Amendment to the Privacy Shield Cost Recovery Fees, 16375-16378 [2017-06437]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
•
•
•
•
•
Molybdenum 0.35–0.55,
Boron 0.002–0.004,
Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm,
Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and
Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm;
(b) Having cleanliness in accordance with
ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A
not exceeding 1.5, B not exceeding 1.5, C not
exceeding 1.0, D not exceeding 1.5;
(c) Having the following mechanical
properties:
(i) With a Brinell hardness not more than
237 HBW measured in all parts of the
product including mid thickness; and having
a Yield Strength of 75ksi min and UTS 95ksi
or more, Elongation of 18% or more and
Reduction of area 35% or more; having
charpy V at ¥75 degrees F in the
longitudinal direction equal or greater than
15 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater
than 20 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens) and
conforming to the requirements of NACE
MR01–75; or
(ii) With a Brinell hardness not less than
240 HBW measured in all parts of the
product including mid thickness; and having
a Yield Strength of 90 ksi min and UTS 110
ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more and
Reduction of area 30% or more; having
charpy V at ¥40 degrees F in the
longitudinal direction equal or greater than
21 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater
than 31 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens);
(d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9
ultrasonic testing requirements with
acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole;
and
(e) Conforming to magnetic particle
inspection in accordance with AMS 2301;
(7) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate
over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting
the following requirements:
(a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted,
ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel
with the following chemical composition
(expressed in weight percentages):
• Carbon 0.25–0.30,
• Silicon not greater than 0.25,
• Manganese not greater than 0.50,
• Nickel 3.0–3.5,
• Sulfur not greater than 0.010,
• Phosphorus not greater than 0.020,
• Chromium 1.0–1.5,
• Molybdenum 0.6–0.9,
• Vanadium 0.08 to 0.12
• Boron 0.002–0.004,
• Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm,
• Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and
• Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm.
(b) Having cleanliness in accordance with
ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A
not exceeding 1.0(t) and 0.5(h), B not
exceeding 1.5(t) and 1.0(h), C not exceeding
1.0(t) and 0.5(h), and D not exceeding 1.5(t)
and 1.0(h);
(c) Having the following mechanical
properties: A Brinell hardness not less than
350 HBW measured in all parts of the
product including mid thickness; and having
a Yield Strength of 145ksi or more and UTS
160ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more
and Reduction of area 35% or more; having
charpy V at ¥40 degrees F in the transverse
direction equal or greater than 20 ft. lbs
(single value) and equal or greater than 25 ft.
lbs (average of 3 specimens);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
(d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9
ultrasonic testing requirements with
acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole;
and
(e) Conforming to magnetic particle
inspection in accordance with AMS 2301.
The products subject to the investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7208.40.3030,
7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7211.13.0000,
7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110,
7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 7225.40.3050,
7226.20.0000, and 7226.91.5000.
The products subject to the investigation
may also enter under the following HTSUS
item numbers: 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000,
7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000,
7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.4500,
7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7590, 7211.90.0000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000,
7214.10.0000, 7214.30.0010, 7214.30.0080,
7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090,
7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.40.5110,
7225.40.5130, 7225.40.5160, 7225.40.7000,
7225.99.0010, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000,
7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000,
7226.91.0500, 7226.91.1530, 7226.91.1560,
7226.91.2530, 7226.91.2560, 7226.91.7000,
7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0180.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes only. The written description of the
scope of the investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Use of Adverse Facts Available
a. China Steel
b. Shang Chen
IV. Scope of the Investigation
V. Scope Comments
VI. Affiliations and Collapsing
VII. Margin Calculations
VIII. Discussion of Issues
a. China Steel
1. Whether to Apply Total Adverse Facts
Available to China Steel
2. China Steel Excluded Operating Costs
3. China Steel Under-Reported Prime
Merchandise
4. China Steel Under-Reported G&A
Expenses
5. China Steel Under-Reported Interest
Expenses
6. China Steel Improperly Reduced COGS
7. China Steel Date of Sale
8. China Steel Home Market Post-Sale Price
Adjustments
9. China Steel Destination Codes
10. China Steel Packing Expenses
11. Critical Circumstances
12. Alleged Errors in China Steel
Verification Report
b. Shang Chen
13. Total Adverse Facts Available for
Shang Chen
14. Adjustments to the Reported Per-Unit
Cost of Manufacturing
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16375
15. Shang Chen General and
Administrative Expenses
16. Shang Chen Scrap Offset
17. Quarterly Cost Data
18. Shang Chen Differential Pricing
Analysis
19. Shang Chen Date of Sale
20. Shang Chen Sales-Related Revenues
21. Shang Chen Reported Packing Cost
22. Alleged Error in Shang Chen’s Margin
Calculation Program
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–06703 Filed 4–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Docket No.: 170301219–7219–01]
RIN 0625–XC029
Amendment to the Privacy Shield Cost
Recovery Fees
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of amendment to the
Privacy Shield cost recovery program
fees, with request for comments.
AGENCY:
Consistent with the
guidelines in OMB Circular A–25, the
U.S. Department of Commerce’s
International Trade Administration
(ITA) is revising the fee schedule
implemented on August 1, 2016. On
January 12, 2017, the Swiss Government
announced the approval of the SwissU.S. Privacy Shield Framework as a
valid legal mechanism to comply with
Swiss requirements when transferring
personal data from Switzerland to the
United States. For more detailed
information on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework and the
announcement, please see https://
www.privacyshield.gov/ProgramOverview.
This notice revises the Privacy Shield
fee structure to incorporate the SwissU.S. Privacy Shield Framework in
addition to the existing EU–U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework. This is to support
the operation of both the EU–U.S. and
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks
(Privacy Shield).
DATES: These fees are effective April 12,
2017. Comments must be received by
May 4, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.Regulations.gov. The identification
number is ITA–2017–0001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery to
Joshua Blume, Department of
Commerce, International Trade
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
16376
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administration, Room 11022, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC and reference ‘‘Privacy Shield Fee
Structure, ITA–2017–0001’’ in the
subject line.
Instructions: You must submit
comments by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received and considered. Comments
sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after
the end of the comment period, may not
be considered. All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. ITA will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats
only. Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/ ITA–2017–0001.
More information regarding the
Privacy Shield can be found at https://
www.privacyshield.gov/ProgramOverview.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
regarding the EU–U.S. and Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield Frameworks should be
directed to Joshua Blume, Department of
Commerce, International Trade
Administration, Room 11022, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC, tel. 202–482–0988 or 202–482–1512
or via email at privacyshield@trade.gov.
Additional information on ITA fees is
available at trade.gov/fees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
In the revised fee structure, there will
be one annual fee applied to U.S.
organizations to participate in either the
Swiss–U.S. or EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks. Should a U.S. organization
opt to self-certify for both programs,
they will be provided a reduced rate for
the second Framework and be required
to synchronize their recertifications to
both Frameworks to maximize
efficiency. Additionally, a fee will be
applied annually to organizations that
withdraw from the Privacy Shield and
continue to maintain data received
while they participated in the Privacy
Shield. The cost recovery program will
support the administration and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
supervision of the Privacy Shield and
support Privacy Shield services
including education and outreach. The
revised Privacy Shield fee structure will
become effective on April 12, 2017,
when ITA will begin accepting
certifications to the Swiss–U.S. Privacy
Shield.
While the revised fees will be
effective April 12, 2017, ITA is
providing the public with the
opportunity to comment on these
revised fees. ITA will then review all
comments and reassess the Privacy
Shield fees after August 1, 2017, a full
year from initial implementation of
Privacy Shield, as originally discussed
in the Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
published September 30, 2016. The
review will recur at least every two
years thereafter, in accordance with
OMB Circular A–25.
Consistent with the guidelines in
OMB Circular A–25, federal agencies are
responsible for implementing cost
recovery program fees. The role of ITA
is to strengthen the competitiveness of
U.S. industry, promote trade and
investment, and ensure fair trade
through the rigorous enforcement of our
trade laws and agreements. ITA works
to promote privacy policy frameworks
to facilitate the flow of data across
borders and support international trade.
The United States, the European
Union (EU), and Switzerland share the
goal of enhancing privacy protection but
take different approaches to protecting
personal data. Given those differences,
the Department of Commerce (DOC)
developed the Privacy Shield
Frameworks in consultation with the
European Commission, the Swiss
Government, and with industry and
other stakeholders, to provide
organizations in the United States with
a reliable mechanism for personal data
transfers to the United States from the
European Union and Switzerland while
ensuring the data is protected in a
manner consistent with EU and Swiss
law.
As referenced in the Cost Recovery
Fee Schedule for the EU–U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework, published
September 30, 2016 (81 FR 67293), the
European Commission approved the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework on
July 12, 2016. More recently, on January
12, 2017, the Swiss government
approved the Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, which is based on the EU–
U.S. Privacy Shield. The published
Privacy Shield is available at https://
www.privacyshield.gov/. The DOC has
issued the Privacy Shield Framework
Principles under its statutory authority
to foster, promote, and develop
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
international commerce (15 U.S.C.
1512).
ITA administers and supervises the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
including by maintaining and making
publicly available an authoritative list of
U.S. organizations that have selfcertified to the DOC. U.S. organizations
submit information to ITA to self-certify
their compliance with Privacy Shield.
ITA similarly will administer and
supervise the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework. ITA will accept selfcertification submissions for the SwissU.S. Privacy Shield beginning on April
12, 2017. Consistent with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, ITA published proposed
information collections as described in
the EU–U.S. and Swiss–U.S. Privacy
Shield Frameworks for public notice
and comment (81 FR 78775 and 82 FR
7796; and 82 FR 6492, respectively).
U.S. organizations considering selfcertifying to the Privacy Shield should
review the Privacy Shield Frameworks.
In summary, to enter either the EU or
Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
an organization must (a) be subject to
the investigatory and enforcement
powers of the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) or the Department of
Transportation; (b) publicly declare its
commitment to comply with the Privacy
Shield Framework Principles through
self-certification to the DOC; (c) publicly
disclose its privacy policies in line with
the Privacy Shield Framework
Principles; and (d) fully implement
them.
Self-certification to the DOC is
voluntary. However, an organization’s
failure to comply with the Privacy
Shield Framework Principles after its
self-certification is enforceable under
Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act prohibiting unfair and
deceptive acts in or affecting commerce
(15 U.S.C. 45(a)) or other laws or
regulations prohibiting such acts.
ITA implemented a cost recovery
program to support the operation of the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield and is revising
that fee schedule to additionally support
the operation of the Swiss–U.S. Privacy
Shield. The fee a given organization will
be charged will be based on the
organization’s annual revenue. A
separate fee will be applied annually to
organizations that withdraw from the
Privacy Shield and continue to maintain
data received while they participated in
the Privacy Shield. The cost recovery
program will support the administration
and supervision of the Privacy Shield
program and support the provision of
Privacy Shield-related services,
including education and outreach.
The Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Notices
published September 30, 2016 (81 FR
67293), describes the fees implemented
by ITA to cover the administration and
supervision of the EU–U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework. Under this revision
to the fee structure, organizations that
join only one Privacy Shield
Framework, whether EU or Swiss, will
pay the same single fee when initially
self-certifying or re-certifying.
Organizations that join both
Frameworks will pay an additional 50
percent of that single fee when selfcertifying or re-certifying for the second
Framework, reflecting the efficiency
savings in administering the Program for
organizations that participate in both
Frameworks.
These efficiency savings are
maximized if organizations self-certify
to both Frameworks simultaneously,
reducing the required staff time and
resources for reviewing materials.
Accordingly, organizations that join
both Frameworks will be required to
synchronize recertification between the
EU–U.S. and Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks by renewing their
certifications to both Frameworks
simultaneously.
In addition, in order to allow
organizations to set their own annual
schedules, organizations that participate
in one or both Frameworks may adjust
their annual recertification date by recertifying early to one or both
Frameworks.
For example, organizations that
already have joined the EU Framework
and wish to join the Swiss Framework
as well will have three options for
timing the synchronized recertification.
Such organizations may (a) self-certify
to the Swiss Framework before the EU
renewal comes due and re-certify early
to the EU Framework at the same time;
(b) wait until their certification to the
EU Framework is up for renewal and
self-certify to the Swiss Framework at
the same time as they renew their
certification to the EU Framework; or (c)
self-certify to the Swiss Framework
separately (without waiting for their
recertification to the EU Framework to
come due), and then re-certify to both
Frameworks when their recertification
to the EU Framework comes due.
Finally, a fixed annual fee of $200
will be charged for organizations that
withdraw from the Privacy Shield and
maintain data received under Privacy
Shield. This fee has been set to cover
staff costs for reviewing the
questionnaires of organizations
withdrawing from the program, as well
as the necessary Web site infrastructure
to facilitate submission of the proper
documents. Additionally, this fee is set
to be less than any organization would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
be required to pay for recertification.
These fees are set forth below:
REVISED ANNUAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR
THE EU–U.S. AND SWISS–U.S. PRIVACY SHIELD FRAMEWORKS
Organization’s annual
revenue
$0 to $5 million ................
Over $5 million to $25
million ...........................
Over $25 million to $500
million ...........................
Over $500 million to $5
billion ............................
Over $5 billion .................
Both
frameworks
Single
framework
$250
$375
650
975
1,000
1,500
2,500
3,250
3,750
4,875
Annual Fee for Retaining Data after
Withdrawal: $200.
Organizations will have additional
direct costs associated with
participating in the Privacy Shield. For
example, Privacy Shield organizations
must provide a readily available
independent recourse mechanism to
hear individual complaints at no cost to
the individual. Furthermore,
organizations will be required to pay
contributions in connection with the
arbitral model, as described in Annex I
to the Principles.
Method for Determining Fees
ITA collects, retains, and expends
user fees pursuant to delegated
authority under the Mutual Educational
and Cultural Exchange Act as
authorized in its annual appropriations
acts. The Privacy Shield was developed
to provide organizations in the United
States with a reliable mechanism for
personal data transfers that underpin
the trade and investment relationships
between the United States and (1) the
EU, and (2) Switzerland. As one of only
several valid data transfer mechanisms,
Privacy Shield operates in a way that
provides strong consumer protection as
well as a more effective and efficient
service to corporations at a lower cost
than other options, including standard
contractual clauses or binding corporate
rules.
Fees are set taking into account the
operational costs borne by ITA to
administer and supervise the Privacy
Shield program. As described in the
Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU–
U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
published September 30, 2016 (81 FR
267293), the Privacy Shield program
requires a significant commitment of
resources and staff. These costs include
broad programmatic costs to run the
Privacy Shield as well as costs specific
to each of the Privacy Shield
Frameworks and to the program that
allows Participants to retain data after
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16377
withdrawal from Privacy Shield. The
Privacy Shield includes commitments
from ITA to:
• Maintain, upgrade, and update a
Privacy Shield Web site;
• verify self-certification
requirements submitted by
organizations to participate in the
Privacy Shield;
• expand efforts to follow up with
organizations that have been removed
from the Privacy Shield List and ensure,
where applicable, that questionnaires
are correctly filed and processed;
• search for and address false claims
of participation;
• conduct periodic compliance
reviews and assessments of the program;
• provide information regarding the
program to targeted audiences;
• increase cooperation with EU and
Swiss data protection authorities;
• facilitate resolution of complaints
about non-compliance;
• hold annual meetings with the
European Commission, Swiss
government, and other authorities to
review the program; and
• provide an update of laws relevant
to Privacy Shield.
In setting these revised Privacy Shield
fees, ITA determined that the services
provided offer special benefits to an
identifiable recipient beyond those that
accrue to the general public. ITA
calculated the actual cost of providing
its services in order to provide a basis
for setting each fee. This actual cost
incorporates direct and indirect costs,
including operations and maintenance,
overhead, and charges for the use of
capital facilities. ITA also took into
account additional factors, including
adequacy of cost recovery, affordability,
and costs associated with alternative
options available to U.S. organizations
for the receipt of personal data from the
EU and Switzerland. Furthermore, ITA
considered the cost-savings and
efficiencies gained in staff hours
through simultaneous review of selfcertifications for both the Swiss–U.S.
and EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks. This analysis balanced
these cost savings with projected
expenses, including, but not limited to,
Web site development, further
negotiations with the EU and
Switzerland, an annual review,
certification review, and facilitating
complaint resolutions.
ITA will continue to use the
established five-tiered fee schedule (81
FR 267293) that has promoted
participation of small organizations in
Privacy Shield, while implementing a
reduced rate for organizations selfcertifying to both the Swiss–U.S. and
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks. A
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
16378
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 4, 2017 / Notices
multiple-tiered fee schedule allows ITA
to offer organizations with lower
revenue a lower fee. In setting the five
tiers, ITA considered, in conjunction
with the factors mentioned above: (1)
The Small Business Administration’s
guidance on identifying small and
medium enterprises (SMEs) in various
industries most likely to participate in
the Privacy Shield, such as computer
services, software and information
services; (2) the likelihood that small
companies would be expected to receive
less personal data and thereby use fewer
government resources; and (3) the
likelihood that companies with higher
revenue would have more customers
whose data they process, which would
use more government resources
dedicated to administering and
overseeing Privacy Shield. For example,
if a company holds more data it could
reasonably produce more questions and
complaints from consumers and EU and
Swiss Data Protection Authorities
(DPAs). ITA has committed to
facilitating the resolution of individual
complaints and to communicating with
the FTC and the DPAs regarding
consumer complaints. Lastly, the fee
increases between the tiers are based in
part on projected program costs and
estimated participation levels among
companies within each tier.
As noted above, the revised fee
schedule recoups the costs to ITA for
operating and maintaining Privacy
Shield. Organizations seeking to join the
Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
may do so beginning on April 12, 2017,
through Privacyshield.gov. ITA has
taken into account efficiencies and
economies of scale experienced when
organizations participate in both
Frameworks by providing a 50 percent
discount off the second Framework and
requiring organizations to synchronize
their recertifications. The added cost of
joining a second Framework reflects the
additional expenses incurred, including,
but not limited to, for communications
with DPAs and Web site infrastructure
and development, as well as the
additional costs of cooperating and
communicating separately with the EU
and Swiss representatives and
governments.
The fee applied to organizations that
withdraw from Privacy Shield but
maintain data is meant to cover the
programmatic costs associated with
ITA’s processing of such organizations’
annual affirmation of commitment to
continue to apply the Privacy Shield
Framework Principles to the personal
information they received while
participating in the Privacy Shield. The
flat fee is based on the expectation that
government resources required to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Apr 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
process this annual affirmation will be
similar for all companies, regardless of
size.
Conclusion
Based on the information provided
above, ITA believes that the revised
Privacy Shield cost recovery fees are
consistent with the objective of OMB
Circular A–25 to ‘‘promote efficient
allocation of the nation’s resources by
establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least
as great as the cost to the U.S.
Government of providing the special
benefits . . .’’ OMB Circular A–25(5)(b).
ITA is providing the public with the
opportunity to comment on the fee
schedule, and it will consider these
comments when it next reassesses the
fee schedule. As noted in the Cost
Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework, published
September 30, 2016 (81 FR 267293), ITA
will conduct its next fee reassessment
after August 1, 2017, at the conclusion
of the first year of implementation of the
Privacy Shield. ITA will continue to
conduct reassessments thereafter at least
every two years, in accordance with
OMB Circular A–25.
Dated: March 28, 2017.
Alysha Taylor,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Services, Industry & Analysis, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2017–06437 Filed 4–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–812]
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From Belgium: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Final Determination of
Critical Circumstances, in Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that certain
carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length
plate (CTL plate) from Belgium is being,
or is likely to be, sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV). In
addition, we determine that critical
circumstances exist with respect to
imports of the subject merchandise. The
period of investigation (POI) is April 1,
2015, through March 31, 2016. The final
dumping margins of sales at LTFV are
listed below in the ‘‘Final
Determination’’ section of this notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DATES:
Effective April 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Medley or David Crespo, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4987 and (202) 482–3693,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 14, 2016, the
Department published the Preliminary
Determination of sales at LTFV of CTL
plate from Belgium.1 A summary of the
events that occurred since the
Department published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.2
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation covers
CTL plate from Belgium. For a complete
description of the scope of the
investigation, see Appendix I.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties in this
investigation are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of
the issues raised is attached to this
notice as Appendix II. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B–8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and
electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Belgium: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 79431
(November 14, 2016) (Preliminary Determination).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation of Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cutto-Length Plate from Belgium,’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16375-16378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06437]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Docket No.: 170301219-7219-01]
RIN 0625-XC029
Amendment to the Privacy Shield Cost Recovery Fees
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of amendment to the Privacy Shield cost recovery program
fees, with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Consistent with the guidelines in OMB Circular A-25, the U.S.
Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration (ITA) is
revising the fee schedule implemented on August 1, 2016. On January 12,
2017, the Swiss Government announced the approval of the Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework as a valid legal mechanism to comply with
Swiss requirements when transferring personal data from Switzerland to
the United States. For more detailed information on the Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework and the announcement, please see https://www.privacyshield.gov/Program-Overview.
This notice revises the Privacy Shield fee structure to incorporate
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework in addition to the existing EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. This is to support the operation of both
the EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks (Privacy Shield).
DATES: These fees are effective April 12, 2017. Comments must be
received by May 4, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.Regulations.gov. The
identification number is ITA-2017-0001.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery to Joshua Blume,
Department of Commerce, International Trade
[[Page 16376]]
Administration, Room 11022, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC and reference ``Privacy Shield Fee Structure, ITA-2017-0001'' in the
subject line.
Instructions: You must submit comments by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are received and considered. Comments sent
by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received
after the end of the comment period, may not be considered. All
comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information. ITA will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the
required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe
PDF file formats only. Supporting documents and any comments we receive
on this docket may be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/ ITA-2017-
0001.
More information regarding the Privacy Shield can be found at
https://www.privacyshield.gov/Program-Overview.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
regarding the EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks should
be directed to Joshua Blume, Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration, Room 11022, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, tel. 202-482-0988 or 202-482-1512 or via email at
privacyshield@trade.gov. Additional information on ITA fees is
available at trade.gov/fees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
In the revised fee structure, there will be one annual fee applied
to U.S. organizations to participate in either the Swiss-U.S. or EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks. Should a U.S. organization opt to self-
certify for both programs, they will be provided a reduced rate for the
second Framework and be required to synchronize their recertifications
to both Frameworks to maximize efficiency. Additionally, a fee will be
applied annually to organizations that withdraw from the Privacy Shield
and continue to maintain data received while they participated in the
Privacy Shield. The cost recovery program will support the
administration and supervision of the Privacy Shield and support
Privacy Shield services including education and outreach. The revised
Privacy Shield fee structure will become effective on April 12, 2017,
when ITA will begin accepting certifications to the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield.
While the revised fees will be effective April 12, 2017, ITA is
providing the public with the opportunity to comment on these revised
fees. ITA will then review all comments and reassess the Privacy Shield
fees after August 1, 2017, a full year from initial implementation of
Privacy Shield, as originally discussed in the Cost Recovery Fee
Schedule for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, published September
30, 2016. The review will recur at least every two years thereafter, in
accordance with OMB Circular A-25.
Consistent with the guidelines in OMB Circular A-25, federal
agencies are responsible for implementing cost recovery program fees.
The role of ITA is to strengthen the competitiveness of U.S. industry,
promote trade and investment, and ensure fair trade through the
rigorous enforcement of our trade laws and agreements. ITA works to
promote privacy policy frameworks to facilitate the flow of data across
borders and support international trade.
The United States, the European Union (EU), and Switzerland share
the goal of enhancing privacy protection but take different approaches
to protecting personal data. Given those differences, the Department of
Commerce (DOC) developed the Privacy Shield Frameworks in consultation
with the European Commission, the Swiss Government, and with industry
and other stakeholders, to provide organizations in the United States
with a reliable mechanism for personal data transfers to the United
States from the European Union and Switzerland while ensuring the data
is protected in a manner consistent with EU and Swiss law.
As referenced in the Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework, published September 30, 2016 (81 FR 67293),
the European Commission approved the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
on July 12, 2016. More recently, on January 12, 2017, the Swiss
government approved the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, which is
based on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. The published Privacy Shield is
available at https://www.privacyshield.gov/. The DOC has issued the
Privacy Shield Framework Principles under its statutory authority to
foster, promote, and develop international commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512).
ITA administers and supervises the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, including by maintaining and making publicly available an
authoritative list of U.S. organizations that have self-certified to
the DOC. U.S. organizations submit information to ITA to self-certify
their compliance with Privacy Shield. ITA similarly will administer and
supervise the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. ITA will accept
self-certification submissions for the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
beginning on April 12, 2017. Consistent with the Paperwork Reduction
Act, ITA published proposed information collections as described in the
EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks for public notice and
comment (81 FR 78775 and 82 FR 7796; and 82 FR 6492, respectively).
U.S. organizations considering self-certifying to the Privacy
Shield should review the Privacy Shield Frameworks. In summary, to
enter either the EU or Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, an
organization must (a) be subject to the investigatory and enforcement
powers of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Department of
Transportation; (b) publicly declare its commitment to comply with the
Privacy Shield Framework Principles through self-certification to the
DOC; (c) publicly disclose its privacy policies in line with the
Privacy Shield Framework Principles; and (d) fully implement them.
Self-certification to the DOC is voluntary. However, an
organization's failure to comply with the Privacy Shield Framework
Principles after its self-certification is enforceable under Section 5
of the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibiting unfair and deceptive
acts in or affecting commerce (15 U.S.C. 45(a)) or other laws or
regulations prohibiting such acts.
ITA implemented a cost recovery program to support the operation of
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and is revising that fee schedule to
additionally support the operation of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield.
The fee a given organization will be charged will be based on the
organization's annual revenue. A separate fee will be applied annually
to organizations that withdraw from the Privacy Shield and continue to
maintain data received while they participated in the Privacy Shield.
The cost recovery program will support the administration and
supervision of the Privacy Shield program and support the provision of
Privacy Shield-related services, including education and outreach.
The Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework,
[[Page 16377]]
published September 30, 2016 (81 FR 67293), describes the fees
implemented by ITA to cover the administration and supervision of the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. Under this revision to the fee
structure, organizations that join only one Privacy Shield Framework,
whether EU or Swiss, will pay the same single fee when initially self-
certifying or re-certifying. Organizations that join both Frameworks
will pay an additional 50 percent of that single fee when self-
certifying or re-certifying for the second Framework, reflecting the
efficiency savings in administering the Program for organizations that
participate in both Frameworks.
These efficiency savings are maximized if organizations self-
certify to both Frameworks simultaneously, reducing the required staff
time and resources for reviewing materials. Accordingly, organizations
that join both Frameworks will be required to synchronize
recertification between the EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks by renewing their certifications to both Frameworks
simultaneously.
In addition, in order to allow organizations to set their own
annual schedules, organizations that participate in one or both
Frameworks may adjust their annual recertification date by re-
certifying early to one or both Frameworks.
For example, organizations that already have joined the EU
Framework and wish to join the Swiss Framework as well will have three
options for timing the synchronized recertification. Such organizations
may (a) self-certify to the Swiss Framework before the EU renewal comes
due and re-certify early to the EU Framework at the same time; (b) wait
until their certification to the EU Framework is up for renewal and
self-certify to the Swiss Framework at the same time as they renew
their certification to the EU Framework; or (c) self-certify to the
Swiss Framework separately (without waiting for their recertification
to the EU Framework to come due), and then re-certify to both
Frameworks when their recertification to the EU Framework comes due.
Finally, a fixed annual fee of $200 will be charged for
organizations that withdraw from the Privacy Shield and maintain data
received under Privacy Shield. This fee has been set to cover staff
costs for reviewing the questionnaires of organizations withdrawing
from the program, as well as the necessary Web site infrastructure to
facilitate submission of the proper documents. Additionally, this fee
is set to be less than any organization would be required to pay for
recertification. These fees are set forth below:
Revised Annual Fee Schedule for the EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Frameworks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single Both
Organization's annual revenue framework frameworks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$0 to $5 million................................ $250 $375
Over $5 million to $25 million.................. 650 975
Over $25 million to $500 million................ 1,000 1,500
Over $500 million to $5 billion................. 2,500 3,750
Over $5 billion................................. 3,250 4,875
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Fee for Retaining Data after Withdrawal: $200.
Organizations will have additional direct costs associated with
participating in the Privacy Shield. For example, Privacy Shield
organizations must provide a readily available independent recourse
mechanism to hear individual complaints at no cost to the individual.
Furthermore, organizations will be required to pay contributions in
connection with the arbitral model, as described in Annex I to the
Principles.
Method for Determining Fees
ITA collects, retains, and expends user fees pursuant to delegated
authority under the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act as
authorized in its annual appropriations acts. The Privacy Shield was
developed to provide organizations in the United States with a reliable
mechanism for personal data transfers that underpin the trade and
investment relationships between the United States and (1) the EU, and
(2) Switzerland. As one of only several valid data transfer mechanisms,
Privacy Shield operates in a way that provides strong consumer
protection as well as a more effective and efficient service to
corporations at a lower cost than other options, including standard
contractual clauses or binding corporate rules.
Fees are set taking into account the operational costs borne by ITA
to administer and supervise the Privacy Shield program. As described in
the Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, published September 30, 2016 (81 FR 267293), the Privacy
Shield program requires a significant commitment of resources and
staff. These costs include broad programmatic costs to run the Privacy
Shield as well as costs specific to each of the Privacy Shield
Frameworks and to the program that allows Participants to retain data
after withdrawal from Privacy Shield. The Privacy Shield includes
commitments from ITA to:
Maintain, upgrade, and update a Privacy Shield Web site;
verify self-certification requirements submitted by
organizations to participate in the Privacy Shield;
expand efforts to follow up with organizations that have
been removed from the Privacy Shield List and ensure, where applicable,
that questionnaires are correctly filed and processed;
search for and address false claims of participation;
conduct periodic compliance reviews and assessments of the
program;
provide information regarding the program to targeted
audiences;
increase cooperation with EU and Swiss data protection
authorities;
facilitate resolution of complaints about non-compliance;
hold annual meetings with the European Commission, Swiss
government, and other authorities to review the program; and
provide an update of laws relevant to Privacy Shield.
In setting these revised Privacy Shield fees, ITA determined that
the services provided offer special benefits to an identifiable
recipient beyond those that accrue to the general public. ITA
calculated the actual cost of providing its services in order to
provide a basis for setting each fee. This actual cost incorporates
direct and indirect costs, including operations and maintenance,
overhead, and charges for the use of capital facilities. ITA also took
into account additional factors, including adequacy of cost recovery,
affordability, and costs associated with alternative options available
to U.S. organizations for the receipt of personal data from the EU and
Switzerland. Furthermore, ITA considered the cost-savings and
efficiencies gained in staff hours through simultaneous review of self-
certifications for both the Swiss-U.S. and EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks. This analysis balanced these cost savings with projected
expenses, including, but not limited to, Web site development, further
negotiations with the EU and Switzerland, an annual review,
certification review, and facilitating complaint resolutions.
ITA will continue to use the established five-tiered fee schedule
(81 FR 267293) that has promoted participation of small organizations
in Privacy Shield, while implementing a reduced rate for organizations
self-certifying to both the Swiss-U.S. and EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Frameworks. A
[[Page 16378]]
multiple-tiered fee schedule allows ITA to offer organizations with
lower revenue a lower fee. In setting the five tiers, ITA considered,
in conjunction with the factors mentioned above: (1) The Small Business
Administration's guidance on identifying small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) in various industries most likely to participate in the Privacy
Shield, such as computer services, software and information services;
(2) the likelihood that small companies would be expected to receive
less personal data and thereby use fewer government resources; and (3)
the likelihood that companies with higher revenue would have more
customers whose data they process, which would use more government
resources dedicated to administering and overseeing Privacy Shield. For
example, if a company holds more data it could reasonably produce more
questions and complaints from consumers and EU and Swiss Data
Protection Authorities (DPAs). ITA has committed to facilitating the
resolution of individual complaints and to communicating with the FTC
and the DPAs regarding consumer complaints. Lastly, the fee increases
between the tiers are based in part on projected program costs and
estimated participation levels among companies within each tier.
As noted above, the revised fee schedule recoups the costs to ITA
for operating and maintaining Privacy Shield. Organizations seeking to
join the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework may do so beginning on
April 12, 2017, through Privacyshield.gov. ITA has taken into account
efficiencies and economies of scale experienced when organizations
participate in both Frameworks by providing a 50 percent discount off
the second Framework and requiring organizations to synchronize their
recertifications. The added cost of joining a second Framework reflects
the additional expenses incurred, including, but not limited to, for
communications with DPAs and Web site infrastructure and development,
as well as the additional costs of cooperating and communicating
separately with the EU and Swiss representatives and governments.
The fee applied to organizations that withdraw from Privacy Shield
but maintain data is meant to cover the programmatic costs associated
with ITA's processing of such organizations' annual affirmation of
commitment to continue to apply the Privacy Shield Framework Principles
to the personal information they received while participating in the
Privacy Shield. The flat fee is based on the expectation that
government resources required to process this annual affirmation will
be similar for all companies, regardless of size.
Conclusion
Based on the information provided above, ITA believes that the
revised Privacy Shield cost recovery fees are consistent with the
objective of OMB Circular A-25 to ``promote efficient allocation of the
nation's resources by establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least as great as the cost to the
U.S. Government of providing the special benefits . . .'' OMB Circular
A-25(5)(b). ITA is providing the public with the opportunity to comment
on the fee schedule, and it will consider these comments when it next
reassesses the fee schedule. As noted in the Cost Recovery Fee Schedule
for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, published September 30, 2016
(81 FR 267293), ITA will conduct its next fee reassessment after August
1, 2017, at the conclusion of the first year of implementation of the
Privacy Shield. ITA will continue to conduct reassessments thereafter
at least every two years, in accordance with OMB Circular A-25.
Dated: March 28, 2017.
Alysha Taylor,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, Industry & Analysis,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2017-06437 Filed 4-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P