, which would resume July 16, after the required 30-day nesting closure. The harvest of nonbreeding, molting geese would run July 1 through July 15. The Comanagement Council unanimously supported the amended dates at their Statewide meeting in April 2016. How will the service ensure that the subsistence migratory bird harvest complies with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and will not threaten the conservation of endangered and threatened species? We have monitored subsistence harvest for the past 25 years through the use of household surveys in the most heavily used subsistence harvest areas, such as the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. In recent years, more intensive surveys combined with outreach efforts focused on species identification have been added to improve the accuracy of information gathered from regions still E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations reporting some subsistence harvest of listed or candidate species. Based on our monitoring of the migratory bird species and populations taken for subsistence, we find that this regulation will provide for the preservation and maintenance of migratory bird stocks as required by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703–712). The Act’s 16 U.S.C. 712(1) provision states that the Service, ‘‘is authorized to issue such regulations as may be necessary to assure that the taking of migratory birds and the collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional and other essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, during seasons established so as to provide for the preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.’’ Communication and coordination between the Service, the Co-management Council, and the Pacific Flyway Council have allowed us to set harvest regulations to ensure the longterm viability of the migratory bird stocks. In addition, Alaska migratory bird subsistence harvest rates have continued to decline since the inception of the subsistence-harvest program, reducing concerns about the program’s consistency with the preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds. As for the ensuring the conservation of Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed species, spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri) and the Alaska-breeding population of Steller’s eiders (Polysticta stelleri) are listed as threatened species. Their migration and breeding distribution overlap with areas where the spring and summer subsistence migratory bird hunt is open in Alaska. Both species are closed to hunting, although harvest surveys and Service documentation indicate both species are taken in several regions of Alaska. We have determined that this final rule complies with the ESA (see Endangered Species Act Consideration discussion, below). The Service has dual objectives and responsibilities for authorizing a subsistence harvest while protecting migratory birds and threatened species. Although these objectives continue to be challenging, they are not irreconcilable, provided that: (1) Regulations continue to protect threatened species, (2) measures to address documented threats are implemented, and (3) the subsistence community and other conservation partners commit to working together. With these dual objectives in mind, the Service, working with North Slope partners, developed VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 measures in 2009 to further reduce the potential for shooting mortality or injury of closed species. These conservation measures included: (1) Increased waterfowl hunter outreach and community awareness through partnering with the North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force; and (2) continued enforcement of the migratory bird regulations that are protective of listed eiders. This rule continues to focus on the North Slope from Barrow to Point Hope because Steller’s eiders from the listed Alaska breeding population are known to breed and migrate there, and harvest survey data and direct observations indicate take during subsistence harvest has occurred there. These regulations are designed to address several ongoing eider-management needs by clarifying for subsistence users that (1) Service law enforcement personnel have authority to verify species of birds possessed by hunters, and (2) it is illegal to possess any species of bird closed to harvest. This rule also describes how the Service’s existing authority of emergency closure would be implemented, if necessary, to protect Steller’s eiders. We are always willing to discuss regulations with our partners on the North Slope to ensure protection of closed species while providing subsistence hunters an opportunity to maintain the culture and traditional migratory bird harvest of the community. These regulations pertaining to bag checks and possession of illegal birds are deemed necessary to monitor take of closed eider species during the subsistence hunt. In collaboration with North Slope partners, a number of conservation efforts have been implemented to raise awareness and educate hunters on Steller’s eider conservation via the bird fair, meetings, radio shows, signs, school visits, and one-on-one contacts. Limited intermittent monitoring on the North Slope, focused primarily at Barrow, found no evidence that listed eiders were shot in 2009 through 2012; one Steller’s eider and one spectacled eider were found shot during the summer of 2013; one Steller’s eider was found shot in 2014; and no listed eiders were found shot in 2015 or 2016. Elsewhere in Alaska, one spectacled eider that appeared to have been shot was found dead on the YukonKuskokwim Delta in 2015. The Service acknowledges progress made with the other eider conservation measures, including partnering with the North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force, for increased waterfowl-hunter awareness, continued enforcement of the regulations, and in-season verification PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 16301 of the harvest. To reduce the threat of shooting mortality of threatened eiders, we continue to work with North Slope partners to conduct education and outreach. In addition, the emergencyclosure authority provides another level of assurance if an unexpected number of Steller’s eiders are killed by shooting (50 CFR 92.21 and 50 CFR 92.32). In-season harvest-monitoring information will be used to evaluate the efficacy of regulations, conservation measures, and outreach efforts. Conservation measures are being continued by the Service, with the amount of effort and emphasis being based on regulatory adherence. The longstanding general emergencyclosure provision at 50 CFR 92.21 specifies that the harvest may be closed or temporarily suspended upon finding that a continuation of the regulation allowing the harvest would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of any migratory bird population. With regard to Steller’s eiders, the regulations at 50 CFR 92.32, carried over from the past 6 years, clarify that we will take action under 50 CFR 92.21 as is necessary to prevent further take of Steller’s eiders, and that action could include temporary or long-term closures of the harvest in all or a portion of the geographic area open to harvest. When and if mortality of threatened eiders is documented, we will evaluate each mortality event by criteria such as cause, quantity, sex, age, location, and date. We will consult with the Comanagement Council when we are considering an emergency closure. If we determine that an emergency closure is necessary, we will design it to minimize its impact on the subsistence harvest. Endangered Species Act Consideration Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) requires the Secretary of the Interior to ‘‘review other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of the Act’’ and to ‘‘insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out * * * is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of [critical] habitat. * * *’’ We conducted an intraagency consultation with the Service’s Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office on this harvest as it will be managed in accordance with this final rule and the conservation measures. The consultation was completed with a biological opinion dated March 13, 2017, that concluded the final rule and conservation measures are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 16302 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations Steller’s and spectacled eiders or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES Summary of Comments and Responses On February 10, 2017, we published in the Federal Register a proposed rule (82 FR 10316) to amend 50 CFR part 92 to establish regulations in Alaska for the 2017 subsistence season. We accepted public comments on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending March 13, 2017. We posted an announcement of the comment-period dates for the proposed rule, as well as the rule itself and related historical documents, on the Comanagement Council’s Internet homepage. By facsimile (fax), we issued a press release, announcing our request for public comments and the pertinent deadlines for such comments, to the media Statewide in Alaska. Additionally, we made all relevant documents available on https:// www.regulations.gov. In response to the proposed rule, the Service received seven comments. The comments are addressed below by topic. Comments (1 and 2): We received one general comment on the overall regulations that expressed strong opposition to the concept of allowing any hunting of migratory birds in Alaska; another commenter read the above-mentioned comment online and rebutted it, defending waterfowl hunting and its sustainability. Service Response: For centuries, indigenous inhabitants of Alaska have harvested migratory birds for subsistence purposes during the spring and summer months. The Canada and Mexico migratory bird treaties were amended for the express purpose of allowing subsistence hunting for migratory birds during the spring and summer. The amendments indicate that the Service should issue regulations allowing such hunting as provided in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act; see 16 U.S.C. 712(1). See also Statutory Authority, below, for more details. Comment (3): We received two comments on the opening of the emperor goose harvest that expressed support for the renewed hunt, stating that a properly managed hunt may actually help the birds by putting more money into management of the species. Also, one commenter stated that they were pleased this co-management effort will give Alaskans the opportunity to hunt emperor geese again. Service Response: The Service appreciates the support on this conservation success story for emperor geese. Additional information is VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 provided in our response to Comments (4) and (5). Comment (4): We received two comments on opening the emperor goose harvest that expressed concern that the way the upcoming open subsistence hunt is structured poses a risk to the emperor goose population. Both commenters suggested lowering the number of emperor geese allowed to be taken. Service Response: The harvestable quotas were arrived at via a comanagement process that involved the Service, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and Alaska Native Peoples from all regions supporting emperor geese. The term of this harvest strategy is 5 years. However, during the 3-year period (2017–2019) following implementation, available harvestrelated data (e.g., harvest survey data, population status and trend, and other relevant information) will be examined and the need for conservation measures will be considered. Further, the harvest strategy adopted by the Pacific Flyway Council and the Alaska Migratory Bird Co-Management Council includes specific population indices associated with customary and traditional harvest, restricted harvest, and closure. Comment (5): We received one comment on the upcoming emperor goose harvest that suggested limiting the hunt to a narrower geographical region to protect the nesting grounds. Service Response: The majority of emperor geese nest on the YukonKuskokwim Delta. The Pacific Flyway Council and Alaska Migratory Bird CoManagement Plans incorporate the use of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Coastal Zone Breeding Pair Survey to monitor this population and the potential effects of harvest, thereby ensuring the increased likelihood of detecting any negative impacts to the breeding population. Finally, as agreed upon in the amendment of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (Japan Treaty), the YukonKuskokwim Delta region is required to identify and enforce a 30-day closure period during the nesting season. The structure of the emperor goose subsistence harvest in Alaska was developed in a co-management process that provides equal access to all qualified subsistence users. However, Alaska Native peoples living in this region have primarily relied on Pacific white-fronted geese and cackling Canada geese. While important from cultural and traditional aspects, emperor geese have not comprised a substantive proportion of migratory bird harvest in this region, and we do not expect high levels of subsistence hunting activities on nesting grounds PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 requiring that we adopt the commenter’s suggestion. Statutory Authority We derive our authority to issue these regulations from the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, at 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with the treaties with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to ‘‘issue such regulations as may be necessary to assure that the taking of migratory birds and the collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional and other essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, during seasons established so as to provide for the preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.’’ Effective Date of This Rule The amendments to subparts C and D of 50 CFR part 92 will take effect on March 31, 2017 (see DATES, above). If there was a delay in the effective date of these regulations after this final rulemaking, subsistence hunters would not be able to take full advantage of their subsistence hunting opportunities. We therefore find that ‘‘good cause’’ exists justifying the earlier start date, within the terms of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and under authority of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (July 3, 1918), as amended (16 U.S.C. 703–712). Required Determinations Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563) Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not significant. Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for improvements in the nation’s regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES Regulatory Flexibility Act The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). A regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required. This rule legalizes a pre-existing subsistence activity, and the resources harvested will be consumed. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. It legalizes and regulates a traditional subsistence activity. It will not result in a substantial increase in subsistence harvest or a significant change in harvesting patterns. The commodities that will be regulated under this rule are migratory birds. This rule deals with legalizing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds and, as such, does not involve commodities traded in the marketplace. A small economic benefit from this rule derives from the sale of equipment and ammunition to carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if not all, businesses that sell hunting equipment in rural Alaska qualify as small businesses. We have no reason to believe that this rule will lead to a disproportionate distribution of benefits. (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government agencies; or geographic regions. This rule does not deal with traded commodities and, therefore, will not have an impact on prices for consumers. (c) Will not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This rule deals with the harvesting of wildlife for personal consumption. It will not regulate the marketplace in any way to generate substantial effects on the economy or the ability of businesses to compete. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act We have determined and certified under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local, State, or tribal governments or private entities. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not required. Participation on regional management bodies and the Comanagement Council requires travel expenses for some Alaska Native organizations and local governments. In addition, they assume some expenses related to coordinating involvement of village councils in the regulatory process. Total coordination and travel expenses for all Alaska Native organizations are estimated to be less than $300,000 per year. In a notice of decision (65 FR 16405; March 28, 2000), we identified 7 to 12 partner organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits and local governments) to administer the regional programs. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game also incurs expenses for travel to Comanagement Council and regional management body meetings. In addition, the State of Alaska will be required to provide technical staff support to each of the regional management bodies and to the Comanagement Council. Expenses for the State’s involvement may exceed $100,000 per year, but should not exceed $150,000 per year. When funding permits, we make annual grant agreements available to the partner organizations and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to help offset their expenses. Takings (Executive Order 12630) Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule will not have significant takings implications. This rule is not specific to particular land ownership, but applies to the harvesting of migratory bird resources throughout Alaska. A takings implication assessment is not required. Federalism (Executive Order 13132) Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. We discuss effects of this rule on the State of Alaska in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act section, above. We worked with the State of Alaska to develop these regulations. Therefore, a federalism summary impact statement is not required. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 16303 Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988) The Department, in promulgating this rule, has determined that it will not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal Governments Consistent with Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249; November 6, 2000), ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’, and Department of Interior policy on Consultation with Indian Tribes (December 1, 2011), in February 2016, we sent letters via electronic mail to all 229 Alaska Federally recognized Indian tribes. Consistent with Congressional direction (Pub. L. 108–199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108–447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267), we also sent letters to approximately 200 Alaska Native corporations and other tribal entities in Alaska soliciting their input if they would like the Service to consult with them on the 2017 migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations. We received no requests for consultation. We implemented the amended treaty with Canada with a focus on local involvement. The treaty calls for the creation of management bodies to ensure an effective and meaningful role for Alaska’s indigenous inhabitants in the conservation of migratory birds. According to the Letter of Submittal, management bodies are to include Alaska Native, Federal, and State of Alaska representatives as equals. They develop recommendations for, among other things: Seasons and bag limits, methods and means of take, law enforcement policies, population and harvest monitoring, education programs, research and use of traditional knowledge, and habitat protection. The management bodies involve village councils to the maximum extent possible in all aspects of management. To ensure maximum input at the village level, we required each of the 11 participating regions to create regional management bodies consisting of at least one representative from the participating villages. The regional management bodies meet twice annually to review and/or submit proposals to the Statewide body. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) This rule does not contain any new collections of information that require E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 16304 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has reviewed and approved our collection of information associated with: • Voluntary annual household surveys that we use to determine levels of subsistence take (OMB Control Number 1018–0124, expires October 31, 2019). • Permits associated with subsistence hunting (OMB Control Number 1018– 0075, expires June 30, 2019). • Emperor Goose Spring Subsistence Harvest Survey (to include number of geese harvested, age, sex, and mass of birds harvested associated) (OMB Control Number 1090–0011, expires August 31, 2018). National Environmental Policy Act Consideration (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) The annual regulations and options are considered in a December 2016 environmental assessment, ‘‘Managing Migratory Bird Subsistence Hunting in Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the 2017 Spring/Summer Harvest.’’ Copies are available from the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or at https:// www.regulations.gov. Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211) Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. This is not a significant regulatory action under this Executive Order; it allows only for traditional subsistence harvest and improves conservation of migratory birds by allowing effective regulation of this harvest. Further, this rule is not expected to significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is not a significant energy action under Executive Order 13211, and a Statement of Energy Effects is not required. nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92 Hunting, Treaties, Wildlife. Regulation Promulgation For the reasons set out in the preamble, we amend title 50, chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 PART 92—MIGRATORY BIRD SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA 1. The authority citation for part 92 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712. Subpart C—General Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest 2. Amend § 92.22 by: a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(3) as paragraph (a)(4); ■ b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3); and ■ c. Revising paragraph (a)(6). The addition and revision read as follows: ■ ■ § 92.22 Subsistence migratory bird species. * * * * * (a) * * * (3) Emperor goose (Chen canagica). * * * * * (6) Canada goose, subspecies cackling goose. * * * * * Subpart D—Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest 3. Amend subpart D by adding § 92.31 to read as follows: ■ § 92.31 Region-specific regulations. The 2017 season dates for the eligible subsistence-harvest areas are as follows: (a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region. (1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands): (i) Season: April 2–June 30. (ii) Closure: July 1–August 31. (2) Central Unit (Aleutian Region’s eastern boundary on the Alaska Peninsula westward to and including Unalaska Island): (i) Season: April 2–June 15 and July 16–August 31. (ii) Closure: June 16–July 15. (iii) Special Black Brant Season Closure: August 16–August 31, only in Izembek and Moffet lagoons. (iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All hunting and egg gathering closed in Game Management Units 9(D) and 10. (3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west to and including Attu Island): (i) Season: April 2–July 15 and August 16–August 31. (ii) Closure: July 16–August 15. (b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region. (1) Season: April 2–August 31. (2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be announced by the Service’s Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the Association of Village Council President’s Waterfowl Conservation Committee. This 30-day period will occur between June 1 and August 15 of PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 each year. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations. (3) Special Black Brant and Cackling Canada Goose Season Hunting Closure: From the period when egg laying begins until young birds are fledged. Closure dates to be announced by the Service’s Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the Association of Village Council President’s Waterfowl Conservation Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations. (c) Bristol Bay Region. (1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July 16–August 31 (general season); April 2– July 15 for seabird egg gathering only. (2) Closure: June 15–July 15 (general season); July 16–August 31 (seabird egg gathering). (d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound Region. (1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point Romanof to Canal Point): (i) Season: April 15–June 14 and July 16–August 31. (ii) Closure: June 15–July 15. (2) Remainder of the region: (i) Season: April 2–June 14 and July 16–August 31 for waterfowl; April 2– July 19 and August 21–August 31 for all other birds. (ii) Closure: June 15–July 15 for waterfowl; July 20–August 20 for all other birds. (e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except for the Kodiak Island roaded area, which is closed to the harvesting of migratory birds and their eggs. The closed area consists of all lands and waters (including exposed tidelands) east of a line extending from Crag Point in the north to the west end of Saltery Cove in the south and all lands and water south of a line extending from Termination Point along the north side of Cascade Lake extending to Anton Larsen Bay. Marine waters adjacent to the closed area are closed to harvest within 500 feet from the water’s edge. The offshore islands are open to harvest. (1) Season: April 2–June 30 and July 31–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June 20 and July 22–August 31 for all other birds. (2) Closure: July 1–July 30 for seabirds; June 21–July 21 for all other birds. (f) Northwest Arctic Region. (1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July 16–August 31 (hunting in general); waterfowl egg gathering April 2–June 14 only; seabird egg gathering May 20–July 12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting waterfowl July 1–July 15 only. E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations (2) Closure: June 15–July 15, except for the taking of seabird eggs and molting/non-nesting waterfowl as provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this section. (g) North Slope Region. (1) Southern Unit (Southwestern North Slope regional boundary east to Peard Bay, everything west of the longitude line 158°30′ W. and south of the latitude line 70°45′ N. to the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything south of the latitude line 69°45′ N. between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of Sagavinirktok River): (i) Season: April 2–June 29 and July 30–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June 19 and July 20–August 31 for all other birds. (ii) Closure: June 30–July 29 for seabirds; June 20–July 19 for all other birds. (iii) Special Black Brant Hunting Opening: From June 20–July 5. The open area consists of the coastline, from mean high water line outward to include open water, from Nokotlek Point east to longitude line 158°30′ W. This includes Peard Bay, Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright Inlet, but not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages. (2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay, everything east of the longitude line 158°30′ W. and north of the latitude line 70°45′ N. to west bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything north of the latitude line 69°45′ N. between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of Sagavinirktok River): (i) Season: April 2–June 6 and July 7– August 31 for king and common eiders; April 2–June 15 and July 16–August 31 for all other birds. (ii) Closure: June 7–July 6 for king and common eiders; June 16–July 15 for all other birds. (3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank of the Sagavanirktok River): (i) Season: April 2–June 19 and July 20–August 31. (ii) Closure: June 20–July 19. (4) All Units: yellow-billed loons. Annually, up to 20 yellow-billed loons total for the region inadvertently entangled in subsistence fishing nets in the North Slope Region may be kept for subsistence use. (5) North Coastal Zone (Cape Thompson north to Point Hope and east along the Arctic Ocean coastline around Point Barrow to Ross Point, including Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland). (i) No person may at any time, by any means, or in any manner, possess or have in custody any migratory bird or part thereof, taken in violation of subparts C and D of this part. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:40 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 (ii) Upon request from a Service law enforcement officer, hunters taking, attempting to take, or transporting migratory birds taken during the subsistence harvest season must present them to the officer for species identification. (h) Interior Region. (1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July 16–August 31; egg gathering May 1–June 14 only. (2) Closure: June 15–July 15. (i) Upper Copper River Region (Harvest Area: Game Management Units 11 and 13) (Eligible communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake, Chistochina and Cantwell). (1) Season: April 15–May 26 and June 27–August 31. (2) Closure: May 27–June 26. (3) The Copper River Basin communities listed above also documented traditional use harvesting birds in Game Management Unit 12, making them eligible to hunt in this unit using the seasons specified in paragraph (h) of this section. (j) Gulf of Alaska Region. (1) Prince William Sound Area West (Harvest area: Game Management Unit 6[D]), (Eligible Chugach communities: Chenega Bay, Tatitlek): (i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July 1–August 31. (ii) Closure: June 1–30. (2) Prince William Sound Area East (Harvest area: Game Management Units 6[B]and [C]—Barrier Islands between Strawberry Channel and Softtuk Bar), (Eligible Chugach communities: Cordova, Tatitlek, and Chenega Bay): (i) Season: April 2–April 30 (hunting); May 1–May 31 (gull egg gathering). (ii) Closure: May 1–August 31 (hunting); April 2–30 and June 1– August 31 (gull egg gathering). (iii) Species Open for Hunting: greater white-fronted goose; snow goose; gadwall; Eurasian and American wigeon; blue-winged and green-winged teal; mallard; northern shoveler; northern pintail; canvasback; redhead; ring-necked duck; greater and lesser scaup; king and common eider; harlequin duck; surf, white-winged, and black scoter; long-tailed duck; bufflehead; common and Barrow’s goldeneye; hooded, common, and redbreasted merganser; and sandhill crane. Species open for egg gathering: Glaucous-winged, herring, and mew gulls. (iv) Use of Boats/All-Terrain Vehicles: No hunting from motorized vehicles or any form of watercraft. (v) Special Registration: All hunters or egg gatherers must possess an annual permit, which is available from the PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 16305 Cordova offices of the Native Village of Eyak and the U. S. Forest Service. (3) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area: Game Management Unit 15[C] South of a line connecting the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of Fox River) (Eligible Chugach Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek): (i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July 1–August 31. (ii) Closure: June 1–30. (k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions of Game Management Unit 16[B] as specified below) (Eligible communities: Tyonek only): (1) Season: April 2–May 31—That portion of Game Management Unit 16(B) south of the Skwentna River and west of the Yentna River, and August 1–31— That portion of Game Management Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River, Beluga Lake, and the Triumvirate Glacier. (2) Closure: June 1–July 31. (l) Southeast Alaska. (1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest area: National Forest lands in Icy Strait and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass Rock near the Inian Islands, Table Rock in Cross Sound, and other traditional locations on the coast of Yakobi Island. The land and waters of Glacier Bay National Park remain closed to all subsistence harvesting (50 CFR part 100.3(a)): (i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15–June 30. (ii) Closure: July 1–August 31. (2) Communities of Craig and Hydaburg (Harvest area: Small islands and adjacent shoreline of western Prince of Wales Island from Point Baker to Cape Chacon, but also including Coronation and Warren islands): (i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15–June 30. (ii) Closure: July 1–August 31. (3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest area: Icy Bay (Icy Cape to Point Riou), and coastal lands and islands bordering the Gulf of Alaska from Point Manby southeast to and including Dry Bay): (i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering: May 15–June 30. (ii) Closure: July 1–August 31. ■ 4. Amend subpart D by adding § 92.32 to read as follows: § 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect Steller’s eiders. Upon finding that continuation of these subsistence regulations would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of threatened Steller’s eiders (Polysticta stelleri), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Regional Director, in consultation with the Comanagement Council, will immediately under § 92.21 take action as is necessary to prevent further take. Regulation E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1 16306 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Rules and Regulations changes implemented could range from a temporary closure of duck hunting in a small geographic area to large-scale regional or Statewide long-term closures of all subsistence migratory bird hunting. These closures or temporary suspensions will remain in effect until the Regional Director, in consultation with the Co-management Council, determines that the potential for additional Steller’s eiders to be taken no longer exists. Dated: March 28, 2017. Maureen D. Foster, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks. [FR Doc. 2017–06592 Filed 3–31–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333–15–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679 [Docket No. 160920866–7167–02] RIN 0648–XF332 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Reallocation of Pacific Cod in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Temporary rule; reallocation. AGENCY: NMFS is reallocating the projected unused amount of Pacific cod from catcher vessels using trawl gear to vessels using pot gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is necessary to allow the A season apportionment of the 2017 total allowable catch of Pacific cod to be harvested. DATES: Effective March 31, 2017 through 1200 hours, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), June 10, 2017. nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Apr 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Obren Davis, 907–586–7228. NMFS manages the groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive economic zone according to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Regulations governing fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679. The A season allowance of the 2017 Pacific cod total allowable catch (TAC) apportioned to catcher vessels using trawl gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the GOA is 6,933 metric tons (mt), as established by the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications for groundfish of the GOA (82 FR 12032, February 27, 2017). The Administrator, Alaska Region, NMFS, (Regional Administrator) has determined that catcher vessels using trawl gear will not be able to harvest 1,500 mt of the A season apportionment of the 2017 Pacific cod TAC allocated to those vessels under § 679.20(a)(12)(i)(B)(4). In accordance with § 679.20(a)(12)(ii)(B) the Regional Administrator has also determined that vessels using pot gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the GOA currently have the capacity to harvest this excess allocation and reallocates 1,500 mt to vessels using pot gear. Therefore, NMFS apportions 1,500 mt of Pacific cod from the A season apportionments for catcher vessels using trawl gear to vessels using pot gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the GOA. The harvest specifications for Pacific cod included in the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications for groundfish of the GOA (82 FR 12032, February 26, 2017) are revised as follows: 5,433 mt to the A season apportionment and 12,141 mt to the annual amount for catcher vessels using trawl gear and 7,349 mt to the A season apportionment and 10,621 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 mt to the annual amount to vessels using pot gear. Classification This action responds to the best available information recently obtained from the fishery. The Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA (AA), finds good cause to waive the requirement to provide prior notice and opportunity for public comment pursuant to the authority set forth at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is impracticable and contrary to the public interest. This requirement is impracticable and contrary to the public interest as it would prevent NMFS from responding to the most recent fisheries data in a timely fashion and would delay the reallocation of Pacific cod specified from catcher vessels using trawl gear to vessels using pot gear. Since the fishery is currently open, it is important to immediately inform the industry as to the revised allocations. Immediate notification is necessary to allow for the orderly conduct and efficient operation of this fishery, to allow the industry to plan for the fishing season, and to avoid potential disruption to the fishing fleet as well as processors. NMFS was unable to publish a notice providing time for public comment because the most recent, relevant data only became available as of March 29, 2017. The AA also finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in the effective date of this action under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). This finding is based upon the reasons provided above for waiver of prior notice and opportunity for public comment. This action is required by § 679.20 and is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: March 30, 2017. Karen H. Abrams, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2017–06644 Filed 3–30–17; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM 04APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 4, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16298-16306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06592]



[[Page 16298]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 92

[Docket No. FWS-R7-MB-2016-0136; FF09M21200-156-FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018-BB71


Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations 
for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2017 Season

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) is 
establishing migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska 
for the 2017 season. These regulations allow for the continuation of 
customary and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska 
and prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of 
birds may occur. These regulations were developed under a co-management 
process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 
and Alaska Native representatives. The rulemaking is necessary because 
the regulations governing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds in 
Alaska are subject to annual review. This rulemaking establishes 
region-specific regulations that go into effect on March 31, 2017, and 
expire on August 31, 2017.

DATES: This is rule is effective March 31, 2017 through August 31, 
2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Dewhurst, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907) 
786-3499.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Why is this rulemaking necessary?

    This rulemaking is necessary because, by law, the migratory bird 
harvest season is closed unless opened by the Secretary of the 
Interior, and the regulations governing subsistence harvest of 
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to public review and annual 
approval. This rule establishes regulations for the taking of migratory 
birds for subsistence uses in Alaska during the spring and summer of 
2017. This rule also sets forth a list of migratory bird season 
openings and closures in Alaska by region.

How do I find the history of these regulations?

    Background information, including past events leading to this 
rulemaking, accomplishments since the Migratory Bird Treaties with 
Canada and Mexico were amended, and a history, were originally 
addressed in the Federal Register on August 16, 2002 (67 FR 53511) and 
most recently on April 1, 2016 (81 FR 18781).
    Recent Federal Register documents and all final rules setting forth 
the annual harvest regulations are available at https://www.fws.gov/alaska/ambcc/regulations.htm or by contacting the person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

What is the process for issuing regulations for the subsistence harvest 
of migratory birds in Alaska?

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is establishing migratory bird 
subsistence-harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2017 season. These 
regulations allow for the continuation of customary and traditional 
subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska and prescribe regional 
information on when and where the harvesting of birds may occur. These 
regulations were developed under a co-management process involving the 
Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and Alaska Native 
representatives.
    The Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council (Co-management 
Council) held meetings on April 6-7, 2016, to develop recommendations 
for changes that would take effect during the 2017 harvest season. The 
Co-management Council also amended the consent agenda package of carry-
over regulations to request a limited emperor goose harvest for 2017; 
these recommended changes were presented first to the Pacific Flyway 
Council and then to the Service Regulations Committee (SRC) for 
approval at the SRC meeting on July 31, 2015.
    On February 10, 2017, we published in the Federal Register a 
proposed rule (82 FR 10316) to amend 50 CFR part 92 to establish 
regulations for the 2017 spring and summer subsistence harvest of 
migratory birds in Alaska at subpart D, and to make certain changes to 
the permanent regulations at subpart C. We accepted public comments on 
the proposed rule for 30 days, ending March 13, 2017. A summary of the 
comments we received, and our responses to them, is provided below, 
under Summary of Comments and Responses.

This Final Rule

    This rule contains no changes from the proposed regulation 
amendments published in the February 10, 2017, proposed rule (82 FR 
10316).

Who is eligible to hunt under these regulations?

    Eligibility to harvest under the regulations established in 2003 
was limited to permanent residents, regardless of race, in villages 
located within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the Aleutian 
Islands, and in areas north and west of the Alaska Range (50 CFR 92.5). 
These geographical restrictions opened the initial migratory bird 
subsistence harvest to about 13 percent of Alaska residents. High-
populated, roaded areas such as Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and 
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the 
Gulf of Alaska roaded area, and Southeast Alaska were excluded from 
eligible subsistence harvest areas.
    In response to petitions requesting inclusion in the harvest in 
2004, we added 13 additional communities consistent with the criteria 
set forth at 50 CFR 92.5(c). These communities were Gulkana, Gakona, 
Tazlina, Copper Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina, Tatitlek, 
Chenega, Port Graham, Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a combined 
population of 2,766. In 2005, we added three additional communities for 
glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only in response to petitions 
requesting inclusion. These southeastern communities were Craig, 
Hydaburg, and Yakutat, with a combined population of 2,459, according 
to the latest census information at that time.
    In 2007, we enacted the Alaska Department of Fish and Game's 
request to expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area to 
include the Central Interior area. This action excluded the following 
communities from participation in this harvest: Big Delta/Fort Greely, 
Healy, McKinley Park/Village, and Ferry, with a combined population of 
2,812.
    In 2012, we received a request from the Native Village of Eyak to 
include Cordova, Alaska, for a limited season that would legalize the 
traditional gathering of gull eggs and the hunting of waterfowl during 
spring. This request resulted in a new, limited harvest of spring 
waterfowl and gull eggs starting in 2014.

What is different in the regulations for 2017?

Subpart C

    Under subpart C, General Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest, 
we are amending Sec.  92.22, the list of birds open to subsistence 
harvest, by adding emperor goose (Chen canagica) and by

[[Page 16299]]

amending cackling goose to allow egg gathering.
    The Co-management Council proposed a new emperor goose limited 
subsistence hunt for the 2016 season. Since 2012, the Co-management 
Council has received regulatory proposals from the Sun'aq Tribe of 
Kodiak, the Kodiak-Aleutians Subsistence Regional Advisory Council, the 
Yaquillrit Keutisti Council (Bristol Bay), and the Bering Strait/Norton 
Sound Migratory Bird Council (Kawerak) to open the harvest of emperor 
geese for the subsistence season. Since the hunting season has been 
closed since 1987 for emperor geese, the Co-management Council created 
a subcommittee to address these proposals. The emperor goose harvest 
was guided by the 2006 Pacific Flyway Management Plan and the 2005-2006 
Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose Management Plan. Between 80 and 90 percent 
of the emperor goose population breeds on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of 
Alaska, and most emperor geese winter in remote western Alaska, with 
the remainder wintering in Russia.
    Two studies were conducted concurrently by the Service and the 
Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The first study provided a 
comprehensive evaluation of all available emperor goose survey data and 
assessed harvest potential of the population. The second study 
developed a Bayesian state space population model to improve estimates 
of population size by integrating current population assessment methods 
using all available data sets. The model provides a framework from 
which to make inferences about survival rates, age structure, and 
population size. The results of these studies will assist in amending 
the management plans.
    The 2016 spring emperor goose survey was conducted April 21-24, 
2016. The spring index was 79,348 birds, which represented a 19.2 
percent decrease from the previous count in 2015. The current 3-year 
(2014-2016) average count of 85,795 is 4.8 percent above the previous 
3-year (2012-2015 [no survey in 2013]) average of 81,875. Further, it 
is above the threshold for consideration of an open hunting season on 
emperor geese as specified in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose 
Management Plan and the Pacific Flyway Council Management Plan for 
emperor geese.
    As a result of this new information, the Co-management Council 
amended their motion of the consent agenda to add an allowance for a 
limited emperor goose harvest in 2016. The Pacific Flyway Council met 
in July 2015, and supported the Co-management Council's recommendation 
to work with the State of Alaska and the Service to develop harvest 
regulations and monitoring for a limited emperor goose harvest in 2016. 
On July 31, 2015, the SRC supported the Co-management Council's 
proposed limited harvest of emperor geese for the 2016 Alaska spring 
and summer subsistence season. However, the approval was provisional 
based upon the following:
    (1) A limited harvest of 3,500 emperor geese to ensure that 
population growth continues toward the Flyway management plan 
objective;
    (2) A harvest allocation (e.g., an individual, family, or Village 
quota or permit hunt) that ensures harvest does not exceed 3,500;
    (3) Agreement on a monitoring program to index abundance of the 
emperor goose population; and
    (4) A revised Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan, 
including harvest allocation among all parties (including spring/summer 
and fall/winter), population objective, population monitoring, and 
thresholds for season restriction or closure.
    The harvest allocation design and harvest monitoring plan were to 
be completed by November 1, 2016. Additionally, there was an explicit 
statement that the limited, legalized harvest of 3,500 birds was not in 
addition to existing subsistence harvest (approximately 3,200 emperor 
geese). The 3,500-bird allowable harvest was to be allocated to 
subsistence users during the spring and summer subsistence season. The 
SRC suggested that the allowable harvest should be monitored to ensure 
it does not exceed 3,500 birds.
    On August 13-14, and September 21, 2015, the Co-management Council 
Native Caucus met separately and with all partners to discuss options 
available to limit and monitor the harvest, as well as options to 
allocate the 3,500 birds across the six regions where emperor geese 
occur. Given the limited time provided to address the four conditions 
placed on this new harvest by the SRC, all partners agreed that the 
best course of action would be to spend additional time working 
together to develop a culturally sensitive framework tailored to each 
participating region that conserves the population and adequately 
addresses the data needs of all partners. In support of this 
recommendation, the Co-management Council took action to: Postpone an 
emperor goose harvest until 2017; work with all partners to develop the 
harvest framework; and work with their Emperor Goose Subcommittee and 
the Pacific Flyway Council on updating the Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose 
Management Plan.
    In 2016, work continued on the Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management 
Council draft Management Plan for emperor geese. The Co-management 
Council's Management Plan was the first of its kind developed 
cooperatively for managing the emperor goose population of Alaska and 
was signed by the Co-management Council on September 1, 2016. Adoption 
of the Co-management Council's Emperor Goose Management Plan was 
contingent on the adoption of the Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose 
Management Plan by the Pacific Flyway Council. The Pacific Flyway 
Council adopted the 2016 Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan 
on September 30, 2016. The Co-management Council's Management Plan 
specifies regulations for the spring/summer subsistence hunt period and 
will serve as a companion to the 2016 revision of the Pacific Flyway 
Management Plan for the Emperor Goose, which specifies regulations for 
the fall/winter harvest of emperor geese. The Co-management Council's 
Management Plan supersedes the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose Management 
Plan for emperor goose management. In both management plans, the spring 
survey index was been replaced by a summer survey index of indicated 
total birds (total bird index) derived from aerial surveys of emperor 
goose abundance on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD Coastal Zone Survey). 
The total bird index is less biased and more precise than the spring 
survey index and is based on statistical sampling theory. The 2016 
survey index was 34,109 (SE = 2,490) emperor geese, which equates to a 
total rangewide population of about 177,000 geese. The most recent 3-
year (2014-2016) average population index is 30,965 emperor geese, 
representing a total rangewide population of about 161,000 geese. The 
Co-management Council's Plan for the emperor goose establishes a 
population objective consistent with the abundance achieved in 2016 
(i.e., abundance index = 34,109) after about 30 years of hunting season 
closures.
    The total bird index and population objective are viewed as interim 
strategies that will be reevaluated after 3 years of the Co-management 
Council's Management Plan implementation, while other population-
assessment models are further evaluated and refined, and an agreement 
developed on the most appropriate short- and long-term survey 
protocols.
    The Co-management Council's Management Plan outlines an emperor 
goose harvest strategy based on using a

[[Page 16300]]

total bird index from the YKD Coastal Zone Survey to assess population 
status relative to a regulatory harvest threshold. The total bird index 
is a relative measure of population size based on the number of geese 
detected from aerial surveys on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta during the 
early nesting period. The Co-management Council's Plan allows for an 
open subsistence harvest when the YKD Coastal Zone Survey index equals 
or exceeds 28,000 geese, which equates to a total rangewide population 
size of about 146,000 geese based on current model-based estimates. A 
more restrictive harvest quota will be considered if the population 
index declines below 28,000 geese to help reduce the probability for a 
subsequent closed season. The harvest season will be closed if the 
population index declines below 23,000 emperor geese, which equates to 
a total rangewide population size of about 120,000 geese. The decision 
to restrict the harvest quota when the population is between 23,000 and 
28,000 geese depends on Co-management Council recommendations to the 
Service after review of current year population status relative to the 
objective, trends, and other information. The Service maintains 
authority to establish a more conservative quota for allowable take if 
determined appropriate.
    The population thresholds for consideration of hunting season 
restrictions and closure represent about 80 percent and 70 percent of 
the population objective (i.e., abundance level achieved in 2016; 
34,109 geese). Selection of these thresholds by the Service and the Co-
management Council were informed by an analysis conducted by the 
Service. The Service's analysis derived the hunting season restrictions 
and closure thresholds given conservation and harvest objectives, 
uncertainty in abundance and harvest estimation, and a predictive 
demographic model (E. Osnas and C. Frost, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, unpublished report).
    The term of this harvest strategy is 5 years. However, during the 
3-year period (2017-2019) following implementation, the Subcommittee 
will annually review available data (e.g., harvest survey data, 
population status and trend, and other relevant information) and 
consider the need for conservation measures. After the 3-year period, 
the Subcommittee will conduct a thorough analysis of the available data 
to determine efficacy of the harvest strategy and will consider 
alternative strategies if warranted. Alternatives will be considered as 
amendments to the management plan and be effective for the remainder of 
the 5-year term. The spring/summer subsistence harvest-strategy is 
complementary to the fall/winter harvest strategy included in the 
Pacific Flyway Emperor Goose Management Plan. In recognition that 
emperor geese are a shared resource, the Co-Management Council has 
established the following spring/summer subsistence-harvest guidelines:
    (1) The harvest strategy seeks to maintain a population of emperor 
geese above an index of 23,000 birds based on the total bird index from 
the most recent YKD Coastal Zone Survey;
    (2) If the total bird index from the previous year is greater than 
23,000 birds, then spring/summer subsistence harvest of emperor geese 
will be open to customary and traditional practices;
    (3) If the total bird index from the previous year drops below 
28,000 birds, the Co-management Council will consider implementing 
conservation measures that include: Increased outreach and education 
programs, reduced season length (e.g., 2-week harvest season), 
extension of the 30-day closure, cessation of egg collection, limiting 
hunting to elder and ceremonial harvest only, or other measures as 
identified by the parties to the management plan; and
    (4) If the total bird index from the previous year is less than 
23,000 birds, then emperor goose hunting will be closed.
    The Service finds that this approach will provide for the 
preservation and maintenance of emperor geese in Alaska. See 16 U.S.C. 
712(1).
    The Association of Village Council Presidents' Waterfowl 
Conservation Committee submitted a proposal to open egg gathering of 
the cackling goose subspecies of Canada goose (Branta canadensis) in 
the Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region of Alaska. Currently all of the 
cackling geese nest on the Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta. The 2016 fall 
cackling Canada goose population index is 327,453  21,104 
(SE) birds and the 3-year (2014-2016) average is 320,658 birds. These 
estimates are 5.7 percent below and 0.9 percent above, respectively, 
those reported in 2015, and above the population objective threshold of 
250,000 birds. The Co-management Council voted in April 2016 to support 
the proposal with the modification that the dates for egg collecting 
would be lumped with the existing harvest season that is announced 
annually by the Service's Regional Director or his designee, after 
consultation with field biologists and the Association of Village 
Council Presidents' Waterfowl Conservation Committee. This season would 
include a 30-day closure to protect nesting birds. Likewise, we find 
that this approach will provide for the preservation and maintenance of 
the subspecies population of cackling geese.

Subpart D

    The regulations in subpart D, Annual Regulations Governing 
Subsistence Harvest, include changes from our 2016 regulations for the 
Prince William Sound East and Northwest Arctic regions as discussed 
below.
    The Chugach Regional Resource Commission submitted a proposal to 
open the Cordova subsistence harvest, on the barriers islands of Prince 
William Sound, to include residents of Tatitlek and Chenega Bay. This 
would allow residents of these two small communities also to be able to 
take advantage of this limited harvest opportunity in their area. The 
number of participants from Cordova is much smaller than originally 
anticipated; thus, it is likely that added eligibility for these two 
small communities would not pose a significant increase in harvest. The 
Co-management Council supported this proposal with the provision that 
registration would be available in each community, and that outreach 
would be provided on the regulations.
    The Northwest Arctic Regional Council submitted a proposal to amend 
hunting season dates to reflect a trend for earlier spring migration 
and to be able to hunt molting geese that stage in their area. In 
subsequent meetings between the Service and the Regional Council, dates 
were adjusted and clarified to have waterfowl harvest, including 
hunting and egg gathering, from April 2 through June 14, which would 
resume July 16, after the required 30-day nesting closure. The harvest 
of nonbreeding, molting geese would run July 1 through July 15. The Co-
management Council unanimously supported the amended dates at their 
Statewide meeting in April 2016.

How will the service ensure that the subsistence migratory bird harvest 
complies with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and will not threaten the 
conservation of endangered and threatened species?

    We have monitored subsistence harvest for the past 25 years through 
the use of household surveys in the most heavily used subsistence 
harvest areas, such as the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. In recent years, more 
intensive surveys combined with outreach efforts focused on species 
identification have been added to improve the accuracy of information 
gathered from regions still

[[Page 16301]]

reporting some subsistence harvest of listed or candidate species.
    Based on our monitoring of the migratory bird species and 
populations taken for subsistence, we find that this regulation will 
provide for the preservation and maintenance of migratory bird stocks 
as required by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712). The 
Act's 16 U.S.C. 712(1) provision states that the Service, ``is 
authorized to issue such regulations as may be necessary to assure that 
the taking of migratory birds and the collection of their eggs, by the 
indigenous inhabitants of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted for 
their own nutritional and other essential needs, as determined by the 
Secretary of the Interior, during seasons established so as to provide 
for the preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.'' 
Communication and coordination between the Service, the Co-management 
Council, and the Pacific Flyway Council have allowed us to set harvest 
regulations to ensure the long-term viability of the migratory bird 
stocks. In addition, Alaska migratory bird subsistence harvest rates 
have continued to decline since the inception of the subsistence-
harvest program, reducing concerns about the program's consistency with 
the preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.
    As for the ensuring the conservation of Endangered Species Act 
(ESA)-listed species, spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri) and the 
Alaska-breeding population of Steller's eiders (Polysticta stelleri) 
are listed as threatened species. Their migration and breeding 
distribution overlap with areas where the spring and summer subsistence 
migratory bird hunt is open in Alaska. Both species are closed to 
hunting, although harvest surveys and Service documentation indicate 
both species are taken in several regions of Alaska. We have determined 
that this final rule complies with the ESA (see Endangered Species Act 
Consideration discussion, below).
    The Service has dual objectives and responsibilities for 
authorizing a subsistence harvest while protecting migratory birds and 
threatened species. Although these objectives continue to be 
challenging, they are not irreconcilable, provided that: (1) 
Regulations continue to protect threatened species, (2) measures to 
address documented threats are implemented, and (3) the subsistence 
community and other conservation partners commit to working together. 
With these dual objectives in mind, the Service, working with North 
Slope partners, developed measures in 2009 to further reduce the 
potential for shooting mortality or injury of closed species. These 
conservation measures included: (1) Increased waterfowl hunter outreach 
and community awareness through partnering with the North Slope 
Migratory Bird Task Force; and (2) continued enforcement of the 
migratory bird regulations that are protective of listed eiders.
    This rule continues to focus on the North Slope from Barrow to 
Point Hope because Steller's eiders from the listed Alaska breeding 
population are known to breed and migrate there, and harvest survey 
data and direct observations indicate take during subsistence harvest 
has occurred there. These regulations are designed to address several 
ongoing eider-management needs by clarifying for subsistence users that 
(1) Service law enforcement personnel have authority to verify species 
of birds possessed by hunters, and (2) it is illegal to possess any 
species of bird closed to harvest. This rule also describes how the 
Service's existing authority of emergency closure would be implemented, 
if necessary, to protect Steller's eiders. We are always willing to 
discuss regulations with our partners on the North Slope to ensure 
protection of closed species while providing subsistence hunters an 
opportunity to maintain the culture and traditional migratory bird 
harvest of the community. These regulations pertaining to bag checks 
and possession of illegal birds are deemed necessary to monitor take of 
closed eider species during the subsistence hunt.
    In collaboration with North Slope partners, a number of 
conservation efforts have been implemented to raise awareness and 
educate hunters on Steller's eider conservation via the bird fair, 
meetings, radio shows, signs, school visits, and one-on-one contacts. 
Limited intermittent monitoring on the North Slope, focused primarily 
at Barrow, found no evidence that listed eiders were shot in 2009 
through 2012; one Steller's eider and one spectacled eider were found 
shot during the summer of 2013; one Steller's eider was found shot in 
2014; and no listed eiders were found shot in 2015 or 2016. Elsewhere 
in Alaska, one spectacled eider that appeared to have been shot was 
found dead on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta in 2015. The Service 
acknowledges progress made with the other eider conservation measures, 
including partnering with the North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force, 
for increased waterfowl-hunter awareness, continued enforcement of the 
regulations, and in-season verification of the harvest. To reduce the 
threat of shooting mortality of threatened eiders, we continue to work 
with North Slope partners to conduct education and outreach. In 
addition, the emergency-closure authority provides another level of 
assurance if an unexpected number of Steller's eiders are killed by 
shooting (50 CFR 92.21 and 50 CFR 92.32).
    In-season harvest-monitoring information will be used to evaluate 
the efficacy of regulations, conservation measures, and outreach 
efforts. Conservation measures are being continued by the Service, with 
the amount of effort and emphasis being based on regulatory adherence.
    The longstanding general emergency-closure provision at 50 CFR 
92.21 specifies that the harvest may be closed or temporarily suspended 
upon finding that a continuation of the regulation allowing the harvest 
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of any migratory bird 
population. With regard to Steller's eiders, the regulations at 50 CFR 
92.32, carried over from the past 6 years, clarify that we will take 
action under 50 CFR 92.21 as is necessary to prevent further take of 
Steller's eiders, and that action could include temporary or long-term 
closures of the harvest in all or a portion of the geographic area open 
to harvest. When and if mortality of threatened eiders is documented, 
we will evaluate each mortality event by criteria such as cause, 
quantity, sex, age, location, and date. We will consult with the Co-
management Council when we are considering an emergency closure. If we 
determine that an emergency closure is necessary, we will design it to 
minimize its impact on the subsistence harvest.

Endangered Species Act Consideration

    Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) requires 
the Secretary of the Interior to ``review other programs administered 
by him and utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of the 
Act'' and to ``insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried 
out * * * is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any 
endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction 
or adverse modification of [critical] habitat. * * *'' We conducted an 
intra-agency consultation with the Service's Fairbanks Fish and 
Wildlife Field Office on this harvest as it will be managed in 
accordance with this final rule and the conservation measures. The 
consultation was completed with a biological opinion dated March 13, 
2017, that concluded the final rule and conservation measures are not 
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of

[[Page 16302]]

Steller's and spectacled eiders or result in the destruction or adverse 
modification of designated critical habitat.

Summary of Comments and Responses

    On February 10, 2017, we published in the Federal Register a 
proposed rule (82 FR 10316) to amend 50 CFR part 92 to establish 
regulations in Alaska for the 2017 subsistence season. We accepted 
public comments on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending March 13, 
2017. We posted an announcement of the comment-period dates for the 
proposed rule, as well as the rule itself and related historical 
documents, on the Co-management Council's Internet homepage. By 
facsimile (fax), we issued a press release, announcing our request for 
public comments and the pertinent deadlines for such comments, to the 
media Statewide in Alaska. Additionally, we made all relevant documents 
available on https://www.regulations.gov. In response to the proposed 
rule, the Service received seven comments. The comments are addressed 
below by topic.
    Comments (1 and 2): We received one general comment on the overall 
regulations that expressed strong opposition to the concept of allowing 
any hunting of migratory birds in Alaska; another commenter read the 
above-mentioned comment online and rebutted it, defending waterfowl 
hunting and its sustainability.
    Service Response: For centuries, indigenous inhabitants of Alaska 
have harvested migratory birds for subsistence purposes during the 
spring and summer months. The Canada and Mexico migratory bird treaties 
were amended for the express purpose of allowing subsistence hunting 
for migratory birds during the spring and summer. The amendments 
indicate that the Service should issue regulations allowing such 
hunting as provided in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act; see 16 U.S.C. 
712(1). See also Statutory Authority, below, for more details.
    Comment (3): We received two comments on the opening of the emperor 
goose harvest that expressed support for the renewed hunt, stating that 
a properly managed hunt may actually help the birds by putting more 
money into management of the species. Also, one commenter stated that 
they were pleased this co-management effort will give Alaskans the 
opportunity to hunt emperor geese again.
    Service Response: The Service appreciates the support on this 
conservation success story for emperor geese. Additional information is 
provided in our response to Comments (4) and (5).
    Comment (4): We received two comments on opening the emperor goose 
harvest that expressed concern that the way the upcoming open 
subsistence hunt is structured poses a risk to the emperor goose 
population. Both commenters suggested lowering the number of emperor 
geese allowed to be taken.
    Service Response: The harvestable quotas were arrived at via a co-
management process that involved the Service, Alaska Department of Fish 
and Game, and Alaska Native Peoples from all regions supporting emperor 
geese. The term of this harvest strategy is 5 years. However, during 
the 3-year period (2017-2019) following implementation, available 
harvest-related data (e.g., harvest survey data, population status and 
trend, and other relevant information) will be examined and the need 
for conservation measures will be considered. Further, the harvest 
strategy adopted by the Pacific Flyway Council and the Alaska Migratory 
Bird Co-Management Council includes specific population indices 
associated with customary and traditional harvest, restricted harvest, 
and closure.
    Comment (5): We received one comment on the upcoming emperor goose 
harvest that suggested limiting the hunt to a narrower geographical 
region to protect the nesting grounds.
    Service Response: The majority of emperor geese nest on the Yukon-
Kuskokwim Delta. The Pacific Flyway Council and Alaska Migratory Bird 
Co-Management Plans incorporate the use of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Coastal 
Zone Breeding Pair Survey to monitor this population and the potential 
effects of harvest, thereby ensuring the increased likelihood of 
detecting any negative impacts to the breeding population. Finally, as 
agreed upon in the amendment of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (Japan 
Treaty), the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region is required to identify and 
enforce a 30-day closure period during the nesting season.
    The structure of the emperor goose subsistence harvest in Alaska 
was developed in a co-management process that provides equal access to 
all qualified subsistence users. However, Alaska Native peoples living 
in this region have primarily relied on Pacific white-fronted geese and 
cackling Canada geese. While important from cultural and traditional 
aspects, emperor geese have not comprised a substantive proportion of 
migratory bird harvest in this region, and we do not expect high levels 
of subsistence hunting activities on nesting grounds requiring that we 
adopt the commenter's suggestion.

Statutory Authority

    We derive our authority to issue these regulations from the 
Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, at 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which 
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with the 
treaties with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to ``issue such 
regulations as may be necessary to assure that the taking of migratory 
birds and the collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants 
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional 
and other essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the 
Interior, during seasons established so as to provide for the 
preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.''

Effective Date of This Rule

    The amendments to subparts C and D of 50 CFR part 92 will take 
effect on March 31, 2017 (see DATES, above). If there was a delay in 
the effective date of these regulations after this final rulemaking, 
subsistence hunters would not be able to take full advantage of their 
subsistence hunting opportunities. We therefore find that ``good 
cause'' exists justifying the earlier start date, within the terms of 5 
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and under 
authority of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (July 3, 1918), as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 703-712).

Required Determinations

Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)

    Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. OIRA has 
determined that this rule is not significant.
    Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while 
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote 
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most 
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. 
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches 
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for 
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and 
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further 
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that 
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open 
exchange of ideas. We have developed

[[Page 16303]]

this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.). A regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. 
Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required. This rule 
legalizes a pre-existing subsistence activity, and the resources 
harvested will be consumed.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
    (a) Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million 
or more. It legalizes and regulates a traditional subsistence activity. 
It will not result in a substantial increase in subsistence harvest or 
a significant change in harvesting patterns. The commodities that will 
be regulated under this rule are migratory birds. This rule deals with 
legalizing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds and, as such, 
does not involve commodities traded in the marketplace. A small 
economic benefit from this rule derives from the sale of equipment and 
ammunition to carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if not all, 
businesses that sell hunting equipment in rural Alaska qualify as small 
businesses. We have no reason to believe that this rule will lead to a 
disproportionate distribution of benefits.
    (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government 
agencies; or geographic regions. This rule does not deal with traded 
commodities and, therefore, will not have an impact on prices for 
consumers.
    (c) Will not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This 
rule deals with the harvesting of wildlife for personal consumption. It 
will not regulate the marketplace in any way to generate substantial 
effects on the economy or the ability of businesses to compete.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    We have determined and certified under the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this rule will not impose a cost of 
$100 million or more in any given year on local, State, or tribal 
governments or private entities. The rule does not have a significant 
or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private 
sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act is not required. Participation on regional 
management bodies and the Co-management Council requires travel 
expenses for some Alaska Native organizations and local governments. In 
addition, they assume some expenses related to coordinating involvement 
of village councils in the regulatory process. Total coordination and 
travel expenses for all Alaska Native organizations are estimated to be 
less than $300,000 per year. In a notice of decision (65 FR 16405; 
March 28, 2000), we identified 7 to 12 partner organizations (Alaska 
Native nonprofits and local governments) to administer the regional 
programs. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game also incurs expenses 
for travel to Co-management Council and regional management body 
meetings. In addition, the State of Alaska will be required to provide 
technical staff support to each of the regional management bodies and 
to the Co-management Council. Expenses for the State's involvement may 
exceed $100,000 per year, but should not exceed $150,000 per year. When 
funding permits, we make annual grant agreements available to the 
partner organizations and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to 
help offset their expenses.

Takings (Executive Order 12630)

    Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule will not 
have significant takings implications. This rule is not specific to 
particular land ownership, but applies to the harvesting of migratory 
bird resources throughout Alaska. A takings implication assessment is 
not required.

Federalism (Executive Order 13132)

    Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this rule does not 
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a 
federalism summary impact statement. We discuss effects of this rule on 
the State of Alaska in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act section, above. 
We worked with the State of Alaska to develop these regulations. 
Therefore, a federalism summary impact statement is not required.

Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)

    The Department, in promulgating this rule, has determined that it 
will not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the 
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.

Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal 
Governments

    Consistent with Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249; November 6, 
2000), ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments'', and Department of Interior policy on Consultation with 
Indian Tribes (December 1, 2011), in February 2016, we sent letters via 
electronic mail to all 229 Alaska Federally recognized Indian tribes. 
Consistent with Congressional direction (Pub. L. 108-199, div. H, Sec. 
161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108-447, div. 
H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267), we also sent 
letters to approximately 200 Alaska Native corporations and other 
tribal entities in Alaska soliciting their input if they would like the 
Service to consult with them on the 2017 migratory bird subsistence 
harvest regulations. We received no requests for consultation.
    We implemented the amended treaty with Canada with a focus on local 
involvement. The treaty calls for the creation of management bodies to 
ensure an effective and meaningful role for Alaska's indigenous 
inhabitants in the conservation of migratory birds. According to the 
Letter of Submittal, management bodies are to include Alaska Native, 
Federal, and State of Alaska representatives as equals. They develop 
recommendations for, among other things: Seasons and bag limits, 
methods and means of take, law enforcement policies, population and 
harvest monitoring, education programs, research and use of traditional 
knowledge, and habitat protection. The management bodies involve 
village councils to the maximum extent possible in all aspects of 
management. To ensure maximum input at the village level, we required 
each of the 11 participating regions to create regional management 
bodies consisting of at least one representative from the participating 
villages. The regional management bodies meet twice annually to review 
and/or submit proposals to the Statewide body.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)

    This rule does not contain any new collections of information that 
require

[[Page 16304]]

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 
3501 et seq.). We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. OMB has reviewed and approved our 
collection of information associated with:
     Voluntary annual household surveys that we use to 
determine levels of subsistence take (OMB Control Number 1018-0124, 
expires October 31, 2019).
     Permits associated with subsistence hunting (OMB Control 
Number 1018-0075, expires June 30, 2019).
     Emperor Goose Spring Subsistence Harvest Survey (to 
include number of geese harvested, age, sex, and mass of birds 
harvested associated) (OMB Control Number 1090-0011, expires August 31, 
2018).

National Environmental Policy Act Consideration (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.)

    The annual regulations and options are considered in a December 
2016 environmental assessment, ``Managing Migratory Bird Subsistence 
Hunting in Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the 2017 Spring/Summer 
Harvest.'' Copies are available from the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or at https://www.regulations.gov.

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211)

    Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of 
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. This is not a 
significant regulatory action under this Executive Order; it allows 
only for traditional subsistence harvest and improves conservation of 
migratory birds by allowing effective regulation of this harvest. 
Further, this rule is not expected to significantly affect energy 
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is not a 
significant energy action under Executive Order 13211, and a Statement 
of Energy Effects is not required.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92

    Hunting, Treaties, Wildlife.

Regulation Promulgation

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, we amend title 50, chapter 
I, subchapter G, of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 92--MIGRATORY BIRD SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA

0
1. The authority citation for part 92 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 703-712.

Subpart C--General Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest

0
2. Amend Sec.  92.22 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(3) as paragraph (a)(4);
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (a)(6).
    The addition and revision read as follows:


Sec.  92.22  Subsistence migratory bird species.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (3) Emperor goose (Chen canagica).
* * * * *
    (6) Canada goose, subspecies cackling goose.
* * * * *

Subpart D--Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest

0
3. Amend subpart D by adding Sec.  92.31 to read as follows:


Sec.  92.31  Region-specific regulations.

    The 2017 season dates for the eligible subsistence-harvest areas 
are as follows:
    (a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
    (1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
    (i) Season: April 2-June 30.
    (ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
    (2) Central Unit (Aleutian Region's eastern boundary on the Alaska 
Peninsula westward to and including Unalaska Island):
    (i) Season: April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31.
    (ii) Closure: June 16-July 15.
    (iii) Special Black Brant Season Closure: August 16-August 31, only 
in Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
    (iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All hunting and egg gathering 
closed in Game Management Units 9(D) and 10.
    (3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west to and including Attu Island):
    (i) Season: April 2-July 15 and August 16-August 31.
    (ii) Closure: July 16-August 15.
    (b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
    (1) Season: April 2-August 31.
    (2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be announced by the Service's 
Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with field 
biologists and the Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl 
Conservation Committee. This 30-day period will occur between June 1 
and August 15 of each year. A press release announcing the actual 
closure dates will be forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and 
television stations.
    (3) Special Black Brant and Cackling Canada Goose Season Hunting 
Closure: From the period when egg laying begins until young birds are 
fledged. Closure dates to be announced by the Service's Alaska Regional 
Director or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and 
the Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl Conservation 
Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be 
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations.
    (c) Bristol Bay Region.
    (1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 (general season); 
April 2-July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
    (2) Closure: June 15-July 15 (general season); July 16-August 31 
(seabird egg gathering).
    (d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound Region.
    (1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point Romanof to Canal Point):
    (i) Season: April 15-June 14 and July 16-August 31.
    (ii) Closure: June 15-July 15.
    (2) Remainder of the region:
    (i) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 for waterfowl; 
April 2-July 19 and August 21-August 31 for all other birds.
    (ii) Closure: June 15-July 15 for waterfowl; July 20-August 20 for 
all other birds.
    (e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except for the Kodiak Island roaded 
area, which is closed to the harvesting of migratory birds and their 
eggs. The closed area consists of all lands and waters (including 
exposed tidelands) east of a line extending from Crag Point in the 
north to the west end of Saltery Cove in the south and all lands and 
water south of a line extending from Termination Point along the north 
side of Cascade Lake extending to Anton Larsen Bay. Marine waters 
adjacent to the closed area are closed to harvest within 500 feet from 
the water's edge. The offshore islands are open to harvest.
    (1) Season: April 2-June 30 and July 31-August 31 for seabirds; 
April 2-June 20 and July 22-August 31 for all other birds.
    (2) Closure: July 1-July 30 for seabirds; June 21-July 21 for all 
other birds.
    (f) Northwest Arctic Region.
    (1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 (hunting in 
general); waterfowl egg gathering April 2-June 14 only; seabird egg 
gathering May 20-July 12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting waterfowl 
July 1-July 15 only.

[[Page 16305]]

    (2) Closure: June 15-July 15, except for the taking of seabird eggs 
and molting/non-nesting waterfowl as provided in paragraph (f)(1) of 
this section.
    (g) North Slope Region.
    (1) Southern Unit (Southwestern North Slope regional boundary east 
to Peard Bay, everything west of the longitude line 158[deg]30' W. and 
south of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N. to the west bank of the 
Ikpikpuk River, and everything south of the latitude line 69[deg]45' N. 
between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of 
Sagavinirktok River):
    (i) Season: April 2-June 29 and July 30-August 31 for seabirds; 
April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31 for all other birds.
    (ii) Closure: June 30-July 29 for seabirds; June 20-July 19 for all 
other birds.
    (iii) Special Black Brant Hunting Opening: From June 20-July 5. The 
open area consists of the coastline, from mean high water line outward 
to include open water, from Nokotlek Point east to longitude line 
158[deg]30' W. This includes Peard Bay, Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright 
Inlet, but not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages.
    (2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay, everything east of the longitude 
line 158[deg]30' W. and north of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N. to 
west bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything north of the latitude 
line 69[deg]45' N. between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the 
east bank of Sagavinirktok River):
    (i) Season: April 2-June 6 and July 7-August 31 for king and common 
eiders; April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31 for all other birds.
    (ii) Closure: June 7-July 6 for king and common eiders; June 16-
July 15 for all other birds.
    (3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank of the Sagavanirktok River):
    (i) Season: April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31.
    (ii) Closure: June 20-July 19.
    (4) All Units: yellow-billed loons. Annually, up to 20 yellow-
billed loons total for the region inadvertently entangled in 
subsistence fishing nets in the North Slope Region may be kept for 
subsistence use.
    (5) North Coastal Zone (Cape Thompson north to Point Hope and east 
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around Point Barrow to Ross Point, 
including Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
    (i) No person may at any time, by any means, or in any manner, 
possess or have in custody any migratory bird or part thereof, taken in 
violation of subparts C and D of this part.
    (ii) Upon request from a Service law enforcement officer, hunters 
taking, attempting to take, or transporting migratory birds taken 
during the subsistence harvest season must present them to the officer 
for species identification.
    (h) Interior Region.
    (1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31; egg gathering 
May 1-June 14 only.
    (2) Closure: June 15-July 15.
    (i) Upper Copper River Region (Harvest Area: Game Management Units 
11 and 13) (Eligible communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper 
Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake, Chistochina and Cantwell).
    (1) Season: April 15-May 26 and June 27-August 31.
    (2) Closure: May 27-June 26.
    (3) The Copper River Basin communities listed above also documented 
traditional use harvesting birds in Game Management Unit 12, making 
them eligible to hunt in this unit using the seasons specified in 
paragraph (h) of this section.
    (j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
    (1) Prince William Sound Area West (Harvest area: Game Management 
Unit 6[D]), (Eligible Chugach communities: Chenega Bay, Tatitlek):
    (i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
    (ii) Closure: June 1-30.
    (2) Prince William Sound Area East (Harvest area: Game Management 
Units 6[B]and [C]--Barrier Islands between Strawberry Channel and 
Softtuk Bar), (Eligible Chugach communities: Cordova, Tatitlek, and 
Chenega Bay):
    (i) Season: April 2-April 30 (hunting); May 1-May 31 (gull egg 
gathering).
    (ii) Closure: May 1-August 31 (hunting); April 2-30 and June 1-
August 31 (gull egg gathering).
    (iii) Species Open for Hunting: greater white-fronted goose; snow 
goose; gadwall; Eurasian and American wigeon; blue-winged and green-
winged teal; mallard; northern shoveler; northern pintail; canvasback; 
redhead; ring-necked duck; greater and lesser scaup; king and common 
eider; harlequin duck; surf, white-winged, and black scoter; long-
tailed duck; bufflehead; common and Barrow's goldeneye; hooded, common, 
and red-breasted merganser; and sandhill crane. Species open for egg 
gathering: Glaucous-winged, herring, and mew gulls.
    (iv) Use of Boats/All-Terrain Vehicles: No hunting from motorized 
vehicles or any form of watercraft.
    (v) Special Registration: All hunters or egg gatherers must possess 
an annual permit, which is available from the Cordova offices of the 
Native Village of Eyak and the U. S. Forest Service.
    (3) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area: Game Management Unit 15[C] 
South of a line connecting the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of Fox 
River) (Eligible Chugach Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek):
    (i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
    (ii) Closure: June 1-30.
    (k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions of Game Management Unit 
16[B] as specified below) (Eligible communities: Tyonek only):
    (1) Season: April 2-May 31--That portion of Game Management Unit 
16(B) south of the Skwentna River and west of the Yentna River, and 
August 1-31--That portion of Game Management Unit 16(B) south of the 
Beluga River, Beluga Lake, and the Triumvirate Glacier.
    (2) Closure: June 1-July 31.
    (l) Southeast Alaska.
    (1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest area: National Forest lands in Icy 
Strait and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass Rock near the Inian 
Islands, Table Rock in Cross Sound, and other traditional locations on 
the coast of Yakobi Island. The land and waters of Glacier Bay National 
Park remain closed to all subsistence harvesting (50 CFR part 
100.3(a)):
    (i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June 
30.
    (ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
    (2) Communities of Craig and Hydaburg (Harvest area: Small islands 
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince of Wales Island from Point 
Baker to Cape Chacon, but also including Coronation and Warren 
islands):
    (i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June 
30.
    (ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
    (3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest area: Icy Bay (Icy Cape to Point 
Riou), and coastal lands and islands bordering the Gulf of Alaska from 
Point Manby southeast to and including Dry Bay):
    (i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering: May 15-June 30.
    (ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.

0
4. Amend subpart D by adding Sec.  92.32 to read as follows:


Sec.  92.32  Emergency regulations to protect Steller's eiders.

    Upon finding that continuation of these subsistence regulations 
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of threatened 
Steller's eiders (Polysticta stelleri), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service Alaska Regional Director, in consultation with the Co-
management Council, will immediately under Sec.  92.21 take action as 
is necessary to prevent further take. Regulation

[[Page 16306]]

changes implemented could range from a temporary closure of duck 
hunting in a small geographic area to large-scale regional or Statewide 
long-term closures of all subsistence migratory bird hunting. These 
closures or temporary suspensions will remain in effect until the 
Regional Director, in consultation with the Co-management Council, 
determines that the potential for additional Steller's eiders to be 
taken no longer exists.

    Dated: March 28, 2017.
 Maureen D. Foster,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2017-06592 Filed 3-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.